Slashdot Mirror
Google, Cuba Sign Deal Allowing Faster Access To Company's Data (go.com)
Google has signed a deal with the Cuban government on Monday that will grant internet users in the Communist-run country quicker access to its branded content. Google plans to install servers on the island that will store a majority of its most popular content. ABC News reports: Storing Google data in Cuba eliminates the long distances that signals must travel from the island through Venezuela to the nearest Google server. More than a half century after cutting virtually all economic ties with Cuba, the U.S. has no direct data link to the island. The deal announced Monday removes one of the many obstacles to a normal internet in Cuba, which suffers from some of the world's most limited and expensive access. Home connections remain illegal for most Cubans and the government charges the equivalent of a month's average salary for 10 hours of access to public WiFi spots with speeds frequently too slow to download files or watch streaming video. The deal does not affect Cuba's antiquated communications infrastructure or broaden public access to the internet, but it could make Google websites like YouTube or Gmail up to 10 times faster for users inside Cuba. Content hosted by other companies will not be affected.
Was it that hard?
Move to Cuba > buy internet access >start storing the internet in a series of servers > broadcast for lower rates > profit!
Seriously - any deal to give Cuban government insiders (do you really think any of the little people will benefit from this?) better internet access - or better anything - is evil.
Do you have ESP?
I've wanted to visit Cuba for many years, but the US (even with the recent softening) is extremely hostile to Cuba. And, forbids its citizens from visiting.
It is easy enough to get around this restriction by flying out of another country, and claiming your passport lost upon return (if you can't get Cuban immigration officials to stamp a piece of paper instead of your passport directly).
But, you have to travel with only cash. Your US issued bank card will not work, and you would get in trouble if it did, due to violating the embargo.
So, Google is also based in this same country that restricts freedom of travel and association of its citizens-- how does Google get away with this when humans are forbidden.
is to run a cable from Miami to Havana.
Yeah so if this happened here in America we'd have the usual litany of whines about how Net Neutrality has been destroyed and that it's all Trump's fault blah blah blah.
But if it happens in Cuba? Cool, no problem.
AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
How is adding local servers for to serve contents of local interest violating Net Neutrality in anyway?
I'm sure Trump will divest but honestly who cares?
Anybody with a lick of sense. Not only should he divest, he should give up all his assets into the care of the Treasury.
The reason so much of America hired him is because he is a businessman, not a politician.
Maybe, but they're not all gullible enough that they won't be concerned if he starts enriching himself apt their expense.
The fact that he has so many company assets to divest shows that all of the people saying Trump was not very successful were obviously lying.
Nope, it means you were obviously not listeningto the details. He's morally bankrupt, obviously, but he has managed a web of assets. People who have been saying he was not successful mean things like not successful to the extent he claims, and that many of his alleged assets are really concealed under a mask of deceits, a shell game.
At least Trumps conflicts of interest are all public, unlike the rest of DC who hides financial ties under several layers and family connections. I would be fine with Trump keeping stake in his companies and simply disclosing when any proposals he makes may benefit him.
Too bad for you that Trump's conflicts on interest are not all public, his financial ties are hidden under
several layers and family connections. Even his own assets are a complicated mess of mortgages, loans, disbursements and other such things. Oh wait, did you think he straight up owned only stuff with his name blazoned on it? Hardly.
Heck, just see if he has assets in Boeing or Lockheed Martin. Or assets that beneft from their fall.
How is adding local servers for to serve contents of local interest violating Net Neutrality in anyway?
You knew full well when you posted that comment that the commenter was keying off of the first sentence in the summary. But go ahead and play naive troll.
I.e. the clickbait summary clearly intended for that impression to get passed along. Sounds just like a net neutrality violation to me. Oh, but now you are going to tell me that net neutrality involves nuance that a lot of people don't have the technical background to grok. Got it. We all know the clickbait would be less effective if the summary said something like "Google pays somebody to host some caching/CDN servers".
Installing local servers is not a violation of net neutrality.
then you know it's of huge importance to Google. What you see here is not market expansion, but a political mission, and one that Cuba should be wary of.
What about AMP articles, which are others' content but are sometimes stored by Google?
"will grant internet users in the Communist-run country"
So...all three of them?
Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
Storing Google data in Cuba eliminates the long distances that signals must travel from the island through Venezuela to the nearest Google server.
Seriously? The great distance is slowing down the signal?
If you happen to be well connected to the government or the communist party of Cuba, you can have ADSL to your home from Etecsa. It is not illegal to have internet to your house. It costs an arm and a leg, so the rich can get it. I have spent three weeks there and you would be amazed the number locked WiFi spots there are, eg in Trinidad, but ordinary folk and tourists, it's to public squares or near hotels for their access via expensive Etecsa WiFi, whose servers can't cope.