Slashdot Mirror


Amazon's Robot Workforce Grows By 50 Percent In Just One Year (siliconrepublic.com)

Amazon hires a lot of people. But the expansion of its army of orange-wheeled robots is more than keeping pace. An anonymous reader writes: E-commerce and cloud giant Amazon has revealed that it now has 45,000 robots across 20 fulfilment centres around the world. This is a 50 percent increase on the same time last year, when the company said that it employed 30,000 robots alongside its 306,000 people. Amazon uses the robots to automate the picking and packing process at large warehouses. The robots are 16in tall and weigh 145kg. They can travel at 5mph and can carry packages that weigh 317kg. The robots became part of the company's workforce when Amazon acquired Kiva Systems in 2012 for $775m.

49 comments

  1. correction from the article. by nimbius · · Score: 4, Funny

    The robots became part of the company's workforce when Amazon acquired Kiva Systems in 2012 for $775m.

    the specifications for the robots are not correct at all. these machines weigh slightly more than 340 kilograms, can travel at up to 60 miles per hour, do not feel hunger, sorrow, or pain, and are all equipped with a phased plasma rifle typically in the 40 watt range.

    regards,
    Kiva_prod_32423.aws.amazon.com
    A regular human worker employee.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:correction from the article. by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that, at least by default, they are toggled to the "don't kill all humans" setting.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    2. Re:correction from the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So amazon hired Dalek's to work in their warehouses?

    3. Re:correction from the article. by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      doesn't feel pity, remorse or fear, and absolutely will not stop... ever, until you are unemployed!

    4. Re:correction from the article. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      The robots are 16in tall and weigh 145kg.

      the specifications for the robots are not correct at all. these machines weigh slightly more than 340 kilograms

      They probably started hiring American robots...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:correction from the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention that, at least by default, they are toggled to the "don't kill all humans" setting.

      The problem is they hired the cheapest programmers they could find in India and between when the specs where developed and the programmers got them that setting got changed to "kill all humans". You get what you pay for when you just base quality of the programmers on how little they cost.

    6. Re:correction from the article. by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that, at least by default, they are toggled to the "don't kill all humans" setting.

      The problem is they hired the cheapest programmers they could find in India and between when the specs where developed and the programmers got them that setting got changed to "kill all humans". You get what you pay for when you just base quality of the programmers on how little they cost.

      I am just waiting for a disgruntle coder to slip in "take a chance" in their programming...

      --
      ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
    7. Re:correction from the article. by INT_QRK · · Score: 2

      You also forgot to mention that they steal old people's pills, which concerns me as I'm not getting any younger, and they're all over the lawn. Get off.

    8. Re: correction from the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The problem is they hired the cheapest programmers they could find in India".

      Shame they didn't fork out for high quality Russian or Israeli programmers. Even below average US programmers would have been an improvement however they tend to be far worse at maths that the Indians.

    9. Re:correction from the article. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention that, at least by default, they are toggled to the "don't kill all humans" setting.

      Oh, wait, you wanted That setting?

      Um.

      Sorry.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    10. Re:correction from the article. by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      They probably started hiring American robots...

      You can tell they're American because they have US flag decals on them

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    11. Re:correction from the article. by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      I'd like a gruntled coder.

    12. Re:correction from the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So amazon hired Dalek's to work in their warehouses?

      No, the TSA made them a better offer. Coming soon to your local USA airports, bus, and railway stations.

      Rumour has it that Amazon have contracted with CyberCorp to "upgrade" their human employees, however.

    13. Re:correction from the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably started hiring American robots...

      You can tell they're American because they have US flag decals on them

      And heavy armaments.

    14. Re:correction from the article. by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 1

      Bearing in mind that the word Robot is derived from the Czech robota meaning Forced Labour or Slave I think Amazon have been using robots from the word go

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    15. Re:correction from the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was a mistake in the switch design, so it's either "kill all humans" or "kill some humans".

  2. Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by presidenteloco · · Score: 3, Funny

    Robots that make things connected to drones that deliver things, all run by a computer algorithm in the cloud that no single human understands.

    What could possibly go wrong?

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just for grins and giggles, they should name the drone delivery system "Skynet"!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free stuff for hackers?
      Sounds like a winning plan.

    3. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

      No one has the cash to buy anything after being put out of work. Or the taxes get very high when people start turning to the er / jail / prison as there doctor.

    4. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by jezwel · · Score: 1

      No one has the cash to buy anything after being put out of work. Or the taxes get very high when people start turning to the er / jail / prison as there doctor.

      Thus why lowering corporate tax rates are ridiculous - personal income is going to be slashed by automation, so where will governments get their income from if corporate rates are dropped?

    5. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one has the cash to buy anything after being put out of work. Or the taxes get very high when people start turning to the er / jail / prison as there doctor.

      Thus why lowering corporate tax rates are ridiculous - personal income is going to be slashed by automation, so where will governments get their income from if corporate rates are dropped?

      Republicans never seemed to particularly like to deal with reality. I just talked to one that was whining those people don't want to pay for birth control. It's not fair.. I don't want to pay for half the crap the government does. They take it anyway. I also pointed out that the birth control prevents abortions. He utterly ignored that.

      More specifically to your point wealth inequality is _Increasing_ . link so what do they do but step on the gas and make it far worse.. Your right automation is likely to reduce the jobs that exist and given the republican attitude about the takers, which is what they call poor people, well I have no idea what is going to happen to them.

      The math just doesn't make sense.

    6. Re: Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The world would be a better place if you both shut the fuck up.

    7. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What could possibly go wrong?

      Your delivery, presumably.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    8. Re:Is it just me to worry about the new Amazon? by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later, someone will find out that long ago, the Amazon headquarters were flooded with a deadly neurotoxin, leaving none alive.

  3. Don't worry, Trump will deport them by fodder69 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Send those suckers back to China where they were probably made and give those jobs back to American robots.

    1. Re:Don't worry, Trump will deport them by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Corporations and robots are people and will be able to vote soon.

      See, Trump is creating jobs.

    2. Re:Don't worry, Trump will deport them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Equal rights for robots! Suck it, you fleshist!!!

  4. Posting anonymously for obvious reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the Health Care industry. Ransomware authors should really be targeting Amazon.

    I know corporations love automation, because, as they say, "Robots never need to eat, sleep, or pee". But they're putting all their eggs into one digital basket. If someone figures out how to take that system hostage...well, in Amazon's case, doing the math, it works out to be about four million dollars for every minute of downtime. A ransomware author could easily demand ten million dollars, and they'd get it.

  5. Bloody order of magnitude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I meant four thousand dollars per minute of downtime, not four million.

    So, I suppose they could demand a million easily. Still, when you compare that to the pidly $17,000 payout made by Hollywood Presbyterian Hospital, it's the difference between a bank heist and a purse snatch.

  6. Robots by ardmhacha · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our new robot overlords

  7. Perhaps this explains... by TheSouthernDandy · · Score: 1

    ...the DVD I received rattling around in the refrigerator-sized shipping box. Insufficient training data on how to ship DVDs to Luddites mistrustful of streaming services.

  8. This is only a temporary phenomenon. by ffkom · · Score: 1

    Once the (by then unemployed) ex-customers cannot afford to buy stuff online anymore, they will be re-hired by Amazon to slave away distributing products to the (by then ruling class of) robots, who'll enjoy being serviced by the puny carbon units.

  9. Our company as well by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    We had 2 robots, now we have 3, a 50% majoration.

  10. Meh, plenty of people understand it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they make about $150-$300k/yr. Now, the folks who _own_ it all, they don't understand squat. But they don't need to. The ruling class just has to rule.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  11. Not necessarily by rsilvergun · · Score: 3, Insightful

    there's a third dystopia nobody likes to talk about, where the masses are simply left to starve to death while the entire world's resources are claimed by the 1%. I mean, if they have robots to make everything and the control access to food/shelter/health care/etc then why bother with employees? What the hell difference does it make if somebody buys your crap when you already own everything? The few of them you want for cooking food/doctors/engineers/military/sex workers/ will do as you say or they'll starve to death. And your robot guns will cut them down if they try to rebel.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our fleshy 1% overlords.

    2. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's a third dystopia nobody likes to talk about, where the masses are simply left to starve to death while the entire world's resources are claimed by the 1%. I mean, if they have robots to make everything and the control access to food/shelter/health care/etc then why bother with employees? What the hell difference does it make if somebody buys your crap when you already own everything? The few of them you want for cooking food/doctors/engineers/military/sex workers/ will do as you say or they'll starve to death. And your robot guns will cut them down if they try to rebel.

      Plenty of people are talking about it, considering it's the current path we're traveling. The problem is the average person doesn't even understand the idea. They can't even fathom a world where they aren't needed when it's just around the corner. They're so focused on protecting their jobs that will still go away and spitting in the face of social services to see the writing on the wall. I love hearing people in trucking, taxis, food service, manufacturing, farming etc... bitch about all these entitled people wanting free education when in 10-20 years they're going to be completely uneducated and useless in the modern world BEGGING for work and the education they need to not be worthless. There are very dark times ahead for 10's of millions of Americans. The very same Americans who are pissing in the face of the people automating away their jobs and truly trying to protect them from themselves. But we're going to make America great again, so they can take comfort in that.

  12. Did you even RTFS? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    they had 15 THOUSAND and now have 30 THOUSAND. That's a major production. It's also at least 15 thousand new employees they didn't need to hire (give or take an engineer or two). So, what are you gonna do when the world _doesn't_ need ditch diggers? If you're lucky you'll live in the walled cities where robot gun emplacements protect you. If you're not one of them will cut your throat for a half day's worth of food. And if you think the 1% need you: get over yourself. If you're posting on /. you're not one of the movers and shakers in IT. They've got better things to be doing. You're the same as me, and above average techy. They're gunning for all of us.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Did you even RTFS? by m0hawk · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite sure you go the parents joke there buddy.

      I did enjoy reading your dystopian rant though.

    2. Re:Did you even RTFS? by fl_litig8r · · Score: 1

      It's also at least 15 thousand new employees they didn't need to hire (give or take an engineer or two)

      But that's really not true. The robots don't eliminate the need for human employees.They just carry the pods (four-sided metal and fabric shelves) to the stowers and pickers, who are still people. So whereas these people used to have to traverse a giant warehouse of shelves to stow and pick merchandise, now they just stand in one spot and the shelves come to them. Which would you prefer, as an employee? I'd rather Amazon create fewer less shitty jobs using robots (and it's not a 1 for 1 reduction in jobs per robot, anyway) than more shitty jobs that make people walk miles every shift.

    3. Re:Did you even RTFS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the overall condition of the average American, they could do with more jobs that involve walking around all day, not fewer.

      And what's so special about being a person that the merchandise is delivered to? What makes that a job that requires a human? Picking the right size box? An algorithm can do that. Packing it? There are ways to automate that as well. Surely not sticking a label on them. Quality inspection? Nope. With automated manufacturing processes, you can get the overall product quality to the level that the occasional bad-at-warehouse item can be folded into the general returned merchandise process.

      You can bet that those jobs are also under consideration as well.

  13. No human workforce = no customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where will the humans on this planet get money to buy the stuff from companies with a robot workforce? If companies feel cheaper workforce is the answer, imagine the impact on the economy. People need cash to buy stuff.

    1. Re:No human workforce = no customers by trevc · · Score: 1

      Good point - I bet nobody has thought about that! I think you are on to something....

  14. Robots will receive basic income? by fbobraga · · Score: 1

    Only humans will receive that, to help with unemployment generated by automation. An "automation tax", like social security taxes, seems very welcome to me (by help on funding this social security spend) - just saying, IMHO

  15. 317 kg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    317 kg? Really? Are you sure it isn't 318 kg? Because 700 lb is about 317.515 kg. Do we now have political correctness for units?

    Reminds me of a story told me by a formerly Austalian roboticist. When Australia switched from English to metric, signs that said "10 miles ahead" weren't moved, they were just changed to "16.1 km ahead."

  16. I said nobody _likes_ to talk about it by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I started noticing a phenomenon about 3 years ago I'll call the "Millennial Effect". There would be dozens of articles trying to figure out why Millennials weren't doing the sorts of things their parents did (buy new cars, eat out, buy houses, have kids). Every possible explanation was given except money. Recently I've seen the left wing press finally start talking about it, but only the very, very left wing (think Mother Jones & Al Jezeera). Even MSNBC seldom if ever touches on just how much ground the Millennials have lost.

    It's all about wealth inequality. But the mass media is owned by billionaires, so you shouldn't be surprised when they don't bite the hand that feeds them.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/