Slashdot Mirror


Boaty McBoatface To Go On Its First Antarctic Mission (theguardian.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Guardian: A small yellow robot submarine, called Boaty McBoatface after a competition to name a new polar research ship backfired, is being sent on its first Antarctic mission. Boaty, which has arguably one of the most famous names in recent maritime history, is a new type of autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV), which will be able to travel under ice, reach depths of 6,000 meters, and transmit the data it collects to researchers via a radio link. Its mission will be to investigate water flow and turbulence in the dark depths of the Orkney Passage, a 3.5km deep region of the Southern Ocean. The data it collects will help scientists understand how the ocean is responding to global warming. Boaty will travel with the DynOPO (Dynamics of the Orkney Passage Outflow) expedition on the British Antarctic Survey (BAS) research ship James Clark Ross, departing from Punta Arenas in Chile on 17 March. The craft will be sent back and forth through a cold abyssal current that forms an important part of the global circulation of ocean water. In 2019 Boaty McBoatface will be fitted with acoustic and chemical sensors and sent into the North Sea to "sniff out" signals associated with the artificial release of gas beneath the seabed. A future aim for Boaty will be to attempt the first-ever crossing of the Arctic Ocean under ice, which has the potential to deliver a significant change in scientists' ability to observe change in this vital region.

116 comments

  1. What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should have been Ahmad Ibn Majid's Fantasy Sub

    1. Re:What a stupid name. by Jhon · · Score: 1

      The name is a red flag. Idiocracy is on the horizon.

    2. Re:What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least that doesn't sound like some millennial child came up with it.

    3. Re:What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, where's your tattoo? How come you don't got a tattoo?

    4. Re: What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh man. Then it could've been named after my daughter!

    5. Re:What a stupid name. by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      No it ain't. Idiocracy was too optimistic. When the shit hit the fan who did they seem out? The smartest man in the world. Whereas now, the swamp is being drained right into the Oval office.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re: What a stupid name. by kurkosdr · · Score: 1

      Nah, the worst is behind us, considering TV doesn't own the majority of people's free time anymore, but instead the internet does. Remember how TV tried to brand ISIS as "rebels" and "fighters" (ahh, so poetic) during the first years of the Syruan civil war and The Economist called for an airstrike on Assad so the job of ISIS would be made easier, while many independent news websites correctly identified ISIS as murderers and jihadists, which is exactly what they are? I want to see more of that happening in the future. It means we 've passed peak stupid, where "peak stupid" is basically a news cartel force-feeding doublethink on people according to what servers their interest at the given time, destroying critical and rational thought in the process.

    7. Re:What a stupid name. by hey! · · Score: 1

      If outstanding accomplishment in exploration makes someone worth remembering, then more people should be familiar with the name Ahman Ibn Majid.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    8. Re:What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Na, it is a sign that the uptight, humorless, busybodies leading our culture for the last couple of decades are no longer being taken seriously, and people are allowing their sense of humor to run free. We're having fun and you are welcome to join in.

    9. Re: What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember how TV tried to brand ISIS as "rebels" and "fighters" (ahh, so poetic) during the first years of the Syruan civil war and The Economist called for an airstrike on Assad so the job of ISIS would be made easier

      Link? I remember TV talking about an actual group of rebels against Assad who aren't ISIS. Here is a map of Syria. Gray is ISIS. Green and Yellow are anti-Assad (i.e., "rebel") territory. Red is Assad.

    10. Re: What a stupid name. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Yeah, except that thousands of people made such outstanding accomplishments. Why would UK name the thing after one that is Omanese, of all places? I'm sure they have enough of their own.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    11. Re: What a stupid name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naming a boat with anything but numbers is what is dumb. I can understand naming a dog: they can understand their name. Why the fuck would you use a boat's name?

    12. Re:What a stupid name. by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The name is a red flag. Idiocracy is on the horizon.

      Idiocracy has arrived. But the name is more a reaction to it, not the cause or symptom.

      The first Internet vote, long ago when People magazine tried to run their "most beautiful person" for the year, Leo DiCaprio was supposed to win. The geeks got together and sent out notices over the internett that we were going to do something about that. So we had a massive write in for Hank, the angry drunken dwarf. Hank was a regular on the Howard Stern show at the time. Well Hank won, but People Magazine named DiCaprio "most beautiful man" anyway.

      Point is, it takes a certain level of stupidity to ask questions you won't accept any answer you don't like. That answer is not the stupidity, it's to assume a response you like in the first place. The people who named this UAV understand that very well.

      Nerds rejoice! All hail Boaty McBoatface! Praise it with great praise!

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    13. Re: What a stupid name. by fisted · · Score: 1

      I guess you also strongly disapprove of DNS?

  2. Boaty McBoatface: people power by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny

    Another recent example of a democratic election gone horribly wrong.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another recent example of a democratic election gone horribly wrong.

      No kidding. If they respected democracy they would have named the actual ship that instead of a robot launched from the ship.

    2. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by balbeir · · Score: 1

      This one is orange-ish too !

    3. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Scarred+Intellect · · Score: 1

      Another recent example of a democratic election gone horribly wrong.

      This is exactly why we can't have nice things.

    4. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Whenever this ship hits a port, locals should ninja in and 'fix' the name.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    5. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by rmdingler · · Score: 1

      Sadly, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” -W.S. Churchill

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    6. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by TWX · · Score: 1

      Damn, I guess that "Yellow" wouldn't have been a good name for this submarine...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    7. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by rmdingler · · Score: 1
      *clap* *clap* *clap*

      Well played.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    8. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The orangutan replaced the gorilla after it had replaced the chimp.

    9. Re: Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. How could Hitlery have become the DNC nominee?!?! I would have voted for Bernie but the Democrats made me vote for Trump.

    10. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

      Horribly wrong? It is just a silly name.
      From the internet, I would have expected something celebrating national socialism and reproductive functions.
      It is good once in a while when people don't take themselves too seriously. Silly things also tend to be memorable as long as it is not overdone.

    11. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Damn, I guess that "Yellow" wouldn't have been a good name for this submarine...

      I'm not living in that thing....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    12. Re: Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. How could Hitlery have become the DNC nominee?!?! I would have voted for Bernie but the Democrats made me vote for Trump.

      Didn't you hear? The DNC primary was fixed.. Hillary won the day she filed with all the super delegates she got, Sanders didn't have a chance.

      Face it, you WANTED to vote for Trump...

    13. Re: Boaty McBoatface: people power by rmdingler · · Score: 0

      Agreed. How could Hitlery have become the DNC nominee?!?! I would have voted for Bernie but the Democrats made me vote for Trump.

      Ironically, the Clinton campaign sought to promote Trump, Carson, and Cruz in order to swing the Republicans to a more conservative platform; a platform they imagined would be easy to defeat in the general election.

      Clinton was just difficult to get behind. She reeked of career, entitled, and, yes, even crooked, politician.

      Again with the irony, she was possibly the perfect outcome for the Republicans and Trump.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    14. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Another recent example of a democratic election gone horribly wrong.

      No kidding. If they respected democracy they would have named the actual ship that instead of a robot launched from the ship.

      They came at it from a "what respected name will people choose?" Then a bunch of people piled on with screwball names, treating it as an excuse to make a joke.

    15. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      They came at it from a "what respected name will people choose?" Then a bunch of people piled on with screwball names, treating it as an excuse to make a joke.

      "Respected" is a completely subjective term. If they only wanted people to pick certain types of names, they should have a provided a list of choices. The problem was the whole point of the naming contest was to get people more interested in scientific exploration in the Antarctic. Spoiler: Most people don't care about polar ocean science, or any Oceanography that doesn't involve studying fish and mammels, so the chances of them picking the "respected" names that were wanted were low -- those people are far from household names. They were more likely to get the boat named after a popular contestant from The Bachelorette than the scientific pioneers they really wanted.

    16. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by vux984 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Frankly, I think it went right.

      Seriusly... think about it. The gaurdian doesn't even bother to mention the Attenborough (the host ship) until 6 paragraphs in. But Boaty McBoatface is on the HEADLINE.

      Nobody but an enthusiast gives a shit about the ship named RRS Sir David Attenborough. But regular people genuinely want to hear about and to read about the adventures of Boaty McBoatface adventures. They want to tell their children stories about Boaty McBoatface.

      The NERC had a real chance to grab the public's interest, and they almost completely blew it, and the burned a lot of goodwill with what they did, but letting the absurdity of Boaty McBoatface stay with the project even to the limited extent that they did all but guarantees them headlines for years to come, and people will click on them to hear what 'Boaty' is up to.

    17. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      The problem was the whole point of the naming contest was to get people more interested in scientific exploration in the Antarctic.

      I wonder what percentage of submitters even know what the Antarctic is. Or scientific exploration, for that matter.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re: Boaty McBoatface: people power by richardellisjr · · Score: 1

      I suspect the problem is serious people wouldn't want to put this on their resume. Imagine "served as . What they failed to understand is how much of a conversation starter it is. I'd bet they'd get interviews from people interested in the name alone. Plus if they're single men they have the best opener ever: "hi, I'm the first mate on the Boaty McBoatface"

    19. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wasnt the poll supposed to come up with suggestions for a name and not the actual name it self?

    20. Re: Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people hear boaty mcboatface it puts a smile on their face, tell me that is not noble cause. No boat named after a human has brought so much joy to the world, except maybe Bob Barker.

    21. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? It is funny and the name of a ship doesn't matter that much.

    22. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Democracy isn't the tyranny of the majority. It's the will of the people, all the people.

      That's why we don't just elect one leader who then gets absolute control, or run everything by popular vote. It's a compromise, representation of different views and different groups.

      That's why Brexit and Trump are such disasters. Instead of a compromise solution, we get extremes and the winners ranting about how democracy requires them to get everything they want and fuck you fascist anti-democrat for even daring to question it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Instead of a compromise solution, we get extremes and the winners ranting about how democracy requires them to get everything they want and fuck you fascist anti-democrat for even daring to question it.

      That perfectly explains every piece of legislation for the last 20 years...

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    24. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And also demonstrates why it is so bad. The US is one of the worst, lurching from side to side every 8 years or so. Because there was no consensus when laws were past, the new administration immediately repeals or changes many of them and the legal landscape and the things people and businesses rely on become very unstable.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    25. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they named the vessel according to David Attenburough, I'm not even mad. What would be wrong if Sir David was the US president and Trump was put in a submarine?

    26. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Democracy can lead to tyranny from the majority. The will of the people isn't some great and boundless thing that is the end all be all of civics. Like any human endeavor it can be corrupted and abused in a tyrannical way. "All the people" will never agree unanimously and if there is disagreement hostilities can follow through resentment. That is why representative government is the better alternative because it has what is good about democracy while guarding against what is bad. It isn't perfect but nothing is.

      You mention compromise but yet are unwilling to let the 'other side' have their day when you say "That's why Brexit and Trump are such disasters". Trump has barely had time in office and brexit is still in the planning phase. The only thing that is "disastrous" is the reaction from the losing side. I have seen how the remain camp has acted since the referendum and it isn't something to be proud of. Just like how the democrats acted after the election.

      So far, I have seen anti-democratic sentiment from remainers and democrats in the form of "revote until I win", "Trump not my president", "ignore the law" and advocating for coup d'etat so that they don't have to accept the results. It isn't a democracy if you always get your way by ignoring the other side. Accepting defeat is part of democracy.

    27. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      That is because the congress gave so much power to the POTUS. If you are scared about what the president can do, the president is too powerful.

      A reason to vote for Trump was because he was hated by both sides of the political elite that the congress may actually do its job by counter-balancing the power of the president so that this doesn't happen.

    28. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. I think it's a great name. People will actually pay some attention to what antarctic explorer Boaty McBoatface does. If it were named something reasonable and boring we wouldn't be talking about it now. And given that the internet named it, they seriously dodged a bullet. I'm shocked it's not named "The SS Hitler Did Nothing Wrong."

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    29. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A reason to vote for Trump was because he was hated by both sides of the political elite that the congress may actually do its job by counter-balancing the power of the president so that this doesn't happen.

      Yes, turns out he was only draining the swamp so that he could fill it with his own people.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    30. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by penandpaper · · Score: 1

      Big shocker. You sound upset that the losing side isn't filling it with their own people. That is what happens when the other side wins.

      When Obama appointed Tom Wheeler, a lobbyist for telecommunications, to the FCC there was concern about regulatory capture and his possible favoring of companies he lobbied for. In the end, he did ok by most standards and ruled against those companies a few times. It is better to judge the actions of people than by any superficial metric that changes faster than a fart in the wind.

      I like a number of his people. Mattis and Gorsuch are such examples.

    31. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by subnomine · · Score: 1

      I second this. I want to hear about all the adventures of Boaty McBoatface.
      I had a friend who worked for Scripps on similar devices, and none had interesting names. I don't remember what they accomplished.

    32. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      This should come as no shock to anyone who has ever been in a swamp. You can pump out water forever... You're just going to have new shit flowing in to replace it.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    33. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There is a certain amount of schadenfreude to be had when Trump voters realize he is actually worse than the ones they were so desperate to get rid of, and on top of that he is going to take away their healthcare.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    34. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      That's why Brexit and Trump are such disasters. Instead of a compromise solution, we get extremes and the winners ranting about how democracy requires them to get everything they want and fuck you fascist anti-democrat for even daring to question it.

      Trump is the first "compromise" we've had in decades. For my entire life it's been the Democrats getting a little more and the Republicans getting nothing (excluding the RINOs in office, who are in fact just globalists calling themselves "Republican", just like most of the "Democrats" - the difference being Democrats are largely in favor of globalism.)

    35. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      This should come as no shock to anyone who has ever been in a swamp. You can pump out water forever... You're just going to have new shit flowing in to replace it.

      Tell that to the Aztecs.

    36. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by idji · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between elections and referendums. In an election the people choose representatives to represent them in making decisions. In a referendum the representatives or their leaders are too cowardly/sly/divided/scared to make a decision and throw it back at the people.
      A democracy implicitly states that smarter decisions happen by representatives than by letting the people have a direct say. Boaty McBoatface is an example of a stupid result from a referendum; it would never have happened if representatives had chosen it.

    37. Re:Boaty McBoatface: people power by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between elections and referendums. In an election the people choose representatives to represent them in making decisions. In a referendum the representatives or their leaders are too cowardly/sly/divided/scared to make a decision and throw it back at the people. A democracy implicitly states that smarter decisions happen by representatives than by letting the people have a direct say. Boaty McBoatface is an example of a stupid result from a referendum; it would never have happened if representatives had chosen it.

      Wrong. Representative democracy is the result of technological limitations and lies told by oligarchies. Boaty McBoatface is an example of someone asking a massive number of people a question not worth their time and only getting the responses from idiots with too much spare time within that massive group. Using this as an example of idiots making bad decisions via direct democracy does more to outline your own logical inconsistencies than it does to highlight any in democracy.

  3. How is this backfiring? by aicrules · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's a name that was picked by the process they used. It isn't derogatory or offensive. Silly yes, but it's not a substantive part of the mission, just the moniker. It garnered a lot of attention when it was being voted and now people know what it is. That PR is great for such an expedition. Don't get your panties all twisted because something silly won. Embrace it.

    1. Re: How is this backfiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they mostly did, which is awesome. I agree with all it's a stupid name indicative of a stupid populace - but throwing it right out there and owning it is brilliant.

    2. Re:How is this backfiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This so much.
      I do not get the whining over it.

      It gave a shitload of attention to their mission, even if passively for some.
      And it has likely shown others they could also figure out ways to get more people interested in science.
      Even if only 1% of the people find interest, THAT IS GREAT, considering the trivial effort to put together a simple poll to gain interest.

      Embrace collective silliness. It is the best form of advertising!

    3. Re:How is this backfiring? by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      How is this backfiring?

      Because it should have been named, Subby McSubface! ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    4. Re:How is this backfiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really democracy unless it gives a result that you agree with! It's tyranny unless they do it my way.

    5. Re:How is this backfiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a commentary on the fools who inhabit social media sites, lapping up the latest hot trend like elementary school children.

    6. Re: How is this backfiring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What name wouldn't be indicative of a stupid populace? Naming it after a person doesn't make it less stupid, unless it was done randomly the choice is rather arrogant and presumptious that that person is the most worthy.

      Honestly the only smart choice would be numbers encoded in QR code so we can read it if the ship sinks, but that's not interesting for a name within the human realm.

    7. Re:How is this backfiring? by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Democracy is what allows stupidity to survive, thrive, and through the inevitable apathy, take over. It sacrifices what's best for what's popular, and what's popular is rarely what's best.

      In some cases it's harmless. In others, it's destructive. But generally it is the lesser of two evils. A system where everyone has an equal voice doesn't deteriorate nearly as quickly as one where some voices are more equal than others (regardless of how benevolent and intelligent those voices are), though all systems are eventually doomed to fail as it's just human nature.

      --
      ~X~
    8. Re:How is this backfiring? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Submarines are boats. The ship should have been named Shippy McShitface in the first place.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  4. Competition Backfired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the summary: ...Called Boaty McBoatface after a competition to name a new polar research ship backfired...

    Boaty, which has arguably one of the most famous names in recent maritime history...

    How did the competition backfire?

    1. Re:Competition Backfired? by raburton · · Score: 1

      How did the competition backfire?

      backfire
      verb
      Pronunciation /bakf/ (slashdot can't do phonetics!)
      2 (of a plan or action) have an opposite and undesirable effect to what was intended.

      They wanted a sensible name, they got a stupid one - their plan backfired.

    2. Re:Competition Backfired? by aicrules · · Score: 2

      They wanted popular opinion to guide the name. If they wanted a sensible name their plan should have included that as a stated requirement for submissions. Their plan didn't backfire. They are just poor planners and Snobby McSnobbypants.

    3. Re:Competition Backfired? by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

      A hipster fucktard did something stupid. Other hipster fucktard, in an attempt to be more original than each other, all did the same thing.

      So instead of producing something eloquent and insightful (like naming it after Katherine Giles) a race to the lowest common denominator ensued.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    4. Re:Competition Backfired? by TWX · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't have really opened the door to just any submission either.

      I can think of a few ways they could've fixed this so it would have had the desired result.

      First, limit who can submit. This is unfortunately probably difficult to do though, unless you use some kind of scholastic submission process like having anyone in the fourth year of schooling and above submit names to their schools, and then letting the schools whittle-down the submissions.

      Second, add extra requirements to submit. Require an essay about the name and why it would be a good one. Set a word limit or character lower-limit and use some kind of software to attempt to block out bypass attempts. Don't even bother to note to the submitter whether or not their submission qualified or not, just respond by thanking them for their interest and submission.

      Third, use a tiered process to judge entries, weed-down initial submissions through a panel, then provide the final dozen or so to open vote. If those running this submission process are worried about the result this way, encourage the panel to include at least some whimsical submissions that would be acceptable should they happen to win.

      There's no reason that this kind of thing has to be an entirely democratic process.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    5. Re:Competition Backfired? by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      How did the competition backfire?

      They wanted a "good" name for the ship when they put the poll up. They got a name they didn't like as the result and refused to use it for the ship. When there was a popular backlash about that decision they tried to mollify people by using the rejected name for one of submersibles that the ship would carry.

      Now here's an article talking entirely about the submersible without mentioning the ship at all. I think there are reasonable odds that happened because the submersible ended up with the "cool" name, while the ship got the "good" name. In fact i think if they hadn't at least named the submersible Boaty McBoatface there's at least a 50% chance this article never would have gotten posted to Slashdot at all.

      So they held a contest without foreseeing the possible consequences, and when they lucked out and got a name that might be considered silly but at least wasn't obscene they refused to use it and gave the ship a "proper" name that most people probably don't even remember. And now no one is talking about the ship itself, they're only talking about the other thing with the popular name. Sounds like a backfire to me.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    6. Re: Competition Backfired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you want to name a research vessel after a transvestite fiction writer?

    7. Re:Competition Backfired? by OhPlz · · Score: 2

      Sometimes I think voting for public officials should require a little more than just showing up and demanding a ballot.

      Sometimes.

    8. Re: Competition Backfired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the name wasn't even submitted, it was one of the original suggestions they themselves put up for the vote.
      So a little like Hillary secretly promoting trump and having it blow up in her face.

    9. Re:Competition Backfired? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      The best part is how much it annoyed people like you.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Competition Backfired? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      So you hate women, you hate climatologists and you think that if people don't want to be killed by truck drivers they shouldn't ride bikes?

      So much for your SJW stance, you racist teabagger cunt.

      I'd snitch on you to AmiMoJo if she wasn't you.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    11. Re:Competition Backfired? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I'm happily warmed by the heat of your rage and your bizarre fantasies :)

      you racist

      Inigo Montoya would like a word with you.

      I'd snitch on you to AmiMoJo if she wasn't you.

      Oh *you're* the dude who thinks me and AmiMojo are the same guy (or girl?). I'd forgotten who it was who developed funny theories. Out of interest are you also the AC stalker who followed me round for ages calling me servitroll_major (a nickname I love btw) in a reply to just about every post I wrote?

      Or maybe we've got a whole fan club out there. When does PopeRatzo get membership?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    12. Re:Competition Backfired? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Now here's an article talking entirely about the submersible without mentioning the ship at all. I think there are reasonable odds that happened because the submersible ended up with the "cool" name, while the ship got the "good" name. In fact i think if they hadn't at least named the submersible Boaty McBoatface there's at least a 50% chance this article never would have gotten posted to Slashdot at all.

      Hell, without the submersible and the cool name, I wouldn't have given it a 50% chance the Guardian would have even written an article. Similarly, if they had given the ship the cool name, this would just be yet another article about Boaty McBoatface's adventures that would be coming out weekly and we wouldn't even know that the submersible even had a name.

    13. Re:Competition Backfired? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Shit, man, if Hog keeps talking about you like that I'll have to unfoe you. Wait, who are you and what have you done with serviscope.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  5. Crossing the Artic Ocean under ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Crossing the Artic Ocean under ice was previously done in 1958 by the USS Nautilus

    1. Re: Crossing the Artic Ocean under ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sjw and science are not something that go together.
      Global climate research has nothing to do with social justice issues. It's climate science. Are you going to ignore raw data because it's 'sjw'?
      You are just as deluded as sjws, different sides of the same science denying moroons

    2. Re: Crossing the Artic Ocean under ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Organic vegetables aren't necessarily better for you, cupcake.

  6. Backfired? I think not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is a matter of (editorial ) opinion

  7. May the Prophet rain jihad down on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like an arab is going to figure out how to build a sub.

    with the fire of a thousand suns.

    1. Re: May the Prophet rain jihad down on you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many solar systems is that. 1000? So thats going to take some time. Better rain down with one sun first and then evaluate if more sun raining is needed?

    2. Re: May the Prophet rain jihad down on you by mrvan · · Score: 1

      How many solar systems is that. 1000? So thats going to take some time. Better rain down with one sun first and then evaluate if more sun raining is needed?

      This reaction is exactly why we can't have great things anymore!

  8. a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Glad to see Boaty Mc Boatface in the news at last. I still can't help think that:

    "...reach depths of 6,000 meters, and transmit the data it collects to researchers via a radio link."

    this sort of technology (if it existed) would be much more newsworthy though.

    1. Re:a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly.. Until you get in to extremely long wavelengths and really high power levels, 6,000' of salt water makes a really good RF blocker.

      Perhaps they mean some kind of sonar link or that Boatface has to surface to uplink stuff?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing in there suggests real time transmission.

    3. Re: a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have never read Katherine Giles' doctoral dissertation on subaqueous long-distance propagation of electromagnetic waves and their impact on global warming.

    4. Re:a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrestrial "radio" that isn't "real time" is not radio, it's just a local energy sink aka a space heater.

    5. Re:a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're amazingly stupid. Congratulations on that low bar. What you're erroneously calling "terrestrial" is actually merely confined to the atmosphere. Your level of stupidity is so amazing that I'm impressed that you could spell radio.

    6. Re:a 6km sub-aqua radio link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Terrestrial implies "earth bound". I can refer to "terrestrial clouds" or "terrestrial animals" and it means anything "on Earth" or localized to Earth. That distinction was made, of course, since long distance radio can indeed be quite slow.

      What's with the venom? Bad day at work?

  9. The Fred Durst Society for the Humanities... by Jack9 · · Score: 2

    I was a big fan of naming that waste dump in Austin - The Fred Durst Society for the Humanities and The Arts
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...

    --

    Often wrong but never in doubt.
    I am Jack9.
    Everyone knows me.
  10. Picking Boat Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people often have the urge to name boats a variety of silly and/or obscene joke names, but it is cautioned, extensively, to all wanna-be recreational mariners, "Do you really want to have to say that name over the radio, for example in a distress call?"

    It makes many people rethink things a bit.

    AC

    1. Re:Picking Boat Names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "This is a distress call from the Attenborough!"

      "Who?"

      ".. the ship carrying Boaty McBoatFace"

      "HOLD ON BOATY! WE'LL BE RIGHT THERE!"

  11. The arrogance of the elites by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The continued arrogance of the elitist snobs against a name that most people simply found found, continues to astound me.

    If you like, that choice of the people for lighthearted sanity instead of hrumpfing stodgidity was the earliest indication that Trump would win the election here.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  12. Subby McSubface by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It thought the mini submarine was merely named "Boaty" and not "Boaty McBoatface". The mini sub is typically hauled around by the main ship that was the original target of the naming campaign

    That's double confusing in that it's a submarine, NOT a boat, and second many expected the main ship to have that name.

    They blew it big time, the merchandising and tourist revenue on the ship wouldda been yuuuuuge.

    1. Re:Subby McSubface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, sorry to break it to you, but a submarine very much is called "boat".

    2. Re:Subby McSubface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A submarine is called a "boat".

    3. Re:Subby McSubface by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      That's double confusing in that it's a submarine, NOT a boat, and second many expected the main ship to have that name.

      Submarines are boats.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    4. Re:Subby McSubface by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I didn't know that. I have no recall of anybody using "boat" that way. I guess I don't get out enough.

        - Clueless McBasementFace

    5. Re:Subby McSubface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to rewatch The Hunt For Red October.

    6. Re:Subby McSubface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      das boot-y

    7. Re:Subby McSubface by lgw · · Score: 1

      Yup, even the biggest military subs are "boats". Makes exactly as much sense as any other naval terminology.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Subby McSubface by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But I thought using "boat" was just slang. Cool music, though. Reds had some great composers.

  13. Chinese intercept by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It resembles the one the Chinese recently intercepted, and then later returned.

    If the Chinese capture it, they can rename it, "Finders McKeepersface".

  14. First-ever crossing of the Arctic Ocean under ice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like the nuclear sub USS Nautilus did in 1958? Or is that too long ago to count?

  15. I think the name is brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the name is brilliant, who isn't going to follow the adventures of Boaty McBoatface?

    1. Re: I think the name is brilliant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katherine Giles, for one...

  16. Well at least its not - Trumpy McTrumpFace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it could be worse.. Americans could have voted on it

  17. Surely US and Russian nuclear subs by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    have crossed the Arctic Ocean under ice, for example: http://www.history.com/this-da...

  18. Three? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    "But what many people may not realise is that there is actually more than one Boaty. The name covers a trio of vehicles in the new Autosub Long Range class of underwater robots developed at Southampton's National Oceanography Centre (NOC)."
    Three? My extensive research of Scottish culture left me under the impression that there can be only one!
    I hope this doesn't invalidate the authenticity of my traditional Clan McBoatface tartan kilt.

  19. Author is obviously biased by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    saying that the competition backfired.. just means he doesn't like the name... everyone else did and voted for it.. what a sore looser. Boaty McBoatface is a fun name for such a vessel and it uproots the stuffy wankers who work in the science fields.