Slashdot Mirror


Video Is Coming To Reddit (variety.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report from Variety: Videos are coming to Reddit, thanks to a new feature that allows users to upload video clips directly to the service. Reddit rolled out the new video feature Tuesday after testing it with around 200 communities over the past couple of weeks. Reddit users are now able to upload videos of up to 15 minutes in length, with file sizes being limited to 1 gigabyte. Users will be able to upload videos via Reddit's website and its mobile apps for iOS and Android, with the latter offering basic trimming functionality as well. And, in keeping with the spirit of the site, Reddit is also offering a conversion tool to turn videos into animated Gifs. Videos are being displayed persistently, or pinned, meaning that users can scroll through the comments while the video keeps playing in the corner of their screen. And community moderators can opt not to allow videos in their Subreddits at all, with Le arguing that some discussion-heavy Subreddits may decide that the format just doesn't work for them.

74 comments

  1. At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, and they got there before unicode at Slashdot.

    1. Re:At last by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 2

      They should change their name to "Seenit"

    2. Re:At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should change their name to "Seenit"

      Or "Fappedit?"

      [*ducks*]

    3. Re:At last by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      I've heard that Unicode at Slashdot is scheduled one week after the release of Half-Life 3.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:At last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half-Life 3 confirmed!

  2. Porn by Nidi62 · · Score: 2, Funny

    See subject

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
  3. Good. by thadtheman · · Score: 1

    Ever since Damore, I've been concerned about videos like CppCon and BoostCon along with "XXXX" meetups being posted on Youtube. It's nice to have an alternative.

    1. Re: Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is reddit any better than YouTube when it comes to censorship? I'd expect it to be worse. In my experience reddit is generally a much less tolerant environment than YouTube is.

    2. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're concerned about Google's censorship and thought-policing so you're moving to fucking Reddit? It's like moving from Barcelona to Tikrit because you're concerned about all the terrorism.

    3. Re: Good. by thadtheman · · Score: 1

      It increases competition. It means that I don't have less reason to be stuck on youtube. It means that other forms of competition have less barrier to entry ( ie LBRY ).

    4. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dafuq? you really think that CppCon videos are going to be censored?

    5. Re: Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Reddit was completely overwhelmed by extremist and corporate shills years ago.

      If you use just the niche subs, it's not so bad, but anything which shows up on the front page is liable to trigger brain cancer.

    6. Re: Good. by ArchieBunker · · Score: 2

      The place is pretty much an echo chamber.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    7. Re:Good. by zidium · · Score: 1

      Obvious sarcasm is obvious!!! Sheesh!!

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    8. Re:Good. by Un-Thesis · · Score: 0

      Holy shit!!! I remembered my password after forgetting it for TEN FUCKING YEARS!!! Please give me some karma cuz my rep is "bad" :(

      --
      Promote freedom; fight fascism.
    9. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obvious slashdot password is obvious.

  4. rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Let the rick-rolling begin!

  5. Wait until the SJWs undo it all by eclectro · · Score: 0, Troll

    How soon before we see a "purge" like what his happening now at Youtube with all conservative content? Censorship is running rampant on Youtube with videos AND comments being deleted outright. And by the way, if you equate conservative content with the Alt-right or Nazis; then go to hell. And the same applies if you deny it happening or justify it.

    I'm an adult, and I can decide for myself what to watch or what not to watch. Something that evil-doing Google seems to have lost grasp of. That seems to be all the rage these days, protecting special people from being offended with some censorship here, some more censorship over there and maybe toss in a job firing. Not to mention their attempt at 're-educating' me by throwing videos I don't want to watch in my face.

    I truly hope that reddit avoids this mess.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    1. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I ever saw any actual, real, conservative content on YouTube, then I would agree. If I ever saw any fact-based, reality-based argument from the right on ANY topic, then I would agree. But that's not what I see. EVER. The content you are talking about panders to people who regard propaganda and "performance art" as reality. It is an airborne virus that ignorant people are especially susceptible to. The platform of YouTube is being used as described by Joseph Goebbels, leveraging the openness of a free democracy to destroy the very core of democracy itself. If any of what I'm describing was NOT the truth, then parodies, SNL skits, shaming videos, and stand up comics alone would have been enough to keep trump out of the white house.

      The content you are referring to is truly dangerous. If YouTube does not purge this content, it should at least tag these videos as "art", rather than let them masquerade as true news media outlets. And YouTube cannot have it both ways. I personally will not support, nor allow my usage of any site to generate dollars for hate mongers. It's not enough to just turn away, or "not click on it." This is a disease, and cutting off their money supply is the cure.

    2. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like orthodox Jews.

      -=* BeauHD *=-

    3. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly rite. Conversatism is a disease & should be stopped at all costs.

      -=* BeauHD *=-

      Learn to spell, FauxHD.

    4. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How soon before we see a "purge" like what his happening now at Youtube with all conservative content? Censorship is running rampant on Youtube with videos AND comments being deleted outright. And by the way, if you equate conservative content with the Alt-right or Nazis; then go to hell.

      Then.. you just pretty much dammed yourself to hell for doing just that. Or maybe you don't actually grasp the difference between conservatism and the vile crap spewed by the "Alt-right and the Nazi's". (A theory given credence by the fact that you maintain the delusion that there is substantive difference between the two.)

    5. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by eclectro · · Score: 1

      The content you are referring to is truly dangerous.

      And that is for me to decide. Not a bunch of SJWs (who thinks the "ok" hand symbol is somehow white power) to protect the perpetually offended.

      The fact that you think you know what I have been watching and say with a straight face that it is "truly dangerous" shows just how full of horseshit that you and your ilk are.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vile crap is spewed by both ends of the spectrum, just look around for radical left twitter accounts and you'll find calls for murder on "nazis" also known as alt-right, threatening to kill "nazi babies" etc. It's really not much better and in their case there's rarely any censorship applied, I mean, alt-right are nazis and nazis are bad, right? So it's fine to encourage murdering or beating them up because we don't like their views.

      Conservative content, regardless whether it's reasonable or not, gets censored but vile and repulsive liberal content survives completely unchecked for years if not indefinitely and you don't ever hear of authors of such getting banned or deleted on news sites. That's the problem. If you're a conservative, you're automatically under more scrutiny than even the most violent and unstable liberals. If you want censorship, apply it equally to both ends or not at all.

    7. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by schleimkeim · · Score: 1

      How soon before we see a "purge" like what his happening now at Youtube with all conservative content?

      > conservative content You are so full of shit. God dammit, I swear internet comments get dumber every day.

    8. Re:Wait until the SJWs undo it all by Vrekais · · Score: 1

      But the issues at Youtube are that advertisers are pressuring them to only show their ad on content that doesn't go against the companies guidelines. Film companies don't want their films advertised before a video preaching racial hatred. Seeing as YouTube, Google and the people making the videos rely on ad revenue to fund themselves, the site being perceived a non-advertiser friendly could and has cost them significantly. Even channels that provide news coverage of the recent marches and terrorist attacks have been flagged by advertisers, not even content in support of those things, just journalism.

      So they're stuck between building better systems to indentify content the advertisers don't want to be associated with and either removing or filtering it, or loosing the larger advertisers entirely and potentially leading YouTube into financial decline.

      How is that in any way Google being evil?

  6. One more custom adblock filter to add I guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck 'sticky' elements that follow you as you scroll
    Fuck embedded videos pretty much anywhere
    And, most of all, fuck reddit

  7. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by CaptainDork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless Reddit is the gubmint, "free speech" is out of context.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  8. What a laugh by Khyber · · Score: 1

    You thought your energy, storage, and bandwidth bills were high before... and you're still not really making any money, and thought this was a good idea?

    Try firing your corrupt administration, first. You might have enough money to BEGIN to afford the drain you just put on yourself.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re: What a laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sooner reddit makes itself unsalvageably financially unviable, the better off we are! We should encourage them to do potentially wasteful and costly stuff like this. I think that the Internet, and sociey as a whole, would be healthier without reddit.

    2. Re: What a laugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll just get bought out by Verizon.

  9. Great experiment by s.petry · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it's going to work out as well as the optimists think! What could possibly go wrong?

    --

    -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

  10. Because Pepe the Frog gifs are not enough. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reddit will sink under the ever-expanding load of white supremacy porn.

  11. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an irrelevant distinction. There's still no reason why they can't strive to maximize free expression, regardless of whether they're a public or private institution.

    They need to choose whether they want to be a discussion platform or an indoctrination platform. A discussion platform will support free expression for all. An indoctrination platform, on the other hand, will allow free expression for some, but with these select few also being allowed to control what everyone else can express.

    This takes the discussion back to what the original comment in this thread was saying. Reddit's problem is that it's currently far more like an indoctrination platform than it is like a discussion platform. They should fix that problem long before they start adding in stuff like videos.

  12. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    upholding free speech is the responsibility of a free society, not its government. Typically, it's cultures unwilling to deal with uncomfortable truths that seek to silence others, hence the similarities between the left and these neo nazi groups..

  13. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

    Unless Reddit is the gubmint, "free speech" is out of context.

    You have posted this comment in /r/pcmasterrace, you have been automatically banned from /r/politics /r/worldnews /r/twoxchromosomes /r/offmychest /r/rape, 11/25 default subs, etc.

    Please enjoy your stay on reddit, where echo chambers reign supreme.

    --
    Om, nomnomnom...
  14. Re: How about fixing the abusive moderation? by KGIII · · Score: 1

    Free speech should be a social objective, not just a matter of law. No, it needn't be absolute, but it should be the default.

    I have no opinion on reddit. I just have an opinion on freedom of expression.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  15. Kotaku in Action by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0

    Now we'll finally have a place where gamers can post videos about peacefully putting Jews in ovens.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  16. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lefties and proggies don't believe in free speech or liberalism.

    Okay, put down the broad brush, and rethink your view of the world.

    People, no matter what part of the political spectrum they identify with, are not so easy to pigeon-hole as you want to imagine.

    And BTW, there are plenty of lefties and righties who believe in free speech and liberalism (in the sense of liberty.)

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
  17. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    No, there is a huge different between how leftists approach free expression and how people of other political persuasions do.

    Centrists and moderates tend not to care what people express. Since they don't care, or are ambivalent, they have no reason to try to influence what is or isn't expressed.

    Those on the political right tend to take free expression very seriously. In the US, these are people who are the strongest defenders of the First Amendment. Freedom is a cornerstone of the political right's system of beliefs. They want everybody to be able to express themselves freely, regardless of what is actually expressed. They are very much against censorship and the moderation of online content.

    It's the political left who, as part of their foundational beliefs, wants to exert control over how and what people express. They're the ones forcing the idea of "political correctness". They're the ones who deem certain ideas to be "unacceptable" and thus inexpressible. They're the ones who want to enforce censorship. They're the ones who push for online comments to be deleted, for commenters to be banned, for domains to be deregistered, and for service providers to censor their customers.

    The events of the past week should make it clear that it's leftists who go well out of their way to suppress the free expression of everybody else.

  18. Why would you turn h264 etc. into gif? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Every single browser can play the modern formats in a thin frame, why would you ever need to use gif? It's a brilliant way to take high-quality video and turn it into something bulky, sluggish, in low fidelity. Are you stupid or something?

    1. Re:Why would you turn h264 etc. into gif? by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Because some of us prefer 256 color video. Check your privilege.

  19. Introduced Video Feature on Reddit by businesswindo · · Score: 0

    A great experiment by Reddit team, rolled out video features to be streaming on reddit web. An interesting to see on it.

  20. Video pinned in the corner while you scroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds like an introduction to intrusive adds. If you try to use an add blocker you block the content. People universally hate the player, there is definitely a financial reason they are stubbornly pushing it. Reminds me of when digg tried to aggressively monotize its user base and ended up alienating them.

  21. So The Shills and Bots Can Watch Them? by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

    Because let's face it, enough of their traffic is exactly that to keep driving narratives so things constantly hit the front page that probably wouldn't organically get there in the first place.

  22. Featuring reddit's horrible compression and sizing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reddit's image hosting is already the worst thing to happen to the internet with their retarded resizing to some awkward resolution and awful quality. I'm sure it won't be any different for video.

  23. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Whibla · · Score: 1

    Indeed.

    I do find it both troubling and amusing that while you were modded down for saying that the GP was modded up.

    Let's try to lay this out so even the biggest "words can hurt me" snowflakes can understand it:

    Ok, so "congress shall make no law ... prohibiting the free exercise ... or abridging the freedom of speech". We get that. But where does that freedom of speech come from in the first place?

    I'll tell you, it's a natural, inalienable right of every person! Natural in that it applies to everyone, inalienable in that it can't be given away, and it can't be taken away. Not businesses, not individuals, not churches, cults, charitable organisations, no-one! Just because the founding fathers felt the need to explicitly state that the state couldn't restrict that right doesn't mean that anyone else can. They can't, and attempting to restrict someone's right to free speech is wrong*!

    Honestly, some of the sheer idiocy I see here just boggles my mind!

    *This is not to say you are free from any consequences resulting from what you've said - I realise that this is a common argument / misconception regarding free speech.

  24. Does this mean they have to change their name? by sabbede · · Score: 1

    Watchdit?

  25. Video Is Coming To Reddit by RahulEkbote · · Score: 1

    Well that's a great news, now no more using youtube videos on reddit...

  26. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Whibla · · Score: 1

    Let's try to lay this out so even the biggest "words can hurt me" snowflakes can understand it:

    I don't like replying to myself, but, on reflection, I regret this choice of words.

    While I tend to think that, for the most part, offence is taken not given, I am sorry if anyone was offended by this part of what I said.

    I stand by the rest of the post though.

  27. so ...videos for dummies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so ...videos for dummies?

    after all 200 posters in a north korean thread don't even know that the usa and other nations are still technically at a state of war with north korea , and when you tell people and finally get upset about it they ban you...any videos there are just for the mentally handicapped that are always at that site

  28. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly - it is part of the system. Upvote/Downvote doesn't reflect disagree. Take, as an example, a post that I made, which has a negative score. I never engage in political debate (other than to crack jokes) in Reddit and this is why:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/world...

    Someone said: "I didn't vote for Trump, so I don't deserve him as a president" (100+ karma). The response was "Most of us didn't vote for him, just not the right combination of "us" I guess. Thanks Electoral College." (120+ karma).

    I said (in summary): "Trump's party carried the majority in House and Senate. Trump carried a majority of states in popular majority and a majority of in popular majority. He got more electoral college votes than the other candidate. We live in a system where it is not a popular vote, and the person that you want elected isn't necessarily the person the country wants elected."
    (-11 karma)

    At -11 karma, this post is effectively removed from discussion. I take those downvotes to mean "I don't like Trump so I don't like your comment".

    That said, there are plenty of (non-political) communities where good advice is plentiful. I HIGHLY recommend bodyweightfitness and BuyItForLife. The discussions of "how to do a handstand" and "how can I buy higher quality socks without wasting my money" are relatively safe from downvotes (people who disagree with your handstand/socks advice will rebut rather than try to downvote). I have ~2K karma overall on reddit for fitness advice, jokes, purchase advice.

  29. Just under the wire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before the violent hateful violent alt-left drives everyone away from it.

  30. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those on the political right tend to take free expression very seriously

    Until a gay couple dares to hold hands, or a black group dares to carry guns to a capitol building, or a store clerk says "Happy Holidays". Don't delude yourself.

  31. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice to see that some people can use their brain still. Tired of all the pigeon-holing on the news, "whites this" "blacks that", "left", "right", so many stereotypes. It's prejudice and it's rampant.

  32. Anti-Flash turned out to be bad by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    So, now we've migrated from Flash (boo!) to HTML5 multimedia...

    - Every site wants to include video, no matter how inappropriate
    - Every site wants the video to autoplay
    - Every site wants it to be as intrusive and distracting as possible, impossible to scroll past and ignore

    I've been worrying for a while we made a mistake in demonizing Flash. You see, Flash you could just disable. Because it was a security risk, there were a hundred browser extensions and features making it easy to block Flash on a case-by-case basis.

    But video? Mozilla won't even provide a UI to allow you to disable autoplay, and if you do disable it via about:config, it's an all-sites-or-nothing thing. I've actually switched to using Firefox to browse the web, and Chrome to view videos if I find one I want to watch.

    This is horrible. Do I want Flash back? The worst part of that question is: I don't know. I really don't know. Between the abuse of video, and the introduction of non-standards for DRM by the W3C effectively closing the web, I think Flash was better.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Anti-Flash turned out to be bad by hackel · · Score: 1

      None of your arguments have anything to do with the medium. Whether Flash or HTML5 video, browsers could implement identical controls. Flash is garbage for *technical* reasons. I'm sure there are already extensions out there to handle disabling autoplay on a site-by-site basis, exactly like we had for Flash. Personally, I *always* set Flash to click-to-play site-wide, and so doing the same for HTML5 video makes perfect sense. This is really a non-issue. The benefits of HTML5 video completely trump this minor issue.

    2. Re:Anti-Flash turned out to be bad by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Whether Flash or HTML5 video, browsers could implement identical controls

      But they don't. They don't feel the need to. That's the point. I even made it above.

      They refuse to on two grounds: that there's no compelling security reason to, and that it would break the web standards they signed up to. The standards applying to how you included a plug-in were always somewhat vague and Mozilla et al were able to comfortably implement click to play.

      Why don't they do it for video? Because they can't without breaking the standards. Because there are websites like Youtube that break if you disable autoplaying video.

      So they don't. So we're in a worse situation than we were before. You can say "Oh, but that shouldn't be the case, there's no technic..." let me stop you there, the REALITY, the actual situation we're in, is that browsers do not let users control when videos load and start, because HTML5 video turns out to be a worse standard than Flash.

      It didn't have to be.

      But it ended up being one.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  33. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course the champions of truthiness don't want to suppress speech, they're too busy suppressing people.

    The Birther-in-Chief stirred the American soup, and turds came to the surface. Those little shits are whining because their KKK ways aren't working anymore. And they can't blame their woes on some crypto-muslim anymore. Thanks Obama!

  34. Bullshit, look up the definition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    free speech n.
    the right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.

    NOT LIMITED TO GOVERNMENT. See store for details.

    1. Re:Bullshit, look up the definition. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supporters of censorship often deliberately conflate Free Speech with the United State's First Amendment, which incorporates Free Speech against the US governments.

  35. yay by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    More things for reddit to sensor and shadow ban!

  36. Turn videos INTO animated GIFs? Huh? by hackel · · Score: 1

    That is going the wrong direction. Why would anyone want to take a nice video, increase the file size tenfold, and reduce it to 256 colours? That makes no sense.

    I've always hated the recent resurgence of this antiquated, terrible image format, but this is a new low. Fuck you Reddit for continuing to spread this garbage.

  37. Just what we need.... by superdave80 · · Score: 1

    ...more video on the internet. Because there's nothing I like better than sitting through a three-minute video to get 10 seconds of information that I could have read.

  38. Re: How about fixing the abusive moderation? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    I question your use of the word, "should."

    If you're a legislator pondering the wording of a Constitutional amendment, then fine.

    Freedom of speech is a protection against being arrested by the government.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  39. Re:How about fixing the abusive moderation? by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

    I have never been to Reddit; don't know any of the TOS; don't know the etiquette; have no motivation to go there.

    I do, however, know what freedom of speech is.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.