Slashdot Mirror
Group Files FCC Motion To Delay Net Neutrality Proceedings (thehill.com)
"A public interest group wants the Federal Communications Commission to hold off on its proposal to kill net neutrality regulations," according to The Hill. An anonymous reader quotes their report:
The National Hispanic Media Coalition (NHMC) filed a motion on Friday to delay the FCC's proceeding to undo its net neutrality rules, pending the release of documents the group has requested from the agency. The NHMC says it filed a request under the Freedom of Information Act for consumer complaints about the open internet since the net neutrality rules went into place in 2015. Carmen Scurato, the group's director of legal affairs, said that the requested documents will affect the public's view of the rules... "Millions of consumers have voiced their concerns about eliminating net neutrality protections and the agency should release all complaints that members of the public have submitted showing how the Open Internet Order has served as a tool in protecting our consumer rights."
"The FCC has confirmed that there is an overwhelming amount of responsive documents, therefore the disclosure of this information must be paired with sufficient time for members of the public to review and contribute meaningful input..." the group said in a statement. "To date, the FCC has only released a small fraction of the documents requested. This is a clear indication that the FCC must delay its Net Neutrality proceeding until all documents requested by NHMC are released. The FCC must then provide NHMC and members of the public adequate time to review and comment on this information before moving forward with its Net Neutrality proceeding."
An FCC spokesman was not immediately available for comment.
"The FCC has confirmed that there is an overwhelming amount of responsive documents, therefore the disclosure of this information must be paired with sufficient time for members of the public to review and contribute meaningful input..." the group said in a statement. "To date, the FCC has only released a small fraction of the documents requested. This is a clear indication that the FCC must delay its Net Neutrality proceeding until all documents requested by NHMC are released. The FCC must then provide NHMC and members of the public adequate time to review and comment on this information before moving forward with its Net Neutrality proceeding."
An FCC spokesman was not immediately available for comment.
is the # of dollars the politicians received from Verizon/Comcast lobbyists greater that the number of comments against Net Neutrality ?
That is all that seems to matter these days.
Clearly, they're trying to get this through for the ISPs and doing as little as possible to meet the letter of the law in attempt to keep it under the radar.
Net neutrality using the FCC was always a bad idea from a regulatory standpoint. The FCC has no business regulating the internet or ISPs. Net neutrality needs to be passed as a law (or won via lawsuit). There is clearly public demand for a net neutrality law, so call your congress person and demand it.
Alternatively, it would be trivial to make the case that traffic shaping is a bait and switch practice (ISP offers X speed, but throttles it when you want to view your legally paid content like Netflix because it competes with their products and/or costs them bandwidth).
If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
The only way to fix this now is for America to some how, vote in a Liberal Government. There would need to be a complete removal of the right wing (I don't just mean the US Republicans) from power.
Right now, the reality is the Remnants of the old Confederacy rules America. Their votes have ALWAYS been privileged over the votes of the more liberal Union states, and now, its spread. Either there is a Political revolution in the country, or you can do what I and my wife did: Move to Canada.
Oh man you're killing me. Like the big corps won't be throwing money at the liberals in power. The only person who doesn't take money is Bernie and we saw how the liberals treated him.
They're not a group of rich old white men, so they'll be ignored as per policy in the current administration.
The distinction between wealth and political power is strictly semantic. Always has been.
This, of course, upsets people who don't have much wealth. They cling to nonsensical idealistic notions of power as something distinct from wealth (and, therefore, something that they have).
To be clear: inasmuch as a person is a measurable unit of human capital, that person has a modicum of wealth. The microscopic level of power that represents is generally expressed through voting, and purchasing decisions. The voting process (at least in America) has been designed to rob voters of even this trivial amount of power, so now it is basically just an exercise in "feeling" powerful, without actually determining anything of significance. The only real power most of us execute, then, is our purchasing decisions.
Funding a lobby is a purchase decision: one purchases political leverage. It is, in fact, the most effective purchasing decision most of us can make.