Slashdot Mirror


Indiegogo Halted Retro Computer Campaign (bbc.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report on BBC: Crowdfunding platform Indiegogo intervened to stop a handheld retro computer console campaign from acquiring further funding, the BBC has learned. The Spectrum ZX Vega+, backed by Sir Clive Sinclair, had achieved its original crowdfunding target. But then Indiegogo halted further fundraising because of delivery delays and a lack of communication to backers. The project's organizers had asked the BBC not to reveal the development. The BBC understands no consoles have been delivered to backers, despite a pledge last month that they would "ship after 20 Feb 2017." And the company behind the project -- Retro Computers Limited -- suggested these details might put its team at risk.

42 comments

  1. Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At risk of litigation?

    1. Re:Risk? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      It's certainly not because of "delivery delays and a lack of communication to backers".

      Delivery delays and lack of communication is completely normal for IGG projects, as are complete scams.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:Risk? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      IIRC Sir Clive sold the ZX Spectrum rights to Amstrad. Alan Sugar is probably the one to blame.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Risk? by Frederic54 · · Score: 1

      Good old times with my Amstrad CPC6128, learnt assembler on it and TurboPascal/dBaseII etc in CPM3, what a great machine it was in the 80s

      --
      "Science will win because it works." - Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sky bought Amstrad so the Sinclair Trademark and any spectrum related IP belongs to Sky now.

    5. Re:Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alan Sugar sold Amstrad to Sky TV several years back.

      OTOH, Clive Sinclair *did* endorse the Spectrum Vega+, though I'm assuming doing that in exchange for a small chunk of the royalties is as far as his involvement went.

    6. Re:Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It resembled the tricorder too much.

      20th Century Fox to blame?

    7. Re:Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rectangular with rounded corners. Apple to blame.

    8. Re:Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because I have had a ZX Spectrum emulator on my Dingoo A-320 for years. This dedicated Spectrum console is probably just a scam.

  2. Indiegogo Halted Retro Computer Campaign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I feel like there's some random headline generator being developed and we're all being used as test subjects

    1. Re:Indiegogo Halted Retro Computer Campaign by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      Sometimes I feel like the comments are also generated by some bad A.I. that can't fridge blue also grass door if sky plastic.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  3. There's more to the story... by lord_mike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apparently, sometime in the last two years, some of the directors left the company and started suing the remaining board for various things causing some strife and chaos. I have their original product, the original Vega that plugs into the TV console. It works well, and I got it on sale so it wasn't horribly expensive. It got good reviews, and many were excited about this new handheld version coming out--then something happened. Support simply vanished: the user forum disappeared, never to return; emails to the staff were never read or returned; and the promised OS update never arrived. Meanwhile, they were still shipping plenty of the old Vegas, constantly promoting the Vega handheld, and updating their twitter feed. Despite all the problems, they assured everyone that everything was fine.... except the product was getting delayed and delayed and delayed. Something weird is up with them--it's like the company is only half alive.

    1. Re:There's more to the story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the guy behind the Vega+ also the same guy trying to drum up funding on IGG for the Gemini PDA (which is still open for backing) ?

      This all sounds dodgey as fuck, the more you read the worse it sounds.
        From the BBC article "But in December 2016, after the BBC contacted RCL to ask about the status of the Vega+, the broadcaster was threatened with legal action."
      "Our clients are concerned that the BBC is in fact supporting and participating in a malicious campaign intended to denigrate our clients' reputation,"

      If that reply doesn't set alarm bells ringing, then I have a bridge I want you to invest in.

  4. Where's the problem? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

    The BBC understands no consoles have been delivered to backers, despite a pledge last month that they would "ship after 20 Feb 2017."

    Technically, at this point as long as they ship they have fulfilled their promise as it is after 20 Feb 2017. It could be a month from now or 2 years, but they've still met their pledge.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re: Where's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is the "we will ship the first units in February" part.

    2. Re:Where's the problem? by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Technically, at this point as long as they ship they have fulfilled their promise as it is after 20 Feb 2017. It could be a month from now or 2 years

      If you want to look at it that way, they could deliver it five minutes before the heat death of the universe and they'd still technically have met their promise...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Where's the problem? by Nidi62 · · Score: 2

      Technically, at this point as long as they ship they have fulfilled their promise as it is after 20 Feb 2017. It could be a month from now or 2 years

      If you want to look at it that way, they could deliver it five minutes before the heat death of the universe and they'd still technically have met their promise...

      That was kind of my point. In my mind I read that statement along the lines of the Blizzard definition of soon

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    4. Re:Where's the problem? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      So what if they fail it?
      Crowdfunding is not purchasing. People who put in money should have the expectation that it may fail to deliver, and be willing to accept that.
      Don't gamble unless you're willing to lose.

      If it was a sure thing, they would not have needed to go the crowdfunding route - financial backers would have queued up to support them. It wasn't, so they didn't, so they didn't.

    5. Re:Where's the problem? by Immerman · · Score: 2

      Quite.

      Which is why you should never trust any company making any claims with such weasel words. If they mention a deadline, the deadline should be phrased as the *latest* acceptable date - "Will shipped by xx/yy/zzzz". If they're talking performance, it should be the minimum acceptable performance.

      Witness the vast majority of ISPs selling packages with performance "up to" aaaa Mb/s - good luck ever seeing those speeds, but since "speeds up to" includes everything down to zero, they're never in violation of the terms (and you know it's intentional scamming rather than technical limitations since if you downgrade to a package that offers the speeds you're actually getting, they immediately cut the speed to a similar fraction of the new "up to" speed)

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    6. Re: Where's the problem? by number6x · · Score: 1

      In February, after February 20th, 2017 could still be February 2018, 2019, 2020, ...

    7. Re:Where's the problem? by ctilsie242 · · Score: 1

      The problem is getting VCs. Last time I approached investors for something new, they wanted me to be able to get them richer on the way out if they hopped on and decided to leave at any time, and anything less, don't bother. Another VC said he was either interested in data going into the company, ads coming out of the company, and anything else is not worth his time, and mentioned the Meitu app as the ideal product.

      So, trying to get venture capital is tough these days. Crowdfunding is a good solution. You design a cool product, crowdfund it, ship it, and now you have the capital and profit needed to run your startup without some guy stepping in with 51+ percentage of the firm demanding that every widget be made as cheaply as possible, every single programmer be offshored, and every IT person be an H-1B from a contract house.

      What other ways are there to get funded? The credit market is tight.

      I would say crowdsourcing is a good way to get what is needed. Yes, I do agree that crowdsourcing isn't 100%... but what is, these days?

      Sometimes I wonder about a type of insurance that is obtained during the crowdfunding, similar to a surety bond. If a crowdfunding company fails, the insco would be the ones who would refund the would-be buyers. Of course, it won't be cheap, but it would give peace of mind.

    8. Re:Where's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Lloyd's would take it, the premium would be half or more of the total crowd fund. People so support consumer electronics crowdsourcing get the idiot tax they deserve.

    9. Re: Where's the problem? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      When WW1 broke out they said it would be all over by Christmas. And they were right, with a month to spare.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  5. Monohm /runcible is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, I would think indigogo would have done something to Aubrey and the Monohm crew responsible for the seemingly vaporware Runcible... they promised to "Get better" at updates, but their last update was literally a pat on their back for even trying to build it, and an acknowledgment that they suck at updates... Last time I fund something like that..

  6. Dodgy management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From all sorts of forums a synopsis seems to be

    Two guys set up the idea, do the first Sinclair vega sign up with two other guys to do the vega plus, making four directors of a company

    Original guys Have an idea, do a totally unrelated Commodore type project (the64) for a different company, still haven't been paid for the original vega or new vega work

    Two other vega directors get the grumps, get legal,
    Two original directors quit well before crowdfunding campaign finishes / hands over money

    Two vega directors try to take the originals shares

    Then the fun happens

    Summary from publicly written stuff
    Two guys start a company,
    Two other guys bought in as equals to help with logistics and promotion basically do their best to screw the original blokes and run off with the business....and get handed half a million poinds of crowdfunding for..intentions to deliver unknown...licences unpaid, wages unpaid, original vega stock profits unaccounted for

    All seems rather dodgy for the current owners of the Vega business

    1. Re: Dodgy management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's pretty close to the truth. Basically the original two guys were real Spectrum fans, but apparently Clive Sinclair would only give it the go ahead if they partnered with one of his old chess buddies. Chess guy sees pound signs and decides to draw £50k a month in salary. Two original guys object, knowing that kind of money would mean no chance of delivering project. Chess guy acts like an arsehole. Two original guys quit in protest, but keep shares so Chess guy can't shut the company down and do a runner. Chess guy illegally tries a share grab. Two original guys defend this in court and win, thus again preventing chess guy from doing a runner. Chess guy tries to pile shit on original two guys by lying to the press about them, but it turns out they actually left *before* the half a million was even paid. Chess guy eventually runs out of excuses. Chess guy has now - along with his daughter who is also a director - drawn salary of £500k. Product never gets made. Chess guy's name is David Levy and it turns out he's done this before. I feel sorry for the original guys who saw their dreams crushed by someone who never had any intention of delivering a product and just wanted a vey hefty salary for doing nothing. A google of David Levy will reveal his dirty business dealings - shame the original two guys didn't find the info out before allowing him to join!

    2. Re: Dodgy management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One look at the nose should have told them everything they needed to know.

      I think the shares was more about legal standing. When he runs the company into the ground they will have grounds to sue him as shareholders. I think that's what he wanted to avoid.

  7. Indiegogo need to step in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a point where a large-ish failure could threaten the reputation of the platform itself? The bulk of people don't care about "funding development" of a product, they want a product.

    If they start believing that crowd sourcing is faring with danger then the platform will die.

    Maybe indiegogo need to step in, freeze any funds they still have and block all other campaigns by the same people (the new Psion type thing?) before pressuring the, for refunds or product.

  8. It's a Sinclair... what did you expect? by neilo_1701D · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Us old-timers who grew up with Sinclair machines are shocked: late, under-performing and funky keys and you expected anything different?!

    Every Sinclair machine has had a horrible keyboard: the ZX-80 and ZX-81 was diabolical; the Spectrum 16K / 48K awful; and the Spectrum+ & QL merely horrible.

    Every single machine was late, buggy and idiosyncratic enough to make you wonder if Sir Clive simply should get a better dealer.

    BUT they were cheap and relatively robust. The BASIC manuals were typically better than anything else available. There was lots of software and other people who owned them. As an introduction to computing, the Sinclair machines were wonderful. I credit my ZX-81 for being the launch-point for where I am today (ERP technical consultant).

  9. Why the Spectrum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It was a horrendous system even for the time period in which it was released. It's color palette was terrible and the attribute clash was ridiculous. It's sound/music was just a bunch of beeps. Compare that to the Famicom which came out in '83, it had both better graphics and sound, faster loadin, not to mention the games were fundamentally better despite less RAM. The Commodore 64 is similarly superior and its price dropped quickly.

    1. Re:Why the Spectrum? by neilo_1701D · · Score: 2

      Why the Spectrum?

      It was cheap, and people already had familiarity with it's BASIC via the ZX-80 and ZX-81. Coming from those machines, the Spectrum represented a technicolor nirvana.

    2. Re:Why the Spectrum? by lord_mike · · Score: 1

      The Famicom was not available outside of Japan, so that is not comparable, and the Commodore 64 remained expensive in the UK due to tariffs. The Spectrum was the lowest priced color machine on the market in the UK by far, and it became very popular as a result. With a huge amount of software titles, It maintained good market share even though there were superior computers available--just like the Atari 2600 maintained market share for years after it was technically outdated here in the United States.

      More importantly, for a generation of British youth, the Spectrum was the first computer they ever owned, and it was powerful enough and fun enough to be remembered fondly--which is why the Spectrum retro market is still strong over there.

      A note on technical superiority. Yes, there were technically better machines available, but the Sinclair line of computers did way more with less. It's quite amazing that the speccy could do all that it did, considering its base bones innards. Its strength was its flexibility. It was well designed and well engineered (within the extreme cost limits imposed by Sir Clive).

    3. Re:Why the Spectrum? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I believe that the Spectrum hardware was very similar to the ZX81, with the (rather horrible) colour support and more RAM the only big differences. I say this because, decades later, someone managed to port the Spectrum ROM image to the ZX81, giving compatibility with at least some Spectrum software: https://groups.google.com/foru...

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  10. What is up with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    WTF is wrong with people who put money into Kickstarter, Indiegogo or whatever?

    Surely the deal is clear enough. You put your money into a speculative venture. Development and/or manufacture of a thing that does not exist yet. It may come to fruition or it may not.

    Why on Earth are they kicking like infants when it all fails?

    Me, I have backed a few projects on Kickstarter. Because I think it's a neat idea, because, well, I want one. I checkout who is behind it. I check their track record. I place my bet, or not, accordingly.

    In this case, supported by Sir Clive Sinclair, makes me giggle.

    Uncle Clive was famous for late delivery and products that were cheap skate and hardly functioned at all.

    1. Re:What is up with these people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not what happened here though. The backers pledged their cash to the people who had the firmware already written with a prototype ready for production and who had delivered the original ZX Vega in 2015. But the cash ended up with a team who had nothing but a few artists impressions.

    2. Re:What is up with these people? by Shimbo · · Score: 2

      WTF is wrong with people who put money into Kickstarter, Indiegogo or whatever?

      Surely the deal is clear enough. You put your money into a speculative venture. Development and/or manufacture of a thing that does not exist yet. It may come to fruition or it may not.

      Why on Earth are they kicking like infants when it all fails?

      Normally I would agree with you: sometimes a project burns through all the cash before getting a working product and then they go silent whilst they scrabble around trying to salvage something. However, they don't usually then have the money to burn on lawyers to try to keep the story under wraps. That does smell bad, and they deserve to get Streisanded all over the net for that, at least.

  11. Robert X. Cringely's Kickstarter project is worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kickstarter should be doing something about Robert X. Cringely's Mineserver project. Advertised in September 2015 as "unlike many Kickstarter hardware projects, for the $99 Mineserver virtually all development work is already done so risks are minimized. If we had cases we could start shipping tomorrow.", and promised to ship in time for Christmas 2015, they still haven't shipped a single unit. The most recent project update was November 2016 when they promised to start "shipping the week after next". There hasn't been a word from them since then. Backers have over-run the comments section on the last three posts at his blog, and he's not uttered a peep about it since promising in comments "more on that in a few days" back on January 10.

    Comments have been pretty entertaining. There's a rumor that the delay is all about trying to program these little servers to secretly mine bitcoins for the Cringely clan in the background while pretending to be Minecraft servers.