Slashdot Mirror


Twitter Blocks Government 'Spy Centers' From Accessing User Data (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: Twitter has blocked federally funded "domestic spy centers" from using a powerful social media monitoring tool after public records revealed that the government had special access to users' information for controversial surveillance efforts. The American Civil Liberties Union of California discovered that so-called fusion centers, which collect intelligence, had access to monitoring technology from Dataminr, an analytics company partially owned by Twitter. The ACLU's records prompted the companies to announce that Dataminr had terminated access for all fusion centers and would no longer provide social media surveillance tools to any local, state or federal government entities. The government centers are partnerships between agencies that work to collect vast amounts of information purportedly to analyze "threats". The spy centers, according to the ACLU, target protesters, journalists and others protected by free speech rights while also racially profiling people deemed "suspicious" by law enforcement. Records that the ACLU obtained uncovered that a fusion center in southern California had access to Dataminr's "geospatial analysis application", which allowed the government to do location-based tracking as well as searches tied to keywords. That means the center could use Dataminr to search billions of tweets and monitor specific demographics or organizations.

46 comments

  1. Mod parent down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NT

  2. Unless they make gay wedding cakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Some companies are more equal than others.

  3. Black lives matters should be monitored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    and it is good to hear that they have been.
    Since there are supporters of all colors, I don't think it is fair to call it racial profiling though, they are violent criminals that disrupt order, call for the killing of cops and white people.
    Stop giving them a free pass.

  4. No effect really by Casualposter · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The agencies will simply create a corporation and have it do all of the data mining and then sell the information to the government for a fee. Not going to stop this behavior at all.

    --
    Creative Spelling Copyright (2002). May use without Persimmons
    1. Re:No effect really by admin7087 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, people need to understand that if they Tweet or publish anything else on the Internet or mobile phones, their data will be mined by many third parties. If they don't like that, they need to resort to more private p2p means of communication.

    2. Re:No effect really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dataminr actually is a corporation that does data mining and sells the information to the government for a fee. From TFA:

      By giving government agencies access to these tools, Dataminr was also clearly violating Twitter’s policy prohibiting the use of its data for surveillance, according to the ACLU.

      Twitter forced a private company (of which they have only 5% ownership) to stop using the platform for spying. Presumably by threat of 'do this or we cut you off completely for violating TOS'. So yes, this really does make an impact.

    3. Re:No effect really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ... private P2P means of communication.

      That requires a certificate server, which is susceptible to MitM attacks, or software that can automatically generate keys, send the public key to a recipient and double encrypt (receiver's public key and sender's private key) messages. For better security, a unique key can be assigned to each recipient. For some reason, open-source foundations are not developing this much-needed software library. Because servers need to access fields in the transport protocol, encryption can be implemented as middle-ware only when MIME headers (declaring encrypted data) are allowed in all transport protocols.

    4. Re:No effect really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and now the gov't will just make shell companies to buy the data or send them an NSL or such and force them to cooperate quietly.

      They're more than willing to sell this to the public, just not the government. I'm surprised the government lets them discriminate against it, frankly.

  5. Re:I hope Trump uses the data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope you learn to read.

  6. Now I'm really worried by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is anyone else slightly worried by this?

    Like... if government and law enforcement aren't allowed access to that data, who else are they having as customers at their datamining company?

    --
    bickerdyke
    1. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. I think all companies should do this. I don't think people should allow their governments access to their private data without a warrant. It's in the constitution after all.

      If this continues, then basically no one would know what government was tracking, and if journalists released any of it to allow people transparency, government would charge the journalists, stating that they "stole" data. In fact, government had originally stolen that private data from people and it doesn't belong to government to begin with.

    2. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I don't really like ANYONE having such information, Twitter can't throw you in jail.

    3. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just want the government to pay like everyone else?

    4. Re: Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ding ding ding. It is time to renegotiate the contract.

    5. Re:Now I'm really worried by gnick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think people should allow their governments access to their private data without a warrant.

      A large part of the debate is what "private" means. If you post it in a social forum, is it private? If you communicate it directly to another user on a social forum, is that private? If you watch "Dr. Horrible's Sing Along Blog" on YouTube, is that private? If you click an ad for ZipLocks, is that private? If you send an e-mail with the phrase, "Meet me at the capitol at noon - I have the guns and explosives - Bwahaha! We'll kill them all!" is that private? It's all worth money to the right buyer - And the companies that collect that data love to sell it.

      --
      He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
    6. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As someone who used to work in this industry, Twitter (through their third party data brokers) will happily sell this data directly to law enforcement and Homeland Security. They already do. The news here is that they cut off a third party who is buying the data, analyzing it, and selling results. There are many more vendors offering similar services, and the model will probably shift to get the data through the government instead of directly from Twitter as a result.

    7. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The trick is encrypt your shit and pollute their databases with misinformation.

    8. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason Twitter did anything is because the ACLU published. Twitter doesn't care who or what their data subscribers sell to - as long as Twitter gets paid. Only when it threatens to become a bad PR problem does Twitter act.

      Instead, Twitter will happily and publicly celebrate selling every detail of your life to private companies, who will proceed to advertise your every secret to you, your family, your neighbors, or even mere acquaintances. After all, some of them may be interested in the same sorts of porn you are, or use the same hair dyes, or ...

    9. Re:Now I'm really worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Understood. Twitter after all is open broadcast. I still get a really bad feeling about government organizations willy-nilly creating social graphs and using that for decisions.

    10. Re:Now I'm really worried by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      It sounds like it's only US government that's being kept away from the info. We can rest assured that other countries' spy agencies will continue to have full access.

  7. Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Note how they didn't shut the operation down, they just cut off a few of the data subscribers. The analytics company is still running doing exactly the same thing and giving out exactly the same information.

    The article states Dataminr was in volition of Twitter's ToS. Was Dataminr blocked? Sued? Taken to court for the federal crime of unauthorized computer access (which happens to individuals when they break someone's ToS)? Nope. Dataminr and Twitter are still close friends. Twitter still gives it a live feed of all its data. Why care about laws then you're buddies with the people who decide how selective their selectively enforce will be? Something you do is illegal but you're friends with high people? No worries, you'll never be targeted. Those laws aren't for you while I stay in charge, best you help keep me here.

    1. Re:Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's vital to their profit line. That's the insane hypocrisy. Data mine to make them millions in $$ - They're ok. Data mine try and detect malicious attackers - "OMG OMG!! You're racial profiling. You're infringing on my rights. OMG OMG OMG!!" Data mine to sell shit - "Oh hey big boy! Here's our API!!"

    2. Re: Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please state the law that Dataminer violates. Hint: look high and low - you will not find that the company violated any law.

    3. Re: Meaningless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violating a site's terms of use, which Twitter admits Dataminr did, is a violation of the federal computer fraud and abuse act (no matter how stupid that is).

  8. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    please go back on your meds

  9. Re:I hope Trump uses the data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So you're in support of allowing more Muslims to enter the country so they can go camping. That's real nice of you. Our national parks are great places to visit.

  10. Twitter is finished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    No "Crooked Hillary" emoji, and now failing to help spy on muslims and mexicans. Trump is going to shut these fuckers down for sure.

    1. Re:Twitter is finished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahaha! Can you imagine?! Trump shutting down his favorite place to use his tiny hands to vent about every perceived slight his thin skinned man-baby persona! That'll be the day! Thanks for the lulz!

    2. Re:Twitter is finished by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No babyhands emoji, no emojis of orange people - I'm sorry, I mean Oompa-Loompa-Americans - it's clear discrimination!

  11. Oh look kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a racist!

    1. Re:Oh look kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step away from the mirror. It's not actually another person.

    2. Re: Oh look kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Black Lives Matter is a provocation network run by George Soros.

  12. Stop please by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The American Civil Liberties Union of California discovered that so-called fusion centers, which collect intelligence, had access to monitoring technology from Dataminr, an analytics company partially owned by Twitter.

    The English language already has a word for government information gathering fusion aggregation and analysis centers: panopticon.

    The most important guiding principle behind the design of the US constitution is not allowing the government to build the tools of tyranny to begin with. If it doesn't exist, it cannot be abused. That is the only principle that seems to work historically, and, more specifically, relying on "the vote" to prevent government from going into the dictatorial weeds has been shown full of failure in various historical democracies. Indeed, said vote more often than not is the end downfall as "emergency powers" are issued to a charismatic demagogue who never relinquishes it.

    No panopticons. And no emergency powers to use to build the panopticon's data gathering. Stop giving these things to government.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Stop please by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Your "da gubbmint is bad, where's MUH CONSTITUTION" rant is so hilarious, grandpa. Is it time for your militia meeting yet? Don't forget to bring your M-16 and this time you don't get the bullets after you accidentally shot that kid last time. Be sure to blame Obama, and your medication is on the table. Be back in time to watch Alex Jones' latest Pizzagate update at 6!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re: Stop please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Supreme Court will support that gathering publically available information does not violate the 4th amendment.

      I get it that /. hates the government and Intelligence agencies. What /. Nation needs to realize is there is nothing that violates the constitution or laws in the case if Dataminer.

  13. drain the swamp! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one by one, these "social media" companies should be drained -- of their dollars -- by responsible individuals who refuse to use (be used) by their service

    1. Re:drain the swamp! by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

      one by one, these "social media" companies should be drained -- of their dollars -- by responsible individuals who refuse to use (be used) by their service

      The problem here is that "responsible individuals" of the type to which you refer, are in the minority. Although social media companies would be ecstatic if 100% of the population would bend over for them, they seem pretty satisfied with the 78% -and-growing market penetration they currently enjoy.

      --
      'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
    2. Re:drain the swamp! by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 1

      Well, at least now that Trump has been elected the left-wing sites all care about privacy from government officials again. So that and the sudden new interest in hard-hitting investigative journalism about the post January 20th executive branch in the media should help a little bit.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
  14. The government has the trump card: NSL by schwit1 · · Score: 1

    Game over.

  15. And you are a loony bird. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cacaw cacaw!
     
    Fly away now back to your fortress of doom!

  16. Who cares? Twitter blocks everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They've banned anyone who's vagina aches, and soon twitter will have no one left to block :)

  17. Publically available data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You do realize all of this information can be seen by anyone on the Internet? It is publically available information and government is allowed by legal and policy to use it for authorized purposes?

  18. Breaking fake news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twitter is for all users rights. Jack isnt a tyrant at all. Everything is fine. Wrongthink is removed for your safety. Twitter does not manipulate trending topic lists, or hand any data over to Oceana.