Slashdot Mirror
Spammers Compromised Popular Twitter Accounts Including Viacom And Microsoft Xbox (engadget.com)
"A number of popular Twitter accounts suddenly wanted to help you add more followers," joked Engadget. An anonymous reader writes:
Early Saturday morning, due to a breach of the Twitter Counter analytics service, the compromised Twitter accounts started posting images touting services that sell Twitter followers. The affected accounts include @PlayStation, @Viacom, @XboxSupport, @TheNewYorker, @TheNextWeb, and @Money (Time's finance magazine) as well as @NTSB (the National Transportation Safety Board) and @ICRC (the Red Cross), and the Twitter accounts of famous individuals include astronaut Leland Melvin, Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton, and actor Charlie Sheen. "We can confirm that our service has been hacked; allowing posts on behalf of our user," Twitter Counter posted Saturday, announcing minutes later that "hackers CANNOT post on our users' behalf anymore."
"Apologies for the spam, everyone," tweeted the account for Xbox support, adding "We're cleaning things up now."
"Apologies for the spam, everyone," tweeted the account for Xbox support, adding "We're cleaning things up now."
It's anudda Shoah, I tells ya! Anudda Shoah!
Twatter? News for turds stuff that splatters.
It's not exactly news that Twitter is in need of ways to wring more cash out of their operation; and it's not news that these sorts of compromises and temporarily having your precious brand mouthpiece go off the rails can make customers a bit jumpy, so why don't they offer some appropriately overpriced enhanced authentication setup for the relatively deep pocketed users?
You've got a variety of solid options(RSA fobs, FIDO tokens, PIVs, etc.) for authentication; and could also add some options for delegation/limited roles to suit accounts where multiple people are generating tweets; without just having everyone share credentials in an egregious breach of sensible practice.
It'd hardly be free to implement; but when dealing with customers who routinely buy things like TV advertising time, you could probably get away with charging a fairly decent price for it.
must be using that for-twats "service". Just get a fucking life already!
Not like it's going to be hard to figure out who's behind bestfollow.us, myfollowers.me, etc. What kind of fucking moron advertises by committing felonies?
Let's keep to during play, this about h4lf of the A BSD over other wasn't on Steve's my calling. Now ,I up my toys. I'm
I stopped posting on twitter when they started deleting anyone who opposed the left wing political correctness, everyone is a victim, agenda
Why would you go after a retired astronaut with the most "internet" astronaut picture ever?!
Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
I guess they needed to sell their fake-bot-follower services elsewhere.
Question mark in the Subject: because I want to cling to optimism, but I personally think it's too late now. Would it make you feel any better if I blamed Al Gore? You see, by just giving them the money to create the Internet, he helped them ignore the financial models. Now the resulting mess has become so huge that we're struggling to figure out the boundaries between abuse of our privacy by huge companies, abuse of our privacy by criminal hackers, and abuse of our privacy by criminal hackers in the names of the huge companies.
I think SMTP is a good example to start with. If some financial model had been built into the protocol, then the email spam problem might not have gotten out of hand. For example, imagine if the original email protocol had just tracked sending versus receiving between servers to support possible billing later on. With a wrinkle like that, you wouldn't even need to charge money to deter spammers. You could charge them in delay times penalizing servers that originate too much email. Have to keep the marginal cost away from zero... (Delusional as I am, I still think email could be saved, but it won't be because the big companies have decided that "Live and let spam" is cheaper.)
I confess that I don't really have much to say about Twitter. Spammers' natural heaven if ever there was one.
Wouldn't you prefer to make the spammers' lives hellacious?
Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
But, hey, at least, they got rid of the White Supremacists (or was it "far right", or "alt right"?) — selectively shutting people up is much more fun, than protecting account-security. That latter would be, you know, actually, doing their jobs.
In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.