Slashdot Mirror


PC Shipments Return To Growth In the US (theverge.com)

PC shipments are seeing a welcome growth in the United States. The industry, which has seen a continual decline in the sales in the past few consecutive quarters, is now seemingly gaining some momentum in the United States, according to independent findings by marketing research firms IDC and Gartner. According to IDC, the PC shipments have increased by 4.9%, whereas Gartner says it has observed a 1.4% growth. From a report on The Verge: The estimates differ because Gartner does not count Chromebooks as part of its figures, while IDC cites Google's laptops as a key reason for US growth. [...] Worldwide, PC shipments are still on a decline. Gartner estimates a 5.2 percent drop, and IDC calculates around a 4.5 percent decrease in shipments. Microsoft's free Windows 10 upgrade comes to an end on July 29th, and IDC believes it may prompt some PC users into buying new machines. Gartner also forecasts a Windows 10 hardware refresh for businesses, that it expects to see "more toward the end of 2016 to the beginning of 2017."

75 comments

  1. Slow growth? by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing a batch of cheap capacitors can't fix..

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    1. Re:Slow growth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...um, what?

    2. Re:Slow growth? by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      He refers to a certain period of manufacturing where lower quality capacitors were used, which resulted in failing computers within 3 to 5 years. If I remember correctly, that was around the P-IV / Athlon days. So, if manufacturers start using worse caps, the computers will die quicker and as such people will be forced to buy replacement machines earlier.

      See also: planned obsolescence.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    3. Re:Slow growth? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Lower quality = counterfeit. To be clear they still use the lowest quality, nothing's changed there.

      Planned obsolesce doesn't work when you're forced to replace defective products.

  2. Obviously by franzrogar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When people started to realize that mobiles, iCraps, Nezus 9, PDAs and other monstruosities ain't built for real work (but publicity and companies catalogs), real computers are being sold again.

    1. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There also seems to be a market segment that wants to build their own gaming PC's but then finds out that they have big, dumb sausage fingers.

    2. Re:Obviously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understood that reference.

  3. What does Windows 10 got to do with it? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I finally replaced the nine-year-old system I built for Windows Vista. Went from a quad-core processor, AMD 690 motherboard and 4GB DDR2 800MHz RAM, to AMD eight-core processor, AMD 760 motherboard and 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM. Windows 10 had no problem adjusting to the new hardware. I'll probably keep this system for another nine years before I upgrade again.

    1. Re:What does Windows 10 got to do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I finally replaced the nine-year-old system I built for Windows Vista. Went from a quad-core processor, AMD 690 motherboard and 4GB DDR2 800MHz RAM, to AMD eight-core processor, AMD 760 motherboard and 8GB DDR3 1600MHz RAM. Windows 10 had no problem adjusting to the new hardware. I'll probably keep this system for another nine years before I upgrade again.

      Key words here; I built.

      Usually a consumer saavy enough to piecemeal together a decent desktop does not skimp out on mass-produced options to shave another 73 cents off the unit cost.

      Also, I'm guessing you didn't bother to bog down your new rig with the pre-installed bundle of performance-robbing crapware that burdens the average consumer PC.

  4. Computing plateau by jawtheshark · · Score: 2
    Really, it's just that: we're at a computing plateau. At least for most users. Twenty years ago, if you held onto your machine for 5 years, the machine was usually unusable with up to date software. These days? 5 years? No problem. I'm still using a i7-2630QM, which was introduced in 01/2011. There is absolutely nothing wrong with it and does anything I ask of it.

    Same for my desktop, an AMD A8-3860, which was introduced in 07/2011. Does what I need, quickly enough.

    Are these machines high end machines now? Absolutely not... However, the time of buying new toys just to have new toys, is over for me. Works for me, means: no reason to upgrade. Many people who are not into tech think that way. A few years ago, I helped a non-tech with her old desktop. It had died: caps gone up in smoke. I said: hey, it's about 5 years old, it had a good run. She: *only* five years? Non-tech people think differently (Ha!) These days I'd be pissed too if my machine died after 5 years of use.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:Computing plateau by hodet · · Score: 1

      I'm on year 7 with my Dell Vostro 1520 currently running xubuntu 14.04. Does most of what I need, even plays Minecraft 1.10.2 relatively well. I never thought this laptop would last so long, I remember thinking it felt a little flimsy when I got it. But it has stood the test of time and will probably continue for a few more years.

  5. It makes sense by halivar · · Score: 2

    Consoles used to be the budget alternative to PC gaming. Nowadays, the cost/performance ratio is not in console's favor. And consoles are only getting more expensive, while current and last gen PC prices remain pretty steady.

    1. Re:It makes sense by tepples · · Score: 2

      That and more people have discovered that they're willing to settle for relatively simple point-and-click games not dependent on reflexes. These run well on tablets, phones, or otherwise outdated PCs.

    2. Re:It makes sense by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      These run well on tablets, phones, or otherwise outdated PCs.

      Are you implying that the latest AAA shooter targeted at consoles does not run well on an outdated PC?

  6. Chromebooks don't count? by zerofoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does Gartner only consider a computer running windows a PC?

    Our company is increasingly getting work done in the cloud. A web browser is all most of our employees really need. The nature of office work is changing - and is increasingly less-reliant on windows to get that work done.

    1. Re:Chromebooks don't count? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I don't see where Gartner was only considering machines running Windows as "PCs". The computer world has a whole lot more to it than just Windows-based machines and Chromebooks.

    2. Re:Chromebooks don't count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. They are considered Netbooks or sometimes Ultraportables. Everyone considers it a type of laptop.

    3. Re:Chromebooks don't count? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Does it count computer parts? Perhaps people who build their own are such an insignificant %, but I really wonder what they use to count it. Perhaps Windows activations?

    4. Re:Chromebooks don't count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our company is increasingly getting work done in the cloud.

      Uh oh... ever considered looking for new opportunities?

  7. Should Chromebooks count? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    On the one hand, Chromebooks are computers that require manufacturing, so perhaps they should. On the other hand, Chromebooks are not really "PCs" as the term is usually used and occupy an entirely different market segment.

    1. Re:Should Chromebooks count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they are considered Netbooks or sometimes Ultraportables. Everyone considers it a type of laptop.

    2. Re:Should Chromebooks count? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Well, not everyone. I know a substantial number of people that don't. They consider them a category of their own.

  8. Smaller market, too. by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just as importantly, the market has shifted. There is still a stable market for computing and it will continue to exist, but it no longer includes the home/casual user segment. Those people have gone over to tablets and phones (most all of the non-tech folks that I know now have an older laptop sitting dusty on their top closet shelf, unused for years, and don't plan to replace it; only about half have even bothered to get a bluetooth keyboard for their tablet, while the rest are perfectly satisfied with the onscreen keyboard).

    Business, tech-oriented people, the self-employed, creatives, and so on will continue to buy full-fledged computing hardware and to upgrade it over time, but this is a much smaller market than once existed for computing, where the market included basically every home and individual in developed societies. So some correction in sales was (and probably remains) inevitable over time.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Smaller market, too. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      Good point. My mother in law never uses her computer any more. Totally shifted everything to her phone. I can't imagine to reply to even an email on my phone except for very short replies, but it works for her. So, one less computer sale. Her current computer stands in the corner gathering dust.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    2. Re:Smaller market, too. by tepples · · Score: 1

      Business, tech-oriented people, the self-employed, creatives, and so on will continue to buy full-fledged computing hardware and to upgrade it over time

      Unless the sticker shock of having to upgrade from a tablet to "full-fledged computing hardware" is discouraging people from becoming "tech-oriented", "self-employed", or "creatives" in the first place. Consider the example of a high school student given programming homework. Is such a student expected to sell his tablet and buy a laptop, as exomondo recommended?

    3. Re:Smaller market, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Business, tech-oriented people, the self-employed, creatives, and so on will continue to buy full-fledged computing hardware and to upgrade it over time,

      You bet it, bro. I still have 2007 desktop systems running Linux like a charm, still kicking the asses of many a shiny iCraps and laptops [which are not real computers for me]. I plan to upgrade them some time into the 2020's.

    4. Re:Smaller market, too. by tepples · · Score: 1

      I still have 2007 desktop systems running Linux like a charm, still kicking the asses of many a shiny iCraps and laptops [which are not real computers for me].

      So you think Macs are not "real computers", eh?

      That's not the impression I got. I took "iCrap" as referring to devices running iOS (iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad), not your iMac.

      Oh, and OS X/macOS is a Certified UNIX. Linux is just a UNIX wanna-be.

      Unifix Linux was the first Linux distribution to be certified, back in the Linux 2.0 days. iOS wasn't certified to anything.

    5. Re:Smaller market, too. by anarcobra · · Score: 1

      > student given programming homework
      Do it on the computers your school has available for that shit.
      If they don't provide any, don't do the homework.
      Even universities provide computers for everyone to do their lab work on.
      In high school it would be ridiculous to just expect every family to buy a computer just for homework.

    6. Re:Smaller market, too. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      A lot of classes now want or prefer typed assignments... so my son has an inexpensive laptop to use. That being said it is 4 or so years old and works fine for what he needs it for.

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    7. Re:Smaller market, too. by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1

      Unifix Linux was the first Linux distribution to be certified, back in the Linux 2.0 days.

      "Certified" as in "passed the Open Group test suite and was thus certified as being able to be described as a Unix system"? ("The vendor claims it's POSIX-compliant" doesn't count as "certified".)

    8. Re:Smaller market, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think Macs are not "real computers", eh?

      That's not what he said, dumbass.

      Oh, and OS X/macOS is a Certified UNIX. Linux is just a UNIX wanna-be.

      I'd rather have a Linux "certified" computer than Unix "certified". The world has moved on, gramps.

    9. Re:Smaller market, too. by macs4all · · Score: 0

      I'd rather have a Linux "certified" computer than Unix "certified". The world has moved on, gramps.

      And I'm sure you speak for all, Coward.

    10. Re:Smaller market, too. by largesnike · · Score: 2

      It would seem that the PC market contained passive users (people who browse, view, send) as well as active users (people who create content including programming). Over the last few years smart phones and tablets have been taking all of the passive users away, so the market has shrunk in size. I think that process is now pretty much complete, so we're now seeing the gradual increase in active users in line with a gradually increasing population.

      --
      "Laugh while you can a-monkey boy!" - Dr Emilio Lizardo
    11. Re:Smaller market, too. by tepples · · Score: 1

      It would seem that the PC market contained passive users (people who browse, view, send) as well as active users (people who create content including programming). Over the last few years smart phones and tablets have been taking all of the passive users away

      And suddenly, cost becomes a barrier for a user seeking to transition from passive to active.

    12. Re:Smaller market, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And suddenly, cost becomes a barrier for a user seeking to transition from passive to active.

      With so much perfectly usable second-hand hardware in circulation I seriously doubt it.

    13. Re:Smaller market, too. by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of what they are doing with Win10 including "Windows as a service" is to reduce dependence on PC sales for Windows revenue. WinSE is expensive for example. I recommend that you read this: https://hal2020.com/2013/03/07...

  9. Cap plague by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    The implication is that people are having to replace PCs due to capacitor plague. Between 1999 and 2003, some Taiwanese electronics manufacturers shipped electrolytic capacitors based on a faulty formula misappropriated from Rubycon, which caused the capacitors to fail much earlier than intended. By 2007, most affected devices should have already failed.

  10. Windows 10 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Gartner also forecasts a Windows 10 hardware refresh for businesses, that it expects to see "more toward the end of 2016 to the beginning of 2017."

    My business is moving off Windows altogether. We currently have about 50 Windows 7 machines and are currently moving all our databases over from Access to POSTGRES (hey they're old and they've been working fine for about 15 years) We're also converting all our office documents over to Open Office and are converting our web apps to run under Apache. Once complete we'll be keeping the same machines we bought 3 years ago and will be running Linux Mint (decent CPU 8Gb RAM).

    There'll be one heavily locked down Windows 7 box retained in case we need to convert anything coming in from customers but a) we're not planning on being spied on by Windows 10 and b) The machines we have actually run faster when converted to Linux mint as opposed to Windows 7.

    So no PC or software sales from our business next year. And no more money for Microsoft. We don't like people trying to spy on us.

  11. They do if you pay employees' cell bills by tepples · · Score: 1

    Our company is increasingly getting work done in the cloud.

    That's great provided you're willing to pay your employees' cellular data bills so that they can VNC or RDP into your application server while away from a desk. Otherwise, your users will have to stick to Chrome apps specifically designed for offline use. If you have programmers, for example, Google's in-browser NaCl IDE is no perfect substitute for Linux- or Windows-based IDEs. Google warns: "to develop a substantial application for Native Client / Portable Native Client, we recommend you use the Native Client SDK" which is designed for Windows, macOS, and X11/Linux.

    1. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That's great provided you're willing to pay your employees' cellular data bills so that they can VNC or RDP into your application server while away from a desk.

      Have you heard of WiFi? Not to mention that any large company will typically even in a full PC architecture have files stored away on a remote server somewhere with clients endlessly accessing through via VPN.

      Seriously this is a non-issue.

    2. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With WiFi and decent security for it, one need not use cellphones...and Chromebooks now do offline stuff, have for at least a year...and many Chromebooks will be getting most/all Android apps soon.

    3. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by tepples · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of WiFi?

      Have you heard of cities whose public transit doesn't provide Wi-Fi?

      Not to mention that any large company will typically even in a full PC architecture have files stored away on a remote server somewhere with clients endlessly accessing through via VPN.

      Check out file while online, work on file while offline, check in file while online.

    4. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you heard of cities whose public transit doesn't provide Wi-Fi?

      nope, they all faded away

    5. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 3rd world country doesn't provide WiFi on its craptastic public transport system (save for a few select subway stations) but it doesn't matter because smartphones are inexpensive & ubiquitous since no contracts/plans are required to get (cheap) mobile data. Even if you never buy any data you get free access to the social networks du jour with each top-up charge - WhatsApp & Facebook Messenger usage among all age groups is insanely high because of this.

    6. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by tepples · · Score: 1

      Our company is increasingly getting work done in the cloud.

      That's great provided you're willing to pay your employees' cellular data bills [for access from] public transit

      Even if you never buy any data you get free access to the social networks du jour with each top-up charge

      But not your company's VPN or other resources "in the cloud", which was the point. Even if Facebook and Wikipedia are part of the "Free Basics" zero-rating plan, your company's resources aren't. Except for your company's social media marketing department, your company doesn't want employees accessing Facebook while on the clock. Thus your company will still have to either A. buy data or B. use tools with a checkout/checkin paradigm in order for employees in transit to get work done. And if you have employees who travel often, in-flight data was so expensive last I checked that checkout/checkin based tools are essential.

    7. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My point was that smartphones & mobile data are so cheap that it's a non-issue. Companies do buy cell minutes/data for their employees if they're expected to use a non-trivial amount for work, or even provide a work-issued smartphone. Must be a cultural thing, as the vast majority of mobile users are on prepaid since cell phones became widespread, but smartphone have totally obliterated older phones.

      On another post I saw that your flip phone costs you $22.40 every 3 months (or about $7.5/mo). Coincidentally I pay about the same (when converted to USD 'cause our currency is weak atm) on my prepaid smartphone for 75 voice minutes + 750MB data per month - no contracts so I buy that when I want, and if I buy before the previous one runs out the remaining minutes/data add up, so I've got 200+ minutes and gigabytes of data piled up on my phone 'cause I rarely spend my entire allowance in a month. I'm not on the best carrier either, I could get much better rates if I could be bothered to switch. And since receiving calls & SMS is always free, 2FA is within reach of everyone.

    8. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by tepples · · Score: 1

      My point was that smartphones & mobile data are so cheap that it's a non-issue.

      Cellular data might not be "so cheap that it's a non-issue" if your work involves making changes to files several megabytes in size. How many GB per month are you talking? And even then, you still have to issue smartphones to employees and manage them or, if you rely on BYOD, include a phone and plan stipend in their pay.

      Coincidentally I pay about the same (when converted to USD 'cause our currency is weak atm) on my prepaid smartphone for 75 voice minutes + 750MB data per month

      The North American cellular market is notorious for being far more cartel-like than that of, say, mainland Europe. Is there a solution, short of firing all your U.S. employees and moving your headquarters to Europe?

      receiving calls & SMS is always free

      True of Europe, false of North America.

    9. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      We're playing by your rules here. You said "large company". Show me a "large company" who's employees do any kind of significant portion of their work on public transport systems and you will have a point.

      Now back in reality any "large company" will have employees who spend lots of time working on documents mostly deskbound with the remainder in positions where they are already racking up cell bills.

    10. Re:They do if you pay employees' cell bills by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not even in Europe, I'm in a shitty ass-backwards South American country, and from what I've seen in my own traveling (or from what I've read/been told by other travelers) your situation is pretty much exclusively unique to the US (& maybe Canada?) - seems you're losing out to the rest of the planet.

      Tell random persons on the street around here "did you know that in the US you pay for receiving cell phone calls and text messages and smartphone almost always equals an expensive plan?" and the vast majority would say "that can't be true! you're making that up!" sprinkled with "really? that's fucked up".

      Cellular data might not be "so cheap that it's a non-issue" if your work involves making changes to files several megabytes in size. How many GB per month are you talking? And even then, you still have to issue smartphones to employees and manage them or, if you rely on BYOD, include a phone and plan stipend in their pay.

      Seems that when your telecom carriers aren't thoroughly fleecing you, it *is* a non-issue. My country's got high import taxes for technology goods & stuff, but it's a mainstream thing (even expected) that your employer either pays your phone bills or issues you a work phone if the job requires non-trivial voice/data usage. When every employer around me is doing it, it can't be that difficult or expensive as you put it.

      Is there a solution, short of firing all your U.S. employees and moving your headquarters to Europe?

      I don't know, but it seems that might be a reason why you guys are increasingly out of a job, can't really compete if you're getting so thoroughly ripped off in your home turf. Not that we're doing any better in that regard, or in other aspects like poverty gaps & quality of life.

      If I were in your position I probably wouldn't have a smartphone either, but maybe I wouldn't need to since I'd not be expected to use WhatsApp to communicate for work & leisure like I do here, so it sorta evens out I guess. Tough times, man.

      receiving calls & SMS is always free

      True of the rest of the world, false of North America.

      FTFY.

  12. Are Systemax PCs worth a damn anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Figure I'd post the question here since people commenting on this story might have recent ordering experience. I have 4 Systemax PCs at home all ordered from TigerDirect but the newest one is 3 years old. It's about time to order a new desktop but a coworker told me Tiger has gone to hell. I asked him to clarify and he said he couldn't get support on a monitor he ordered. I don't care about support, never had to use it, just wondering if I can still expect OK equipment from Tiger or if I should be expecting a case full of DOA parts or something. Has anyone ordered a Systemax desktop from Tiger in the last ~6 months and if so what's the word on them?

    1. Re: Are Systemax PCs worth a damn anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use newegg. They always have better deals it feels like.

      Who knows though. Read some reviews maybe.

  13. Agreed except power consumption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A modern power friendly i5 with internal graphics can do what your old i7 and discreet card could. That said, if you're a business running 500+ PCs that users leave powered on 24/7, it is extremely cost effective to modernize to 17w TDP processors with LPDDR3 or 4 and discreet graphics. In addition, for your older CPU, the CPU had a wake/sleep cycle measured in tens of milliseconds and was CPU only. A modern CPU and chipset (which makes it really one device spread across two chips) can sleep about 90% of the system in microseconds. So broadcast and multicast traffic keeping the PC from sleeping can use an additional 2-3w per hour in sleep vs. 40-50w. Multiple that by a thousand and it is a huge sales point as it works out to about 28.5 megawatt/hours of additional consumed power per month. Most nations will gladly cut corporate taxes using green credits to replace those older PCs.

    So while your point is valid, it doesn't scale. It's obvious that for a 1-10 person environment, you're entirely in the right. For a small enterprise, upgrading makes more sense. Add the additional cost of service agreements on old hardware and it's a no brainier to upgrade.

    1. Re:Agreed except power consumption by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Well, I was clearly looking at it from my consumer end view.

      For corporations this changes any way: 5 year old gear is amortized and should be replaced, just because the beancounters say so.

      However, I doubt you can totally offset the energy savings by purchasing new gear. Assume 500$ for a new machine (Business machines? Hell, you won't get them that cheap, but I'll run with it). I don't know how much my i7 rates, but I know it comes with a 90W powersupply. As such we can assume it uses that as a maximum. Assume a new i5 laptop will use half of that: 45W. So, you save 45W, which means you save 45*24*365 Wh = 394.2kWh over year. Let's assume you live in New York, which means you pay 18.1 cents per kWh (okay, values are from late 2011), which means you pay about 71$ less per year by the replacement. Assuming the 500$ investment, you need 7 years to break even. This is true regardless of scale (1 computer or 10000 computers)

      So, yes, energy is a factor, but if it were the only factor, it wouldn't be cost effective. Do, also note that in every assumption I was very very friendly with the "replace" argument: cheap replacement cost, expensive electricity....

      Of course, I might have miscalculated and you're right... who knows....

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  14. Use motherboard sales by tepples · · Score: 1

    Does it count computer parts? Perhaps people who build their own are such an insignificant %, but I really wonder what they use to count it.

    If I were trying to count desktop PCs built from parts, I'd use motherboard sales as a proxy. As for laptops built from parts, I see no evidence that barebooks are anything but "an insignificant %".

    Perhaps Windows activations?

    Counting motherboards would at least be consistent with product activation in recent versions of Windows, which uses the motherboard's identity to determine whether someone attempted to transfer an Windows license to a different computer.

  15. On for one-fourth of the week by tepples · · Score: 1

    That said, if you're a business running 500+ PCs that users leave powered on 24/7, it is extremely cost effective to

    As I understand it, the common case is that each PC is used only by one full-time employee, without different employees sharing it on different shifts. Does leaving the PCs on for only one-fourth of the week (42 hours on, 126 hours hibernating) change the math any?

  16. 4k video? by avandesande · · Score: 1

    I don't know how much it matters in other markets but seems to be a lot of interest in 4k gaming lately.

    --
    love is just extroverted narcissism
    1. Re:4k video? by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      I don't know how much it matters in other markets but seems to be a lot of interest in 4k gaming lately.

      4K and VR. I haven't replaced my entire desktop in 8 years (but I have upgraded the video card twice). The video card trick only works about twice though. After that the older CPU (and especially the older CPU's memory technology) really starts to drag it down. A GTX 1080 paired with an 8 year old CPU is substantially crippled. This is the year people who bought high end machines in the late '00s finally have to budge off the plateau they have been comfortably occupying all this time. 4K and VR are both seriously demanding, and no longer is dialing down the detail acceptable (or why did you buy 4x as many pixels to start with?).

  17. Some purposeful changes in PC designs by Pollux · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm just now in the process of replacing PCs in our school. We're buying Dell Micro PC's that you can mount immediately behind your monitor. When we throw in a SSD and fast-booting the BIOS, boot time for Windows 7 is less than 10 seconds.

    Now that PCs are smaller and faster, and electronic storage is becoming standard, it doesn't surprise me that they're becoming more appealing again.

    1. Re:Some purposeful changes in PC designs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm just now in the process of replacing PCs in our school. We're buying Dell Micro PC's that you can mount immediately behind your monitor. When we throw in a SSD and fast-booting the BIOS, boot time for Windows 7 is less than 10 seconds.

      About 3 seconds slower than Puppy Linux [which would be a fantastic choice for a school's computer].

      Now that PCs are smaller (...).

      Now, my monitors are not going to get smaller anytime soon. 32" and growing.

    2. Re:Some purposeful changes in PC designs by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      electronic storage is becoming standard, it doesn't surprise me that they're becoming more appealing again.

      Electronic storage will never be as reliable as cave paintings. Keep your fancy new tech to yourself.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    3. Re:Some purposeful changes in PC designs by jon3k · · Score: 1

      We do the same thing with these little lenovo machines. They charge through the nose for SSD still so we manually install them at a fraction of the cost. With most applications these days being SaaS, there's very little local storage required (although SSDs are getting very inexpensive).

    4. Re:Some purposeful changes in PC designs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ohhh, Mr. Fancy Pants! Keep your fancy cave paintings in your fancy gated cave communities! I wish we had had cave paintings!

      We draw with sticks in the mud! That's assuming we can get sticks! And some days we can't even get decent mud!!

  18. Accounting Cycles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason that the PC market has picked up is Depreciation. Businesses tend to replace them only when it's cost effective to do so and this means depreciation has been fully taken.

  19. Microsoft broke a lot of computers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The windows 10 update broke a lot of computers around the world. How many of you have dealt with a family member with a Windows 10 update issue. Try working in a place where old people come in with busted computers all day.

  20. FTFA by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    "The estimates differ because Gartner does not count Chromebooks as part of its figures"

    1. Re:FTFA by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      My point is that because Chromebooks weren't counted doesn't mean that the PCs that were counted consisted entirely of Windows machines.

  21. Remote users already have connectivity by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    Our remote users already have some sort of remote connectivity - hence the term "remote" user.

    If your organization is bigger than one location, it doesn't really matter where your applications and data are hosted. Someone isn't going to be in the same building as your server farm and will need to access those applications and data remotely.

  22. Universities also aren't subject to truancy law by tepples · · Score: 1

    Do it on the computers your school has available for that shit.

    Which complicates logistics of the student's ride home if the student has to be picked up from school at a different time of day each day depending on whether he has homework that day.

    Even universities provide computers for everyone to do their lab work on.

    Universities also allow the student to go to the computer lab as needed between class periods, unlike high schools that enforce truancy law and require the student to be seated in a "study hall" room. In addition, universities tend to pass a much larger cost of required materials onto a student than public high schools. For example, it's more reasonable to expect a university student to afford a laptop, as it's counted against the student loan (or at least it was at the college I attended).

  23. The download, edit locally, upload paradigm by tepples · · Score: 1

    Someone isn't going to be in the same building as your server farm and will need to access those applications and data remotely.

    But that doesn't mean said access has to be continuous throughout all hours that an employee is on the clock. Prior to webmail's prevalence, IMAP email clients were popular. These would download email from a server while online, allow the user to read messages and compose replies while offline, and send the replies the next time the user goes online. The same was true of Usenet clients. And the same is true of distributed version control: you can git merge while online, edit and test offline, git commit offline, and then git push once you're online again. But if you're limited to Chrome apps, even "edit and test" may have to happen while using a remote desktop connection.

  24. farging idjit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And suddenly, cost becomes a barrier for a user seeking to transition from passive to active.

    yes indeed the iron knives cost more than the stone ones

    "suddenly" the idiot discovers man's oldest "problem"

  25. M$ by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    " Microsoft's free Windows 10 upgrade comes to an end on July 29th, and IDC believes it may prompt some PC users into buying new machines"

    They'll likely buy more machines when M$ removes this malware from them.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise