Slashdot Mirror


Arizona Plans To Sue Theranos Over Faulty Blood Tests (techcrunch.com)

An anonymous reader shares a TechCrunch report: The Arizona attorney general is soliciting outside legal counsel to pursue a consumer fraud lawsuit against the beleaguered blood testing startup Theranos, according to a document posted on the state's procurement website. AZ's AG has so far declined to comment on any action, but the document contends Theranos may have defrauded customers in the state and the office is now seeking proposals to assist it in possible legal action "against Theranos, Inc. and its closely related subsidiaries for violations of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act arising out of Theranos Inc.'s long-running scheme of deceptive acts and misrepresentations relating to the capabilities and operation of Theranos blood testing equipment." Theranos ran its consumer portion of the business in Arizona and even worked with the state government to change laws allowing consumers to request blood tests without a doctor's permission. But, as the document cites, a myriad bad test results, including those raised in a series of Wall street Journal articles, raised concerns with the attorney general's office.

31 comments

  1. It is not "a myriad" by al0ha · · Score: 1, Informative

    It is myriad - as in myriad bad test results, not a myriad bad test results; didn't you pay attention in skool?

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    1. Re:It is not "a myriad" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they meant a myrinet?

    2. Re:It is not "a myriad" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aww, you so sad. *pats head* have a crayon :)

  2. Accidentally a word by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

    It is myriad - as in myriad bad test results, not a myriad bad test results; didn't you pay attention in skool?

    Really what happened was the time honored tradition of slashdot posts leaving out words in the article/title. In this particular case the phrase was probably supposed to be "a myriad of bad test results".

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  3. Gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who tests blood using a thermos?!? We drink from those!

    1. Re: Gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why we put it in the thermos.

      -Vlad

    2. Re: Gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      I keep pee in mine.

      -Trump

    3. Re: Gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep semen in mine. I jerk off homeless men and steal it from sperm banks. Then I freeze it in the freezer in glass christmas tree ornaments and in the summer my family has cum ball fights.

      - Hillary

    4. Re: Gross! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go away 4chan nobody likes you

  4. A bit late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... including those raised in a series of Wall street Journal articles ...

    Since Theranos has essentially shut its doors, the AG isn't saving anybody. There's probably few assets in the company, so a fine will dissolve the company and leave the DoJ empty-handed.

    1. Re:A bit late by gravewax · · Score: 2

      Not really. Theranos is still running (it should be shut down). But even if it was you still need to prosecute/take legal action to ensure the dodgy directors and especially holmes etc are at the very least barred from running future ventures legally otherwise they would just move onto the next scam and rake in millions from more suckers as they would just claim "it was all just a beat up in the press, we were never charged with any crime or sued for any wrongdoing therefore we must be innocent".

  5. Direct to consumer is a separate issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theranos ran its consumer portion of the business in Arizona and even worked with the state government to change laws allowing consumers to request blood tests without a doctor's permission.

    The two key things that Americans are supposed to have in common are a love of freedom and a love of democracy. By democracy I mean government of, by, and for the (ordinary) people. But it's individual freedom that's relevant here.

    From what I can tell, the top management at Theranos were so devoid of integrity that one might even suspect some serious mental illness. And, of course, the Theranos employees were credulously drinking the company Kool-Aid.

    But that's an entirely separate issue from whether I, as a freedom loving American, should be free to spend my own money as I see fit - even on medical tests that may not be strictly necessary. As long as the (physical) risk of those tests is relatively low, it's basically a freedom of speech issue. If I want to pay someone for their opinion then that's my business. The federal government shouldn't suppress the expression of that opinion.

    That's not to say that the government should have no role in preventing fraud. If a company claims to provide accurate medical tests then government oversight to insure that they do is fine. But that's entirely separate from the question of whether only medical doctors should be allowed to order (non-invasive) medical tests.

    1. Re: Direct to consumer is a separate issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your missunderstanding of a diagnosis raises my taxes because you respond like an idiot, then I say we keep you on life support and pay you 50 cents a liter until all your bills are paid.

    2. Re:Direct to consumer is a separate issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when it comes to medicine people aren't treating answers as opinions and they are making serious life choices based on these "opinions" which most definitely DO burden the rest of society with huge costs. If you are willing to happily die because you believed a wrong opinion then fine but the people that get these wrong opinions will spread diseases, turn up in emergency wards expecting help because they were incorrectly diagnosed etc, they won't sit at home and just die quietly because "oh well my fault I trusted the wrong opinion". If theranos advised their service as "hey will take a guess at whether you are sick, our tests are questionable and most likely incorrect but you are welcome to our opinion" then fine.

  6. elizabeth holmes should be in jail by hsmith · · Score: 1

    She blatantly endangered lives with Silicon Valley bullshit fake tests. It is criminal that she isn't rotting in a jail cell for fake test results.

    1. Re: elizabeth holmes should be in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She can't go to jail because they won't let you wear turtlenecks there.

    2. Re:elizabeth holmes should be in jail by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It depends whether she knew they were bullshit fake tests or she was really bad at sciencing*

      *Not a word, but there needs to be a way to describe people who fail at experimental design/running experiments/after the fact statistics.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:elizabeth holmes should be in jail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about all the fawning enablers that made her what she was?

  7. Took long enough by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's been known for years Theranos is nothing but a scam. They have never allowed anyone to try and replicate their results, have never submitted their tests to government scrutiny, have never done anything to show their tests do what they claim they do.

    It's a bit late for Arizona to be suing the company now, right when it's about to go bankrupt. At least go after Holmes for the fraud she's been perpetuating all this time because there's little left of the company.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Took long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Step 1 is to show the company was a scam, then people like Holmes are much easier to prosecute.

    2. Re: Took long enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't prosecute her, she's transgender.

  8. If Arizona sues... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They will keep all the money, the "consumers" won't see a dime.

  9. Re:Will the Theranos suit divert resources? by sexconker · · Score: 1

    Fake post about real articles about fake laws?

  10. Re: Will the Theranos suit divert resources? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why Elizabeth doesn't live in Arizona. She uses hree at a time.

  11. Look out! by bonedonut · · Score: 1

    Once he gets all the infinity stones, Arizona is toast!

  12. PrettySuccessful by sdinfoserv · · Score: 1

    This entire scam stems from Americans obsession with pretty, youthful, success. The US was so busy idolizing Holmes, nobody stopped and asked if it was real. Somewhere along the line we gave up critical thinking skills.

  13. Re:Will the Theranos suit divert resources? by DickBreath · · Score: 1

    The post is quite real. The Arizona law is also quite real. Using Google you can find many more sources than the three citations I provided.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.