Slashdot Mirror


A Look Inside Tesla's $5 Billion Gigafactory (cnet.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from CNET: A joint effort between Tesla and Panasonic, the Gigafactory is a $5 billion project that will create the world's premier battery manufacturing facility. The Gigafactory will not only be physically larger than any other cell-packing plant on the planet, it'll produce more batteries than the entire industry did back in 2013. That's a lot of batteries, enough to meet Tesla's 500,000-per-year manufacturing goals -- and potentially even more. When completed, the factory will cover five million square feet of the desert floor just outside of Reno, Nevada. Right now, the uncompleted but already-operational factory sits on 800,000 square feet. Over the next four years the building will grow and grow again, swelling to its full size while production dials up simultaneously. The roof will be covered in solar panels, with the goal of producing enough electricity to power the entire thing. Tesla is already assembling Powerwall units here, but the first Model 3 battery packs are expected to roll off the line by the middle of next year. From there, Tesla will have to scale quickly to meet the company's Model 3 production goals for 2018. And, once the company does, the cost savings will begin. The "Tesla Gigafactory Tour" video can also be viewed on YouTube via Roadshow.

60 comments

  1. Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by ls671 · · Score: 1

    It makes me feel like in a mix of Blade Runner and Total Recall.

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    1. Re: Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...now, witness the power of thus fully armed and operational manufacturing facility!..

    2. Re:Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by ls671 · · Score: 1

      Oupps. Sorry Elon, I forgot The Matrix ;-)

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re: Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good, good, you are reading this in my voice right now.

    4. Re:Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it's just outside Reno, the only place where the best sushi in town is the one that's eaten off the stomachs of strippers in... can't remember the name of the casino. And where you can buy .223 FMJ at the supermarket.

    5. Re: Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Came here to write this, thank you for doing it for me

    6. Re:Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Elon here,

      No problem. Your shilling is greatly appreciated. You're welcome to come to South Africa anytime and give me a complementary blow job. You've earned it!

    7. Re:Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by mycroft822 · · Score: 1

      How many decades has it been since you were in Reno? That's not a thing here, but it is in Vegas.

    8. Re:Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by arglebargle_xiv · · Score: 1

      About 15 years. Yeah, it may have changed since then. Still, going up in the hills outside Reno to shoot bottles stuck in the ground was fun.

    9. Re: Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometang, sometang clouds dark solar panels, something, something powerwall laser charged Commpleeeeete!!!!

    10. Re:Makes me feel in a mix a Blade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that cool, just looks like a normal automated factory.

  2. Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    The roof will be covered in solar panels, with the goal of producing enough electricity to power the entire thing.

    Solar panels are nice, but how will they store the power for when the sun don't shine?

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re: Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by nsuccorso · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, how the hell are they going to store power at a massive high-capacity battery factory?

    2. Re: Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re: Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I misread that as Bezos the (space) clown...

    4. Re: Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by Gordo_1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, one thought is that they could put the building on a huge hydraulic lift and in this way store solar energy as potential energy, then slowly drop the building to release that energy post-daylight. This has the added advantage of forcing workers to stay inside rolling lithium until the wee hours of the morning when, presumably, the floor reaches ground level.

    5. Re: Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by serbanp · · Score: 4, Informative

      The unbelievably loud sound you just heard was the 140dB whoosh passing over your head. Don't fret though, you're not alone, it appears that some retards with mod points were startled by the sound too...

    6. Re: Solar panels are nice, but what about storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alternatively, they understood it perfectly. And decided to play along.

  3. Re: A lot of eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the "basket" is the Nevada desert, which is probably one of the most stable environments in the world. Certainly safe enough to store nuclear waste for centuries.

    I think a big battery factory will be fine for the few decades it exists.

  4. Re: A lot of eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a big battery factory will be fine for the few decades it exists.

    It's still there in 2851.

  5. Right now, the uncompleted but already-operational by duckintheface · · Score: 1

    ... factory sits on 800,000 square feet.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --
    "He took a duck in the face at 250 knots." -- William Gibson, Pattern Recognition
  6. Re: A lot of eggs by quenda · · Score: 1

    The location is fine, though I think the main reason for choosing Nevada was Tax avoidance.
    I just can't see why it all needs to be in the one location. Maybe that too comes down to accounting reasons - they can negotiate better taxpayer subsidies if its one big factory.

    (And I apologise to anyone offended by my penis metaphor for a vanity project.)

  7. Re:A lot of eggs by Chuq · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just 30 minutes ago, Elon was speaking at the opening party and said that long term there would be a gigafactory of this scale on every continent, mentioning Europe and Asia (specifically China) by name as the planned locations for the next factories.

    --
    - Chuq
  8. Grow and grow....Swelling to full size...mmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A joint effort between Drumpf and Panadrumpf, the Gigadrumpf is a $5 billion project that will create the world's premier drumpf manufacturing facility. The Gigadrumpf will not only be physically larger than any other drumpf-packing plant on the planet, it'll produce more drumpfs than the entire industry did back in 2013. That's a lot of drumpfs, enough to meet Drumpf's 500,000-per-year manufacturing goals -- and potentially even more. When completed, the factory will cover five million square feet of the desert floor just outside of Reno, Nevada. Right now, the uncompleted but already-operational factory sits on 800,000 square feet. Over the next four years the building will grow and grow again, swelling to its full size while production dials up simultaneously. The roof will be covered in drumpf panels, with the goal of producing enough drumpficity to power the entire thing. Drumpf is already assembling Powerdrumpf units here, but the first Drumpf 3 drumpf packs are expected to roll off the line by the middle of next year. From there, Drumpf will have to scale quickly to meet the company's Drumpf 3 production goals for 2018. And, once the company does, the cost savings will begin.

  9. Re: A lot of eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he wants economy of scale, and vertical integration. And no warehouse taxes in NV...

  10. Re: A lot of eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The location is fine, though I think the main reason for choosing Nevada was Tax avoidance.
    I just can't see why it all needs to be in the one location. Maybe that too comes down to accounting reasons - they can negotiate better taxpayer subsidies if its one big factory.

    (And I apologise to anyone offended by my penis metaphor for a vanity project.)

    largest lithium mine in USA is half an hour away...think on it a bit

  11. Re: A lot of eggs by quenda · · Score: 3, Informative

    Coal-fired power stations are sometimes built near the mines, and sometimes on the other side of the world.
    Lithium ore is worth a hundred times as much as coal per tonne, so freight costs for extra distance is not a big deal.
    Where are the ore refineries? (not that it matters much)

  12. Re:downside by inflex · · Score: 1

    The lifetime environmental impact of lithium storage technology is less than that of alternatives. Our usage of lead-acid batteries is more toxic and we have a tremendous number of those being discarded each day, without even accounting for the impacts of fossil fuels involved in power generation and transport.

  13. Bad news for battery dreamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The fact that Musk has just sunk a bajillion dollars into manufacturing lithium cells suggests there isn't going to be anything significantly better coming our way any time soon. Prepare for 2 decades if incremental improvements

    1. Re:Bad news for battery dreamers by guruevi · · Score: 1

      There have been plenty of improvements over the last few years, several covered here on Slashdot, they improve lifetime, storage capacity and safety usually by "incremental" changes, but these changes are happening at break neck speeds, no traditional factory, once operational, can catch up.

      The only question is whether they will implement them right away (expensive short term but worth it long term) by modularizing their facility so changes can be implemented to the process or go for the quarterly profit and produce the cheapest possible battery.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Bad news for battery dreamers by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It doesn't mean that. It means that Tesla can be profitable with this technology now. Would you rather they wait five years to earn those profits so the batteries can be smaller?

      They can use the profits from this generation to ensure the next. That's how and why capitalism works.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    3. Re:Bad news for battery dreamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So he built the factory for free?

    4. Re:Bad news for battery dreamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm far from a Musk fan but I wouldn't suggest this will stifle production of newer batteries. If something better comes out it could be produced by someone else or it could likely even be produced there. The entire factory looks incredibly generic - all those robotic arms are standard components of an automated factory and could be reprogrammed to build other things easily.

      If this were something like a fab with integrated deposition/sputtering/etching/pinning/etc all in form factors too small to get your hand inside of with the sole purpose of making lots of ICs I'd agree, but it's not.

  14. Re:A lot of eggs by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

    Panasonic are building this thing with Tesla, to produce Panasonic batteries. It's likely they will build other plants, and LG have already started on their own.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  15. Tesla hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't really understand how this is the first battery factory in the world? I've visited a large battery factory in the 80's of previous century and I've worked there as a student in the nineties when I was studying in the university in the nearby city.
     
    I'm pretty sure that this 5 billion costing, new project is a lot larger than the battery factory I worked at. And I'm also pretty sure that the new kinds of batteries are a lot better then those that were produced in the battery factory I mentioned, but that also has to do with "Law of the handicap of a head start".
     
    The battery factory I worked at started in the 19th century as some kind of personal project in the stables of an engineer. A person who was among the first to see the future in battery cells to power self driving vehicles. This factory is still an artifact of the 1950's when Europe had to be rebuild and was for a long time the biggest supplier of battery cells for electric vehicles. Because the 1950's was the era of gasoline powered cars, those battery cells were only sold to vehicles for other industries, like fork lifts, trams, trains, sub marines, delivery vans, ... The factory is build in the 1050's style. And it has the typical modernist look, although it also looks kind of dated with this 50's style. Inside old and new style are fighting each other and you really see it's an old factory. Typical for factories that had a steady growth I guess.

    But still at its height it produced 80% of the world wide production of battery cells. This makes this old factory, relatively the former biggest battery factory in the world, since Tesla's battery factory probably will never reach a 80% market penetration.

    Another thing is that the factory I'm talking about grew organically. It grew according to the demand. And its mother company is now building yet another factory because of the growing demand for battery cells since the electrical car hype. Tesla just builds a 5 billion costing factory to produce the batteries for 500,000 cars a year. But until now they only sell 50,000 cars a year. So lets see who is the 'best battery cell factory'. Is it the one that started in a horse stable and exists 142 years and has been steadily growing. Or is it the one that immediately becomes the biggest factory in the world thanks to 'free money' without even having customers to cell the batteries it produces a 20% production capacity?

    1. Re:Tesla hype by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1
      Companies that grow organically have historically performed better, but there are exceptions. Musk is going to be able to mask a lot of financial issues by virtue of cult like investors whose eyes can be pointed to an idealistic goal.

      And, once the company does, the cost savings will begin.

      Cost will reduce, but from what? Initial production will be very expensive. IThe question is when will they cost significantly less than the competitors? f you include the cost of money, there is no way this factory can produce on a lower cost basis until it is near full capacity and selling the output. But if Musk "buys" a bunch of the initial production using his own capital (using them for solar storage), he can inflate the cost artficially, then claim the cost is reducing on future production runs. As long as he's got huge capital and investor allegiance, he'll be able to play the game.

      Production at scale does inevitably reduce cost, but once you get to a certain point the gains become small. If Tesla oversized it they could find themselves in a world of hurt. Competitors with out all of that sunk capital could be in a better position to adapt to changes.

    2. Re:Tesla hype by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Posts like this makes one sad.

      First it is focused around money. Secondly all dangers and options again are: around money.

      Sorry, I'm really happy that we have a few people on the planet who have technology knowledge, a vision and money to realize their ideas.

      So, looking at the money, what happens if he is not building his own factory?
      a) he is dependent on the world market (and long term deals) for batteries -- money risk
      b) if a new pad or phone or exoskeleton (or whatever) emerges he has to compete about a vital resource for his cars -- money risk
      c) probably he even has to cut down production, because of b) -- money risk
      d) he loses money on preordered cars because of c)
      e) stock prices of companies he own might change rapidly so that it influences his monetary options

      Now lets look at technology
      i) the designs of his car batteries are depended on mass market LI batteries available
      ii) if he has his own factory, his engineers can optimize the battery stack and he can build to that spec
      iii) monetary he is only dependent on local legislation and LI prices
      iv) as soon as technology changes, e.g. to the new aluminium batteries, he can partly convert his factories
      v) I guess there are good uses for his batteries in his space program, too

      Bottom line: I would suggest to once play some resource oriented RTS or TBSG where the relevant resources are not money/gold. And can not be exchanged (freely or not) with money or gold.

      If I was him. I would do the exact same thing. Why negotiating a year with dozens of battery manufactors to seal deals for long term car production (and repeating this year after year) when I now only need to buy lithium?

      There is an irreplaceable resource, not even money can buy: time!

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    3. Re:Tesla hype by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

      Posts like this makes one sad.

      First it is focused around money. Secondly all dangers and options again are: around money

      But when Musk talks money and promises great financial reward its OK? Maybe you should just donate your money to "the cause".

    4. Re:Tesla hype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk is cheap. If you are confident of a Musk failure sell the stock short or go long on a competitor.

    5. Re:Tesla hype by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      I don't know about what Musk is talking, he is not talking in Germany.

      Ofc money is ok. But technology is more important. You can not eat money, and an AC does not run from money.

      Maybe you should just donate your money to "the cause".
      I don't donate money for a cause, unless at gun point. I'm not "religious" and need "a cause" to enjoy my life.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  16. Re:A lot of eggs by Alomex · · Score: 1

    Are there sound technical reasons for this concentration,

    Automation. If you are making one an hour, and you need one last screw at the top is cheaper to hire a person to put it in. If you are making 1000 an hour you can afford to design, build and program a robot that adds said screw.

  17. Re:downside by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 0

    In what third world country do you live that lead batteries are not collected and recycled by law?

    Somalia?

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
  18. Re:A lot of eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, but what's the point of building one in Antarctica?

  19. Re: A lot of eggs by kenh · · Score: 2

    largest lithium mine in USA is half an hour away...think on it a bit

    Ok, I'll think on it a bit - will the factory take in raw, unprocessed lithium or will it go to a refining plant to prepare the lithium for manufacture?

    With the mine 30 minutes away or 8 hours away, what is the difference? the lithium still needs to be loaded on to a truck at the mine and then unloaded at the factory - the only difference is the extended travel time, which is really quite cheap.

    --
    Ken
  20. Re: A lot of eggs by kenh · · Score: 1

    Once all the ice melts, I think it will become a highly sought-out retirement destination - and retirees drive a lot of golf carts, which could be powered by Panasonic batteries.

    --
    Ken
  21. Re: downside by kenh · · Score: 2

    Our usage of lead-acid batteries is more toxic and we have a tremendous number of those being discarded each day

    Your ignorance is showing. Lead-acid batteries are recycled, with recyclers typically paying a decent price for the 'dead' battery. BTW, it is also illegal to 'discard' lead-acid batteries - why not take a field trip down to your local auto repair shop and ask them how they discard lead-acid batteries?

    --
    Ken
  22. Not a look inside by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

    I rarely watch video links, but as a Tesla investor, I thought I should. And that video was not a look inside the Gigafactory. That video was a look at the outside of the Gigafactory, plus a few seconds of the Panasonic CEO (chairman?/spokesman?) being funny. And Elon Musk saying the final production capacity may be three times higher than originally designed.

    Mr. Musk likes to show off his factories to the world, for one reason or another. It appears that Panasonic believes in keeping trade secrets secret, and is getting their way on this joint venture. The only thing on display besides the outside of the factory and a Model 3 was a model of a section of the factory with various industrial robot models scattered through it. Probably irrelevant to real production, if not actively misleading. It looked maybe like where battery packs could be assembled. Anything involving cell assembly is being kept quite tightly under wraps.

    Aren't we fortunate that we have our close Japanese allies available to teach US businesses how to build a highly efficient, high technology factory. (Anybody who lived through the 80s should have boggled at that statement, but here we are.)

    1. Re:Not a look inside by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 2

      Tours were given of the inside of the factory; and video was allowed. Not the most sensitive areas, though. Video link.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    2. Re:Not a look inside by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Tours were given of the inside of the factory; and video was allowed. Not the most sensitive areas, though.

      So I watched that whole tedious hour. I've had enough shaky cam to last me for another decade.

      I see I was completely and totally correct. They didn't show one square centimeter of the second floor, where Panasonic is building their cell production line. The presses Panasonic will use on the first floor were covered in solid black tarpaulins, according to the tour guide specifically at Panasonic's demand. Literally under wraps, not just figuratively. Even Tesla is being cagey, insisting that people using cameras don't use zoom (how they can tell, I don't know), and herding people away from a robot control station, repeatedly.

      And somebody at Tesla misspelled "flare" on the emergency handling sign on the door near the end. Tsk tsk.

      They have detailed instructions what to do if one of the packs is dropped. Now we know why they insist on professional installation for Powerwalls. If it falls off the wall, bad things could happen.

      Amusingly, the electric pallet jacks on the floor are powered with lead-acid batteries. I guess Elon can't design everything himself.

    3. Re:Not a look inside by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      So I watched that whole tedious hour. I've had enough shaky cam to last me for another decade.

      Ouch. I probably should have put a warning on it. I guess I spent less than half an hour watching it. I downloaded it and used mplayer to play it. That makes skipping through it by minutes easy. That was still more than it deserved.

      They didn't show one square centimeter of the second floor, where Panasonic is building their cell production line.

      I said they excluded the most sensitive areas.

      I was amazed that so many wanted to go to the event. Visiting the Nevada desert in July doesn't sound like fun.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
  23. Re: Should build it in Mexico by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump's wall will put an end to all of that.

  24. Re: A lot of eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm listening, go on...

    Sounds kinda nice.

  25. Re: A lot of eggs by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'll think on it a bit - will the factory take in raw, unprocessed lithium or will it go to a refining plant to prepare the lithium for manufacture?

    Old car factories would take in raw material from one side, and cars rolled out the other side. Seems Tesla may be going back to that. I recently read that Hyundai smelts its own steel. Takes in raw materials, and outputs cars. No reason Tesla wouldn't process the ore themselves, if it looks like it'll save money or improve quality.

  26. Re:A lot of eggs by Chuq · · Score: 1

    Cheaper cooling requirements.

    --
    - Chuq