Twitter Can Predict Hurricane Damage As Well As Emergency Agencies (sciencemag.org)
sciencehabit quotes an article from ScienceMag.com: In October 2012, meteorologists noticed a massive low-pressure system forming over the waters south of Cuba. In just 5 days, it spun into one of the largest hurricanes on record, cutting a path up the eastern U.S. coast and devastating communities with flooding and 140-kilometer-per-hour winds. Superstorm Sandy posed a massive problem for government clean-up crews. Where should they send their limited emergency supplies and services? A new study suggests a way to get that answer fast: Just listen to Twitter. Scientists have found that data gathered from the social media platform is as accurate and powerful as that collected by FEMA.
https://xkcd.com/723/
Gee, a centralized place where people can easily post short catalogable messages provides valuable data about events. I thought Twitter was exclusively about narcissism.
"I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)
"Where should they send their limited emergency supplies and services?... Just listen to Twitter"
but if during emergency, twitter is inaccessible to certain locations and accessible to others, such a selection of response based on twitter will skew the response to those who have access.
furthermore if certain community/neighborhood have more social media usage and another less, it will also skew the response.
12 hours max, if the airport is closed. It only requires a lot of people, airplanes, and trucks to deliver. And we got plenty, all over the country. It's a simple question how much you want to spend and how fast.
And I can predict hurricane damage without Twitter. If you build your house out of concrete, above sea level, I'll bet odds it will stay intact. The biggest problem is frailty of the infrastructure, shoddy construction, etc. You got insurance, right? :-)
“He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
further to what i said above about access bias during emergency, i see another problem if twitter is used to channel public resources.
recently twitter established orwellian sounding "trust & safety council" to monitor, censor, and even ban, users who engage in hate speech and other such activities. it has already controversially banned some.
now twitter's actions/censorships/banning within its property can be justified because it is a private company . but public institutions selecting and channeling public resources based on interactions in a private gated community which is censoring speech(which is legal in public spaces outside of it however hateful) cannot be justified.
Twitter at 140 KPH? Keystrokes Per Human.
I guess predict doesn't mean what I thought it meant.
It won't stop the insurance agencies from ruling wind damage as water damage (and vice versa) to skip out of claims.
Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
Now FEMA will know which disaster to ignore even more rapidly.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
Didn't we read the same thing a dozen times already during the years?
Twitter, Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Altavista, Hotbot, CompuServe, ... can predict Hurricanes, the flu, tsunamis, bad weather ...
And if by predict you mean assist in identifying the area of greater impact.....