Slashdot Mirror


New Swiss Robot Assists Travelers with Luggage (securitymagazine.com)

A Swiss airport is testing a robot named Leo which can carry a passenger's luggage once they're approaching the terminal. Leo's baggage compartment opens when passengers press his 'Scan & Fly' touch interface, which can also print luggage tags and display a departure time and boarding gate, before delivering their luggage to a baggage handler. The airport's head of IT said the new robot "limits the number of bags in the airport terminal, helping us accommodate a growing number of passengers without compromising the airport experience inside the terminal." And the robot's developer says it proves that robotics "hold the key to more effective, secure and smarter baggage handling and is major step towards further automating bag handling in airports."

40 comments

  1. Tipping the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Leo expect a $10 tip for carrying my bags?

    1. Re:Tipping the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unionized baggage handlers will ensure the robots are taken care of.

    2. Re:Tipping the robot by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      Will Leo expect a $10 tip for carrying my bags?

      Yes, and it has to be in Bitcoin.

    3. Re:Tipping the robot by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Will Leo expect a $10 tip for carrying my bags?

      No, Leo will demand a $50 fee for handling your bag.

      That is all what airlines are about these days . . . charging extra, for stuff that used to be included for free.

      Heard during to safety talk, on a cheapo airline:

      "If you have booked your flight with our extra security package, you will find a seat belt in your seat. Otherwise, if you wish to now have a seat belt during the flight, please contact one of our flight attendants, who can provide you with one for a token fee of $100."

      "In the event that the cabin loses pressure, an oxygen mask will fall down from above. Provided, that you have paid the oxygen fee."

      "When the plane crashes and falls down, burn downs and sinks into the swamp . . . please proceed to the nearest security exit. Note that passengers who have paid the extra escape fee will have preference when exiting the plane."

      "Enjoy your flight!"

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    4. Re:Tipping the robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the American version. And that one will be named LeRoy.

    5. Re:Tipping the robot by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Will Leo expect a $10 tip for carrying my bags?

      No but I bet if you put a bomb in side him he'll goes to pieces so fast people get hit by the shrapnel! (Yes I know I'm paraphrasing Douglas Adams)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

  2. Umm ,,, by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Now you don't even have to carry your bomb ^H^H^H^H^H luggage to the terminal Slip it in Leo and walk away.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    1. Re:Umm ,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now you don't even have to carry your bomb ^H^H^H^H^H luggage to the terminal Slip it in Leo and walk away.

      I had a similar thought but what a great way to have discrete security like bomb sniffing and metal detection. Little droid comes by to "help" while scanning you and your luggage. Cameras in the "eyes" compare your image with terrorists or wanted posters.

      Next, they'll add guns and the robot will give you ten seconds to comply before machine gunning you down like in Roboco II.

    2. Re:Umm ,,, by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      The robot is not configured in a way to enable X-ray scanning of the luggages. Metal detection is useless, these luggages are going into the cargo space and carrying metal in such luggages is not forbidden. You cannot carry a gun, a knife through the passengers' security area. That's not what these robots are intend to.

      Performing facial recognition and identification is a plus at my opinion, it just accelerate the processing no need anymore to go to a counter of the airline company.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    3. Re:Umm ,,, by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

      Setting a bomb off in an area where people are, even if it's "just" the scanning area, is very effective. It means you can't predict where the next attack will be because there's no "this is a target but that isn't" any more.

      The goal is fear and disruption. Any deaths are seen as just a bonus to them.

      --
      "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
    4. Re:Umm ,,, by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Setting a bomb off in an area where people are, even if it's "just" the scanning area, is very effective. It means you can't predict where the next attack will be because there's no "this is a target but that isn't" any more. The goal is fear and disruption. Any deaths are seen as just a bonus to them.

      If you just want to find a crowd, why would you need to go to an airport? You can find those at hundreds of different places. The point is to create a massive overreaction, but then the threat has to be narrow enough that it's feasible like say flying or taking the subway. If they hit a mall, it's just not realistically possible to create a "Mall Security Agency" based on the TSA with security checkpoints. People won't stop going to malls and if they start rationalizing it like there's 300 dead in a population of 300 million, that's "struck by lightning" odds then the terror effect doesn't take hold.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Umm ,,, by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Well, you could reconfigure the robot...

      Passengers' checked-bags are X-rayed and scanned for anything "suspicious." This is why you can no longer lock your bags. The TSA has left an occasional note in my bag saying that they opened it to check out something.

      It's an interesting idea to have the helpful robot meet you at curbside to take your bags, scan them, and perhaps deliver them to the appropriate place (e.g., "safe", "suspicious").

    6. Re:Umm ,,, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just want to find a crowd, why would you need to go to an airport?.

      Apparently you haven't got an airport badge, for this is standard fare for the security exams. It is because there are a lot of different nationalities at an airport, which means you get more attention in more countries. Media reactions are quite predictable.

    7. Re:Umm ,,, by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Last time I got one of those notes, they stole my flashlight...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  3. That will never work in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The robots don't take to kindly, of the TSA fondling them.

  4. congestion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The main advantage in the article sounds like it is to ease congestion in the airport. When I picture each large bag (or two bags) replaced by a larger robot, I can only imagine congestion getting worse. Plus, the robots appear in the video to move slower than a typical traveler.

    It sure would be nice to include a link to an article with a picture of the robot, at least.

    1. Re:congestion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It saves you the standing in the check-in line. Instead you can have fun chasing robots.

  5. Thank God! by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perish the thought that we could not have the full "airport experience". I'm so glad that carrying my bags doesn't distract me anymore from being fondled and molested and standing in queue for 3+ hours, an "experience" like no others.

    I'm SO grateful that someone finally took care of the REAL problems we have at airports!

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Thank God! by no-body · · Score: 1

      Perish the thought that we could not have the full "airport experience". I'm so glad that carrying my bags doesn't distract me anymore from being fondled and molested and standing in queue for 3+ hours, an "experience" like no others.

      I'm SO grateful that someone finally took care of the REAL problems we have at airports!

      Needs more work...

      If you watched the video: https://www.sita.aero/innovati...
      and imagine hundreds or thousands of those boxes "avoiding" = standing still when people are in front, how those boxes are progressing in an airport?environment.

      Security is definitely an issue - never leave your suitcase alone out of your control - hack this robot and fill it up....

      Avoiding lines is tempting, probably there will be a price tag on this service, yet another human class distinction...

    2. Re: Thank God! by comrade1 · · Score: 1

      This is a Swiss airport, not in the u.s. The only place you get molested is the USA. Someone at this airport has a thing for robots. A few years ago there was another robot that would answer people's public transportation questions in the luggage pick-up area.

  6. Compromising the airport experience??? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    The airport's head of IT said the new robot "limits the number of bags in the airport terminal, helping us accommodate a growing number of passengers without compromising the airport experience inside the terminal

    What the fuck is there to compromise in the airport experience?

    Let's summarize shall we:

    - Arrive at the airport. Park at the super-uber-overpriced airport parking lot - or pay the super-uber-overpriced cab driver.

    - Enter the terminal. From here on, you can't smoke or vape - so sneak a quick one before entering.

    - Find your friggin' check-in desk. Despite arriving 3h early, there's a million tourists with too many luggages and no mastery of english whatsoever already waiting in line.

    - It's your turn: lift the fucking luggage onto the scale - pay an extra $100 because it's 2 grams overweight.

    - Get entered into the airline database. Get issued a stupid e-ticket printed on 40g thermal toilet paper. Pray you don't lose it.

    - Rush to the security area. There, the million tourists who were waiting in line to check in are now waiting in line to get groped by TSA perverts, like cattle at the slaughterhouse.

    - It's finally your turn. You almost want to be groped at this point, to be done with it and go get a coffee.

    - Find a coffee shop. Pay $15 for something black and watery the shop calls coffee.

    - Find your gate. Sit at your gate with the million tourists who think it's the holiday of a lifetime.

    - Realize the gate has changed, you didn't notice and your flight departs in 3 minutes 50 gates away.

    - Rush like a madman. Find the gate closed. Miss your flight.

    What is there to redeem in the airport experience? Really? The only people who have a nice airport experience are those who fly private jets, because they don't go through the fucking airport in the first place.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Compromising the airport experience??? by AchilleTalon · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should have read TFA. Just a though.

      --
      Achille Talon
      Hop!
    2. Re: Compromising the airport experience??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, I fly a private jet ... Except it's not a jet, was built In the 70's and flies at 90 knots cost about $20,000 and another $6000 for a pilots license. Though the FAA is trying its best to fix that, you don't have to be a millionaire to fly yourself.

    3. Re:Compromising the airport experience??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I get the impression the "airport experience" is better without you being there?

    4. Re:Compromising the airport experience??? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      This robot allows you to skip waiting in line to check in your luggage. So if you have a pre-printed boarding pass, you can go straight to your gate, saving time and skipping many of the inconveniences on your list. So what are you complaining about?

    5. Re:Compromising the airport experience??? by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      What the fuck is there to compromise in the airport experience?

      Let's summarize shall we:

      - Arrive at the airport. Park at the super-uber-overpriced airport parking lot - or pay the super-uber-overpriced cab driver.

      It's Switzerland. Super-uber-overpriced is the norm in the entire country.

      - Enter the terminal. From here on, you can't smoke or vape - so sneak a quick one before entering.

      GVA has smoking lounges for the terminally addicted behind security. Before security you can just slip out the terminal for 5 minutes.

      - Find your friggin' check-in desk. Despite arriving 3h early, there's a million tourists with too many luggages and no mastery of english whatsoever already waiting in line.

      That may be a bit of a problem, especially in the winter season. But at least then it's Brits that congest the place, and they do speak English!

      - It's your turn: lift the fucking luggage onto the scale - pay an extra $100 because it's 2 grams overweight.

      Only when you are flying Swiss

      - Get entered into the airline database. Get issued a stupid e-ticket printed on 40g thermal toilet paper. Pray you don't lose it.

      Evere heard of e-ticketing, on your phone? If you insist un getting a printed boarding pass, you might as well travel by horse and carriage.

      - Rush to the security area. There, the million tourists who were waiting in line to check in are now waiting in line to get groped by TSA perverts, like cattle at the slaughterhouse.

      - It's finally your turn. You almost want to be groped at this point, to be done with it and go get a coffee.

      Really, GVA has one of the best security checks that I know off. Speedy (15 min. queue max.) and friendly, but there could be a bit more place to re-pack your things.

      - Find a coffee shop. Pay $15 for something black and watery the shop calls coffee.

      It's no the US. This would be European coffee, which is actually stronger than tea.

      - Find your gate. Sit at your gate with the million tourists who think it's the holiday of a lifetime.

      - Realize the gate has changed, you didn't notice and your flight departs in 3 minutes 50 gates away.

      How many gates do you think GVA has?

      - Rush like a madman. Find the gate closed. Miss your flight.

      What is there to redeem in the airport experience? Really? The only people who have a nice airport experience are those who fly private jets, because they don't go through the fucking airport in the first place.

      That's another plus of GVA: the private jets! Lots of small business thingies, plus the occasional 747. Because when you want to check your bank account, you want to do so in style.

  7. It's just a marketing gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go check the video on youtube. It just so nothing more than carry bag to the belt and someone had to pick up and drop. So it does not add real value, looks more of something to show off when whole world is on to autonomous driving. Hey me too, with no purpose or value!!!

    1. Re:It's just a marketing gimmick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...whole world is on to autonomous driving

      Overstate much?

  8. Minimal benefit when located on the sidewalk by Josiah+C. · · Score: 1

    You can already do exactly the same thing by walking 50 meters farther. You scan your boarding pass; it prints your luggage tags and a receipt; you attach them and put your luggage on the conveyor belt. So all the robot really does is to save you 50 meters of schlepping your luggage. Of course, you do not have to wait on line for the robot, as it is experimental and people do not line up to use it. But if the robot were to become popular, then you would have to wait to use one, just as you have to wait to use the self-service luggage registering. The minimal added value of the robot would be greater if it could take your luggage while you are in the bus or on the train ON THE WAY TO THE AIRPORT! I note that the trains already cooperate for baggage checking in advance, so this should not be an issue with them. What about the bus or tram? Can the TPG also cooperate with the airport?

  9. Switzerland rejected UBI 78% against by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Cue the /. comments how this development requires UBI to 'take care' of the poor language handlers in Geneva. Of-course Switzerland just voted down an attempt at UBI in a democratic referendum, 78% against the UBI.

    I discuss why UBI is the wrong idea in a few posts and there is an obvious backlash from the usual suspects here.

    1. Re:Switzerland rejected UBI 78% against by Incadenza · · Score: 1

      Cue the /. comments how this development requires UBI to 'take care' of the poor language handlers in Geneva. Of-course Switzerland just voted down an attempt at UBI in a democratic referendum, 78% against the UBI.

      I discuss why UBI is the wrong idea in a few posts and there is an obvious backlash from the usual suspects here.

      The baggage handlers would probably be living in France anyway.

    2. Re:Switzerland rejected UBI 78% against by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... from business and labour regulation ...

      I'm guessing your espousing the libertine ideal of using your bargaining power and the legal system to get a fair deal.

      Let me ponder that: You buy some new tyres, without knowing the manufacturer used cheaper steel, because lack of business regulation means he doesn't have to tell you the time of day. On a drive to town, the tyres shred and you slide into oncoming truck. Congratulations, you're dead, you can't sue anyone. Do you have life insurance so your family is provided for? Wait, the insurance company doesn't pay-out for 90 days, if you want it faster, you have to sue. Does your spouse have enough money to pay for 90 days of expenses, or to pay a lawyer? Don't worry, the lawyer will waive upfront fees, for a size-able chunk of your estate since there are no regulations against it. If your family doesn't like that, they can always sue.

      ... getting rid of income and wealth taxes ...

      So there'll be no-one to buy bridges, schools and police patrols. The government is a single buyer for these and in most countries, also communications backbone and hospitals. That has two consequences: 1) The government can share those assets with citizens who can't afford to pay, 2) it reduces market forces on consumption.

      Point (2) takes explaining. The market is usually described in terms of supply and demand. But a corporation isn't designed to increase supply, it's designed to increase profits. That makes corporate goals to be increasing prices and eliminating competition, with increasing supply a distant third goal. The way to increase prices is via increased demand, or via decreased supply: It's obvious which one a corporation will choose and there are plenty of examples of just that. By dealing with one buyer, corporations have less power to increase prices.

      ... can save and start and run their own businesses.

      Yes, every woman can stand on a street corner and become a breadwinner. Or more likely, the daughter will be the breadwinner, since the old model, the mother, is less valuable. Or do you mean we all buy our uniforms, our tools, our training, our holiday pay, our pension plans and in return, we tell our 'employers' what days and what hours and for what salary package we will go to work?

      Combined with a 'no taxes' philosophy, it means you're one of the 'everybody gets a job' crowd. Both Reagan and Bush proved throwing money at rich people, through tax cuts, doesn't create more businesses. Just as throwing money at poor people doesn't increase the standard of living. But welfare isn't really there to make life better, it stops life sinking below some minimum, which is why most people will have a job under a universal income scheme. The argument everyone will stop work is ridiculous.

      A sale between a producer and a non producer is a loss

      A sale is an exchange of value. The exchange usually occurs because both parties think they're getting a tolerable or good amount of value for what is being handed-over.

      I assume the non-producers are the unemployed, the incarcerated, and children. If 'producing' is equal to 'getting paid', then mothers and volunteer associations aren't producing anything either. If you and corporations don't want money from those people, you don't have to take it. I suspect you're arguing against welfare hand-outs because poor people aren't producing anything. Poor people can produce things if you want: half-eaten pies in the supermarket, traffic hazards on a road, bricks tied to an axe handle, smashed windows, burning cars, even infectious diseases. What, you don't want to buy those things? Doesn't matter; life is sticky and doesn't vanish because it's not running a business. Someone sitting on his arse, watching television all day, will be the exception and will cost much less than the alternative.

  10. So it's ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... delivering their luggage to a baggage handler.

    So it's really, a self-driving trolley that brings a self-check-in terminal to you. Corporations want to export the US travel pork-barreling, sorry experience. Which is standing in line for a mandated 3 hours, getting groped, getting an e-tablet stolen by a crooked TSA employee, and avoiding any activity which may be called 'suspicious' and result in being kicked off the plane. This robot doesn't enable any of that so it's not useful.

  11. Assistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [in robot voice] "Allow me to assist you with your luggage. Please place your luggage in the compartment and close the door." [substantial shredding noise] "You may pick up your luggage at your final destination. Here is your receipt. Please be sure to log on and take our satisfaction survey."

  12. Swiss Army Robot? by jandersen · · Score: 1

    It runs on clockwork, of course, and comes with hundreds of little, useful tools, such as knife blades, saws etc, all made to the highest standards.

  13. The Luggage by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    Too bad Sir Terry Pratchett is no longer with us to see The Luggage for real. It's already somewhat sapient, but does it come with a pearwood finish?

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
  14. Oh. My. God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you've ever been to Geneva and tried to catch the next Lufthanza (oh, sorry, Swissair) flight to Frankfurt, you get to join the maelstrom of passengers fighting to drop off your luggage (and probably check in, too). So this sounds like a good idea at first, but Geneva is a ridiculously small airport and notion of a few hundred bagbots stumbling through an already seething throng of frustrated passengers can only lead to disaster. Has anyone done an operational analysis of this? Perhaps hiring more counter staff and a more reliable check-in process would help. Sheesh.

  15. "Too Many Luggages" by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1
    >>too many luggages and no mastery of english whatsoever already waiting in line.

    Thank you for that.