Slashdot Mirror
Scientist Who Sparked 'A Revolution in Chemistry' Dies at 70 (washingtonpost.com)
Ahmed Zewail pioneered a technique for using lasers to monitor chemical reactions, which the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences said sparked "a revolution in chemistry and adjacent sciences." Slashdot reader Provocateur writes, "The Washington Post has the story...citing his prizewinning research in femtochemistry..."
Slashdot covered Zewail's Nobel prize in 1999, as well as his 2001 claim to have resolved Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. "Mathematics, mechanics, and chemistry were among the fields that gave me a special satisfaction..." he says in the Post's article, adding "for reasons unknown (to me), my mind kept asking 'how' and 'why.' "
Slashdot covered Zewail's Nobel prize in 1999, as well as his 2001 claim to have resolved Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. "Mathematics, mechanics, and chemistry were among the fields that gave me a special satisfaction..." he says in the Post's article, adding "for reasons unknown (to me), my mind kept asking 'how' and 'why.' "
Not smart enough that he couldn't undead himself.
Well, he was one of three muslim science nobel prize winners in history (the other two being Abdus Salam and Aziz Sancar). And there are 1.5 billion muslims. By contrast, jewish scientists have won over 100 nobel prizes, and there are only 15 million jews. I guess this means that a muslim is about 5,000 times less likely to become a renowned scientist than a jew is. So while muslim scientists aren't oxymorons, they're an exceedingly rare occurrence.
Dr. Zewail worked for years to raise money and generate political interest in creating a science-based university and research campus near Cairo...
“A part of the world that pioneered science and mathematics during Europe’s dark ages is now lost in a dark age of illiteracy and knowledge deficiency,” he wrote, adding that he wished the $1.5 billion in annual support that the United States gives to Egypt would accent “scientific and industrial cooperation” instead of going overwhelmingly toward the purchase of military equipment.
He managed to rise above the political problems in that region to try and make the world a better place.
We barely understand life and aging. Come on chemists, physicists and mathematicians, let's get working on this so we don't die at 70 with unfinished lives.
Its nice when you don't have to live in 3rd world conditions.
Its nice when you don't have to live in 3rd world conditions.
Millions of muslims live in countries with per capita GDPs that would place them in the 1st world. Instead of using their wealth to educate, they use it to pay for imports and to keep women uneducated and economically isolated. Even Ahmed Zewail, a rare example of an exemplary muslim scientist, did almost all of his important work will living in America.
There is some effort to change things, such as King Saud University, a first rate research university where women are treated like human beings, but that is a rare exception, and is generating a lot of conservative push-back.
Oxymoron.
Muslims once invented chemistry, astronomy, and mathematics. Then Saudi Arabia gained influence of the faith and ownership of the holy cities.
Was my freshman Chem 2 prof at Caltech. Smart guy. Inspired lecturer. But group theory only inspired quantum chemisty inspired me to change my major to EE.
that shit linked to is laughable
> Millions of muslims live in countries with per capita GDPs that would place them in the 1st world.
Such as?
Its nice when you get to make hand-waving arguments that can't be examined. Very convincing.
Doesn't matter. Per capita GDP doesn't take wealth distribution into consideration.
Historically new discoveries have been made by the upper middle class, wealthy enough to afford to do the science but not wealthy enough to dick around with the royalty.
Poor people are to busy working and can't afford to do research anyway.
It's not a coincidence that countries with a functional social support system have more Nobel laureates per capita
Notice that the list of Nobel laureates per capita correlates better with social expenditure per capita (Sort by GDP per capita) than it does with (R&D) spending
So the numbers indicate that the kind of research that leads to Nobel laureates isn't limited by the money the researches have but rather the combined brain power of the researchers. (My guess regarding the cause of this correlation.)
If you want better research to be done you need to enable more people to do it and not just limit it to those that can afford the education needed.
Sweden, Finland, and Switzerland were the third world as well. It turns out that third world conditions can be quite nice!
Ezekiel 23:20
Qatar, UAE, Kuwait, Brunei, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia have all per-capita GDP significantly higher than some of the poor EU countries like Poland or Slovakia, all while having a population of about 45 million people.
Ezekiel 23:20
Muslims once invented chemistry, astronomy, and mathematics.
Uhhh...that would be a nope.
Ezekiel 23:20
Ok I'll take the bait here.
Seriously? A tiny, minuscule fraction of the scientific community works on anything that could be weaponized. In the US, at least, if you are funded for weapons research you usually do not have an open license to publish. Zewail's research was not weaponized. Not even Einstein's Nobel-winning research was weaponized.
I fail to see the immorality of publishing research results when there is no aspect to it that can be used to hurt people. Should the cancer researcher not publish her results? Or the polymer chemist? These fields win Nobel Prizes, not the guy who invented the latest anthrax dispersal mechanism.
Your argument can be turned around: are you implying that your own research can be weaponized, which is why you don't publish? If so, where is your moral compass?
Technological advances come as a result of scientific research. If scientists (western, eastern, Muslim, Christian, Jewish, anyone) shouldn't publish research, then how will we progress? How will we cure disease, or got to Mars?
This isn't about religion, but is about differences in culture. As a case in point, in the US we have many Christian fundamentalists that believe that God created the earth a few thousand years ago. That's patently wrong, but that culture does not value science the way that other Christian-dominated cultures or communities do. Some cultures and nationalities value scientific research, others don't. Those that do, produce more high profile research, which goes noticed by the Nobel Committee.
I bet you did not know that algebra is an Arabic word.
Have you done any research into History at all? I'm not one to defend terrorism, however the modern concept of the scientific method from Islam. Say what you will about Muslims but it is not correct to say that they do not have a strong scientific pedigree.
Second world isn't exactly lacking in scientist either.
It's almost as if it is a cold war expression that doesn't apply to the current world anymore.
A bit like classifying humans in alpha/beta and completely forget that the alpha male was a violent serial rapist and that alpha females would gladly go for beta males when given the choice.
When you take an expression without reading the fine print you end up using them in situations where they don't apply and you end up with nonsentical ideas like the wormhole theory.
....and what OP is saying is that the wealth in those countries is very concentrated so GDP is a poor benchmark.
Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
I had the honor and privilege of meeting Dr. Zewail and attending a private lecture while at university. His daughter was my upper division biochemistry professor and he was kind enough to drop in and give us a lecture while he was visiting. He was a brilliant thinker not just in the world of femto-spectroscopy, but overall. He was approachable and witty. He will be missed as a father, a fellow human and for his contributions to the scientific world.
Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
Oxycontin.
I bet you did not know that assassin is an Arabic word.
why has so little changed in chemistry?
Did he figure out how to make the meth other colors than just blue?
When we were the "third world" Sweden were referred to as "filth-Sweden". People lived in appalling conditions, malnutrition, parasites and decease were extremely common. People still talk jokingly about putting out unwanted children and elderly "to the wolves". Sweden is a real harsh land and surviving for more than a couple of week without previous food stores and good shelter/heat is close to impossible.
What happened in Sweden was that we got a combination of religion and good leaders (sadly we have seen a good leader in many decades in Sweden). People stopped drinking their harvest, started working together to build a better country for our selves.
What the 3rd world need isn't help from us. They need good leaders and good life philosophies. Better leaders and a sane religion can make all the difference... Sadly we are taking after them instead, shit leaders and shit philosophies were even the "nice" people are consumed by hate and egomania.
....and what OP is saying is that the wealth in those countries is very concentrated so GDP is a poor benchmark.
Except their wealth is not particulary concentrated. For instance, Qatar, the wealthiest Arab country, has a Gini coefficient about the same as America.
...and so is alcohol, but people were drinking it even in prehistoric times before there was any Arabic, or even Arabs themselves. So, your point is?
Ezekiel 23:20
Actually, not only have I been reading on history of science since I was eight or nine but I also had a mandatory one-semester course on history of science later in college. Whether or not scientific method is fully attributable to the so-called "Islamic Golden Age" is debatable. They certainly didn't use it universally, and likewise, the notion had to develop into what we use today. ("Modern" is kind of a weasel word anyway; especially in history, you have to be careful with it given how it's commonly used for post-1500 kind of stuff). Likewise, "strong scientific pedigree of Muslims" is also a problematic claim given how it's religion is not something you inherit with a pedigree. The largest Muslim country is Indonesia while the period you're probably referring to involved Near and Middle Eastern Arabs and Persians (in fact, often even non-Muslim Jews). How does accepting a religion give you a "scientific pedigree" just because a completely different nation in the past that had some scientists also happened to follow that faith?
Ezekiel 23:20
What period are you referring to? Post-World War II?
Ezekiel 23:20
Which THEY produced.