Slashdot Mirror


Vintage SciFi Magazine 'Galaxy' Preserved Online - And Hopefully Also SoundCloud (archive.org)

Long-time Slashdot reader Paul Fernhout writes: Archive.org has made available 355 issues of Galaxy Magazine for free access. Galaxy Science Fiction was an American digest-size science fiction magazine, published from 1950 to 1980 with stories from many sci-fi greats [including Harlan Ellison, Ray Bradbury, and Robert Heinlein]. At its peak, Galaxy greatly influenced the science fiction field. See also Open Culture and The Verge for more about the history of a magazine that help shape the imaginations of a generation of techies..
Meanwhile, Archive.org's Jason Scott -- who also founded textfiles.com -- says his own group of preservationists "plans large scale backing up of Soundcloud soon" -- or at least part of it. A placeholder page already informs visitors that "We are currently working on getting all the API data... We also are writing the scripts to get a good grab of everything we can." Scott told Motherboard Saturday "Our main concern is artists and creators suddenly finding their stuff gone, and making it so it's not in oblivion."

52 comments

  1. Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do suppose they got permission from all the copyright holders, including the notoriously litigious ones?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may have the right to redistribute the magazine but not republish articles into another book or magazine. Likewise, anyone trying to do that probably would run into issues.

    2. Re:Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The scans have actually been around quite a while. The archive also has scans of the sister magazine, If.

      At least one copyright holder objected. The page for volume 37, number 03 (March 1976) notes that "at the request of Alan Brennert, the short story 'The Second Soul' has been removed from this online copy."

      https://archive.org/details/Galaxy_v37n03_1976-03_modified

    3. Re:Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good ol' whorelan ellison. Have gone out of my way not to read any more of his stuff since he started that shit.

    4. Re:Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by caseih · · Score: 2

      The magazine's first couple of pages state that the copyright is owned by Galaxy Publishing Corporation. There's no mention of individual author's copyright. It's quite likely that if the authors did not sell their entire copyright to the magazine, they likely signed to allow galaxy the right to publish their work how they see fit, which is pretty standard for publishing articles in magazines. So there's no need to get permission from the individual authors.

      Presumably either the magazine's own copyright has expired, or the current owners granted archive.org permission. I don't see a problem with this archive. Archive.org is well aware of copyright law and its implications.

    5. Re:Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by ubrgeek · · Score: 2

      >redistribute the magazine ... run into issues

      I see what you did there ;)

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    6. Re:Cue Harlan Ellison lawsuit in 3..2.. by infolation · · Score: 1

      Does it make any difference since soundcloud only has enough money to last another 80 days or 50 days depending who you listen to?

  2. Looking @ 1973 Vol 34 issue right now... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    See subject: I had 100's of these (actually my Father did, he's read more varied material than anyone I've ever met) & this is all that remains of them. We'd pick them up for 25 cents each @ a used bookstore nearby. I know this for a fact, as the sticker is STILL on the issue (yellowed w/ age).

    Periodicals like this one, alongside comic books (which were 1st for me when I was ~ 6 yrs. old or so) helped me build up a decent enough vocabulary to score 790 on my SAT verbal.

    My dad was a smart guy who knew reading was a good thing to get into for kids & early.

    (Due to collegiate academia mostly though, I 'graduated' into mostly TECHNICAL reading though from then on & never went back to "leisure reading" for enjoyment though - it is only "made up stuff" granted, but it builds a foundation to build upon imo).

    The trick I suppose was getting me material I would keep on doing. They worked.

    APK

    P.S.=> I never REALLY 'regretted' the hours spent on reading these & others like them (though I do wish I'd had more 'drive' to dive into more "useful material" that's practical for living though back then - but imo, it can be as DRY AS TOAST & not as "fun" as sci-fi was - I'd probably never have stuck by it were it the other way around especially considering I was only a young boy)... apk

    1. Re:Looking @ 1973 Vol 34 issue right now... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beg to differ. It is obvious you care and make a fool of yourself so take your own advice troll or get on topic.

    2. Re:Looking @ 1973 Vol 34 issue right now... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to tell us about your hosts file.

  3. Re:The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I'm glad you've given your life over to Jesus!

  4. I can understand scifi magazine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok I can understand scifi magazine, its written professionally and it's printed material thats worth keeping and re-reading well into the future but why soundcloud? soundcloud is full of amateur rubbish stuff. It's like archiving peoples facebook profiles.

  5. Why are you lying about me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See subject: I don't drool. I am not siphilitic. I am not a child molester. Stop now. I realize I must've really publicly destroyed you but I don't do that unless I am attacked 1st (like you are doing now). So You brought that on yourself.

    * Yes, it's the reason you won't post using your "registered 'luser'" account & instead nigh-constantly harass me by UNIDENTIFIABLE "ne'er-do-well" anonymous posts...

    (As you realize I've bookmarked every single time you've attacked me & I've torn you apart, probably under MANY fake account sockpuppets as well - get over it & grow up).

    APK

    P.S.=> Want to be angry @ someone? Look @ a mirror chump... lol! apk

    1. Re:Why are you lying about me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I am not siphilitic. ...

      Serious query: Have you ever been tested for Lyme?

      From what I understand it's very similar to, and hard to distinguish from, syphilis. Did debilitating and irreversible mental faculty damage to a childhood friend of mine before it was diagnosed and treated properly.

  6. Would be better yet by fnj · · Score: 2

    I wish there was an archive of Analog Science Fiction and Science Fact, formerly Astounding. That one always seemed liked the thinking man's reader to me. The golden age for me was the 1950s through 1960s into the 1970s.

    Murray Leinster, Christopher Anvil, Poul Anderson, Isaac Asimov, Keith Laumer ... those were the days.

    1. Re:Would be better yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best era of Asimov's, by contrast, was the Gardner Dozois era in the 80's and 90's. But then the SJW's took over the science fiction profession and replaced him with a woman. Now that magazine just features touchy-feely fantasy stories where every story is written by a woman and any semblance of actual science fiction is long gone.

    2. Re:Would be better yet by fnj · · Score: 1

      The best era of Asimov's, by contrast, was the Gardner Dozois era in the 80's and 90's. But then the SJW's took over the science fiction profession and replaced him with a woman. Now that magazine just features touchy-feely fantasy stories where every story is written by a woman and any semblance of actual science fiction is long gone.

      That trend took sway in earnest at Analog in the 70s after starting to bubble up as early as the 60s. Also, I have piles and piles of Science Fiction Book Club titles by female authors which I never cracked open.

    3. Re:Would be better yet by mcswell · · Score: 1

      Your wish is my command. Ok, it was someone's command. Here: http://www.freesfonline.de/Mag.... Far from every issue, I'm afraid, but I'm still working my way through after discovering this some years ago.

  7. Olds by pjt33 · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure that this is news - I downloaded the first year or so of Galaxy from archive.org last November. The irritating thing is that the URLs don't follow a consistent pattern, so I couldn't just curl them to catch up with at my leisure.

    1. Re:Olds by fnj · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Archive.org became hipsterized in terms of site design some time ago. It used to be very elegantly laid out and you used to be able to actually find things. Bunch of tasteless infants.

  8. Re:The truth about the evolution hoax. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    The god made creimer and nixed all his previous efforts.

    You can read all about that in "Job: A Comedy of Justice" by Robert A. Heinlein.

  9. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Affiliate spam as usual.

  10. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    Affiliate spam as usual.

    That's the price for using my name and likeness on Slashdot.

  11. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    Affiliate spam as usual.

    That's the price for using my name and likeness on Slashdot.

    spam-free pdf You're free to put affiliate links if you want, but it IS spam, and as such, has a negative impact on your reputation.

    I've up-modded a few of your posts because I look at each post on it's merit, no on the person's overall reputation, but I won't even consider the spammy ones for an up-mod. (blog spam doesn't deserve up-mods. No, I don't down-mod them - I'd rather concentrate on up-mods, as per the guidelines).

    I look at it this way - people aren't attacking me for spamming, but for what I am, or for a serious differences of opinion - and I'm okay with that.

    For those who want to post spammy links, there's Facebook and Twitter. Nothing of value will be lost on either site.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  12. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0

    spam-free pdf

    But depriving the RAH estate of roylaty income for a book that isn't in the public domain is perfectly okay?

    [...] as such, has a negative impact on your reputation.

    Not really. AFAIK, karma is accumulative. After 10K+ comments, I got years of karma to burn through. Also, I get up voted more than I get down voted by the mods.

    For those who want to post spammy links, there's Facebook and Twitter. Nothing of value will be lost on either site.

    Except Slashdot doesn't work that way. If no one complains about a link, it gets a minimal amount of clicks. If someone complains about the link, it gets 3X as many clicks. The "10 kinds of people" link in my signature easily gets 20+ clicks per day (and I really need to set up my email list). I don't get that level of response from Twitter and I don't do FaceBook. Slashdot is a fishbowl with a lot of hungry little fishes.

  13. great by pD-brane · · Score: 0

    This is great! Free the information!

  14. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1
    The RAH isn't doing anything about it. Maybe because they don't know ... so posting a link might just bring it to their attention. And if they aren't pursuing it because it's not that important to them, well, if they don't care, neither should you.

    The karma cap is 50 points. Once you hit it, positive mods do nothing, but negative mods will still affect it. For example, if you're at the cap, get 10 + mods, then subsequently get 10 - mods, you're down to 40 points. If a few people with 15 mod points decide to mod-bomb you, you can quickly find yourself at zero.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  15. Re:The truth about the evolution hoax. by digitig · · Score: 1

    On a thread about classic science fiction? I suppose it makes sense.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  16. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy shit, 20 clicks a day! That has monetize out to a nickel after a few months! Totally worth your time here. Just think of "dealing with 14 year old who insult you" as a job that pays substantially below minimum wage.

    With that sort of business acumen, it's amazing you are on the old side of middle-aged, living in a studio apartment with a manga collection.

  17. Re:The truth about the evolution hoax. by davester666 · · Score: 1

    Normally, your post would seem completely odd, but it completely fits in with a sci-fi article.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  18. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "But depriving the RAH estate of roylaty income for a book that isn't in the public domain is perfectly okay?"

    Sure, fuck the "estate". They didn't write it, they didn't produce anything. Why should they get to leech from productive people?

  19. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Part of Heinlen's motivation to write in the first place was the financial reward. That's how the copyright system works and why it works well.

    The Beatles didn't go around selling "Sgt. Peppers'" from the back of a van. They sold the rights to EMI for money, and in return EMI gets the copyright. If this system wasn't in place, Sgt. Peppers' never would have or could have been created.

  20. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Part of Heinlen's motivation to write in the first place was the financial reward. That's how the copyright system works and why it works well."

    Newsflash. He's dead.

    " If this system wasn't in place, Sgt. Peppers' never would have or could have been created."

    You can't know that. Stop smelling your own farts and telling me it smells like flowers.

  21. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    With that sort of business acumen, it's amazing you are on the old side of middle-aged, living in a studio apartment with a manga collection.

    Middle age is between 45 and 64. I'm only 47. That puts me on the young side of middle age. Now get off my virtual lawn, Millennial!

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/middle%20age

  22. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    The karma cap is 50 points. Once you hit it, positive mods do nothing, but negative mods will still affect it. For example, if you're at the cap, get 10 + mods, then subsequently get 10 - mods, you're down to 40 points.

    I just re-read the Slashdot FAQs. I didn't find this information anywhere and it's not consistent with my own experience.

    If a few people with 15 mod points decide to mod-bomb you, you can quickly find yourself at zero.

    Fortunately, I'm not pissing off everyone with a user account. Only the 14-year-old wankers.

  23. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would still like a reply to the central part: it seems obvious that the "work" you do of spamming Slashdot is earning you substantially less than minimum wage, and yet you keep bragging about it.

    Care to respond? Inquiring minds want to know.

  24. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Care to respond?

    Nope. :)

  25. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can read all about that in "Job: A Comedy of Justice" by Robert A. Heinlein.
    https://tinyurl.com/y92tkxr8
    --
    There are 10 kinds of people on Slashdot. Which kind are you?
    https://www.cdreimer.com/slash...

  26. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your brain must be ripped from all the gymnastics you put it through.

  27. Don't APPLY here (only time I post on hosts) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: I only post on hosts when they apply to help - they do NOT here. Get it UNIDENTIFIABLE anonymous troll?

    APK

    P.S.=> Unbelievable - I want "your kind" to THINK about this (it is YOUR life after all):

    If SOME of you "ne'er-do-well" do nothings spent time creating something like I did that speeds you up & protects vs. tracking/malware etc. (bad things online in general to a HUGE extent) WHICH I HAVE DONE EXTREMELY WELL WITH for something that was "just for a lark" FUN for me (vs. trolling me as you do thinking you're 'clever' (trust me - you're not))?

    THEN you won't have wasted your time + the time of others along w/ space on this page & YOUR own lives trolling me!

    Try being of service to others & the world in general as an overall "net good" instead of being pests + wastes of life - it works out well, I know... apk

  28. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by ls671 · · Score: 1

    Come on, stop this non-sense and propose Barbara to marry you. She has opened the door to you many times and she seems like a decent person.

    What are you waiting for?

    --
    Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
  29. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Creimer, the 350 pound virgin, is quite bashful.

  30. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at your UID and look at his UID. He massively outranks you, so shut the fuck up.

  31. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, he outweighs pretty much anyone here. Or anywhere.

  32. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    I resent that remark. I am NOT a "decent person." I have my faults, same as everyone else. The only difference might be that I'm very much aware of them. Same as I'm aware that as time goes on, I'm continually having to challenge my basic assumptions because I can't just ignore new evidence. People who don't do this seem much happier.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  33. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by BarbaraHudson · · Score: 1

    My original UID was in the 43000 range, under my old name. But when I legally changed my name and sex, I couldn't just change the user name, so I had to get another account to prevent incongruity.

    --
    "Transparent" is a shit show that trades on every stereotype going. A man in drag is NOT a transsexual.
  34. Re: The truth about the evolution hoax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Translation: "You're right, I make pennies an hour doing all this useless shit, and as a result am a bitter, angry, frustrated old man. I will die alone and unhappy from the massive coronary brought on by eating all my feelings."

  35. Question is, have YOU?... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Stop projecting your issues on me. Your attempt @ playing "SiDeWaLk ShRiNk" of /. failed UNIDENTIFIABLE ac troll!

    APK

    P.S.=> Unbelievable the depths "your kind" sinks to - especially DELUSIONS of Grandeur you have of being a doctor... apk