Slashdot Mirror


New 'Tunneling' State of Water Molecules Discovered by Scientists (inhabitat.com)

MikeChino quotes a report from Inhabitat: Scientists just discovered a new state of water molecules that displays some pretty unexpected characteristics. This discovery, made by researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), reveals that water molecules "tunnel" in ultra-small hexagonal channels (measuring only 5 angstrom across) of the mineral beryl. Basically, this means the molecules spread out when they are trapped in confined spaces, taking a new shape entirely. The ORNL used neutron scattering and computational modeling to reveal the "tunneling" state of water that breaks the rules of known fundamentals seen in gas, liquid, or solid state. The researchers said the discovery describes the behavior of water molecules present in tightly confined areas such as cell walls, soils, and rocks. The study was published in Physical Review Letters on April 22.

60 comments

  1. Re:More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    guys, it's time to stop trying. a random guy on the internet doesn't see the usefulness to your discovery, so it's time to pack it in. Unless you're making a new battery, he's not interested.

  2. Re:More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh man, not again!

  3. Re:More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Unless you're making a new battery, he's not interested.

    new and improved battery you mean...

  4. Neat. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neat.

  5. They're late to the party... by jurgen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Professor Gerald Pollack at University of Washington has been studying exactly this "new state" of water for over a decade and has written a very good book about it... http://www.amazon.com/Gerald-H...

    1. Re:They're late to the party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      EEP. Wrong. Professor Gerald Pollack has a series of pseudoscientific theories about how water reaches a new state on *almost all surfaces*. This theory is widely approved by sites such as mercola.com and other altie quick-cash-in sites.

      There is 0 relation to this actual scientific discovery about how water changes to a new state "while restricted in a mineral beryl with hexagonal ultra-small channels that measures only 5 angstrom across".

      Please Slashdot, +5 interesting?

    2. Re:They're late to the party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He seems to be published and cited in research relating to his books, according to Google Scholar, so perhaps you could take your assertations to the journals, support them (as you have not done here), and have his papers retracted.

    3. Re:They're late to the party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right, if you don't have his papers retracted from the journals they were published in, you clearly lose the argument.

    4. Re:They're late to the party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. That's sorted, then.

  6. Re:More useless sci-fi by TryingToBeUseful · · Score: 1

    >> guys, it's time to stop trying. a random guy on the internet doesn't see the usefulness to your discovery, so it's time to pack it in.

    <3

  7. XXX by qvatch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is this just a new form of 'square ice' http://www.nature.com/nature/j... , which was also supposed to have interesting flow properties?

  8. How by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    “At low temperatures, this tunneling water exhibits quantum motion through the separating potential walls, which is forbidden in the classical world,” said lead author Alexander Kolesnikov of ORNL’s Chemical and Engineering Materials Division. “This means that the oxygen and hydrogen atoms of the water molecule are ‘delocalized’ and therefore simultaneously present in all six symmetrically equivalent positions in the channel at the same time. It’s one of those phenomena that only occur in quantum mechanics and has no parallel in our everyday experience.”

    From my simplistic understanding of quantum mechanics, this means the atoms weren't "observing" each other and therefore had probabilistic locations. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:How by rmdingler · · Score: 2, Informative

      atoms weren't "observing" each other

      Perhaps it's your observation that affects the outcome.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... tunneling water exhibits ... motion through the separating potential walls, which is forbidden in the classical world ... oxygen and hydrogen atoms of the water molecule are ‘delocalized’ and therefore simultaneously present in all six symmetrically equivalent positions in the channel at the same time

      ... the atoms weren't "observing" each other ...

      So basically they've discovered that H and O atoms like to use quantum-molecular gloryholes?

  9. Old news by Trachman · · Score: 3, Funny

    My neighbor has noticed this phenomena ten years ago.

    When he was drunk and was peeing in the middle of the parking lot, he noticed that splashes do resemble pattern, as shown in scientific article.

    Scientific article also says that water is "...simultaneously present in all six symmetrically equivalent positions". My neighbor noticed he peed all over his shoes and splashes where everywhere.Spot on match description of quantum behavior.

    Opportunity to nab a Nobel price lost. Again.

    1. Re:Old news by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2

      My neighbor has noticed this phenomena ten years ago.

      When he was drunk and was peeing in the middle of the parking lot, he noticed that splashes do resemble pattern, as shown in scientific article.

      Scientific article also says that water is "...simultaneously present in all six symmetrically equivalent positions". My neighbor noticed he peed all over his shoes and splashes where everywhere.Spot on match description of quantum behavior.

      Opportunity to nab a Nobel price lost. Again.

      He should drink more.

      Also, snowflakes are usually hexagonal in morphology.

      Water is a polar molecule, after all. (That was not a pun.)

    2. Re:Old news by kkoo · · Score: 1

      He'd have won a Nobel prize if instead of car park he'd been outstanding in his field.

    3. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Water is a polar molecule, after all. (That was not a pun.)"
      H(sub 2)O Water is Polar, but not all Water is H(sub 2)O. At the Femtosecond time level, Hydrogen and Oxygen form all sorts of short-lived combinations, some more polar than others.
      Neutrons are too heavy and slow to probe this, instead, Guo and others at Berkeley are using RIXS. (Note that accurately, this technique should be called RXIS, but that word is damn near unpronounceable. Guo's endstation is called Wet-RIXS, which _is_ a pun, because keeping the Water samples from leaking into UHV is quite a task. The thin windows not only have to be incredibly strong and transparent to the Photons, they also have to be non-reactive to the molecules under investigation. How do I know all this? Back in 2008, I coined the term Wet-RIXS. Well, it was funny at the time...)

    4. Re: Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Literally pissed away lol.

    5. Re:Old news by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      "Water is a polar molecule, after all. (That was not a pun.)"
      H(sub 2)O Water is Polar, but not all Water is H(sub 2)O. At the Femtosecond time level, Hydrogen and Oxygen form all sorts of short-lived combinations, some more polar than others.

      OK, fine, nit-picker. Quantum fluctuations.

      ... and others at Berkeley are using RIXS. ... Guo's endstation is called Wet-RIXS, which _is_ a pun, because keeping the Water samples from leaking into UHV is quite a task.

      Can you please define your acronym? I am too lazy to type "www.lmgtfy.com/RIXS".

      And yeah, water is the biggest enemy of UHV systems. Aside from grad students who don't wear gloves, that is...

    6. Re:Old news by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      And yeah, water is the biggest enemy of UHV systems. Aside from grad students who don't wear gloves, that is...

      Oh, just yesterday, a nice Nature article came out regarding room-temperature observation of 'square ice', stabilized by its encapsulation between two 1-ML sheets of graphene, which also kept the water from ruining the vacuum.

      doi:10.1038/nature14295

      Although I don't believe their 'multiple scattering' mention regarding the EELS work – in a sample 5 atomic layers thick?!? – it's a decent paper nonetheless.

    7. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, fine, nit-picker. Quantum fluctuations.

      Not the same AC, but those aren't quantum fluctuations. Various transient states in chemistry can have a strong impact on reactions and can be long lived in extreme cases (e.g. in very rarefied forms in nebulae).

  10. Re:More useless sci-fi by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1, Informative

    Where is some kind of useful application for this? Anything? I'm listening.

    I know I'm responding to a troll with this but: this is as far as I'm aware the first instance we've had even a hint of a way to make a channel which conducts whole atoms tunneling around in a circle while traveling along it (pretty much like a wire conducts electrons for electricity.) Will it be of use? Most likely there will at least be a niche device or two to come out of it, most interesting things at least have that. The really interesting thing will be to see what happens when you make it into a long tube and pump water through it, or into a coil shape and see what happens when you pump water through it. It might have microfluidic uses, it might have uses stemming from so much tunneling of things larger than electrons (which alone gave us the transistor for the computer you're using now.) It might be nothing other than an oddity people muse at. That's science, we poke things until they do things then figure out how to apply those things to do other things.

  11. Linked article is terribly stupidifying by Sir+Holo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    PLEASE: Don't click the click-bait article.

    It is completely ignorant and wrong-headed in most every way imaginable.

    Other Commenters have noted the decade+ work of others on this.

    Let us go further back in time. Every object has a wavelength (and a limit on precise knowledge of its velocity). It also has a limitation on the precision with which one can determine its location. Yes, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

    Everything is a cloud of probability with regards to its exact position. Quantum Mechanics does not disappear in the continuum regime. The reality is that such effects are drowned out by other signals, or are imperceptible at the macro (or even micro) scale.

    Oh, FFS, just use Wikipedia and look up "wave-particle duality".

    Thomson did it with the electron. Einstein did it with the photon. I did it with the phonon. And apparently, per Comments above, Gerald Pollack did it with water – a HUGE hadron-mass (molecule of three atoms).

    Ignore the click-bait article.

    1. Re: Linked article is terribly stupidifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did it for the phonon? I wasn't aware any of those that did the early work with phonons from the 1930s were still alive...

    2. Re:Linked article is terribly stupidifying by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

      How is this +5 insightful? What in the article said that QM didn't apply to this? So many nutjobs flock to these articles! I'm the only non-nutjob here I think.

    3. Re:Linked article is terribly stupidifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they linked to a clickbait aggregator that had picked up from the relatively clean APS site at http://phys.org/news/2016-04-state-molecule.html
      Hey, Slashdot: most of these clickbait aggregators are repeat offenders. You, /., are encouraging this craptastic clickbait-wrapping echo chamber by promulgating for them. Instead, why not fix your submission ratings and add a new tag to mark proposals as "clickbait", "echo" or "wrongsource". Then there's the problem of user accounts who serially spam articles from their own aggregators.

    4. Re:Linked article is terribly stupidifying by skaralic · · Score: 1

      Yes, the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

      Everything is a cloud of probability with regards to its exact position.

      Everything's got to be in The Cloud these days... :-/

    5. Re:Linked article is terribly stupidifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...a HUGE hadron-mass

      That can be hilariously misread >.

    6. Re: Linked article is terribly stupidifying by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      You did it for the phonon? I wasn't aware any of those that did the early work with phonons from the 1930s were still alive...

      I was about 100 years too late to the party. Ah well...

    7. Re:Linked article is terribly stupidifying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people are just proud to have finished highschool and need to flaunt their side-reading.

  12. Re:More useless sci-fi by Sir+Holo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Gotta get dem grants, am I right? Where is some kind of useful application for this? Anything? I'm listening. Too bad "science" nowadays means writing pieces of science fiction for some big wig who'll throw money at you instead of you know, actually inventing something useful or innovating. Actual innovation is now punished with lawsuits and copyright infringement notices.

    Agreed.

    This is precisely the reason that I am getting out of "science" completely.

    I have grown tired of being an intellectual leader, only to suffer intellectual rape at every turn.

    As that Eisenstein Guy said, "Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing that I know."

  13. Re:More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fellow Holographer?

  14. Related to this phenomenon, perhaps? by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Palladium has long been noted to be capable of absorbing large amounts of hydrogen:

    https://www.technologyreview.c...

    1. Re:Related to this phenomenon, perhaps? by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

      Yes. Because water and beryl are the same elements as palladium and hydrogen. It also is related to missing Dark Matter, black holes, time travel and the Time Cube.

    2. Re:Related to this phenomenon, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a regular subscriber to www.timecube.com updates. You do not need an ad-blocker to browse there.

  15. Re: More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah exactly! E=mc^2, where's the practical use for that? Theoretical foundations, who needs that?

    Seriously though, what's wrong with people nowadays? Without research into things that _don't_ have readily apparent uses there's no progress. I mean come on why did Ampere and his friends play with frog legs? No practical use whatsoever. Who needs this "electricity thing". Nothing practical.

  16. countdown 5...4...3...2....1 by cas2000 · · Score: 2

    This discovery will inevitably be garbled and abused by pseudo-science charlatans to promote highly profitable bullshit like homeopathy.

    I can see it now:

    "tunneling" is how "water memory" works, which is why no-one's ever actually seen it or proved its existence. Until now!

    1. Re:countdown 5...4...3...2....1 by mrbester · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't for this tunneling, there wouldn't be all those drugs smuggled into America. Isn't there some kind of quantum barrier, like a wall, we can build?

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    2. Re:countdown 5...4...3...2....1 by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I was going to say. They'll run with this even though most elements and compounds involved in homeopathy aren't crystalline in nature like Beryllium.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    3. Re:countdown 5...4...3...2....1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but TFA says their experiments prove QM tunneling will occur regardless of the quantum barrier, like a wall, present.

  17. Re: More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most science grants are approved by scientists, not some big wigs who can't tell the difference between science and fiction. And most of the remaining projects are granted money based on pork, regardless of the non-scientists' view of pie in the sky ideas.

  18. Kurt would be proud by Alypius · · Score: 1

    As long as it's not ice-9.

  19. Ordered Water by Fragnet · · Score: 1

    In the early 1990's I read a couple of books by Roger Penrose, The Emperor's New Mind and Shadows of the Mind. In these books Penrose speculated about something called Ordered Water, present in the microtubules of the cytoskeleton of neurons in the brain - possibly forming some kind of Bose-Einstein Condensate. Is this a similar kind of thing?

  20. Ice nine by hughbar · · Score: 1

    Here we come: http://www.urbandictionary.com... bloody scientists messing about with nature. No good will ever come of it I tell you.

    --
    On y va, qui mal y pense!
  21. so ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does this mean we do not need dark matter anymore ?

  22. Re:More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be really painful to be you, to know how shitty you are.

  23. Re: More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ice-nine

  24. Nice by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    For once they are in the news not for having lost their harddrives on trains, benches or just lying around in hallways.

  25. Seriously, who didn't know that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've known this ever since I was little and would get a glass of ice water, within a few minutes the outside of the glass was wet.

    I later learned the real reason.

  26. And others did it with atoms and molecules by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I remember darkly 2 to 3 decades ago teams at some university difracting some small amine molecules in a rudbidyum crystal. Similar problem & effects.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:And others did it with atoms and molecules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: "rudbidyum"

      Is that the hot new Asian fusion restaurant down the way?

  27. Here We Go Again by macs4all · · Score: 1

    This sounds suspiciously like the claims for "PolyWater", a magical form of water that I first saw mention of in Popular Science magazine in the early 1970s.

    It turned out to be the result of impurities in the water.

    1. Re: Here We Go Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nothing like polywater considering this is a subtle effect inline with predictions from QM and not something huge effect counter to previous knowledge.

    2. Re:Here We Go Again by ZorglubZ · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to start quoting Whitesnake! Then I realized it would've been "I", not "We"... Disappointed! :-/

    3. Re:Here We Go Again by macs4all · · Score: 1

      I thought you were going to start quoting Whitesnake! Then I realized it would've been "I", not "We"... Disappointed! :-/

      LOL, Sorry! I hate that song. ;-)

  28. Re: More useless sci-fi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah exactly! E=mc^2, where's the practical use for that?

    Many people aren't aware that getting GPS working properly requires relativity.

  29. Re:More useless sci-fi by blue+trane · · Score: 1

    It disproves Thermodynamic predictions, again.

    Isn't it a bit odd that such an abundant and important substance as water has no equation of state? And it just got weirder. Thermodynamic laws predict simplicity and smooth entropy gain but that fails even for water.

    Thermodynamics is dead. Give it up. Find another way to be mean to poors.

  30. Re: More useless sci-fi by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

    You missed the point of my Comment entirely.