Slashdot Mirror


China Cracks Down On International VPN Usage (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader writes: China's government has announced a 14-month crackdown on the use of unauthorised Virtual Private Networks (VPNs), commonly used by visitors and native activists, amongst others, to communicate with the world beyond the Great Firewall of China. Sunday's announcement [Chinese] from the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology reiterated regulations first outlined in 2002, but which have since been subject to sparse, selective or lenient enforcement. The new announcement promises a 'clean up' regarding the VPN situation in China, beginning immediately and running until March of 2018.

68 comments

  1. So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Guess we'll have to switch to SSH and HTTPS tunnels instead of brazenly using IPSec and OpenVPN. Got the message loud and clear. :D

  2. OpenVPN port tcp/443 by jawtheshark · · Score: 2

    OpenVPN port tcp/443. How are you going to stop that? I have one of those for... reasons, I keep bandwidth usage low to avoid volume based detectors.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    1. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that some deep packet inspection methods can determine if potentially encrypted data is being passed through a filter. Obviously it's going to be error prone, but what does that matter when the general plan is to sufficiently inconvenience people so they don't even try. I doubt the PRC cares that maybe the odd innocent bystander's data gets hit as a false positive.

      As a counter to that, I have read of encryption schemes that will bypass this kind of filtering, but it's going to be a lot slower as a lot more junk data has to be thrown in to fool detection. Good for low-bandwidth needs like passing text-based emails and the like, but not much good for anything high bandwidth like voice communications.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's actually not all that difficult to spot vpn traffic. Run some DPI and just simply look at the size of the packets being exchanged. L2TP/IPSEC/etc will all have very regular size exchanges that virtually uniquely identify them. Doesn't matter how you encrypt or tunnel it if you don't change the payload sizes.

      It's like saying "You can't block my bittorrent client if I just change my port!" Actually, yes we can. And we do. Quiet easily actually.

      I haven't looked closely into TOR to see if it pads with random size data, (betting they DO) but that's what they need to do with vpn to seriously defend against traffic analysis.

      Even with that, it's still not bulletproof, but it dramatically increases the work and false positives on the detection side of the fence.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    3. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      It's actually not all that difficult to spot vpn traffic. Run some DPI and just simply look at the size of the packets being exchanged.

      You are talking simple in THEORY, but not in practice. We're talking about sniffing the traffic of a COUNTRY, not a small office. That takes serious hardware and serious money if they don't want to crawl. Sounds like they are ready to turn on some system. But like all things internet, it will only take a short time for people to learn how to get around it.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    4. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How are you going to stop that?

      Trivially? That is actually dead simple to detect and block, genius. Your DPI just has to presumes that the only thing on 443 should be SSL.

      You would have to obfuscate your packets in some way (e.g. padding/splitting them prior to encryption, and then embedding them in SSL traffic). Vanilla OpenVPN does not do this. OpenVPN over stunnel gets you a little closer, but not all the way, IMHO. Even once you do that, statistical analysis of sources and destinations alone (e.g. normal users don't have a ton of "valid" SSL to a single endpoint) will still betray the likelihood that you are using a VPN (which is fine in a western democracy, but really bad juju in a place like China during a crackdown)

    5. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that; last I checked OpenVPN doesn't even try to hide the nature of its traffic. There are some alternatives and projects in development that attempt to find a solution to this, but most of them seem to rely on TOR; missing the point that where VPN connections are being filtered so will TOR.

    6. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      To be fair, OpenVPN isn't really designed to obfuscate the nature of the traffic any more than IPSec does. Both are about creating secure tunnels, with OpenVPN being very easy to configure and maintain as opposed to the pain that is IPSec. I use OpenVPN a lot, both for our road warriors, and to create the secure tunnels between our locations. In that role it really is an incredibly nice piece of software. But if I were looking at making something whose intent was to disguise that I was encrypting traffic at all, it's not the tool to use. Now as I understand it OpenVPN is pretty modular, so I would imagine if someone were to come up with some other encryption mechanism meant more to get around deep pack inspection, that would probably work, but as I said, such methods will inevitably make for a slower tunnel, and as OpenVPN is more of an infrastructure VPN, I'm not sure it's quite the right tool for that job.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are talking simple in THEORY, but not in practice. We're talking about sniffing the traffic of a COUNTRY, not a small office.

      Which we know the NSA has been capable of doing IN PRACTICE for at least a decade now (from the Snowden leaks). Fuck it, they've been able to not only inspect, but also duplicate, store, and analyze substantial portions of US traffic! That already goes far beyond simple DPI.

      AFAIK, China has been doing carrier-grade DPI for a while now. Don't underestimate their capabilities. If they truly do want to crack down this time, they absolutely do have the resources and technology to do so.

    8. Re: OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure that will help. I'd wager that they're far less interested in a user who's (probably) watching Top Gear and Game of Thrones than they'd be in someone with low traffic who's more likely to be using it for covert communications

    9. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No need for that mental masturbation, just google great firewall probing, the system just stores the host and attempts to connect later, if the Tor connection succeeds the host is blocked.

      http://www.cs.kau.se/philwint/static/gfc/

      https://idea.popcount.org/2013-07-11-fun-with-the-great-firewall/

    10. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Of course they can simply demand that whomever provides access / if they do it themselves have to filter it?

    11. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that some deep packet inspection methods can determine if potentially encrypted data is being passed through a filter. Obviously it's going to be error prone, but what does that matter when the general plan is to sufficiently inconvenience people so they don't even try. I doubt the PRC cares that maybe the odd innocent bystander's data gets hit as a false positive.

      As a counter to that, I have read of encryption schemes that will bypass this kind of filtering, but it's going to be a lot slower as a lot more junk data has to be thrown in to fool detection. Good for low-bandwidth needs like passing text-based emails and the like, but not much good for anything high bandwidth like voice communications.

      IIRC there is a patch for OpenVPN to make a tcp:443 based VPN appear to be a genuine https connection, even to DPI

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    12. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This so much.

      Random padding, random timings, random anything, all of them massively aid in being undetected.
      They can break even the best pattern analysis.
      Doesn't even need to be fully random, pseudorandom works fine, a simple checksum of the data plus the current second will make things random enough. Or any other handful of methods. The more they are blocked, the harder the newer ones become to detect. It is unwinnable.

      The same applies to bots that crawl websites and stuff like that. A random timer, mouse movements, all of that can easily fool scripts that monitor interactivity. (such as Googles hilarious CAPTCHA system that was broken wide open very quickly by a dude on Reddit, for fun)

      Of course, it will likely get shot down under terrorism laws eventually.

    13. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      timing and sizes are different so they can in fact catch it :(

    14. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "NSA has been capable of doing IN PRACTICE "
      With enough money and time the NSA or any state intelligence agencies can most certainly try and analyze all of the Internet activity. However, the documents released by Snowden clearly stated that the NSA attempted to do this but abandoned the project because it was too expensive and there was no real benefit in attempting to capture, store, and process that data. If you think about it trying to collect and process every bit of internet activity is a fools errand. There is just no practical way to do so that would provide any benefit to the security agencies. What the security agencies do have is a sophisticated set of tools that can be brought to bear on clearly defined targets. If you show up on the NSA radar you are basically fucked. And the fuss over access to call meta data seems over blown. That data has been stored ever since the first phone bill was created. Since the content is not stored any complaints about that do not apply. However, access to the call metadata can be used to map the phone activity and call chain with just one phone number being needed to seed the algorithm. Without a targeted number the data is useless to the intelligence agencies. The data would continue to feed the customer bills and be used by the carrier to model network usage and other metrics needed by the carrier. The capabilities and operations of the NSA have been distorted and exaggerated to the point where any rational discussion on the subject is impossible. If the US government had all the capabilities and were conducting all the spying attributed to them then why is there no evidence of their capabilities? Over the past 10 years what two entities have suffered the most harm from electronic surveillance and data theft? The government and the biggest corporations in existence? If the US was using it's counter surveillance capabilities against it's own citizens why is it not capable of stopping the attacks that have hurt them the most? Why haven't the corporations used their influence to make the government use their full capabilities against those costing them billions of dollars? If the average citizen believes the government is spying on them they should take heart knowing the government is more vulnerable to electronic mischief than the average citizen. As far as the NSA is concerned let them do their fucking job which is countering Russia, China, and any other countries efforts against the US. The NSA doesn't have the time or resources to weed through grandmas e-mails and her idiot grand children's Facebook and Twitter posts.

    15. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by dbIII · · Score: 1

      That takes serious hardware and serious money

      The sort a country has.

    16. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortinet has firewalls that can do that kind of deep inspection at 100Gbps+. DPI speed seems to scale faster than optic speed at the moment.

      You can also do it in the newest generation generic switching chips if you're willing to accept a few more false positives and you happen to have a bunch of developers to throw at the problem. That will take you to terabit per box.

    17. Re:OpenVPN port tcp/443 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about things like sshuttle? that deconstruct and reconstruct TCP packets when sending them over SSH, or are SSH connections detectable in their own right?

  3. Cracked China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chinese government promises to clean up.

  4. I wonder if the realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how stupid this is and how much it could hurt business in their country.

    1. Re:I wonder if the realize... by bmo · · Score: 1

      Politicians in the West are also typically as dumb and just as threatened by technology.

      By and large, politicians still don't like the Internet, regardless of location and political ideology. They think it takes power away from them. It's a generational issue - most politicians, when they reach national power, are my age, at least, and probably never actually touched a general-purpose computer themselves.

      The quicker my generation dies, the better.

      I'm OK with that.

      --
      BMO

    2. Re:I wonder if the realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The quicker my generation dies, the better.

      Dunno how you are, but I may be similar (late 57 here).

      So yeah, most of our gen are technical ignoramuses, I'll agree with that. But I disagree it's any better among the younger folks, and in fact in some ways it's worse. Our generation built a free and open internet, on open standards and open protocols. You wanted to run your own IRC or XMPP server, go ahead. It was not a locked down internet. It took the younger set like Zuckerberg to destroy that ethos. And not just him, but masses of people have eschewed those open standards in favor of golden jails like Instagram and Facebook that facilitate centralized censorship and control.

      In our generation there were two categories: technically literate people, and people who were not using technology so were not having adverse impact upon its evolution. In the current generation there are two categories: technically literate people, and people who are technically clueless but ARE having an adverse impact on its evolution. Sadly, in both generations the technically clueless outnumber the technically aware by magnitudes, but in our generation the clueless weren't changing the direction with their choices, since they weren't involved at all.

    3. Re:I wonder if the realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      40s here. I may have been late to the party, but I came to an Internet run by open protocols, IRC, telnet NNTP, SMTP. Want to run NFS across the Net? You could mount wuarchive.wustl.edu/archive read-only (make sure to do a soft mount.)

      What have the people like Zuc brought to the ecosystem? Spying, logging, telemetry, centralization. The hacker ethos was replaced by the ka-ching sound of anything goes if you get money for it. There has been nothing brought new by the post-2000 commercial dot-coms that wasn't usable beforehand, with the exception of the BitTorrent protocol. Everything else? just trying to capitalize for the short term, focusing on sucking data and slinging ads, above actual infrastructure building.

    4. Re:I wonder if the realize... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in 1961. Lots of my peers grew up without the inter-tubes. For those of us who do make our living developing software, there are some somewhat different issues, namely technocratic ignormamuses (and I'm being polite). These are the folk that assume:
              - if you do not already know Language X, you are unqualified. In chronological order, I learned: BASIC (high school), PL/C (PL/I subset C in college), Pascal (college), PDP-11 Assembly (college). Then, professionally: Modula2, PL/I, C, Cobol, Fortran77, Various assembly languages: 68K series, x86 (starting with 386), including multiple different *ix calling conventions by unix variant, RS/6000 (now called PowerPC), NS32xxx, C++, MIPS (little endian first, then big endian), Alpha, StrongARM, Java (v1.0), ARM v7a, relearning Java6. And then, as a derivative: trivially able to read and understand: Javascript (I learned it in a day from my 12-year old nephew), php. And that totally ignores utility languages such as bash/awk/sed, and scripting such as python (I've even worked on maintaining an assembler written in python!). Sorry, not enough Perl to be comfortable to claim expertise.
              - if you are not deeply versed in (the limited domain of) specific frameworks programming in Language X, you cannot possibly learn it.
              - OOD (object oriented design) patterns are the only way to fly. Unfortunately 99.9% of these folk have never read the book, nor can they name the "gang of four" nor do they understand that the book was written in the early 1990s, prior to C++ iterators. Furthermore, the majority of the focus of the book is limited to problems in the GUI domain. (Not everything is a GUI, shi-theads!)
              - FU-nctional programming. Let me understand this correctly. Pure FUnctional programming is the one pure and true way? Every hear of or encounter the notion of a Finite STATE machine? You know, one with (gasp!) global state variables? Like processors? Oops. Not so sorry to rain on your narrow-minded focus.

      Summary: don't assume Date-of-Birth is an temporally inverse correlation to understanding how to program. That is, I'm an Olde-Phart. But I know more programming languages, and have used the professionally, and understand them more than the vast majority of those born after 1980.

  5. Another reason to avoid business trips to China by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I used to go to China, I often found that access to sites I need to use to do my work were blocked in whole or in part. Without setting up a vpn, I can't do my work. And even then, it was always a cat and mouse game as the connections were randomly terminated.

    So now I just avoid going there at all if I can help it.

     

    1. Re:Another reason to avoid business trips to China by sims+2 · · Score: 2

      What you mean like this guy?
      https://yro.slashdot.org/story...

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:Another reason to avoid business trips to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also avoid doing business with companies like Cisco and Google who facilitate this nonsense in exchange for money.

    3. Re:Another reason to avoid business trips to China by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Countries shotting themselves in the foot is a global competition these days, it seems...

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Another reason to avoid business trips to China by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are, this policy is going to be something that will start to draw companies back out of China on top. It's easy to see the reasoning as to why they're implementing this policy though. It's Trump.(or if you're not a FT sub you can read the synopsis here.) Not him, in itself, but the idea that a populist can rise through the ranks and throw the entire establishment on end. Hell China has banned anything to do with the US election, is requiring heavy censorship on all CN sites that have comments over the election as well. They absolutely don't want people in their own country getting any ideas that even in democracies that someone can seriously upset the power balance and doing the same there.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    5. Re:Another reason to avoid business trips to China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? Excuse me? Google left China precisely because of "this nonsense".

  6. Wonder if this applies to TMobile by magarity · · Score: 2

    A couple of years ago visiting China my TMobile phone's plan included unlimited data at 2G speeds. I got sites that were normally banned to Chinese users as if I were in the US, so I suspect it routed straight to TMobile somehow but never got the details. I wonder if this crackdown will stop that access?

    1. Re:Wonder if this applies to TMobile by Xrikcus · · Score: 1

      At the moment roaming data seems to be unfiltered as far as I can tell. I assume they are working on the basis that they know that these people are foreign, so there is no benefit to filtering the traffic. VPNs have been hit and miss enough recently that I have been suspecting they have been experimenting with blocking them, although as that includes our corporate VPNs it may be coincidence.

    2. Re:Wonder if this applies to TMobile by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago visiting China my TMobile phone's plan included unlimited data at 2G speeds. I got sites that were normally banned to Chinese users as if I were in the US, so I suspect it routed straight to TMobile somehow but never got the details. I wonder if this crackdown will stop that access?

      2G access used something called Mobile IP. What happens is that your phone establishes a tunnel to your home provider and gets the IP from your home provider that way. The phone uses the tunnel to send data to the home provider who then carries it through its network as normal.

      This is the way you can ensure that you have a "stable" IP connection no matter where you roam or travel - when you go home, the tunnel isn't used, but the IP is kept so all traffic continues as usual.

    3. Re:Wonder if this applies to TMobile by bernywork · · Score: 1

      All IP traffic is still brought across the network back to your home carrier (Usually in a VPN funnily enough). Local Break Out, or "LBO" is there in 3G/4G land, and while supported in software the mobile network as it was written when the EU wanted to get rid of the roaming charges nobody has ever picked it up. As the business model of a break out gateway (Also requiring a new APN) was limited to before roaming charges were scrapped, nobody bothered setting up a provider for it.

      So in your instance as a US customer, yes, your traffic will go back across the carrier's network, either over a VPN as it's cheaper, or over a dedicated line if they've enough traffic back to your home network.

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
  7. Re: Another reason to avoid business trips to Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I agree. It's almost as bad as going to the US.

  8. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Guess we'll have to switch to SSH and HTTPS tunnels

    Yes, but you can't win that game.

    If that would ever become popular, it too can be blocked. Also that is beyond the ability of the average person to do. If they "solve" the problem for 99.9% of the population, that's what matters.

    The end game is bigger and bigger swaths of the open internet being blocked, until what's left is a white list of approved web destinations, with maybe some special exceptions being made for companies, exceptions not available to the average person.

    The internet once held the promise of freedom for all. Now it holds the chains of oppression for all. With each passing year we have seen more and more control, monitoring, and lockdown, not just in China, but all over the world. Some of that was imposed externally, like from the Chinese government, and some we freely signed up for by re-centralizing the decentralized network handed to us by its creators. It is simply too succulent a target for those who would be your masters to ignore.

    Governments want it for power over the population. Corporations want it so you are locked into their portals. People want it because in mass they are stupid and cheerfully walk into their own cages.

    We are not winning the war on internet freedom. We are losing it, badly. It is more heavily censored, controlled, and monitored than at any time in its history, and that shows no signs of slowing down.

    Captcha: prevails.

  9. Thanks for the heads up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But it is not necessary. I just quit traveling the world. I'm happy I'm living in a decent region in southern south America, insulated from the troubles of the northern hemisphere. I used to hate the distance, but now I see I'm lucky. Good climate, good food, good women and a first-world like experience.

    You can have North America and Eurasia all you want. Hope your civilizations stand the fury of the times.

    1. Re:Thanks for the heads up by Anonymice · · Score: 1

      in southern south America, insulated from the troubles of the northern hemisphere

      Hah! You're either ignorant or naive. Wait until your traveller's honeymoon period fades away & then your eyes'll be opened. Despite all of the problems in the West (TM), they ain't nothin' compared to the political & financial instability of the developing South American economies.

    2. Re:Thanks for the heads up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in southern south America, insulated from the troubles of the northern hemisphere

      Hah! You're either ignorant or naive. Wait until your traveller's honeymoon period fades away & then your eyes'll be opened. Despite all of the problems in the West (TM), they ain't nothin' compared to the political & financial instability of the developing South American economies.

      I was born here, you ass, ignorant and naive ass.

  10. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The great firewall does attempt to connect to suspicious/encrypted hosts, having too many people sshing into one box sounds trivial to detect

  11. what do you do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's your work about? Porno, espionage or spreading US deMOCKracy?

  12. Others? by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

    I my experience, it is everyone under 30 using a VPN, at least in the cities.

    --
    This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
  13. Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee, imagine living in a country whose government wanted to listen in on all your digital communications.
    How scary would that be?? :P

  14. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dear fellow netizen. This is one of the greatest posts I have seen in these pages in a long time. It sums up the essence of everything that is at stake. Kudos.

  15. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The problem when using encryption communication in a foreign hostile country, is that this is probably illegal to do so. And you don't want to visit that country prison.

    I know some people that were questionned on a cuban resort some years ago because they used SSH on a cuban internet connection.

    Just don't do this. If you don't want to comply to foreign laws, just do go in those countries...

  16. Sad story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel so sorry for the Chinese people. They're so repressed and clearly is run by an oligarchy. Their environment is ruined. And most of all the world doesn't care. I know I cannot afford American made all the time, so I'm posting AC as part of the problem.

    1. Re: Sad story.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got news for you, the bulk of Chinese Internet users are not impacted by this. 1), few ever read non-Chinese pages, 2) they *prefer* the Chinese equivalent of western sites Twitter -> wechat, YouTube-> YouKu, etc.

  17. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The end game is bigger and bigger swaths of the open internet being blocked, until what's left is a white list of approved web destinations, with maybe some special exceptions being made for companies, exceptions not available to the average person.

    Why not just start off with a white list?

  18. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make it look like there is a war going on. There is not. There are no armies and no weapons, only consumer choices. If you wanted to make a metaphor, there is no war either: it has long been over and those who deluded themselves into thinking the old, untamed Internet could continue forever have lost. It's over.

  19. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In china using them is not illegal

  20. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yep, get used to it. Because there isn't anything you can do about it. Sure the 0.0001% may be free to use what they want, (That 0.0001% being the people who can mess with ASM, and do hardware glitching to meet their own ends.) but the vast 99.9998% of people just made a new master for them to bow down to. Even better is what happens when we get hard AI that will ensure continuous monitoring and oppression.

    So why the grim future? Well because as history shows, people don't give a fuck about something until it bites them hard enough in the ass, and by then it takes a monumental effort to even try to correct the problem. Sadly, that "we don't give a fuck" attitude may very well usher in a new dark ages this time.

    You won't get people to care before then. They want it to be cheap, easy to use and forget about, and not to need to use that 10lbs of dead weight that they keep in their skulls while messing with it. That combination (Ignorance, Arrogance, and Apthy) will always result in being taken advantage of, being coerced, and being used. People just don't look out for their own safety when using the damn things. So they are blind and death to attempts to protect them as well as attempts to do them harm.

    We have no-one to blame but ourselves. We allowed them to use the things without a care in the world. We allowed them to goof off and not learn how to do basic maintenance, or even basic concepts. We gave them the fish instead of teaching them how to fish. Now we have no choice. Now we must bear the consequences of our actions and our inaction.

  21. Find a better VPN by AHuxley · · Score: 2

    A few of the better VPN providers might not have as many issues.
    Due to skill and cash flow they can try to avoid deep packet inspection.
    The deep packet inspection is looking for any use of an encrypted VPN protocol.
    Deep packet inspection is the result of a few vendors that sell into China. Deep packet inspection can be understood.
    Any quality VPN provider could look at what deep packet inspection is sold to China and then protect its VPN users.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    1. Re:Find a better VPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that would stem the flow of people and businesses are already leaving China but VPN ban is just the icing on the cake. The government has gone back 30 years in 3, returing to repressive politics to bend the people to their will. Those with better options aren't sticking around to see the inglorious return to the cultural revolution.

    2. Re:Find a better VPN by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes AC, people now know what China is all about. Control, censorship. Anything to keep the Communist party in control.
      Don't look for or mention any terms surrounding Tiananmen Square, 1989, tank man, martial law.
      The final way out was a VPN. Now thanks to global vendors been allowed to export fast deep packet inspection to China even the VPN issue is now public.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:Find a better VPN by sc0rpi0n · · Score: 1

      Any quality VPN provider could look at what deep packet inspection is sold to China and then protect its VPN users.

      Do you really think that any of the infrastructure for the GFW runs on imported foreign hardware? Many western telcos have been switching to products from ZTE and Huawei because of lower prices and products that match their requirements. China has regulation in place that forbids use of imported networking equipment for 'sensitive sectors' and actively favours local companies in many industries.

  22. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yawn. Do you actually know people in China? 90â of people I know in China use whatever site or service they want, whenever they want. The government blocks it, but it's easy enough to circumvent. Even the non-techie people have enough motivation to figure it out.

    China firewall only stops grandmas and such, and I severely doubt that will change.

    Censorship is a losing game. They can't block everything, and it takes only one chink in the armor to get out.

  23. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Agreed.
    Democracy means activism: demonstrations, protests, shutdown of expressways, boycotts, and other acts that disturb the shit slowing down.
    Push-back against power that be and against injustices. Accept it someplace, and soon it will be everyplace. Major media is crap, turn it off. Music industry, do not pay a penny to them. Movie industry, ignore their product. News-papers; cancel subscriptions. Anything advertised is suspect and probably unneeded, don't buy it, use recommendations for products.
    Stock ownership should mean a vote, public ownership of mutual funds etc, should mean seats on the board, by ownership groups.
    Businesses that complains about rules and regulations? Where else are you going to sell your stuff? India?
    Electronic voting should be banned, dual-voting places should be used, results should match.
    Power is never taken away without some noise, expect some.

  24. LOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty sure the guy who wrote XMPP is closer to MY age (30s) than your crusty old 57. You guys invented MU*s and IRC, the generation before you invented the ARPAnet and helped morph it into the he internet, and the gen between yours and mine helped morph it into the web.

    There is plenty of blame to go around, but honestly the technoramuses exist in each generation. They are the guys who had a console instead of a computer. Who bought something at the store rather than getting it as a kit to solder together. Who had their first kiss in k-6 instead of after high school. The sheeple will always be sheep. All you can do is drain the intellect from their society and let it naturally collapse, while you start on the next one and try and fend off the inevitable hordes of idiotic barbarians, just as has been done for thousands upon thousands of years.

  25. Thanks for raising public awareness by Nocturrne · · Score: 1

    This is great. Many more people in China are now aware of the problem, due to the public announcement. So many more people are questioning "why?" and signing up for overseas VPN services. In any case, we have adapted technology already to avoid their DPI and more countermeasures are ready for the next escalation. The more you tighten your grip, the more star systems will slip through ..

  26. Motorcycles and Internet Censorship in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a video by some white guys who have lived in china for about a decade, riding their motorcycle around in China and talking about internet censorship in China... from April 2016, so pretty recent. ADVChina

  27. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? I am Chinese and lived in Shenzhen for the last few months. I can tell that you are wrong on so many counts.

    1. VPN has become inaccessible 90% of the time. No hope there.

    2. Most Chinese do not know what's outside. They only read Chinese.

    3. There is now a sufficient amount of nationalism among the Chinese, since Huawei phones are kicking asses everywhere, and China has many things that the others don't, such as ubiquitous micro-payments with WeChat and Alipay.

    4. The remaining freedom-loving Chinese are hoping that America would invade and free them from this mess (one of the reasons that they supported Trump). But they won't tell you.

  28. Re: Another reason to avoid business trips to Chin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think this is funny? You compare US to China?

    I hope US becomes like China. Then, you won't think it's funny anymore.

  29. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by denis.goddard · · Score: 1

    This us why thousands of us have moved to New Hampshire with the Free State Project

  30. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bleak, but there is one good thing. Corporations want to lock people into their portals. They may get the masses, but not those that don't want to. I never started with facebook because it didn't appeal to me - not even with no ads and no tracking. I had no urge to see what people had for dinner today - or post trivia like that. Today, plenty of reasons to not use facebook - and it is easy because I never started. Similiar for other 'portals'.

    The masses are doomed, but not necessarily the experts.

    As for China, they will merely have to hide their VPNs with steganography. You can already run VPN over DNS to get around firewalls. Not merely running a vpn protocol on port 53, but masquerading as real DNS lookups in order to fool packet inspection.

    Vpn over http is even easier to hide. To cencors, it'll look like you're posting & viewing lots of blurry cat images on some foreign picture forum, but with vpn encrypted traffic encoded into the lower bits.

  31. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That hackneyed scheme will go on until the Federal Government decides to step in, at which point everyone participating will go home to sulk or there will be another Waco. You cannot win. Stop deluding yourselves.

  32. Re: So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I spent considerable time in China last time in December, and performance of VPN (particularly, ExpressVPN through Hong Kong) was surprisingly good; most of the time it was better experience than hotel VPNs across Western Europe. Mostly it felt that problems stemmed from something like using negative side effects of CGN as a feature to torture VPNs, but that could be worked around. In general, it may be pretty hard to tell if a network issue for traffic abroad is caused intentionally by the Great Firewall, or if it's just otherwise flaky.

    Nonetheless, it's a game against a party which has to be called hostile towards your interests, and with no intent to give up. There are numerous weaknesses on Chinese Internet censorship, but in the end, they will win if they really want it. At this point they're mostly indifferent towards marginal group of foreigners bypassing the censorship, but if it would be a widespread (that is, hundreds of millions of Chinese) political issue (causing trouble to the Party), they would find a way to get things their way...

  33. Re:So... SSH and HTTPS tunnels then? by sc0rpi0n · · Score: 1

    Guess we'll have to switch to SSH and HTTPS tunnels instead of brazenly using IPSec and OpenVPN. Got the message loud and clear. :D

    ISPs appear to throttle TCP connections to outside the GFW to 50kB/s. Since SSH runs over a single TCP connection, you will be accessing the internet at 0.4MBit. SSH connections are also long lived and easy to identify.

    Shadowsocks to a server in Hong Kong with good peering (say Microsoft Azure East Asia datacenter) works well. Cheap VPS providers in HK have lousy connections to China with significant package loss.