Slashdot Mirror


Federal Agents Used a Stingray To Track an Immigrant's Phone (detroitnews.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Investigators from Immigration and Custom Enforcement as well as the FBI have been using controversial cell-spoofing devices to secretly track down undocumented immigrants, court records show. According to a report the Detroit News, which obtained an unsealed federal search warrant affidavit, FBI and ICE agents in Michigan used a Stingray device to ensnare a restaurant worker from El Salvador in March. The devices, which were originally intended for counter-terrorism use, have come under fire because there are currently no clear rules governing when law enforcement is allowed to deploy them. Even in cases where authorities have a clear target in mind, they run the risk of exposing personal information of other innocent people in range. Until 2015, Federal investigators were free to deploy the devices without a search warrant. At that point the Justice Department laid out a policy requiring investigators get approval to use the devices first.

103 comments

  1. Feel good story of the day? by Flentil · · Score: 1

    Your tax dollars at work

    1. Re:Feel good story of the day? by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      As has been said before: Anything that is not forbidden is mandatory.

    2. Re:Feel good story of the day? by rmdingler · · Score: 2
      If there's anything to feel good about, it's that the law now requires at least a search warrant to be deployed. Though the level of evidence required to attain a judge's signature will continue to vary by administration, alleged offense, and even what circuit the request is logged in, it's still better than pre-2015 when it was up to the discretion of law enforcement.

      I may be jaded, but I simply assume if a technology is at the disposal of investigators, it will be deployed. Any legislation that requires the LEO's to explain what their doing is a win.

      Beware the Boogeymem: Illegal immigrants, Pedobears, and Terrorists. These are the cause du jour where exception to normal protocol is initially permitted, and each time you stoop to a distasteful act, it becomes that much easier to stoop again.

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    3. Re:Feel good story of the day? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      If there's anything to feel good about, it's that the law now requires at least a search warrant to be deployed.

      Exactly. I don't might the feds spying on me as long as it for a good cause, like stopping people from illegal waitressing.

    4. Re:Feel good story of the day? by someone1234 · · Score: 2

      Won't that make America great again?

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    5. Re: Feel good story of the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "a restaurant worker from El Salvador"

      No, it's going to make it worse, you numskull.

      Who now is going to make me the best food in ever?

      In ever!!!

    6. Re:Feel good story of the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not only illegal waitressing, but they could not have got hired without providing a Social Security number (which has to false). Falsifying government records is a felony, not to mention identity theft. But, you know, it's ok to victimize innocent people just because that's the only way to get away with breaking the law.

    7. Re:Feel good story of the day? by marcgvky · · Score: 0

      Why is this even a story? Becuase MsMash is a bleeding heart libtard? Gimme a break.

    8. Re: Feel good story of the day? by Type44Q · · Score: 2

      I think we should refer to drug dealers as "undocumented pharmacists."

    9. Re:Feel good story of the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking wettbackk narco.MEX and nibberizing lib.comz is always money well spent.

    10. Re:Feel good story of the day? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 0

      providing a Social Security number (which has to false). Falsifying government records is a felony

      So he printed a little piece of paper and then used it to GET A JOB? Golly, that is serious. I am certainly willing to give up my privacy rights to stop things like terrorist truck bombs and questionable job applications, since those two things are basically the same.

    11. Re:Feel good story of the day? by Flentil · · Score: 2

      providing a Social Security number (which has to false). Falsifying government records is a felony

      So he printed a little piece of paper and then used it to GET A JOB? Golly, that is serious. I am certainly willing to give up my privacy rights to stop things like terrorist truck bombs and questionable job applications, since those two things are basically the same.

      If the SS number just happens to match your SS#, now you've got problems with the IRS and possibly your credit rating and maybe a life changing cascade of bad shit you need to sort out as a result of this little bit of identity theft. Completely harmless, right? I guess you never thought this through, or you just don't give a fuck because you expect all that to happen to someone else, not you.

    12. Re:Feel good story of the day? by Imrik · · Score: 1

      I'm less concerned about them having a good reason than I am about them having to leave a paper trail stating their reason, good or not.

    13. Re:Feel good story of the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true. She could have conspired with her employer to evade taxes and act as an accessory to commit fraud (the books).

    14. Re: Feel good story of the day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we should refer to drug dealers as "undocumented pharmacists."

      Is there any reason not to aside from sounding stupid or being some piece of shit copsucking drug warrior?

  2. The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real problem is that phones send so much data unencrypted. Stupid old-tech design. Software systems designed by idiotic hardware engineers that think they're smarter than they are.

  3. 1984 by PoopJuggler · · Score: 1

    Just one step away from using these to round up political dissenters and whistleblowers.

    1. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what is difference? How is citizen dissenter like illegal alien invader?

    2. Re: 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's just me, but I don't think I'd classify a restaurant worker as an invader...

    3. Re: 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I were to enter your house, start living there, and eat food from your refrigerator, you're saying you would not consider me an invader and wouldn't do anything to have me removed?

      Illegal aliens were not invited into this country and they steal resources from Americans. See the government services in Spanish? That costs extra money that taxpayers have to pay for. If you know any physicians that work at a hospital, ask them how much bills the hospital has to "eat" because of illegal aliens. Then consider that the hospitals just raise the prices of health care on people who actually pay for their incurred expenses.

      Let's not even talk about affirmative action policies that will ultimately favor illegal immigrants over Americans. It is an absolute outrage that outsiders are treated better than Americans in our own country, especially when there are many Americans who really could use some help.

    4. Re: 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but they were invited, and speaking of Spanish language speakers, there are millions of them who can claim descent from people living in the area where they reside, before the USA took control.

      What gives you the right to tell the Spanish-speaking people of Puerto Rico to change the language they speak? Or Florida? Or Texas, California, New Mexico, Colorado, and Arizona?

      And really, when are you going to let the Hawaiians, Dutch, and Swedes have their rights?

      As for medical bills, I'll believe you care about that when I stop seeing hospitals spending tens of thousands of landscaping and fountains. Not to mention the salaries of executives who don't even see patients.

      Besides, you're not going to win any claims about affirmative action when the racism and bigotry continues, from gerrymandering to imprisonment.

    5. Re: 1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a country isn't a house, it's more like a restaurant. You're analogy is overly simplified in that it fails to acknowledge that those same "invaders" work in our fields, in our restaurants, in jobs that "Americans in our own country... who could really use the help" won't do because they think they're above those menial jobs. A better analogy would have been black people going in to a white-only restaurant in the 50's, paying their bills only to be thrown out because they weren't invited to that restaurant. While illegal immigrants might be in the country illegally, that DOES NOT mean that they do not contribute to our economy or our society.

      American citizens can be and are Spanish only speakers. When taking the citizenship test, you don't have to take the English test if you're over 50. You could have been born to a Spanish-speaking family in a Spanish-speaker dominant region. The reason we have bilingual signs isn't because of Illegal Spanish immigrants, it's because Spanish is almost as common as English in some regions. Are you trying to tell me that 38% of the California population are illegal immigrants? 47% of the New Mexico population? Because if that's what you think... I am sorry for you.

      Hospitals have to eat the bills of anybody without insurance that won't pay, including poor people of every ethnicity, illegal immigrants and the homeless. Should we just send our poor and homeless down to Mexico too, while we're at it?

      And then you just go off the rails a bit. Affirmative action that *will* favor illegal immigrants? What kind of affirmative action is that? Please, enumerate for me the ways that illegal immigrants are "treated better than Americans in our own country?" I'll be waiting.

    6. Re: 1984 by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      It's not unless you're a tightwad business owner who's after the cheapest possible labor at all costs.

  4. Warrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sooooo... These guys are upset that the Feds followed the law and got a warrant???

    1. Re:Warrant by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sooooo... These guys are upset that the Feds followed the law and got a warrant???

      Except we were promised these things won't be used except for matters of national security.

      Also, Stingrays have no way to selectively MitM only the target, so they spy (in violation of the 4th Amendment) on every single innocent person in a large radius.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    2. Re:Warrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sooooo... These guys are upset that the Feds followed the law and got a warrant???

      More like why did the Feds feel it necessary to intercept the cell communications and disrupt service for thousands of people to catch an illegal immigrant when they clearly already knew where he was. Unless of course they dragnetted the entire city to find him, which means they disrupted and intercepted service for tens or hundreds of thousands of people.

      A restaurant worker's not exactly a threat to national security. They're using a sledgehammer to swat a fly because they can.

    3. Re: Warrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No it's he fact that resources are spent on finding illegals even though the amount of violent crime and murders have reduced dramatically since the 1990s even though we had a huge influx of illegals. Lazy government wants to capture restaurant workers instead of rapists and murderers. Many rape cases are not even investigated, let alone solved. In some cities even homicides are not looked at properly. Now we want to spend resources hunting restaurant workers? Assuming 1% of illegals are violent criminals (a number way higher than real) that means you have to deport 100 people per reducing by one violent criminal .. that is massively inefficient -- not to mention the criminal gets to do crime in home country. Second, illegals are more likely to be victims of violent crime therefore they in a sense may by being victims themselves reduce the violent crime effect on natives (sort of like taking the bullet). My point -- tracking down illegals is a waste of resources and not an effective method of tackling violent crime.

    4. Re:Warrant by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      Sooooo... These guys are upset that the Feds followed the law and got a warrant???

      No. We are upset that the law allows the feds to do this at all. Here is the 4th Amendment:

      The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

      The "location" should not be "within 5 km of our stingray" and the persons should not be "everybody in range".

    5. Re:Warrant by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Waves of illegal aliens IS a national security matter.

    6. Re:Warrant by Flentil · · Score: 1

      Sooooo... These guys are upset that the Feds followed the law and got a warrant???

      Except we were promised these things won't be used except for matters of national security.

      Also, Stingrays have no way to selectively MitM only the target, so they spy (in violation of the 4th Amendment) on every single innocent person in a large radius.

      You don't think foreigners sneaking into our country illegally is a matter of national security? It's the definition of national security you dolt.

    7. Re:Warrant by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Waves of illegal aliens IS a national security matter.

      The "waves of illegal aliens" ended more than a decade ago. Net immigration from Mexico is near zero.

      More Mexicans leaving than coming to the US

    8. Re:Warrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Based upon a Mexican survey that no diligent person would take seriously. Yet this statistic has been bandied about to support the assertion you made. News flash. Surveys are not very good for determining facts about people who are acting illegally and are no longer in the area of the survey. There is no question there was a great increase in the number of undocumented (illegal) immigrants up to 2012. After this time the actual counting was suppressed. It is entirely possible the figures have dropped just recently due to poor US economic performance but should performance increase then it is highly likely the numbers will continue to rise as that was the situation for the past 40 years.It is also possible if methods used in the past are reestablished, thus providing a continuous methodology, then the numbers could show there really hasn't been a decline. Oh, and Mexico is only one of many countries south of the border.

  5. Dear Illegals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got Trumped!

    XoXo,
    America

    1. Re: Dear Illegals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure it's not his voters that got Trump'd?

    2. Re: Dear Illegals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the illegals are pawns. Trump voters, OTOH, had a choice, and chose....wrongly...

      (hilly wasn't great, but status quo vs toddler temper tantrums ?)

  6. Curious about the history with this guy by TWX · · Score: 1

    I'm a bit curious as to this guy's history given the technology used to find him. Seems like a questionable use of resources to nab a busboy. Given that they didn't tell us why he was deported the previous two times I'm curious if they used it simply because he simply was two-time deportee that keeps coming back, or if he had any history of criminal activity involved in any of his deportation orders.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Re; Stingray for a deportation..

      Why is this bad? He was in the USA illegally and shouldn't be here. Some unemployed high school or college kid (which we are neck deep in in this country) could maybe have had that 'busboy' job instead..

      Kudos on ICE on finding him and deporting him.

    2. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by alvinrod · · Score: 2

      I'd argue that using a Stingray inside the U.S. at all is a violation of the U.S. Constitution. Whether or not a person agrees with the outcome shouldn't matter at all.

      If they know where he's working, just scoop him up after he gets off of work. If ICE is getting that lazy, maybe they should hire some Mexicans. I've heard they're pretty hard working.

    3. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person attesting for the search warrant is assigned to the Violent Gang Task Force. That may provide some hint as to why the three time boarder jumper, drunk driving, hit and run busboy came up on their radar.

    4. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by bmo · · Score: 1

      Seems like a questionable use of resources to nab a busboy.

      It's more expensive and dangerous to go after members of MS13, instead of Jose Busboy.

      But hey, the CIA needs MS13, so I guess they're just fine.

      http://www.duffelblog.com/2015...

      Gotta fund the unofficial wars /somehow/.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by tsqr · · Score: 1

      I'm a bit curious as to this guy's history given the technology used to find him. Seems like a questionable use of resources to nab a busboy. Given that they didn't tell us why he was deported the previous two times I'm curious if they used it simply because he simply was two-time deportee that keeps coming back, or if he had any history of criminal activity involved in any of his deportation orders.

      This says he was first apprehended in 2005, but wasn't deported (the first time) until 2012. Possibly when he was first snagged he was released with an order to appear for a hearing, and then skipped the hearing; this is fairly common with the "catch and release" protocol that's been in use for some time. But that's just a guess.

      When you say, "I'm curious if they used it simply because he simply was two-time deportee that keeps coming back, or if he had any history of criminal activity involved in any of his deportation orders," are you taking the position that the crime of illegal entry doesn't count as illegal activity?

      The first time a person is caught for illegal entry, it's a federal misdemeanor. If the person is deported and re-enters illegally it's a federal felony, and that usually results in immediate deportation, which happened in 2014. He re-entered illegally again, and DHS caught him because of his involvement in a hit-and-run incident, and that's when the Stingray was used. So no, he wasn't deported for taking a citizen's busboy job.

    6. Re: Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hasn't too wide a net been asked and answered re the implementation of wiretap? Those listening in are supposed to turn off recording if the call is personal. How is this any different?

    7. Re: Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know how Stingrays work (and also how cell towers work), clearly. The reason using a Stingray is always bad because A) it mass collects data (and therefore violates the 4th Amendment rights of every US citizen within 5 miles) B) it mass connects cell phones (and therefore prevents every US citizen in 5 miles from using their cell phone) and C) it further burns intelligence gathering techniques (because now everyone knows we can do it... which is why it was classified in the first place).

      Is that reason enough for you?

    8. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that there's too many jobs. There's not enough pressure to stop breeding. Solve the problem by eliminating those high school or college kids to begin with.

    9. Re: Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... did you just link to duffleblog? You know that's a parody site... right?

    10. Re: Curious about the history with this guy by bmo · · Score: 1

      Aw shit...

      I got Poe's Lawed.

      Oh well, fuckit.

      The main point still stands.

      --
      BMO

    11. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a questionable use of resources to nab a busboy.

      Maybe if someone you loved was killed by the busboy who thinks it is "ok" to drive drunk and
      leave the scene of an accident, you wouldn't think the use of resources was so "questionable".

      Of course you don't think much anyway, that is obvious from the idiocy you wrote.

    12. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re; Stingray for a deportation..

      Why is this bad? He was in the USA illegally and shouldn't be here. Some unemployed high school or college kid (which we are neck deep in in this country) could maybe have had that 'busboy' job instead..

      Kudos on ICE on finding him and deporting him.

      Cost vs benefit analysis needed.

      How many man-hours of investigator time plus the cost of the equipment used plus whatever else is involved that we don't know about vs the value of that crap-job to the citizen who should have had it.

      On the face of it... I think we lost here.

    13. Re: Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... I don't even know what you're main point is because I'm don't listen to people that link parody sites as references. But good job making an ass of yourself.

    14. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by TWX · · Score: 1

      Where did I say anything about taking a citizen's job?

      I was curious if, besides illegal entry, he did anything wrong. He did. Based on what additional information you've provided I wonder if he close to leave the scene of an accident because of fear of being deported again if he spoke with police, during this particular episode of illegal entry.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    15. Re: Curious about the history with this guy by bmo · · Score: 1

      Then foe me, and never see my posts again.

      Thanks.

      --
      BMO

    16. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Cost vs benefit analysis needed.

      How many man-hours of investigator time plus the cost of the equipment used plus whatever else is involved that we don't know about vs the value of that crap-job to the citizen who should have had it.

      Don't forget to include the value of the jobs lost vs. saved due to this actions effect on the perception of whether the law is being enforced or ignored by the authorities.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    17. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      I expect they set up stingrays near locations commonly used by illegals and set it to scan for known illegals phone numbers (imsi catcher), and give an alert when found. This would be a simple and effective way to find lots of illegals, and more selective than having traffic stops to check for "Mexican" looking drivers.

    18. Re:Curious about the history with this guy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's really fun to spy on people and see what they do when they think no one is around. And they get paid to do it!

      I used to have a shit ton of security cameras at my old shop and loved watching people around the area. Not that I think it's okay to do or anything, but it sure is cool if your the spy and not the victim.

  7. Oh noes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh noes, please don't catch undocumented immigrants. Only Nazis want a functional immigration system.

  8. DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 5, Informative

    >> "only brushes with the law involve drunken driving allegations and a hit-and-run crash"

    Um...if the dude's that dangerous, yes, please, kick him out. There are plenty of cooks that aren't threats to innocent people.

    1. Re:DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I think your vehicle should be taken from you and not returned after you get to 4 DWIs. Same with texting while driving.

      This is in addition to all the standard mandatory counseling and jail time they normally get at that stage.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    2. Re:DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why was an anti-terrorism tool used to chase an individual who hasn't even committed a felony? Why was the money spent on electronic surveillance of a person whose lcoation was known, vs chasing down Jeffrey Dahmer Jr.? Why are you suddenly OK with misuse of funds when it tangentally punishes a small timer from El Salvador?

    3. Re:DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by DaHat · · Score: 1

      *Only* 4 DWIs?

    4. Re:DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In NY, first DWI gets a breath tester in car. Reduction to a "ability impaired" is possible but grudgingly given, and only to first timers with lower BAC. Second one is a Felony, and if you bomb out your three years probation (not necessary to drive drunk again) then you see Jail.

      They were after this guy for other reasons...he isn't some "innocent cook". There are a lot of illegals out there. My job brings me into contact with them. If you went to some of my Courts, 1/3 would be "undoc". Most illegals aren't actually crims, except for the immigration status, but then with fake socials and fake driver's licenses ring up misdemeanor and felony charges due to fake documents. Toss in a few traffic tickets for minor stuff and you are "agg unlicensed" and THEN you get arrested.

      I'm old school enough that you shouldn't be illegal. You came, you over stayed, you knew. The kids I have some sympathy for, but the reality is that our Imm system has been gamed...all those kids sent over ? Folk knew it risky, but once they learned that INS would send the kids to relatives in the US, we got a flood of kids sent over...back in the day, you had to boat over..and if you were rejected, the shipping company HAD TO send you back. With modern transportation, once you clear customs on a visitor visa, they have no way to get you back....

    5. Re:DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      On your 4th offense and every one thereafter.

      For whatever reason it's a widely accepted and any less than 3 offenses people will try to defend them driving drunk but by the fourth offense at least imho it's indefensible.

      Something should have been done after the first three you shouldn't be able to get to four without a lot of dedication.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
    6. Re:DUI and hit and run are not serious crimes? by sims+2 · · Score: 1

      I'm just talking about dwis in general but as far as illegals driving they should be subject to to traffic laws just the same as any citizen.

      --
      Minimum threshold fixed. Thanks!
  9. Clearly... by bmo · · Score: 0

    " FBI and ICE agents in Michigan used a Stingray device to ensnare a restaurant worker from El Salvador in March. "

    Clearly he was a threat to all of the patrons of that restaurant by not having the proper paperwork.[sneer]

    It's obvious that ICE and the FBI are going after the low-hanging fruit to look "productive" instead of "protecting us"

    I feel so protected because they're going after Jose or Josephine immigrant that poses no threat to anyone.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re: Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about his drunk driving?
      Still feel good with him here?
      How about his hit and run?
      Still fine with him here?
      Idiot.

    2. Re:Clearly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel so protected because they're going after Jose or Josephine immigrant that poses no threat to anyone.

      --
      BMO

      The government doesn't care whether your stupidity prevents you from realizing the illegal in question
      poses a threat to the citizens of the US.

      Drunk driving, FELONY hit-and-run, and FELONY re-entry after deportation are each more than reason
      enough to make the illegal who was tracked and arrested worthy of attention from law enforcement.

      Some day if you ever reach adulthood you will realize just what an idiot you were on days like today.

  10. Equivalency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems pretty simple. If law enforcement is allowed to do it without a warrant, then any citizen is allowed to do it. Including doing it to law enforcement.

    1. Re:Equivalency by DaHat · · Score: 1

      You should talk to the FCC about that then.

  11. Need to fix cell phone protocols by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The fact that such a device exists is clear evidence that the protocols for cellular phones need to be fixed so that they will only connect to a master list of cellular towers that are in specific locations. What you may not know about cellular phones is that much more than this is possible. You can push an "update' from a tower to your cell phone and it's all done without any consent. Even if you have the latest security focused Blackphone, your phone will still accept any update pushed to your phone by any tower. The reason for this is that the baseband modem functions independently and always trusts that the network is not compromised.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Need to fix cell phone protocols by buss_error · · Score: 1

      will only connect to a master list of cellular towers

      Then they'd just order the cell site operators to include their stingray devices as "allowed". While there are security issues with the cell network, the biggest issue is unrestrained "law enforcement" breaking the law themselves.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
    2. Re:Need to fix cell phone protocols by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      will only connect to a master list of cellular towers

      Then they'd just order the cell site operators to include their stingray devices as "allowed".

      Which is why you would include GPS info about each tower. It's also why you would only update that list every few months, so it wouldn't be something they could push to your phone.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re: Need to fix cell phone protocols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you are saying it's a whitelist created and maintained by somebody like apk? Or maybe Theo at OpenBSD should be in charge of it?

    4. Re:Need to fix cell phone protocols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have the good fortune to live in some kind of libertarian utopiia. Here in the USA the Feds would never let any of your schemes lock them out of monitoring whatever they want to monitor.

  12. Undocumented = easy win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of finding the illegals doing violent crime, it's much easier to find the ones who are working in restaurants, construction, and farms. This is the Arpaio model of leading in sex offenders not being caught but large numbers of non-violent illegals captured. It helps to selectively highlight crime by illegals to make it look like the violent crime rate is going up when actually illegal immigration has reduced crime. Especially when you account for the rate of illegal immigrants being the victims of violent crime.

    Yup find the easy to capture illegals and let the violent ones roam free .. that plays well in the right wing media but it isn't exactly helping the country. Also what will the 15,000 member deportation force of the department of homeland security do once they have few illegals to deport?

  13. Watch out, before they start listening US Citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait, they already do. Tell me again why it is wrong for police to track somebody who violated the law and suck into the country?

  14. I don't carry a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So Stingray doesn't affect me.

  15. FBI track people doing illegal stuff with warrant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How is that news? I'm fine with the FBI using whatever they can to track illegal acts regardless of them being an illegal immigrant or something else.
    I'm an immigrant myself - as in not an American citizen living in the US. Do you know how much it takes to move to the US legally?

    Why would people be able to enter illegally and get away with it. Because feelings? Talk about privilege..

    The people make the country. People who can't follow rules and due process will also do anything to get by and produce much less than they consume - which means lower GDP at the end of the day. That's why we have third worlds and first worlds. And yes -being born in another country might put you as a disadvantage. Even with all the education in the world, if your culture is fucked up and you lived in it since birth these things are engraved irreversibly in your brain - western culture, it turns out, is the one that gets the closest to equality of opportunities though. The people who do not understand that probably think people migrate to the US because it's magic land and being on it's soil magically make your happy and wealthy. They also probably never had to wonder if they'll die tomorrow because and only fight against it because it make them feel good. How selfish.

    I don't know or heard of a single person that lived through that which did not agree on these fundamentals. zero. that includes the illegal immigrants.

  16. Re: FBI track people doing illegal stuff with warr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that we have limited money and resources, you rather we go after the illegal than investigate rapes and murder cases. There are thousands of rape cases that have not even been investigated (let alone solved). How about clearing the rape kit backlog before hunting down restaurant workers? You are allowing violent crime to reign freely while going after the easy targets like restaurant workers that are causing negligible if any harm. It is illogical.

  17. " secretly track down undocumented immigrants"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were they to post notices on restaurant door to avoid "secretly"?
    Not immigrants but invaders! Immigrants have documents. When subversives in media cause us to use wrong terms, our thinking is subverted. If you invade Mexico, will you be put in prison as "undocumented immigrant" or criminal?

  18. Start making your politicans accountable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its a fishing net type of tech. Have neutral industry experts brief your congress and have the debate.

  19. There are "security issues" with POTS too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copper wire can be tapped with solely physical access. In the central office, or anywhere between. Ultra-lo tech. Could easily listen to a bunch of conversations on that copper.

    Stingray is just a different means of wire-tap.

    1. Re: There are "security issues" with POTS too by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Stingray wiretaps and stores all traffic in a locality. So its more like the agent wiretapping every phone in a ten block area.

  20. Re: FBI track people doing illegal stuff with warr by getuid() · · Score: 1

    "Follow the rules and you'll be fine" rhetoric - check.

    "Work builds character" rhetoric - check.

    "Equal chances" bull$h1t - check.

    "Cultural supremacy 'cuz we fucking deserve it" BS - check.

    "I know I'm right because I used to be one of $THEM, but then I saw the light" - BINGO!

  21. So PUT THIS GOV'T IN CHARGE OF HEALTH CARE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will somebody explain to me why the people who get all up in arms when the US government does something like this tend to be the ones that turn around and want to give that same government even MORE power by turning over another 20% or so of the US GDP to direct control of that same government?

    You don't trust the government with Stingrays, but you do trust them with your health care?

    WTF?!?!?!

    1. Re:So PUT THIS GOV'T IN CHARGE OF HEALTH CARE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you really too stupid to know that we want the government to do good things, and not to do bad things?

      Let's try this..

      You don't trust teachers to fuck students, yet you want to teach them english and math?

      Jesus Christ. Are you fucking retarded or something?

      Is reading Breitbart the modern equivalent of huffing gasoline?

      You knuckle dragging retards are extremely fucking stupid.

  22. I am O.K. with this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I still want a wall.

  23. Stupid Reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Again science fiction as reporting.
    All the device can do is to mimic a cell site forcing mobiles in the immediate area to automously register giving a list of mobile serial numbers and mobile station identity. And the mobile station identity belongs to the provider not the subscriber and gets assigned when the mobile is activated. The serial number or MEID says nothing about the mobile except its manufacturer. No Mobile Directory Number, no "personal information", no voice or data capture. It cannot act like a man-in-the-middle as it has to redirect the mobiles to the real cell sites for calling to work. And that assumes the the device is not overloaded when all the mobiles that can hear it register simultaneously. Additionally it needs to do this over at least 2 carriers for CDMA and more for LTE. And it will miss any mobile already on a call until that call ends or a data session goes dormant.

    What it is good for is to collect the possible mobile information of any suspects in the area which would allow by elimination find the specific information you actually need for a court order to do a CALEA/LAES tap.

  24. Re: FBI track people doing illegal stuff with warr by sexconker · · Score: 1

    The person in question was involved with DUIs and a hit and run.
    I'm find with expending some resources to round him up.

    The fact that he's an illegal immigrant just means he'll be deported (yet again) instead being incarcerated here.

  25. No matter what item you give them for war. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One day will be used on you.

  26. They're illegals - not undocumented. by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no defense for allowing illegals in this country, much less the crimes they commit.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:They're illegals - not undocumented. by Required+Snark · · Score: 1
      Crimes like paying taxes (Social Security, unemployment) and not getting any benefits from those tax dollars.

      You are obviously in the Representative Steve King (R Iowa) wing of the Republican Party: "For every one who's a valedictorian, there's another 100 out there who weigh 130 pounds—and they've got calves the size of cantaloupes because they're hauling 75 pounds of marijuana across the desert."

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    2. Re:They're illegals - not undocumented. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      come on, a low-wage worker has some hundreds deducted, but has a "right" to 100s of thousands in education and healthcare, besides whatever else they draw from tax-funded anti-American groups. Even those activist admit that Americans will support foreigners for at least two generations.

  27. Re: FBI track people doing illegal stuff with warr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, follow the rules that everyone else had to follow.
    They should deport him by catapult this time, maybe light him on fire for effect.

  28. Stingray by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why care? Track Immigrant OMG! Must be a violation of those illegal rights. Uh?

  29. Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Immigrant's Phone"? You mean illegal immigrant.

    1. Re:Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Havent you received the last Newspeak dictionaries?

  30. A few questions by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    Stingrays transmit on licensed frequencies, that are legally restricted to a specific phone company. It's illegal for anyone else to use them. Without a warrant I don't see how the police can legally ignore federal law and use those frequencies. Stingrays work by intercepting phone calls (voice and meta-data) and re-routing them through their equipment. How can they tap phones without a warrant?

    1. Re:A few questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly. how is that att or verizon not bitching?

  31. It's all esthetic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I know why you call yourself Shanghi !

  32. Illegal Aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and only those who have committed an aggravated crime on top of it. Fake News here. Move Along.

  33. How could you possibly investigate future voters? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry from the DNC on down there will be quick action to stop this practice. How could law enforcement possibly prosecute, or kick out, future Democratic voters? Unheard of! Ridiculous! And, unfortunately, a fact.

  34. False Premise! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The false premise begins where the writer uses the term "undocumented Immigrant". The correct and proper term is "illegal alien". That is a person who has entered the United States illegally or has over stayed their permitted time to remain in the United States.

    These people are breaking the law of the land by way of their presence. It doesn't matter if you feel the law is unreasonable or if you don't feel that the law should be enforced. The FACT is that they are breaking the law and subject to imprisonment and or deportation.

    "Undocumented immigrants" are ILLEGAL ALIENS. Their very presence is a criminal act.

    I have precisely ZERO ISSUE with these agencies acquiring a warrant and using a stingray to capture and prosecute this ILLEGAL ALIEN.

    I'll go a step further and say that since he is an illegal alien, I do not believe that he should enjoy any protections of our laws, beyond natural and human rights laws. So, I don't think he deserves an protections such as requiring a warrant or right to due process or anything else.

    Illegal ALIEN captured. Deport. The end.