Slashdot Mirror
A Century of Surveillance: An Interactive Timeline Of FBI Investigations (muckrock.com)
"Over a century of fear and filing cabinets" at the FBI has been exposed through six years of Freedom of Information Act requests. And now MuckRock founder (and long-time Slashdot reader) v3rgEz writes:
MuckRock recently published its 100th look into historical FBI files, and to celebrate they've also compiled a timeline of the FBI's history. It traces the rise and fall of J. Edgar Hoover as well as some of the Bureau's more questionable investigations into famous figures ranging from Steve Jobs to Hannah Arendt. Read the timeline, or browse through all of MuckRock's FBI FOIA work.
The FBI interviewed 29 people about Steve Jobs (after he was appointed to the President's Export Council in 1991), with several citing his "past drug use," and several individuals also saying Jobs would "distort reality."
The FBI interviewed 29 people about Steve Jobs (after he was appointed to the President's Export Council in 1991), with several citing his "past drug use," and several individuals also saying Jobs would "distort reality."
They're on everybody else's!
Can't tell if that's a unicode bug, or if Trump is going to trademark "President" and start charging royalties.
And yet FBI didn't bother to read Trumps stuff? And he can just go into the whitehouse, take control of the executive branch and he hasn't even put his assets into a blind trust (not that Trump Casino Panama or any 'Trump' branded property could ever be 'blind'ly held)!
Go read:
1. The accounts he's disclosed as part of tax disputes (real).
2. The accounts he's disclosed as required by foreign laws (e.g. UK Companies house), also real.
3. The partial reveal of company borrowing in his Election Disclosure Filing (borrowing from banks will be real, but the earnings numbers are lies).
4. Search the names of his foreign coinvestors, and read their ad-hoc claims of investments in Trump 'properties'.
5. Pull the revPar numbers for similar properties to get an idea of he true (non-Trump-lying) revenue.
You quickly find out that Trump co, is a Madoff style ponzi scheme.
Even a little common sense tells you the problem. e.g. he borrows yet another $19 million against Trump National Doral last year.
His attorney when fighting a tax demand says the property is worth only $75 million. A highest estimate puts it at $96 million.
His borrowing against it is $125 million (1.6x the actual value his own legal team claim!).
HE BROKE AND OVERMORTGAGED.
The income claimed in his election filing for that is ridiculous 10x the actual RevPAR of similar golf resorts (i.e. a lie).
So the mortgage profit is bigger than the real profit.
IF HE HAD MONEY HE'D LEND IT TO HIMSELF. SO HE'S BROKE.
Most of his properties have issues, if he sold them at best price, paid off his total borrowing, he'd be very very bankrupt, and there would be a lot of outside investors whose assets had been used as capital against unrelated properties.
He needs to keep pulling in new investors and making new projects to fund the debts on the previous projects. And he needs to do it in secret so the investors don't see where their money flows.
They can't, because the biggest foreign threat is about to become their boss.
You are welcome on my lawn.
The FBI are a bunch of clowns. It's history is littered with investigations that arise simply from misunderstanding the culture of the time. Perhaps others arise from jealousy of intelligent and knowledgeable people.
Unfortunately, the FBI is very dangerous: it has weapons that can be used to destroy people's lives.
And then we have the fact that Hoover used the FBI to help Reagan get elected and then, this year, Comey provided the final push to get Trump elected.
The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
They said i distorted reality a lot...
I wonder if anyone has considered that the FBI forced Richard Nixon to resign by feeding reporters information anonymously. "Deep Throat", it turns out, was the assistant FBI director. That rather important piece of information was kept from the public for almost 50 years. Long enough that a movie got made that portrayed Woodward and Bernstein as heroic reporters instead of pawns of the FBI. Why were they investigating Steve Jobs at all/ The answer is to get whatever dirt they could collect in case he ever posed a threat to their political agenda. The reality is the FBI has always been an authoritarian political organization.
With our current President-erect's publicly stated attitudes, do you think the FBI's investigative powers will grow or shrink over the next four to eight years? What, with that pesky ACLU and its [redacted] lawyers put in their place, I suspect the FBI will be more than busy enough to justify any budget increase they may need to keep us safe.
To rephrase: if the FBI isn't the premier law enforcement agency we would desire, it'll be more effective to improve them than it is to replace them - and regardless of their blunders, we really can't do without them.
Trump does use mortgages and other forms of "other people's money" to build things. Heck, the owners of the Empire State Building GAVE him a 50% interest, gave him half the building, in exchange for nothing but his promise to use his knowledge and experience make it more profitable.
Forbes magazine has been doing the math on Trump's net worth (assets minus liabilities) for 35 years. As you may know, they do a list of wealthiest people very year, and they've gotten reasonably good at it. According to Forbes, Trump's net worth, the value of his assets minus what he owes, is $3.7 billion.
http://www.forbes.com/donald-t...
Steve jobs lie !!!
Never...
And they pulled out all the stops to get him there.
Who, pray tell?
Queen Elizabeth II.
Shhhh. They don't know how capitalism works or that you can start a business, get funding, and not be liable if it goes bankrupt. Or that you might have to start 10 businesses to find one that works, though of course the odds are better for people who have been successful before, who know what they're doing and who have connections.
They hear 'bankruptcy' and don't know if it's chapter 7 or 11, or maybe they assume that some personal bankruptcy they know of is relevant. They see $10 million dollar failures and ignore $1 billion dollar successes and they have no idea how many of one it takes to hit another, nor how investors expect a lot of businesses to fail or otherwise not return. And they certainly don't get why some investors would actually prefer that you went under rather than being only moderately successful. To be honest, that one is pretty hard to understand, but it's definitely true and it has quite a bit to do with their business model, but I digress.
The thing is, he runs real businesses. And yeah, any business of a certain size will have random lawsuits, etc. to deal with. He's not running a 'charity' foundation that pays for his daughter's wedding and gets all kinds of funds from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, nor do they play that game where they recycle the same donation money around in circles, skimming off their administration fees without actually doing much of anything. Just ask Haiti about that one...
I bet you don't get his 'joke' at the dinner about that, though. I put joke in quotes because it wasn't funny. It wasn't supposed to be, either. It'll be important later. You just haven't caught up yet.
The FBI thought that Steve Jobs had taken drugs that altered other people's perception of reality? Have I woken up in a Philip K Dick story?
There was a time that some of felt we weren't doing anything worthwhile unless the FBI had a file on us. We were young and stupid, but that didn't make us wrong.
Nice political stab but you almost got to the truth anyway. The real threats to this country are the rich and megacorporations, and of course the FBI spends zero time with either unless of course they happen to be the victim of a crime. In those cases the FBI is all over stuff that would be ignored if it happened to any of us.
They are a rouge political organization.
https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
You idiot. We don't need Hillary to be corrupt any more, Trump won the election. Can't you keep the party line straight from one day to the next?
Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.