Slashdot Mirror
How To Hack an Election (bloomberg.com)
"For eight years, Andres Sepulveda, now 31, says he traveled the continent rigging major political campaigns..." writes Bloomberg, citing elections in Nicaragua, Panama, Honduras, El Salvador, Colombia, Mexico, Costa Rica, Guatemala, and Venezuela. Sepulveda says he was bankrolled by a political consultant in Miami, and his services involved everything from phone tapping and cracking donor databases to managing thousands of fake Twitter profiles. While Sepulveda wasn't always successful, in 2012, "He led a team of hackers that stole campaign strategies, manipulated social media to create false waves of enthusiasm and derision, and installed spyware in opposition offices, all to help Pena Nieto, a right-of-center candidate, eke out a victory." Now serving 10 years in prison in Colombia, Sepulveda is telling his story in hopes of a reduced sentence - and to warn the public that hackers are affecting modern elections, and that specialized skills will be need to stop them.
"On the question of whether the U.S. presidential campaign is being tampered with, he is unequivocal. 'I'm 100 percent sure it is'."
"On the question of whether the U.S. presidential campaign is being tampered with, he is unequivocal. 'I'm 100 percent sure it is'."
He was just a Researcher trying to expose vulnerabilities.
Tampering with elections is legal in the USA. It's ratified by Citizens United.
That's just regular spying, not actually changing the vote counts.
Someone said "hacking", so that's proof and everything. No need to bother with evidenca, deliberation, and all the rest, just lock'em up already. That law against "computer hacking" is very handy indeed. It's the only law you need!
You're citing journalism, which is basically the American version of Russia Today. Propaganda machine.
FTFY
I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
I'll say it....proper English will be a start.
"manipulated social media to create false waves of enthusiasm and derision"
Trump hired people to cheer at his rallies. Doesn't seem too much of a stretch to assume he does the same thing online too.
Why do you think Bernie Sanders' campaign is paying Tad Devine's group $800K a month? (And why Sanders doesn't require CVV codes for credit card donations?)
Since citizen united , money talk and win the US election. So fake twitter and getting some list in the grand scheme won't do much.
Money don't talk. They take oath and swear.
He's running against a Clinton. There are no rules.
How quaint. This has been going on since the very first vote.
How the dead voted for JFK. How ballot boxes of votes go missing or magically appear. How recent elections have had 100% PLUS turnout and nobody bats an eye.
Then you don't even NEED to game the ballots when you can just override the votes altogether has is happening to both Bernie and Trump by their respective political parties.
But whoa... yeah, watch out for sockpuppet accounts...
Sincerely
Silence Do Goode.
While nothing can be done about manipulation of the masses, except education.
Vote rigging and tampering is a problem that can be solved.
What it would require is a global standard for secure electronic voting.
https://www.democracycounts.org is trying to do just that.
The proposed standard covers everything from the development and verification of software (all opensource of course), to how machines are to be setup and configured as well as how to prevent tampering and hacking.
It provides an irrefutable record of the vote that can stand up to challenges in a court of law.
Right now they aren't talking so much about the standard they are trying to get through.
Right now they are just trying to draw enough attention to these exact problems so that they can gain critical mass. Speaking as someone who has helped them architect the solution, getting this system in front of ISO and hammering out a proper standard that is secure, verifiable, auditable and yet still allows for secret balloting, is the main thrust of what they are trying to accomplish.
I encourage you to visit them, checkout what they're about and become part of the discussion.
Now come on, it can't be that bad.
....the scandal is what's legal.
"Created False Waves of Enthusiasm and Derision"
So I take it he works as a DNC Super Delegate? Or maybe as a US media journalist or news agency.
Seems to be about all they are good for as they refuse to actually cover the news since they are too busy trying to twist it to what they wish it to be.
When it's just some excel file anyone with any USB stick can edit the results of?
Kinda feels like calling someone a pilot for having fallen off their roof.
That's just regular spying, not actually changing the vote counts.
Regular spying on opposition machines is not something you should be saying "just" about.
Mass manipulation of social media to change the political narrative at a given time is an incredibly powerful and insidious tool, and a window into what is going to happen with AI in elections a few decades away.
I voted in Arizona, didn't need a hacker to tell me that.
No hacking necessary, just need 5 bought and paid for conservative justices on the supreme court.
If you think the US elections are fair, you might read this article: http://www.salon.com/2016/04/0... We may have heard of gerrymandering, but what's happening in the USA, state by state, goes well beyond simple map-redrawing. I thought I was fairly politically literate, but was really shocked when I read this. And it's all apparently legitimate. That is to say it gives the appearance of being legal and it hasn't been challenged on court, that I know of, but it certainly belies the principle of "one person, one vote."
This guy is Barney Collier..
Maybe it's not quite as bad as Russia Today, but American Journalism is pretty bad. For example, if you're not living in America consider what you and most of your friends think of American conservatives based on what they hear from American media. And I understand. If I didn't pay careful attention to the news and get multiple sources because I'm an American, and if didn't live among many American conservatives, I too would think American conservatives are a bunch of hateful racist redneck dogmatic intolerant violence loving hillbillies based on what I see and hear on CNN, NPR, the Washington Post, the New York Times, ABC, CBS, and NBC.
Conservatives are as likely to be nice people as liberals. They donate more to charities than liberals. Believe it or not they love their children and care about their communities. And just like liberals some are very stupid and some are very intelligent. But you wouldn't know it from watching American journalism.
I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
In the very last paragraph: "But Rendón says he’s in talks with another leading U.S. presidential campaign—he wouldn’t say which—to begin working for it once the primaries wrap up and the general election begins." Gee, he said he won't work for Trump because he doesn't like him. Bernie would never stoop this low. Therefor, that leaves Hillary Clinton. Sounds like something she would do.
Calling Pena Nieto right-of-center really decreases my confidence in any part of the story.
Wait... I forgot...... Does Obama dump the screaming new born kids in the fire @ Bohemian Grove during the Cremation of Care Ritual , OR Just the High Priest? Drone The Grove 2016! Yes Grandma, for the last time there will be countless wave after wave of Drones flying above the Bohemian Grove streaming the Cremation of Care Ritual to YouTube and CNN, get over it and take your pills silly...
This is true. In fact the same thing is often said about Conservatives in congress. They are nice, likeable people when you get to know them. And yet the policies they support are still abhorrent and completely fitting the hateful racist redneck dogmatic intolerant violence loving hillbillies stereotype.
We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
The less a person knows about computer security and the ease by which these machines can be remotely controlled, the more they support Internet and electronic voting. It is a solid and unvarying equation.
It is fashionable to use iPads and smartphones to do things, but perhaps there is a significant value in spending the time to physically go to a polling place, be identified, and putting hand to paper. That should be the price of having a say in your future and the future of society. Is this too hard to do for the sake of accurate voting?