Slashdot Mirror


China Working On 'Repression Network' Which Lets Cameras Identify Cars With Unprecedented Accuracy (thesun.co.uk)

schwit1 shares a report from The Sun: Researchers at a Chinese university have revealed the results of an investigation aimed at creating a "repression network" which can identify cars from "customized paintings, decorations or even scratches" rather than by scanning its number plate. A team from Peking University said the technology they have developed to perform this task could also be used to recognize the faces of human beings. Essentially, it works by learning from what it sees, allowing it to differentiate between cars (or humans) by spotting small differences between them. "The growing explosion in the use of surveillance cameras in public security highlights the importance of vehicle search from large-scale image databases," the researcher wrote. "Precise vehicle search, aiming at finding out all instances for a given query vehicle image, is a challenging task as different vehicles will look very similar to each other if they share same visual attributes." They added: "We can extend our framework [software] into wider applications like face and person retrieval [identification] as well."

80 comments

  1. Our police do this with scanners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    We already know our police drive around parking lots scanning license plates. This builds up a nice amount of location data of where the vehicle goes. Since it's in the public space, they get to do this.

    I wouldn't be surprised if any public cameras or perhaps red light cameras weren't sending location data of each and every car either.

    It's terrible and we as a society shouldn't tolerate it, but the majority will let it happen until things all fall apart. Unfortunately just how most of us humans are.

    1. Re: Our police do this with scanners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the summary and China said "unprecedented" therefore it must be true, and there simply is no other explanation.

    2. Re:Our police do this with scanners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean 'our police'? You can't possibly be in China because this is an American website that allows (shocking!) anonymous posting, and we all know that the Chinese government won't allow that, you might say something negative about them! Can't have any dissent, now can they? So you can't be a Chinese citizen, you must be in the employ of the Chinese government, out to spread propaganda in the West. What's your angle? Are you trying to lull us into a false sense of security before you start in with the oh-so-subtle pro-Communist rhetoric?

    3. Re: Our police do this with scanners... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      team from Peking University

      Funny, the fact that they still use the old Romanization of the name of the city is ironic: the're peeking.

      Our only hope now is that with this find they are peaking.

  2. "Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the network is ran in US, it is a "freedom" network. Spreading freedom can also mean dropping bombs and starting wars oversea.

    1. Re: "Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't forget that the CCTV networks in the UK are "crimefighting" and "freedom inducing." And that the EU endorses identification and tracking of its subjects in order to protect them from the horrors of Not Being Forgotten when they do publicly stupid shit.

    2. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      I found a member of the 50 Cent Army! ;)

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      If the network is ran in US, it is a "freedom" network.

      Yet an American is four times more likely to be arrested and incarcerated by their government than a Chinese citizen.

    4. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just because American men are more masculine than Chinese men. And, as we all know, masculinity is inherently toxic.

    5. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Chinese citizens just become organ donors and disappear if they do something wrong.

    6. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a statistical anomaly, that i like to call,,,, China doesn't have a long waiting list for executions,,, efficiency. Where as free enterprise uses its invisible hand to help keep people warehoused/locked up in America.

      slashdot fortune, stealthy

    7. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of home-grown cynics, now vastly expanded in numbers since the US started wholesale spying on its own citizens, and even now continues to fight to push backdoors into our encryption "for our own protection." I'd posit that our three-letter agencies and colluding leadership have done far more to alienate its own citizens' trust in their government than the collective effort of all the paid 50 Cent Army shills over the past decade.

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
    8. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      He's right though. I can see this coming to the UK already, as an upgrade for the existing number plate recognition camera system that covers the entire country. We already have additional face scanning cameras that photograph and record the biometric data of ever driver who enters or leaves the greater London area.

      The last lot were billed as "denying criminals use of the roads", which of course was bollocks and never happened. The face scanning cameras were quietly signed off my the mayor of London without any real consultation or public debate. Unfortunately people here have far too much trust in the police.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    9. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the network is ran in US, it is a "freedom" network. Spreading freedom can also mean dropping bombs and starting wars oversea.

      Aw :-( Your sentence is broke and needs fixed!

      If the orange is ran in Pear, it is a "cookie" network. Spreading apple can also mean dropping crumbs and baking muffins oversea.

      Fixed! :-) No need to thank me! :-)

    10. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 1

      The Brits have already discovered that when some event occurs that could be investigated using the nation's plethora of public cameras, that Big Brother happens to be off at the pub that moment and not at the police station monitor. This has led to increasing interest in automated interpretation of received images. License plate identification is an obvious first step, but the authorities are going to be very interested in this Chinese tech.

    11. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be clear, governments all over the world have a lot more in common than the people they rule. Cultures may be completely different, but if you want to find something in common, look no further than government.

    12. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Stinky+Cheese+Man · · Score: 1

      Apparently true. But that statistic is meaningless without knowing why people are incarcerated. You seem to be implying that the U.S. is more repressive than China. But note that the U.S. has more than six times the homicide rate of China. It would seem that the U.S. just has more violent criminals than China does.

    13. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by damaki · · Score: 1

      In france, years ago, CCTV name was changed from videosurveillance to the newspeak compliant videoprotection. Gotta love this.

      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    14. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      This is even better if you combine it with the existing number plate recognition. Then you can see if the plate matches the car. That would trip up a number of criminals, I bet. Of course, who knows how well this really works, because new cars are generally pretty identical. I'm guessing that it gets more accurate the older cars are, as they accumulate physical changes.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    15. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0

      Remember, since we're not perfect, that puts us on exactly the same level as people who starved millions of their own countrymen to death and regularly nonconsensually harvest organs.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    16. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      I agree with your evaluation.

    17. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I have to agree with this.

    18. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more objective name would be "the guilty before proven innocent network". Obviously they don't think I'm innocent; otherwise there is no logical reason to monitor me as if I'm guilty -- like a prisoner on probation.

    19. Re: "Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, exactly

    20. Re:"Freedom vs Repression" networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the fuck value are you adding to anything?

  3. Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mass-surveillance is really a sword with two edges. It's really useful for crime investigation and stuff, but there's also the usual "muh privacy" concerns.

    How can we find a balance?

    1. Re: Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Easy. We need to constantly monitor the activities of all the sexy, hot young female celebrities. Especially in the shower and locker rooms. For their protection.
      And then leave all of us ugly bastards alone.

      Perfect balance IMHO.

    2. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      How can we find a balance?

      At least on the road, we can't. Pea sized high-res cameras cost $3 in bulk. Soon there will be a dozen built into every car, facing forward, rearward, sideways, and oblique, as well as internal cameras to monitor the gaze and alertness of the driver. Every intersection will have a camera watching every lane. If you want privacy, go home, lock the door and pull down the blinds.

    3. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      How can we find a balance?
      Most nations looked at the UK and its CCTV ideas around the early 1990's.
      The Irish problem was getting interesting.
      Interesting people who had spent decades in the UK had no accents. No looking for new jobs or needing a new home in the UK. No very easy to report direct links to Ireland when renting or buying a home.
      Their jobs and paperwork was a good as any other person in any city area going back a generation or more.
      To counter such interesting people the UK had to surround its city areas with CCTV.
      Every van and truck, drivers face got counted in, tracked and looked up in a database.
      Other nations saw this as been expensive at the time but understood the thinking.
      Now every face, passengers face, rfid, cell phone, wifi, voice print gets the same database collection.
      The truck or van matched the driver and their occupation. Got a passenger? Is that new? Who are they?
      A rented van/truck with a face that has not been seen in a truck/van before? Thats much more interesting.
      The police and mil have something to work on in real time :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > To counter such interesting people the UK had to surround its city areas with CCTV.

      From experience in a visit to the UK: the paranoia about governments collecting personal informiton, described the novel "1984" was well justified. I'm afraid that the result of the enormous volumes of data is closer to that depicted in the movie "Brazil". They're not organized enough to use the data effectively, and the result is bureaucratic chaos. The chaos is funding efforts to scan the data for useful information, but each department and each manager in each bureaucracy has its own idea o the format, the relevant content, and the relevant analysis desired.

      The result of the masses of data is frightening, it _is_ widespread and analyzable. Fortunately for ordinary citizens, they don't seem well enough organized to use it effectively for large scale political repression. Also fortunately, flexible coders and database experts are paid quite well to provide results, even if the actual data desired is ill-defined and unlikely to achieve the desired goals.

      I was paid well for the work there, but the confusion about goals for the data analysis made the project useless in the long term. It was one of the contract tasks where I had to say "they're paying enough for our work, and the results will not be harmful because the goals are so very poorly organized".

    5. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      A simple measurement of how many crimes, of what type, are reported and prosecuted would be useful to assess its value. A similar report of its misuse and abuse would be useful, as well, but harder to gather from the agencies that collect the data.

    6. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re: "Fortunately for ordinary citizens, they don't seem well enough organized to use it effectively for large scale political repression."
      The idea for now is just enough time to get the mil to a van, truck, car or bus in time.
      A new look Mobile Support Unit directed by voice prints, cell use, wifi and driver facial recognition.
      Collect it all with local results.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    7. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      but there's also the usual "muh privacy" concerns.

      For these sorts of cameras, it's useful to be specific about exactly why the privacy concerns are there: because these systems expose innocent citizens to the whims of law enforcement and government. It's less a pure "privacy" thing and more a self-protection thing.

    8. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      If you want privacy, go home, lock the door and pull down the blinds.

      Even that is insufficient.

    9. Re:Put ourselves into the cops' shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember Alexa? Echo? your iPhone? your Smart TV? your Mac? your Apple Watch? This is 2017. Now fast forward 10-20 years in your imagination please.

  4. dam the days of packing snow on the plate to tolls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dam the days of packing snow on the plate to skip tolls are over.

  5. Violent crime in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much violent crime occurs in China? I could understand super surveillance in Chicago where there is mad violent crime. If we are moving to asurveillance society we need laws that stipulate that the video can only be obtained/decrypted with a search warrant. Also, that no crime less serious than felony assault can be charged based on the surveillance video.
    Video should be real-time encrypted with the decryption key securely held by third parties. If video of you running on the street naked leaks that's too bad. Don't do F'd up things outside the privacy of your home. You shouldn't expect privacy on public streets. We have the right to watch out neighborhoods. Total video surveillance can reduce serious crime by allowing the perps to be caught.

    1. Re:Violent crime in China by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      How much violent crime occurs in China?

      The murder rate in China is about one quarter the American rate.

      Violent robberies are about one sixth the American rate, although I would trust this figure less than the murder rate.

      I lived in China for several years, and never felt unsafe.

      Property crimes are a bigger problem, and unattended belongings may go missing.

    2. Re:Violent crime in China by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 2

      Domestic violence, especially rape, is also vastly under-reported.

    3. Re:Violent crime in China by Rick+Schumann · · Score: 1

      Of course it would be. Otherwise citizens could make a very valid argument that the government isn't doing a very good job. Even if some people have to die or be emotionally scarred for life, the health and well-being of the Party is more important than any single individual.

    4. Re:Violent crime in China by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      From what I see, it's not so simple as protecting the status of the party. From the first line of the Wikipedia article:

      > Rape is a common crime in China. Marital rape is not illegal in China. Same-sex sexual assault between males was made illegal in late 2015. [1]

      The article includes many relevant. It's been a longstanding accepted practice, as it was throughout history. The concealment of it and its frequency in china, compared to the more open investigations and reporting in the USA, makes comparing violence in the nations more difficult.

  6. Re: dam the days of packing snow on the plate to t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the days of packing my DAMN balls on ur chin have just begun

  7. Differentiates Honda Civics based on shape of spoi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like a solution that won't work well outside of Asia and Chinatown, but thanks for trying.

  8. Since when does the Sun get out of the firehose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. Mod Fail

  9. Seems problematic. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

    Just looking at the technology alone, it seems like this would be a problematic system, especially if you want to evade it. Car scratches and dents can be repaired, increase in number or even be faked (decals). Something as simple as your car being dirty and then cleaning it would fool such a system until it read your plate again. However, this just means it's good for short term recognition using high resolution cameras. The same applies for using it on people.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:Seems problematic. by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Something as simple as your car being dirty and then cleaning it would fool such a system until it read your plate again"
      The few cars that failed reading both front, back plates and driver facial recognition?
      New RFID registration https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ?

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:Seems problematic. by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      Something as simple as your car being dirty and then cleaning it would fool such

      If it's combined with plate reading and the same car keeps changing profile, you'd get put on the Suspicion List and watched more. I suppose you could trick it a couple of times, but keeping that up risks triggering the fiddling flag. (Now why does that sound perverted?)

    3. Re:Seems problematic. by messymerry · · Score: 2

      I was going to mod you up, but then decided to reply. I don't think the push is really for cars. The real effront (sp. ;-) is to get cheap viable facial recognition in the wild. The Digital Panopticon is almost upon us. This is going to become a very serious issue in the next decade.

      --
      Dear Microlimp: I give you 2 valid product keys for win7 and you reject both of them. Piss off you wankers!!!
    4. Re:Seems problematic. by OFnow · · Score: 1

      Fake scratches (easily removable and changeable) will make this useless in the case of real subversives, though for ordinary folks going about their day it will do whatever the authorities want it to do.

  10. The science of defeating deep learning... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

    ... can't be far behind. Eg. maybe they'll discover you can put clear tape on your car with a fake scratch printed on it, to be changed every day. Looks like technology will again help make life more complicated by a notch.

    1. Re:The science of defeating deep learning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... can't be far behind. Eg. maybe they'll discover you can put clear tape on your car with a fake scratch printed on it, to be changed every day. Looks like technology will again help make life more complicated by a notch.

      Sure... but by day three your car will be flagged as a vehicle of special interest and you will be stopped and questioned -and from then on you will be known as a person of special interest.

  11. It's OK when facebook does it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but when China does it's a "repression network".

    Zuckerberg not being a government official (yet) doesn't make him any less Big Brother.

    1. Re:It's OK when facebook does it by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      Again, the difference is that you don't have to use Facebook.

  12. And the "Mozilla Information Trust Initiative"! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To make matters worse, moz://a has recently announced the Mozilla Information Trust Initiative.

    In their words:

    Mozilla is developing products, research, and communities to battle information pollution and so-called ‘fake news’ online.

    So it sounds to me like Mozilla wants to perhaps control what content is available online, or at the very least be the one who deems what is "correct" and what isn't.

    How they hope to accomplish any of that with a browser that has only 5% of the market now, and is also likely losing users, is a mystery to me, however!

    This makes the Firefox 57 release not seem so bad now. With the switch to WebExtensions, it's expected that many existing extensions will no longer work. This will likely drive away even more of its few remaining users, rendering it even less relevant. If Mozilla wants to be policing online content in any way, then I think we're better off having fewer people using Firefox!

  13. e-Paint by fox171171 · · Score: 1

    which can identify cars from "customized paintings, decorations or even scratches"

    So time to paint the car with eInk that can change randomly. Fake scratches and dents that move around and change shape.

  14. On the positive side ... by timholman · · Score: 1

    China's investment in surveillance tech means that you can buy some really amazing weatherproof high-resolution varifocal cameras from Chinese manufacturers (e.g. Dahua) for a fraction of what such cameras cost ten years ago.

    It's revolutionizing home and business surveillance in the U.S.A.

    1. Re:On the positive side ... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I'm far from convinced that's a positive.

  15. Leading the way in thought crime enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next up; Santa Clara county.

  16. Easy To Fool by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    Attach a band aid to the exterior of the car and the identification system will fail. Any alteration in the cars appearance will drive current computers bonkers. As it stands right now the cops can read the plates of every car they pass and get a hit on which cars are stolen. But as it stands lots of car thieves are being taken away due to the current technology. It will become a much more robust system with more and more recording stations set up to catch people.

    1. Re:Easy To Fool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure it would be that easy to fool. Deep learning/fuzzy logic is based on confidence levels. So add a bandaid to the side of your car and confidence goes from 100% to 99%. It's still going to be the top match amongst a list of possibilities.

    2. Re:Easy To Fool by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      > ttach a band aid to the exterior of the car and the identification system will fail.

      If it were that precise, even ordinary road dirt and shadows would obscure it beyond usefulness. I'd expect such a system to use broad categories to reduce the size of the search space: number of doors, rough color, rough shape of the rear end, and details of the bumpers would help narrow the search space tremendously and allow more meaningful comparison of the details of the car.

  17. University researcher == state actor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Since when do headlines claim " did X" when someone in some university did X?

    Oh yeah, when it comes to China and Russia, then any individual action you don't like becomes state action in the headlines.

    "America Working On DNA-Based Exploit of a Computer System - which use faked blood or spit samples to gain access to university computers, steal information from police forensics labs, or infect genome files shared by scientists"
    https://science.slashdot.org/s...

    "America Fires Red Team Staffers Who Gave Defcon Talk"
    https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    "America Shamed, Smeared and Fired Engineer For Speaking Out"
    https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    "America Refuses To Enable Phone Emergency Settings that Could Save Countless Lives"
    https://mobile.slashdot.org/st...

    Fake news much?

    1. Re:University researcher == state actor? by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      So Chinese corporations have the same degree of autonomy as US corporations? Even in the US, corporations are often proxies for the government.

  18. That will never be used for harm by OYAHHH · · Score: 1

    NOT!

    --
    Caution: Contents under pressure
  19. Re: dam the days of packing snow on the plate to t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who got hit on the chin by more balls?

    1) Yogi Berra
    2) Rock Hudson

  20. Re: And the "Mozilla Information Trust Initiative" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Said the Google employee.

    Too bad not all of you can be as progressive as Mozilla. Have fun at your town hall meeting, neanderthal.

  21. At least this tech might also be useful... by jenningsthecat · · Score: 1

    ...to help self-driving cars correctly identify defaced street signs.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  22. Not Admissible In Speed Court by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are they gonna say? You're fined $100 because they took a picture of a car that 'looked' like yours? Prove it!

  23. Repression by jandersen · · Score: 1

    Yeah, being able to identify stolen cars even after they have had a paint job is repression, of course it is. Everybody knows it is basic human right, stealing other people's cars and selling them on.

  24. Do I detect a hint of racism? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    [quote][...]could also be used to recognize the faces of human beings. Essentially, it works by learning from what it sees, allowing it to differentiate between cars (or humans) by spotting small differences between them.[/quote]

    Is that the Chinese government's way of saying that all those Chinks look the same to them?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  25. Nothing to see by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    This is just an idea published by some Chinese researchers, actually a fairly pedestrian idea based on recent approaches to machine learning in computer vision. The researchers were clever in choosing a controversial name for their approach ("a repression network"), but there is no indication that this approach is actually used anywhere, in China or elsewhere, whether it would scales to millions of cars.

    BTW this is the same thing with face recognition. On curated databases of tens of thousands of faces taken in reasonably good condition, face recognition achieves very high scores, better than humans (who would remember 10,000 faces?) but in the real world, not so much, the technology is not that useful yet in practice. It will probably come though, eventually.

  26. Finally! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Now I can sell millions of magnetic scratch and imperfections decalcs in China.

  27. Only one step away by quonset · · Score: 1

    What will China come up with next? A Mobile Oppression Palace?

    Perhaps Matt Groening shouldn't give them any more ideas.

  28. Funny name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh China...

  29. On the other hand by computational+super · · Score: 1

    We just saw that self-driving cars can be fooled by putting a strip of duct tape on a stop sign. I'm not sure how realistically accurate this is going to end up being.

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  30. Use a car with only mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will help keep you anonymous.

  31. Copycats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As usual, China copies western tech. A 'Repression Network' is already deployed in Google offices.

  32. Oh, great. by JohnFen · · Score: 1

    Now we'll start seeing that deployed in the US.