Slashdot Mirror
Despite Its Nefarious Reputation, New Report Finds Majority of Activity On Dark Web is Totally Legal and Mundane (digitaljournal.com)
According to a study published by dark web data intelligence provider Terbium Labs, the bulk of activity appearing on the dark web is much like the content and commerce found on the clear web. In fact, researchers found that nearly 55 percent of dark web content is legal. From a report:"What we've found is that the dark web isn't quite as dark as you may have thought," said Emily Wilson, Director of Analysis at Terbium Labs. "The vast majority of dark web research to date has focused on illegal activity while overlooking the existence of legal content. We wanted to take a complete view of the dark web to determine its true nature and to offer readers of this report a holistic view of dark web activity -- both good and bad." Key findings from the report are (condensed): Anonymity does not mean criminality. Pornography is prominent, but not all of it is illegal. Drugs are a popular topic, with 45 percent of illegal content being about drugs.
Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's dangerous.
I understand "illegal content" in the context of pornography; we have CP laws. But what about "illegal content about drugs"?
A number of drugs are illegal, but is information about them also illegal?
This depends on what country's laws you use to compare it. A long time ago I saw a screenshot of an alleged dark web index type thing and a lot of the site descriptions were like survival instructions in case of a government martial law type situation and bomb-making instructions. Neither of those are technically illegal in the US I think but they would be in a ton of other countries. A lot of stuff appeared to be very borderline but then again it wasn't an extensive list.
Knowing how Freenet works, and that you can only see the content if you are given a USK or other key, I have to question the accuracy of their analysis. Perhaps they simply used Tor to browse the encrypted/anon web, but that is pretty far from the assertion of having analyzed the dark web... The dark web is dark because you ( and automated tools) can't see it.
The summary damns the darknet with faint praise that a little over half of the content isn't illegal. If a full 45% of the people walking down a particular street were there to buy drugs or hire a prostitute or fence some stolen goods you can bet the cops would know that street well. That's a staggeringly high level of crime.
I read the internet for the articles.
So, the dark web isn't that bad then; it just has a PR problem.
I would suggest changing it's name first. It's amazing how much more goodwiil people will grant you if you're called something like "the warm and fluffy" web instead of the dark web.
"That's the way to do it" - Punch
I suspect most of the "dark web"'s reputation (including it's nefarious-sounding name) is mostly made up by the media, themselves controlled by the states, to prevent honest people who would legitimately like to escape state and big data surveillance. Most honest people fear being caught doing something that has a dodgy reputation, even if it's perfectly legal.
Maintaining the myth that the "dark web" is strictly for pedophiles, drug dealers, paid hitmen, carders and other illegal activities keeps good people from going under the radar, That suits a whole bunch of genuinely nefarious internet actors just fine. It also suits law enforcement agencies, as the myth tends to isolate and concentrate truly nasty activities on the dark web - making the myth self-perpetuating - and it kills any desire for legit concerns to invest in anonymous internet accessibility. Just look at what happened to DuckDuckGo's or Soylentnews' TOR nodes: they've disappeared, because they didn't get enough traffic.
"A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
When around half your content is illegal it strikes me that you have earned the name dark web. Is this result really surprising? I would have assumed the innocuous content would be higher than 55%.
20% of the dark web is concerned with drug dealing. I can think of an easy way to make only 33% of the dark web content illegal.
Of the hundred people in attendance in this rooms the majority is not a homicidal cannibal stalker, we found 51% of those in attendance have no plans to murder and eat someone once they leave the building.
Most activity anywhere is legal and mundane. It's only the very tiny fraction of activity that is bad, which unfortunately gets all the press and makes it look like certain areas are worse than others. If the news reported on everything good, legal and mundane that happened, they'd have no room to report on 99% of the "bad" stuff that happens. Instead they like to use 99% of their time and resources focusing on 1% of the population's activities.
What even is "the dark web"? Is it just websites people don't know about because they aren't Facebook or Google?
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
This is why I hide my illegal content using steganography in otherwise legal content. It's secure because no one is willing to sit through enough furry porn to find it.
I fully agree with your dismissal of their results due to flawed methodology.
It's kind of like the old saying, "No living person has ever seen a ninja." No shit. If you did, you're dead. Or if you're alive, then what you saw wasn't a real ninja.
$5 / month hosted VPS on linux = awesome!
So 93% is illegal? The 7% is probably accidental then, or foreplay.
Table-ized A.I.
So? I have plans to murder and eat someone after reading this thread. I'll even publish them in the open!
Step 1: Read this thread,
Step 2: Murder someone,
Step 3: Eat them.
Step 4: There is no Step 4!
Reminded me of this incident. . . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
La courbe des naissances repart à la hausse en Suisse depuis 2003, alors qu’elle diminuait depuis la fin du XIXe siècle. On est pourtant loin d’un nouveau baby-boom. Cette augmentation est liée aux flux migratoires qui métissent la société helvétiqueLa courbe des naissances remonte en Suisse depuis 2003, quand 71000 naissances étaient enregistrées contre quelque 86000 en 2015. L’indice conjoncturel de fécondité, c’est-à-dire le nombre d’enfants par femme en âge de procréer, était de 1,22 en 2001 chez les Suissesses mais de 1,43 en 2015. Une progression qui s’explique par les naturalisations, selon Philippe Wanner, professeur à l’Institut de démographie air max Pas Cher et socioéconomie de l’Université de Genève.
No matter what it is they are doing even grocery shopping.
The problem is that any US state task force with federal funding or federal case now has the budget per case to track users ip's.
Been on the dark web is as now as safe as using your own ip and isp.
Anything left is a honey pot, bait, a trap or has been turned long ago and is now a gov run front to collect with.
Every file is has a checksum. Every checksum is tracked on download and upload. New files get a checksum. Facial recognition and any camera details left in a file are extracted and sorted. Every file linked back to a real ip.
The interesting groups are now invite only and in back the real world. Its back to 1900-1980's with clusters of crime interlinked by trusted real people.
Spending time exposed to some vast digital trap is a risk that is well understood.
Think of what the internet once was, chatrooms without SJW and approved social media. Users are looking to rediscover the freedom and fun of the net around the 1980's - 1990's.
Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
ESPECIALLY Pikoro who runs from a challenge & likes DNS but creates NOTHING OF VALUE https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... hiding behind his FAKE NAME ONLINE since he's a do nothing "ne'er-do-well"!
OR
Are you Falcone'er-do-well (hahaha) caught lying about me who I humilated for it yesterday https://science.slashdot.org/c...
or
1 of many trolls I utterly crushed later yesterday https://tech.slashdot.org/comm... and now your off-topic talk behind MY back bitch tactics of yours are down moderated for what they are troll.
I show how weak dns is in security issues and resource consumption in 100's of examples https://news.slashdot.org/comm...
APK
P.S.=> Since hosts do what dns does for less with less problems and hosts are easily migrated to PC endpoints on a network... apk
See subject: I always get the last laugh so keep blowing those "downmod points" - I'll post again & exhaust you of them.
* :)
(You're the picture of insanity - trying the SAME bullshit over & over expecting to get different results...)
APK
P.S.=> LOL @ U... apk