Fedora 25 Alpha Linux Distro Now Available (betanews.com)
An anonymous reader writes: Today, Fedora 25 Alpha sees a release. While the pre-release distribution is not ready for end users, it does give testers an early start at poking around.
Keep in mind what an Alpha release is folks -- this is pre-Beta. In other words, it is littered with bugs, and you should definitely not run it on a production machine. There are already some show-stopping known issues -- a couple are related to dual-booting with Windows (scary). One bug can destroy OS X data when dual-booting on a Mac!
Keep in mind what an Alpha release is folks -- this is pre-Beta. In other words, it is littered with bugs, and you should definitely not run it on a production machine. There are already some show-stopping known issues -- a couple are related to dual-booting with Windows (scary). One bug can destroy OS X data when dual-booting on a Mac!
Isn't that architecture dead by now?
Firefox is already up to version 48.
thats not a bug, that punishment...
...no wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.
We need Fedora 25 for the DEC Alpha!
How is a distro being in the alpha stage of its development news? It would be news when it was close to release, or actually released. Until then, people would be happily using Fedora 24. This is not like a new OS that's surfacing in the market
Keep in mind what an Alpha release is folks -- this is pre-Beta. In other words, it is littered with bugs, and you should definitely not run it on a production machine.
If you need alpha release explained to you, you should probably just go back to the politics section.
Unless the news was "careful if you dual boot with Win or, especially OS X, DON'T install the latest Fedora Alpha", this should not be here. I can see how a release of a major Linux distribution might be considered news, although Fedora alone has 2 releases per year, so we have to be a bit limited in how we define "major" distros, otherwise slashdot would be just a Linux distro release listing. But posting an alpha release, of the aforementioned 6-month release cycle is way too much! Unless, as I said, it was for the warning, because data loss is a bit too much even for an alpha (we are not talking about a brand new OS here).
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
where can I find a DEC Alpha workstation these days?
Welcome, Wayland! We've needed you for about twenty years now!
201... uhh, 2017, year of the Linux desktop! Linux, uh, finds a way!
So, Red Hat enterprise server 8 alpha is released!
Every new version of Fedora shows more and more functionality removed.
WHY, pray tell, have removed advanced DNS settings from NetworkManager GUI? Why has the Boxes GUI lost almost half of configurable options?
Fedora: The Dumbed Down Segfault Distro Alpha for RHEL
"distribution is not ready for end users, it does give testers an early start at poking around. .... it is littered with bugs, and you should definitely not run it on a production machine. "
Isnt that what all Fedora releases are?
Without timothy in my exclusions list, looks like I gotta check off manishs. This is the twelfth betanews.com submission from Manish this month.
Kinda liked fedora 4 though