Slashdot Mirror


Oracle Buys Dyn DNS Provider (techcrunch.com)

Oracle announced today it is buying DNS provider Dyn, a company that was in the press lately after it was hit by a large-scale DDoS attack in October that resulted in many popular websites becoming inaccessible. From a TechCrunch report:Oracle plans to add Dyn's DNS solution to its bigger cloud computing platform, which already sells/provides a variety of Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) and Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) products. Oracle and Dyn didn't disclose the price of the deal but we are trying to find out. Dan Primack reports that it's around $600 million. We've also asked for a comment from Oracle about Dyn's recent breach, and whether the wheels were set in motion for this deal before or after the Mirai botnet attack in October.

117 comments

  1. /. Headline 6 months from now by udachny · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expect lawsuits related to your free use of DNS. Now everybody who uses DNS owes Oracle 1 dollar per DNS lookup.

    1. Re: /. Headline 6 months from now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baby Boomers: hurry up a

  2. So right after their value gets depressed? by tlambert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So right after their value gets depressed?

    Not suspicious at all...

    1. Re: So right after their value gets depressed? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 2

      Why would their value get depressed? They didn't do anything wrong. I don't know why TFS calls it a breech even though nothing was breeched.

    2. Re:So right after their value gets depressed? by hsmith · · Score: 1

      You do realize M&A usually takes months, at times a year+ to complete? This was in the works long before the DDoS attack.

    3. Re:So right after their value gets depressed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think 600$ million for DNS services is low? I could understand paying 600$ for it, but 600 million seems like... I guess I'm just stupid and don't understand the market.

    4. Re:So right after their value gets depressed? by rekoil · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if there had been negotiations that had previously fallen apart over the price. After the DDoS caused Dyn's customers to flee in droves (my own employer included), suddenly Oracle's last best offer became much more appealing. Something very similar happened at a company I used to work for - we had been talking to a potential acquisition but we were still far apart on price. That company's largest customer files Chapter 11, and *bam* they called back and agreed to our last offer within days. Deal announced within a week of that filing.

    5. Re: So right after their value gets depressed? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      Why would their value get depressed? They didn't do anything wrong.

      Actually, they did. They hosted their primary and secondary DNS on the same groups of servers, all belonging to them.

      BCP is to host the primaries, and then do in-exchange-for-like hosting of other people's secondaries, while they host yours.

      That way, if someone attacks one of you, all your DNS services stay up, and the biggest annoyances are going to be your data bill at the end of the month, and the customers of the attacked party being unable to make changes to their DNS configuration data while the attack is ongoing.

    6. Re:So right after their value gets depressed? by tlambert · · Score: 1

      You think 600$ million for DNS services is low? I could understand paying 600$ for it, but 600 million seems like... I guess I'm just stupid and don't understand the market.

      You probably just don't understand valuation of a business for sale.

      You can value it on many factors (P/E ratio is one of them); however, the most common valuation mechanism is some scaling factor (usually 2-2.5X) of annual revenue.

      As soon as they were DDOS'ed, a lot of people simply abandoned them for other DNS providers, which dropped their expected revenue. Even if you didn't adjust the scaling factor downward, due to the demonstrated fragility of the business in the face of adverse events... that's going to drop the price you are willing to pay, because it's going to drop the expectation value for the ongoing revenue stream.

  3. CDOS? by swm · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Oracle buys a DNS provider, does that constitute a centralized denial-of-service attack?

    1. Re:CDOS? by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No but I do expect the quality of DNS to slip drastically as Oracle downgrade it to the same level as the rest of their products

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    2. Re:CDOS? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      No but I do expect the quality of DNS to slip drastically as Oracle downgrade it to the same level as the rest of their products

      Don't forget that down the line, if you're using an Oracle product, you're going to need to use the Oracle DNS service because that's the only one they support. DNS connection problems with your Oracle product? Yea, you're not using OracleDNS, so your whole stack is unsupported.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    3. Re:CDOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then a flying spaghetti monster jumps through the air yelling 'fabrication is fun'

  4. Looking for alternatives by BDeblier · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Dyn customer, who refuses to give even one lousy cent to Oracle, I'll be on the lookout for alternatives. Suggestions are welcome.

    1. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, I'm a customer but I WONT be an oracle customer

    2. Re:Looking for alternatives by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have a service through http://www.enom.com/hosting/dn... which seems to work fine for me.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    3. Re:Looking for alternatives by lactose99 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Been using https://www.zoneedit.com/ for years, although I'm on the cheaper end of the spectrum. Not sure how enterprise-y you need your DNS

      --
      Fully licensed blockchain psychiatrist
    4. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no-ip.com

      I'm sure there's some pros/cons, but I've never had an issue with it.

    5. Re:Looking for alternatives by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      Yep, me too. I used them originally for access to my home system. When I migrated to an external hosted site, I kept them. Time to hunt for a different solution.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    6. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thought exactly the same, the moment I read about the acquisition. I use Dyn for talking to my server at home while I'm mobile.
      Thankfully, my ISP provides me with a static IP and I can buy a domain to link to it.

    7. Re:Looking for alternatives by andydread · · Score: 1

      I use namecheap...works well

    8. Re:Looking for alternatives by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet the employees at Dyn are on the lookout for alternative employers. From Dyn's glassdoor page:

      "When we actually do take a break, you can find us talking about upcoming product features during a heated ping-pong game, or waxing about Internet latency over a beer in our cafe. At Dyn we know our greatest asset is our employees, which is why we’re always thinking about attracting and retaining great talent.

      This is why we’ve frequently been named one of the Most Democratic Workplaces in the World and we were inducted into the New Hampshire Hall of Fame as an Employer of Choice. Here’s what else we’ve been honored with."

      They can say goodbye to that and hello to endless metrics, zero raises and a culture that doesn't appreciate you if you are > 30 years of age.

    10. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Been happy with them as well.. moved off of GoDaddy to Namecheap years ago over GoDaddy's shenanigans.

    11. Re:Looking for alternatives by sgrover · · Score: 1

      Use the cloud. If you have a cloud server somewhere, the provider probably has free DNS as part of their package. DigitalOcean, Rackspace, and Google Cloud all offer this. I used DynDNS 10+ years ago, but shifted from them for various reasons. Never had to go back to them. That said, I did appreciate the service they provided and never really had a problem with that service. I wouldn't touch them now though knowing Oracle has their fingers in there. When a company becomes solely about the money, my money finds somewhere else to be.

    12. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed any issues with ZoneEdit the last few years? From their website:

      As of 2015 Zoneedit has been acquired by easyZone Corp, which is a fancy way of saying it's now a fully owned subsidiary of easyDNS

      What this means is: After a glorious run under the original founders, Zoneedit underwent a series of serial acquisitions that left it a shadow of its former self. Those days are over Caring management is back at the helm, see our Letter to Stakeholders about the acquisition here.

      Adult Supervision: There is now a team dedicated to running and maintaining Zoneedit. That includes clueful support for premium members, responsive community forums for the free users.

    13. Re:Looking for alternatives by wbr1 · · Score: 1

      for basic dynamic DNS No-IP is who I use. Works with my netgear router flawlessly.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    14. Re:Looking for alternatives by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      (in no particular order)

      - Amazon Route 53: https://aws.amazon.com/route53...
      - Google Cloud DNS: https://cloud.google.com/dns/
      - Microsoft Azure DNS: https://azure.microsoft.com/en...

      No idea what kind of DNS functionality you need, but there are also plenty other smaller players.

    15. Re: Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, you could run your own. I know it's a novel idea, but it's been done before.

    16. Re:Looking for alternatives by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I've had free DNS service from them for years, since I donated something like $20 when they still provided service for free for everyone. Guess I'll have to find a new provider, too.

    17. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not, I used them for the last decade or so at least, just for hobbyist use, always worked fine. They have a dynamic setting that works well with ddlclient, or did.

    18. Re:Looking for alternatives by XXeR · · Score: 1

      As a Dyn customer, who refuses to give even one lousy cent to Oracle, I'll be on the lookout for alternatives. Suggestions are welcome.

      https://www.cloudflare.com/

    19. Re:Looking for alternatives by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      If you are looking for DNS hosting I've been using https://freedns.afraid.org/ for many years without issue.

    20. Re: Looking for alternatives by jpenguin · · Score: 1

      DuckDNS NameCheap also has a dynamic, DNS capability

    21. Re:Looking for alternatives by arth1 · · Score: 1

      At least no-ip is one of the ddns providers that many routers have built-in support for.

      When doing failover or load balancing (multiple providers), it becomes important that the router can support it directly.

    22. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second no-ip.com - I moved away from Dyn as soon as I heard rumors about Oracle sniffing around.

    23. Re:Looking for alternatives by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I suggest no-ip.com. I moved to them after Dyn doubled their prices last year for no good reason.

      No-ip had a run-in with Microsoft a couple of years back, but came through it okay.

      Still, I'm sure Oracle knows what he's doing with his decision to buy Dyn.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    24. Re:Looking for alternatives by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      When zoneedit was acquired a few years ago, the buyers screwed over the free-tier users.

      They way they screwed over people suggests to me that zoneedit is not to be trusted for important infrastructure.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    25. Re:Looking for alternatives by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      At Dyn we know our greatest asset is our employees

      That's about as meaningful as a statement that "we value our customers and don't break any laws that we're aware of". What else are you going to say?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:Looking for alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another one is dns2go.com. They also have different levels, with dynamic DNS, email hosting, etc.

  5. Seems extreme quick unless it was already underway by raymorris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When I've sold even the tiniest companies, with just two or three employees, it took a few months from initial discussion to a public announcement. I'd be very surprised if a deal this size was done in a month or two. I'd think they probably had a memorandum of understanding, setting a price subject to due diligence, six months ago.

  6. Another company to die a slow death under Oracle by tearmeapart · · Score: 1

    Oracle likely made their calculations, and have determined they can extract plenty of money from the Dyn customers to make the acquisition worth it.
    I, for one, will be moving away from Dyn ASAP, after being a satisfied customer for ~15 years.
    Does anyone have any suggestions for a reliable and secure DNS?

    Discussion at new.ycombinator:
    https://news.ycombinator.com/i...

  7. Oracrap is the new M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, amirite?

    1. Re:Oracrap is the new M$ by O-Deka-K · · Score: 1

      More like "Devour, Digest, Defecate".

  8. From dynamic DNS script to being bought by Oracle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't amazing what big businesses can't create on their own and have to buy instead?

  9. They keep using that word. by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 4, Insightful

    “We've also asked for a comment from Oracle about Dyn's recent breach”

    Since when does a DDoS qualify as a “breach?”

  10. Sigh by ledow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ba-da dum-dum-dum. Another one bites the dust...

    Sorry Dyn. I was a customer of yours. But everything that Oracle touches is to eliminate competition and kill the products that existed.

    It was nice knowing you.

    Anyone know of a way to set up your own Dyn-compatible dynamic DNS system? I have a remote server, and a way to change the dyndns.org URLs in use but I think the protocol is undocumented or certain without available SERVER software (client software is another matter).

    And most of the things I want to change that use it are hardcoded into the Dyn protocols, so I can't just "use something else", even if the devices allow the end-address to be changed to my own server.

    1. Re:Sigh by HBI · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was hosting with Linode, they had an API call to update a DNS A record. As long as you requested a key from them, you could write a script on a local host to reach out to them and update the A record when the box or router would change addresses. Replicating that functionality if you need it should be fairly trivial.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    2. Re:Sigh by wbr1 · · Score: 1
      no-ip

      You're welcome.

      --
      Silence is a state of mime.
    3. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zoneedit has (at least used to) a dynamic API that worked perfectly well with ddclient.

    4. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Full disclosure: I'm a contributor to this project and I wrote the code that supports DynDNS.

      If you're willing to run your own DNS server, you can take a look at PowerDNS-Admin, it's a user interface for PowerDNS that eases management of DNS zones but also supports the DynDNS protocol, so you can use DynDNS clients (like ddclient).

      https://github.com/ngoduykhanh/PowerDNS-Admin

    5. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dyn is a company who hosts DNS. dyndns is a different thing.

      Literally anyone who offers DNS hosting can offer a compatible product to Dyn. So, that leaves you with a few hundred thousand options.

      Usually your registrar offers at least a basic service for free along with your domain registration. You may want a back-up, though.

    6. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://andrwe.org/linux/own-ddns

  11. Re:From dynamic DNS script to being bought by Orac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Isn't amazing what big businesses can't create on their own and have to buy instead?

    An established user base? Yeah, that’s not usually created out of thin air.

  12. Solution to stop acquisitions? by bradley13 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wish there were some solution to stop acquisitions like this: a small company with a decent product is consumed by some multinational giant. The product may live on for a few years, but ultimately it gets transmogrified into something unrecognizable and - as often as not - useless. But the multinational now has the patents needed to prevent competition.

    Look at what Oracle is trying to do with Java: suing Google for using the fricking APIs. Microsoft is renowned for this as well: "extend, embrace, extinguish".

    While I'm no fan of government regulation, I have the feeling that this is part-and-parcel of "too big to fail", and requires government intervention. Companies should not be allowed to grow beyond a certain size. If a company reaches that size, it must divest or split itself into smaller, independent entities.

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
    1. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by geekmux · · Score: 2

      I wish there were some solution to stop acquisitions like this...Companies should not be allowed to grow beyond a certain size. If a company reaches that size, it must divest or split itself into smaller, independent entities.

      We do (or at least did) have such protections in place, in the form of anti-monopoly laws.

      They are blatantly ignored today with 55-gallon drums of palm grease, brought forth by the very monopolies who maintain lobbyist armies.

      Capitalism used to be king. Corruption is now, because those who could do something about it don't give a shit.

    2. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had DNS provided by EveryDNS back in the day...Dyn bought them out and since I had paid money to the otherwise free EveryDNS service, I was brought in with lifetime Dyn Standard DNS service. It's been pretty handy at times.

      Here's to hoping Oracle honors that.

      On another note, it's interesting that when Dyn bought EveryDNS, EveryDNS informed me of it, but I haven't heard anything from Dyn about this...

    3. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by nick4wo · · Score: 1

      this has a certain level of anti trust monopoly to it, if they let the buyout go through

      --
      Nick | http://4wheelonline.com
    4. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 2

      There is no barrier to entry. Go find some VC funding and start a competitor.

    5. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I wish there were some solution to stop acquisitions like this

      Trump will stop it. He said Comcast should never have been allowed to buy NBC Universal, and he's already stated he wants to stop the AT&T / Time Warner merger.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    6. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      We do (or at least did) have such protections in place, in the form of anti-monopoly laws.

      Not even remotely relevant in the situations being discussed. Anti-monopoly does not prevent a large company from acquiring a small company even if it's the last company. It is only relevant in a common market, or a converging market.

      So unless Oracle is a DynDNS provider and starts gobbling up all DynDNS providers it's irrelevant.

    7. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by gtall · · Score: 2

      Bzzzzt. Wrong. With the new Republican majority and The Cheeto, they find regulations abhorrent. So there'll be no regulatin' on their watch. How does this square with their whining about banks too big to fail? It doesn't, but contradictions like this never bothered them.

    8. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      While I'm no fan of government regulation, I have the feeling that this is part-and-parcel of "too big to fail", and requires government intervention. Companies should not be allowed to grow beyond a certain size. If a company reaches that size, it must divest or split itself into smaller, independent entities.

      Surely the main reason we have such monstrously large companies is government intervention in the first place, due to the "too big to fail" mentality.

    9. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      We do (or at least did) have such protections in place, in the form of anti-monopoly laws.

      Not even remotely relevant in the situations being discussed. Anti-monopoly does not prevent a large company from acquiring a small company even if it's the last company. It is only relevant in a common market, or a converging market.

      So unless Oracle is a DynDNS provider and starts gobbling up all DynDNS providers it's irrelevant.

      The impact of the botnet attack against the DynDNS provider wasn't insignificant, but hey let's keep jumping through the legal minutiae that allow oligopolies and monopolies to continue to grow today.

      Ironically, because Oracle isn't a DynDNS provider by trade, there's not a damn thing stopping them from "gobbling up all DynDNS providers". Gotta love those bullshit loopholes.

    10. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      I wish there were some solution to stop acquisitions like this: a small company with a decent product is consumed by some multinational giant. The product may live on for a few years, but ultimately it gets transmogrified into something unrecognizable and - as often as not - useless. But the multinational now has the patents needed to prevent competition.

      I don't think DYN is a small company anymore. They may have started as a small organization providing free dynamic DNS services decades ago, but then a few years ago they got rid of it and commercialized the heck out of their paid offerings. And given how many big companies were affected by the Dyn DDOS, I'd expect them to be a fairly large company.

      Heck, they got rid of free dyndns WITHOUT Oracle's help. To me, that was the downfall - they went from being a "small community organization" to "major company that now focuses on bottom line".

    11. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To prevent an acquisition like this, simply don't take your small business public.

    12. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish there were some solution to stop acquisitions like this: a small company with a decent product is consumed by some multinational giant.

      In the USA, the solution would be to accuse the multinational giant of some kind of sexual harassment.

    13. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by virtig01 · · Score: 1

      Dyn isn't a public company.

    14. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by organgtool · · Score: 1

      Capitalism used to be king.

      I can think of few things that represent capitalism better than one giant corporation buying another.

    15. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      There's nothing bullshit or loophole about it. It's the damn title of the law. You can't apply laws intended to prevent unchecked accumulation of power by a monopoly using anti-trust legislation when the actual target isn't a monopoly.

      Just because someone is huge doesn't make them a monopoly. If Google opened a coffee shop tomorrow would they be a monopoly on coffee? No. If they bought Starbucks would they be? No. Is competition in any way reduced by one company not in a business acquiring another company that is? No.

      Yes something should be done about it, but at this point you may as well just throw a jaywalking charge at them. Given the number of employees they have statistically there's more of a chance of them having committed jaywalking than applying the irrelevant laws you are citing.

    16. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      There's nothing bullshit or loophole about it. It's the damn title of the law. You can't apply laws intended to prevent unchecked accumulation of power by a monopoly using anti-trust legislation when the actual target isn't a monopoly.

      So, in the example I provided, Oracle is not in the primary business of DynDNS, so today they are legally entitled buy up and control the entire market of DynDNS services if they wanted to, to include pricing collusion to essentially destroy future competition.

      And yet current law magically prevents the "unchecked accumulation of power" in this scenario. Nope, no loophole to see here, move along.

      No, they are not a monopoly per se today, but there's not a damn thing preventing them from becoming one.

    17. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dyn is not a small company, they have been gobbling up their own competitors and products for years.

    18. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Nope, no loophole to see here, move along.

      Do you really not understand that a law not applying at all, not even in it's title, is not the same thing as a loophole?

    19. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by geekmux · · Score: 1

      Nope, no loophole to see here, move along.

      Do you really not understand that a law not applying at all, not even in it's title, is not the same thing as a loophole?

      Do you not understand the fact that it is essentially a loophole that allows the law to not apply at all in order to effectively prevent the unchecked accumulation of power? My example still stands to demonstrate the obvious ridiculousness of "anti" monopoly laws, which appear to be essentially forged in swiss cheese to allow monopolies and oligopolies to be created and perpetuate today.

      Forgive me. You are correct. Perhaps I should have defined this as bullshit semantics instead.

    20. Re:Solution to stop acquisitions? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Do you not understand the fact that it is essentially a loophole that allows the law to not apply at all in order to effectively prevent the unchecked accumulation of power?

      So it's a loophole in the murder laws that I can't apply them to you because you didn't murder anyone?

      So why are you trying to apply anti-trust laws to cases which aren't anti-trust?

  13. ASUS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Asus routers have their own dyn like service as an option in the dyndns section of the router. I don't know if it's using dyn technologies or provider though. Anyone know?

  14. I was a founding member of DynDNS.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Free DNS for life - My ass!

  15. Breach? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did I miss something? I thought they were the target of a DDOS attack, not a "breach".

  16. Re: Another company to die a slow death under Orac by corychristison · · Score: 4, Informative

    How many domains?

    I am a customer of Softlayer, and their free (for customers) Anycast DNS service is absolutely fantastic. I piggyback my clients onto their DNS (~100 domains including my own) and we've never seen an issue.

    Another company I've had experience with is ClouDNS.net. I moved to softlayer simply because they offered Anycast and it was free with a server I'm renting from them. ClouDND.net now offers Anycast. I'm planning to use them as a secondary DNS in conjunction with Softlayer, because, well, redundancy.

  17. Re: Another company to die a slow death under Ora by corychristison · · Score: 1

    s/ClouDND.net/ClouDNS.net/g

  18. Remember the early Dyn? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think Dyn started out as a community effort rather than an explicit for-profit. I signed on back then. I seem to remember signing on for something long-term, for not much money. Not long after that they went commercial. My sign-on was supposed to be carried over to a year's service or something, I don't remember and I didn't pursue it because I was only interested in the community effort.

    1. Re:Remember the early Dyn? by FreelanceWizard · · Score: 2

      I remember those days. I was one of the paid community supporters before they went commercial, and when they did, I got free lifetime custom DNS service for a single domain as well as free lifetime premium service for dynamic DNS in the dyndns.org domain. The quality of Dyn as a provider, and their willingness to keep their end of that deal (unlike, say, Joyent), is why I use them as my registrar and why I've recommended them professionally despite the fact that there are far less expensive alternatives (such as AWS Route 53 or Azure DNS).

      Shortly after the deal closes and integration begins, I expect that my lifetime service will be terminated ("to better serve our customers"), the cost will skyrocket (because this is Oracle we're talking about), and I'll be forced to move to another provider. It was fun while it lasted, I suppose...

      --
      The Freelance Wizard
    2. Re: Remember the early Dyn? by Rob_Bryerton · · Score: 2

      I do remember. I signed on for some light-weight services when they were small (like you mentioned) and signed up for some lifetime something or other. Really, it was like paying for 2 years up front or something cheap like that so I thought 'what the heck'. A while later, I had forgotten all about my account there, but needed the service there again, so I reset my password, signed in and to my surprise saw that I had been grandfathered into to a lifetime subscription even though they went commercial. Which I thought was really cool of them.

      We'll see if Oracle honors that service tier...

    3. Re:Remember the early Dyn? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Same here. When they went commercial, I got a "VIP" label and free DNS service for my domain, since I had donated something like $20. I highly doubt that service will continue under Oracle.

    4. Re:Remember the early Dyn? by Que_Ball · · Score: 1

      Yep, lifetime VIP and lifetime free standard DNS for up to 50 domains here.  Donated to dyndns in the 90s and bought lifetime with editdns before they were taken over by dyndns.

      For anyone who was paying it was already looking pretty bad with constant price increases and reductions in features and service for the lower priced options.  Only the fully managed anycast DNS platform appeared to be getting much attention.  Host logs from dynamic clients has been broken for years for example.  The number of requests allowed for standard DNS keeps getting lowered and I cannot name a single new feature they have added to standard DNS in the last 5 years.  You cannot even allow zone transfers anymore since they took over from editdns so during the ddos you could not have secondary DNS with another provider unless you manually recreate the zone entries.

  19. Prepare your... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prepare yourself for the Oraculling...

  20. Re: From dynamic DNS script to being bought by Ora by corychristison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dyn grew by buying up small time DNS providers... a lot of them!

    If I recall correctly, Slashdot had a few discussions about how large they were getting buying out other providers, and how bad it was to place so much trust in a single company.

  21. we need to see the great success in Oracle live! by Yonsy · · Score: 1

    for example

    OpenOffice ... almost dead
    Netbeans ... almost dead
    OpenSolaris ... dead
    Glassfish Server ... dead in commercial
    MySQL ... almost dead first, now in war with MariaDB

    we can see the glorious destination that DNS register will have ... maybe we are going to need to host DNS registers now in Oracle RACs!

  22. Re:Seems extreme quick unless it was already under by houghi · · Score: 1

    6 months ago the price was set. That means that the talks where ongoing before that. However that means not that much as everybody already talks with everybody anyway.
    This happens in all markets. At least once per year the question will be asked:
    1) Are we for sale
    2) Are we interested in buying others.

    And they are not exclusive.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  23. Whelp... time for something else by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    I guess it's time to find an alternative service.

  24. Hmmm by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    Good thing I use no-ip for my basic needs. I don't want to support Oracle if I can help it. I wouldn't piss on Larry Ellison if he was on fire.

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  25. Ouch by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    Well that sucks. Dyn bought my DNS provider, EveryDNS a few years ago. Even though they promised to keep providing services for donors, they really made you jump through a lot of hoops to keep it, the services were very limited, and every contact with them was an up-sell opportunity.

    I'm sure with this acquisition that promise will be completely broken, as Oracle loves to monetize everything. Time to find another DNS provider. Again.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  26. Or EasyDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a long time fan of EasyDNS, always worth using, no hassles. Canadian company.

    1. Re:Or EasyDNS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EasyDNS has amazing support.

  27. Re: From dynamic DNS script to being bought by Ora by arth1 · · Score: 2

    If I recall correctly, Slashdot had a few discussions about how large they were getting buying out other providers, and how bad it was to place so much trust in a single company.

    And now we see how bad it was, and how right people were.
    I honestly cannot think of a company that I think could be worse. Blizzard or Symantec, perhaps. No, Oracle is still worse.

  28. Re:Another company to die a slow death under Oracl by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

    I've been using Zonomi for some domains for several years. It's not completely free, but damn close to it, and you only pay for what you use.

    --
    "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
    --- Jerry Garcia
  29. Re: Another company to die a slow death under Ora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They even migrated dungeons n dragons to the cloud? We are all fucked. Is there nothing they won't turn into a cloud?

  30. I don't remember either... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I had them way back in the late 90s for providing domain access to services on my dialup computer. They were pretty good as a free service back then (you got a second level domain or hostname off one of the dozens of pretty cool tlds they had back then, and if you needed a dynamically allocated tld they could provide that service for you as well!) Then they started changing how often you had to log in the website to keep your registration, and at some point punted people from a bunch of the previously free domains they had offered and only allowed them for premium use. At some point I jumped to noip before finally saying 'This whole DNS thing is stupid' and moving to Tor and then I2P hidden services. Nowadays there are lots of alternatives to the 'Imaginary Property' cash cow that DNS has become, and if more people could migrate their services towards them the current domain land grab could be curbed.

  31. Re: Another company to die a slow death under Ora by mark-t · · Score: 1

    And this is a reason why slashdot sorely needs a 5 minute window to edit comments.... The preview mode is fine, but often doesn't seem to help much because of how tightly coupled it is to the editor, much like how one can notice typos more easily seeing them on paper than they will even in the print-preview mode of a word processor.

  32. Re: From dynamic DNS script to being bought by Ora by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

    Electronic Arts presents: DNS2017* *DLC required to access certain parts of the internet, not available in all regions.

    --
    Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
  33. EasyDNS and Libertarians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Dyn customer, who refuses to give even one lousy cent to Oracle, I'll be on the lookout for alternatives. Suggestions are welcome.

    EasyDNS is pretty good, and is based in Canada if you're worried about take downs and such:

    * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EasyDNS

    The CEO has run for the Libertarians in elections and so if you care about online rights, he's probably a person/company to support:

    * https://www.libertarian.ca/candidate/mark-e-jeftovic
    * https://twitter.com/stuntpope

    They have integrations with Amazon Route 53, CIRA's D-Zone, Linode and Zoneedit (who they own) if you need the extra resiliency:

    * http://blog.easydns.org/2010/08/19/dos-attacks-and-dns-how-to-stay-up-if-your-dns-provider-goes-down/

    I've used them for my person domain for about a decade, and we use it for work (before I even got here).

  34. How refreshing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the good old days, you only needed a couple of bucks, which you gave to your DNS-provider.
    They then had some kind of a zone-file editor - preferable web based - and your were good to go...

    Oracle?

    Ahhh.. Now you need a complete infrastructure, 250 GB harddrive space, 8 GB RAM, and of course your zone-file editor will be dependent on their database (+a bunch of other dependencies)... License? Well... You need it to be accesible on the Internet you say? How many users? The whole lot? Ah... Ok.. That'll be xxx*10^y USD, and then we need you to pay 15-30% of that each year for our support fee... Welcome!

  35. https://nsupdate.info/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does IP v4 and v6, has quite some nice extra functions.

    Is free and open source software and also a free service.

    https://nsupdate.info/ (also on github)

  36. Fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we have to install Java and Ask Toolbar to do a DNA query now?

  37. dns.he.net by higuita · · Score: 3, Informative

    dns.he.net

    it is free, works very well
    yes, it do not have all the features of dyn, but have what i need

    --
    Higuita
  38. freedns.afraid.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using this guy for a while.

  39. April 2019,....... by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    My paid account ends then, let's see if Oracle somehow manage to fuck it entirely before then,...?

    I really like the HUGE amount of modems / routers / cable boxes etc which support Dyn. Does anyone know of a product which even comes close? The closest I can think of is no-ip.com, they seem to be fairly common on a handful of cheap and pricey routers but still not as many as Dyn.

  40. Re: Another company to die a slow death under Ora by corychristison · · Score: 1

    And on mobile there is no preview at all, which is what I usually use to browse and comment on Slashdot.

  41. Know anything about soliciting without rumors? by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Do you have some experience with this? I've sold a couple businesses and the problem has always been how to solicit bids without a) encouraging silly rumors to start and b) revealing too much about the financials of my privately-held company to competitors or potential competitors, who may or may not have a genuine interest in buying my company.

    1. Re:Know anything about soliciting without rumors? by houghi · · Score: 1

      Rumours can not be prevented. They will reflect mostly the fear of change. People do not like change. How do they start? Because people will learn that you are talking to other companies. How do they know? That depends.
      I know that some people asked to book a beetingroom in a hotel. As this was not standard, it started rumours. I know where people had a folder named after the other company.
      Even people from the other company calling the wroong number and asked to be transfered can be enough.
      And it does not even have to be your company that leaks. It is a small world and it could be that the other company has a different policy and are very open about what they do, or are less secrative and somebody at your company knows somebody at their company directly or indirectly.

      So what to take away from it? You will not be able to prevent rumours, so the best thing is to be as honest as legally possible.

      And revealing too much? That is what NDAs are for. It depends also on who contacyed who. Unless there is something very secretive going on or you are trying to hide your real numbers, there should not really be an issue.
      They will not start to know the process just toknow your numbers. They will already know your numbers. They will know who your customers are and have a rough idea on how you operate.

      So what you need to do is talk and see WHY they are buying your company and is that something you are selling. e.g. are they interested in your customers, in your products or in your staff. And in what combination? What do they think buying your company will bring them. Does it seem logical what they are saying or not.

      And even if they don't buydoes not mean they where after your numbers. It just did not work out. And if the reasons seem to be stupid to you, it does not mean they won't buy at the price you like.

      The first contacts will not be genuine contacts to buy. It is interest. Windowshopping and that is what everybody does.

      Depending on how scared you are, you could let them look at the numbers indirectly by a third party. I also have known that a company opened their books for 5 potential buyers of the company and gave them a fixed amount of tile to look at the data. They where able to see what they were looking at and thus understood how to geotiate with each of them. That was a company that already had informed its employees they were going to close. Living in Belgium, people got a very nice bonus out of that.

      And as always YMMV. Sales is much more social, so you have to deal with people, not just numbers. One company getting sold was so close to getting a great deal, but it did not work out because the CEOs of the companies could not stand each other.

      So in short: You can't prevent ru,ours and you will never know if they are really interested in buying or just curious.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  42. Re:Seems extreme quick unless it was already under by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    6 months ago the price was set.

    And with a stroke of a pen, the price can be changed.

    And they are not exclusive.

    Lots of acquisition deals have an agreement of exclusivity during the negotiation period. Personally, I don't think that it is likely to be a good deal for the selling company, but it happens.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  43. Thanks by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that.

  44. Trillium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember when Curilian Studios conveniently forgot they sold lifetime updates several years after they released 1.0. I bought a license of 0.97 (or something close) for $25 (for beta software) and for that was granted lifetime updates. "We never said that, why are there 1000s of people that distinctly remember that and are accusing us of fraud?!?!"

    I have a lifetime support for 3 of my domains. Let's see how long those last.

  45. To avoid DNS security issues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: ... & to resolve hostnames faster locally w/ less APK Hosts File Engine 9.0++ SR-4 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?...

    Ads rob speed, security (malvertising) & privacy (tracking).

    Hosts add speed (hardcodes/adblocks), security (bad sites/poisoned dns), reliability (dns down), & anonymity (dns requestlogs/trackers) natively.

    Works vs. caps & PUSH ads.

    Avg. page = big as Doom http://www.theregister.co.uk/2... & ads = 40% of it.

    Hosts != ClarityRay blockable (vs. souled-out to admen inferior wasteful redundant slow usermode addons)

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus (slows you) + less security issues/complexity.

    Compliments firewalls (blocking less used IP addys vs. hosts blocking more used domains) & DNS (lightens dns load).

    Gets data via 10 security sites.

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/... (Verified by Malwarebytes' S. Burn "seen the code & it's safe" http://forum.hosts-file.net/vi... )

  46. 100's of known DNS issues in 18 categories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: For references to back my initial post w/ facts on actual DNS security & inefficiency vs. hosts files https://news.slashdot.org/comm...

    APK

    P.S.=> Seeing as how the last time I posted this here was unjustifiably downmoderated to effetely & vainly try "hide" it, lol... apk