Slashdot Mirror


Oculus 'Always On' Services and Privacy Policy May Be a Cause for Concern (uploadvr.com)

Will Mason, reporting for Upload VR: It turns out when you install the software to run Facebook's Oculus Rift, it creates a process with full system permissions called "VRServer_x64.exe." This process is always on, and regularly sends updates back to Facebook's servers. The process' main purpose is to help detect when the Rift is turned on and on your face so that it can launch Oculus Home, but the further reaching implications of it are potentially much more salacious. Digging into the Oculus Rift's Privacy Policy reveals that Facebook is not the only company that is able to collect your data, as under the policy "third parties may also collect information about you through the Services," this includes entities on the "related companies" list. The company plans to utilize your data to, among other things, "market to you." Surprised?

96 comments

  1. Can't find it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried executing ps -ax. Can't see this process?

    1. Re:Can't find it by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The closest I come is:

      26083 ? Ssl 0:00 C:\windows\system32\services.exe

      I have WINE running because my favorite FTP client is an old Windows program called AbsoluteFTP.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  2. frosty piss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frosty piss

  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Oh my! by rmdingler · · Score: 1
    They were recently giving these Oculus headsets away at the Sprint store with a new Samsung Galaxy phone purchase.

    They have 360 degree filming and viewing ability, and their entertainment value is only exceeded by their ability to gather information.

    There's no Santa, even Easter rabbits don't lay eggs, and Facebook isn't really free.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wasn't an Oculus they were giving away.

    2. Re:Oh my! by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Was it a knockoffulus?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Oh my! by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      He's talking about the Gear VR, which is actually an Oculus product (though sold by Samsung):

      https://www.oculus.com/en-us/g...

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it! What an awesome new word

    5. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? That is like saying:

      "He is talking about the Macbook Air, which is actually a Sony Vaio product (though sold by Apple)".

      or the obligatory car analogy:

      "He is talking about the Fiat 500, which is actually a Ford product (though sold by Fiat)".

      Both are examples of VR headsets, there is nothing "Oculus product" about the Gear VR.

    6. Re:Oh my! by spire3661 · · Score: 1
      --
      Good-bye
    7. Re:Oh my! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      What are the odds of them coming back, apologizing, and thanking you for the correction?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    8. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The term (that people in the scene actually use) is "Oculus Thrift".

    9. Re:Oh my! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upon closer examination, you and El Rouso are correct and I am sorry.

      Also, I suck cocks.

  5. wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Someone signed up for Facebook is surprised that Facebook collects and sells their personal data? Really? That is literally how they make their money. It is the business they are in.

    By now it is well known: if you don't want that kind of harvesting, you don't use Facebook. That means: blocking their address blocks in your firewall, so you don't load their "like" buttons and you don't use their services in any way. You most certainly don't run their software on your machine! If you do that, well, yeah... you get what you deserve.

    If you are making a decision to use their services, whether Occulus or anything else, fine, that's your call! But don't complain when they do exactly what they told you they were going to do.

    1. Re:wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone signed up for Facebook is surprised that Facebook collects and sells their personal data? Really?

      LMFTFY: Someone who bought a virtual reality device is surprised to find that Facebook is collecting an selling their personal data. Really.

    2. Re:wait, what? by plover · · Score: 2

      Someone signed up for Facebook is surprised that Facebook collects and sells their personal data? Really?

      LMFTFY: Someone who bought a virtual reality device is surprised to find that Facebook is collecting an selling their personal data. Really.

      You didn't read even the first line of the summary: "It turns out when you install the software to run Facebook's Oculus Rift" [emphasis mine]. It's a Facebook product. If I buy a Honeywell thermostat with WiFi that provides thermostat access via the cloud, I would expect it to be in frequent contact with Honeywell's servers. Similarly, I would have every expectation that a Facebook VR set would contact Facebook's servers.

      The real questions anyone should have are "what data do they collect, how do they use it, who do they share it with, and how long do they store it?" Given that it's Facebook, I'm guessing the answers are: "every single byte; to build a better model of their customers to better market to them, and to match people with their personal network; they share it with everyone, warrant or not; and forever".

      --
      John
    3. Re:wait, what? by Desler · · Score: 1

      And that's surprising why? Facebook sells the device.

    4. Re:wait, what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually that's bad analogy, your honywell thermostat is giving you a feature that makes sense to also do data gathering. As in you can log on the "cloud" and tell it to cool your house down, and they happen to be the middle man.

      This is more like buying a fridge from GE that analyzes your poop then sells that info to your insurance company (and anyone else interested in your diet).

    5. Re:wait, what? by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When i buy an asus monitor, i dont expect to have to install software so it can call home. HMDs are very fancy monitors and should be treated as such.

      --
      Good-bye
    6. Re:wait, what? by rakslice · · Score: 1

      Exactly this. Pushing the boundaries of acceptable conduct on a platform to get background access for longer and ultimately deliver more information home is what Facebook's apps do. At the end of the day if you're a hardware company, and your bundled management/utility software has worn out its welcome (I'm thinking of you e.g. ASUS, Logitech), if I can still use your hardware fully with standard drivers, you will still get my business.

    7. Re:wait, what? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

      It's a Facebook product. If I buy a Honeywell thermostat with WiFi that provides thermostat access via the cloud, I would expect it to be in frequent contact with Honeywell's servers. Similarly, I would have every expectation that a Facebook VR set would contact Facebook's servers.

      I have no such expectation. There is no reason for a display with position tracking sensors glued to it communicate with Facebook servers any more than there is any reason for a keyboard to communicate with Unicomp or a monitor to communicate with Samsung.

      If you want to use a locked down DRM'd shitstore that communicates with facebook then it is reasonable to expect this bullshit .. however we were all assured that the Rift hardware would be OPEN... meaning participation in the bullshit would be optional.

      The real questions anyone should have are "what data do they collect, how do they use it, who do they share it with, and how long do they store it?" Given that it's Facebook, I'm guessing the answers are: "every single byte; to build a better model of their customers to better market to them, and to match people with their personal network; they share it with everyone, warrant or not; and forever".

      The real question anyone should have is where the **$#**#$ is the standalone runtime installer.

  6. DO NOT BUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The solution is simple. Do not buy this shit. And, tell your less technical friends. They are actively hostile to their would-be consumers. Just don't fucking buy it. In fact, outright spread the word that Occulus=scum.

    1. Re:DO NOT BUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all the "geeks" and geek bloggers tell me Oculus is the greatest thing since sliced bread and unlike all the other VR solutions before, THIS one is gonna change the world!

    2. Re:DO NOT BUY by PPH · · Score: 1

      I'll wait until they support Linux and OSX

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:DO NOT BUY by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      THIS one is gonna change the world!

      That's exactly what we're concerned about.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:DO NOT BUY by MtHuurne · · Score: 2

      Oculus Rift is not the only VR option. I'm considering the HTC Vive, since they partnered with Valve, who seem more serious about Linux support than Oculus is.

    5. Re:DO NOT BUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is nothing more than a big data company.

    6. Re:DO NOT BUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't stand all the disgusting kickstarters who promise Linux support, only to drop it the moment they have the cash. Foul.

    7. Re:DO NOT BUY by Immerman · · Score: 1

      And so it did - it demonstrated that at long last off-the-shelf hardware was capable of being assembled into an impressive consumer-grade VR headset at a reasonable price, and got several major manufacturers interested in producing them.

      Now, save up your pennies and get ready to go buy one of it's competitors, because Oculus decided to sell out to one of the most invasive companies in the world, who decided to leverage the technology to lure customers into giving them unrestricted access to everything on their computer.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    8. Re:DO NOT BUY by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Come on, that's not fair. Give them proper credit.

      They're an invasive, manipulative, dishonest, big data company.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    9. Re:DO NOT BUY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just use it on an offline machine?

  7. Oh for crying out loud! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wake up and smell the coffee, please, we're all doomed already because of our egotistical tendencies, and overly sociopathic managers and political leaders.

    eNjoy

  8. you what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Facebook" occulous rift.. wtf did that happen.. i thought the device was from dickstarter

    1. Re:you what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And over a year ago it was bought by them. Lots of stories on it, and even a few here. Any site where you would have heard about the Rift, would have covered it.

    2. Re:you what? by ZipK · · Score: 2
    3. Re:you what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember it well. A hugely successful Kickstarter campaign followed shortly by a $2 billion acquisition.

      There was some EXTREME butthurt over the whole thing from a tiny yet highly vocal group of people.

    4. Re: you what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh. thnkx. i filter fb crap

    5. Re:you what? by lucien86 · · Score: 1

      You thought you were buying something innovative and free and open and spent quite a bit of money on it, then learned a while latter that its owners had just sold out to Facebook. I'd say butthurt is exactly how I would feel.

      --
      Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  9. Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a list of reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things:

    1) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I sleep.

    2) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I pee.

    3) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I make kaka.

    4) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I pleasure myself.

    5) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I wash my body in the shower.

    6) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I relax in the tub.

    7) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I brush my teeth.

    8) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I make passionate love to my wife.

    9) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I brush my hair.

    10) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I read a book.

    11) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I read Slashdot.

    12) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I bake cake.

    13) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I put in my contact lenses.

    14) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I get ready to play golf.

    15) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I do my laundry.

    16) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I think about rugby.

    17) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I tie my shoes.

    18) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I celebrate the 4th of July.

    19) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I water my flowers.

    20) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I eat ham.

    21) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I use my stapler to staple documents.

    22) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I chew bubble gum.

    23) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I check the oil in my car.

    24) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I look for my TV remote.

    25) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I blow my nose.

    26) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I rearrange my stamp collection.

    27) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I listen to the Backstreet Boys.

    28) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I do my calisthenics.

    29) Internet of Things devices could watch me while I search for a paper clip.

    30) Internet of Things devices could send information about me to advertisers.

    31) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I sleep.

    32) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I pee.

    33) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I make kaka.

    34) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I pleasure myself.

    35) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I wash my body in the shower.

    36) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I relax in the tub.

    37) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I brush my teeth.

    38) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I make passionate love to my wife.

    39) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I brush my hair.

    40) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I read a book.

    41) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I read Slashdot.

    42) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly collected about me while I bake cake.

    43) Internet of Things devices could let advertisers use the data unsuspectingly coll

  10. uggh by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    Facebook is the worst thing that happened to Oculus.

    1. Re:uggh by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it might be the best thing to happen to Oculus' competition. ;)

    2. Re:uggh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is the worst thing.

      FTFY

  11. salacious? by ooloorie · · Score: 2

    I don't think that means what you think it means.

    1. Re:salacious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends what you do with your Oculus rift...

      [hint: in "Oculus", there is "culus", the Latin word for "arse"]

    2. Re:salacious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also "oculus", which is the Latin word for "eye".

  12. Surprised? No. More challenged. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    The exercise is now how to turn this into a device that YOU own.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Surprised? No. More challenged. by orledrat · · Score: 1

      But the hardware itself isn't even such a great step up from the previous prototypes/devkits, for example, the field-of-view seems to be lacking.

      Besides, Linux support has been dropped and Windows 10 is now required.

    2. Re:Surprised? No. More challenged. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the hardware itself isn't even such a great step up from the previous prototypes/devkits, for example, the field-of-view seems to be lacking.

      Besides, Linux support has been dropped and Windows 10 is now required.

      StarVR. Of all the many the only one with specs that indicate it might be usable at all.

      What exactly does the Oculus need a specific operation system for? Its two displays and some HIDs merged into a headset. Control should be by any specific software using it. What does the facebook software do?

    3. Re:Surprised? No. More challenged. by KGIII · · Score: 1

      > What does the facebook software do?

      From the sounds of things, it collects your data and monetizes it. The summary told me that. Why'd you ask? ;-)

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    4. Re:Surprised? No. More challenged. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      It is hardware. Hardware needs an interface to communicate with software. Reverse engineering has been a staple of the industry ever since Turing broke the Enigma.

      Windows 10 is not required. Their software requires it, not the hardware.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  13. I don't give a hoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you have a mobile phone? A Gmail account? You are being tracked already. Get over it. Why yes, I do own some FB stock.

    1. Re:I don't give a hoot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why yes, I do suck Fuckerberg's cock.

      FTFY.

  14. Time for legal action against FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stuff like that pisses me off. That and how my new phone has facebook stuff pre-installed that you can't remove. Hey FB I don't agree to your terms of service and I want this shit off my phone.

  15. The Horror by bfpierce · · Score: 1

    You mean I might have to get an ad blocker for my Oculus rift O/S? How terrible...

    Jesus you guys are worse than Tipper Gore.

    1. Re:The Horror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Morons who accept shit that's defective by design breed more shit that's defective by design.

      If it wasn't for morons like you we wouldn't have to use ad blockers at all, because there wouldn't be ads.

      We didn't used to have advertising on the Internet, until some fools thought there was actually such a thing as a free lunch.

    2. Re:The Horror by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Depending on what you're calling the 'net, there have pretty much always been ads on it. I'm not sure where that sentiment comes from - this mythical view of the past. Do you not remember the, "Call 555-1212 for the best BBS in town - best warez!" No? Probably not. You probably weren't there and are just parroting what you heard from a friend who heard it from a friend.

      Now, on the academic networks there weren't so many ads. However, there were still promotions. The first instance of UCE/spam was in something like 1978 and from DEC. I did have occasion to use a terminal that had access a network that was run by the DoD, back in the 1980s. That system is the only system that I personally experienced that had a lack of ads.

      To top it all off... Since sometime around 1996 (thereabouts) I've been blocking ads with one format or another. Yes, since about 1996. Statistically, it's likely that that was before you were even online. As a BBS operator, in the late 1980s and very early 1990s, I had people posting ads all the time. (That's the bulletin board part of it.)

      There were ads in Usenet, ads on Gopher, ads in email, ads in hypertext, and ads in hypercards. They were not as prolific but they existed. I have no idea why people perpetuate this myth that the ads are somehow new. Shit, there used to be ads in the MOTD. It was no unheard of to accept money in exchange for putting those ads in there. Err... Though the exchange of money was usually a bit more local or, more often than not, was based on something akin to reciprocity.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  16. Re: Calm Down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you watch VR porno with your oculus, they'll be able to use your movements to tell when you've run out of lube, and send you facefuck ads for a new vat of walrus grease. Not sure if want.

  17. "implications" hurrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't use it, then.

    1. Re:"implications" hurrr by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Would you make that "hurrr" sound in a verbal discussion?

    2. Re:"implications" hurrr by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If I were making fun of you or seeking termination of the conversation then, by all means, I'd vocalize that. I'd even make a funny face and look at them as if I were incredulous that such a person could speak without assistance, walk without hurting themselves or others, and was allowed to use the sharp scissors.

      On the other hand, I'd not vocalize that if my goal were to continue a conversation. (Unless it was a close friend who'd said something utterly stupid and I was having fun at their expense.) I'd not use it in a serious discussion, however.

      Why'd you ask?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    3. Re:"implications" hurrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why make a sound like that at all? What does it even mean? Is it from another language or something? How should someone know that you mean "I want to stop talking" when you say it?

    4. Re:"implications" hurrr by KGIII · · Score: 1

      In my case, it would make a sound like "burr" only with an H. Sort of like an Ebonics speaker may enunciate "her." Such accents would be found in the middle of the Eastern Coastal States.

      However, I'd pronounce it like I'd pronounce 'burr.

      I'm more likely to say "durr" or "derp." That dependson whom I'm communicating with an the ultimate goal of that effort.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  18. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook is a virus. Don't touch anything it touches.

  19. seems like Facebook wants to eradicate privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It seems like the purpose of Facebook is to eradicate privacy, wherever it may be. Loneliness, and hate speech are to be eradicated by big Facebook.

  20. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even better when people start disabling this background service only to later find their expensive toy no longer works thanks to this always on DRM.

  21. Facebook just ruined Oculus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHY does a VR headset driver need to talk to Facebook, or ANYTHING on the Internet? Does Facebook have to RUIN EVERYTHING GOOD?!?

    1. Re:Facebook just ruined Oculus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is water still wet?

  22. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is precisely why I lost all interest in Oculus the instant I heard that it had been acquired by Facebook.

  23. Re:Calm Down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure, Mark.

  24. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    this times a billion.

    i can't believe anyone thought it was going to turn out good with facebook owning it.
    you've gotta be fucking stupid to believe thats not going to turn into a shitshow.

    I fully expect within 5 years oculus will start doing something like 'watch this ad to continue playing your game with oculus'.

  25. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just wait til they start collecting data on all your interactions with VR porn... and posting your favorites on your page.

  26. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This, along with the insane costs, are why I never really batted much of an eye towards VR stuff even as it started to mature. After seeing facebook buy the rift, I knew exactly how it would end up.

    I'd fully expect the PS VR to do similar to be honest. And while I'll reserve judgement until I actually see it, Steam's Vive is probably going to do the same as well.

  27. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oculus was purchased by Facebook, what the hell did the "dumb fucks" think was going to happen?

    Trusting ((Zuckerberg))...
    Not even once.

  28. What a waste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the early 90's, I thought the Internet would be a transformative technology for humanity. I suppose it has been, but using the Internet as a tool to sell crap to people that they don't need is a waste of the potential the Internet offers us.

    1. Re:What a waste... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      The same could be said for most any other transforming technological advances. From radio to automobiles, to television to telephones, to printing to even speech.

      Why'd you expect it to be different this time? Did you think we, as a species, suddenly improved? You really don't think you're enlightened, do you? Do you really think that the species is somehow better, more advanced, or improved? Whatever gave you that idea?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  29. Re:Calm Down! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a brand new product and the designers would like to know more about how people use it (collecting data about movements and such) so they might improve upon it and potentially suggest new experiences to you (marketing and related companies). They might even pass that data along to application developers (third parties) so they can improve their content too.

    That's what internal testing is supposed to be about. By professional testers (including real usability and accessibility experts), by themselves, and through interviews with selected members of the public, who are volunteers for this specific task, and generally compensated in some way or another.

    After that, you are supposed to rely on manual reports by users. If really required, you can ask them to install some internal diagnostic tool, but that should be quite rare.

    It worked well enough for more than 30 years. And it's not as if things improved in the past five years, as incompetent statisticians and marketing imbeciles, with barely a basic mainstream computer culture (but much condescension and arrogance for geeks and specialists), have only been sabotaging the efforts of the previous generation... It's far from only being dumbing down and forced advertising through the destruction of all privacy... Many of the changes they brought about are just so plain stupid and incoherent, it is really the actual first step to a future idiocracy...

  30. Gullible Fool test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there ANYBODY with at least two brain cells who has not yet realized that anything connected with Zuckerberg/Facebook will be a privacy-killing spying manipulating sneaky scheme?

    A guy who became a billionaire by studying his users like bugs under a microscope and selling everything he learns about them, their friends, their families, etc to the highest bidders ---- has a new product that insidiously spies on its users and compromises the security of their computers?!?!? I'm SHOCKED! There's Gambling in the Casino!!

    If you are on Facebook, you have already proven you have no concerns about security or privacy and proven you have no common sense, so probably this Oculus news is nothing. If, however, you are smart enough not to be on Facebook, you need to be explaining to friends and relatives why they too should not be on it. Facebook is not only toxic and dangerous to the individual, it's also bad for the American middle class. Everything that enriches Zuck helps to fund his political action committees which are working very hard to weaken/eliminate limits on imported STEM workers which he and his buddies are using to push-down American wages.

  31. Then Don't let it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this the exact scenario for software firewalls? Block the process from connecting back to Facebook. It still has to function when there isn't a network connection, so you can sandbox it and still have it function. Problem solved.

  32. Re: Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1) You're a faggot.

  33. Re:Calm Down! by Immerman · · Score: 1

    Sure. But then Microsoft changed the game, and everybody else wants to get in on the action. I mean if people will tolerate their OS spying on them, surely they'll be willing to let something they actually care about spy too, right?

    Bleh.

    --
    --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
  34. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by davester666 · · Score: 1

    This isn't new. the last couple years, most new hardware, particularly stuff that connects to your phone or IoT devices are like this.

    fitness bands
    smart watches
    thermostats (like the Nest)
    ODB Readers
    Android OS/Windows 10

    Even though these devices could easily be managed so all data stays local, either on the device or on a smartphone, companies making them force all data to get uploaded to their servers so they "own" the data [fitbit in particular makes you pay an extra monthly fee to get access to the data you have generated], and let you access it via an app/web page, but also sell that data to anybody walking by with a spare dollar.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  35. Re:Reasons why I don't like the Internet of Things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When's the last time you left the house?

    Seriously, posts like that make you look fucking pathetic, which is a shame because the whole screaming out "a loser wrote this" format of your post is obscuring an important message.

  36. Serious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I don't have a Facebook account, does that mean I can't use my shiny new overpriced VR device?

    Some of us took a look around, saw nothing but Farmville, Mafia Wars, vapid assholes posting pictures of their coffee, and a privacy nightmare, and said, "Fuck this, I'm looking up the link to delete this account permanently," and we haven't looked back in many years.

  37. sc.exe config ServiceName start= demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sc.exe start ServiceName
    sc.exe stop ServiceName

    Wow, so fucking hard...Next?

  38. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Fallen+Kell · · Score: 1

    This is precisely why I lost all interest in Oculus the instant I heard that it had been acquired by Facebook.

    Same here. It is why I am glad there are several competing devices that are due out as well. That said, I am really waiting on one that has a decent field of view.

    --
    We were all warned a long time ago that MS products sucked, remember the Magic 8 Ball said, "Outlook not so good"
  39. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by gweihir · · Score: 1

    Indeed. And now we see why Facebook actually bought Occulus.

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  40. Re:Calm Down! by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Microsoft didn't change the game. They upped the ante. The game was already well into the end-game by the time Windows 10 rolled around.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  41. What was I thinking? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    Thought to myself the Rift is just a monitor stuffed with sensors. Surely I would be able to use it directly with third party software and avoid the inevitable facebook bullshit we all knew was coming. But noo... at the last f*cking second before release they did away with separate runtime downloads and make you install their shitstore + register an account before you even get access to the runtime.

    What is sad is how lame Oculus software is. They install very chatty poll happy windows services (managed code consuming ram like its going out of style 24x7), force you download gigabytes worth of BS bloatware you probably don't even care about with no resumption if download goes south and there is not even a way to tell software in which drive/folder it should be installed.

    Still have a preorder in queue I will cancel if a way to install runtime only without the BS does not materialize in the next month.

  42. "It turns out" by gavron · · Score: 1

    Thank you for once again rehashing FB's data sharing policy.
    I'm sorry when the rest of the world found out that FB shares data and uses it for marketing, and how's how they fund the free web services you choose to use, you were on the toilet or picking your nose or something.

    Nothing to see here.

    E
    P.S. "It turns out" is how you start a surprising conclusion to a story, not a an entire paragraph.

  43. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still remember how immensely disappointed I was when I heard the news that Oculus had been bought by Facebook.

  44. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    This, along with the insane costs, are why I never really batted much of an eye towards VR stuff even as it started to mature. After seeing facebook buy the rift, I knew exactly how it would end up.

    Ditto. Then I discovered that these things combine the worst of two things that didn't succeed - Kinect and 3DTVs. I mean, people hated Kinect because it forced them off the couch, and it appears most VR games have you moving in a space, so you not only needed the space Kinect required, but you have to get off. Or you ended up doing what most players did an sat on th e couch gesturing. PS VR seems to do the latter and Vive requires a space as well.

    Then the whole glasses thing is what killed 3DTVs, and yet people want to strap huge honking (and heavier than the glasses) headsets? Yes, the good ones are balanced, but still.

    Frankly, I think it's going to be like the scene in Tomorrowland where that girl walks in the alternate universe and runs into walls and stuff.

  45. Re:Calm Down! by lucien86 · · Score: 1

    . . .And I've got this Ethiopian Prince with some shares he wants to sell if your interested?

    Seriously this thing will take full video of everywhere you use it and of all the people around you. It will probably have microphones which will record everything you say. Its very easy to stich all that video together to make 360 picture files, translate speech into text then scan it with AI. Plus the pictures and video of the people will no doubt help make better dossiers of all your friends and family.

    Just another step towards full immersion observation. Always on 24 hours a day. Everyone afraid of their TV and computers and phones in case they say something that incriminates them. Gangs of children the most feared because they watch and report on everyone - in the original it was for party loyalty, today its for the likes. In both its because they are taught to hate and fear adults. Facebook is watching you. (sadly its true)

    --
    Below the speed of light Special Relativity is one of the most accurate theories in physics - above the speed of light..
  46. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SCHIZOPHRENICS want to see what you see through THIS to be certain YOU are the *source* of their hallucinations. Even if it is the residual transmission of your visual cortex what produces them, it is still hallucinations. But they want to find you.

  47. Re:Facebook collecting private data unnecessarily? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
    Me [counts] four.

    I believe that it's alleged to do something for games. Since I play an Elite clone (from 1981 or 1982), Sudoku (16x16), and Sid Meier's Civilisation from 1991 ... I'm wondering what effect a Rift would have on these?

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"