Slashdot Mirror


How the Voyager Golden Record Was Made (newyorker.com)

Fascinating article on The New Yorker about how the Voyager Golden Record was made: The Voyagers' scientific mission will end when their plutonium-238 thermoelectric power generators fail, around the year 2030. After that, the two craft will drift endlessly among the stars of our galaxy -- unless someone or something encounters them someday. With this prospect in mind, each was fitted with a copy of what has come to be called the Golden Record. Etched in copper, plated with gold, and sealed in aluminum cases, the records are expected to remain intelligible for more than a billion years, making them the longest-lasting objects ever crafted by human hands. We don't know enough about extraterrestrial life, if it even exists, to state with any confidence whether the records will ever be found. They were a gift, proffered without hope of return. I became friends with Carl Sagan, the astronomer who oversaw the creation of the Golden Record, in 1972. He'd sometimes stop by my place in New York, a high-ceilinged West Side apartment perched up amid Norway maples like a tree house, and we'd listen to records. Lots of great music was being released in those days, and there was something fascinating about LP technology itself. A diamond danced along the undulations of a groove, vibrating an attached crystal, which generated a flow of electricity that was amplified and sent to the speakers. At no point in this process was it possible to say with assurance just how much information the record contained or how accurately a given stereo had translated it. The open-endedness of the medium seemed akin to the process of scientific exploration: there was always more to learn.

122 comments

  1. Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And that'll be all she wrote.

  2. Hmmmmm.... by redmid17 · · Score: 1

    "Etched in copper, plated with gold, and sealed in aluminum cases...."

    Seems like the New Yorker wrote a super long unnecessary article when the Slashdot summary only needed part of a sentence! Par for the course (for both).

    1. Re:Hmmmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well although the title does say "how they were made"... really it's more about "how they came about & were realized". Not so much as the physical manufacturing process you noted.

    2. Re:Hmmmmm.... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Dear aliens, humans often argue over different interpretations involving our vague spoken languages. Please ignore.

  3. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Rei · · Score: 1

    Depends on what you mean by "interstellar debris". Space is very, very, very empty.

    --
    Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
  4. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not very likely. Space is, to coin a phrase, is big. All the stuff there is hardly amounts to anything compared to space. The average density of the universe is roughly one atom for every four cubic meters.

    Now gravitation will tend to steer the things to places with more matter, but if you were to send the largest thing made by humans through the densest part of the Asteroid belt, in all likelihood it would encounter nothing but a few stray atoms.

    Our mental pictures of space are corrupted by science fiction, which for dramatic purposes draws upon nautical imagery: storms and shoals and the like. But most likely events in navigating space, other than slowly cooking in radiation if you're in the vicinity of a star, are all system failures. Natural events will be a once-in-many-lifetime occurrences. There are no "ion storms" in space; asteroid fields would appear to human perception as utterly devoid of anything.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  5. Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by AlanObject · · Score: 1

    I wonder if we were going to re-do it today if we could come up with better media? A billion years of memory retention ain't bad but this was 1972 we were talking about. Computer RAM memories were still mostly magnetic core with a 1.6us cycle time.

    What would we use today?

    1. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by green1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Considering the current state of the art in storage devices... probably something that degrades to unreadable before it leaves our solar system.
      "progress" has not been good in the "improve longevity" part of data storage.

    2. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      Woosh. The record was physical on purpose. Deep space radiation for millions of years (plus the radiation from the planetary fly-bys) would kill any technology that would fit on the spacecraft.

      Making a physical data store any smaller would reduce the likelihood of long-term data integrity. Consider the effects of millions of years of deep space travel: radiation, micro-meteorite impacts, constant unfiltered UV light, etc.

      I'd say that we would probably use the same thing, plus a replica sent Arecibo style.
      ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... )

    3. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by green1 · · Score: 1

      I'd actually be more interested in seeing information on the instructions given to play the record, and what details of it are thought to be enough to allow an alien species to both understand it, and actually accomplish it. It seems to me that it almost needed to include some form of record player, but that adds to the complexity, and the likelihood of failure.

    4. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by aliquis · · Score: 2

      Just give them texts describing how monotheism is the thing and how it's important to worship the one god just right. .. have them kill each other off arguing which way that is.

    5. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by MrLogic17 · · Score: 1

      Prego, it's in there. Second image on the article:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      more details:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    6. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Rei · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we could do it better today. If we were willing to make the decoding more complex, we could make it digital with error-correcting codes, allowing for much higher amounts of data storage at the same level of durability, or conversely much more durability at the same level of error storage.

      Physical indentations with a precious metal coating is probably the best storage means available today. But a on-off linear representation rather than wasteful grooves would be a much better choice. Also, if we were willing to pay a higher production cost (and make for much more complicated playback), we could go 3d in the data representation.

      I'm looking at the images and it's funny to see things go obsolete that the team probably never thought of as potentially becoming obsolete. For example, this image. Whoops! ;)

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    7. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by green1 · · Score: 1

      While I can view the cover image, it doesn't really speak to me enough to build a record player. And the detail from Wikipedia explains what it says, but doesn't really explain why they think it's the right way to say it.

      That's the part I'm curious about, why do we think that those particular images will explain how to play the record in a way that any intelligent species could figure out?

    8. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It should be immediately obvious to anyone who examined it under any sort of microscope (regardless of their sensory inputs) that there's analog data encoded there on the grooves. They shouldn't even need "instructions" to recognize that and digitize the data. A spectral analysis should show variations in frequencies, with all sorts of clustering. Regardless of what senses they perceive through, they should be able to map it to one or more of them - either as 1d data, or in 2d as a spectrogram. Enough analysis should allow them to determine that most of the audio is acoustic vibrations, so they'd map it to whatever method they best use when studying or perceiving acoustic vibrations.

      Analysis of the the image section should readily show that there are 115 distinct groupings, each comprised of 3 similar patterns of 512 separate signals, and that each separate signal is correlated with but subtly different to the one before it. This should suggest 115 groupings of 2-axis data measured over 3 related but distinct parameters. Which they can then map to whatever they use best to perceive 2-axis or 3-axis data. Again, further analysis should be able to figure out analogues of certain images to natural phenomenon that they recognize (for example, images of planets and moons, or the solar spectrum diagram). This would then let them figure out that the images represent optical data on specific frequencies of light in the visual spectrum, which they could then map to however they best prefer to represent light in that spectrum.

      In short, I have no doubt that they could properly "read" the records. It's more a question of how much they could actually understand of the content. The silhouettes look to be particularly confusing. And even "natural place" images could be highly deceptive - for example, this island. If they knew nothing of trees, that might be percieved as a type of aa lava on top two dissimilar layered volcanic or sedimentary features.

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    9. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ** data storage

    10. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by AlanObject · · Score: 1

      It's more a question of how much they could actually understand of the content.

      I get your point, but I would think that any species/entity that would/could actually capture and analyze the record to that extent would also have a fair amount of experience in environments not like their own native environment.

    11. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really are a complete fucking idiot. It's amazing someone so stupid can even remember how to breathe.

    12. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd actually be more interested in seeing information on the instructions given to play the record, and what details of it are thought to be enough to allow an alien species to both understand it, and actually accomplish it. It seems to me that it almost needed to include some form of record player, but that adds to the complexity, and the likelihood of failure.

      If they are intelligent, which they have to be in order to recover the ship, they will understand it immediately. People underestimate what a one-billion-year old civilization is capable of doing.

    13. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Because any intelligent species getting the record would immediately stick it under a microscope to see what the grooves were for, notice the grooves are wriggly, and conclude they probably store information. A little more study and they would determine that it's actually one very long, continuous groove, and the instructions take it from there.

    14. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by green1 · · Score: 1

      Do they though? can you really see how to make an image from those grooves without reading any of the explanations?

    15. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The aliens might be used to 8-track tapes and think the disk is merely a Frisbee ;-) (Included is a diagram on how to play it, along with a needle, by the way.)

      I do agree if they spend a reasonable amount of time analyzing it, they'd eventually figure out how to "play" it; but the finders may not be so motivated, perhaps because they are in a hurry or have very limited resources when they find it.

      Suppose you were wandering in the desert with a small group and your trip has been rough such that you are short of resources. You may encounter a great artifact from antiquity, but you may just toss it aside being you risk draining too many resources to carry and/or analyze it.

    16. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      We could figure it out quickly. Someone that much smarter would do so that much more quickly.

      You have to hypothize idiots with the brain power of a monkey and no senses like ours to stand a remote chance of failure.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    17. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      [...re-do it today if we could come up with better media?] probably something that [doesn't] degrades to unreadable before it leaves our solar system.

      Fat chunky "bits" does help longevity. Cosmic rays and faster-than-bullet dust will pummel the disk or any medium. If the info were more compact, then redundancy may be needed to fill in the gaps caused by such space weather. If you get too clever with packaging, the aliens may not be able to figure it out or maybe won't have the patience for "puzzles".

      Perhaps the info could be digitally etched into chips made of a tough material, such as platinum or diamond, and add redundancy. They could then be stacked but with something soft in between the layers so they don't fuse over time.

      It would be an interesting calculation to see if larger bits or more redundancy on smaller bits gives such chips the greatest survival chance, per volume of info. What's the optimum bit-size/redundancy mix? (Based on expected damage patterns.)

    18. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by green1 · · Score: 1

      The OP seemed to think that because technology had come so far since the first records were made that we'd have a better way now. My point was that technology surrounding data longevity has not really progressed since that time. If anything, modern storage methods have much worse longevity than the older forms.

      You just can't get much better longevity than "stuff etched deeply on a strong surface" This is why we can still read stone tablets from centuries ago, but can't recover data from some CDs that are only 20 years old

    19. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But the etching choices are probably better now than they were in the 1970's, at least cheaper for NASA/JPL. One can buy laser-etched rocks/glass/metal at consumer prices now, for example. That kind of thing was very expensive in the 70's. In that sense we have progressed.

      But I agree that it's different technology and/or a different problem from consumer-oriented products. Longevity is not a consumer manufacture's key concern, and they have thus sacrificed that factor to gain in others. We could say technology has given manufactures more ways to cut corners.

    20. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by green1 · · Score: 1

      It goes beyond that, because consumers chose the cheaper options, manufacturers stop making the more expensive ones, meaning that even institutional types can't buy them. It's getting much harder to find archival grade storage medium because it's just not cost effective for companies to produce it when very few people buy it.

      Beyond that, when developing a new technology, why bother looking at longevity as part of the design specs when nobody will pay for it?

      If you want try long lasting storage, you're left looking at older technology, much older. So to say that we'd design something today that's likely to outlive what we designed several decades ago is really just wishful thinking. The thing we designed several decades ago is estimated to last over a billion years, do you really think we'd do better than that today? Sure maybe we could do the same thing for cheaper (though that may not be the case either to be honest) but I doubt we'd do something that has more longevity.

    21. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The thing we designed several decades ago is estimated to last over a billion years, do you really think we'd do better than that today? Sure maybe we could do the same thing for cheaper (though that may not be the case either to be honest) but I doubt we'd do something that has more longevity.

      That's what I'm wondering. The Voyager disk has "wasted material" that is used for merely structural integrity. If every portion of the recording disk/object had info encoded into it, then perhaps it could have more info and/or more redundancy. I'm thinking of some kind of crystal or crystal like structure. Let's say the record had to be no more than 2 ounces in weight. Then you make a crystalline structure(s) where every spot in the 2-ounce crystal encodes data, not just the surface of a disk.

      Although the Voyager disk bumps in the groves are rather large by today's "bit-size standards," they are still at risk by not having redundancy. If a micrometeorite hits and makes a 5mm hole in that disk, the info at that hole is gone. But if the same data were repeated in a different portion of the recording substance, there'd be spare copy. A micrometeorite or radiation event would have to hit both to remove all copies. With enough copies, maybe it would last for say 3 billion years instead of 1 (per equivalent data loss). What's the best balance of bit size and redundancy to get the most longevity?

      Suppose you had a billion dollars today to make something of equivalent weight and size of the Voyager disk. What would you do different to increase the data capacity and/or longevity?

    22. Re: Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen more than one person figure out how to get images from slow scan radio signals on their own without documentation or even awareness of how TV signals worked. They were just bored people with a funny signal they had an intuition that it contained more info, well short of a team that have exposure to many tried formats.

    23. Re:Never buy Release 1.0 of anything by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      If you focus on the ends (intention); Send LOTS more with enough initial acceleration and better gravity assist tricks as to cover more destinations faster. This is, taking the proverbial message in a bottle but dropped in mass from an airplane all over the world's oceans.

      Now if you focus on the means (tech), not long ago /. had an article on a way to store information etched in the structure of some special crystals. Cant find it right now but I doubt it was spaceproff in any way.

      Maybe we cant really do it any better 50 years later, same as with music :)

  6. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by green1 · · Score: 1

    While true, it's still far more likely that the record will eventually hit a rock of some form than that it will land in the hands of an intelligent species. Space may be empty, but of what we do know to be out there, a much larger portion of it is some form of rock than is intelligent life.

  7. stupidest shit ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if we were going to re-do it today

    this is the stupidest shit ever

    I wonder if Bill Buckner had not let the ball roll between his feet

    I wonder if the assassin had not missed De Gaulle

    I wonder if I had won the lottery

    does it get more stupid than this?

    1. Re:stupidest shit ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just did.

  8. ufo connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do you believe in aliens?

    1. Re:ufo connect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get in touch through the printer from Russia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RirqnBUQTEU

  9. Fools at NASA... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    All they had to do was ask Elvis Presley - he had 90 gold albums!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    1. Re:Fools at NASA... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      gay music for aliens?

  10. Obvious answer who will find them by burtosis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given they have historical value they will for sure be recovered by humans, and relatively soon. We know where they are and people will probably use thier return to demonstrate thier capabilities even if there isn't a finnancial reason. If I had to bet I'd say less than 500 years. By then we could send craft far faster and further making voyager less relevant.

    1. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      We need to manage to get back out of low earth orbit first before assuming we're going to make it into interstellar space anytime.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by bobbied · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So... You think we are going to get such speeds soon? Right now, the best we can manage it likely about 1/2 C using ion engines (unmanned one way trip, no stopping at destination). The limiting factor is how much propellant we can actually get onto a craft along with a nuclear reactor big enough to power things. Also, the most efficient ion engines use Xenon which is in pretty limited supply.

      I'm not seeing any promising space propulsion technologies that will get something useful going any faster myself.

      Hard to know what we might invent in 500 years, but if you are working on any kind of propellant based system you will be limited by nozzle velocities and the weight of the propellant. Assuming you can get 90% of C nozzle velocities, you are going to have a problem getting any useful load going 50% C while keeping enough propellant to stop when you get there. If you want a two way trip, just the propellant weight will increase exponentially.

      50 % C is simply not fast enough, assuming we could actually get to that speed...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    3. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If history has taught us anything, it is that our ancestors will create a portal in space-time through which we can jump to distant solar systems.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I would say it is unlikely anyone will ever find them. Considering the size of the probes compared to the vastness of space, it's unlikely any alien civilization would just stumble upon them. Second, they are moving relatively slow in space, it will be sometime before they reach any thing. Voyager 1 is moving about 2AU per year (300M km). The nearest solar system (Proxima Centauri if Voyager was even headed that direction) is 268142.2 AU. That means it would reach Proxima Centauri in 134071 years if it was headed that way.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    5. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hard to know what we might invent in 500 years,

      Extrapolating the tendencies we see around today, we won't make it 500 years. We will be in full retreat into a hunter-gatherer life style.

    6. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you! You're not supposed to know about that portal thing that our ancestors will create! Report for re-education immediately!

    7. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's harder than you'd think.

      We have precise trajectory data, so a future craft should be able to catch up. That's not the problem. It's turning around again: The delta-V needs would be huge.

    8. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you imagine what will happen if we sent out a craft at 50% C speed and it eventually hits a planet at that speed? I know it will take some time before the ion engine can bring the craft up to that speed, but after that, it's basically a blind speeding bullet with the kill power of a huge asteroid if it hits anything sizable at all.

      What would happen if an alien intelligence sent a half ton craft at 50% C and it hit our moon, our planet, neighboring planet (say Mars for example) or just another asteroid in the asteroid belt? Assuming it was made of material which can survive for 1000s of years and cross vast distances in a hostile environment, I assume it will be pretty solid. Solid enough to be a planet killer if it hits a rocky planet like earth?

      Not saying we shouldn't. I know space is vast, empty, etc. But that one in a zillion chance, if it happens, will you be willing to be responsible for that?

    9. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by burtosis · · Score: 1

      It's not a problem for a robotic probe and simple nuclear fission engines. The impulse efficiency (nozzle velocity of mass) is several orders of magnitude higher for many types of engines including ion drives and nuclear fission engines, both of which are old technology already. .5C dosent factor into anything the voyager probe had a single chemical rocket engine provide the minority of the energy while a few slingshot flybys created the majority. We are chasing a model T ford let run down a short hill using a tesla to use a car analogy. .

    10. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by burtosis · · Score: 1

      Not a problem with nuclear fueled craft, much less something exotic like antimatter that may be feasible in just 400 years.

    11. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 2

      In 4 billion years, the Milky Way, 400 billion stars, will collide with the Andromeda galaxy, 1 trillion stars. It's highly unlikely any stars will collide.

      The odds of this thing hitting a star are nonexistent. Of hitting a planet is that divided by a few thousand.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    12. Re: Obvious answer who will find them by Rei · · Score: 2

      Yes, I remember when History aired that episode...

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    13. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by ckatko · · Score: 1

      Where we're going, humanity won't need eyes, either.

    14. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by SCVonSteroids · · Score: 1

      The odds of this thing hitting a star are nonexistent. Of hitting a planet is that divided by a few thousand.

      I'd be careful with trying to divide 0 my friend...

      --
      I tend to rant.
    15. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by bobbied · · Score: 1

      LOL.. Voyager is traveling a whole lot slower than 1/2 C.. But that's not my point.

      I'm saying that with nozzle velocities at 1/2 C you will have issues thrusting a space craft of any useable weight to speeds approaching 1/2 C. Chemical propellants are not efficient enough (weight to thrust/Impulse) . Ion thrusters are much better but. Right now, ion thrusters only accelerate the propellant to maybe 100 Km/s, which isn't even 1 % of C. We are going to have to do a lot better with propellant nozzle speeds to get the specific impulse up high enough to make any kind of travel outside our solar system possible in a lifetime.

      Obviously this all depends on Newtonian physics, so I suppose it's possible that our understanding of physics might be incorrect, but I'm not counting on having to scrap 4,000 years of scientific thought, experience, observation and the math that explains it all any time soon....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    16. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by burtosis · · Score: 1

      I still have no idea what you are even talking about. Voyager 1 is moving at 38 thousand miles an hour. A nuclear power source and a much improved ion drive could catch it in only a decade. Return in another 2, simple for a robotic probe only perhaps 40 years in the future. Lol it was a crappy chemical rocket from the 60s not alien tech.

    17. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Sorry, didn't realize you intended to go get it and bring it back.... Doubt anyone ever decides to do that. There would be no point to head to the edge of interstellar space and return.

      My discussion was assuming you want to go someplace outside the solar system and happened pass one of the vehicles along the way... We are not leaving the solar system for another and return even a radio signal. We simply cannot go fast enough unless the laws of physics get changed...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    18. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by bobbied · · Score: 1

      But you CAN divide by zero if the other number is small enough! At least that what they said during my calculus class...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    19. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

      Probably not. It's been out there for nearly 50 years. Even if they did, they'd probably find a note in its place - Switched the original with this Sgt Peppers Lonely Harts Club Band record. Laying on top of the stack is Twilight Time.

    20. Re:Obvious answer who will find them by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that the spacecraft have a potential be to be around for a very, very long time. Even if they only pass by a star every few hundred thousand years, in a billion years they will have passed by thousands of stars. It's very likely they'll still be floating through space when the Sun goes into its red giant and engulfs the Earth. Eventually they may hit something or get sucked into a black hole, but they could still exist for billions or even trillions of years after the Earth is gone and the Sun is just a remnant. So while it's still very unlikely they will ever be found, I'd say the chances are better than you might think. Though if they are found chances are humanity will have been long gone and it'll be one of the only records we ever existed.

  11. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Rei · · Score: 2

    Hard to say. Each Voyager spacecraft could pass tens of thousands of stars in the next billion years (Voyager 1 passes its next star after 40k years) - depending on your definition of "pass". And they're pretty radar-reflective.

    Whether they'd ever be recovered depends really on the answer to the Fermi paradox.

    BTW, I'm listening to the record right now... it sure would be fun to be an alien species tasked with decoding it. I doubt they could get far on the voice, but a lot of the nature and machinery sounds probably could be deciphered, with enough work.

    --
    Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
  12. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    While true, it's still far more likely that the record will eventually hit a rock of some form than that it will land in the hands of an intelligent species. Space may be empty, but of what we do know to be out there, a much larger portion of it is some form of rock than is intelligent life.

    You're assuming both possibilities are completely driven by random chance without offering any proof that is the case. We really don't have enough information to even pretend to draw a conclusion regarding those probabilities.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  13. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

    Space is very, very, very empty.

    It's actually filled with a lot of energy.

    --
    Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
  14. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 1

    You're neglecting a third possibility, that the object will decay to the point where the information encoded is no longer recoverable.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  15. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    There is also a video component on the record. Even if the sounds are meaningless to the species that finds it, chances are that they will find the non-random patterns and make the connection to either sound or light.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  16. Perfect Technology by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    Even today, you could make a really good case for using a record. All you really need to make it play is a paper cone and a needle. I bet a rolled up leaf and a thorn would even work. It's not the best way, but it would certainly let somebody know what was coming out of the "amplifier" was non-random, and worthy of attention.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Perfect Technology by Rei · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're talking content for primitives, you better give it a reentry/landing system and aim it at a planet considered likely to have life.

      Oh geez, are we now to become the monolith aliens from 2001? ;)

      --
      Ever since, I've been suspicious of Jesus and very careful around chlorine.
    2. Re:Perfect Technology by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      LOL...Why not? The idea that slimy green things might be undulating around our li'l Voyager is kind of inspiring, isn't it?

      To be honest, though, I wasn't thinking it would have to be primitives. It's just a very direct system...you wouldn't have to figure out what kind of power supply, or have something complicated to make it produce sound. As long as they could read a pictogram, they'd know enough to make noise with it.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  17. The book was better... by MrLogic17 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...than the blog post.

    Released in the 1978, "Murmurs of Earth: The Voyager Interstellar Record" is a great book with most of the record's images and a bunch of cool info. I have a copy - very fun reading.

    (Posted as FYI for those who didn't know)

  18. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by chetanay · · Score: 1

    Download All Kannada New Songs @ www.newkannada.com

  19. Can't listen to it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aw, crap, the needle's broken.

  20. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by green1 · · Score: 1

    That's possible, according to the article that will take over a billion years, which to me sounds like long enough for something else to happen.

  21. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by KingOfBLASH · · Score: 1

    The odds are much higher it'll be captured in orbit around some celestial body.

    Think about it: to become space dust it has to have almost a direct hit on something. To be captured into orbit it only has to pass through a very very large area out the the edge of the (extra) solar system.

  22. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by alvinrod · · Score: 1

    Any alien species capable of recovering it is likely to be pretty advanced unless they're so far outside of our understanding of what constitutes life that we wouldn't recognize them as such. It could well be another 50 years before we as humans achieve the kind of space travel that would allow us to recover such an alien spacecraft of similar design, assuming it passes really close. Another 50 years of advancement in technology seems just about as alien to me. We might even be pretty good at decoding an alien language because we've got so many different ones ourselves.

  23. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 1

    That's possible, according to the article that will take over a billion years, which to me sounds like long enough for something else to happen.

    Which is exactly my point: our intuitions about what "sounds" likely are unreliable because they're based on our experiences, which are all formed on the Earth where stuff is abundant and interacting with other stuff all the time. Our imaginations are simply not attuned to the emptiness of space.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  24. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Not very likely. Space is, to coin a phrase, is big.

    Not really coining this phrase. The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy notes, quite a while ago, that the Universe is, "very big".

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  25. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by guruevi · · Score: 1

    That's assuming they'll find the record in the first place and know it's not just a 'weird lid', then they should also be able to hear and see in very similar wave ranges to us or know how to translate it.

    Us humans barely understand our own technology that's older than a few 100 years, the Antikythera mechanism, Stonehenge, Inca's and Egyptians all had very basic tools and crude calculations compared to ours and we barely understand both what they had to say and what they did with it, most of it still being a mystery.

    Even if V'ger came back to earth after an alien race found it and sent it back, would we even understand the technology we made, if they encode the information in their form DNA or bacterium, would we find it and decode it?

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  26. Re:You know the best part about space? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 2

    No but certain news sites are fear mongering about everything for no reason.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  27. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Bengie · · Score: 1

    The average density of the universe is roughly one atom for every four cubic meters.

    This is why it's too expensive for ISPs to roll out fiber in the USA compared to Japan or Korea.

  28. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see you're still sucking off Timmy daily, you fuckwad.

  29. Re:You know the best part about space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bwaha

  30. Ann Druyan was his fiancee? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What struck me most when reading this is that at the time, Ann Druyan was the author's fiancee and Carl Sagan was married to another woman. Since I don't think Ann Druyan ever married anyone besided Carl Sagan, I have to wonder what transpired. Was there some torrid affair that happened as a result of making this record?

    Or was it just some coincidence years later that they got together again and ended up getting married?

    dom

    1. Re:Ann Druyan was his fiancee? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      At some point he just asked her to marry him out of the blue, over the phone, no acknowledged romance previously, just getting along well as friends on the record.

      Her description is available from googling.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  31. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by wed128 · · Score: 1

    Looks like you dropped this:

    oya

  32. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by green1 · · Score: 1

    our analysis of both our plane, and other planets, indicate that things collide with them all the time, in a billion years it's quite possible that the same fate would befall these probes.
    As for "degrade over time", that degradation tends to happen through hitting small things. Remember, space is empty, if it isn't exposed to anything, what's to cause it to degrade?

  33. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 1

    (1) planets are vastly larger targets than the Voyager spacecraft.
    (2) planets (by definition currently) have powerful gravitational effects in their neighborhood.
    (3) planets in comparatively crowded neighborhoods -- the ecliptic plane in the immediate vicinity of stars, which have *massive* gravitational wells.
    (4) Interstellar space is much, much more sparsely populated (1 atom/m^3) than the solar system.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  34. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by green1 · · Score: 1

    The items impacting planets are often much smaller than the planets themselves, I highly doubt that Voyager is immune to gravitational effects.

  35. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 1

    So you're thinking it will crash into a planet.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  36. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by green1 · · Score: 1

    I'm thinking that hitting ANYTHING is more likely than being captured by an intelligent species, or degrading due to time without any particles impacting it.

  37. This is what Slashdot was once about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stories like this. Wish he SNR here was higher.

  38. Aliens will never see it by dicobalt · · Score: 1

    In 500 or 1000 or whatever years humans will fly out there and bring it back to Earth.

    1. Re:Aliens will never see it by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I vote no. Let it go and build a big tourist trap coasing along a few miles away, like will eventually be done with the moon landing locations.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  39. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    The record is supplied with instructions on the correct rotational speed and means of playing. Any civilisation capable of intercepting it should have no trouble decoding it.

    At which point they will probably classify Earth as 'no intelligent life.'

  40. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The items impacting planets are often much smaller than the planets themselves, I highly doubt that Voyager is immune to gravitational effects.

    Considering the speed it is at now, it is. Only a star is able to capture it.

  41. IHBT, still this CAN NOT stand by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    wed128 feigns knowledge of the historical documents

    disappointing. This used to be a nerd site.

    Still in keeping with the traditions of our people, " No wireless. Less space than a Nomad. Lame. "

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  42. I snort the nose, Lucifer! Banana, banana! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    It looks like the diagram on the cover doesn't specify the direction the record should turn.
    I'm more concerned about what happens if the aliens play the record backwards. They might actually think that we're into that kind of stuff when they come to visit.
    Instructions unclear, caused interstellar war.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I snort the nose, Lucifer! Banana, banana! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the hidden gem amongst the flotsam and jetsam of slashdot postings. Makes it all worth while. I'm reminded of Arthur Dent, for some reason...

      "I seem to be having tremendous difficulty with my lifestyle"

  43. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    If we found it today we wouldn't even use a physical needle but rather laser map it to exceedingly high detail. It would take two seconds for someone to figure out the instructions, especially if the entire planet could see it over the Internet.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  44. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Given crashing into something in many billions of years is nil, you feel the odds of intelligence finding it is also nil, then.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  45. Long lasting DVD by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    From the summary: "Etched in copper, plated with gold, and sealed in aluminum cases, the records are expected to remain intelligible for more than a billion years, making them the longest-lasting objects ever crafted by human hands."

    All while existing in the interstellar cold and radiation of space. Wow. I'd be stoked if they could make a terrestrial, commercial storage medium which could last a fraction as long. We've got too much data for stone tablets.

    1. Re:Long lasting DVD by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      You can BUY optical media based on gold substrates, this is not new tech at all. Try finding a working DVD player in a billion years tho.

  46. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 1

    Well, that's two different propositions, which are two different kettles of fish.

    Astronomers actually have actually estimated the time it would take for the probability of Voyager running into a star to be even: 10^21 years. Note that's 12 orders of magnitude longer than the Golden Record's expected longevity, and 11 orders of magnitude greater than the current age of the universe. Of course that's not really a valid prediction because it assumes things will remain the same. At roughly 4 billion years the Milky Way and Andromeda will coalesce into a single galaxy; however even though the galaxies will "collide" it is highly unlikely any two stars will collide, simply because they're so sparse. Also well before 10^21 years most of the smaller stars in the Milky Way will have been ejected from the galaxy; likewise Voyager may be ejected from the galaxy before then through similar mechanisms.

    So it's fairly safe that the Golden Record is more likely to decay than it is to run into something.

    Now as for the second kettle of fish, it depends on the nature of capabilities of the civilization involved. If an object like Voyager passed through the solar system chances are we given our current capabilities wouldn't notice it. Not unless it passed within few hundred miles of Earth. But a Star Trek tech level civilization would see it before it entered the Solar System because they have magical tech. I actually think it is unlikely that even a much more technologically advanced civilization than us would pay any attention to random interstellar detritus; although the density of interstellar space is low, the volume is enormous so there's way too much random junk out there to worry about.

    So as am upper limit I'd say the chance of the Golden Record being found by an alien civilization is no greater than it running into a star, based on the physical similarity of the events (having to pass very close). The wild card his that there is a lot more room for the unexpected when you're talking about alien civilizations than when your talking cosmic gravity-billiards.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  47. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    You complete me.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  48. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by green1 · · Score: 1

    But you go back to the concept of the record "decaying". Based on what mechanism? What will cause decay that is not any form of particle? (being that you insisted it won't hit any particles)

  49. What if it hits us from behind? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just saying.

  50. Technical garbage by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    A diamond danced along the undulations of a groove, vibrating an attached crystal...

    This is a poor description of how a (piezo-electric) crystal pickup works; and a crystal pickup is inferior to the various sorts of magnetic pickups.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  51. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by hey! · · Score: 1

    If I said it wouldn't hit any particles, I misspoke. It will continully encounter elementary particles and helium nuclei -- in other words "cosmic radiation". It's just unlikely to hit anything that will cause immediate macroscopic damage, not in interstellar space.

    The cosmic ray flux measurable near earth suggests a 1m^2 surface receives about 10,000 cosmic ray particles with energies in the GeV range every second. Three or four times a year a particle with energies in the peta-EV range will pass through it. But it will take a long time for that to create any kind of noticeable change in the artifact.

    But the time that it would take Voyager to run into something *big* enough to cause immediate macro damage in one go is so longer, we're not talking about billions of years, but thousands of billions. Not that it can't happen sooner; it might be happening even as you're reading this but we won't know for another 16 hours. Forever is a long time, and eventually anything that can happen will happen. The question is whether running into macroscopic matter is more likely than cumulative exposure to radiation transients from things like novae.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  52. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    a third possibility, that the object will decay to the point where the information encoded is no longer recoverable.

    At that point the probe should be renamed from "Voyager" to "Comcast".

  53. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    ...if you were to send the largest thing made by humans through the densest part of the Asteroid belt, in all likelihood it would encounter nothing but a few stray atoms...Our mental pictures of space are corrupted by science fiction

    C3PO's risk computations are fake news! No wonder Han told him to STFU.

    In general defense of sci-fi, they tend to hang out where the "interesting stuff" is, not average space. Even my actual desk is not average (typical) space. Voyager just happens to be a proverbial hillbilly.

  54. Expected to Last for a BILLION YEARS! Really?!? by BBF_BBF · · Score: 1
    A Billion years is a LONG LONG time. But then again, I guess there's not much wear on something that's in a near vacuum...

    I can see the spiel that a salesman would have to get me to buy an extended warranty on that....

    "But, you never know if you're going to fly too close to a star, or even a black hole... if that happens, the accidental damage coverage will replace it for a small fee. Remember you have to pay for return shipping though."

  55. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I actually think it is unlikely that even a much more technologically advanced civilization than us would pay any attention to random interstellar detritus [entering system]...there's way too much random junk out there to worry about

    That could change if there's a war or terrorists trying to sneak dangerous things through. Scanning may be expensive, but sometimes worth it. Voyager's high metallicity may stand out in such scans.

  56. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Teancum · · Score: 1

    I think far more likely that descendants of folks currently alive here on the Earth are going to head into space in a couple of centuries and add on some beacon to the probe as some sort of historical monument and a sort of time capsule. This is a famous artifact of mankind that could very likely be treated the way the pyramids are thought of today. Like the Library of Alexandria, it might be protected by some governments but when that government falls it might even be looted and taken as scrap or pulled apart by future archeologists.

    I agree that the odds of it being found by somebody other than mankind is awfully remote. It certainly won't be taken out by a random passing by Klingon cruiser (as was depicted in a Star Trek movie).

  57. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Teancum · · Score: 1

    The instructions on how to decyper the phonograph is also listed on the outside of the spacecraft in a pretty simple symbolic code and some picture diagrams on how to recover the information.

  58. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Teancum · · Score: 1

    Us humans barely understand our own technology that's older than a few 100 years, the Antikythera mechanism, Stonehenge, Inca's and Egyptians all had very basic tools and crude calculations compared to ours and we barely understand both what they had to say and what they did with it, most of it still being a mystery.

    The Antikythera mechanism is pretty well understood and many of the wheels have been mapped to celestial phenomena (like the movement of planets during the times of the ancient Greeks), cultural events (like the Olympics), and even a simple calendar. A really neat feature is a part that predicts the timing of solar eclipses in Europe based upon patterns the Greeks observed in the past.

    Stonehenge is a bit more complicated because the culture who built it didn't leave much in terms of written records or explanations of their rituals, although it is plainly obvious that the observation of equinoxes and solstices were integral parts of its purpose along with perhaps other celestial bodies including the Moon. That isn't even unique to Britain as such solar observatories have been found in other cultures on completely different continents. The Mayan observatories which did the same sort of thing even have some written records that describe their use and oddly follow the patterns of Venus as a major component.

    In contrast crazy stuff like the Cloaca Maxima, something that is as great of a masterpiece of engineering compared to the pyramids and any of the other ancient "wonders of the world", is extremely well documented including instructions that have been preserved that were essentially a maintenance manual. It is very understood as to its purpose, and it is even recorded as to who made it in the first place (not just a culture.... actual names of real people) and why it was made besides the obvious of flushing manure out to sea.

    100k years from now, the English language is still going to be understood by at least scholars and English Wikipedia articles about the Voyager spacecraft and possibly NASA/JPL manuals on its operation may even very likely survive to that time for future archeologists to be able to understand this artifact of humanity. If an alien species (aka something not from the Solar System) finds this spacecraft, they will have those scholars from the Earth to explain it and pull out those JPL manuals to even re-activate the scientific instruments after some repair of the vehicle and replacement of the RTG fuel. It will also be very well preserved in 100k years or even a million years.

    Untapped mysteries of ancient cultures is just a scam made by people trying to sell books.... often about UFOs and other nonsense that is being generous to call pseudo science. While some thoughts about those ancient devices and buildings is conjecture and speculation, there is some sound reasoning as to why it is thought to be identified. I don't buy your premise here.

  59. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mostly harmless."

  60. Re: Most likely they'll encounter interstellar deb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be captured, it needs to be involved in an interaction with two bodies that cause a gravitational boost in the right direction and magnitude to slow it down to orbital speeds. A single body cannot capture another through gravity alone. Either friction is required from fortuitous aerobraking, or you need another body to exchange momentum with. Both options s require some amount of luck, otherwise it would burn up or get a boost into some other escaping trajectory.

  61. Doesn't Matter If The Aliens Can Read It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always thought that it doesn't matter if the aliens can decode the messages found on the record.

    The record, and indeed the entire spacecraft, speaks to an intelligent origin. Some creature actually made it; the spacecraft isn't something that nature made by randomly smashing asteroids together. It isn't some exotic crystal and it isn't the product of some trivial chemical reaction.

    Now consider that an alien race finds Voyager. What will the first thing they do be? After a brief inspection of the ship, they will retrace it's path in an attempt to find where it came from. They might hesitate to contact us, that much is true. However they will want to know who or what created it and the easiest way is to find Voyager's home. Now this assumes that Voyager is found in space, with little or no alterations in course. Which is most likely.

    What if that's not true however? What if Voyager actually hits something big? If that's the case then there is unlikely to be enough left of Voyager to read the record. If Voyager hits any body with a decent atmosphere then it burns up and is lost. If it hits a star or a black hole then it is lost. If it hits a planet (or any large body) without an atmosphere then you are left with confetti-sized pieces.

    What if Voyager hits a very small meteor, that does not destroy the probe but redirects it? What if Voyager enters a gravity well that merely sends it in another direction? This is much more difficult to trace for the aliens but likely not impossible. Then they need as many clues as they can get.

    The aliens will be highly motivated to find us. However what if the aliens have a unique psychology, one that makes them uncurious about us? Well, if that's so, then what is this whole conversation about? They don't want to communicate with us. End of story.

  62. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not very likely.

    Can you think of a more likely outcome? Please, give your suggestions.

    Now gravitation will tend to steer the things to places with more matter, but if you were to send the largest thing made by humans through the densest part of the Asteroid belt, in all likelihood it would encounter nothing but a few stray atoms.

    Logically, the densest part of the Asteroid Belt contains an actual Asteroid, but I suppose you could also claim they constitute a "few stray atoms" as well.

  63. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by toddestan · · Score: 1

    The problem I think parent is alluding to is that the probe is traveling really fast. If it came sailing through our solar system at 17 km/s, we'd have a heck of a time trying to catch up to it. Even more so as I'm pretty sure we'd not realize just how interesting of an object it is until is was already right on top of us not giving a very big window to react. And that's assuming we'd even detect it and realize what it was in the first place.

  64. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by lars_stefan_axelsson · · Score: 1

    This is why it's too expensive for ISPs to roll out fiber in the USA compared to Japan or Korea.

    Nope. Like matter in space, you USians are all clumped together. You don't need to roll out fibre to the middle of nowhere, since no-one lives there.

    You have three times as many people in California as we do here in Sweden (we're roughly the size and shape of CA). And yet we have much better and cheaper fibre than you do. It's got nothing to do with average population density as you have us solidly beat on that measure (Sweden: 24/sq km, CA: 97/sq km...)

    --
    Stefan Axelsson
  65. Re:Most likely they'll encounter interstellar debr by Teancum · · Score: 1

    Something that would make the Voyager spacecraft stand out as something interesting to look at is that the albedo would be incredibly high (it is far brighter for its size & mass due to the refined metal panels and protective gold-plated foil surrounding the key instruments) and the spectrum of light coming from it would look almost unique compared to any other object. It looks manufactured and can be detected as a manufactured object.

    A somewhat similar object is a near-Earth asteroid that has a really high Titanium reflection that many astronomers seem to think is actually a spent 3rd stage engine and rocket core for a Saturn V used in the Apollo missions. It was detected as an asteroid (and cataloged as such) but the spectral analysis shows it to be unlike any other asteroid seen. If space mining ever becomes a thing, I'm sure that will be one of the prime early objects to check out in detail