Slashdot Mirror


British Airways Passengers Delayed By Computer Glitch (bbc.com)

Reader rastos1 writes: British Airways told customers that some flights were cancelled on Monday "due to operational reasons." The airline apologized to customers, saying its IT teams were "working to resolve this issue". [...] a professional poker player from London, told the BBC she had queued for a flight in Las Vegas for two and a half hours. "My boarding pass was filled out by hand. Even had a hand-written hand baggage label. Staff were updating us well; The staff... were excellent. The pilot said the delays were due to a computer glitch and apologized profusely."This comes less than a month after Delta Air Lines and Vienna Airport both had their services disrupted due to computer glitches.

58 comments

  1. Slow news day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Had a friend flying BA with Gatwick today. Was slightly slower than usual apparently. It seems pen and paper isn't such a bad substitute.

  2. "Computer glitch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So is this going to be another "computer glitch" where the "computer glitch" was actually an electrical fire caused by power equipment? Everyone is quick to blame computers.

    1. Re:"Computer glitch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd be surprised how quick the airlines would be to AVOID admitting computer problems in this case.

      Any other company would be blaming this on a hacker or group of hackers, attempting to disrupt a vital service and damage the economy in some sort of nebulous concept of "terrorism." The airlines, on the other hand? It's literally their business to make people feel safe, even when they're not (you'll notice that all of this child groping and delays courtesy of the TSA haven't stopped any drugs from being shipped by airmail, for example). If it were successfully demonstrated that the computers of the major airlines are no more secure than anyone else's (which they aren't), the public might have even less confidence in their assurances of "safety" than they already have.

      Hence, "computer glitch." Or to put it another way, "we pinky swear we didn't just get DDoS'ed out of business, nobody broke in and got access to any traveler information. That information is expressly sold to the highest GOVERNMENT bidders ONLY!"

    2. Re:"Computer glitch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to work with a programmer who's night job was writing software for airlines. Never knew the application. But the guy was a total idiot. Worst programmer I ever worked with.

      Every time one of these outages happen, I know why.

      It was him.

    3. Re:"Computer glitch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, this is definitely a computer glitch. They can't keep their new "Fly" system online. It's been down several times this summer. You get what you pay for: It was written by TCS.

    4. Re:"Computer glitch" by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      It's like living in the 70's again. My only reason for living is that the 80's were pretty good.

    5. Re:"Computer glitch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, good thing somebody is being modded up for saying partially the same thing, though I still think it also has something to do with delayed background checking. But that's all just a wacko "conspiracy theory", right? The moderators certainly think so...

    6. Re:"Computer glitch" by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      You might be surprised to learn that people managed to get on airplanes before computers existed, and that they used to run entire airlines without a computer or an internet.

              The point being that by using centralized control via computer, you create single point failures or at least are vulnerable to single point issues that cripple the entire system, or at least slow it down. If they did it all with typewriters and ink pens, they wouldn't have a single point failure (power interruption) that inconvenienced a lot of people.

    7. Re:"Computer glitch" by Solandri · · Score: 1

      It's the standard Press trope of hyping up a story by trying to make it sound like the smallest possible factor was responsible for all the huge consequences. (There's a word for this in other languages, but not in English. Basically the sense of unfairness you get when the consequences just do not "fit" the precipitating action.)

      If we could backtrack far enough in chaos theory, the Press would go nuts with stories about how a butterfly flapping its wing in Texas wiped out the Eastern Seaboard with a hurricane. (Well, maybe not since that might get the public to start asking for a butterfly extermination program.)

    8. Re:"Computer glitch" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's really surprised. Some of us even remember these companies. Pan Am, TWA, Eastern. They all went out of business beçause hey couldn't make the switch to treating their passengers like expendable garbage.

    9. Re:"Computer glitch" by Maritz · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet you can check in a lot more people per unit time with computers and databases than you can with pen and paper. That's why we have it in the first place. Who cares that you 'used' to be able to do it without that? Yeah, big whoop. It was slow.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  3. Re:These aren't "glitches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If what you say is true, I'd rather be sitting at the gate then in the plane on the tarmac for hours! Seems like the problem was handled very well.

  4. KEEP CALM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And fly British Airways.

    1. Re:KEEP CALM by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      And fly British Airways.

      No thank you. I've done enough of that. They're full of pissy little rules.
      China Southern surprised me recently with how good they were.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
    2. Re:KEEP CALM by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      we all know the reason for the delays was that there were leaves on the tracks.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    3. Re:KEEP CALM by Plammox · · Score: 1

      Plus, BA cabin crews don't give a shit about economy travelers in spite of the "ask us anything to make your flight better"-promise.

    4. Re:KEEP CALM by mrbester · · Score: 2

      One of their pissy little rules is you can take two (yes, 2!) items of hand luggage per person into the cabin like you always used to before the shitty low cost airlines came along and dictated you can only take one and thus have to cram a camera case into your "I'll keep this with me as it has essentials should my baggage get lost" undersized bag. Undersized because they shrank the maximum dimensions with zero publicity so you only found out you've had to pay extra to put your flight bag in the hold when you check in.

      I'd fly BA any day over the likes of EasyJet. You get a snack even on a short flight, like Gatwick to Schiphol, the seats are more comfortable with somehow enough leg room even though there's the same number as a budget airline, the weight maximum for hold baggage is higher and the cabin crew go through one of the most rigourous selection procedures in the world.

      Or I could save fifteen quid and get nickel and dime'd by the Big Lemon bus companies of the sky.

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    5. Re:KEEP CALM by Plammox · · Score: 1

      For traveling within Europe, the difference between the shitty "old" airlines and the shitty discount airlines is not worth talking about. It really is on long haul you feel the service mindedness or lack thereof. Hate to say it, but in my experience Lufthansa provides the least shitty long haul economy service among the European carriers.

    6. Re:KEEP CALM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No thank you. I've done enough of that. They're full of pissy little rules.

      Are they as bad as Southwest, who will kick you off the plane for wearing a turban, speaking your native language, or wearing a tank top?

    7. Re:KEEP CALM by TechyImmigrant · · Score: 1

      > No thank you. I've done enough of that. They're full of pissy little rules.

      Are they as bad as Southwest, who will kick you off the plane for wearing a turban, speaking your native language, or wearing a tank top?

      Hard to say. I don't wear a turban and you catch me dead in a tank top.

      My experience of Southwest is mostly to take a quick jaunt to Vegas. So the lack of service doesn't impinge much.

      For long hauls flights, on Canada Air, United, American Airlines, Iceland Air, China Southern, Delta, British Airways and Lufhansa, CS is winning hands down. Iceland comes second. Canada Air is at the bottom followed closely by BA.

      --
      I should use this sig to advertise my book ISBN-13 : 978-1501515132.
  5. I'm not saying it's the Russians, but... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

    it's the Russians.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:I'm not saying it's the Russians, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm virtually certain Hillary's campaign people are already drafting a statement to that effect

    2. Re:I'm not saying it's the Russians, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the authorities...

      Sorry for the AC post, but somebody has an "interest"...

    3. Re:I'm not saying it's the Russians, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's your answer for everything.

    4. Re:I'm not saying it's the Russians, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In related news, Trump has put out a statement asking the Russians to hack Aeromexico

  6. Re:These aren't "glitches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the preferred way...

    Evidently I struck a nerve. So I guess I'll have to post AC on the matter from here on out... *sigh*

  7. Slowest news day...evar? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Er...two hour flight delays are now Slashdot-worthy? Let me tell you about every other trip I've taken through Chicago then.

    1. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Vueling are shite. I was so late with them last time I flew I waved at myself coming back.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      But it wasn't a "computer glitch".
      If you want to have your trip featured on Slashdot, you should put a 3D printed gun in your hand luggage and pay for your ticket in Bitcoin.

    3. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Let me tell you about every other trip I've taken through Chicago then.

      As if I wasn't dreading my business trip to Chicago next week already, we have this. Why do I get the feeling I'm just going to land, get kicked in the balls by a TSA agent while shouting Welcome to America, have all my stuff stolen and then end up dying of old age in some queue.

      Honestly this is the first time I'm going to a country I've not been to and not actually looked forward to it.

    4. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by ausekilis · · Score: 1

      two-hour delays are certainly newsworthy for someone who has never flown American Airlines. From my own personal data of personal and business flights with AA (fitting name), I'd say they have a roughly 15% "on-time" rate, and a greater than 50% "off by 2 or more hours" rate.

      For American the news would be that they only had 2 hour flight delays due to a computer glitch. Maybe British Airways is working on changing expectations.

      "We're sorry, an unexpected computer glitch caused our flights to be only 2 hours late. We are working on a fix to get us back to our normally 3-8 our delayed operations"

    5. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The impressive thing is that they had standby manual systems. That's why this dropped down to a 'two hour delay with handwritten boarding passes" instead of "complete stop of all BA flights for over twelve hours".

      I remember my boss talking about checking in with Singapore Air and the staff were doing things manually. Not because the computers were down, but so they were practiced in doing it manually for WHEN the computers are down.

      Or, the fire service here in NZ, where on Sundays (lowest demand) they switch to manual running so they are practiced in doing this IF there is a systemwide outage.

    6. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...dying of old age in some queue.

      The prisons are overcrowded. The queue is the new modern form of detainment. Pack a lunch, a folding chair (or maybe demand an airport wheelchair) and wear a diaper. Can't even go take a leak, get a drink, or sit down anywhere, or you lose your place. I am so bummed out that there is no resistance. On election day 98% of the electorate will vote for more of the same, if not worse.

      I have to post AC because the mods will nick my account for spilling the beans.

    7. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Er...two hour flight delays are now Slashdot-worthy? Let me tell you about every other trip I've taken through Chicago then.

      Well you see, airlines that are in other parts of the world are typically well organised, this means things like delays are rear events and that makes them newsworthy.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      I once just stood in line for 9 hours with British Airways (still another 12 to get on a plane). If they get me home on the correct day I declare victory.

    9. Re:Slowest news day...evar? by radarskiy · · Score: 1

      These are outstations for flag airlines that have few or even one hub airport.

      From LAS, BA only flies to LHR. Depending on which Swiss city was referenced, GVA only connects with LHR and LGW, and ZRH only connects with LHR and LCY. All they have to do is get you on any plane and let the hub operation sort the rest out.

  8. Ah computers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Doesn't it kill you when computers are blamed for problems or are given credit for infallibility?

    Here we have a case of computers being blamed for the incompetence of people. Because let's face it, someone somewhere screwed up to cause this problem.

    And then there is when you see a mistake or problem and you here, "the computer figured it out!", implying that you need to STFU - like whoever programmed it is infallible or whoever was entering the data is infallible.

    When I'm in a snarky mood, I'll make something up like, 'Ah, I see! The finance program is using the Turing floating point method and that's why it's charging an extra $12 a month."

    "Yes, exactly!"

    Salespeople and customer service people! You gotta just laugh at them.

  9. Computer glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Goddamn leavers. It's all their fault.

  10. Re:These aren't "glitches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully, the glitch does not provide time a window with less background checks for the passengers.

  11. Real reason for the delay by sciengin · · Score: 0

    The delay was because 9 terrorists from Black-Lives-Matter entered the runaway illegally and chained themselves there to impede their removal.
    Coinicdentally at the same time a computer glitch occured.

    1. Re:Real reason for the delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #KlingonLivesMatter https://cdn.meme.am/instances/...

    2. Re:Real reason for the delay by bernywork · · Score: 1

      Why would people on a runway at London City affect computers at Gatwick or Heathrow airport?

      [citation needed]

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    3. Re:Real reason for the delay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else already asked about Gatwick / Heathrow vs London City, so I'll just ask how a BLM action today caused delayed flights yesterday. How did it, Mr caricature of the bitter white male?

  12. Human errors really by sjbe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So is this going to be another "computer glitch" where the "computer glitch" was actually an electrical fire caused by power equipment? Everyone is quick to blame computers.

    Kind of a pet peeve of mine. For all practical purposes there is no such thing as a "computer error". Computers are machines that do exactly what they were designed and instructed to do. Nearly everything we casually refer to as a "computer glitch" is really a human error once you dig through the abstraction layers. It might be a bad bit of code or a poorly designed piece of hardware or inadequately spec'ed equipment or failure to account for (possibly severe) environmental factors or inadequate data redundancy but at the end of the day these are ALL human errors in reality. We built the machines and told them what to do so if the machines don't function as expected that is at some level the fault of a human.

    The computer just provides a convenient way to hide the person actually responsible for the mistake. But it is a human mistake somewhere along the line in all but a hand full of cases.

    1. Re:Human errors really by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nearly everything we casually refer to as a "computer glitch" is really a human error once you dig through the abstraction layers.

      Personally I blame the monkeys. If they weren't so damn keen to evolve into people we would never have had this problem.

    2. Re:Human errors really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bad, I left a GOSUB in where it shouldn't have been.

      My Applesoft Basic skills may be a little out of date.

    3. Re:Human errors really by mjwx · · Score: 1

      So is this going to be another "computer glitch" where the "computer glitch" was actually an electrical fire caused by power equipment? Everyone is quick to blame computers.

      Kind of a pet peeve of mine. For all practical purposes there is no such thing as a "computer error". Computers are machines that do exactly what they were designed and instructed to do. Nearly everything we casually refer to as a "computer glitch" is really a human error once you dig through the abstraction layers. It might be a bad bit of code or a poorly designed piece of hardware or inadequately spec'ed equipment or failure to account for (possibly severe) environmental factors or inadequate data redundancy but at the end of the day these are ALL human errors in reality. We built the machines and told them what to do so if the machines don't function as expected that is at some level the fault of a human.

      The computer just provides a convenient way to hide the person actually responsible for the mistake. But it is a human mistake somewhere along the line in all but a hand full of cases.

      In a perfect world then we could trace back every event back to the human that caused it though action or inaction and have them spanked appropriately. But we dont live in a perfect world.

      In the real world, complex systems behave unexpectedly and often in ways difficult to predict until they occur. This is why we call them "glitches" when we talk about computers. Even technically perfect code or hardware operated exactly as it should be can behave unexpectedly simply because the system is too complex to be able to calculate every single variable under every single circumstance. A design decision to have a 28 character maximum on a name field can cause a failure when a 29 character name is entered. An American designed system will behave badly when given ROTW style dates.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  13. Canadians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Canadians also apologized profusely.

  14. TCS strikes again by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    BA just got done offshoring a lot of their IT operations to Tata, and from what I've been reading, TCS wrote the new software that's causing the issues. I'll give them benefit of the doubt and assume the software at least works. What I assume is happening is what is happening in IT departments all over the place. Offshore Vendor X delivers software with barely adequate documentation to a skeleton crew onshore group that has to try to make it work. And yes, I have relevant experience -- airline IT is one of those fields that you have to develop a lot of domain knowledge to even understand what's going on.

    I have seen this in many different industries...they try to offshore something core to their business to a group of random Java programmers who have no clue what it is they're writing or what business process they're supporting. And because these offshore guys operate a revolving-door employment operation, anyone who actually does learn what's going on quickly leaves or becomes a manager -- thus starting the process again with a fresh new grad.

    Until companies realize they save money in the long run by carefully managing a directly-engaged, fully involved workforce this will keep happening. You can't keep dead wood around forever, but some of the operations I've seen lately have basically been chopping down the tree and setting it on fire.

    1. Re:TCS strikes again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any outsourcing service provider is interested in making big bucks (for the shareholders). The employers become either zombies, in it for the ride or just become manager of zombies. The sticker price what the clients BA get is the short term cost. The outsourcing companies have a motivation to expand the scope, gold plating and milking clients. There are no checks and balances for the quality of the code. Pretty soon you have patches and band aids and bubble gums all over the place. Then comes the modernization initiative. You cant imagine how many modernization initiatives I have seen in my 30 year career which, some how, asymptotically becomes the legacy systems in performance and throughput. It is a sort of scam.

  15. Computer control makes air travel viable by sjbe · · Score: 1

    You might be surprised to learn that people managed to get on airplanes before computers existed, and that they used to run entire airlines without a computer or an internet.

    Nobody has gotten on a commercial passenger airplane without computers being involved in decades. Yes they did used to run substantially smaller airlines without computers but given the scale of modern air travel that would be hugely inefficient and costly, not to mention even more error prone than it already is.

    If they did it all with typewriters and ink pens, they wouldn't have a single point failure (power interruption) that inconvenienced a lot of people.

    Power interruption is still a thing with pens and typewriters unless you don't care about being able to see what you are doing or operate the airport terminal. But never mind that, the loss of the ability to communicate data would be crippling. Good luck communicating flight schedules, passenger and cargo manifests, purchase orders, ticketing and boarding passes, accounting, and much more without hiring an army of support staff. Air travel would immediately become uneconomical for all but the wealthiest of people.

  16. I'm not complaining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My boss is currently stuck in England - we was not able to make his return flight to the USA due to all this.

    No complaints here. :)

  17. Fool me once, shame on me. Third time? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Yeah, sure, "glitch".

    Try, intentional hack.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  18. Re:These aren't "glitches" by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    You are correct.

    But they won't admit it.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  19. Re:These aren't "glitches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    :-) Somebody let the mods know. They want to cover it up also.

    Posting AC so they don't nick me for this one also. There's a strong appeal to authority going on here. You don't dare contradict the Official Narrative without getting tagged.

    - fusta

  20. Tata Consultancy Services - experience certainty by khz6955 · · Score: 1

    "Enhance your customer experience, generate new revenue opportunities, achieve higher efficiency and stay ahead of competition with our innovative airlines IT solutions." ref

  21. Black Lives Matter Activists Shut Down London City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democracy Now! exposes this lie. Search for "Black Lives Matter Activists Shut Down London City" [Airport] at http://www.democracynow.org/2016/9/6/headlines