Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Criticize New DAO Ethereum VC Fund (softpedia.com)

Three cryptocurrency experts published a scientific paper Friday detailing seven attacks that could influence how the Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) allocates its Ether funds. An anonymous Slashdot reader writes, "Coincidentally or not, they released their work with one day before funding for the DAO closed, and not surprisingly, Ether's price went down, devaluing the DAO from $150 million to $132 million."

From Softpedia: DAO is a crowdfunded project that works on the Ethereum network, a new crypto-currency network that deals with crypto-currency named Ether, which many experts say is better than Bitcoin's blockchain... Investors can submit funding proposals, on which the DAO users vote by submitting some of their tokens and a YES/NO vote. In the end, based on the tokens and YES/NO votes, the DAO's computer program decides on the outcome.
Softpedia reports that the paper released Friday also suggests a series of mitigations to a design they say will "incentivize investors to behave strategically; that is, at odds with truthful voting on their preferences."

39 comments

  1. LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bitcoin's "success" (if you can call it that) is related directly to its algorithm which to this day is unbroken.

    Any new system is subject to crazy ridiculous review, obviously. No one, I mean no one accepts this new system for anything. The fact that it made a Slashdot front page is pure greed (in terms of Slashdot whores) and means nothing whatsoever. Sorry I'm just an AC dope with no knowledge. Continue on, morons.

    1. Re: LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin has nowhere near as robust of a smart contract language that eth has. Eth and bitcoin are really different crypto platforms. Eth can act as a cryptocurrency but it's power lies in its distributed compute platform. I can write a program that executes across the eth chain that cannot be modified by any one node (needs consensus like bitcoin). This paves the way for a way more robust and flexible system to implement things like deadman's switches, drm that will survive long after the content is no longer wanted, or even corporate voting rights.

      In typical slashdot fashion I have not rtfa, but I can bet half of the attacks are against public contracts. Sucks for drm, but doesn't impact a deadman switch or corporate voting because the attackers will either be yourself or your partners who you can easily trace (cryptocurrency is far from anonymous and actually increases tracability)

    2. Re: LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A shitcoin by any other name is a shitcoin all the same.

    3. Re: LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can write a program that executes across the eth chain

      What the fuck does that even mean? Are you pulling fake money out of your asshole like the insufferable bitcoin losers?

    4. Re: LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      crypto-currency named Ether

      I guess it's named for where your money disappears.

    5. Re: LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's a distributed compute platform you dimwit.

    6. Re:LOL, bitcoin is proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin is proven to have blockchain problems, slow transactions, etc. Ethereum can overcome all of that. The smart money is on converting BTC to eth . . .actually, the best time to do that was about 6 months ago. But even today, it will prove out. Bitcoin is having to fork in order to survive, and that may not be all roses.

  2. Impact by mystuff · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not everyday that a scientific publication has an impact of $18 million.

    It's also not everyday that you see a scientific publication entirely drawn up in Google Docs, let see if they can organize a peer review process this way.

    Interesting excerpt from the work:

    Among the current DAO investors, there is already a whale who invested 888,888 Ether. This investor currently commands 7.7% of all outstanding votes in The DAO. For a proposal that requires only a 20% quorum, this investor already has 77% of the required YES votes to pass the proposal, and just needs to conspire with 2.3% of the token holders, in return for paying the conspirators out from the stolen funds.

    1. Re:Impact by DRJlaw · · Score: 0

      Among the current DAO investors, there is already a whale who invested 888,888 Ether. This investor currently commands 7.7% of all outstanding votes in The DAO. For a proposal that requires only a 20% quorum, this investor already has 77% of the required YES votes to pass the proposal, and just needs to conspire with 2.3% of the token holders, in return for paying the conspirators out from the stolen funds.

      I completely trust "researchers" who fail to catch that the difference between 7.7% and 20% is not 2.3%, but 12.3%, resulting in that investor having only ~33% of the required votes. These are the sort of detail oriented, fully considered citicisms I expect when millions of dollars are potentially involved.

    2. Re:Impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're the one who is confused/wrong?

      Based on that description, there's one investor with "7.7% of all outstanding votes".

      But this investor would only need to "conspire with 2.3% of the token holders".

      Do you see the difference? One percentage is measuring "outstanding votes". The other is measuring "token holders".

      Presumably those 2.3% of the "token holders" wouldn't have only 2.3% of the "outstanding votes".

      So maybe that's why the one investor, in collaboration with these other investors who may also have a disproportionately large number of "outstanding votes", could have such control.

    3. Re:Impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm pretty sure that DRJlaw's actual mistake is in thinking that the 20% quorum means that 20% of the votes have to be YES, when in reality only the majority of the quorum (anything over 10%) is required to have the proposal funded.

    4. Re: Impact by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. I just wanted to add that the 2.3% group of conspirators would only work out if exactly 10% of the remaining DAO voted. Should say 50% of the entire DAO vote, and assuming the deal was so obviously a scam that all non-conspirators voted no, then the 7.7% holder would have conspire with 17.3% of DAO holders.

    5. Re:Impact by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 1

      For a 20% quora you need a majority of the votes or 10+% of the total votes. So 7.7% is 77% of the votes needed to be the majority of the 20%.

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    6. Re:Impact by DRJlaw · · Score: 1

      Yes and no.

      Yes, you only require 2.3% of the votes in a 20% participation quorum to be "yes" votes to have a majority of the quorum.

      No, in the sense that non-participation in the quorum is, in effect, an implied "no" vote which means that the proper strategy for "no" voters is not to participate in voting on a proposal at all unless the "yes" side can achieve at least a 20% participation rate by itself.

      The analysis assumes that the "conspirator" side acts ultra-strategically and the "non-conspirator" side not only acts non-strategically, but can be counted upon to participate just enough to meet the quorum requirement without being a majority no. That's essentially impossible. The "conspirator" side thus has to recruit most if not all of a 20% quorum to vote yes while minimizing the publicity of the issue, or else achieve a majority of the probable -- not minimum -- quorum.

    7. Re:Impact by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      888888? Must be Chinese.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  3. I can't wait for this latest tech bubble to burst. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Holy shit, I can't wait for this latest tech bubble to burst. Really, what has it given us that's beneficial? Social media is all about collecting our private data and using it to advertise to us. Web 2.0 is all about destroying website user interfaces and bloating our browsers with all sorts of useless functionality, much of it which can be used to track us. Mobile devices are also about tracking us. Bitcoin is just a waste of electricity, and an enabler of criminal commerce. Linux has gotten worse thanks to systemd. Windows has gotten worse thanks to the Metro UI, or whatever they're calling it these days. The Rust and Go programming languages are a regression from C++98. Now there's this Ethereum and DAO gibberish, whatever the fuck it actually is, which sounds just about as useless as Bitcoin is.

    It's like we were making real technological progress for years, then we hit a brick wall and it all stopped. All we've gotten since is wasteful, useless, invasive crap. I hope this bubble bursts soon, and I hope that the next generation is able to undo the damage that the Millennials/Hipsters have done. Hopefully the youngsters can learn from the mistakes of this most recent bubble.

  4. Re:I can't wait for this latest tech bubble to bur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the Millenials have ADD. Laugh all you want but that explains all the problems.

  5. Can someone explain this in English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This may be the first time I've ever read a Slashdot summary and come away with no fucking idea what's going on. What is Ethereum, some kind of hanger on to Bitcoin? Why are people using it to vote? How long before the DAO is DOA? What?

    1. Re: Can someone explain this in English? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Distributed computing that requires a majority network consensus of the result from assembler-like opcodes.

      It's a bit more complex than that, but that should get you started. Google is your best friend

  6. You want truth or money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pick one...

  7. What the fuck is with the name "Ethereum"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's just me, but when I read the name "Ethereum", the first thing I think of is "delirium".

    It reminds me of "Dwolla", which always made me think of "doula".

    Then there was "Gowalla", which reminded me of "Dwolla", which reminded me of "doula".

    And finally there's "systemd", which makes me think of "dysentery".

    1. Re:What the fuck is with the name "Ethereum"? by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      It's only you. You're probably desxlyic.

  8. Harry Belafonte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    DAO
    Its a day-eee-ooh
    Daylight come and we wan go home

    1. Re: Harry Belafonte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight.. Surely you mean Sliverlight? By wan I assume you mean wide area network, and aren't we supposed to be using Rust rather than Go. This Belafonte guy needs to work on his sales pitch if he wants "Tallyman" to invest in Bananas

  9. Never give a sucker an even break by PopeRatzo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    DAO is a crowdfunded project that works on the Ethereum network, a new crypto-currency network that deals with crypto-currency named Ether

    One born every minute.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  10. Crowdsourcing which deals get funded? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the worst idea ever. Not only is Ether questionably better than Bitcoin, but then the crowd gets to vote on which deals get funded? The crowd is historically behind the times and poorly educated about a real deal, so this sounds like a complete waste of money.

  11. Someone had a joke and so many missed it by dbIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An unbacked "currency" called Ether and so many people taking it seriously?

    1. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you name a currency that is backed? And I don't mean by the good faith and credit of the issuing institution, just look at Zimbabwe and Venezuela for examples of how currency backed by "good faith and credit" turns out in the long run.
      Go ahead, name a single currency backed by anything that isn't blind faith in the issuer. I'll wait.

    2. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold coins? Silver coins?

    3. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by dbIII · · Score: 1

      name a single currency backed by anything that isn't blind faith in the issuer

      That is kind of the entire point. A currency is based on trust that the issuer can keep promises (and if they don't you know where they live). An unbacked currency has nobody to keep a promise.

    4. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not unbacked. It's backed by strong encryption.

    5. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by ultranova · · Score: 1

      A currency is based on trust that the issuer can keep promises (and if they don't you know where they live).

      What promises does the USA make about the dollar, and what, exactly speaking, can I do if it decides to break them?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    6. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold and Silver, whether in coin or bullion are not currency. Currency is something you can trade directly for what you want/need, commodity is something you have to first trade into currency in order to obtain what you need.

      There are some gold & silver coins which are stamped with a nominal dollar value, but good luck even getting the government that issued them to accept them at face value. Try going into your local court house and paying that $50 parking ticket with one of your $50 gold coins. Then tell me it's really backed by gold or silver.

      If gold and silver are currency then so are chickens, cows and coffee beans.

    7. Re:Someone had a joke and so many missed it by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Are you really paying so little attention to the world around you that I have to answer that? If you don't trust your country even that much then flee, because your life depends on living in a trustworthy country.

  12. Re:I can't wait for this latest tech bubble to bur by KramberryKoncerto · · Score: 2

    You mean faster computers that actually power incredible computing pursuits? You know, those that actually run difficult algorithms for science rather than spending most of their CPU time on GUIs and making SQL queries in run-of-the-mill business software that you're probably writing for food.
    You mean recent advances in machine learning, including a wide variety of applications in computer vision and natural language processing, more or less due to increased architectural support (improved database systems, distributed computing) and better algorithms?
    You mean the considerably less-wasteful Bitcoin alternatives that can actually be better than a large part of the bloated and widely inefficient banking infrastructure?
    You mean the abundance of information and knowledge on the internet, coupled with ever increasing capabilities to sift through useless content, and much easier scientific dissemination and collaboration?
    You mean Linux that had very specific hardware requirements, but actually gained enough commercial support to get actual drivers?
    You mean the better awareness of IP issues and maturing business models that support open source software?

    I'm not saying it's a good state that a lot of these businesses rely on advertising and foolish VC money, which IMO are on the decline. But let's not equate advancing technology to running businesses. Looks like somebody just couldn't catch up with the world.

  13. Can someone say "Arrow's Impossibility Theorem" by Vryl · · Score: 2

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... aka "There ain't no such thing as a fair election"...

  14. Compute Coin Hucksterism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ethereum is a computing token, not a store of value. ETH tokens are consumed doing computing operations, which allows the running of distributed apps. The actual use-case for ETH is small, since examples are sparse and there hasn't been any rapid uptake from the business community at large.

    Enter the Decentralized Autonomous Organization, the DAO. This is a pile of money with zero plan, and the game theory incentivizes you NOT to vote, because then your money isn't locked up into a proposal for an indefinite time period. Combine this with a proof-of-stake kind of voting, and you've recreated the worst parts of the legacy currency system (he who has the most money makes the rules) with the gentle tyranny of a large holder calling the shots.

    ETH also has the problem of competing with cost-per-cpu-cycle and cloud-computing resources, where many offerings are very inexpensive and open-source alternatives are abundant. The long-term economic pressure on the "pricing" of ETH is going to be lower, just by the simple fact that there's 80 million units, with ample facility to create more tokens. (And they must be created, after all they are consumed in operations.)

    While interesting from a distributed standpoint, there are other simpler ways to spin up a cluster without having to resort to some esoteric token system. In the end, that is ETH's greatest problem, they are trying to solve a "problem" that doesn't exist, ie., there is no central cabal of computing power that prevents someone from creating their own computing clusters, or hooking them all up via the internet.

  15. Ethereum != DAO, necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you needed to use eth to invest in the DAO. It does not mean you had to invest in the DAO. It's still useful as a cryptocurrency on its own, plus much much more as others have articulated.

    Even though the value of eth did drop, it's still higher than it was a month ago. It was lurking around $8-$9 in late April, and now it's over $12 and slowly rising.