Slashdot Mirror


'Neural Bypass' Links Brain To Hand To Get Around Paralysis (ieee.org)

An anonymous reader writes: People who are paralyzed from a spinal cord injury still generate movement commands in their brains, but those commands can't travel down their spinal cords and peripheral nerves to reach their muscles. So biomedical engineers came up with a "neural bypass" to route brain signals around the roadblock. The system has just been demonstrated by a human patient for the first time. The patient has a brain implant to record signals from his motor cortex which are sent to a computer, where a decoder algorithm figures out which signals correspond to which specific imagined movements. It then sends a command to a sleeve of electrodes the patient wears on his forearm, which stimulates his muscles in precise patterns to produce the desired hand movement. The patient has already poured from a bottle, stirred with a swizzle stick, swiped a credit card, and played Guitar Hero.

37 comments

  1. Temporary Hope? by TexasDiaz · · Score: 0

    I wonder how long these patients get to "play" with the new toys they've been given access to. When the study is over, do they have to go back to where they were when they started? Or do they get to keep using the devices?

    1. Re:Temporary Hope? by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      I assume that if the study shows promise or is highly successful, the procedure and associated devices eventually go on the market and they can purchase one even if they don't get to keep the prototype.

    2. Re: Temporary Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy he gets to spend thousands on a device they needed his help to make.

    3. Re: Temporary Hope? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I imagine that they weren't really lacking for crippled people to try it out on. It's not like paralysis is a scare resource.

      They got a test subject, and this patient now has the ability to eventually get a device that will allow their paralysis to be overcome. Not a shitty deal, really.

    4. Re: Temporary Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter who they got, the person deserves pay.
      Do you do your job for free because they have other applicants?

    5. Re: Temporary Hope? by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      Oh boy he gets to spend thousands on a device they needed his help to make.

      Why do you think swiping a credit card was one of the first things they made sure worked?

    6. Re:Temporary Hope? by gweihir · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do not mistake this for a finished product. The main concern is that the implanted electrodes have a limited lifetime. It has gotten better, but it is still nowhere near "permanent". One of the motivation for such experiments is to find the minimal intrusiveness for the implanted electrodes that still allows them to record the signals with the required accuracy. Expect at least 10 more years and possibly much longer before the electrodes become long-term usable.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    7. Re: Temporary Hope? by Reteo+Varala · · Score: 1

      ...using the money they paid him to make it.

    8. Re: Temporary Hope? by Hylandr · · Score: 2

      For the hope of helping research like this I would gladly volunteer.

      If someone asked me to help test a procedure that would fix my knees I would be willing to pay some expenses myself, even if I didn't get to benefit in my lifetime.

      Why? Because not everyone in this world thinks about money, and I like opportunities to serve a 'greater good'.

      There's a good chance this test subject jumped at the chance to help. :)

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    9. Re:Temporary Hope? by Lotana · · Score: 1

      Alas, there is always a catch with these stories. It is no wonder that everyone here is a cynic. Hard to get excited about anything when there is always fine print saying "Not for another decade".

    10. Re:Temporary Hope? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is "reporters" and PR-people that feel they must make everything a world-shattering story. Of course, the other half of the problem is people that are ready believe such things. Even this /. thread if full of them.

      The story describes progress, but actual research takes time, often a lot of it and "brain/nerve interfaces" are still in an early stage. For example, Cochlea-Implants were pioneered in the 1960, are commonplace today, but still only have a lifetime of 15-20 years and need to be replaced after that.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    11. Re: Temporary Hope? by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance this test subject jumped at the chance to help. :)

      Wanna place a bet before we ask?

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    12. Re: Temporary Hope? by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      *Whoosh*

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    13. Re: Temporary Hope? by Lodlaiden · · Score: 1

      Whoosh right back at you. Using the phrase "jump at the chance" when referring to a paralyzed individual is like a blind person "seeing the light".

      --
      Suborbital [spaceflight] is the special olympics of spaceflight. - Rei
    14. Re: Temporary Hope? by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Then we concur that a paralyzed person can jump at a something or a blind person can see the light.

      Figuratively speaking of course. Gotta love Idioms. :)

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  2. Wrong spot to hook up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't the transmitter/receiver pair be placed on either side of the injury? Basically to bridge the gap.

    Still very cool (and I'm likely wrong on how it ought to work)

  3. Surrogate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kind of a large leap, but could they eventually use this to connect parapalegics to brain dead surrogates?

    1. Re:Surrogate by psyclone · · Score: 1

      That's a crazy idea: that you could be a puppeteer of a "vegetable".

      Presumably a fully-able human could do this through VR on some sort of omnidirectional treadmill. (The "puppet" would walk around and do things, but possibly controlled by someone far away.)

      Yes, it's way easier to do this with a robot, but consider the creepy factor. Or perhaps even control someone that is drugged in the right way...

    2. Re:Surrogate by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Kind of a large leap, but could they eventually use this to connect parapalegics to brain dead surrogates?

      At Last! A way to re-animate Congress!

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    3. Re:Surrogate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, you would run out of brain dead surrogates quickly. I'm looking forward to surrogate homeless people in boardrooms. And by homeless people: I mean "liberal arts majors".

    4. Re:Surrogate by Alumoi · · Score: 1

      Presumably a fully-able human could do this through VR on some sort of omnidirectional treadmill. (The "puppet" would walk around and do things, but possibly controlled by someone far away.)

      You mean like the corporations and politicians? They are already doing this.

    5. Re:Surrogate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The technical term is "ghost hack".

    6. Re:Surrogate by muecksteiner · · Score: 1

      Even if you could, the connection aspect would not be your only worry. Brain death usually leads to death of the remaining body in fairly short order, due to complications from a fairly large piece of decaying goo in the former person's skull. The rest of the body goes on, but those brain cells are dead, and start decaying. Presumably, one could actively remove the dead brain tissue, and fill the cavity with the connections needed for the ghola to work (to make an inaccurate Dune reference). Still. Science fiction, for now.

    7. Re:Surrogate by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Even if you could, the connection aspect would not be your only worry. Brain death usually leads to death of the remaining body in fairly short order, due to complications from a fairly large piece of decaying goo in the former person's skull. The rest of the body goes on, but those brain cells are dead, and start decaying.

      I was under the impression that with heart-lung machines, tube feeding etc. they could keep patients with very little to no brain activity alive for quite some time, but doctors just pull the plug because there's nobody home. From what I understand they don't operate out dead goo even when people have had massive brain strokes, the dead parts are just gone. Is that wrong? Has there been any actual research on keeping the brain dead "alive"?

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  4. Obligatory /. comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correlation does not imply causation.

  5. Obligatory by Narcocide · · Score: 1

    But if you use this to masturbate, does it feel like a stranger?

    1. Re:Obligatory by psyclone · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of those paralyzed below the waist and how this tech is needed not for their arms but between their legs.

    2. Re:Obligatory by oic0 · · Score: 1

      Didn't see feeling mentioned, just control. Making it dance isn't very life changing.

  6. The real fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is being able to self-cuckold by banging your wife with somebody else's body.

    I'm sure there would be a market for this. Imagine if you could get a steady supply of DDF 'braindead' corpses from repressive regimes across the globe. Productize these 'vegetables' or 'zombie people' by installing neural chips triggering signals in their lower brain/spine, either replace their eyes with webcams, or tap directly into their optic nerves for realtime streaming to your VR headset or visual override neural implant.

    1. Re:The real fun... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's not going to be that useful until you can transport the sensations back across the internet. Problem is, when they invent that tech, they're just going to use it to let people stay home and blow themselves and there goes civilization...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The real fun... by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      "Honey? Can we use the cadaver again?"

      This is a whole new world of necrophilia

  7. Body control by jandersen · · Score: 1

    One part of this consist in controlling a body's movements with an external device - the fact that this device is in turn controlled by the brain occupying the body is another part, but it doesn't have to be that way, obviously. IOW, it is now possible, if not easy, to take control of other people's bodies. Just imagine the potential; it isn't all good.

  8. Cyborgs are comming.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this technology is used for good an not evil. I'd imagine life is going to imitate art. RoboCops here we come.

  9. A future of zombies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see the 1% using this technology to control their workforce in the future. No need for expensive robots, just a zombie like workforce.

  10. A Race by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Just about the time that this neural bypass becomes practical there will probably be a way to regenerate broken nerves. Technology floats a lot of new boats and those boats seem to rise about the same time.

  11. Think of Rey by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

    "But what about...?"

    "I'd try it out on a hot dog first."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.