Slashdot Mirror
Anthem To Pay $115 Million In The Largest Data Breach Settlement Ever (cnet.com)
An anonymous reader quotes CNET:
Anthem, the largest health insurance company in the U.S., has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit over a 2015 data breach for a record $115 million, according to lawyers for the plaintiffs. The settlement still has to be approved by US District Court Judge Lucy Koh, who is scheduled to hear the case on August 17 in San Jose, California. And Anthem, which didn't immediately respond to a request for confirmation and comment, isn't admitting any admitting any wrongdoing, according to a statement it made to CyberScoop acknowledging the settlement.
But if approved, it would be the largest data breach settlement in history, according to the plaintiffs' lawyers, who announced the agreement Friday. The funds would be used to provide victims of the data breach at least two years of credit monitoring and to reimburse customers for breach-related expenses. The settlement would also guarantee a certain level of funding for "information security to implement or maintain numerous specific changes to its data security systems, including encryption of certain information and archiving sensitive data with strict access controls," the plaintiff attorneys said.
The breach compromised data for 80 million people, including their social security numbers, birthdays, street addresses (and email addresses) as well as income data. The $115 million settlement averages out to $1.43 for every person who was affected.
But if approved, it would be the largest data breach settlement in history, according to the plaintiffs' lawyers, who announced the agreement Friday. The funds would be used to provide victims of the data breach at least two years of credit monitoring and to reimburse customers for breach-related expenses. The settlement would also guarantee a certain level of funding for "information security to implement or maintain numerous specific changes to its data security systems, including encryption of certain information and archiving sensitive data with strict access controls," the plaintiff attorneys said.
The breach compromised data for 80 million people, including their social security numbers, birthdays, street addresses (and email addresses) as well as income data. The $115 million settlement averages out to $1.43 for every person who was affected.
I'd say it's far closer to 30 cents after the lawyers etc get their share, if this is a class action suit.
They courts still haven't figured out a legitimate way to compensate or help affected individuals if they're still just trying to fund credit monitoring. :-/
Companies with breaches like this should face real, tangible consequences.
Yay! Big money!
Every person NEGATIVELY affected will have more than $1.43 in damages - far mor
The fine was still cheaper than maintain a proper IT and security organization.
For this minuscule amount per customer exposed, they will likely happily do it all again...
Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
So a pirated music file is worth tens of thousands of dollars, but a persons confidential medical history is worth $1.43
wow.....just effing wow.
And here is the funny part, the $110 million is probably considered a tax deductible expense, so the victims are in effect paying themselves a portion of the compensation.
Seems this is true.
Being in power is not so you can punish the poor, its to ensure the rich don't get punished.
Class action lawyers get about 15% of the total settlement amount. So the actual breakdown is $17.25 million to the lawyers, $1.22 for each person affected.
cease fire stand down,, keep the change,, sing along,, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GPyPT7fb0-Q ..turn off a few 1000 heavy duty WMDs on wheels just for a week or 2 just to see what happens, just in jersey even..
Reading the settlement agreement provides the following disbursement
As further described in this Agreement, the Settlement Fund shall be used by the Settlement Administrator to pay for:
(a) all reasonable Administrative Expenses;
(b) the Taxes described in Sections 3;
(c) Service Payments award by the Court, as described in Section 11;
(d) attorneys’ fees and costs approved by the Court, as described in Section 12;
(e) Credit Services as described in Section 4;
(f) Alternative Compensation as described in Section 5;
(g)Out-of-Pocket Costs as described in Section 6.
So the fund also covers taxes and administrative expenses, such as putting up a website where class members can go to register to get their money.
/. editors aren't admitting any admitting any proofreading.
The fine is 0.23% of their market value, and has someone else pointed out it is tax deductible. Additionally it is not a single payment, so it will be spread out over two or more years.
This will have zero impact on the economics of the company, which means it will have zero deterrent effect on Anthem or any other busness in their sector. Or for any other business in the US, for that matter.
It is, in short, a joke.
Why is Snark Required?
Will you use the money for a mullet?
Market capitalization is only vaguely related to a company's actual value, and even less to their day-to-day cash flow, revenue and profits.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
This is not going to hurt, so nothing will change.
this means nothing, it just cost them $1.43 more per customer on a base of 80 million customers.
Are you being a Slashdot Pundit and pointing out something of limited relevance or are you defending them? Do you think the fine is adequate and our system for regulating incompetent corporations is working correctly? Are you trying to make another point entirely?
You have added no value to the conversation, except to get your name posted. Even posting something overtly wrong would be better then venting something so vapid.
Get your game together, this is Slashdot. We say outrageous things and engage in verbal knife fights. For example, if Slashdot was a ride at the county fair your would not be allowed on because you are too short to hang with adults; go over to the petting zoo with the baby farm animals, it's more your speed. That, or something more cutting is where you should be, not this pseudo-intellectual crap.
Why is Snark Required?
So what? What's your point?
The point is that if you're going to try to decide if this will hurt the company or not, you should look at either income before tax, current assets, or cash flow. Those numbers are easy to find and will give you a much more accurate picture of how much it will hurt the company. I'll even link to them for you, to make your life easier, here you go, enjoy.
"First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."