Slashdot Mirror


Russian Bitcoin Issuers Will Risk 7 Years In Prison (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: The Russian Ministry of Finance has announced an amendment to the country's criminal code which will impose prison sentences of up to seven years for the issuing of Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. A government source speaking to Interfax (Russian) said that the maximum prison sentence for individuals found issuing cryptocurrencies would be 2-4 years, and/or up to three years' worth of salary or income, whilst managers of dispensing institutions could face seven years in prison, up to four years of income equivalent in fines, and a lifetime ban from similar posts. Russia announced the ban on Bitcoin or other 'money surrogates' in February of 2014, asserting that cryptocurrencies facilitate money-laundering and other criminal activity.

99 comments

  1. Capital flight is for Oligarchs only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You dirty commoners get to stew while our economy craters!

  2. In Soviet Russia by idbeholda · · Score: 4, Funny

    The bank robs you.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Also in Japan, Switzerland, Sweden, and Denmark. Also, the ECB. And probably coming soon to a country very near you.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia by grumpy_old_grandpa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Citation needed. Because according to this, there are few or no special regulations for Bitcoin in the countries you mentioned:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia by ClickOnThis · · Score: 4, Insightful
      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    4. Re:In Soviet Russia by mrlibertarian · · Score: 3, Informative

      I believe the AC was referring to negative interest rates.

    5. Re:In Soviet Russia by Aighearach · · Score: 1, Informative

      People who think bank fees are robbery should probably read more. Maybe that "fine print" is important documentation, and not just entertainment for silly nerds?

      As an American, every time I've ever had a bank fee I didn't think was fair, I just went into my bank and asked them to rescind the fee (or challenged it if it was a technical error) and they agreed to do it every single time.

      Of course, I only complained about incorrect, confusing, or unclear fees, not just regular ones that are part of the offered service.

      It is the same in most countries with modern banking. There are a few sucky banks of course, so choose the bank that has a good reputation for the type of services you're interested in and not just the one with the most branches or the best advertisement.

      You can just read the headline of your link and understand the difference: Bank fees in the West are simply "annoying" and can be "avoided" by collecting knowledge. Is that true in Russia? No, in Russia the rules might change and you'll still get punished for having done it before it was banned, on the theory that if they had to ban it then it must have been something awful and you should have known better than to make Puttiput mad.

      Remember, hating America is not patriotic. And electing a Democrat for President doesn't magically make the US the same as Russia.

    6. Re:In Soviet Russia by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I thought they were talking about the ECB being able to automatically print money and leverage it against countries in the EU to offset inflation at a national level vs a country level.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    7. Re:In Soviet Russia by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Wait, what?

      Somewhere in that pile of logical and well-reasoned text, albeit not tacitly articulated, you're expecting people to be educated, alert, and accepting of personal responsibility or accountability?

      That's no way to get elected.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:In Soviet Russia by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Somewhere in that pile of logical and well-reasoned text, albeit not tacitly articulated, you're expecting people to be educated, alert, and accepting of personal responsibility or accountability?

      No, I simply target my communication at those parties, and I really don't care about the comprehension ratio or average interpretation. ;)

      There is way too much available noise for me to worry about the external ratio. I'm only worried about controlling my own data stream.

  3. But... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will Edward Snowden say?

    1. Re:But... but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever Putin tells him to say.

  4. Only outlaws will have bitcoin by evilRhino · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It looks like they are basically making it illegal to sell bitcoin for money within Russia. I can't imagine any legitimate businesses will accept the hassle, but hackers will likely still be able to exchange bitcoin for money overseas. Personally, I think the large delays in accepting bitcoin transfers is probably more harmful to its value as a currency, and this would likely not help any. If I held any bitcoin, I would sell them now before they reach firesale value.

    1. Re:Only outlaws will have bitcoin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea... because russia is bitcoins #1 user...

    2. Re:Only outlaws will have bitcoin by Yomers · · Score: 2

      Basically nothing gonna change - you may confirm it by observing BTC/RUR exchange offers at localbitcoins.com. Russian internet currency exchanges have operated illegally since the beginning of times. I see news like this couple of times a year - yep, bitcoin transactions continue to illegal in Russia.

    3. Re:Only outlaws will have bitcoin by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      That's the whole point, the oligarchs were supposed to divest themselves of significant foreign assets and start bringing their money home years ago, in preparation for annexing Ukraine and the anticipated sanctions.

      This is entirely about preventing cash flight. The black market is bringing money in, not sending it overseas. This is not about he black market, and how big the effect on price will be depends mostly on how much of the bitcoin market is actually legit Russian wealth pretending to be the black market so that it is liquid.

      Russians are not supposed to have hard liquid assets, their economy is on a soft money diet now. Welcome to Neosoviet Puttiland.

    4. Re:Only outlaws will have bitcoin by jfengel · · Score: 1

      Exactly. It provides a tool for identifying criminals: if you're using bitcoins, then you're doing something illegal. They don't even necessarily have to enforce the bitcoin law, just investigate whatever you're doing for the bitcoins. And if they fail at that, they can enforce the bitcoin law, like putting mobsters in jail for tax evasion.

      Not saying that's a good thing, necessarily. The same thing could go for criminalizing cryptography. Even without that, crypto does potentially make you a target, and I suspect that big comms providers like GMail have been specifically discouraged from making crypto too easy.

    5. Re:Only outlaws will have bitcoin by dbIII · · Score: 1

      like putting mobsters in jail for tax evasion

      That example keeps on coming up but if you look at raw (not sanitized) history it's for the wrong reasons.
      It was about "routing around damage". Hoover's infamously corrupt FBI was not going to deal with the mobsters but the IRS had not been paid off so the government of the day used them to deal with the problem.
      We still have lie detectors in use as a legacy of Hoover taking kickbacks.

  5. Russia = No Anonimity by evolutionary · · Score: 1

    Let's see: There's an award given for information leading to anyone using the TOR network. And now a prison sentence for anyone issuing a form of currency that can hide your identity. What's next, outlawing hoodies so the IP Cams can ID you on the Russian Equivalent of Facebook?

    --
    "Imagination is more important than knowledge" - Einstein
    1. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How soon before Putin goes full Hitler and moves to the next step?

    2. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building a national autobahn system?

    3. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0, Troll

      The next step might be a "Pact of Steel" with Trump.

    4. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by jimbolauski · · Score: 1

      You should read up on bit coin it is much less anonymous then using cash. There is a public electronic record for every transaction made.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    5. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 0

      Blitzkrieg ukraine and maybe all the way to West Germany

    6. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      You should read up on bit coin it is much less anonymous then using cash. There is a public electronic record for every transaction made.

      It's "differently anonymous", not "less anonymous". For one thing, if you're transacting in cash then it's hard to avoid interacting with the other party in person. They probably know who you are, and your location can be monitored to reveal who you interact with. Cash isn't exactly impossible to trace in its own right, either, thanks to the need for physical handling (thus leaving DNA evidence) and unique serial numbers.

      Bitcoin transactions are recorded in a public ledger, but that ledger only lists the addresses involved, not the identities of the two parties exchanging funds. By itself this doesn't give very much away. To discover who was actually involved they would first need to follow the transactions until they find an address they already have an identity for, and then hope that this party is both within their jurisdiction and aware of the identity of the next party in the chain. Best practices indicate that the receiving addresses should be unique for each transaction, so even for well-known merchants and exchanges the mapping from addresses to public identity is not necessarily obvious.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
    7. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is not anonymous, but the way it works it can be made anonymous with fairly simple means..

      For every transaction that is made the address where your money is stored changes..
      Say address A wants to send money to address B. This results in a transaction from address A to address B and address C. Next time you want to do a transaction you will send money from address C, and it makes it really hard to follow, but not impossible with enough data, but it will never be with a 100% accuracy..

      But anyway, lets say you want to do anonymous transactions you have a few options..
      - Get a prepaid SIM with data and do the transfer there, preferrably not close to where you usually hang out..
      - Print out a transaction and hand it over in paper-form.
      - Get yourself a VPN that does not do logging and/or use TOR..
      - Use public wifi for all transactions..

      Problem is when you want to withdraw..... but with more and more places actually accepting bitcoin there might not be a need to exchange it for another currency.

    8. Re:Russia = No Anonimity by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Don't know about Russia but in France, it is forbidden to wear clothing designed to hide your face in public space.
      It was conceived as an anti-Burka law but it may apply to hoodies. It is no more serious than a parking ticket and it is rarely put in practice but it can give the police a reason to arrest you.

  6. In Soviet Russia? by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Russia announced the ban on Bitcoin or other 'money surrogates' in February of 2014, asserting that cryptocurrencies facilitate money-laundering and other criminal activity.

    I believe that was mistranslated. I think it should actually read that cryptocurrencies don't facilitate the graft and money grabbing of Putin and his friends. Sure, I might be nitpicking on a little error of translation, but it's important to get things right.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:In Soviet Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they want you to use gold, diamonds, or the russian mafia controlled websites used for sending money online.

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia? by Coren22 · · Score: 2

      I just assumed that the next law would be against the use of the ruble as it can be used to facilitate money-laundering.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:In Soviet Russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atually if anything bitcoin would make that even easier to do and hide. What Cryptocurrencies do do however is make that corruption easy for everyone which is deinitely not what they want/.

  7. Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2

    That's the whole point! Untraceable, unaccountable, easily-hidden money. The cops can't find it on you by checking your pockets; the FBI can't find it by checking your bank account; and the individual block chains tend to flow in and out of exchanges with no association to who is putting them in or taking them out. Bitcoin exchanges are money laundering operations as a feature: bitcoins go into a consolidated fund, and the same number of bitcoins come back out of that consolidated fund; they're different block chains, so their block history is not traceable to any particular original owner.

    It's like they just wrote the mission statement of Bitcoin and said "ILLEGAL!"

    1. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Wait... explain to me why are consensual value-for-value trades are considered "illegal"? I'm a libertarian, and I'd like to know.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Coren22 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      How do I take the money from my drug enterprise into bitcoin without any tracing back to me?
      Is there a bank where I can walk up with $10 million and ask to convert it into bitcoin without the bank requiring ID?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    3. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because "Control"

      If the government can't control you, you are a danger to the government. And government cannot allow its people to be uncontrolled.

      And this "war on crypto-currency" will fare about as well as the War on Drugs has.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    4. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 2

      That's the whole point! Untraceable, unaccountable, easily-hidden money. The cops can't find it on you by checking your pockets; the FBI can't find it by checking your bank account; and the individual block chains tend to flow in and out of exchanges with no association to who is putting them in or taking them out. Bitcoin exchanges are money laundering operations as a feature: bitcoins go into a consolidated fund, and the same number of bitcoins come back out of that consolidated fund; they're different block chains, so their block history is not traceable to any particular original owner.

      It's like they just wrote the mission statement of Bitcoin and said "ILLEGAL!"

      Avoiding the egregious charges of card processing companies is a legitimate and very appealing use. That's is why we accept risk in society. So we can have nice things, even though bad people don't stop being bad.
       

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    5. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is that what 'issuing' means? trading value-for-value? I was thrown by the word 'issuing' since there is no central control.

    6. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      will fare about as well as the War on Drugs has

      That's only because we've been coddling the drug dealers. Had we gotten rid of them things would have turned out much different.

      Instead we keep doing the same things over and over and expecting different results.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    7. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's not really true. The War on Drugs hasn't failed at all.

      The War on Drugs has been a *huge* success... for those people who want a ready made excuse to throw people in jail.

      Guess what the War on Bitcoin will provide?

      The goal of the law isn't to *end* Bitcoin, it is merely to keep it from overtaking the ruble for most purchases. In this, it will totally succeed.

      Also, by insuring that you can only buy criminal things with now-criminal crypto-currency, it will ensure that Bitcoin never gets a reputation as being useful for normal business. Just having a Bitcoin will equate you with all sorts of drug runners, terrorists, and child pornography sorts all by association. I can already envision the judges and jury recoiling from you with a look of fear and disgust on their faces for your dirty crimes.

      Bitcoin threat averted. And here you thought that they were failing....

    8. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's basically exactly analogous to cash.

      With cash, you can trace it with the serial number and with bitcoin you need the chain - both are trivial to work around, though laundering physical money is harder.

      With cash you cannot tell who gave you the cash- this is also the case with a "laundered" bitcoin. Here cash has the edge since you don't need to take any action.

      With cash, you can hide it anywhere - just like your bitcoin wallet. Bitcoin has an edge here because the wallet is ultimately just a number. It is easier to hide a slice of information than a physical pile of cash.

      Both seem to scare the hell out of authorities. That's perhaps the best "feature".

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your cure is worse than the disease.

    10. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're a fad libertarian if you didn't know governments frequently ban things like carrying large amounts of money, traveling with large amounts of money, or making large bank account deposits and withdrawals without disclosure to the authorities. In Alabama, a routine traffic stop will end in the police confiscating your drug money if they notice you have more than $100 in cash. No drug charges, just "that's a lot of cash to be carrying. Don't you use credit cards, boy? That must be for drugs. Now we can't arrest you for drugs, but we can take your money on suspicion of involvement in illegal activities."

    11. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      It's one thing to trace a $10 million withdrawal to you; it's something completely different to trace that $10 million back to a Mexican in Palo Alto acting as a known drop point for large cocaine shipments. How *did* that $10 million get into your bank account? It looks like money went into the exchange, and money came out; but we don't know whose hands it passed through, or what investments it went through, in its context as transactions.

    12. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Avoiding card charges isn't what bitcoin was originally marketed for. "Privacy" was its main thrust.

    13. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a bank where I can walk up with $10 million and ask to convert it into bitcoin without the bank requiring ID?

      Sure, most any bank in the world.
      But they'll just look at you funny.
      If you're funny looking to begin with, it'll be twice as funny.

    14. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purchase the bitcoins & run them through a tumbler... It's not hard.

    15. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by ancientt · · Score: 1

      Oh deary me! I do hope so, since I have a few dollars worth of bitcoin now that will be worth hundreds or thousands if this progresses the same way as the War on Drugs.

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    16. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I am funny looking for sure....

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    17. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Russians aren't interested in libertarianism, and not even close.

      If that is your personal perspective, great. But it has nothing to do with Russia, and if you insist on trying to understand Russia based on your personal views, instead of their views, you'll have little chance to understand because it will never appear to make any sense. It will just be gobblygook until you try looking at it using "theory of mind."

      Russia banned cash flight in preparation for annexing Ukraine and being sanctioned by the international community. They don't mind value-for-value trades, they mind soft-for-hard currency trades. Hard currency can leave the country. They certainly don't dislike value-for-value though; the main non-cash trade item in Russia is unopened bottles of Russian vodka. It is a standard barter item, it is almost like coinage. But you can't buy bottles of vodka at retail and then export them to move your money out. There would be too much overhead, you'd lose most of it. Bitcoin is free and easy to move outside the country, so of course they're banning local exchanges.

      As to the lack of tractability, or the FBI even having an opinion on it, that part is all hogwash. The FBI can track it just fine. The US has a long history of alternative or private currencies. I grew up with "wooden nickels" that were issued by the local Chamber of Commerce. (they were worth 50 cents) So those are non-issues here. The reason bitcoin is used for money laundering is that the exchanges generally do not have mandatory reporting, so it would have to be traced by first suspecting a specific crime by a specific person, and investigating that. With regular banking, there are all sorts of reporting thresholds and spot checks and things like that that can uncover the activity without starting from a human-generated lead. In traditional banking they already have evidence of suspicious behavior before they even apply for a warrant. With bitcoin they'd need some other type of reason to even know who to ask for a warrant about.

      Criminals, including money launderers, aren't really concerned about traceability, because they have to keep records the same as any other business. They care about discoverabilty; they don't want the authorities to gain access to their ledgers in the first place. If they do, they will find ways to trace things by correlation. Pooling in consolidated funds just obfuscates things enough to prevent casual discoverability.

    18. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      How do I take the money from my drug enterprise into bitcoin without any tracing back to me?
      Is there a bank where I can walk up with $10 million and ask to convert it into bitcoin without the bank requiring ID?

      They didn't say the crime is easy, they said this tool is used by the people doing it. ;)

      There are additional steps and parts to the plan. Generally, you have to create a fake business and pretend it has income, and so you lose the overhead of the business, and pay taxes on the claimed profit, so you end up paying more taxes than a legit business. You don't just drop it in the bank. You do a bunch of risky things, and end up with 25 cents on the dollar if you're good at it. That is why lower level criminals just spend it directly instead of trying to launder it.

      Think about it: if it was easy, organized crime wouldn't have a reputation of offering it as a service!

    19. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume banks will totally forget about the ID requirement if they can be involved in transactions > $10 million. They won't use there loopholes on $1000 customers but that does not mean there aren’t any, and I have to see the first bank that will not use loopholes on morale grounds when a good money can be made.

    20. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      The war on drugs wasn't designed to toss people in jail. The laws designed to toss people in jail are the differences between Crack and Powder versions of Cocaine, between 1 OZ pot and more than one OZ. Speaking of Pot, isn't it interesting that in spite of it being "illegal" for years, that people still use(d) it?

      Basically, I see BitCoin as something that is outside Government Control, and thus a danger to governments. And enough people will use it for normal activities in addition to Illegal ones. And once people start trading FOR BitCoin and not from it, the game will be over.

      I should change my sig to "Will work for BitCoin" :-D

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    21. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      And people will still use Bitcoin, but while it is illegal, you won't be able to avoid using government currency for just about everything that the government might notice. That is them winning.

      You could always get and use pot. It's never been particularly hard to get. That's not the point. The point was to drive it underground and make all activities associated with it into something you could charge people with.

      Yes, they didn't intend to have the War on Drugs become something to throw people in jail for, but it became a very quickly useful means of throwing people in jail for offenses where the police could not get eyewitness accounts out of neighbors in inner cities. If you have a possession charge, then no one had to see you be a gang member, and with the moral outrage about drugs, it was easy to get more and more money and equipment and penalties so you could throw people in jail.

      As a white person from the suburbs, I never partook of it myself, but I certainly knew who was doing it and even some of the small time dealers. None of them have ever been busted for anything. That's because drug crime is one of those crimes where the cops basically trundle it out as a proxy crime for something they think that some gang member did, but they have no way to prove it. But they do have that small bag of mostly harmless plant material right in front of them.

      BitCoin is not a danger to governments any more than pot was. It's all under control. And now, it's another way to bust you for a crime that they can't prove you committed. Sure, your BitCoin purchase was anonymous, so they have no idea it was you who bought those drugs or other contraband. Too bad that your possession of BitCoins is sufficient to throw you in jail, so now it's irrelevant that they can't prove it. They just moved the goal posts back to a place where they could make an easy win.

    22. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by SpankiMonki · · Score: 1

      Avoiding card charges isn't what bitcoin was originally marketed for. "Privacy" was its main thrust.

      Sigh. You have it exactly backwards.

      Read the Satoshi paper. Avoiding the need for trusted intermediaries (i.e., banks/card companies) when processing electronic transactions over the internet was what bitcoin was originally "marketed" for.

      Privacy is mentioned in the paper, but only in so much as to show that the system might actually afford less privacy than the traditional banking model.

    23. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are quite a few places where you can find bitcoin ATM's... insert money and then you get some bitcoins.. all without an ID.... may take a while to handle $10M =)

    24. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I've seen your picture. I didn't laugh...

      I kid, I kid...

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    25. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to post this as an AC.

      You're assumption is incorrect, inasmuch as US banks are concerned. They absolutely want positive identification if you're dealing with large sums. I'm sure that there are banks elsewhere that might consider it. There are options other than banks and there are private banks and those will vary depending on locale and jurisdiction and legal status. You might be correct if you'd said, "I assume some banks ..."

      Having had some good fortune means that I've personally dealt with some decent sized asset totals. Nobody, that I know of, usually had that much in physical form. When I sold my business, I didn't get so much as an oversize check. I didn't even get to keep the petty-cash on hand. As some of the sale price was in shares in the now parent company, I didn't even get a physical copy of those.

    26. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree, and here's why:

      Bitcoin is ultimately traceable via the blockchain and cashing in / out. Your bank touches your crypto currency transactions at least once or twice, either when you buy them or when you sell them. You know what the only real way to avoid that is? Buying them via cash. The true king of money laundering is now, always has been and will always be cash. You can't trace cash moving wallet to wallet but you can trace bitcoins. I think encouraging people to use bitcoins for nefarious actions would be preferable to law enforcement than using cash.

      You think that banks are pushing for digital transactions as a replacement for cash for the sake of our convenience? No. It's for the sake of control.

    27. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forget that Bitcoin transactions / wallets can be unmasked to reveal IP addresses. Here's one example: http://www.coindesk.com/eavesdropping-attack-can-unmask-60-bitcoin-clients/

      Can't do that with cash. Cash isn't hard to launder either, anyone can do it easily. I was going to go in to basic detail but decided against it, suffice to say... it's really not hard.

      I do agree with you though, Bitcoin and cash are equally scary to authorities who like to know everything, but cash is still easier and ultimately less risky for criminals. Maybe that will change as banks force us down the digital transactions road to replace cash altogether, but right now... cash is still king.

    28. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You forget that Bitcoin transactions / wallets can be unmasked to reveal IP addresses

      While I'm not all that intimate with Bitcoin, I did actually remember that, which is why I mentioned laundering - you need to launder the bitcoin to stay anonymous. It is probably a little easier to launder Bitcoin than cash, but I could very well be wrong as I have never had the need to launder either :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    29. Re:Of course bitcoin facilitates money laundering! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you accept cash for your drugs? Take bitcoins and buy a car or house with it. Let the users change their paper money into BC.

  8. Don't steal, the government hates competition. by s13g3 · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Russia announced the ban on Bitcoin or other 'money surrogates' in February of 2014, asserting that cryptocurrencies facilitates public competition to the government's own money-laundering and other criminal activity while making it more difficult for the government to interfere with legitimate private economic activity."

    FTFY.

    --
    "Inveniemus Viam Aut Faciemus" 'We will find a way... Or we will make one!' --Hannibal of Carthage
    1. Re:Don't steal, the government hates competition. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  9. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of COURSE the meglomaniaical batshit insane Putin would ban Bitcoin...that would undermine the 10s of billions he stole from the Russian Economy and doled out to his lackeys, hangers-on and family, not to mention the dozens of 'male massage therapists' he has to pay to keep quiet about the fun-times in the Kremlin.

  10. Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by zenlessyank · · Score: 2

    about the laws made by man to control man. It has always been this way and it will ALWAYS be this way now and in the future. Pass all the laws you want.

    1. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      the lawmakers have armed goons and cages and torture centers to support their will and control over you, and enforce their interpretation of the scribbles they made on paper. you're been fucked, are being fucked, and will be fucked over until you die.

    2. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      Since we are all born fucked, I don't see this as intimidating.

    3. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by KGIII · · Score: 1

      As your moniker indicates you're an American, I can see why you'd express such bravado seeing as this is a half world away.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by zenlessyank · · Score: 1

      And you sound like a typical earthling willing to follow whatever any cocksucker tells you, I would imagine. I am sorry you are motivated to let others think for you, and being an 'American' has nothing to do with whether you succumb to others will. You might as well put a bullet in my head, whether in Russia, South Africa, or Israel, or America. I won't follow rules I don't like no matter where they originate. Troll on motherfucker!!!!

    5. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You're the third pretend tough guy I saw yesterday on Slashdot. You guys having a convention or something?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    6. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the third?

      They must be on vacation.

    7. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I was kind of slacking so I missed something. It's like those people who say, "If I was there, I'd have done something." No, they'd have pissed themselves while whimpering in the corner. Talk is cheap. I'm not sure why they'd think that anyone would believe them. Tough guys don't go around telling people how tough they are. They don't need to.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words are interposed

    9. Re:Some Peeps Don't Give 2 Fucks by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      America has identical issues

  11. Max Keiser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really curious what Max Keiser (a big bitcoin evangelizer and RT propagandist) has to say about it. That is, if his head has not exploded already.

  12. News Flash! by fishscene · · Score: 1

    ..This just in! The Russian Ministry of Logic declared the following: Russia announced the ban on currency other 'money surrogates' in March of 2016, asserting that all currencies facilitate money-laundering and other criminal activity. *not an actual announcement*

  13. Can't allow competition to criminal activity by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Governments (this time it's Russia) cannot allow competition on criminal activity. Governments are the only ones with the 'legal' (legal in quotes, anything governments do they see as legal) authority to any form of criminal activity. All that governments are is criminal activity. No individual is allowed to murder another individual, to steal, to kidnap. Governments do all those things and it's legal because they say it is.

    I am going to translate some of the text from here:

    Moscow, March 10th, INTERFAX.RU

    Ministry of Finance has prepared a more strict set of rules that will be added to the criminal code. These rules will apply to issuance of fiat currencies (in TFA they call it 'currency surrogates'). Anybody issuing a 'currency surrogate' can be sent to prison for up to 4 years. For any top managers of banks or financial organisations the prison sentence can be up to 7 years and also a prohibition to work in certain top management positions in the future.

    The previous version of the law was less strict in that it only would have sent a person to prison for up to 1 year maximum (or if somebody is a part to an organisation up to 2 years maximum) for any one of the following:
    1. purchasing with the intent to sell,
    2. selling of 'money surrogates'

    According to the March rule changes, now for the same 'offence' the punishment will include a monetary fine of up to 500,000 rubles or an amount equal to the 3 years of salary or 3 years of any other income of the 'offender' or imprisonment of up to 4 years.

    In case an individual acts as part of an organisation the prison sentence went up to 4 years. Also for an organisation (organized group) there is also a fine starting from 500,000 rubles up to 1,000,000 rubles or an amount equal to 2 - 4 years or salary or other income and a prison sentence of up to 6 years.

    Also for top managers of a financial institution, a bank, an insurance company, a stock market, etc.), the penalties will be much heavier. They will face up to 7 years in prison and they will no longer be allowed to work in top management positions in certain companies (and government I suppose) and they will not be allowed to work in certain professions for a period of up to 3 years. They also may face a fine from 1,000,000 to 2,500,000 rubles or an amount equal to 2-4 years of their income.

    Ministry of Finance considers usage of 'money surrogates' to be a proof of criminal activity by definition and by default.

    1. Re:Can't allow competition to criminal activity by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Governments do all those things and it's legal because they say it is.

      It can be stated simply that "government" is an organization that is exempt from the ethics of a society.

      Otherwise it'd just be a club, or a business. The question a considered person must ask himself is, "if our ethics are good, why do we need an exception, or if we need an exception, are ours ethics sufficiently univeralized?" n.b. government schools don't teach philosophy in K-12; who really needs to learn how to think?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  14. In Soviet Russia by future+assassin · · Score: 1

    the bit coins you!

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  15. Banning all money surrogates? by mark-t · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't that include any form of barter or trade that did not involve the government sanctioned currency?

    This would mean even playing games that use fictional currency would be illegal, wouldn't it?

    1. Re:Banning all money surrogates? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      This would mean even playing games that use fictional currency would be illegal, wouldn't it?

      Yeah - when I testified on a similar bill in my State, I pointed out that their language puts the banking department in charge of WoW gold.

      The bureaucrat who was there said, "nuh-uh". They had no clue about the blockchain or anything else to demonstrate any competency in the field. So, of course they want to be in charge.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    2. Re:Banning all money surrogates? by Prune · · Score: 1

      1. In virtually every nation, barter and trade are subject to taxes. Yes, if you're a a rancher in Texas and trade your horse for another's few cows and you don't pay tax on that, you have actually done something illegal.
      2. You can only pay your taxes in the national currency, in the US and pretty much all other nations who are sovereign currency issues.
      Now, put (1) and (2) together and you'll realize that the combination enforces the use of the official currency even if there is no explicit law banning other currencies, leaving bitcoin et al. for illicit transactions and as a type of commodity.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    3. Re:Banning all money surrogates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly in some cases. If there is a line then Spells of Genesis really blurred it by creating a cryptocurrency for use in their game. https://spellsofgenesis.com/users/faq#q3

    4. Re:Banning all money surrogates? by mark-t · · Score: 1

      That would mean that even doing someone a favour in exchange for any kind of good or service would also be illegal... since no money will have exchanged hands. For example, saying that I will mow your lawn next week if you let me borrow your car tonight would be an example of a private barter that cannot be taxed, and this is somehow illegal?

    5. Re:Banning all money surrogates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if there is an easy way to exchange bitcoin for the local currency...

      Bitcoin is perfect for paying stuff over the internet... No need to use a CC and leave all your information, *irony* that they are so good protecting *irony*, to each place you buy things at..

  16. Let me guess... by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

    Russian users just got hit with their first ransomware attack?

  17. It's theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You WILL use the ruble, no matter HOW much we devalue it.

    If you hold say 10,000 rubles, and the State prints a bunch of money, or hammers the economy by idiot politics or decisions or corruption, and your rouble is now worth half as much, you've just lost 5,000 roubles.

    What people want to do of course when the currency they hold is abused, is use a different currency.

    What the State has to do is absolutely block them from doing so, because of course it strikes at the very heart of the State's ability to control the economy and taxation.

    There is a long and fine history of States passing draconian laws, enforcing hideous penalties, on people who wish to use something other than the currency they are forced to use by the State.

    It's all about power, wealth and theft.

  18. Bitcoin doesn't clean very well. by sims+2 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I always use Tide when I launder my money. http://nymag.com/news/features...
    Leaves it with a nice fresh scent too!

    --
    Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  19. Makes sense, bitcoin is the currency of crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the majority of bitcoin users are drug addicts, drug dealers, and pedophiles, it makes sense that Russia is taking this move.

    1. Re:Makes sense, bitcoin is the currency of crime by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Yeah!

      Wait. What about the criminals in charge of Russia itself, who arrest and murder political opposition and free press reporters?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Makes sense, bitcoin is the currency of crime by dbIII · · Score: 1

      News today on that topic - "heart attack victim" had a lot of blunt trauma to the head.

  20. It's more about Russia than bitcoin by dbIII · · Score: 1

    This is a symptom of the sort of authoritarian shit that "pussy riot" was jailed for protesting against and has nothing much to do with bitcoin itself. Bitcoin is not seen as something ideal people do so it's being outlawed for being on the fringe - it really has nothing to do with whether bitcoin is a scam or not.
    It's a symptom of increased efforts to control.


    I should add that we should not dismiss it as being an "only in Russia" problem since a tendency to authoritarian rule crops up all over the place. Think of it as "that could be us too if we are not careful" next time the TSA squeeze your balls. It's a difference of degree of control so things could get as bad as in Russia.

  21. Shark pissed off at being jumped over by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    Seriously. There comes a time when a government just effectively openly declares:
    "I am insane and megalomaniacal. Just ignore me and go full black market libertarian."

    The Russian government apparently just did this.

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Shark pissed off at being jumped over by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      really it's as if they want another October 1917, but instead of commies waving red tomes this time around maybe they should try something else. Mafia "State Capitalism" just isn't cutting it, gawdless-Commie-ism didnt'....gotta be something else to try, some europeans countries doing a lot better than they are now

    2. Re:Shark pissed off at being jumped over by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      I gather from you comment, you have a lot of hard cash sunk into mining ponzi currencies, specifically bitcoin. It's not like everyone wasn't warned it was inevitable, especially when bitcoin miners were douching around bragging about using bitcoin to enable criminal activities and cheat on taxes. Russia fault, hmm, not so much more like the US government's fault. The US government picked up a whole bunch of bitcoins are were using them to fund criminal espionage activities, kind of screwing it up for you. Once the US government started using it to fund criminal espionage activities bit coins days were numbered (sucks they didn't inform you first but you should have expected it after those major bitcoin confiscations and of course their huge ability to mine bitcoins, pretty much as they already do via the corrupt US Federal reserve). You just got bankrupted in the cross fire because the banning of bitcoin will spread for exactly that reason not so much organised crime because that is also a reason but mainly criminal espionage activities.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:Shark pissed off at being jumped over by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I've learned a few things in my life - often by observation but I also have a penchant for learning the history of a variety of subjects.

      There are a few things that are near certainties:

      If you screw with the wealthy and powerful, it doesn't often turn out well.
      Revolutions *never* result in the utopia the revolutionaries wanted - it's temporary, at best.
      There will be violence, it is as inevitable as entropy.
      The pendulum swings both ways - at either extreme it's often really bad.
      There are a lot of pendulums.
      An idealist, given control, is an absolute path to problems.
      Humans are not rational actors, they are rationalizing actors.
      Greed and stupidity seem to be in infinite supply.
      Rose-colored glasses do nobody any good - ever.
      Humans tend to make things needlessly complicated or more complex than they already were.
      If there is a god, he's an asshole.

      I could go on. The list certainly goes on. Those are, I think, among the more important things I've noticed but they're not exclusive nor are they listed in any particular order. Humans suck, I'm glad I'm not one of them.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Shark pissed off at being jumped over by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Knowledge is power, what was is not what will be because knowledge has changed in the interim. So tackling the corrupt rich is no longer what is was, we know the problem and the problem is not money, it is genetics and the brain defect of psychopaths. So there is a simple problem to solve how to keep psychopaths from positions of governance, control and influence because the destructively corrupt everything they touch, it is their inherent nature. This is new knowledge both in terms of genetics and psychology and with this knowledge we can change the entirety of humanity simply by the removal of a very negative influence. Human beings do not make things difficult a sub-species of humanity (there is sufficient cerebral difference to define them as a sub species) that make things difficult.

      As for God, well, that depends upon you individual definition of God, picking one, say Christian, two major tenets are free will and application of that free will is a test and dependent upon your behaviour you either rise to the light to join the choir singing of life or sink to the dark to scream alone in that dark. So is that definition of God bad for providing free will and it's temptations, hmm, really compared to the billions of years past and future, that tiny few years of free will and temptation, aren't really all that much but certainly are sufficient to measure the true value of a sentient being and establish it's spiritual worth as an expression of life and whether it promoted or detracted from life (an inherent value of life is the survival instinct to value life and to attempt to sustain it, so at the core, the value of life must be recognised in order for it to continue, regardless of the denials of psychopaths).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  22. Isn't the Russian government a criminal enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems I read the other day that another Russian was found to have died from blunt force injury during a stay in a DC hotel. Maybe they ran out of Polonium, an element that comes from nuclear reactors, or Polonium poisoning would have been too slow to kill the guy. Stay tuned for more news.