Slashdot Mirror


The Next iPhone Will Feature An OLED Display, Says Bloomberg (bloomberg.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Bloomberg: Apple Inc. has big plans to outfit its next iPhone with vibrant, energy-sipping organic LED displays, seeking to entice consumers with new technology that's already been embraced by other high-end smartphone makers. The trouble is that the four main suppliers for such components won't have enough production capacity to make screens for all new iPhones next year, with constraints continuing into 2018, people familiar with the matter said, presenting a potential challenge for the Cupertino, California-based company. OLED screens are more difficult to produce, putting Apple at the mercy of suppliers that are still working to manufacture the displays in mass quantities, the people said. The four largest producers are Samsung Display Co., LG Display Co., Sharp Corp., and Japan Display Inc. While Samsung is on track to be the sole supplier for the new displays next year, the South Korean company may not be able to make enough due to low yield rates combined with increasing iPhone demand. The supply constraints may force Apple to use OLED in just one version of the next-generation iPhone, push back adoption of the technology or cause other snags. Apple plans to ship at least one new iPhone with an OLED screen next year, the 10th anniversary of the smartphone's debut, people with knowledge of the matter said. A pair of other new iPhone models will likely feature screens that use older LCD technology, partly because there won't be enough OLED displays to satisfy anticipated demand, according to KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. The OLED iPhone, at least, will have a new look that extends glass from the display to the device's back and edges, according to a person familiar with Apple's plans. This all-glass design will have a virtual Home button embedded in an edge-to-edge screen, rather than a physical button that can be pressed, the person added.

67 comments

  1. iPhone = elections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We have to hear about the next one a year or two in advance, all the damn time.

  2. i want this article is good but in not by elkhou · · Score: 0

    in the article you have a good word but this articl not bad i have a now site i post goood article but not copyright post http://word-of-informatique.bl...

  3. People are still buying overpriced toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the real headline.

    1. Re:People are still buying overpriced toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the headline is people are going to buy overpriced toys, next year too.

  4. The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will this allow them to make the phone thinner?

    I love my iPhone 7, but the battery still lasts too long, and there's still too many goddam ports and buttons on the thing. I wish Apple would come out with a thinner phone that had half the battery capacity, no Lightning port, and a completely sealed and smooth chassis. Extra points for making it so thin there's no practical way I could ever put it in my pocket and sit down without breaking it. They're almost there with the 6 and 7, but not quite. I hate having any semblance of durability on my premium hardware. The phone should never last longer than the warranty, otherwise there's no reason for me to go out and buy new shiny hardware every 3 years.

    1. Re:The real question is... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 5, Funny

      You know, I was totally with you until your last sentence. Then I realized you're just a hater and poser. No REAL Apple-lyte (Praise Be Unto Jobs' Name) would wait for the warranty to expire! The ONLY reason you need a new phone is because it is THE NEW MODEL. Waiting any longer than you possibly must is simply ludicrous. I mean, if your wife was having a baby I can understand not getting in line just 3 days early rather than the usual 7. But holding off for 3 years? That's just something no self-respecting Apple-lyte would do!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I mean, if your wife was having a baby I can understand not getting in line just 3 days early rather than the usual 7.

      What are you talking about? She should be in line with you. When her water breaks, just ask Siri how to deliver the child.

    3. Re:The real question is... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Making it thinner isn't really an issue, but making it thinner and last the warranty period is. Damn the EU and their unrealistic demand that consumer electronics have to last at least 6 months!

      But I am fairly sure Apple will make a bold move forwards and expect (rightfully) that people will not try to go through the hassle of having their 4+ month old ancient device repaired but instead buy the new model.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually setting up an old and fat Macbook (not the 2016 one, the 2006 one). Hardcore Apple fans may laugh, but it's still thin enough to chuck into my backpack at just an inch, and light enough to carry without breaking my back (if you're complaining that anything lighter than 20 pounds is too heavy to carry in a backpack or have on your lap, grow up. My pug weighs that much and she's on my lap all the time. Plus, it it's heavier, there's more space to cool it, and I would rather have a 2 inch 20 pound laptop that can take a few drops and is sorta fast than a thin one that's a little slow and will run hot enough to burn my legs after extended use. 20 pounds is heavier than average, but it's not painful).

    5. Re: The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptops haven't been 20 pounds for quite some time.

    6. Re: The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptops haven't been 20 pounds for quite some time.

      Did I say pounds? I meant 20 kilograms!

    7. Re: The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applyte?

    8. Re: The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Applyte?

      Obviously you didn't go to catholic school...

    9. Re:The real question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will this allow them to make the phone thinner?

      While you're clearly joking, the answer to that question is actually "yes".
      An LCD display needs a backlight, which usually consists of a plastic diffuser with LEDs either behind or at the sides.
      With OLEDs the pixels generate their own light, so no backlight is needed, making that part a bit thinner.
      It's only 0.5 to 2 mm, but maybe that's enough for Apple to merit the change.

  5. innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure people will be talking about yet another Apple innovation in the years to come.
    </sarcasm>

  6. LED vs LCD by markdavis · · Score: 1

    I have yet to use an LED display of any type. Have they improved over the last few years? Last I checked, the colors always looked way off when compared to an LCD and they seemed a bit more "pixely". Also, LED displays always seemed "brighter", but only until you go outside and then LCD seems much better.

    I am guessing LED is the future and will eventually replace LCD TV's and monitors as well as phones, it is just that the displays are starting small so phones get to be first.

    1. Re:LED vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The main problem with OLEDs is still that they age and that the colors age differently. Don't run your OLED at full blast. It will burn in. On the other hand, there really isn't an alternative if you want good black levels.

    2. Re:LED vs LCD by AMDinator · · Score: 1

      Assuming you mean OLED-

      I'm also curious for a different reason. The newest OLED display I've used was in a Lumia Icon and text was fuzzy around the edges compared to an older, lower-res phone with an LED backlit LCD display. My Nexus One had the same issue to a much larger extent.

      If they use a PenTile or derivative display on the next iPhone I will not consider purchasing one.

    3. Re:LED vs LCD by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      I have yet to use an LED display of any type. Have they improved over the last few years? Last I checked, the colors always looked way off when compared to an LCD and they seemed a bit more "pixely".

      Short answer is yes. Long answer is:

      The color reproduction of OLED was from the start far better than any LCD on the market, even with the early phones. The problem was that this was not compensated for with colour management resulting in hyper over saturated colours that looked horrible.

      The pixely problem was due to the use of a pentile pattern with early OLEDs. These were used partially because at the time they needed more space between pixels during manufacture and partially the red and blue pixels faded faster than the green ones so by making them larger they extended the life of the display. They aren't used anymore in high-end phones and with the resolutions these days pixels shouldn't register unless you start getting a good magnifying glass.

      I am guessing LED is the future and will eventually replace LCD TV's and monitors as well as phones, it is just that the displays are starting small so phones get to be first.

      It's an issue of lifetime more than anything. Phones and tablets have a much shorter life expectancy than TVs or monitors and a lower duty cycle compared to some always-on displays. There's still some things that need to be improved before the technology is ready for TVs or monitors, but personally I can't wait. The colour gamut of my phone is better than that of my $1600 LCD which is just depressing, but at the same time an exciting example of technological progression.

    4. Re:LED vs LCD by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      My phone is an OPX with OLED display. It looks amazing.

    5. Re:LED vs LCD by darkain · · Score: 2

      About color management: This is a two-fold problem. Both Google and Apple refuse to support *ANY* color management in their mobile OSes at all. Save an image in the AdobeRGB or ProPhoto RGB color space, view them in your web browser on the desktop and it'll properly translate the color information to what ever color space the desktop OS is running in. On the phones, they absolutely ignore all color-space information from the image, not even trying to convert it to sRGB. Checking bug reports online for both Android and iOS shows that both companies actively mark colorspace issues as "not fixing", as in, they actively acknowledge the issue and have done so for years, and are actively refusing to address it.

    6. Re:LED vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Samsung's displays are normally Pentile, not sure about the other manufacturer's however. But on my Galaxy S6 text is as crisp as can be, probably due to the ridiculously high resolution. So long as the pixels are small enough you won't notice whether it is Pentile or not.

      Also the brightness is excellent.

      I doubt Apple would use an AMOLED display unless it was better than what they are currently using.

    7. Re:LED vs LCD by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      That is not directly the problem. Yes it would be nice for the OS to naively support internal colour management algorithms but the ability for a display to display accurate colour does not depend on the OS being able to translate the colour (save for the example of not understanding the source material which is what you describe).

      Colour management baked into the OS is important if you have multiple display with multiple different output gamuts. It then becomes important for this to be a feature. *sidenote* Windows and Linux don't have this feature either. They provide APIs for colour management and they provide information to applications on what colour space to the monitor uses, but it relies entirely on the application to implement the colour management or call on the API to do it */sidenote*

      However a phone is not a desktop. The monitor is built in to the device and the OS is specifically written for it. It is therefore possible for the driver itself to simply re-map the RGB space (this is what Samsung do to make their displays look normal if you look under display options). This fixes the specific problem (I think) the GP was complaining about which is that colours looked unrealistic on an OLED display.

      What it doesn't do is allow you to display accurate normal colours and also display a wider colour gamut if that information is available at the same time. For that you are most definitely right, the OS needs some intelligence and as someone who surface the web with a wide gamut monitor and looks at the slashdot logo it is incredibly disappointing for me that it looks hypersaturated. The only browser currently supporting output colour space translation is Firefox, and I gave up on that.
      *another sidenote* Chrome used to support colour management completely but that died sometime around version 34. Now it only supports colour management for images with embedded profiles so on a website you can have an sRGB image and an sRGB image with an embedded profile for sRGB look different if your monitor isn't also sRGB */another sidenote*

      Developers just don't frigging get it.

    8. Re:LED vs LCD by Computershack · · Score: 1

      Don't run your OLED at full blast. It will burn in..

      Is it 2013 again?

      --
      I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams
    9. Re:LED vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like you can replace the flash storage or the battery in any Apple product. I doubt they care if the screen wears out after a year either.

    10. Re:LED vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About color management: This is a two-fold problem. Both Google and Apple refuse to support *ANY* color management in their mobile OSes at all.

      Post-truth is word of the year

    11. Re:LED vs LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. And... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a shit?!

  8. What about a news filter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope it comes with a news filter, so I don't get "fake" news stories by accident. I wouldn't want to get negative news from the "right party" and positive news from the "wrong party" which might influence my opinion about certain candidates.

  9. I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Rei · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah, it consumes less power, but it looks terrible. Starts out dimmer than LCD, gets dimmer with age, color balance starts feeling off subpar, gets terrible with age, always looks bad outdoors, burn-in prone, etc. It also feels like the colors "bleed" more in LED, although that could just be my perception. I know that blacks are supposed to be better with LED than LCD (and thus they get higher nominal contrast ratios), but in most viewing conditions the black difference is not something you notice, unless it's very dark. I once went around to my coworkers and compared my Z2 (LCD) to their cell phones of roughly the same age and resolution and there was no comparison, the Z2 looked way better.

    Maybe the technology has advanced significantly since then... but otherwise, no thank you.

    --
    Wingus, Dingus! Listen up!
    1. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that blacks are supposed to be better

      You lacist plick!

    2. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I have to wonder what kind of terrible OLED displays you have been looking at. Good OLED screens are light years ahead of LCD in display quality, most notably in viewing angle.

    3. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by aNonnyMouseCowered · · Score: 2

      Smart phone manufacturers know OLEDs don't age gracefully, forcing the buyer to upgrade to a shinier model just when the old phone has passed its warranty.

    4. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by sremick · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think it looks amazing. Every smartphone I've owned at this point has been an OLED screen and I can't go back to LCD. I definitely notice the blacks, and the more-vibrant colors (LCD looks very subdued and washed-out). A Pixar movie on OLED is something to behold.

      Nice to see Apple catching up to 2010.

    5. Re: I can't be the only one who hates OLED by johnsmithperson123 · · Score: 1

      OLED is pretty cool now. But the aging is still there. We all know the real reason Apple wants OLED- a new feature that conveniently dies within a few years, or looks awful anyway.

    6. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Rei · · Score: 1

      All I can say is, I did a direct side-by-side comparison. You say LCD looks washed out to you, I found LED to be dim, oversaturated and unbalanced - and the older the phone, the worse all of that becomes. I guess if you're watching Pixar movies where it's all about cartoony colors then I guess that's not a problem for you. I prefer realism.

      --
      Wingus, Dingus! Listen up!
    7. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by thegarbz · · Score: 0

      but it looks terrible.

      Matter of opinion incidentally going against testing.

      Starts out dimmer than LCD

      Depends on the design.

      gets dimmer with age

      By an irrelevant and almost immeasurable amount for something with the lifetime of a phone

      color balance starts feeling off subpar

      Which has nothing to do with the display which offers far superior colour performance to any LCD display on the market (measurable)

      gets terrible with age

      I'm beginning to wonder if it's just your eyes going bad.

      always looks bad outdoors

      Yeah it's definitely your eyes.

      burn-in prone, etc.

      Oh I get it now. Sorry it wasn't your eyes, it's that you're still using a Galaxy S1. Maybe it's time you upgraded to a phone with a more recent display. Burning hasn't been a detectable issue on phones for a good 4-5 years now.

      It also feels like the colors "bleed" more in LED, although that could just be my perception.

      On a device where each independent pixel emits at a specific wavelength, yes that's definitely your perception.

      I know that blacks are supposed to be better with LED than LCD (and thus they get higher nominal contrast ratios), but in most viewing conditions the black difference is not something you notice, unless it's very dark.

      Many people using their phone at night would disagree with you. Especially side by side with an LCD.

      I once went around to my coworkers and compared my Z2 (LCD) to their cell phones of roughly the same age and resolution and there was no comparison, the Z2 looked way better.

      Maybe the technology has advanced significantly since then... but otherwise, no thank you.

      Yeah I once compared a single product with another single product, and then wrote off an entire technology due to the results too. But then I realised how utterly stupid I was when it turned out that technology was actually far better as most people had said.

    8. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Gr8Apes · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, it consumes less power, but it looks terrible. Starts out dimmer than LCD, gets dimmer with age, color balance starts feeling off subpar, gets terrible with age, always looks bad outdoors, burn-in prone, etc.

      OLED, at least recent screens, are far superior to LCD in a number of areas, including brightness, color balance and gamut, and especially viewing in the dark and in bright light areas. If you move to TV technology, the worst tech in the last 40 years has been LCD screens. The motion blur, lack of color depth and lack of gradient abilities are what keep bothering the crap out of me, and that includes even the newest LCD based TVs.

      It also feels like the colors "bleed" more in LED, although that could just be my perception.

      Actually, that's the gradient effect, something highly desirable in a screen over the LCD square pixel edge to edge single color capability that gives rise to that aforementioned blockiness and color banding, which just don't exist in nature. A little color edge bleed between pixels allows for a natural gradient to occur, mimicking real life color gradients. This is, of course, discussing things like photos and movies. Note that most phone screens today have a high enough pixel density that unless your eyes are good, you won't notice any significant bleed unless its a defective screen. TVs, OTOH, are a different story.

      I once went around to my coworkers and compared my Z2 (LCD) to their cell phones of roughly the same age and resolution and there was no comparison, the Z2 looked way better

      I have no idea what a Z2 looks like, nor what phones you compared to, but a good LCD screen can look better than a crappy OLED screen. Quality of components matters and one well implemented technology can exceed an inherently better but poorly implemented technology. Quality OLED screens have only really started coming out in the last year or two, so aging is something that you could only start to really look at in the next couple of years, IMHO.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    9. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's racist prick, you roon.

    10. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      I use a desktop wireless charging stand for my Note 5 and an app called (IIRC) "desk clock".
      Due to the OLED display being totally pure black, I can set the desk clock to be ridiculously dim and not illuminate my entire bedroom, it really does look like a bedside desk clock, except it moves around to prevent screen damage.

      I believe OLED still has burn in, but it's getting better - the colours are ridiculously good and the blacks essentially perfect.

    11. Re:I can't be the only one who hates OLED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the OLED screens you've been looking at have been garbage?

      I am _still_ using an OLED 3G Nexus S. For pictures (moving or otherwise) that are mostly dark colors, the improved black levels kick the everloving shit out of any other non-OLED screen I've seen in anything other than full-to-mid-afternoon sunlight, even to this day.

      As to the first four sentences in your post, I have to stridently disagree with everything but the "burn-in prone" comment. (I once left the screen on for ~24 hours straight. Now I have a faint ghost of the Gingerbread notification bar (but not the icons on the bar) along the top of the screen. People don't notice it until I point it out, but _I_ see it.)

  10. Somehow by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    Somehow I think the manufacturers will be able to make enough displays for the iPhones when the time comes. It isn't like they need to dig them out of mines or something. Any manufacturer would kill to be a supplier for the iPhones.

    1. Re:Somehow by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 2

      This is an opportunity for American manufacturers to step up. Isn't anyone interested in being a domestic display supplier?

    2. Re:Somehow by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure.

      Step 1: Spend ludicrous amounts of money on manufacture.
      Step 2a: Buy all the required IP.
      Step 2b: Ignore IP laws and buy all the required lawyers.
      Step 3: ???
      Step 4: Chapter 11.

    3. Re:Somehow by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure.

      Step 1: Spend ludicrous amounts of money on manufacture.
      Step 2a: Buy all the required IP.
      Step 2b: Ignore IP laws and buy all the required lawyers.
      Step 3: ???
      Step 4: Chapter 11.

      Buy enough politicians and it will be profitable whether you go bankrupt or not.

  11. And in a courageous move... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the phone's display will not be backlit. An Apple spokesman stated, "Our phones' beauty can only be appreciated fully in natural sunlight. To improve our customers' experience we've removed the backlight so that they can enjoy the smooth, sleek thinness of their phones as Ives intended."

    1. Re:And in a courageous move... by AMDinator · · Score: 1

      Well, yes. OLED displays do indeed lack a backlight. That's the whole point.

    2. Re:And in a courageous move... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      At the same time our glasses will become an extra coating of shininess. Complaints that this turns the iPhone even more into an overpriced mirror than it already is were met with derisive comments about luddites not understanding the vision here.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. And it be healthful! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    so you know it gonna taste like arse!

  13. Welcome ro 2009 by ukoda · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You mean an OLED display like on the Nexus One back in 2009? What's next, wireless charging?

    1. Re:Welcome ro 2009 by ArtemaOne · · Score: 1

      2009? I had a OLED MP3 player by Creative back in like 2000, maybe 1999.

  14. In other news... by ClickOnThis · · Score: 0

    ...the next iPhone will not have an on-off button. Because courage.

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  15. Please God No by 2ms · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was thinking I might go iPhone next time, but partly because of how impressed I am with the iPhone 7 display! Why anyone would want an OLED on phone is beyond me. The colors look ridiculous. You can spot an OLED phone from a mile away from the psychedelic color rendition. Can't do it!

    1. Re:Please God No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking I might go to a mac next time, because of how impressed I am with their PowerPC chips. Why anyone would want x86 is beyond me.

      Wait, what? Macs are x86 IBM compatible clones now? PowerPC is dead. Long live x86.

      Also what's with this OLED? How can OLED possibly be superior to an LCD in every conceivable metric, when they're not even used in apple products. Stuff and nonsense. If I wanted a superior product for a lower price I'd buy a Samsung. . . but then I'd be a poverty stricken loser.

    2. Re:Please God No by Solandri · · Score: 4, Informative

      That has nothing to do with OLED. It can be addressed with a simple color profile; but unfortunately Google hasn't yet added color profile support to Android. Samsung has addressed it by hacking color profiles into the version of Android running on their phones. iOS does support color profiles, at least internally (it's how Apple makes their screens so color accurate).

      In a nutshell, OLED has completely black blacks, and has a wider color gamut than LED - it can display more saturated colors like in real life. The current TV and web standard for color gamut is sRGB, which unfortunately was a reduction in color gamut from the NTSC standard that was used for CRT TVs. Early LCDs were vastly inferior in color reproduction than CRTs, and manufacturers managed to get the sRGB color standard hobbled to compensate for this. So all images you see designed to sRGB can only display up to about 50% the color saturation of real-life. OLEDs easily cover the Adobe RGB color gamut, which is pretty close to the old NTSC gamut.

      When you display an sRGB image on a display which is capable of a wider gamut, it basically stretches the sRGB colors to map them onto the display's gamut. This is what leads to the lurid colors. The green which is supposed to be 50% of the deepest green you can see in real life (maximum green for sRGB) gets mapped to 70% of the deepest green you can see in real life, making it look unnaturally green. But if you calibrate the display with a color profile, the OS sees that the image it's trying to display is sRGB, and correctly maps it to the (roughly) lower 2/3rds of the color range the display is capable of, and the 50% green remains 50%. It's like how a stereo system which can output 200 Watts can also output 100 Watts. But to play music normalized for a 100 Watt stereo system, you have to turn down the volume on a 200 Watt system. Android currently doesn't have a standardized way to turn down the volume. (Meanwhile, the 100 Watt system can never output sound at 200 Watts.)

      With proper software support, there's basically no downside to OLED other than burn-in. Color shift and fade can be compensated for by profiling the screen again. Color professionals (photographers, graphics artists, videographers) do this with their own colorimeter they buy. But there's no reason phone stores couldn't have a colorimeter on hand. You could drop by the store once a year, they use their colorimeter to profile your phone in 10 minutes, and you're out the door with a new color profile and accurate colors. But the OS has to support custom color profiles to be able to do this. And the burn-in problem was more or less solved in the CRT days with screen savers. CRTs used phosphors which also suffered burn-in, and a screen saver evened out phosphor use enough to mitigate burn-in. (You younger folks have probably wondered why they're called a screen "saver" - now you know).

    3. Re:Please God No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will never go back to using screensavers on any device, be it a PC or a mobile phone. The fact that OLED is not stable makes it a joke for any serious use. So you can shove those organic LEDs straight up your arse.

  16. We're already excited for a new iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I get it, the iPhone 7's launch was boring. It doesn't do anything new unless you're a pro photographer or a someone who needs to access Slashdot twice as fast via the A10 processor, but come on! You just got a new phone! I have seen articles about this a week after the iPhone 7 launch. You just got a new phone that does everything the last one did (minus the headphone jack), meaning there's 2 reasons not to be excited for a new phone!
    1. You JUST got the new phone and should appreciate what you have - seriously, people like you may be the reason that Apple releases new gadgets that don't introduce anything new. They can't wait for a problem they can solve to arise because everyone's constantly pissing themselves over technologies and new gadgets that aren't worth an upgrade. You want a good phone worth $700? Keep your current phone (or PC, or generic shiny device) for a few years, then ugrade - all the new stuff will make a bigger splash because of how long you've been on old stuff, and it'll thus
                    a. Feel greater than buying the newest thing all the time because you're going from horse drawn carrige to sports car rather than nice car to sports car
                    b. Be cheaper because you won't be spending $700 every single year

    2. Apple just showed that they didn't change anything meaningful for the better, so how do you know the new phone will actually be an improvement over the 6S, which is still just as good for most people as the 7 (and maybe better because of the headphone jack).

    Conclusion: Quit urinating all over yourself over the next gadget. Ever read the book "If You Give A Mouse A Cookie"? If a 6 year old can figure it out, so can you.

  17. If you want OLED now... by matbury · · Score: 2

    ...buy a Samsung. Simple.

    1. Re:If you want OLED now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :)

  18. OLED or LCD sunshine doesnt care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they are all shit, a bit of sunlight and they are useless, where are all the transflective displays ?

    1. Re:OLED or LCD sunshine doesnt care by Megol · · Score: 1

      transflective screens are still LCDs...

    2. Re:OLED or LCD sunshine doesnt care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transreflective screens just aren't that good. The N900 had one, it was kinda cool to be able to turn the backlight off and use it in direct sunlight, but it didn't look great and was really only usable in direct sunlight, go in the shade and the screen was difficult to read without turning the backlight back on. Also when used reflectively the colours were all washed out, which is ok for reading text, but otherwise looked shit, I'd rather have a good quality regular screen.

      I imagine transreflective displays aren't used, because except for the edge case of reading text in direct sunlight, they aren't as good as regular LCD displays. Maybe they've improved since the days of the N900, but considering I never see them used in anything, I doubt it.

    3. Re:OLED or LCD sunshine doesnt care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a black and white one (perhaps black LCD "inkings" on light amber background), with a frontlight that's togglable like it's a Game Boy, or can be dimmed/brightened using an ambient light sensor.
      As for specs I wanna see something with a quad core Cortex A-35 and one chip of 2GB (16Gb) LPDDR4 if that makes sense?
      Well, forget about the transflective display, we won't ever get it. (what if some site or application uses a dark theme?)
      Cheap 4.5 inch OLED might do. E.g. I've enginesearched them and found a 4.3 inch 960x540 from some Chinese supplier, might be good enough? at least there are no angles of vision, like goddamn paper.

  19. Edge to edge touch screen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. I keep my iPhone 6S Plus in an otterbox defender because I don't want my $1,000 phone breaking if I drop it.
    The otterbox has raised edges to protect the screen but they make accessing the very edges of the screen a bit troublesome. No unusable but a bit of a bother.
    I just have to have patience when I need to touch things at the very edge of the screen.

    But if Apple is going to make the new iPhone with no bezel and push pixels to the very edge of the screen then an otterbox is not going to work anymore.
    To me that's a total deal breaker. And this talk about an all glass case? What the actual fuck?!! How stupid is that?!

    If they really do build such a phone then I will not be buying. I'll hang on to my 6S+ until they obsolete it (which they WILL)
    Or maybe they'll come out with a 7S+ which will not have have the bastard all glass case or the zero bezel system.

    As it is now I can't find any reason to dump my 6S+ for a 7+ but maybe they'll do a 7S+ and I might jump to that.

    All glass case? Deal breaker. Zero bezel ? Deal Breaker.

    Don't be stupid Apple.

  20. That is just part of the "planned obsolescence" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple products usually get very low repairability scores. Soldering the disk onto the computers mainboard, and subsequently having to replace both mainboard and disk when the on/off button fails is one aspect, or having non-user-replaceable batteries in a glued-down case another. Using OLEDs which are known to degrade relative quickly in comparison to other display technologies is the next step in turning an overpriced giimmic into problematic trash as fast as user protection laws allow. Or even faster. I can guarantee that the T&Cs the user agrees to when using his toy for the first time will cover their asses even if the display will be FUBARed within a few months of use.

    But hey, when one values a brands "coolness" over its qualities or ability to deliver, they deserve being reamed.

  21. Don't count your chickens before the eggs have hat by duallank · · Score: 1

    Just creating hypes , iPhone not sold this year as everyone expecting , won't sell much as well next year .