Slashdot Mirror


British Spy Agency GCHQ Used URL Shortener To Honeypot Arab Spring Activists (vice.com)

The British spy agency GCHQ used a custom URL shortener and Twitter sockpuppets to influence and infiltrate activists during the Iran revolution of 2009 and the Arab Spring of 2011, reports Motherboard, citing leaked documents by Edward Snowden. From the article: The GCHQ's special unit, known as the Joint Threat Research Intelligence Group or JTRIG, was first revealed in 2014, when leaked top secret documents showed it tried to infiltrate and manipulate -- using "dirty trick" tactics such as honeypots -- online communities including those of Anonymous hacktivists, among others. The group's tactics against hacktivists have been previously reported, but its influence campaign in the Middle East has never been reported before. I was able to uncover it because I was myself targeted in the past, and was aware of a key detail, a URL shortening service, that was actually redacted in Snowden documents published in 2014. A now-defunct free URL shortening service -- lurl.me -- was set up by GCHQ that enabled social media signals intelligence. Lurl.me was used on Twitter and other social media platforms for the dissemination of pro-revolution messages in the Middle East.

40 comments

  1. Slashdot Messaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honeypot? Or just not working today?

  2. fake news again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What changed in 2009 Iranian revolution?
    I dont remember this happening...

    1. Re:fake news again by Gavagai80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      What changed is the protests scared the leadership so much they arrested many reformists and disqualified them from future elections. Former speaker Karroubi is still under house arrest today, and the media is still forbidden to even publish pictures of former president Khatami.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
  3. US agencies do this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't need Snowden to tell you that.

    1. Re: US agencies do this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they can just eavesdrop on the traffic to the server.

      but what kind of a hacktivist would just go opening url shortener links? surely they must know that those sites only exist for two purposes, ads and tracking(hiding a ref parameter counts as tracking)

    2. Re: US agencies do this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why the troll? Parent is 100% correct.

    3. Re: US agencies do this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So every fucking country having imperialistic agenda? With the purpose of getting those nasty activists killed? And corrupting actual democratic progress while shitting in the nest, burning bridges years in careful crafting and sowing the seeds of counter-action? Nice job, idiots.

  4. Iran revolution of 2009??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There was no revolution in Iran in 2009.

    The last one was in the 1970s when they overthrew the Shah and installed the current theocracy.

  5. The Chinese got it right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we wonder why the China has their Great Firewall? Because of this, right here folks.

  6. What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What's the problem here? A bunch of Muslims who want to kill us were monitored so the threats could be stopped. I fail to see any problem here. Besides, this wouldn't even be necessary if Muslims would just stop trying to kill nonbelievers. But until Islam reforms itself, it will be necessary to monitor potential threats.

    1. Re:What's the problem? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      GCHQ is getting as bad as the CIA for screwing with other countries. Eventually it will come back to bite us in the arse.

      Also, there is no democratic mandate for this.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:What's the problem? by fedos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Go home, Donald, you're drunk.

    3. Re:What's the problem? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      From the story I'm not really so sure. Is it the terrorists, or the secular democratic revolutionaries opposing them who were targeted? Arab Spring wasn't the people you're describing, but your brush sounds so broad I don't think you'd fit another group of people in the picture.

    4. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Every powerful or wannabe country in the world have foreign intelligence services whose goal is to promote their state interests above all others using any methods deemed to work. The CIA doesn't have to obey any foreign country laws just like the FSB or MOSSAD. The only law these countries adhere to is don't get caught. That's why foreign embassy's are staffed by foreign intelligence operatives so when they do get caught they can claim diplomatically immunity and be asked to leave the country. It's the stupid fuckers like yourself who seem to think the US intelligence agencies are some how unique and all the other countries are just poor little victims of the big ole bad USA. It's this ignorant mindset that has allowed the Russian and Chinese foreign intelligence agencies to go about their business being totally ignored because after all it's only the CIA who actually spy and run foreign operations. Russia invades and annexes a country and tells the world that it wasn't their forces involved and those with their heads shoved so far up their assess trying to track down the nefarious CIA activities believe them. Do you know why you will never see anyone dumping reams of data from Russia or China on the internet? The populations in both countries have grown up in societies where the punishment for such activities are death for both the perpetrator and the perpetrators families. The authoritarian and outright dictatorships around the world are living large because everyone is spending all their time and effort trying to convince the world that it is the US that is the bad guy and therefore all the worlds problems should be laid at their doorstep. It lets the true despots of the world sleep better at night knowing they get a pass for anything they want to do.

    5. Re:What's the problem? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Go home, Donald, you're drunk.

      Hey, I think you have a good idea here! A debate between Donald and Hilary promises to be both viscous and boring.

      Let's add a new rule, that would require each candidate to drink a shot of Tequila after answering each question.

      After an hour, the debate would be both entertaining, and a hoot and a half!

      Let's make that happen!

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    6. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you saying the u.s. is not the bad guy most of the time?

      There is a lot of available information which contradicts that position.

    7. Re:What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "getting as bad"?! The US only emerged as a player on the world stage after WW2, and all the cynical shit the CIA got up starting in the 1950's to was learned from UK intelligence.

      I'm not saying that there isn't corruption on all sides all around the world, but imperial and post imperial UK were absolute masters in statecraft skullduggery. Take your bows!

    8. Re: What's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you missed his point. The other agencies just don't have a shit ton of leaked documents to expose all this shit.

    9. Re:What's the problem? by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Guess you've never heard of the KGB.

  7. No by s.petry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The leaked information shows the edge of the map, not the map. Look at political turmoil world wide, not just in what is convenient. Look at oppression world wide, not just the edge of the map. This is not some specific high tech attack that takes huge funding and technical skills. It's easy and cheap, and only requires the desire to influence other Governments.

    Here, the UK is called out for influencing other Governments. If you believe it was only in those two countries you are a fool, sorry.

    By the way people in the US, isn't this the same thing people are claiming Russia is doing and we are so offended by it? Spitting in the wind often leaves your face messy.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I thought Slashdotters were opposed to censorship and believed that all people should have as much information as they desire so they can make the best decisions possible about their governments. Yet, here you are, offended that a British spy agency would post censorship bypass tricks and keep a log of who reposted their advice.

      So censorship is only evil if it's censoring porn? Or is your problem with them keeping a log of people who reposted the advice (people who might be requesting asylum in the near future)?

  8. LOL I guess that... by gsurbey · · Score: 1

    lure.me was deemed too obvious.

    1. Re:LOL I guess that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinking the same thing.

  9. Guess they never counted on Obama... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...to throw away a perfectly good opportunity.

  10. JTRIG is a Bureau of Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Lurl.me was used on Twitter and other social media platforms for the dissemination of pro-revolution messages in the Middle East.

    > implying GCHQ didn't sell every one of these poor bastards out to Iran as part of the nuclear deal

  11. Dropbox is a honeypot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask anyone you know who uses it- they never encrypt anything.

  12. You had me at "Dirty trick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "using "dirty trick" tactics such as "

    Ah! Ah! Stop right there.

    You *do* realise that they're *spies*, right? It's their *job* to use *all* the dirty tricks to get the information they need. Saying that they're using such dirty tricks is redundant!

    1. Re: You had me at "Dirty trick" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah but what did they need the information for and was meddling in affairs of the arabs signed on by the parliament.

      what was the benefit of this and was there any representetively democratic oversight.

      you know uk and usa would try to extradite people for lesser meddling.

  13. Re:Sounds like.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know your computer broadcasts its IP address every time you post here?

  14. Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What else would you expect from an authoritarian shithole like the UK?

  15. secret _is_ censorship by s.petry · · Score: 1

    So the Russian Government funding programs to trick UK citizens into reading propaganda is fine, and me simply stating that they should not do this is "censorship".

    You are either a troll or a shill, because nobody that stupid can type in sentence/paragraph form.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    1. Re:secret _is_ censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that censorship part wasn't a personal attack on you, it was right from the story. The limey spies were sharing information on how to bypass local censorship. That's about all the social media accounts being discussed in this story were used for, to share proxies, VPNs, and other ways to get past state-level censorship.

      The other half of the story is that they hosted a URL shortener so they could watch the statistics of which social media personas were more effective at getting people to follow the links and bypass the local government enacted censorship.

  16. Re:What's the problem? - ISRAEL!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A bunch of Muslims who want to kill us were monitored so the threats could be stopped. I fail to see any problem here."

    The problem here is that it is the Zionists who want to kill everyone, not the Muslims. Muslims are patsies. Get a clue.

  17. Google, Twitter, Quora et al do this every day by Martin+S. · · Score: 1

    There is nothing shocking in the article and the evidence presented actual proves very little, other than they are using analytics's just like every body else using the web. Why is this shocking when spooks do this but not when Google, Twitter and other do this all the time?

    Hell I've done it on occasions to track how many people have downloaded things I've published in different places.

  18. Blinders by s.petry · · Score: 1

    Lurl.me was used on Twitter and other social media platforms for the dissemination of pro-revolution messages in the Middle East.

    They were not just listening. Try again keeping my quote in mind when reading the FULL context of the article, not the parts you want to cherry pick as acceptable behavior. I know it's hard, confirmation bias is easy.

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  19. Re:What's the problem? - ISRAEL!!!! by mcswell · · Score: 1

    If someone were keeping score, it'd be MR 5000-something, Z-0

  20. Re:ALL FUCKING SPIES GO TO HELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They modded you -1, (absolutely true)