Slashdot Mirror


Google's Free Wi-Fi in India Now Live in 100 Railway Stations; 15,000 New Users Connect to Web Everyday (mashable.com)

Last year, Google CEO Sundar Pichai announced the company will be bringing free Wi-Fi to 100 railway stations in India by the end of 2016. The company began, what was the "the largest public Wi-Fi project in the world", in India earlier this year. Today, it announced its free Wi-Fi has reached 100th Indian railway station in the country. From a report: Google announced Thursday its free Wi-Fi is now working at the 100 busiest railway stations in India. Over five million people in the country latch onto Google's free internet service every month, with 15,000 of them accessing the internet for the first time in their lives every day, the company said. The growth of what Google described as "the largest public Wi-Fi project in the world" is in line with company's expectations. Interestingly, Google has partnered with Indian government-run RailTel ISP for free internet service, and it lets users access as much data as they want and visit whichever website they would like. This is in contrast to Facebook's Free Basics, which offered Indians access to select websites. The Indian government earlier this year banned Free Basics on the grounds of net neutrality. Nobody in India has an issue with Google's approach.

46 comments

  1. Every -space- day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't "everyday" an adjective? I think it should be "every day" in the headline.

  2. the services are easy to differentiate. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    facebook free basics: HELLO FOREIGN BROWN PEOPLE! we hear youre excited about THE AMERICAN INTENET. well we made an internet FOR YOU. LOG ON and then SURF 5 sites just like a REAL AMERICAN PERSON. SURFING IS WHAT AMERICANS DO. do you UN-DER-STAND?
    Google free internet: heres internet, brought to you by a familiar provider. its free. use as much as you want. peace out.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:the services are easy to differentiate. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      while charging America 100/month.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    2. Re:the services are easy to differentiate. by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      BTW, it is not foreign brown ppl. That is where the new google CEO is from. He is simply shutting down projects in America and transferring them to India.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    3. Re:the services are easy to differentiate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      facebook free basics: "We only benefit when you go to sites we influence or outright control"

      Google free internet: "We benefit pretty much wherever you go on the internet."

    4. Re:the services are easy to differentiate. by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Google: Hi, Indian government, we'd like to partner w/ you to provide free internet to people at railway stations

      Facebook: Hi, Indian government, we'd like to provide some internet for free to people

    5. Re:the services are easy to differentiate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sad (and racist) but true...

    6. Re:the services are easy to differentiate. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      racists? nope. Nationalistic? ABSOLUTELY.
      Everybody expects America to NOT be nationalistic, while we are the LEAST nationalistic, with the most open borders.
      It is killing us.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re: the services are easy to differentiate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Nothing wrong with being an advocate for your own kind, when the alternative is people who shot in the street.

    8. Re: the services are easy to differentiate. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      advocate for your kind? What exactly is our 'kind'? If you mean for Americans, esp. considering that we funded them, then yeah.
      OTOH, if you are like Bill O'Reilly and this is about keep whites supremacy, then nope.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  3. "Free" | "You keep using that word..." by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> Google has partnered with Indian government-run RailTel ISP for free internet service

    "Free" for...the users, sure (assuming ticket prices remain constant and there aren't any "station fees" or the like), but who's paying who for what in the "partnership?"

    1. Re:"Free" | "You keep using that word..." by fbobraga · · Score: 1

      "Free" for...the users, sure (assuming ticket prices remain constant and there aren't any "station fees" or the like), but who's paying who for what in the "partnership?"

      You are confusing "free" with "gratis", don't you?

    2. Re:"Free" | "You keep using that word..." by unixisc · · Score: 1

      'Gratis' is pretty much the standard meaning of 'free'. Only in Dick Stallman's Utopian world does it mean something beyond altruistic

    3. Re:"Free" | "You keep using that word..." by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Not really. In English, one word has two meanings. In French, they have two distinct words, libre and gratuit for the speech and beer contexts.

      This is a rare example of the amphibian chompers actually getting something right.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:"Free" | "You keep using that word..." by unixisc · · Score: 1

      In English, one could use the term 'liberated' to describe software of the type that Stallman was describing, and it would be perfectly accurate. Reason he doesn't is that that word is also associated w/ Marxist, which he doesn't want associated w/ it, even though he is normally a Green Party supporter

    5. Re:"Free" | "You keep using that word..." by red+crab · · Score: 1

      The interesting point to note here is that RailTel is already an telecom/ISP company that has existed for decades, connecting all Indian Railways offices and stations, open only to railway employees though. As a search giant and software services provider, what technical expertise exactly Google is providing here, is not clear.

  4. 100 stations sounds impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until you realize that India probably has more than 2500 train stations total, and they're only getting 150 users daily at each station currently.

    1. Re:100 stations sounds impressive by unixisc · · Score: 1

      And that gives you an idea of the growth potential for this project

    2. Re:100 stations sounds impressive by johannesg · · Score: 1

      How are they making money though? And, given that it is Google, what will happen when they unexpectedly close the project, 2-3 years from now?

      (still angry about them dropping Picasa!)

  5. oh good; kill projects like google fiber by WindBourne · · Score: 3

    but extend free wifi in his native India, along with sending most job openings to India.
    Way to go google.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by The-Ixian · · Score: 0

      Google is a global company. Why is any country more deserving than another as recipients of Google's projects?

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by NG+Resonance · · Score: 2

      Google Inc. is not a "global company." It is a Delaware corporation with headquarters in Mountain View, CA.

    3. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd like to know how successful a "global" company like Google would be without the political weight of the American economy, diplomacy and ultimately, military behind it.

      Google owes its success globally to the extent that it can count on the American government to back it up overseas, otherwise it would be just another listening post and censorship arm of a bunch of third world kleptocracies and dictatorships.

    4. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      but extend free wifi in his native India, along with sending most job openings to India.
      Way to go google.

      India is welcoming them with open arms. Trying to get legal permission to install fiber and give people in the USA decent internet service is an uphill battle. Where do you suggest they should spend their effort? I suspect that they'll get more out of putting their energy someplace that welcomes their input.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose the likes of Shell, BP, Toyota, Honda, Nissan, Daimler, Volkswagen, BMW, Samsung, Sony, Mitsubishi, AXA, Allianz etc could never have succeeded without America either. And all those massive Chinese companies, but I'm guessing the world's largest economy is just a "third world kleptocracy" to you.

      Good lord man, is Trump your long lost father-figure? Or do you just like the American stereotypes?

    6. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by WindBourne · · Score: 2

      actually, local gov are BEGGING Google. The issue is that the GOP at the state and national levels are fighting it for their fascist friends.
      However, the google fiber is a money maker, while the indian wifi is a free give-away. BIG DIFFERENCE.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    7. Re:oh good; kill projects like google fiber by swb · · Score: 1

      Tell me about the Chinese Internet firms that aren't tapped and wired by the Chinese government. Tell me about the African or any other third world Internet companies of any scale. And no, the Indian railways Internet company doesn't count, either, no matter how many zillions of poor Indians use it.

      Nearly all the other companies you list have benefited greatly from either access to the American market or from the Pax Americana that guarantees their freedom to operate, and I would wager nearly all of them either appeal directly to the American government through their US subsidiaries or indirectly through their own local governments' diplomatic relationships with the Americans.

      In the case of Google specifically, a large measure of its success is that it it is an American company. You're kidding yourself if you think of it as a "global" company -- it is an American company with a global reach, and that global reach is due in large part to the fact that it is American.

  6. hmmm.. whichever website you say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  7. I think you mean "every day" by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    "Every day" means each 24-hour rotation of the globe.
    "Everyday" means mediocre.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:I think you mean "every day" by neo-mkrey · · Score: 1

      Every day is 23 hours, 56 minutes and 4 seconds.

    2. Re:I think you mean "every day" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and 4.1 seconds, since we're pedants.

  8. no, it sounds impressive regardless, you fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how many free wifi stations have YOU opened recently?

    jesus christ, some fucking people...

  9. fuck your dirty face, a haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    fuck your dirty face
    with fifteen rusty old spoons
    you raw shit burglar

  10. the real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap labor in India can now log on to the internet.

  11. ... like flies to shit ... by swell · · Score: 1

    My city has a lovely central park and mild weather all year 'round. Our park is populated with museums, exotic plants, colorful buskers entertaining visitors from around the world, and free wifi.

    We also have lots of homeless people. They swarm to the park with their cell phones and chargers to enjoy YooToob and other amusements. There is an uncomfortable discrepancy between the wealthy visitors and the local homeless. We don't quite know how to reconcile that.

    India may also see a shift in the mobile population toward train stations and other sources of free internet. Their large population moving in synchrony could tilt the polar axis.

    --
    ...omphaloskepsis often...
  12. How do they handle security/identity? by yelvington · · Score: 1

    When I was in India several years ago, it was not possible to get onto the Internet without proof of identity. In order to use a computer at a cyber cafe, I had to provide my passport, whose number was duly recorded in a register along with the beginning and ending times of my session. Considering the terrorism attacks since then, I would expect that practice to continue.

    So how is the Google/RailTel access handled? Do people have to provide proof of identity to establish an account? Is it actually open? Encrypted?

    1. Re:How do they handle security/identity? by yes-but-no · · Score: 1

      Seems it first takes you to a webpage where you provide your mobile number. You get a OTP (a pin, say 8 digits, One Time Passcode) on your mobile which you enter to continue; So basically they can track you by your mobile#.

  13. 15,000 by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Coincidentally, 15,000 is the number of passengers on the roof of each train.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  14. Indian Rail priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest problem Indian Railways face is damage to ties & corrosion of rails due to open defecation.
    http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/indian-rail-is-worlds-largest-open-toilet-jairam-ramesh-494434
    And yet they have resources for Wifi? What's wrong with this picture?

    1. Re: Indian Rail priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a cultural thing, like how Americans use eating utensils and toilet paper and wash using clean water.

  15. "Nobody in India" -- oh, really? by jbn-o · · Score: 2

    Nobody in India has an issue with Google's approach.

    That's an extraordinary claim. This requires extraordinary evidence. I doubt you have the evidence to stand behind this. You presented no evidence of this. It reads as if you're saying there are no Indians who understand that it is in Google's interest to continue to offer gratis services which feed a business model built in part on spying thus making their network service a trap.

    1. Re:"Nobody in India" -- oh, really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about

      Nobody in India has read and fully comprehends Google's "privacy" policy.

  16. I hate to be the one to say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...But I, personally, deeply dislike this trend of providing easy internet access to large swathes of people from the third world without any thought as to how it might impact the rest of the world.

    I don't hate brown people, nor do I hate poor people, but what I do hate is the fact that, as time has gone on, I have consistently seen more and more attempted attacks against the various companies I've worked with originate from these impoverished countries.

    Call me a racist, classist, white middle class male all you like, just keep in mind I'm also a realist - these countries feature a major portion of their population that lack access proper sanitation, clean drinking facilities, sustainable food crops and education facilities, it stands to reason that if you give them free internet they're going to use it to download easy-to-use, prebuilt tools to perform low risk, low skill hit-and-run attacks against others in the hopes of scraping together enough money to put food on the table for another week.

    If Google legitimately wanted to help these people, they'd take their wifi budget and put it towards agriculture or waste management instead. Naturally, Google DOESN'T want to help the people of India, all they want are more eyes viewing youtube ads and more disposable code jockeys to farm American jobs out to.

    The internet is great, but for god sake, clean water and public streets free of human excrement are more important matters.

    1. Re:I hate to be the one to say this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can always block the country netblocks. What is not so easy to deal with is the amount of noise ratio people from those countries create on foruns, begging people to do their classwork, or to teach them how to do their work in a very broken English.
      It is quite mind numbing.

  17. This is not free. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are paying your privacy and right to allow Google to read your information.