Slashdot Mirror
Air Force Has Lost 100,000 Inspector General Records (thehill.com)
schwit1 shares an article from The Hill: The Air Force announced on Friday that it has lost thousands of records belonging to the service's inspector general due to a database crash. "We estimate we've lost information for 100,000 cases dating back to 2004," Air Force spokeswoman Ann Stefanek told The Hill in an email. "The database crashed and there is no data..." The database, called the Automated Case Tracking System (ACTS), holds all records related to IG complaints, investigations, appeals and Freedom of Information Act requests.... "We also use ACTS to track congressional/constituent inquiries."
The Air Force said they were "aggressively" trying to recover the data, adding that they had no evidence of malicious intent.
The Air Force said they were "aggressively" trying to recover the data, adding that they had no evidence of malicious intent.
You... do... have a backup, ... right?
E
This sounds very fortunate (and convenient) to the powers that be.!
It was probably just some healthy food recipes that were lost anyway.
As a matter of marginal relevance, is the the US Air Force, the (British) Royal Air Force, or some other bunch of random clowns with an aeroplane somewhere?
Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
I wonder where they'll store the request?
Mimetics Inc. Twitter
That database had it coming.
Given that what our government agencies do usually costs 2-10x what a private corporation would cost, I guess it was too much to expect a database backup for all of those extra inefficiency dollars, huh?
Or were they using an IRS server?
Never attribute to happenstance which can be attributed to a cover up.
So they're done asking nicely?
No need for that fancy stuff since it wasn't mission critical data
Must have been designed by Carnegie Mellon grads
James Hacker: Was 1967 a particularly bad winter?
Sir Humphrey Appleby: No, a marvellous winter. We lost no end of embarrassing files.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
What is aggresive recovery? Waterboarding the hard disks or straight to rubber hoses?
Let's mention the first 3 laws of computing:
1 - Backup
2 - BACKUP
3 - See Rules 1 & 2
On top of that, when I was in the USAF working in the missile shop, we had FIVE copies of all the records, and they were stored in different places. Losing the records to a missile would mean your ASS! More than one would crucify the entire shop!
And now someone is trying to complain that the Inspector General has lost a huge amount of records because of a single database crash?
Is someone incompetent running the Inspector Generals Office?
Do they freaking need some of us old time computer geek veterans to come over there and show them how NOT to be a total embarrassment?!
If what you did had the results you where going for it is not called "malicious intent". Oh, you mean in general, yeah, well, awkward.
Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
You send the MPs in with automatic weapons and pull that disk under gunpoint. It goes straight to On-Track by defense courier, do not pass Go, do not collect $200.
Your first guess was correct.
Clowns don't make these funny mistakes by accident, making you laugh is intentional.
I don't know about that; Obama has been pretty open about wiping his ass with the Constitution.
Contrast Hilary Clinton, who has been involved in government since 1977 and her primary responsibility for 38 years has been cover ups and white-washing.
Trump is another who is pretty open about doing and saying things that people don't like.
You hit the nail on the head. I've probably encountered more broken backups than ones that work. Web hosting providers frequently provide backups that stopped working 10 months ago, but nobody noticed. If you haven't recently tested restoring your backups, you probably have no backups.
I like to use remote backups that I can restore from conveniently, so that I restore a file from time to time just because I messed up a couple paragraphs of text or something. These real-life, low-impact restores serve to verify backup and restore is working properly.
Sound like the Air Force may have added Booby Tables to the Inspector Generals Records.
https://xkcd.com/327/
"Grab them by the pussy" -- President of the United States of America
We'll see ... but I'm willing to bet that there won't be ANY higher officers fired for this. Even though it means that some IG investigations/reports are now lost. Unless that is a feature that they wanted.
Money quote. Corruption is the feature, oversight/inspections are the bugs. Now you're thinking like upper brass and/or contractors.
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
A friend works on that system and says it works best with MSIE 5.5, but 6 also works. I've got the user manual in front of me, and it looks like the screenshots are all from MSIE 5.5. Also, the site only support SSL 128-bit so you can't use newer browsers anyway. The site is written in ColdFusion, and when you edit a record, it deletes the record then recreates it when you hit save. He said deleting the record was done to prevent concurrent updates. If you forget to hit save or if MSIE or Windows crashes, then the record is lost.
...that which can be adequately explained by malice.
Everyone and their mother knows how to do backups. The US military - contrary to popular belief - is fairly well organised and does not employ idiots.
If all records and all backups of records are corrupted, it's because someone wanted it to be so. A contractor will be paid a huge amount of money to take the blame, and another contractor will take the mantle. Like WWE, only people take it seriously.
From the article:
The Air Force said it was notified on June 6 by a contractor that administers the database of records that the data within was "corrupted," according to a statement.
How many contractors administered the database? I wonder if that was part of the problem: "Oh, I thought you guys were going to back up the database ... No you were supposed to back it up."
If just one contractor was clearly responsible for the backup, then I wish the government would:
1) Fire the contractor, and never use them again.
2) Publicly announce the name of the contractor, so that we know not to use them.
(Of course a lot more needs to be done, such as making sure this doesn't happen again in any govt. dept.)
Trump is another who is pretty open about doing and saying things that people don't like.
Trump is a grade-A bullshit artist.
He'll piss on you, and then charge you for the shower.
Delete on purpose to hide IG findings or are Hillary's server guys moonlighting?
So you lost all your data and didn't have a backup? It's happened to all of us and somehow, life goes on.
At least you didn't spend the past 10 years implementing, maintaining, and testing a foolproof backup system, because that sounds like a real drag.
Take a look at this: http://www.thenation.com/article/the-national-security-expose-so-secret-even-edward-snowden-didnt-know-about-it/ where a former assistant Inspector General for the Pentagon claims whistleblowers were treated illegally. Neither the parent article nor that linked one inspire confidence in any DoD related Inspector General office.
And it would be really really nice if we ever had a congressional investigation into why we invaded the wrong country. You know, Iraq. Have you forgotten that? No involvement in the 9/11 attacks, no weapons of mass destruction (except the left over ones from when Regan and Cheney were best buds with Saddam Husein).
There has never been a official accounting for why the US invaded Iraq. There lots of hearings about "faulty intelligence", which were grand political theater to lay blame on the CIA, FBI, NSA, FCC, FAA, NBC, CNN, CBS, ASPCA, FFA (Future Farmers of America), Girl Scouts, etc. But the decision was made in the White House, not by intelligence agencies or the Congress or the judiciary.
There was the Iraq Study Group, which was just about as useful as it sounds. It was not done by a government entity, it was just funded by Congress. It had no subpoena power, so no one could be compelled to testify, and nobody with any direct involvement showed up. Not a surprise. It was designed to produce no useful result, and it succeeded brilliantly.
The one other official investigation was about Chaney leaking Valery Plame's covert position at the CIA, which lead to the conviction of Scooter Libby for obstruction of justice. Libby took a bullet for Chaney, and then got his sentence committed by Bush. You want to see how a real successful government coverup works, that's how it's done. Democrats aren't anywhere in that leage, but then the Republicans get so much more practice.
Why is Snark Required?
I remember when I said stuff like that. You're pissed that parties are partisan. So cute. At this stage, you're still rooting for the team you picked, thinking that they aren't just as corrupt, playing you like a piano. Clinton has your name on a list of people like you. At this stage, you don't quite know the politicians' names (Chaney and Regan lol), but you're sure that the politicians on the other team are evil, while the politicians on the team you chose are good. You don't know the names of the Congressional commitees or agencies, or treaties, but you can almost get them half right as you parrot the propaganda you heard on last night's comedy show.
Later, you'll learn the names and start to understand a little bit about what they do. You'll be able to parrot the party propaganda and actually get it right. Hillary will move your name to another list.
Assuming you have an IQ above 87, after that you'll eventually realize what you've been regurgitating is silly propaganda, that Clinton's job since 1977 has been to figure out which lies stage 1 and stage 2 people will fall for.
Probably everything is fine. Anybody know any spies they can find out from?
of their own malicious intent. And who's gonna prove you did it, and take you to court? No one.
Clearly you are very well educated and experienced in legal matters.
This is criminal negligence at best. But obviously it's a conspiracy of willful obstruction of justice.
How they hell can there not be emergency offsite backups?
I guess the US Air Force would like us to believe that they have some keystone network server at the bottom of a ventilation shaft somewhere that will completely destroy the US military should it ever be attacked, because "Redundancy? ".
If the records are lost, then the Air Force benefits. Cases are closed, investigations are upended, liability ceases.
This happens every so often. I have a friend that was chemically burned by Agent Orange. The Army claimed that his records were destroyed in a fire and denied him 100% disability status for almost 50 years. The story changed when he became good friends with a retired general. A few pulled strings later and voila, documentation of his injuries suddenly appeared.
..including Richard Nixon
The American public (aided greatly by press core that was hostile to that President) supported removing Nixon from office after hearing that 18 minutes of audio tape that were not even official public records were "missing" and hearing the weak explanation of Rose Mary Woods. Nixon's support was further weakened when he asserted that "executive privilege" meant he did not have to hand over things like his personal audio tapes to congress. Nixon certainly did wrong, and I was and remain OK with his removal, but I want the rules applied equally to both parties. Any politician who deletes records which are being sought by the courts, or sought by citizens with valid FOIA filings, or sought by the national archives should be prosecuted, jailed, and banned from ever holding office again - no matter WHAT party they belong to.
President Obama, has eliminated the equivalent of railroad cars full of actual documents from numerous agencies including the VA, State, DoD, EPA, DoE, etc and asserted a huge number of "executive privilege" claims over things like his "Fast & Furious" gun running and Benghazi embassy debacles, both of which involved actual loss-of-life. Obama has a press however who mostly voted for him and support his goals (90%+ admit it in polls) and therefore either do not report this stuff or put it in the best light possible and in places with minimal audience attention. On Obama's watch, a large number of USAF purchasing scandals have occurred. The scandals themselves are probably the fault of the bureaucracy the contractors etc rather than Obama personally, but suppressing the scandals is probably in his personal political interests as will as the interests of those more-directly involved. As CEO of the federal govt, it's Obama's job to get off the golf course and make clear to his cabinet people that this sort of loss in unacceptable BEFORE IT HAPPENS. It's not as though nobody has come up with a way to back-up computer data....
Oh, and Hillary is hardly a novice at this. When she was in the White House, she hid documents which were under subpoena and were from her old company, the Rose Law firm, in the private residence of the White House until the statute of limitations expired. The draft indictments against her from that time are still under seal and the subject of ongoing lawsuits. After 9-11, Clinton consigliere Sandy Burger was caught in the national archives stuffing Clinton admin docs into his socks and underwear to spirit them out, thereby erasing the nation's ability to ever see them. There's no telling how many documents he managed to remove and destroy before being caught, but there's something probably related to Bin Laden that the Clintonistas never want the American people to know. Her 30K deleted e-mails (she claims were about yoga and wedding dresses) are hardly her first foray into the wonton destruction of documents.
come on. you want us believe you aren't backing all this up?
figures