Slashdot Mirror


Tesla Model 3 Test Drive: Car Has Bite and Simple Interior (wsj.com)

An anonymous reader shares a WSJ article: A first peek inside Tesla's new Model 3 compact car revealed a starker, cozier interior than the more spacious and luxurious Model S. But as the sedan sped off, the experience felt similar. On Friday, the Silicon Valley auto maker showed off details of the all-electric sedan's interior for the first time (Editor's note: the link could be paywalled; alternative source), allowing brief test rides with a roughly 10-minute spin around the factory. The Model 3 represents a milestone for Chief Executive Elon Musk, who has long wanted to create an electric car for the masses. He's betting the new vehicle can help fuel massive growth for his 14-year-old company, projecting Tesla will produce a half-million cars next year, after delivering about 76,000 Model S sedans and Model X sport-utility vehicles last year. The Model 3's exterior was revealed in March last year, but details about the interior have been scarce. The $35,000 sedan is noticeably bare bones inside -- gone are the displays and instrument panel behind the steering wheel and the numerous switches and buttons found in the cockpit of traditional cars. Instead, the Model 3 makes greater use of a video screen in the center dash that controls most of the car's functions.

192 comments

  1. Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0

    Dashboard is ugly and doesn't look very driver friendly, but taste is subjective so fair enough...

    My problem is that it is expensive and not as green as Tesla claims, but they will sell...

    For what I see there, $17,000 strikes me as the right price, Tesla has made progress, but not there yet.

    1. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 0

      Note: If you doubt the $17K price, you haven't driven a Ford Fusion lately. What they sell for $17K is impressive.

      There are several other under $20K cars nicely equipped that are as nice as this.

    2. Re:Ugly Dashboard by DivineKnight · · Score: 0

      Hmm. That screen. Just looking at it makes me want to take out insurance on it, separate from the car...

      As for the seats, those headrests look a little uncomfortable, unless you have a small head, or the ability to keep your head and neck at attention for long hours...

    3. Re:Ugly Dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, the dashboard is ugly. Get rid of the distractive screen and all the buttons and switches, make it HUD only, with touch sensitive regions... for a sensual ride on a beautiful {your_sexual_preference_here}. :-P I should work in marketing.

    4. Re: Ugly Dashboard by jo7hs2 · · Score: 1

      Um... Did you mean Ford Focus? The Fusion's starting MSRP has been over $20k for a while now (this model year it is $22,120, Focus is $16,775).

    5. Re:Ugly Dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      That means you know fuck all about EVs. There are no EVs with this range for $17K.

    6. Re: Ugly Dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with the ugly part. It looks like the display was just an inconvenient afterthought that can be easily removed once full autonomous operation is approved. I thought the interior was a joke. It was made for a passenger, not a pilot.

    7. Re:Ugly Dashboard by ranton · · Score: 1

      Note: If you doubt the $17K price, you haven't driven a Ford Fusion lately. What they sell for $17K is impressive.

      Based on the price you gave I assume you mean the Ford Focus, and Tesla is clearly targeting a more fun to drive car than a Focus. The Focus RS compares favorably to the Tesla, but it is a $37k car ($55k if you add the extra cost in fuel vs electricity between it and the Tesla).

      It is very possible Tesla will eventually create a 9s 0-60 car which is closer to $20k, but that if probably a decade from now.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    8. Re:Ugly Dashboard by ranton · · Score: 1

      If you buy a Tesla 3, you are kinda making a bet that Tesla will be providing Level 4 autonomous capabilities very soon. Musk is claiming you will be sleeping in the driver seat by the end of 2019. I don't have much confidence in that figure but it doesn't sound outlandish. By that time the dashboard screen is just for watching the morning news on the way to work.

      If you don't believe Level 4 autonomy is coming any time soon, then the design decisions behind the Tesla 3 are certainly less than ideal.

      --
      -- All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -- Edmund Burke
    9. Re:Ugly Dashboard by Rei · · Score: 2

      Ah yes, I remember when they started shipping the $17k Ford Fusion standard with 7 cameras, radar and 12 ultrasound sensors to implement automatic crash avoidance, with an optional upgrade to self driving. I remember it like yesterday: I had just told the car to preheat using an app on my phone, put my bags into the frunk, and after staring through the panoramic glass roof, I peeled out with a 5,6 second 0-60 with instantaneous torque using energy that I could refill cleanly at miniscule cost using a battery pack warrantied for 8 years, while the info ticked by on its 15" touchscreen....

      Ford Fusions sure have changed.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    10. Re: Ugly Dashboard by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      And yet, it is a superior vehicle to bmw 3/4 series, along with Audi A4s, most of MB c class, most of lexus, all of which compete against M3.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    11. Re:Ugly Dashboard by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It's plain bullshit. I'll give you one example. I live close to a major city an it has a one-way street, recently changed, which Google Maps claims is a two-way street for at least two months. Autonomize that.

    12. Re: Ugly Dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice summary of features. I was sold on the 5.6 zero to sixty already but didn't know about most of the other items in detail. I really wish I could test drive one in my town... kinda want one of these badly!

    13. Re:Ugly Dashboard by tempo36 · · Score: 1

      Almost like you'd want the car to be able to read signs...wonder if anyone is working on putting cameras in cars that can recognize signs. Maybe someone will get on that.

    14. Re: Ugly Dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds dull. I suggest you go by horse instead.

    15. Re:Ugly Dashboard by skullandbones99 · · Score: 1

      Model 3 has Level 5 autonomous hardware, it just needs the software to be completed and for governments to ratify that autonomous vehicles are allowed to operate in their countries. My guess is that this will take 2 to 5 years from now to legally use Level 5. So Tesla just needs to download the certified autonomous software over the air in a few years time.

    16. Re: Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Fusions don't sell for anything close to MSRP, Tessa has to due to a lack of dealer network.

    17. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Ahh yes, the features that turn it into a $55K car...

    18. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      No, that is indeed true... and the problem, gas cars are cheaper to buy and cheaper to run for the first 3-5 years which is all new car buyers care about.

    19. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      No, the Fusion... an overlooked gem of a car. You can usually find mid level trim Fusions for $17k, or $250 a month on lease with nothing due at signing.

      After buying gas, the Fusion is still cheaper to own.

    20. Re: Ugly Dashboard by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Unlimited technology from the whole universe, and you cruise 'round in a Ford P.O.S.

    21. Re:Ugly Dashboard by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Well duh, they're cheap because they don't last for shit. If you want a decent car of that class, get a Toyota Camry; it's usually priced lower and you don't have to throw it away after 5 years.

      BTW you sound just like car dealer. Honestly, fuck buying new cars, otherwise you're just throwing away lots of money, just like one does when they buy a Ford (except maybe Ford trucks.)

    22. Re:Ugly Dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But they are getting cheaper. The trend is for price parity in 2020. From then on EVs are cheaper.

      Meanwhile, EVs are close enough in price that people that prefer them will pay extra to get one.

      But really saying that the Model 3 ought to be $17K when at $35K they have a 2 year waiting list of people that all paid a deposit. It's moronic.

    23. Re: Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Says the person who hasn't driven one recently... Your loss, but they really are nice cars now...

    24. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Ahh, someone who has a badly outdated view of such things...

      Toyota isn't what it once was, Ford isn't either... give Consumer Reports try, they talk about this in recent auto reviews, that the gap has closed and the old issues are largely gone...

      Either way, the Model 3 is stupid over priced for $35K in terms of the actual car, putting aside the power plant. Its cost to own over 3-5 years is much higher than a similar gas car.

    25. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      It isn't moronic... it is logic, but which do you know about that?

      Remind me how many TOTAL cars Tesla has EVER sold? Ford sells that in a month...

      A 2 year waiting list isn't hard when you are such a small company and can't make very many cars...

      As for the price dropping, anything is possible, but that is highly unlikely, it would stomp all over the Model 3... but then I did say that the price was the primary problem, if they indeed get a Model 3 down to $17K (or even $20K) in 3 years, then fair enough, they could then sell millions of them...

      But $35K is just way too much for what this car is beyond the "Cult of Tesla" buyers, which is all they are right now given the volumes...

    26. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Then the sign is dirty, or covered by snow/ice/graffiti, or just knocked down... or placed wrong...

      Self-driving will happen soon, but not completely self-driving... you'll still have to pay attention and it will only work in 80-90% of places, the last 10-20% is where major changes to the roads, construction areas, etc. will have to happen.

      Those can all happen, and probably will, but not in the useful life of this car...

    27. Re:Ugly Dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Not that hard? Show me another manufacturer that makes thousands of cars per month and has a 2 year waiting list of people that have paid deposits.

      Of course Ford are bigger. But Ford isn't growing like Tesla. There was a time when IBM was bigger than Microsoft and Apple. Things change. And it's obvious to anyone that's paying attention than things are changing big time in the car industry.

      Again your price target of $17,000 for a car like the Model 3 is moronic. The Model 3 will continue to sell like hot cakes at the price it is. It's other EVs that will fill the space below the Model 3.

    28. Re: Ugly Dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Go on then. Show us a deal where you can get a new Ford Fusion for $17,000.

    29. Re:Ugly Dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Actually, all the features he mentioned are in the $35,000 base model.

      You're not very informed are you.

    30. Re:Ugly Dashboard by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Then the sign is dirty, or covered by snow/ice/graffiti, or just knocked down... or placed wrong...

      Then wouldn't you miss it as well? OTOH, if it IS missing, but IS in the database, then the human is the one who is more likely to be heading the wrong way.

    31. Re:Ugly Dashboard by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Toyota isn't what it once was, Ford isn't either... give Consumer Reports try, they talk about this in recent auto reviews, that the gap has closed and the old issues are largely gone...

      I'll just leave this here.

      https://www.consumerreports.or...

    32. Re: Ugly Dashboard by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have actually, my aunt happens to own a Ford Fusion. Hers is a 2015, and my Camry is 2013. I got my car the same year she got hers (I paid $10k cash for mine, salvaged.) Hers drives ok from my experience, but it's already having transmission problems. The only problem mine technically had was the result of its previous owner being involved in a wreck that damaged the front right wheel well, which was easily fixed, but that wasn't inherent in its build quality at all.

      Every mechanic I know (and there are many in my family) hates Ford because they break often and suffer from designs that are very anti-mechanic, even to this day. This is why I say you have to throw it out after 5 years. There's a reason you don't see as many people drive around in older Fords as you do other brands, except for Ford trucks. The only reason you think otherwise is because the dealer did this to you:

      http://livingstingy.blogspot.c...

    33. Re: Ugly Dashboard by st0nes · · Score: 1

      My car: 2006 Ford Fiesta, bought new. 208,000 kms on the clock, no breakdowns--ever. One anecdote to your nothing....

      --
      Tempora mutantur, nos et mutamur in illis
    34. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      The sign database is never going to be that accurate... humans and all...

      As for missing it, yes... but I can look at the road and figure things out in a way that the computer cannot.

      Again, self driving for 80-90% of driving is doable and quickly, probably in the next 5 years... that last 10% will take a complete rethink and overhaul of the road system...

    35. Re: Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You bought a written-off, salvaged 2015 Ford and use that to claim Ford sucks?

      I've been driving them for decades, cars and trucks, they are no more or less reliable than any other major car brand...

    36. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Neither are you, because they are not...

    37. Re:Ugly Dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yes, they are. And now you've looked it up and feel like the fool you are.

    38. Re: Ugly Dashboard by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      You bought a written-off, salvaged 2015 Ford and use that to claim Ford sucks?

      I've been driving them for decades, cars and trucks, they are no more or less reliable than any other major car brand...

      False. My 2013 Camry is salvaged, and it has no problems at all, vs the brand new 2015 Ford that is already having problems in its very short lifespan.

    39. Re: Ugly Dashboard by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      Here's an actual compiled report with data to back it up, vs your nothing:

      https://www.consumerreports.or...

    40. Re:Ugly Dashboard by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I think the only way this will work is with smart-signs that communicate where they're placed.

    41. Re:Ugly Dashboard by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      The sign database is never going to be that accurate... humans and all...

      The sign database will become more and more accurate... machines and all. The first car to encounter an unexpected sign reports it. Other cars in the area could be updated in real time. CarCrowdSourcing.

    42. Re:Ugly Dashboard by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Why? The car can read the sign as it is.

    43. Re:Ugly Dashboard by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      That works in science fiction, it falls apart in the world we live in now...

    44. Re:Ugly Dashboard by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Real time updating seems to work for Waze - what makes this science fictiony?

  2. b*****s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it can't be starker _and_ cozier

    1. Re: b*****s by crankyspice · · Score: 1

      You've never done time in the Q...

      --
      geek. lawyer.
  3. Re:Cancelling order by brad3378 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it ironic that the most popular car on Slashdot is also the most difficult to hot rod?

    It really is the Apple of automobiles.

    --

  4. No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many hours until the phone app is hacked?
    What about those of us who despise cell phones and don't own one?
    You simply must have a way to unlock and open a door if the battery is dead.

    1. Re: No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just put a USB port on the outside

    2. Re:No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You simply must have a way to unlock and open a door if the battery is dead.

      I assure you, I can help you get into your car, albeit via utilization of some fairly "old school" technology. -PCP

    3. Re:No key? by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "How many hours until the phone app is hacked?
      What about those of us who despise cell phones and don't own one?"

      Those buy a Ford 150.

    4. Re:No key? by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      It does have a key card that opens the door, so you don't technically need a phone. But yes, if the battery is dead, you won't be able to open the door from the outside. Last time I had a dead battery in any car was... 1994 but your mileage may vary.

    5. Re:No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also I guess you need to give the valet your phone.

    6. Re: No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your guess is of course wrong.

    7. Re: No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And your guess is of course right.

      Fixed that for you.

    8. Re: No key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, by "fixed" you mean "broke", you are correct. Otherwise read the damn Verge article to see why you are wrong.

  5. Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Dracos · · Score: 1

    The front fascia's lack of anything resembling a grille opening makes the whole thing look like a cheap plastic Chinese R/C car.

    That dashboard looks like it was stolen from a 80s-era concept car and Elon velcro'd a giant iPad to it, made more starkly out of place by the complete lack of gauge cluster.

    1. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by dunkelfalke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would you have a grille opening in a car that doesn't need an air intake? Besides, these wannabe-mouths are usually ugly. I miss the 80ies, back then they tried to hide these for aerodynamic reasons.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    2. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      Why would you have a grille opening in a car that doesn't need an air intake?

      That black area underneath where the grille opening would be looks like an air intake.

      Either way, the front looks ugly. For a minimalist design, it has unnecessary curves.

    3. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That black area underneath where the grille opening would be looks like an air intake.

      That and the tiny wheel wells make this a "summer car". Not mass-market for anywhere it snows. The Model 3 another Tesla toy.

    4. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      LOL US drivers still addicted to grilles. Why not buy a Rolls Royce then?

    5. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by PsyMan · · Score: 2

      No Grill, nowhere to hang the coal shovel or the buggy whip, completely useless.

    6. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine by me, theres alot of places it doesnt snow. Meanwhile, people in snowy places drive other small cars with small wheel wells.
      I will never understand nerds who dont support Tesla, they are leading a tech revolution, and all you can do is nit pick?

    7. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Before looking at TF Pictures I thought you were just trolling. I assumed it was just an issue of adjusting to elimination of a number of stupid automobile conventions and aesthetics would adjust.

      Now I don't.

    8. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smaller wheels are actually better in the snow then larger wheels, IAAC (Canadian), the gp post has no idea what he's talking aboot

    9. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Why would you have a grille opening in a car that doesn't need an air intake?

      Looks like a front spoiler to me. Personally I like the styling, and that's just it. It's a personal thing. Otherwise there wouldn't be different styling options on the market from different companies.

    10. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That and the tiny wheel wells make this a "summer car". Not mass-market for anywhere it snows. "

      It never even rains in Southern California, if one believes the song.
      So if you're a redneck from Minnesota, just don't buy one.

    11. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      In most of the world there will be a front license plate there. Otherwise, just stick on a grille sticker if you really want the car to look like an old-fashioned combustion engine car. I certainly don't.

    12. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      I can't find really good close up photos, but the black grid pattern suggests an air intake rather than a spoiler.

      https://www.indiacarnews.com/w...

    13. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 2

      I also think the front is a styling miss (but not the rest of the car). My misgivings go the other way though:
      I think the front still looks too much like that of a car with a grille opening. If you don't need a grille, why cling to the traditional form instead of making it even more sleek?
      The front area of the General Motors EV 1 does look better IMHO.
      If you still need a small air inlet, it could go left and right of the license plate. Imagine something like the GM Impact, with the two central air inlets "pulled apart" and located next to the fender area. The license plate could go in the middle.

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    14. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Gussington · · Score: 1

      I also think the front is a styling miss

      Yep it looks dated already. Reminds me of an mix between and old 90's Ford Laser and an early 2000's Mazda 3
      https://upload.wikimedia.org/w...
      http://carphotos.cardomain.com...

    15. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smaller wheels but with large tires are what's best in the snow.

    16. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      No doubt you would have complained about the first cats that didn't have chrome bumpers (fenders).

      Form follows function. EVs don't need grills. You can expect that no car in the future will have a grill. And that doesn't mean they'll be less attractive. It just means you are conservative in your taste. Your idea or what looks good is something that looks not very different from what you've seen before.

    17. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      You can't say any of the curves are unnecessary, since you haven't taken it through a wind tunnel. (Real or virtual). Tesla have, and lowering the air resistance is a high priority.

    18. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Solandri · · Score: 1

      What makes you think batteries don't need to be cooled? While EVs don't need as much cooling air as an ICE, they still need some air intake since the most obvious source (underneath) is blocked by a thick metal plate to protect it from being punctured by road debris. (Yes you can use it as a heat sink, but then you're only disseminating heat to a two dimensional layer of air contacting the plate, instead of a volume of air.) And you want a duct anyway so you can put a fan in it to force air through when the car is stopped or traveling too slowly but the batteries are overheating.

    19. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric vehicles in general aren't for anywhere it snows, at the moment. Unless you want to freeze or drive 20 miles per charge

    20. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric vehicles in general aren't for anywhere it snows, at the moment. Unless you want to freeze or drive 20 miles per charge

      Except Scandinavia where there are tens of thousands of EVs. Never gets cold or snows up there.

    21. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I miss the 80ies, back then they tried to hide these for aerodynamic reasons.

      Were you in an alternate universe then? The 80s cars in my universe were ugly boxes, with grills. It was the 90s when they tried to hide them.

      They've brought them back because the highly-sloped hoods were horrible for pedestrian safety: when you hit a person, they'd bounce up onto (or through) the windshield. Somehow, modern grills are safer (probably are made of somewhat easily-crushed plastic) and don't scoop up pedestrians this way. Seems weird to me, but that's what I've read about it. Also, even with modern grills, modern cars have lower Cd numbers than ever.

    22. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      As long as it's at least 0F, just go without heat. You can simply wear more clothes to keep you warm.

      In Minnesnowta-like conditions, however, I'd say it's a bad idea. At those temperatures you'll get frostbite sitting for long without heat.

      But the battery range problem is a big one: batteries typically have much poorer output in very cold weather. But these EVs are supposed to have battery heaters to help with that (of course, that takes more power...).

    23. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, they aren't. Skinny wheels are what's best in the snow, regardless of diameter. Skinny wheels means a smaller contact patch and more pressure. Wide tires float on the snow.

    24. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they aren't.

      Yes they are. You don't know what you're talking about. Smaller diameter wheels with larger tire side walls are better in the snow.

    25. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      U know, since you are so certain that Tesla M3 is a disaster, u should not only SHORT Tesla stock, but also consider buying something like a new MB S class. You will really teach musk a lesson that you are smarter than he is.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    26. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EVs don't need grills.

      100% wrong. EVs still have radiators and condensers that require airflow. The gill is the most efficient way to provide that airflow.

    27. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You know what you get when you combine skinny wheels with soft snow and low ground clearance? Stuck. That's what you get.

    28. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by skullandbones99 · · Score: 1

      The battery pack is liquid cooled and heated, and uses a heat exchanger so I think there is a radiator and fan somewhere in the vehicle.

      In cold weather the battery pack can be pre-heated before you drive so that the battery's performance can be maximised.

      When driving and charging, the battery needs to be actively cooled to maximise performance.

    29. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Rei · · Score: 1

      Indeed. A quarter of Norway's new vehicle sales are EVs.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    30. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lol, it's you! I was wondering what sort of idiot must be out there (but which I had never encountered before) who automakers were catering to when putting fake grilles on cars that didn't need them.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    31. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Rei · · Score: 1

      Speed has more of an influence than temperature. Low temperature may cut your range ~20% on a Model 3, but you can increase or decrease it by 3x by changing how fast you drive.

      Also, worth mentioning: you can preheat an EV (with the app) on mains power.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    32. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Rei · · Score: 2

      The radiators on Tesla vehicles are located on the front, using air ducted underneath the vehicle. They're most active when the vehicle is stationary: when supercharging. Tesla uses a somewhat complex but very efficient system for balancing the varying heating and cooling needs between different parts of the vehicle. Heat can be shunted into or out of the battery pack, motor/inverter heat is captured, heat can be shunted into or out of the cabin, etc.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    33. Re: Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's regardless of the width of the wheels. Skinny wheels have better traction in snow than wide ones.

    34. Re:Model 3 is a complete styling miss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The..eighties? Are you..are you fucking serious?

  6. Re:Cancelling order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most popular car on slashdot is the most nerdiest car created by a nerd ever what is ironic about that? You must be young to not remember that overall working on cars wasn't a nerdy thing. Jocks worked on their cars nerds played D&D.

  7. Re:Cancelling order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The number of people who are shorting Tesla shares is astounding. You find them everywhere.

  8. What The Actual Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This interior is a joke, right? Right??? Am I looking at a fucking iPad glued to an almost empty dashboard? WHAT? NO INSTRUMENT CLUSTER? IS THIS A FEVER DREAM?

    Do they not have a human factors engineering dept? Or did they hire all millennial Google rejects to fill their staff?

    This thing looks like a fucking engineering disaster in the making. People are going to die from distracted driving staring at this tablet in the center of the dash. Do people not realize that the Fords & GMs of the world spend $$ into human factors research trying to figure out where exactly the little buttons on the steering wheel and instrument panel go, what they feel like, etc? There is a reason for this.

    1. Re:What The Actual Fuck by arth1 · · Score: 1

      This thing looks like a fucking engineering disaster in the making. People are going to die from distracted driving staring at this tablet in the center of the dash.

      I agree. Having to look to the side to see your speed or a warning seems like an unnecessary heightened risk.

      "Keep your eyes on the road and your hands upon the wheel."
      -- The Doors

    2. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Toyota have had speedometers in the center for years now. It's no different than them.

    3. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Toyota have had speedometers in the center for years now.

      And it's completely sucked for all those years. At least the GT86 has the speedometer where it should be.

    4. Re:What The Actual Fuck by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      In a modern car you're less concerned with speedometer speed. It used to be that you had to constantly adjust your driving to stay under the limit. Now there's either adaptive cruise control, where you set the speed limit for the road, and then you don't care again.Or there's autonomous capability that knows the speed limit via the navigation system and/or computer recognition of a speed limit sign you passed.

      OK, none of this stuff is perfect yet, and there are times when you need to consult the speedo. But it is still there. Just off to your side rather than directly in front.

    5. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hyperbole much...? The only time I really look at the speedometer is when I see the highway patrol speed trap. I'm not much of a speeder nowadays, that's just a knee jerk reaction.

      Other things I don't look at: tach, oil temperature, voltage, radiator temp for goodness sakes, it's 2017, those things are taken care of in every modern vehicle. Tesla is just taking the next obvious step. If anything, I would have made the screen much, much smaller, like 9" / iPad mini size.

    6. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This thing looks like a fucking engineering disaster in the making.

      Small correction: this could be an engineering masterpiece for all we know, it's a human factors and design disaster in the making.

      Engineers aren't the ones who come up with the idea of eliminating tactile controls and having everything on a stupid touchscreen. They just implement what the designers tell them to.

    7. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Oh BS. My car has radar adaptive cruise control. It's really nice on flat freeways and some other places, but you aren't always driving on those. When you're not using it, you still need to see the speed to avoid a speeding ticket.

      I also don't use my ACC when I'm on rolling hills like we have here in VA: it wastes gas because it'll mash the gas going uphill and slow down when going downhill; it's better for me to speed up on the downhill slopes a bit so I let it coast a bit going uphill. The interstates aren't like this, but smaller state highways are full of these rolling hills because they were too cheap to level them.

      IMO, every car should be required to have a HUD (heads-up display) showing the speed and other info. Looking to the side is retarded.

    8. Re: What The Actual Fuck by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Actually, while it may feel weird at first, it's actually safer. Putting the cluster in the middle puts it further away from you, which means you don't need to refocus your eyes as much. Thus, it's faster to look down, and faster to return your eyes to the road. We're talking about fractions of a second here, but it is measurable in the lab.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    9. Re:What The Actual Fuck by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Gas? How quaint. With EVs those slowdowns on the downslopes regenerate, so there's not much in it. And provided you have the range, the electricity itself is cheap.

      The places where you can't let the car either drive itself or at least control the speed are shrinking.

      Personally, I have my ACC on the vast majority of the time. Just flicking the speed limit up or down when the limit changes.

    10. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Rei · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, all of the driving reviews thusfar have been in agreement that it's very easy to get used to the speedometer on the center screen.

      Some people are amazingly resistant to change.

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    11. Re: What The Actual Fuck by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, while it may feel weird at first, it's actually safer. Putting the cluster in the middle puts it further away from you, which means you don't need to refocus your eyes as much. Thus, it's faster to look down, and faster to return your eyes to the road. We're talking about fractions of a second here, but it is measurable in the lab.

      Wasn't there a study a few years ago that showed that looking to the side caused people to steer that way too? Which was the rationale for car manufacturers putting much of the center console functionality on the steering wheel instead.

    12. Re:What The Actual Fuck by bazorg · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it's not a big deal. There's no engine speed, assorted temperatures and turbo pressures to go on gauges, so maybe it's fine to just have navigation taking most of the big screen, with a speed reading somewhere. Maybe even a HUD for speed and warning icons would be nice, but between voice warnings and a large font speed reading right in the centre of the screen, it probably is unnecessary.
      Everything else is really not for eye-level dashboard. Climate control should be automated, entertainment should be playlist based rather than having the driver fiddling with the touchscreen. At first glance it does look odd to me, just a disproportionately large screen and nothing else, but I'd love to give it a try and see how it feels.

    13. Re:What The Actual Fuck by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It's still a bad idea. If they wanted to remove the screen they should have added a HUD.

      I want to know the speed, battery reserves, consumption, which lights are turned on, and which of the doors are open without spraining my neck.

    14. Re:What The Actual Fuck by citizenr · · Score: 1

      $20 LCDs dont grow on trees you know.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    15. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better not drive if you can't move your eyeballs without moving your neck. Or if you can't turn your head +/- 20 degrees without pain. Fuck me, people are stupid.

    16. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Rei · · Score: 1

      In Tesla's ideal world, they'll soon be offering fully autonomous driving, and people will want that full screen for watching movies and the like while the car drives itself.

      Honestly, I think they're too optimistic on fully autonomous driving, but hey, I've got no complaints about getting a large screen :)

      --
      So, apart from that, how was the play, Mrs. Lincoln?
    17. Re:What The Actual Fuck by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      Yes, gas, quaint... it only powers 99.9% of all the cars in the world and will continue to so for a very long time...

      But don't let facts and logic get in your way...

    18. Re:What The Actual Fuck by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Well not so long. Governments are already setting the dates when Gas powered cars will no longer be allowed to be sold.

      Norway and Netherlands, 2025. India 2030. UK 2040.

      And the fact that governments are going to be banning sales in the coming years, means that no car company is going to spend any time creating new ICE designs. They're going to be finishing some existing developments, but pretty much all new car developments will be EVs.

      ICE vehicles are on their way out I'm very happy to say.

      Those are the facts and the logic, old timer.

    19. Re:What The Actual Fuck by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      You suck at math and politics... really, not joking...

      Those dates mean nothing, learn how politics works. Then learn math on how many cars exit in the world and how many are made each year.

      Try again sunshine...

    20. Re:What The Actual Fuck by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Well that was a contentless answer.

      Nothing wrong with my maths or political knowledge, sunshine.

      Those dates mean everything. No car manufacturer is going to design a car that increasingly will be banned in various countries. The early year of 2025 is only 8 years away. Car manufacturers want a longer life than that for a new car design. They'll do the odd quick makeover on existing designs, but there will be pretty much no new ICE cars designed now.

      What you are going to see is similar to what happened to CRT televisions. Flat screens were around for a few years, but were too expensive for all but commercial use and a few early adopters. Then the price fell till they were close to the CRT, then CRTs just disappeared out of the stores. You couldn't buy one if you wanted one. When the mass switch over happened, it actually happened really quickly.

    21. Re:What The Actual Fuck by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the mirrors! One off to the left, one way off to the right, one you have to crane your head to see - ALL the mirrors should be remounted squarely in front of the steering wheel.

    22. Re:What The Actual Fuck by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      I have spinal cord injury in my neck, from a car accident actually, whiplash. So no I can't turn my head easily and prefer to avoid it if possible.

    23. Re:What The Actual Fuck by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Which you have to use only when you change directions! Which is not something you need to do nearly quite as often! You also typically have a center mirror. Ever wondered why that is located there? Fucking Tesla sycophants. You're getting to be as bad as Apple fanatics.

    24. Re:What The Actual Fuck by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Turning your neck to see this information is OK in some shitty little $12k econobox, where they center-mount the gauges to save money in production costs (they can use the same dashboard for both left-hand drive and right-hand drive versions of the car worldwide). This car is not billed as an econobox, nor priced like one. You'd have to be as fucking stupid as Apple lovers to try to convince people that economy-level features are worth paying moderately-high prices for.

    25. Re:What The Actual Fuck by rpstrong · · Score: 1

      Which you have to use only when you change directions!

      Oddly enough, I use my side mirrors all the freakin' time when on multi-lane roads. 'Situational awareness' was one of the concepts that they pushed in Drivers' Ed back in the '70s, and it's something that's stuck with me.

      Which is not something you need to do nearly quite as often!

      Do you mean not as often as checking:

      [...] the speed, battery reserves, consumption, which lights are turned on, and which of the doors are open without spraining my neck.

      Fair enough, we each have our own priorities. But let's break that down:

      If I doing some serious speeding I'll use the speedo to keep it in double digits (i believe 100+ merits an extra point where I live; it certainly will affect a cop's attitude) but for normal driving I'm more interested in the flow of traffic - regardless of what that speed is.

      Battery reserves/consumption: I'm not sure why you need to know consumption on a continuous basis. Reserves are certainly useful to know, but only for occasional use. If I typically drive no more than 70 to 100 miles per day, and if I start off every day with a 200+ range, then I never give a damn about what my reserves are - I simply won't hit them. The same logic would apply to my current car - if I started each day with a full tank of gas, I'd rarely care what the fuel level was.

      Which lights are turned on, and which of the doors are open: And you need this on an HUD? Because how often do you need to know?

      You also typically have a center mirror. Ever wondered why that is located there?

      Yes, that's the one you have "to crane your neck" to look at. You not only have to look further to the side than you would to the see the speedo/alerts panel (top left of the display) in the Model 3, but you have to look up as well. I'm sorry, I forgot the 'facetious' tag - but I actually use that mirror as often as I use the side ones. And I did this for three months with a hard shell neck brace and a fresh plate in my spine - couldn't crane my neck if I tried.

      Fucking Tesla sycophants. You're getting to be as bad as Apple fanatics.

      Gosh, I just can't think of a pithy comeback. I guess you got the last word.

  9. Remember? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you remember when the President of the United States of America wasnâ(TM)t a sociopathic joke?

    1. Re:Remember? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me neither.

  10. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trumpâ(TM)s a cunt. His voters a fucking losers. Discuss...

  11. Re:Done with Tesla! by Poorcku · · Score: 1

    Volkswagen, is that you?

    --
    I take my children to see Madonna(..), but I never for once ever thought I was in the same business.Chris Rea.
  12. Re:Cancelling order by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised that the most high tech, all electric, legacy free car is the most popular on a tech news site.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  13. Re:Cancelling order by thegarbz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it ironic that the most popular car on Slashdot is also the most difficult to hot rod?

    Not at all. Many people even engineers and tinkered sometimes just prefer something well made that does not need to be touched or modified.

    Mind you there are plenty of people hacking at Telsas. It's just a different skill set.

  14. Interior design still terrible by nicolaiplum · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The interior designer they poached from Volvo clearly hasn't had time to improve anything yet. Since he was only hired 6 months ago, this design pre-dates him, and you can tell. It's terrible.

    All the display is to the side - so you have to look sidways and down to find out anything about the vehicle, even its speed. That means you are not looking at the road for longer.

    The display is high gloss - so you have to look through reflections and highlights to read the screen, it is not shaded from outside light at all. That means you are not looking at the road for longer and get more eyestrain.

    Trying to adjust any functions of the car without tactile feedback means you have to not only look to find what to press, but look to confirm the action happened correctly - so you spend longer looking at the controls and less at the road.

    It looks like an ergonomic failure and an unpleasant car to drive which reduces safety by increasing driver distraction.

    I don't even know if the seats are any good; the Model S seats certainly aren't.

    Then there is "unlock via app". So, what happens if your phone and the car are not online to the Internet? The Model S app-unlock is via the Internet, not any short range connection like Bluetooth. Let alone if your phone gets r00ted and the app key is stolen. There's a backup physical key - but if I have to remember to carry the physical key all the time what is the point of app-unlock anyway? They might as well implement having a key you have to have near the car for more reliable unlocking and better security - like every other car manufacturer. This is just more Internet of Shit Things (that spy on you).

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
    1. Re:Interior design still terrible by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The interior is well designed, spacious like a Japanese car and with lots of storage spaces. The videos people are posting show it's well made, better than the S and X. It's clean and simple, easy to maintain and attractive.

      The display is a daylight readable anti-reflection coated. The screens in the S and X don't have issues with readability.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Interior design still terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a real fucking moron if you think that's a well designed interior.

    3. Re:Interior design still terrible by c · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All the display is to the side - so you have to look sidways and down to find out anything about the vehicle, even its speed. That means you are not looking at the road for longer.

      It's at steering wheel height, even slightly higher than a typical console sits, so it's probably not that bad. The center gauge layout isn't unique... the Nissan X-Trail (and probably some other models) used to have that layout and you do get used to it rather quickly.

      The bigger concern I'd have is that screen is freaking busy with a lot of small details... Unless that's just a secondary mode and the real driving screen is more like a typical gauge layout I have a feeling the eye will linger on it a lot longer than is safe.

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    4. Re:Interior design still terrible by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The only thing it really lacks is the speedo in front of the driver. Other cars are similar, like the Mini with the speedo in the centre. With an EV you get much less feedback about your speed though, due to having no engine noise or big variation in torque as you move up and down the gear ranges. The design of the Leaf speedo is brilliant in that respect.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    5. Re:Interior design still terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing it really lacks is the speedo in front of the driver.

      And the lack of physical buttons, the seats, the touch screen that will break. There isn't a single good thing about that interior.

      Other cars are similar, like the Mini with the speedo in the centre.

      And it's universally agreed that those cars and the mini have terrible interiors.

    6. Re:Interior design still terrible by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      That too. There's little contrast in the relevant commands.

    7. Re:Interior design still terrible by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Control menus could speak through the audio system, assuming the car has one.

      Everything being electronic does make me uneasy re what happens when the puter shits itself -- safety and ability to drive. Conventional cars are already ludicrously expensive to fix when electronics go bad. Hell, I had to spend $600 having the "motherboard" in a fridge replaced.

    8. Re:Interior design still terrible by DavidRawling · · Score: 1

      Every time I see people agitating for only voice control, I wonder if they have ever tried it in anything other than perfect conditions.

      Hey guys stop talking so I can change the temperature.

      Sorry guys, stop talking again I want to change the radio station.

      Oh, sorry, everyone stop again so $passenger can change the seat settings.

      "Hey $car, what's our speed" is so much more ... useful than glancing at a dial or digital readout. Speaking at the car is so much better and faster than twisting a volume knob.

      Can't even listen to loud music, because you won't be able to tell the car to turn it down.

      And there's no way you would have to repeat anything to the car and everyone has the same accent. Set temperature to 25. 25. TWENTY ... FIVE ... Ugh OK, 29. NO TWENTY FIVE ah fuck it I'll just roast.

    9. Re:Interior design still terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The mini has two speedometers. An analogue one in the center and a digital one behind the wheel. The only one looking at the center one are the passengers.

    10. Re:Interior design still terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The design looks fine save that giant display. Get rid of that or shrink it by 75% and inlay it into the dash.

      The unlock stuff would be ok if I can permanently disable it. Same for any connectivity. I don't want my car internet connected. But these days I expect it can't be disabled.

    11. Re:Interior design still terrible by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Everything being electronic does make me uneasy re what happens when the puter shits itself -- safety and ability to drive. Conventional cars are already ludicrously expensive to fix when electronics go bad. Hell, I had to spend $600 having the "motherboard" in a fridge replaced.

      Most new cars on the road are completely computer controlled. The computer tells which spark plugs to spark, knows where the engine is in its cycle, etc. If the electrical system dies, so does the engine (the battery can die, though, if the alternator is working fine, but once you stop the car, it's dead).

      Every instrument in the dashboard is also electronic. Sure it has needles and such, but there's a servo behind it.

      About the only thing with direct linkages are the brakes - the parking brake lever to the rears, and the brake pedal to the master cylinder. (I said parking brake - most of those are no longer "e-brakes" and are not designed for emergency use).

      Throttles are servo-controlled nowadays (as are the kick-down switches now implemented as rate of change of the accelerator pedal rather than where the pedal is located, so "stomping it" can take place anywhere in the pedal's travel).

      Electronic ignition was also the first test of a RTOS - since spark timing is a hard real time task.

      There are typically two main computers in a modern car - the ECU which controls the powertrain only (being a hard real time task), and a Body Computer which handles the essentials elsewhere - from your electronic keys (which unlock the ECU), door locks, windows, alarm/immobilizer, dash gauges, etc. There are ancillary computers as well - your ABS is usually a separate unit, as is the airbags. Those are considered so critical that they're a separate computer rather than just another process on the body computer. (In the case of the airbags, they have capacitors that will store up charge to keep the airbag computer powered up during an accident and provide firing charges to the airbags in case the accident causes immediate electrical system failure).

      Note that things like door locks and door handles are also mechanical - the "power" part of it is an actuator that is designed to be mechanically overridden - no computer can lock the door and have the door remain locked.without actively commanding the lock to lock.

    12. Re:Interior design still terrible by MiSaunaSnob · · Score: 1

      Most HVAC controls that have dials are controlled by valves and vacuum pressure from the intake manifold, not servos or solenoids.

    13. Re:Interior design still terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I have to take my eyes off the road at speed to adjust anything, that's shit design. If I have to do that and go through menus, oh lordy.

      Physical buttons are still king for this, due to feedback and fixed placement.

      Check out this crazy F1 steering wheel. Wouldn't it be better if everything was just an anti-reflection coated touch screen? No, no it would not.

    14. Re:Interior design still terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know? Have you seen one in person? Been inside one? Or are you just shilling again like usual?

  15. Re:Cancelling order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm always surprised what people will find to complain about. It.never.fucking.stops.

  16. No dashboard by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty blind on my right eye. If this thing doesn't have heads up display, finding out my current speed would probably be less than ideal for safety.

    1. Re:No dashboard by Nutria · · Score: 2

      I'm not blind in that eye, but there's a damned good reason why important gauges are put right in front of the driver...

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    2. Re:No dashboard by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not blind in that eye, but there's a damned good reason why important gauges are put right in front of the driver...

      It's a car for people who hate driving. You can tell whether a car is for people who like driving by where they put the tachometer. If it's centered in the cluster, it's a driver's car. If it's off center, but still behind the wheel, it's a sporty car. If it's smaller than the speedometer, it's probably a diesel pickup. If it's hard to find, it's irrelevant. And if it's missing, then the car was designed for your grandmother. Of course, EVs don't really need tachos, do they? But they should have one anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:No dashboard by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      I'm not blind in that eye, but there's a damned good reason why important gauges are put right in front of the driver...

      Plus, the instruments usually are recessed, so that the sunlight does not make them unreadable. This tablet is completely unprotected from sunlight and from all the pictures I gather that it's also a glossy display. Seriously, making this the ONLY display for any kind of status information about the car is just a really bad idea. And that's totally ignoring the lack of any real buttons/switches which you can use without looking at them.

    4. Re:No dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's a car for people who want to take as little part in the driving as possible. It's designed as a car that drives itself most of the time. Even though the Tesla autonomy is not up to delivering on that yet.

    5. Re:No dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Minis have always had their speedo in the centre of the car. It's never harmed their sales.

      http://www.seriouswheels.com/p...

    6. Re: No dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet throughout the comments at least four different brands have been mentioned that have models with the gauge cluster in the center.

    7. Re:No dashboard by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      A tacho wouldn't really make sense on an EV. It would just show a linear increase with speed, as most just have a fixed reduction gear. Effectively it's a speedo with a different scale.

      Maybe the closest equivalent in an EV is the power meter.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    8. Re:No dashboard by Octorian · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, EVs don't really need tachos, do they? But they should have one anyway.

      A tachometer doesn't make any sense on an EV. But the equivalent, a kW meter, does. I rather like having one on my Model S. (I also like having a gauge cluster right behind the steering wheel, and the center screen being in an enclosed mount. Worried that the "detached" screen on the Model 3 is going to break too easily.)

    9. Re:No dashboard by lgw · · Score: 1

      There will be a new kind of enthusiast driver for electric cars, eventually. It's weird, when gas cars were new and primitive, enthusiasts and "modders" were most of the market, but electric cars as a whole do nothing for drivers yet. They're for an odd sort of tech enthusiast who doesn't want to tinker - perhaps "geek posers"? Well, it's a sizable market, whatever it is.

      Cars with the tach front and center, but an automatic transmission are the most humorous, of course. We'll never see the end of "sedan with spoiler".

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re: No dashboard by Strider- · · Score: 1

      Yes, tradition. When you look down, your eyes need to refocus to a radically different distance than basically infinity. It takes time for that to occur. It then takes time to shift back.

      Moving the cluster to the middle reduces that shift, making it faster. It also puts more of the road into your peripheral vision.

      Now whether it actually makes enough of a difference is debatable, but that's the theory behind it.

      --
      ...si hoc legere nimium eruditionis habes...
    11. Re:No dashboard by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      It's still crap. And you can't compare the contrast in both displays.

    12. Re:No dashboard by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      I've seen many videos of people driving Model S and Model X cars. And never once has the screen been unreadable, no matter what the light conditions or direction of the sun. Nor have I heard any owners complain about it.

      It's almost as if Tesla knew the panel was going to be installed in a car and specced it appropriately and adjust brightness on the fly as required.

      But hey, you go on coming up with the first objecti0on that enters your head, regardless of whether it's an actual problem with Tesla cars or not.

    13. Re: No dashboard by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Moving the cluster to the middle reduces that shift, making it faster. It also puts more of the road into your peripheral vision.

      When it's in the center, I keep my eyes on the road, and my peripheral vision tells me if the speedometer dial is approximately where it should be.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    14. Re:No dashboard by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm only a guy with human factors engineering experience. So please ignore my comments.

    15. Re:No dashboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not completely true, it is just out of the monetary range and Americans haven't as much income as they did during post WW2. There are certainly people racing these things, generally a Model S, completely stripped, can take on whatever.

    16. Re:No dashboard by lgw · · Score: 1

      A Model S is 2x as heavy as most stripped down club cars. Unless you're talking mostly-straight-line street racing, I can't imagine it doing well. And, heck, for that price you can just get Godzilla and have an actual supercar.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  17. And the best part by grungeman · · Score: 1

    From the article: "And the best part: when I pulled into park, I asked about the key. The car doesn’t haven’t one. You control the car through the Tesla app on your phone."

    So this is the best part of the Model 3, a car that costs at least $35.000? Are you kidding me?

    --

    Signature deleted by lameness filter.
    1. Re:And the best part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't need a phone so I guess RAM V8 Hemi for me.

    2. Re:And the best part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm pretty sure the key was a credit card RFID type thing that sat in your wallet in all the videos I saw.

    3. Re:And the best part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That lack of key is gonna be real great when tesla goes out of business and you can no longer use the app.

    4. Re:And the best part by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Is there a back-up option? Because I can tell you I wouldn't in a BILLION YEARS trust my smartphone (or any smartphone) to ensure I can go home at night.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:And the best part by cheesybagel · · Score: 2

      There is. A credit card like device.

    6. Re:And the best part by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That the best part is a feature where my first thought is "Can you permanently disable this?" doesn't bode well for me wanting this car.

  18. Nothing Special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With electric cars, performance doesn't really matter. They'll all accelerate at pretty much the same pace. So it comes down to Styling, Ergonomics, and Range.

    With range, the $35,000 is the same as the Chevy Bolt and will probably be less than the Nissan Leaf 2 and Opel Ampera-E. So a big collective meh there.

    With Styling, it's a 4 door Fastback (not a Sedan, as there is no boot). Many say it looks great, but from the profile, I think it looks like two parallel lines going from lower to higher. The front looks too small for the rear. Like the cephalothorax and abdomen of a spider. The grill also looks under designed. Yes, it doesn't need to have one. But they should at least make it more ascetically pleasing by making it look like it doesn't need one. From pictures it seems that there is a flat surface there just waiting to have it punched out for a grill. Maybe some front license plates with cat pictures will make it more appeasing. The glass roof is nice, but nothing new.

    Interior Styling and Ergonomics is abysmal. Many folks have chimed in on this, and I'll have to agree with them and not waste my time. I think it will appease the Tesla fanboys though. They seem to be the type who own iProducts. A HUD display and a smaller tablet, recessed into the dash with a couple buttons to control things would be much better IMO.

    I think the interior design hinges on the future of Autodrive. But I don't think the tech will be there for another decade.

    All in all, I'll stick to my ICE. Wake me up about 10 years from now if Tesla doesn't go out of business, cars are full auto, and the range (or network) can get me around 500miles on a charge (or quick charge) at highway speeds. But by then, every major manufacturer will be making electric cars in bulk. And most of them won't look so retarded.

    1. Re: Nothing Special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Tesla Model S 0-60 2.28 seconds, Nissan Leaf 0-60 10.4 seconds. You lost all credibility on your first sentence.

    2. Re:Nothing Special. by skullandbones99 · · Score: 1

      It will be all over for fossil cars in 10 years time. You are aware that Norway is banning the sale of new fossil cars in 2025 ? That is in 8 years time! I recommend you don't sleep for 10 years because fossil cars will be on the endangered list for going extinct in 2025.

      FYI. Norway is an oil producing nation in Europe that gets a high percentage of their power from clean hydro power. Norway has the biggest EV market per capita in the world. Currently 42% of new car sales in Norway are electric. This is because the Norwegian government is using big incentives for EVs and big disincentives for fossil cars in order to change their population's buying habits.

    3. Re: Nothing Special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is mostly software limitations preventing you from cooking the motors.

    4. Re:Nothing Special. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Norway buys how many vehicles per year? Oh that's right, not that much. Certainly not enough to change the rest of the world's production.

      DOT official numbers have electrics at 30% marketshare in the US by 2035. They've already missed DOE, 1-million per year sales goal, so they're behind in the biggest vehicle market in the world.

      So 10 years? No. You're either an electric fanboy or pray to a climate change god if you believe that. You can make the argument that when self driving cars become cheap and widely available, electric cars will gain market share significant market share, due to a need for general consumers to refresh their vehicles. At least here in the US, typical person owns the same car for around years. Some, such as my self, go 15 years. Assuming the infrastructure is built up enough and oil prices have not dramatically decreased due to less demand of increasing electric cars, it won't be until 2035 before electrics can compete with gasoline. It'll take another decade after that before folks who buy gas cars in 2035 will have to replace their vehicles. So on and so forth.

      Gasoline and Diesel are with us for a good 50 more years. Silly little socialist countries can ban them all they want. I Imagine we'll get a ban on manual driving before a ban on fuel type in the US. (Which buys magnitudes more vehicles than Norway does. In fact, I'd go as far to say the US buys as many vehicles as the whole of Europe.)

  19. yep, just what I expected by Osgeld · · Score: 0

    Another butt ugly tesla with design ques from 2-3 different good looking cars and slapped together with all the cheapness of a low cost GM

    1. Re:yep, just what I expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. It might be the worst car interior I've ever seen since the Yugo.

  20. exterior: B. interior: F. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The exterior is decent for a car in that price range.

    The interior though! That is horrible. No tactile controls at all. All the driver instruments mounted in the middle of the car so the drive has to glance sideways to see them. Even the beset anti-glare screens have problems in direct sunlight at certain angles.

    That looks like someone just wanted it to "look high tech" and damn any actual usability or human factors. The worst part is it doesn't even look nice.

    They really need to rethink the interior.

  21. Presidents STILL don't levy taxes. by jcr · · Score: 0

    Quit pretending that they do. The amount we're taxed is the fault of the congress.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Presidents STILL don't levy taxes. by jcr · · Score: 2

      Well, that was weird. I was reading the article about taxes, hit the post button, and it landed here. WTF, Slashdot?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Presidents STILL don't levy taxes. by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Well, that was weird. I was reading the article about taxes, hit the post button, and it landed here. WTF, Slashdot?

      It's been a problem for years now. Yay for buggy, unmaintained web "code".

  22. Re:Done with Tesla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks! Your check is in the mail.

  23. Re:Cancelling order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > created by a nerd

    Elon Musk is a cult leader like Steve Jobs, not a nerd. Please turn over your geek card.

    Stick yours up your ass & light it on fire.
    Musk programmed & sold a video game when he was 12 & has a B. Sc. degree in Physics. Jobs needed Wozniak to build him a circuit board that could play Pong so he could get a job at Atari.

  24. There's a reason the GT86 is better than other Toy by gweilo8888 · · Score: 1

    And it's because they don't actually make that, Subaru does. The entire mechanical design is Subaru, as is most of the engine and interior. Toyota just contributed the fuel injection system, external styling and the laughably outdated, 1980s red LED clock.

  25. Re: Cancelling order by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    False. The number of shorts orders is actually small. The difference is that these orders are massive. Most have been placed by oil and car companies, along with ppl like kock Bros who stand to lose 10s of billions when oil and car companies stock plummet.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  26. Touchscreens!!! by Waccoon · · Score: 1

    Everything operated by the touchscreen is the #1 reason why I hate Tesla and will never buy one. From a usability perspective, it's the dumbest possible thing you can do and the very definition of everything wrong with getting Silicon Valley to design anything.

    I sat in a Model S, and I thought just that was a disaster. Operating anything other than the wheel and pedals is ridiculous. I was hoping the Model 3 would have a more traditional interior because the vehicle was designed to be a bit more mainstream, but it looks like menu navigation while trying to keep your eyes on the road is here to stay.

  27. Uuuuugly interior - still not worth the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That interior is so ugly. I am at a loss for words other than to say, "ick." $35K and that is what they have? I guess I am too much of a gadget guy, but that is just... too simplified and I don't want to have to look to the right for my HUD, I want it in front of me.

    Electric-only just doesn't make sense to me, unless you can afford an extra car and don't mind be pinned down by charging station restrictions and having to wait around. Tesla, Bolt, Leaf, etc., no way, I'm not going to limit my road trips or be delayed over charging.

    I'll take a 3-year just off-lease Chevy Volt (not EV-only Bolt) any day for half to a third of the cost and no roll-off-the-lot loss in value. For my local commute, I'd be 100% electric. For road trips, good as a gas engine for range.

  28. Not the "electric car for the masses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks neat however this is not the "electric car for the masses". Only the $49k version is shipping between now and Q3 2018. When the $35k version does ship after Q3 2018 the $7.5k federal tax credit will no longer be available for Tesla.

    Moreover Tesla has no product in their roadmap that will be cheaper then the model 3.

    The cars that are closest today to being the "electric car for the masses" are the Chevy BoltEV, Nissan Leaf and Hyndai Ioniq. Get them before their respective federal tax credits run out and you'll have an affordable electric car.

    Overall I'm surprised I'm underwhelmed by the Tesla model 3 reveal. I remember when the Roaster, S and X all came out they surprised/impressed/excited me by pushing the envelope on what an electric car could do.

    I was hoping with a whole new powertrain, battery, electronics and a slippery body the base model 3 would beat the Hyundai Ioniq in efficiency or beat the Chevy BoltEV in range.

    The model 3 looks like a nice car but it is neither the affordable EV nor does it push the envelope in what a EV can be. This is certainly not the model T of the EV era.

  29. Tesla makes inferior cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and ponzi scheme stock without merit, tailored for egotistical people.

  30. Re:Cancelling order by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

    OOOH! Touchy much? LOL

    --
    PlaynBass
  31. Re:Cancelling order by PlaynBass · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for enough idiots to short Tesla to bring down the price basis to where I first bought in. That's only because I don't have an accounting degree to keep up with all the rules on when I can spend my Roth IRA investment account. Just lazy, I suppose, but I am hoping the shares will eventually increase to the point that I will be able to afford at least a used Tesla 3... or that the price will come down enough so that I can afford to buy one. I personally never liked working on cars, even when they were repairable by shade-tree mechanics like me...

    --
    PlaynBass