Slashdot Mirror


MIT Creates 3D-Printing Robot That Can Construct a Home Off-Grid In 14 Hours (mit.edu)

Kristine Lofgren writes: Home building hasn't changed much over the years, but leave it to MIT to take things to the next level. A new technology built at MIT can construct a simple dome structure in 14 hours and it's powered by solar panels, so you can take it to remote areas. MIT's 3D-printing robot can construct the entire basic structure of a building and can be customized to fit the local terrain in ways that traditional methods can't do. It even has a built-in scoop so it can prepare the building site and gather its own construction materials. You can watch a video of the 3D-printing robot in action here.

62 comments

  1. It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe that's a home in a third world country, but it's fucking garbage anywhere else.

    1. Re:It built a roofless circle. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Seriouskly. This is as much a home as a bunch of logs tied together and propped up against a tree is a home.

    2. Re:It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, when it started making that, I was like, is this a plastic adobe? But then it just stopped. So it wouldn't even be a home in a third world country. It's a windbreak, at best.

      I mean, do we need such a hype headline? It's still pretty fucking exciting. But yea, it is a roofless circle for now.

    3. Re:It built a roofless circle. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I helped my neighbors build their house. The framing (equivalent to what this robot does) took 3 days. The other parts (foundation, wiring, plumbing, flooring, roofing, ducting, painting, fixtures, finishing, etc, etc) took 6 months.

    4. Re:It built a roofless circle. by Humbubba · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I am in awe for what MIT did. Their prototype construction is, to abuse a phrase, the shape of things to come. But I think the Ruskies print a better 3d house now. About: http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-03-04/house-was-3d-printed-under-24-hours-cost-just-10000.

      Their website: http://apis-cor.com/en/

    5. Re:It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many illegals do you have working for you?

    6. Re: It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the real thread.

    7. Re: It built a roofless circle. by Gizan · · Score: 1

      Houses being built down the street from me.are move in ready at the 32-35 day mark, from slab to move in ready.

    8. Re: It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much does that cost in slave money, aka dollars?

      I want a house that makes me a free person, not a fee person.

    9. Re:It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In awe? Not really. There are something like half a dozen other attempts at doing this "additive" construction thing with materials solid enough for house-scale output. So I'm not sure what makes MIT's take special. The solar panels? The thing isn't tethered to some immovable silo and can sod off for a break all by itself? Frankly, watching that video I was waiting for the entire building to be finished, but apparently that's not MIT's thing. So I'll take the Ruskies' house constructor, thanks.

    10. Re:It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone is illegal if the government says so.
      Without governmental intervention everyone would be legal.

      You can't both be against a strong government and at the same time want a government strong enough to throw out people.

    11. Re:It built a roofless circle. by slashrio · · Score: 1

      A dome house would be better.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    12. Re: It built a roofless circle. by mnemotronic · · Score: 1

      your friend is lazy as fuck, i regurally do that shit, a house framing and foundation is 1 week(2 days for framing), coming from an architect

      Don't be a dick. If you're really in the construction business you know that speed of construction is a function of design complexity, the amount of talent and resources thrown at the build, the ability to organize those resources, timing of material delivery and a random "luck" factor. Have 20 talented construction people working full time on a 500 square no-feature efficiency and yea, it's done quick. Put a couple software engineers with limited experience and a mom with 3 kids to work finishing a 2500 square house, part-time, and it will take longer.

      --
      The Russians have won. They have made the world a cesspool of distrust, greed, fear and hate.
    13. Re: It built a roofless circle. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to San Francisco you can live on the sidewalk here in a lovely tent filled with your own excitement and random junk you found/stole. For free!

    14. Re:It built a roofless circle. by mrclevesque · · Score: 1

      "I think the Ruskies print a better 3d house now"

      China?

      30 Greatest 3D Printed Houses & Structures in the World :

      https://all3dp.com/1/3d-printe...

    15. Re:It built a roofless circle. by Humbubba · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. Didn't know there were so many. Good to see Apis Cor made the list. Hey - they got a "Don't Miss" link about those Ruskies. Cool.

  2. Apis Cor companys presentation,.... by Selur · · Score: 4, Informative

    Apis Cor companys presentation (http://apis-cor.com/en/about/news/first-house) from last year seemed more impressive.
    (https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/17/03/10/2255217/3d-printed-house-constructed-on-site-in-one-day)
    Or am I missing something?

    1. Re:Apis Cor companys presentation,.... by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 2

      You missed MIT's intellectual masturbation.

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:Apis Cor companys presentation,.... by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      This is American! Probably patented and everything, too.

  3. Misleading title by guruevi · · Score: 1

    It can create the foam structure in about 14 hours. Then you have to insert your electric wiring and plumbing, then you have to pour over concrete and let it cure - a process that takes ~30 days.

    From the pictures it seems like the thing is stationary with a fairly 'short' arm so you'll be limited by the actual 'size' of the robot, a small igloo-type structure is all it seems to be capable of (although longer arms are probably feasible, they would obviously increase the base cost).

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Misleading title by rtb61 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of concrete. You can construct the basic structure, excluding footings, is just a couple of hours using precast concrete panels as, floors, walls and roof. Then depending upon fit out, it could be finished within a week. To accelerate construction is not that difficult but it is very expensive, even traditional forms of construction can be carried out very quickly, a traditional house quite easily complete in a month. As long as all required materials are all on site at the begging and all required labour is on standby ready to go and you are willing to pay for lighting the construction site to turn night into day and pay for a whole bunch of overtime and idle time. You can get a huge amount of work done in a very short amount of time, as long as you are willing to pay the required premium for it.

      Quickest form of construction would be an inflated structure. A high strength fabric, say a para-armind synthetic fibre cloth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/..., inflated with a lightweight cementitious grout, so walls, roof, ceiling and finishes all in one fell swoop. You could do the same on the moon or even mars, just have to figure out how to turn moon dust (or mars soils) into cement and recover the water to be used again.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Misleading title by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's on caterpillar tracks. It can move. So presumably it could be programmed to produce a straight line or any other arbitrary shape.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Misleading title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Printing in place for these kind of housings seems a bit odd.
      If you want to print in place it is probably because it is problematic to transport machinery and material to the place.
      That would be disaster areas, but the $1000 IKEA shelter is probably easier to transport there than the concrete, water and printer in this case.
      "One shelter is delivered in 2 flat pack boxes, which each weigh about 80 kg." so it can be carried the last distance without too much trouble. And you can transport it on pretty much anything you can find with an engine.

      I don't see how a print-in-place house will compete with that.

      If you need to print it, do it in a controlled environment where you have a lot of resources and transport it to where it is going to be used.

      You can even go for a bit fancier housing if you want to.

    4. Re:Misleading title by mikael · · Score: 1

      It would be better if the robot was a real 3D print/plotter system which could do a complete home with all the concave and convex corners that a real home has.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:Misleading title by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      From the right angle turns on the entrance, it can obviously do that.as long as the rectangular structure fits inside the proscribed sphere the machine can reach.

      However, pipes and domes are actually stronger than boxes tho they have more waste space unless your furniture is custom fitted (like a TV table with a rounded back).

      My question is how much does the foam cost?
      If it costs $20,000 to print $12,000 worth of the house then that's not worth much.

      Is it made from renewable materials?
      If it's not, it won't scale up to the global population.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  4. A much better example by Tempest451 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was a much better presentation of the same principle. https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

  5. Can't play the video since I live in Seattle, ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but I know this isn't a solution until it is cheaper than other building methods. I worked on a 3D concrete printer, and it was nearly six times more expensive than insulated concrete forms which were better than the 3D printer, so I'm skeptical.

  6. There's no cheap land by Ozoner · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is not building a cheap house, the problem is finding somewhere to put it.

    In my country (Australia) countless thousands of acres have been rezoned as "Farming" which means that it is illegal to build on less than 100 acres. The Real Estate Developers have bribed the corrupt councils to pass thousands of regulations which make it impossible to build, and instead force people to buy land in their ticky-tacky developments.

    We have the lowest population density in the world, and the highest house prices.

    1. Re:There's no cheap land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it say that this technology is to make housing more affordable? It might make it cheaper for the developer to construct to make more profit.

    2. Re:There's no cheap land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These can be sent to Mars to build an entire village before the colonists arrive.

    3. Re:There's no cheap land by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      These can be sent to Mars to build an entire village before the colonists arrive.

      Because expando-foam is a wonderfully air-tight, radiation-proof, and easy to make material on the surface of Mars.

    4. Re:There's no cheap land by slashrio · · Score: 1

      I think The Netherlands have much higher house prices, and surely a higher population density.

      --
      "Trump!!", the new Godwin.
    5. Re:There's no cheap land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw an advert in the back pages of a magazine of a guy who offered to micro-print a 3D home on any plot in the state for only $150. I called him up, booked an appointment. He drove up bang on time, took out a fold-up table and 3D printer. Then he proceeded to print a 3D micro-scale model of our home, then demanded payment.

    6. Re: There's no cheap land by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you called him out there to do it so you owe him money. WTF did you think microprint meant? He was gonna print one micron at a time? Yeah right.

  7. 14 hours for that? by weedjams · · Score: 1

    give me a helper that can use a tape measure, circular saw, and nailgun and we'll build you something 10 times as nice in 4 hours. hide your face MIT, this is cringe-worthy.

    1. Re:14 hours for that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yup, thats about the gist of it, and i got 200 workers and an architecture firm ... i mean i wish the technology lived up to it, but at current its like, if i really wanted to do that i could and better in haf a day drunk off my ass ... so i mean like, its gonna have to get significantly better

  8. My connection is too slow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to play the video, but I know this is a joke until it costs the same or less than a normally built house.

  9. Couldn't play the video since I live in Seattle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and don't have an Internet connection fast enough to play YouTube videos, but I won't believe this until I see it and see the cost per sq ft.

  10. Re: Can't play the video since I live in Seattle, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here. Couldn't get it to play, after working in this field for over a decade, I know this claim is ridiculous.

  11. yea so? by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    The basic structure is the fastest/cheapest part of building a house (and likely cheaper then this will ever be). It's all the rest of that takes time and money.
    You can also do it by hand, rather then hauling some expensive machine around that will be stolen from

    deployed to remote regions, for example in the developing world, or to areas for disaster relief after a major storm or earthquake

    also

    to provide durable shelter rapidly.

    What's wrong with tents and cots? Yes I've slept in a tent in the winter in Canada.

    Stick it on wheels and have it autonomously print the foam structure for a house foundation ready to pour concrete and I'm interested. It may not be cheaper, but quicker for mass production of subdivisions.

  12. This is amazing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    and we will totally colonize Mars now. Elon Musk will pack a 14-hour MIT 3D printer to 3D print his retirement condo on Mars. Totally gonna happen.

    We don't have the Concorde anymore and the only technology that has improved in the last half-century is information processing, but we're totally gonna be a multi-planet species.

    I read about it.

    1. Re:This is amazing by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. Ink pens have become substantially better in the last half-century.

      --
      Caution: Contents under pressure
  13. Re: Can't play the video since I live in Seattle, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This, but I know since this is several times more expensive, it will count for nothing.

  14. House Raising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the Appalachians, there are still house raisings, and starting with a foundation, we get 2 story houses framed, sheeted, wrapped, sided, roof deck, tar paper and shingles on, and rough electrical and plumbing done in a day. It's a long day, not an 8 hour day, but it's quite doable. Then you have to wait for an inspector to see all of that, and the long slow part, drywall, flooring, finish plumbing and electrical, hvac and painting.

  15. Ah, technological progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The best thing about technological progress is that a herd of morons who've never had a useful thought in their lives, who meander about and graze on whatever slop is thrust into their troughs, gets to voice their disdain for the achievements of people expanding the boundaries of human knowledge and achievement in sciences and the useful arts.

    If your first thought was "but it doesn't have a roof", then you are useless and should consider a career in management. You lack the intelligence, creativity and experience to appreciate progress and this is a prerequisite, maybe the only prerequisite, for creating technology.

  16. So by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    Eventually these smart kids will figure on putting more than one arm on the thing and cutting the build time in 1/2, 1/4, etc. As well as allowing them to do more than just one shape.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:So by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Imagine what you can do with a metric ton of "great stuff" and a scrambler from an amusement park.

    2. Re:So by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 1

      Not in the U.S.!

      Only imperial tons are allowed.

  17. Blame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Call Killy.

  18. California in the US is similiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go find a county with limited zoning out here. Some have lax enforcement (at least until they need a windfall of cash...) But by and large, even in the supposedly 'Hippie' counties, like Humboldt, Siskiyou, etc up north. Or like San Bernadino, Mojave, etc in the South, the permitting to build or rebuild a house (or simply get current permits for all those shifty repairs a previous tenant did that you now need to 'fix up to code')may cost you thousands to tens of thousands of dollars. Gone are the days where someone could move out into the sticks and build their own home, or a community of homes without running afoul of the law. :(

  19. Norton Install by joypit · · Score: 0

    Activate and install your norton online just by visiting www.Norton.com/setup. If you need help on activation and installation please call USA 1-855-408-6697 for USA and +44 800-088-5029 for UK and 1-855-408-6697 for Australlia.

  20. A house for the 3 little pigs by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    All this does is spray a foam plastic dome onto a pre-prepared surface.

    There are no foundations, no weatherproofing, nothing apart from the foam's natural adhesion to keep it in place. To claim this as some sort of "progress" fails to recognise that a few people could erect a similar sized tent in much less time.

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
  21. DEAD TRADES by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Home and office builders and trades people are on the list of occupations about to vanish.

  22. Clicked the link, didn't see a building by DrXym · · Score: 1
    The robot managed to build a giant letter C in expanding foam. It is FAR from being a habitable building built in a day. It has no poured concrete (or steel reinforcers), no floor, no roof, no internal / external rendering, no windows, no plumbing, wiring, no damp seal, no partitions etc.

    All of that implies a team of builders turning up to finish what the robot started. And that kind of begs the question how much benefit was derived from hauling out a giant robot arm and tanker of foam in the first place. Building techniques such as insulated concrete formwork is already a thing and does more or less the same thing except to any shape and to a better finish.

  23. Don't do in Florida... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...being off off-grid is illegal.

  24. Re:Can't play the video since I live in Seattle, . by Mr+D+from+63 · · Score: 1

    but I know this isn't a solution until it is cheaper than other building methods. I worked on a 3D concrete printer, and it was nearly six times more expensive than insulated concrete forms which were better than the 3D printer, so I'm skeptical.

    Cost was clearly not a factor. If it were they wouldn't have added a useless solar panel barely big enough to power a hair dryer.

  25. disposable/recyclable house? by zr · · Score: 1

    wouldn't it be great to be able to get some land, build a "starter house", make some kids, build a new bigger one with more bedrooms, kick kids out to college, demo and build a smaller house better suited for retirement..

    if you like your neighborhood you can keep it :)

  26. how fast does the foam degrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wondering if this will still be there in a year...also about 12oz of the "Great Stuff" is $5 at Home Depot...they must get a volume discount.

  27. Actually it is much worse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The building appears to be made of expanding foam with only one exit. Winnie Mandela could not have thought of a more dangerous fire hazard.

  28. I just wasted 90 precious seconds of my life by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    For some over sized masters level project that quite frankly isn't worth the time of day to anyone but the person who dreamed it up (nutty professor), the grad student who scratched the professor's itch, and the googly eyed parents who are sharing the video link to all their buddies on Facebook.

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  29. Mars by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    where is this for ? If it is for disaster relief it seems to me there would be no shortage of labor, send them something they can use to make their own houses. If it is for some distant planet then make a cave build-out robot.

    --
    Nullius in verba