Slashdot Mirror


WikiLeaks Reveals CIA Tool For Hacking Webcams, Microphones (thestack.com)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Stack: WikiLeaks has released a new set of documents in the CIA Vault 7 leak, outlining the "Dumbo" hacking tool which allows control of webcams and microphones. The release explains that the tool is capable of completely suspending processes on webcams and corrupting video recordings. Dumbo's is tasked specifically with gaining and exploiting physical access to target computers used in CIA field operations, the release notes. According to WikiLeaks, the tool allows for the identification, control and manipulation of monitoring and detection systems, such as webcams and microphones, running the Microsoft Windows operating system. The technology first identifies all installed devices, whether they are connected locally, wirelessly, or across wired networks. Once Dumbo has detected all of these devices, it identifies all the related processes, which may include recording, monitoring or detection of video, audio and network streams. These operations can then be suspended by the operator. "By deleting or manipulating recordings the operator is aided in creating fake or destroying actual evidence of the intrusion operation," the release added. Dumbo does require direct access to the target computer and is run from a USB stick. The release states that it supports 32bit Windows XP, Windows Vista, and newer versions of Windows operating system. However, 64bit Windows XP and Windows versions prior to XP are not supported.

107 comments

  1. Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by bit+trollent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Interesting that Wikileaks is publicizing CIA documents while leaving their master Vladimir Putin, and his puppet Donald Trump unscathed.

    What - the FSB doesn't hack webcams?

    And of course, Wikileaks and Donald Trump are the only ones pretending that their puppet master Vladimir Putin didn't meddle in the US election.

    Ok - fine I'm shocked that the American spy agency has hacking capabilities... I mean, how else would we know that our "President" committed treason, aside from observing his complete subservience to Vladimir Putin and Russia's interests.

    1. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by jodido · · Score: 1

      You mean like signing the Russia sanctions bill?

    2. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by bit+trollent · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I mean like signing the Russia sanctions bill while opposing it, and making clear that he doesn't intend to enforce it.

      Trump only criticized the congress in his signing statement, not Russia who attack our country.

      Donald Trump is committing treason on a public and vast scale every day.

    3. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most likely because Russia regularly kills spies foreign or domestic if they fanny around with them the instant they are caught. And that happens because they actually take security seriously.

      Whereas over in the Americaland, they actually rely on fucking 3rd party AVs and 3rd party firewalls to operate.
      That's changing, sure, but the damage was done.

    4. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump's treason lies in the fact that he won.
      Not to be confused with the following evidence that Trump is Hilter: he dared to say the words "radical Islamic terrorism." DSers love the mussies, for some reason.

    5. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There have been a lot of leaks today of Trump conversations with other leaders and now of the CIA. Coincidentally after the Russians call Trump weak and start retaliations for the sanctions.

      This is what their foreign minister claimed would be an "asymmetric response".

      Wikileaks is just an extension of the Russian intelligence service.

    6. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You sure about that? Ever occur to you that maybe all this Trump Russia gate BS was all started to deflect from all the BS going on in "The Deep State" (AKA, The Swamp). Hillary would have played ball, but not Trump. THAT is what's going to fuck him, he went after the swamp. Bad bad move!

      Here's what the investigation is going be about, grinding him down in the mid-term election and prevent a 2nd term. In addition, he has no GOP support in congress and effectively a lame duck president. Both Republicans and Democrats are beholding to special interest groups in K street. So much so, the GOP would much rather have a Democrat controlled house if only to keep the corrupt gravy train flowing.

      Trump is fucked. He has but one and only option. That's launch an attack on N.Korea which will cause a shit-storm between China, Russia, and India. Declaration of war would be required, and Trump saved. Maybe, the Deep State would probably sacrifice a few US cities to as they're drunk on money and power.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    7. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia's 'attack' was completely ineffective. And they didn't hack the DNC. The democrats lost, on their own, without anybody's help. Accept it, embrace it. We don't need the Russians to tell us the democrats suck. Your tribalism is obvious. Whatever comes out of Wikileaks is bound to be more truthful than the propaganda coming out of the Times, Post, FOX, or CNN, all of which are busy retracting their lies.

    8. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't signing a sanctions bill targeting Martians into law you fucking moron.

      This sanctions law was passed because of Russia's attack on America, and Donald Trump is apologizing to Putin, and criticizing congress for standing up to Putin's attack on America.

      Traitors.

    9. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you forget that he attached babby's first essay where he whined and cried about checks and balances limiting his overreach to further collude?

    10. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The scary thing is how easily some Americans swallow Russian fake news stories, and become unwitting agents of the Russian government.

    11. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5???

      Jeezus! That wasn't politically moderated, aiding and abetting the democrat propagandists! No sir!

    12. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sometimes you have to wonder if posts like these are coming from complete ignorance, or someone actually being paid to spread disinformation.

      but just to educate you in case it is ignorance - Wikileaks has to RECEIVE THE INFORMATION before they can PUBLISH IT from a WHISTLEBLOWER.

      I think any competent network engineer can tell you the 'evidence' presented on Russian hacking was downright laughable - which makes me think you are not technically competent (WHY ARE YOU ON SLASHDOT???) or a paid troll.

    13. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are blind to Russia's obvious hacking of our elections, and you have the nerve to say that I'm not technically competent?

      You are a fucking moron.

    14. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      When was the last time you saw this many blood-thirsty Liberals, pushing our country towards thermonuclear war, one goose-step at a time?

      What happened to all the critical thinking, asking questions, challenging dogmas, questioning the authorities, demanding facts? Why do the liberal brains smell like the military-industrial soap these days?

    15. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once again, deflection from our comrades, the key indicator of a guilty conscience.

    16. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supporting treason often takes the form of a sad song and dance...

    17. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You MUST not be technically competent, and on top of that you can't behave like an adult. Great example of the people who have bought the propaganda.

      Cheers! :)

    18. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strong words from someone who writes at a 3rd grade level...

    19. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, projecting much? The trash is being taken out. Grand jury empanelled. Shut the FUCK up and take it up the ass, Ivan.

    20. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 50% of people tell you there isn't a dinosaur in your room, but you see it clearly, you literally know it's true, who do you think is wrong? Think about this, FFS. Wake up!

    21. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by bit+trollent · · Score: 5, Informative

      Blaming "The Deep State" for catching Donald Trump blatantly committing treason is just pathetic. He sold America out to Russia, and he got caught. That's Trump's fault.

      Our security agencies are just doing their job protecting us from Russia's attacks on our country. It is not their fault that Donald Trump colludes with Russia's attacks on our country.

      It is not the job of the US government to ignore Donald Trump's obvious crimes and treasonous actions.

    22. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...blatantly committing treason is just pathetic. He sold America out to Russia, and he got caught."

      There is yet to be an indictment and he hasn't been prosecuted (yet, possibly, if at all). So STFU

    23. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a grand jury, whose entire purpose is approving indictments now impaneled blocks from the White House. There can't be indictments without a grand jury, and just today we found out we have a grand jury. Won't be long now...

      And why would I have to shut my mouth, when we can all see that Donald Trump committed treason, and he continues to demonstrate subservience to Vladimir Putin and Russia in everything he does?

    24. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is treason. If there was, Trump would have been booted out long ago with the glee of both parties. So legally speaking, he hasn't done shit. That's why there's a fishing expedition going on.

      Get a clue!

    25. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What - the FSB doesn't hack webcams?

      Who cares about Russia? That's been a lost cause for centuries. Save what you can save. Also, whataboutism.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    26. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm new here...why did this comment get such a low score?

    27. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just to be clear, the alleged treason that you are accusing Trump of partaking is the alleged support of Russian Election hacking?

      And what was the alleged extent of that Election hacking?

      - Leaking DNC emails (via WikiLeaks)
      - Leaking Clinton campaign emails (via WikiLeaks)

      I want to be clear that liberals understand the accusation: Donald Trump won the election because he allegedly didn't stop Russia from leaking emails, which showed the horrible corruption of the Democratic party, including collusion with the liberal tenets of the media. And that's treason according to some.

      I have yet to see any evidence -- even from extremely liberal sources -- that suggests that there was real election hacking. There is a bunch of purported evidence suggesting that Russia (not Trump) was involved in the hacking of the DNC, but it was 100% from an organization that leaped to assumptions based on downloadable, out-dated, open source intrusion tools, and this is the same DNC that refused to share the server with the FBI. I can't imagine why a corrupt political organization would want to divert the attention from its corruption leaks...

    28. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people providing the evidence of Russia attacking the US are the same ones that provided the evidence proving Iraq had WMD's sitting on the launch pad at T-10. But I fully support sticking it to the Russians just for forms sake. They have been nothing but a gigantic pain in the ass ever since WW2. The most effective means of dealing with Russia is to enforce all existing sanctions, make sure US crude production stays high enough to keep the global price of oil sitting around $40 bbl or less, aggressively export US natural gas to Europe, every time it looks like Russia may draw down it's forces in Syria just lob a few cruise missiles at targets in Syria (making sure the launches pass directly over the Russian fleet stationed in the Mediterranean) or shoot down a few Syrian jets to make sure Russia has to stay and protect their client state, pull any remaining US diplomatic staff out of Russia leaving only the ambassador and a few support staff, next time one of their jets tries to buzz any US assets in International waters lock radar on their first pass and if they come around for a second pass splash them, and finally just ignore them.

    29. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about it? The comment didn't add anything to the discussion.

    30. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      because they don't have info on them or because fsb shit is plastered on the media already when it surfaces?

      because really it is. maybe not in the states but in other places it is.. fsb torture hotel etc - and also the suppression of said news inside russia is reported.

      you would know if you cared.

      however this tool.. eh.. a local program that scans for x processes and local mp4 files and kills them if it is run locally.

      super lame but I can see the PITCH that got them to pay money from this. btw the DUMBO in that deal was cia. it sounds like a cool concept if you don't stop to think about it for one bit.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    31. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vote Dimmocrat for MOAR WAR!!!1!!

    32. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1, Troll

      It is rather striking how the self-described "left" faction has become openly pro-war, and unashamed apologists for financial capitalism and systemic inequality.

      Indeed we live in interesting times.

    33. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alphabet soup contractors like you, running black propaganda ops on domestic media, are the only traitors I see around here.

    34. Re: Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pro-rape, pro-sodomy, AND pro-war - gentlemen, we've found the perfect Dimmocrat!

    35. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this post about again?

    36. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      If 50% of people tell you there isn't a dinosaur in your room, but you see it clearly, you literally know it's true, who do you think is wrong? Think about this, FFS. Wake up!

      Aw, c'mon! Who are you gonna believe? We, the ones who love you and feel your pain (while we pick your pockets clean, set you against each other like pit-bulls at an illegal dog-fighting event, seize your money without a crime being committed, and throw enormous numbers of you in prisons), or your lying, deceitful, eyes?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    37. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "WikiLeaks has released a new set of documents in the CIA Vault 7 leak, outlining the "Dumbo" hacking tool which allows control of webcams and microphones. The release explains that the tool is capable of completely suspending processes on webcams and corrupting video recordings. Dumbo's is tasked specifically with gaining and exploiting physical access to target computers used in CIA field operations, the release notes. According to WikiLeaks, the tool allows for the identification, control and manipulation of monitoring and detection systems, such as webcams and microphones, running the Microsoft Windows operating system. The technology first identifies all installed devices, whether they are connected locally, wirelessly, or across wired networks. Once Dumbo has detected all of these devices, it identifies all the related processes, which may include recording, monitoring or detection of video, audio and network streams. These operations can then be suspended by the operator. "By deleting or manipulating recordings the operator is aided in creating fake or destroying actual evidence of the intrusion operation," the release added. Dumbo does require direct access to the target computer and is run from a USB stick. The release states that it supports 32bit Windows XP, Windows Vista, and newer versions of Windows operating system. However, 64bit Windows XP and Windows versions prior to XP are not supported."

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    38. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by rayjay217 · · Score: 1

      oh yeah

    39. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cause if anything all russians did was show you how bad one of the candidates was awful..you already knew trump was bad

      hilary was just disliked in more places of the land

      and instead of attacking the bad cia for hacking billions of cameras and mikes your on about the russians showing you hilary is a crooked piece a shit?

      NO REALLY?

    40. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Interesting that Wikileaks is publicizing CIA documents while leaving their master Vladimir Putin, and his puppet Donald Trump unscathed.

      What - the FSB doesn't hack webcams?"

      If I were to venture a guess, and it's only a guess, I would say the reason you don't see more information leaked from Russia is likely due to the fact that most leakers end up DEAD.

      Death has a way of motivating folks to keep those secrets to themselves.

    41. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "for catching Donald Trump blatantly committing treason"

      All of us here on /. and the entire Department of Justice are eagerly awaiting the evidence to your claim.

      Don't quote what passes for the news these days because it's unreliable, biased and usually full of complete bullshit depending on which team they work for ( Blue or Red ).

      So, again, either your evidence on the matter or STFU.

    42. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The comment didn't add anything to the discussion.

      Yes it does! Israel has much more influence on American politics than Russia could ever dream of. All of D.C.'s politicians have to pass the litmus test of being absolutely pro-Israel (and settlements) before they get a dime of the party's money. Russia is small potatoes.

    43. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, c'mon! Who are you gonna believe? We, the ones who love you and feel your pain (while we pick your pockets clean, set you against each other like pit-bulls at an illegal dog-fighting event, seize your money without a crime being committed, and throw enormous numbers of you in prisons), or your lying, deceitful, eyes?

      I wager most Americans would trust "we", given their voting history of voting in the same lizards who tell them the same things in over and over

    44. Re:Wikileaks has no info on Trump's treason? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is fucked up! Who the hell is modding these lies up? It has to be the crybaby loser democrats who can't accept the truth.

  2. eh by butchersong · · Score: 4, Informative

    This doesn't seem terribly impressive. Local access required.. look at devices, suspend processes?

    1. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it requires administrator privileges. If you have administrator privileges and physical access (plugging in a USB stick), then you can do a lot more than corrupting recordings.

    2. Re:eh by AHuxley · · Score: 2

      MI6 and the CIA often has real humans to sneak in a USB stick. No changes on a trusted internal network.
      Data is collected and later collected by a human again.
      The other person, brand or nation still think their advanced firewall and internal network is totally secure.
      Different support for the different styles of the clandestine services. Some need network access, some has the human support role.
      Some network tools and AV products are getting too smart and report any and all changes.
      Local access is often the best way to avoid any traces and nothing new is detected down a network.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re:eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      None of these drops have been worth paying attention to.

      Assange has never known shit about actual security & can't code, started off trying to leverage other people to do the work for him... now he's flying the authoritarian flag and wonders why no actual security people will talk to him.

      eh.

  3. OMG!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The CIA knows that I like Hairy MILF porn and I think Trump is an asshole!

    But when they come for my neighbor for being just a Muslim, there is gonna be a problem.

    Yours - just an American Jew who actually learned the lesson of Nazi Germany - Unlike most Israelis.

  4. Get ready for my exclusive reveal.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yep, my DAMN balls for you to suck!

  5. Computers are insecure by 110010001000 · · Score: 2

    General purpose computers are insecure by design. They are meant to run software and software can be programmed to do anything. If you put anything of value on a general purpose computer you are foolish.

    1. Re:Computers are insecure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > General purpose computers are insecure by design.

      No, they're not.

      The widely-available general purpose computers used today were not designed with security in mind.

      The distinction is very important. The first formulation is an indictment of the _all_ general purpose computers. If true, it means that it's impossible to make a secure general-purpose computer. The second formulation is an indictment of an industry that doesn't see fit to keep security in mind when designing the devices upon which our modern economy relies. If true, it means that "business incentives" need to be realigned before we'll start seeing widespread deployment of secure computers.

    2. Re:Computers are insecure by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      and if you're buying something that is a fucking bat file on an usb stick as a spy tool on 10000% markup then..

      look, this isn't that great of a tool, ground breaking or novel or anything like that. it's hollywood inspired and it has a singular actual purpose: to make whoever sold it to them money.

      what it would BETTER be doing would be to load up on the computer and look on the network chinese dvr boxes and hack them. because THAT IS ACTUALLY HOW 99% OF ALL SECURITY CAMS OPERATE NOWADAYS. nobody in the countries they want to attack bothers with installing dvr cards when dvr boxes are cheaper.

      for this tool to be of any use you would already need to have so specific knowledge of the people you attack that you might just as well turn off the dvr software running on the computer yourself.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  6. power co.s etc.. thriving on late pay interest % by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hanging on to our hemispheres we chant.. cease fire stand down,, send us the clowns... & their clones

  7. They're not a hacking org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    > Interesting that Wikileaks is publicizing CIA documents while leaving their master Vladimir Putin, and his puppet Donald Trump unscathed.

    Wikileaks isn't a hacker organization, they can only leak things which people send to them which they can verify. Have you sent them any FSB docs lately?

  8. Distraction efforts by Smidge204 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mueller put together a grand jury for the ongoing Russia investigations. Later that same day, Wikileaks releases more dirt on the CIA.

    Honestly, how can anyone NOT at least suspect Wikileaks from being under Russia control at this point?
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so, wikileaks has made 20 releases in the vault 7 series so far.

      on average, these publications have been a week apart.

      since March.

      and one of the 20 being coincidental to the Mueller thing somehow indicates they are working together?

    2. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been releasing these for a long time. Months really. The fact that at some point in time during the releases Mueller puts together a grand jury is a mere coincidence.

    3. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what else has been on average, a week apart?
      Bombshell presidency-ending revelations, and massive Lies being exposed.

    4. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmmm....one of the weird things am surprised about (especially on a tech savvy website such as Slashdot) is that no one has pointed out that Wikileaks is now hosted on a Russian Server. A server that is, oh, about one or two blocks away from the Russian Intelligence Services. The move was made a couple of months ago.

      Gordon

    5. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...no one has pointed out that Wikileaks is now hosted on a Russian Server.

      That would be because it hasn't. None of the four IPs that wikileaks.org resolves to appear to be in Russia. At my site, the web page at wikileaks.org doesn't load anything from any other domains.

      RUMOUR

      SPIKED

    6. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you mean that Wikileaks released Dumbo after Mueller's action, you got your timings wrong. The Wikileaks release of Dumbo happened before, but got posted on slashdot just today.

      Proof, you can find at least this reference from yesterday to a normal (not technical) Italian online newspaper, sorry slashdot for some reason does not allow me to paste a link to that writing, just google it for yourself for "site:repubblica.it dumbo cia wikileaks"

    7. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's behind a CDN, (I'll check later), but indeed some of Wikileaks's IP's are in a Russian netblock, while others in Norway and Netherlands.

    8. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, how can anyone NOT at least suspect Wikileaks from being under Russia control at this point?

      Well, a subset of people who are uninformed, prone to kneejerk reactions and/or fond of unfounded conspiracy theories are likely to suspect that.

      Presumably, that subset includes you.

      For everyone else, among those who care in the first place, the circumstances in the real world do not indicate such a connection.

      Hint: Take a look at the history of Wikileaks releases leading up to the latest one. Note the fair regularity and non-uniqueness of the latest one.

      Or don't. Up to you.

    9. Re:Distraction efforts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason to think they are under Russian control. Certainly they are being used as an outlet for Russia-linked groups to publish their stuff. You could even say the Russians are riding on Wikileaks' reputation a fair bit. Assange is a douçhe but I think he really just cares about publishing dirt and getting the glory.

  9. Trump again ignores the Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's sad how little he knows. A thinking President would have never done this.

    1. Re: Trump again ignores the Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This action by Trump is treason.

    2. Re: Trump again ignores the Constitution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every breath he takes is treason since he stole the election.

    3. Re:Trump again ignores the Constitution by sabbede · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? Done what? Are you talking about a different article?

  10. CIA's gone soft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back in the day, if a president dissed the CIA, he'd get a parade in Dallas.

    1. Re: CIA's gone soft by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The government is not a monolith. There are still good men, honorable Americans, inside the government - even within the CIA.

  11. Such an indignity! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Funny

    it supports 32bit Windows XP, Windows Vista, and newer versions of Windows operating system. However, 64bit Windows XP and Windows versions prior to XP are not supported.

    We wrote all those lame webcam drivers but nooOOOOoo, not even the CIA will support Linux! >:(

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
  12. Maybe this is all just cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The two possibilities are:

    The NSA, despite all its supposed math/crypto geniuses and elite computer programmers/hackers is actually a bunch of inept academics targetting the lowest common denominator of exploits and security systems.

    Or...

    The NSA has allowed this information to be released to help cover up for their ACTUAL level of technical adeptness, a large percentage of which is tied to TrustZone, Intel ME, and AMD PSP, allowing them these same levels of bypasses, but without being tied to a specific operating system and making detection impossible since virtualization cannot sandbox it unlike the tricks that could be used to defeat their 'amateur' security system wiper/spoofer as depicted here.

    1. Re:Maybe this is all just cover? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or...

      They simply have agents working on assembly lines or in QA at computer manufacturers.

  13. Good news for all six of us still using XPx64! by ToTheStars · · Score: 3, Funny

    "However, 64bit Windows XP and Windows versions prior to XP are not supported." -- Of course, the same is true of most legitimate applications as well...

  14. Not supported my ass by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "64bit Windows XP and Windows versions prior to XP are not supported."

    Okay, This malware is known to work on Windows 2K3 Server - this should work on 64-bit XP by extension since it's almost-entirely the exact same codebase and kernel and driver model.

    This malware works on Windows XP 32-bit, which means that likely Windows 2000 is equally vulnerable as XP uses the Win2K Kernel and codebase (in fact they were both affected by almost all the exact same attacks. Anyone remember BLASTER?)

    This does not pass the smell test.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:Not supported my ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I checked the official docs for this, and I came across a rather interesting statement: The WOW64 subsystem does not support kernel-mode programs that are compiled for 32-bit operating systems, and WOW64 is used to execute 32 bit programs on 64 bit Windows XP. If this piece of spyware relies on some kind of kernel functions, perhaps this could explain it? Maybe my idea is stupid however, I confess to not having very much experience with Windows' internals.

    2. Re:Not supported my ass by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The WOW64 statement wouldn't apply to Windows 2000 supposedly not being supported while the malware supposedly works on XP 32-bit.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  15. Re: Wikileaks, the ultimate MASTER of leaked data by geekymachoman · · Score: 1

    Title is ironic.
    The parent post treats wikileaks as a ultimate, exclusive holders of all spy knowledge in the world, like it was given to them same god teleported stone plates to Moses while nobody was looking, or whatever.

    So wikileaks is now sitting on all that data given by god and other supernatural forces, and choosing not to publish FSB capabilities of hacking cameras and other crap.

    Are you fucking kidding me right now ?

    If there were documents floating around about FSB hacking cameras (as I'm sure they do), they would be published if not by wikileaks then by somebody else.
    What, is EVERYBODY on Putin's payroll trying to destroy America ? Are you that brainwashed ?

    In reality, nobody outside of US gives a fuck about US.. it's the US that's pushing their dick in everybody elses business all the time.. talk about meddling in other countries election.

  16. panoptic by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    Freedom is obsolete - big brother is always watching. But we've all known this for more than a decade, right?

  17. 50 Cent Army by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    The pro-war shills are out in force today! One of the alphabet soup agencies must have signed a new contract for domestic disinformation propaganda.

    I wonder which information warfare mercenary company is running this sordid operation? I don't doubt it's "lawful", so we can't call them traitors or criminals. But it sure as fuck is unamerican.

    A message to the footsoldiers of this 50 Cent Army: blow the whistle! Let the public know how domestic media are being targeted by MIC contractors. Sunlight is a great disinfectant. Americans deserve to know the truth!

  18. It's ignorant to think the U.S. only can do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People forget that other intelligence agencies around the world, including black and white hats, are also probably aware and constantly researching the same vulnerabilities. It is a little odd that Wikileaks only focuses on US government issues. Only people that have a grudge seem to ignore this fact. It's also possible that N. America has become a valuable scape goat for the rest of the world's problems. You break that cycle, then fueds start when red scared conservatives realize that countries like China, Russia, and N. Korea are more than just chopstix, diesel vans, and tyranny posters. Leaders of other countries need their voters to think the shithole they created is someone else's fault when really it's politicians like Theresa May that are scared shitless of a revolt. The spying and biometric data gathering has absolutely nothing to do with citizen safety. Comparitively, the U.S. actually ranks pretty low on the privacy intrusion vs. freedom scale. UK (Theresa May tyranny) > China > RU > Brazil > Arab > AU > US. All a U.S. Citizen has to do is stop using smart phones and start using cash; everyone else has to put up with CCTV facial recognition on the streets, VPN being illegal, gun ownership not allowed, etc. I had a ~1/20 chance of being born somewhere else. That's a scary thought. Count your blessings.

  19. CNN Producer admits the Russia narrative is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's bullshit.

    CNN Supervising Producer Admits Trump/Russia Scandal is a Lie, Itâ(TM)s For âoeRatingsâ
    http://consjournal.com/cnn-sup...

            BREAKING VIDEO: #FakeNews CNN Producer admits the CNN Russia narrative is "bullshit." #AmericanPravda

            More to come.https://t.co/m5lQ01keo1

            â" James O'Keefe (@JamesOKeefeIII) June 27, 2017
           

    1. Re:CNN Producer admits the Russia narrative is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're citing James O'Keefe, known fraudster and fake video guy? M'kay.

  20. Re:It's ignorant to think the U.S. only can do thi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > It is a little odd that Wikileaks only focuses on US government issues.

    Perhaps other countries Govt IT has decent security?

  21. I thought Wikileaks was for wrongdoing. by sabbede · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As in, "my boss is doing something wrong and the people need to know." Not for releasing the tools used by the CIA. What public benefit could there possibly be to putting the contents of James Bond's pockets on display? So far, I've only seen massive harm as malicious actors take these leaked tools and turn them into ransomware. Who should be sued for NotPetya, a Ukrainian firm that got hit, or Wikileaks for handing these exploits to the people who use them to hurt everyone?

    1. Re:I thought Wikileaks was for wrongdoing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about your faggy ass, faggot

    2. Re:I thought Wikileaks was for wrongdoing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Wikileaks is leaking CIA documentation on these tools and not the code. The code that was turned malicious in NotPetya was released by the Shadow Brokers from the NSA leak.

  22. Dumb fuck detected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah let's attack the messenger and ignore the fact that everyone in CNN has been lying their asses off.

    The Russia narrative is bullshit, CNN admits it when they think they're not on camera.

    Morons like you dont want to admit that tho, you dumb fucks like to be told what to think.

  23. I get wikileaks posting stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I don't get is why anyone who isn't Breitbart.com or Redstate posting crap from wikileaks.

    Apparently I need to drop slashdot from my circulation.

  24. When do we get a hardware indicator? by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    I get that we all want the cheapest stuff, but it's seeming more and more obvious that there's a real need for hardwired LEDs adjacent to the recording devices on things. Hack all you want, but if power to the mic means power to the light, there is an indicator that it's being used. And while it's possible for a spy organization to crack a device open, wire the light up differently, and embed system hooks to turn it on only when legitimate programs are open and not their spy stuff, that's a very heavy lift compared to the current requirements.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  25. Is this what paid trolls say, now? by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Calling assange a rapist apparently got old for you guys, huh? The last several years of disinfo shilling still failed to make people ignore wikileaks.

  26. Now that the US can propagandize its own.. by Rujiel · · Score: 1

    Next, the trolls will just be bots posting programmatically contrived garbage. As for who pays for these sorts of activities, Glen Greenwald's piece (through The Intercept) on paid trolling is solid https://theintercept.com/2014/...