Slashdot Mirror


Researchers Find Antidepressants Increase Risk of Death (medicalxpress.com)

Artem Tashkinov shares a report from Medical Xpress: Antidepressant medications, most commonly prescribed to reduce depression and anxiety, increase the risk of death, according to new findings by a McMaster-led team of researchers. It's widely known that brain serotonin affects mood, and that most commonly used antidepressant treatment for depression blocks the absorption of serotonin by neurons. It is less widely known, though, that all the major organs of the body -- the heart, kidneys, lungs, liver -- use serotonin from the bloodstream. Antidepressants block the absorption of serotonin in these organs as well, and the researchers warn that antidepressants could increase the risk of death by preventing multiple organs from functioning properly.

Interestingly, the news about antidepressants is not all bad. The researchers found that antidepressants are not harmful for people with cardiovascular diseases such as heart disease and diabetes. This makes sense since these antidepressants have blood-thinning effects that are useful in treating such disorders. Unfortunately, this also means that for most people who are in otherwise good cardiovascular health, antidepressants tend to be harmful.
The study has been published in the journal Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics.

125 comments

  1. Sure by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That may well be and it's good to know this, however it makes little sense lowering your risk of death due to serotonin absorption blockers when you in turn either run a risk of throwing yourself off the next bridge or don't have any fun living anyway.

    1. Re: Sure by crankyspice · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      geek. lawyer.
    2. Re: Sure by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they cause depression to lessen then they do work as anti-depressants

    3. Re: Sure by Kokuyo · · Score: 1

      Well, let's say I was surprised how happy I was with the side-effect of a reduced libido :D.

    4. Re: Sure by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It is quite a relief indeed.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    5. Re: Sure by TheMeuge · · Score: 1

      It's a terrible study, having read the actual paper. Statistical fishing.

    6. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that most people who get prescribed antidepressants are that far gone?

    7. Re:Sure by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is that those antidepressants may well make you throw yourself off a bridge.

      The key problem with antidepressants is that they usually increase your drive and enable you to "act" before they improve your mood. Now ponder: What happens when you give a deeply depressed, suicidal person whose main reason to NOT kill himself is that he didn't even have the drive to do this a motivational boost?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but there's so many other treatments that are more effective and have less negative side effects. Anti-depressants should be your last treatment before electro-shock therapy, but most people use them as their first and only treatment option. The whole anti-depression industry is a huge scam. Stop reading blog articles and marketing, and start reading research studies.

    9. Re: Sure by cyber-vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've tried exercise, yoga, meditation, changing my diet, quitting drinking, CBT and many self-help books. The only thing that alleviates my symptoms effectively is drug therapy. I wouldn't take them if something else worked.

    10. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may well be and it's good to know this, however it makes little sense lowering your risk of death due to serotonin absorption blockers when you in turn either run a risk of throwing yourself off the next bridge

      Another side effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors is suicide.
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sci...

      or don't have any fun living anyway.

      Unless the serotonin reuptake inhibitors cause anhedonia.

    11. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You take your health seriously, you are the outlier. Most others, myself included, won't make healthy changes when a magic pill is recommended by their doctor that gives similar results. It took years for me step away from the pills and change my diet, etc.

    12. Re:Sure by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      [you] don't have any fun living anyway.

      Why do you suppose a group of people on a scale of millions are not "having any fun living"? Isn't the answer to that question the root cause of the problem?

      --
      We'll make great pets
    13. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who has an either/or attitude about health is, almost by definition, not healthy.

    14. Re:Sure by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Only true for some specific classes of them. Others help almost right away.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    15. Re:Sure by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      they usually increase your drive and enable you to "act" before they improve your mood.

      In other words they probably don't improve you mood at all, its going getting up and actually doing something that improves your mode over time.

      Which isn't to say the drugs are not therefore useful in treating depression just that name causes a lot of confusion about how and why they work. Maybe we should call them 'drive-booters' instead.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    16. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried antidepressants once out of desperation. All they did was make it difficult to jerk off -- one of my few sources of pleasure. Nowadays when I'm depressed I just walk it off -- or bike it off. I find exercise a very effective antidepressant. The hard part is getting started.

    17. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Antidepressants benefit the pharma-medical-industrial complex orders of magnitude more than they do anyone they're prescribed for. They're just another Band-aid put on a problem rather than actually solving it. At best they're good for short-term use -- but taking 5HTP, which you can buy over-the-counter for cheap at healthfood stores, will work just as well in the short term.

      The real cure for depression is cognitive therapy, which I otherwise call 'learning to deal with your own shit effectively'. It teaches you a life skill, and it's a 'cure' because once you learn How To Deal WIth Your Own Shit Effectively, you don't need any medication, and at worst you might need to talk to someone once in a while when things get bad. That's the upside for the individual. The downside for the pharma-medical-industrial complex, is they don't keep getting paid forever, while people suffer the side effects of shitty 'medication' that fries their brains, and Cognitive Therapy is expensive for them. Tough shit for them, I say.

      ..oh, and before anyone calls me out for 'not understanding' or 'never having had the problem'? BULLSHIT. At one point in my life I was suicidal, and fell for the Prozac meme. Shit turned me into a goddamned zombie. People I've known longer than when that happened get a weird and frightened look in their eyes when I bring that time up because they say I didn't even sound or act like a human being anymore. Never. Ever. Again.

      At the absolute most, pharmaceutical antidepressants should only be used for the most severe, hard-core, extreme, otherwise intractable cases of clinical depression -- NOT FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE JUST NOT 'HAPPY HAPPY ALL THE TIME' AND CAN'T HANDLE SOME RANDOM SHIT IN THEIR LIVES. Again: cognitive therapy is The Way. Learn to deal with your own shit, and learn that life is not Happy Happy Happy All The Goddamned Time.

      Posted as AC even though I'm logged in because I know damned well I'm going to get modded down to neg one and deluged with angry and hateful comments. People don't like the truth, after all.

    18. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unhappy people want to:

      1. stop feeling unhappy
      2. start feeling happy
      3. stop caring about feeling unhappy

      Point 1: Better than feeling unhappy but not an end in and of itself.
      Point 2: Possession of any chemical able to achieve this will be declared illegal and to have no medical application.
      Point 3: This is the effect of most ssri treatments available.

      People want to be happy, whats offered is a persuit of happyness and a protestant view of 'antidepressants'.

    19. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if they aren't more effective than placebos.

    20. Re:Sure by epine · · Score: 1

      The problem is that those antidepressants may well make you throw yourself off a bridge.

      chmod -R 666 soul
      make -j 666

      Oops, typo! Meant to type "6", but force of habit (and too much Red Bull). Unfortunately, so many processes spawned, didn't see the ledge.

      Arrrrrrrrrrrrr—

    21. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why is it effective?? Maybe it is because YOU think it is?
      That is certainly what most modern studies show when it comes to ssri's, as they are actually less effective than sugar pill.

    22. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as one who takes them i can attest to this first hand

    23. Re: Sure by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Placebos do work, I know it is popular on slashdot to misunderstand the placebo effect and to claim that they're useless, but actually it is a known thing you can look up on the interwebs.

      When somebody says it is a placebo, they said that it works; that much should be obvious! However, if it has side effects, those might not be necessary in order to gain the same benefits. Placebos are the easiest class of medicine to reformulate.

    24. Re:Sure by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      If we use only objective measurements and totally ignore the subjective experience then it is easy to say that you were much improved as a zombie.

      Scary shit, IMO. Great advice with cognitive therapy, because regardless of it is measured to be "effective" it is still useful and doesn't have negative side effects. (when administered correctly, of course) That said, it isn't a "cure" and that is way over-selling it.

    25. Re: Sure by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I've tried exercise, yoga, meditation, changing my diet, quitting drinking, CBT and many self-help books. The only thing that alleviates my symptoms effectively is drug therapy. I wouldn't take them if something else worked.

      CBT? Who was your dom? What was your safe word?

      (CBT stands for Cock and Ball Torture.)

    26. Re: Sure by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Yup, this. Which the chief side effects of antidepressants are depression and suicide, that doesn't mean they didn't do anything, it means they CAUSED those things to occur in higher rates in controlled trials. And when the ads say "GoodVibraxil is believed to work by adding funzones to your whizwhams and blocking your gloffin's ability to access to nega particles", you know it's a fucking sham.

      The way it works now is they inject random shit into volunteers (the homeless, prisoners, etc.) and then if there are any semi-positive effects they invent a disease that corresponds to it. Then they pay for study after study until they got one statistically in their favor, then they run to the FDA with it for the good ol' rubber stamp.

      How many people actually have "restless leg syndrome"? How many blind people have or care about "non-24"?

      Shit's made up, yo.

    27. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my experience with Cymbalta, Wellbutrin, or Zoloft.

    28. Re:Sure by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Sorry dude, but 5HTP is a waste of money - if it would work, it would be sold as medicine, not as a dietary supplement. Real antidepressants work just fine, but it takes time to find the right one because people are different. So you have tried fluoxetine, it didn't work out for you and now all antidepressants must be crap. That is quite a stupid stance and no amount of bold text will make it less stupid. Had you tried something else, you'd just as well might be praising the meds now.
      While the cognitive behavioral therapy is a good thing and works indeed, it is only effective as a sole therapy if the depression is low-grade in first place. Seriously ill people would only benefit from it if they take antidepressants at the same time, otherwise no argument against the automatic thoughts will ever be convincing enough.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    29. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got it all wrong. That's not how (most?) anti-depressants work.

      A good description would be: They dampen overflows of emotions and urges. That means they do not at all hamper your capacity to rationally consider your actions. It's just that instead of being super-scared or super-excited or super-angry about something you would be more towards apprehensive optimistic or annoyed respectively.

      And it's the extreme emotion/urge that makes you throw yourself off a bridge.

    30. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get your mind out of the gutter. It stands for Cognitive Behavior Therapy.

    31. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason you had that effect was that you weren't depressed, you're bipolar.

    32. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have non-24. I'm not blind, either. For something like 12 years my sleep schedule has inexorably moved forward by about two hours a night. I'd have whole weeks where I never saw the sun. About 6 months ago I got some additional medication that massively helped, and I'm able to work a regular 9-5 job for the first time in my life.

      Of course, I'm sure it was all psychosomatic and I just lack willpower or some shit.

    33. Re: Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that. citalopram (Celexa) was by far the most effective for me, but my relationship needs sex in it to be fulfilling and I was experiencing anorgasmia. Screw that noise.

      But man... I could nap again! It was great. These days I'm on mirtazapine and it helps regulate my sleep schedule: I'm out within a few hours. It sure beats hopeless depression that leaves me on the verge of doing something stupid, but sometimes I miss my napping ability. Still, those who say pills don't work are fooling themselves. It's about finding the correct medicine for your needs and *taking it on fucking time*. Screw with dosage timing and it can really fuck with you.

      Captcha: debugged

    34. Re:Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, ye olde "I was misprescribed a particular medicine so it's ALL bad" argument...

      The problem we face as a race is a complete unwillingness to accept that, at the core of things, chemical reactions influence our brains and that balance can be thrown out of whack. It's not up for debate, we've already proven it. The secret to these meds is figuring out the chemistry of a patient's brain and prescribing the correct medicine to help. That's why any psychiatrist worth a fuck is going to work with a psychologist (or is one already) and change medicine if symptoms aren't going in the right direction. Anyone starting CBT and/or medicine needs to be watched by loved ones for a few months until they're on a good track.

      The science isn't exact until we find a way to isolate the exact causes of certain pathology. Telling people to stay away from it altogether is setting (some) people up to suffer. If what you say is verifiable truth, it should be trivial to find reputable and reproducible studies.

  2. Wow... by chaboud · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's... Depressing....

  3. Risk of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    This makes me wonder about the medical qualifications of the article writers:

    "The researchers reviewed studies involving hundreds of thousands of people and found that antidepressant users had a 33% higher chance of death than non-users."

    So, users of antidepressants have a 133% chance of death?

    1. Re:Risk of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't feel bad. Not everyone understands percentages.

    2. Re:Risk of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simplistic explanation... Imagine a graph showing their risk of death in any given year. It probably looks exponential I'd guess. It means their chance of dying in any given year is 33% higher than that graph (the average).

    3. Re:Risk of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That line, that "antidepressant users had a 33% higher chance of death than non-users," makes me wonder if that's because they were originally depressed. Cause / Effect error, anyone?

    4. Re:Risk of death by Calydor · · Score: 2

      Depends on the cause of death, though.

      Threw himself off a bridge? Attribute to depression.
      Organs shut down, autopsy showed severely reduced levels of serotonin to be the cause? Attribute to side effects from anti-depressants.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    5. Re:Risk of death by dunkelfalke · · Score: 2

      It is the other way around. The most common antidepressants are serotonin reuptake inhibitors, so there is too much serotonin in the rest of the body, not too little. This is why a very common side effect of this kind of antidepressants is constant low level diarrhea.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    6. Re:Risk of death by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      No. The statistics I have here in my hand show that dead people are 133% deader than live people. Except for immortals.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:Risk of death by tomhath · · Score: 1

      The actual study seems to be pay walled so I didn't read it. But I wondered the same thing when reading the summary. It doesn't say anything about risk adjustment; for example, what proportion of the people on antidepressants have other significant health issues like cancer or Alzheimer's?

    8. Re:Risk of death by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It might well be a cause/effect error. From the summary it's impossible to know how the control group was selected...presuming it was. And if it wasn't, then it may be saying that depression is likely to lead to death.

      I'm going to presume that there was *some* selection done to the control group, but I really doubt they did a study where some people diagnosed as depressed were randomly given anti-depressants and others not, and otherwise treated identically. So I'm going to doubt that this is a significant study. Quite plausibly those prescribed anti-depressants were more seriously depressed than members of the control group.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    9. Re:Risk of death by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Serotonin levels are only temporarily altered, and they return to the prior balance before the medicine even becomes effective. That is totally debunked as the mechanism. The mechanism is unknown, and that is widely known.

      Please stop repeating zombie pharma industry talking points from the past that died decades ago!

    10. Re:Risk of death by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Risks are usually defined within a length of time. So a 33% higher risk over 1 year, over 5 years, etc.

    11. Re:Risk of death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feel bad. Not everyone understands percentages.

      Don't feel bad. Nobody is immortal.

    12. Re:Risk of death by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      It doesn't say anything about risk adjustment; for example, what proportion of the people on antidepressants have other significant health issues like cancer or Alzheimer's?

      More importantly, from the summary it seems to be comparing the risks for antidepressant users to the risks for the general population. A more apt comparison might be to people diagnosed with depression who DIDN'T take antidepressants.

      The relevant question is: If you're depressed, will you be more likely to die if you take them or if you don't.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  4. This news has made me feel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This news has made me feel really depressed .. oh wait!

  5. Nothing to do with depression by Gabest · · Score: 1

    It's only the drugs.

  6. Risk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the risk of death for humans always 100%? Sooo...

    1. Re:Risk? by Sique · · Score: 1

      Not for a given time period, except the time period is 150 years or longer.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
  7. The drug industry chasing $$... by bogaboga · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Antidepressants block the absorption of serotonin in these organs as well, and the researchers warn that antidepressants could increase the risk of death by preventing multiple organs from functioning properly.

    Is it just me? I find the whole idea of a pill curing depression rather strange. I think what we need is a more just society; a society that focuses less on material possessions or money but more on family -
      whatever that may mean to an individual.

    Let's remember that there are communities on this planet where depression is an unknown, especially the so called third world nations, despite their popluation's daily struggle to survive.

    1. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by gtall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So in your opinion, brain chemistry has nothing to do with mental stability. And if you'd bother to read the literature, anti-depressants do not "cure" depression. The stabilize a person so they aren't functionally incapacitated....when they work. That's the other problem, everybody's body chemistry is different, what works on one does not work on another. And what works this year might not work next year on the same person. People are moving targets due to aging, and their diets also vary from year to year.

      Depression is not a single condition. Pick up the Harvard Guide to Psychiatry, there are myriad disorders, i.e., paranoia, grandiosity, etc. One person usually does not have a single one but is some smorgasbord of different conditions. That makes picking drugs that much harder.

      So go ahead believing a just society will cure depression. Just societies also generate serial killers.

    2. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Enter+the+Shoggoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      Antidepressants block the absorption of serotonin in these organs as well, and the researchers warn that antidepressants could increase the risk of death by preventing multiple organs from functioning properly.

      Is it just me? I find the whole idea of a pill curing depression rather strange. I think what we need is a more just society; a society that focuses less on material possessions or money but more on family -

        whatever that may mean to an individual.

      Let's remember that there are communities on this planet where depression is an unknown, especially the so called third world nations, despite their popluation's daily struggle to survive.

      Yes it is just you! Although it's true that unhappiness can be a byproduct of social ills it is profoundly ignorant of you to confuse this with clinical depression. The former might trigger an epsidoe of the latter but depression, anxiety, bipolar specturm disorders, schizophrenia and other mental disorders have a neurophysiological basis.

      Also, please keep the tired trope about third world nations to yourself as there is no evedince whatsoever to support the conjecture. People in third world nations who suffer mental illness are generally shunned. Those that come to harm generally have their cause of death misattributed,

      --
      Andy Warhol got it right / Everybody gets the limelight
      Andy Warhol got it wrong / Fifteen minutes is too long.
    3. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Let's remember that there are communities on this planet where depression is an unknown, especially the so called third world nations

      Uh buddy, hate to be the one to break it to you. But this was known back in ye olde roman times and earlier. The diagnosis was usually something like "malaise of the soul."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by evilbessie · · Score: 1

      Actually it's not just them, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      The view that a number of these 'mental illnesses' are actually just part of the human condition, not something that is ostensibly wrong, does have some support among some in science and medicine and that we may be medicalising relatively trivial bits of what it is to be human. I would agree there are certainly some serious conditions where therapy and drugs are necessary to manage and control. But as this is specifically about SSRIs used to treat depression it is certainly something which there is limited data showing the efficacy of treatments, often showing similar results to a placebo. That and 50+ years of anti-depressants have actually made the problem worse, vastly more people are now diagnosed with depression and long term usage of drugs is increasing, so some debate as to if they help the majority of users is certainly warranted.

      Meditation has been shown to be at least as effective that almost all anti-depressants. So why should the value of these drugs not be evaluated, especially as increased suicide ideation is a side effect of many anti-depressants.

    5. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I'd guess that most of the time it IS family that is the root cause of a person's depression. Giving him more thereof is probably not going to be the cure.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    6. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The anti-psychiatry movement mostly consists of scientologists.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're reading the literature, then you know the brain chemistry theory of depression is an unproven myth and more and more scientists are moving away from it just like more nutritionists are saying fat is good. People are moving targets because their brains are fighting the damage caused by the pills (the aging serotonin starts breaking down and damages its receptors). If your body is resisting something, changes are you shouldn't be doing it. If you've been taking anti-depressants for longer than two years and have even increased your prescriptions I strongly recommend you start looking into getting off them. Fix your life instead of using pills to pretend you're ok. Don't forget their withdraw systems are depression so if you start weaning off and begin felling depressed that doesn't mean you still have your original depression.

    8. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by geekmux · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depression is not a single condition. Pick up the Harvard Guide to Psychiatry, there are myriad disorders, i.e., paranoia, grandiosity, etc. One person usually does not have a single one but is some smorgasbord of different conditions. That makes picking drugs that much harder.

      So go ahead believing a just society will cure depression. Just societies also generate serial killers.

      Believing the pill-pushing healers is also difficult to swallow due to the one constant that stands out; Greed.

      Greed has infected the Pharma industry, and it wouldn't matter if the pill was as worthless as a placebo; if it generates revenue and comes with the benefit of being able to generate more revenue due to side effects, it's considered a good thing and the answer in our corrupt world of ruthless capitalism.

      With regards to what a just society is capable of generating, Big Pharma is now the largest opium dealer on the planet, with Greed killing tens of thousands of people every year.

    9. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by zifn4b · · Score: 1

      So in your opinion, brain chemistry has nothing to do with mental stability.

      I find that for many people they can alter their "brain chemistry" as you put it by practicing guided meditation and learn to control their thought processes to direct them more purposefully. I assume there is a group that has no ability to do this and their minds are random and chaotic but I don't think that's all of them. The mind appears to not have the structure required to purposefully guide it when you are young and only through diligent practice and training can you attempt to guide it and control it. Sadly, very few people are interested in this and seem to believe that everything external to them is responsible for altering their mental state. That is only true if you want it to be or at least that's why I've found to be the case.

      --
      We'll make great pets
    10. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it just me? I find the whole idea of a pill curing depression rather strange. I think what we need is a more just society; a society that focuses less on material possessions or money but more on family

      Well, the idea of living in a just society where depression is unknown is a worthy goal, but in the meantime . . .

      My brother suffered from depression for decades. He's otherwise smart, talented, capable, and caring, and when he could force himself to work, he did well. But then there were the months when he just couldn't make himself leave his house. He would just sit inside all day petting his dog while the rest of his loving family fretted about him and wondered what we could do.

      Then he found a therapist and an anti-depressant drug regimen that worked for him. He has since moved on from the therapist, but the drug regimen has worked wonders. He has redone the gutters on his house by himself, he gardens, he works hard at his job, and he has lost nearly 100 pounds (on purpose) over the past six months. That might not sound like a lot, but it's such a relief to know that when our parent die, he will be able to care for himself.

      I don't know that the anti-depressants have "cured" his depression, but they certainly allow him to function. He at least has his life back.

    11. Re: The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientologists who practice their own version of talk therapy called "auditing" which they use to control their membership.

    12. Re: The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if those people weren't shunned and instead reproduced normally would the population start having a similar incidence of depression as the not third world??

    13. Re: The drug industry chasing $$... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 2

      Also apparently slashdotters who have never been nor meet anyone who was depressed. Which is incredibly depressing. I didn't realize basic treatment of depression has reached global warming levels of denial outside of scientologists and conservative Christians.

    14. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand depression.

    15. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that serotonin is a dopamine antagonist, and vice-versa? You have more serotonin in your system, you have less dopamine. Dopamine is what makes you feel satisfied with life, and also fuels your adrenal glands and muscle contractions. With less of it, you're more of a inanimate lump. Just try getting exercise while on serotonin reuptake inhibitors; it sucks ass and you can't really ever get yourself going. SSRIs are poison and should be banned.

    16. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, he's slaving away in the corporate-industrial complex for the benefit of our pharmaceutical masters. Well done there. No wonder they came up with those drugs, it was making them lose out on valuable slaves. Sucker.

    17. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      There are people that have intrinsic imbalances in their brain chemistry. The could have just won the lottery and fallen in love with a beautiful, kind woman and adopted a puppy and still be contemplating suicide. Their mental health is compromised and they are clinically depressed no mater what reality should indicate their mood to be. Those people definitely need medication, and medication often lets them function as productive members of society.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    18. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can reply to this post because or prozac. I was on the fast track to suicide before I was placed on that. It's not a cure, but it can get you past the hard spots.

    19. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Sadly, very few people are interested in this and seem to believe that everything external to them is responsible for altering their mental state.

      These are lessons that often can only be understood after they are learned, and so there is no known effective way to teach it other than to motivated students who already do understand part of it.

      It is like asking chimps to start their education earlier so that they might learn to read. How would they learn to value reading enough to focus on the lessons?

    20. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would just sit inside all day petting his dog...

      So that's what they're calling it these days? :)

      But, more seriously, my own armchair theory, is that among other things, the SSRIs can make people motivated and less concerned about the consequences of their actions. So if someone needs a bit more confidence and motivation to get out of the house and get a job then the SSRIs can be helpful.

      But, on the other hand, if a person struggles with feelings that life is pointless and humiliating and generally not worth living - but they hold off on suicide out of concern for the people they care about - then there's a big risk that SSRIs will push them to suicide.

      I actually had a close relative who was a very nice person who was easily overwhelmed by all the crazy bad stuff happening in the world - who ended up killing himself shortly after being prescribed some SSRIs for anxiety relating to a temporary medical condition. So SSRIs aren't for everyone. :)

    21. Re:The drug industry chasing $$... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Let's remember that there are communities on this planet where depression is an unknown,

      Yes, every community that doesn't have a saturation level of psychologists and psychiatrists and a drug store on every corner, with insurance that pays for all kinds of things, has no depression. That's because there is nobody to diagnose it, and nobody to profit from it.

      Until ADHD and ADD and such became the reason why Johnnie and Suzie couldn't read, nobody had ADD or ADHD, either. And now, people who are jittery and nervous have "restless leg syndrome", because there is a drug that treats it.

      despite their popluation's daily struggle to survive.

      In other words, when people don't have a lot of free time to think about why it isn't their fault that their life sucks, they aren't depressed. That's why there is the phrase "first world problems".

  8. Medical Mental Health is Insane!!! by John+Allsup · · Score: 1

    Let's start with something the computer literate ought to understand: Any computational problem at least as hard as solving the Halting Problem is certain to have no general solution. If we restrict to a finite Turing machine of a given size N (e.g. by looping the tape, or having the machine halt-and-reject in the advent of running of tape), any size we choose, the corresponding Halting Problem for that machine cannot be solved on that machine, only a much larger machine.

    Once we reach the point where decision making is affected (i.e. beyond proper sensible drinking), prediction as to the outcome is essentially reduces to a practically limitless family of decision problems each at least as hard as the Halting Problem for the _largest_ finite Turing Machine which can be faithfully implemented in this physical universe (yes, the entire universe, and given all 14 billion years of runtime available to us).

    That is how hard the problem these 'this drug does X' researchers are trying to solve. The only problems they can really solve are those which involve coming up with more and more elaborate ways to delude themselves and those who are gullible enough to believe their pseudoscientific bullshit. Accurate prediction of the 'this medication treats schizoaffective disorder' is so impossible that it is way past the point of insanity, out through Numptyland to the field called Dipshit, before one begins to get to the degree of craziness necessary to think what people who believe this shit do.

    --
    John_Chalisque
    1. Re:Medical Mental Health is Insane!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it could be something like "most users taking this pill feel that their mental state is better (i.e. more positive) than when not taking it", which is every bit as 'scientific' as "most users taking this pill noticed that they could get and keep an errection better than when not taking it".

    2. Re:Medical Mental Health is Insane!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One common mental illness in computer scientists (and engineers) is that they think their field of expertise can be transposed to any other discipline. Unfortunately, there's no pill to get you over the false peak of Mt. Stupid.

    3. Re:Medical Mental Health is Insane!!! by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but even one drink will affect decision making ability, though not as much as two. So will a cup of coffee. Or being hungry. Or being tired.

      I agree that the problem is difficult, but you are oversimplifying. And there are ways of resolving the problem which, though not guaranteed, *do* result in generally correct answers. Of a statistical nature. These involve having a well matched control group. Unfortunately, the summary gives no sign that such a group was well matched, and the nature of the problem makes such a match unlikely. I suspect this is a report of a search through the literature, which while valuable as a clue is not going to be reliable as a result.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  9. So... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 0

    I can be dead and want to live or alive and want to die. Nice choices. Thanks, Obama.

    1. Re:So... by gtall · · Score: 1

      That Obama affects your mental health when he isn't even President any longer is worrying.

    2. Re:So... by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      Well Trump just got here. Should I blame him? Make up your mind, liberal!

    3. Re:So... by enrique556 · · Score: 1

      That Obama affects your mental health when he isn't even President any longer is worrying.

      Agreed, and now he's even causing you to worry. Will his reign of chaos ever cease? Worst. President. Evaaar.

    4. Re:So... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You can't change neither Obama nor Trump.

      You can only change yourself.

      So why not start there?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. Risk of death is now 105% ? by Foske · · Score: 1

    Quite depressing indeed...

  11. Not the study I was looking for by Kiuas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The tittle had me excited because I thought they'd been studying the suicide risk of depressed people on anti-depressants vs. depressed people not on anti-depressants. There have been studies done, such as this one (open access, published in the journal of the Royal Society of Medicine) found that when selective serotonin and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are given to adult healthy volunteers with no signs of a mental disorder, the suicide risk is doubled. Whether this doubling also occurs in depressed individuals is the real question, but this is hard to study ethically.

    Anti-depressants are far more controversial than most people seem to think, and the medical field has slowly begun to admit it. Note that I'm not saying the study I mentioned or this study prove that their usage should be stopped, but at the very least they're clear indicators that more research is needed into their efficacy and potential alternatives.

    --
    "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    1. Re:Not the study I was looking for by ledow · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, antidepressants don't make you happy. They provide almost a removal or suppression of feeling (so you don't feel depressed but you don't feel happy to the same extent - or you find it HARDER to feel those things).

      If you're taking antidepressants then I don't think that the death-risk is particularly significant (sure TWICE THE RISK sounds scary but it's a small percentage anyway). I think the only study to do is: Depressed people NOT on them vs. Depressed people ON them. Which, generally speaking, works out as an improvement in quality of life overall.

      Comparing them to non-depressed people is like saying "People who didn't need heart surgery twice as likely to die when we cut them open than people who do". It's not medically all that useful as you just try not to do that anyway.

    2. Re:Not the study I was looking for by Kiuas · · Score: 1

      Comparing them to non-depressed people is like saying "People who didn't need heart surgery twice as likely to die when we cut them open than people who do". It's not medically all that useful as you just try not to do that anyway.

      Absolutely, I agree with this 100 % which is why I said that more studies need to be done.

      I mean, it's clear that there some depressed people who find anti-depressants very useful. But my understanding based on very cursory reading on the topic as well as some people I know who've been on them is that many don't like the state of mind they put you in precisely because it cuts out not just all the negative emotions, but also the positive ones which would be the ones an individual most likely needs to start experiencing to start making their way out of depression.

      I mean obviously for the people who suffer from severe depression the meds are usually required before therapy can even be started. However, the real question in my opinion is whether or not anti-depressants are needlessly prescribed to individuals discharged from clinical care in a way that actually hampers their recovery and prolongs depression, or even worsens it?

      That's the question I think more and better studies should aim to answer to.

      --
      "It is the business of the future to be dangerous" -Alfred North Whitehead
    3. Re:Not the study I was looking for by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      They do numb all emotions somewhat, but the specific effect on the negative emotions is far greater. Even if they won't actually cure the depression, they still give a much-needed break from it and show the patients that yes, things can actually change for the better.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    4. Re:Not the study I was looking for by RatPh!nk · · Score: 1

      The tittle had me excited because I thought they'd been studying the suicide risk of depressed people on anti-depressants vs. depressed people not on anti-depressants. There have been studies done, such as this one (open access, published in the journal of the Royal Society of Medicine) found that when selective serotonin and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors are given to adult healthy volunteers with no signs of a mental disorder, the suicide risk is doubled. Whether this doubling also occurs in depressed individuals is the real question, but this is hard to study ethically.

      Anti-depressants are far more controversial than most people seem to think, and the medical field has slowly begun to admit it. Note that I'm not saying the study I mentioned or this study prove that their usage should be stopped, but at the very least they're clear indicators that more research is needed into their efficacy and potential alternatives.

      Indeed you are right! Antidepressants are far more controversial than most people seem to think. The reasons some doctors in the medical community are beginning to admit it (embarrassingly after 20+ years) is that the data for their effectiveness is really thin. Essentially, they don't work outside of patients with (maybe) really severe depression, and even in those cases the effect is largely minimal.

      What's worse, like all good/new things once the first bits of data started to show they "helped" (mood in many people is a fluctuating thing, you could argue they would have felt better in a few weeks anyway), the prescriptions started flowing, and it is now hard to reverse the expectations that one of the prior commenters note - pill to cure or treat depression. According to a 2015 study, more than two-thirds (69%) of those prescribed an antidepressant do not actually meet the criteria for the diagnosis of major depressive disorder.

      It also shows the business of medicine - showing "statistically significant" results that may or may not contribute to clinical significance. Here's what I mean. For trials that examined depression that was mild to moderate in severity, the benefit was just 1.29 points on the 53-point Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). The difference for trials that studied severe depression was 2.69 points on the HDRS. Previous researchers suggested/used a 3-point difference which corresponded to “no clinical change”—that is, neither a doctor nor a patient would notice that change. Other researchers showed that at least a 7-point difference was necessary for “minimal improvement.” As you see, many studies don't come close.Then there is publication bias. If you look closely you find that 49% of the total studies had negative results,

      It is a mess. It is a problem. People who are clinically depressed and suffer depression need treatment, and they need effective medications that afford them a clinically significant improvement in their condition, not just statistically. This is true for all branches of medicine - I'm looking at you cardiology and oncology.

      --
      Argh. The laws of science be a harsh mistress.
    5. Re:Not the study I was looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, antidepressants don't make you happy. They provide almost a removal or suppression of feeling

      For people with major depression, the SSRI anti-depressants are rarely prescribed alone. They're almost always given with valium derivatives that make people feel good in the sense of more peaceful and less anxious - and they're often also given along with anti-psychotics that can, among other things, suppress feelings. So it's often hard to tease apart the specific effect of each drug.

      There's also the issue that SSRIs are claimed to sure depression on a time scale of weeks of months when pharmacologically they cross the blood-brain barriers on a time scale of minutes. To the extent that they do cure depression, the opposite of being depressed is feeling happy, motivated and optimistic - that everything will work out fine and nothing is your fault. But, of course, making a person who is suicidal - but stopped by concern for other - more motivated and less concerned about the consequences of the actions can be very dangerous.

    6. Re:Not the study I was looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the medical field has slowly begun to admit it ...after raking in billions of dollars at the expense of people who need actual help. Let's call a spade a spade here: the medical field is more concerned with getting rich than helping those in need.

    7. Re:Not the study I was looking for by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      I'm using an SNRI for ADHD and want to lower the dose, but my psychiatrist has other opinions on that. Because so much keeps changing without me changing the drugs around, I've elected to let him have that battle for the moment. I actually started sleeping well--I started having depression issues out of nowhere, so I took a weak NDRI with a short half-life to get rid of that feeling during the day (it wears off in 3 hours), then would just become lethargic and sleep all night. It was great for a few weeks; then it stopped. Damn.

      When I've been taking only Atomoxetine and I forget for a day, I start feeling awesome. Then I start feeling high as shit. I need this stuff, but maybe in a lower dose--I could feel awesome and be manageable, right? That'd be cool. Right now I can feel pain but not joy; I'm used to it and it doesn't bother me, but I motivate better with the dial turned a touch the other way.

    8. Re:Not the study I was looking for by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You should never make any health decisions based on individual studies, and most importantly never, ever go looking for studies which support a decision you are going to make, because you'll find them.

      I like to say that science isn't about truth, it's about evidence. The difference is there is logically no such thing as conflicting truths, although two different truths may make you feel conflicted. Evidence, on the other hand, contradicts other evidence all the time. It's the normal state of things.

      What you want to do is base decisions on systematic review papers published in high impact journals. The purpose of a systematic review is to review the state of evidence at the current point in time. You may disagree with the author's conclusions, but the evidence should be laid out right there.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    9. Re:Not the study I was looking for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sometimes the anxiety from taking medication is worse than the general anxiety it supposed to help with. Darn over-thinking brain. I can't take SSRIs, Serotonin syndrome. I took 1/2 of the smallest dosage, while not on any other drug of any kind, and got one hell of an adrenaline rush. I had bruises all over me by the end of the day from overly stimulated limb movement and lack of pain. I felt like I could lift a car if I wanted to. Funny thing is it's listed under "allergies" in my medical report, but I guess allergies is something a doctor is going to immediately look at.

    10. Re:Not the study I was looking for by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Then I start feeling high as shit. I need this stuff, but maybe in a lower dose--

      So take less. Unless you're being physically restrained and force-injected with this medication, you can simply take less of it. It is your choice.

      Pharmacies sell pill cutters. The active ingredients are rarely, if ever, concentrated in one place in a pill, they are distributed throughout, so truly, half a pill has half the dose of a full pill.

      It is a bit harder to manage to double your dosage on a prescription med without a doctor's ultimate approval. You can do it until your current allocation of pills is gone, but it if is truly making a difference then your doctor should consider that in setting your dosage later.

    11. Re:Not the study I was looking for by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      You can't cut the pill. Never, ever, ever open an Atomoxetine capsule. The drug is highly-caustic and will burn your hands, mouth, and eyes. You have to get the capsule down to your stomach (full of aggressive, organic-matter-dissolving acids and enzymes) and small intestine (full of aggressive, organic-matter-dissolving lye and enzymes) before it releases the drug.

  12. You Need Electroconvulsive Shock Therapy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few good seizures each day will have you in shape again.

  13. Sure by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Interestingly, the news about antidepressants is not all bad. "

    Sure, after a while the most depressed people are all dead, so there are less depressed people.

  14. Consider the source by tomhath · · Score: 1

    The study was done by a bunch of psychology students.

  15. YOu have a choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Choose your way to die, from a myocardial infarction or from hanging yourself.

  16. my experience with depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was treated for depression for a couple of years with SSRI. The medication works. But I really get out of depression by buying a Bible, and praying, asking God for help, and giving some money to charities and beggars. Now I am treated for schizophrenia which is much better than depression. (Jesus speak tenderly to me.) Good Luck to everybody with sickness or poverty or any suffering.

  17. depression == family by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    That's not to say that finding better families for foster care wouldn't help a lot of kids w/ mental problems. (especially if there's one neglected kid who starts taking it out on the other kids, resulting in all ending up with issues) ...

    But my first thought about this was 'doesn't suicide rate go up for the holidays?' Those are the times we spend with family. Now, maybe it's because people can't afford presents for the kids after getting laid off and they see themselves as a failure (so it's related to the materialism).

    But for others, it's just dealing with family. Is my mom/grandmom/whoever going to pester me about not having a (boy|girl)friend/not liking my (boy|girl)friend/not being married/not having kids/not having a job/not having a good enough job/not being straight/whatever else?

    I'd hang out w/ one of my brothers more ... perhaps some cousins ... maybe see my dad more than once every 5 years or so ... but the rest of the family? I'll pass.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:depression == family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having witnessed what happens when someone from an abusive, if stable household goes into foster care, I cannot think the solution we need as a country is to send more kids into foster care. It's not all peaches and apples.

  18. Once again, association is NOT causation by slipton · · Score: 2

    This study does not seem to account for the fact that people who would take antidepressants might be at higher risk than those that would not. Therefore, this increased risk of death might be in part because they are depressed, not just because of the medication. These kinds of studies must be taken with a large grain of salt. Or a spoonful of sugar. If we are going to publish study results on news outlets, let's please make sure they are thorough and aren't sensationalized!

  19. The cause of this could be by Revek · · Score: 1

    While growing up most people learn, for better or worse to deal with their feelings and how to control the extremes. By changing your brains natural chemistry you will inevitably, in some people introduce a critically destabilizing change that sometimes causes the person to crash. I say this because it happened to me years ago when I worked for a not for profit mental health system. I was proscribed over the years several different types of antidepressants with very little in the way of real therapy. Some caused major mood swings that did nothing for my mental well being. I never caused harm to myself but I personally think these drug need to be more restricted and require more scrutiny by providers. This of course will never happen, until we stop taking money from these programs and increase the number of resources available to them. You don't let someone with cancer go without constant tests to assess the persons condition. In fact ignoring cancer in a child is a punishable offense but you're free to ignore their mental state.

  20. Control group? by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The article doesn't mention a control group.

    Clinical depression is an illness, and like other illnesses, it can cause a lot of physical problems. Could it be that the illness itself is causing the organ malfunctions, rather than the antidepressants?

    Depression also leads to many bad habits, such as substance abuse and other addictions. Could it be that these bad habits are the real cause of the organ failures?

    Antidepressants do have some nasty side effects. We've known that for decades. But this study doesn't prove it. And even if it's right, the risk of death and poor quality of life due to depression is far worse than anything caused by these side effects.

    1. Re: Control group? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely. Depression is greatly misunderstood. It isn't an 'illness' like a cold or cancer. Any drug that actively rewires the brain (and not all of thrm do) is a recipe for disaster. Modern, 'designer', pharmaceuticals are poison. Worse, a lot of the companies and doctors pushing them are perfectly aware of this fact.

    2. Re:Control group? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Longitudinal studies, ones which examine changes of a cohort over time, are conducted under different controls than a double blind which can mitigate variable such as already known conditions such as increased tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs use. I imagine these findings can be helpful for patients primary care providers.

  21. This required 'research'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great Zeus, we have become a stupid species.

  22. this is a surprise to whom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All the ads I see on tv for any anti - depressant always state that a side effect is suicidal thoughts.

    As one who has taken them in the past, I can vouch for this... On many occasions I had to unload and lock away my 9mm weapon in a separate container from my ammunition for said, so that I would not put it into my mouth and pull the trigger.

    And that was while taking these anti-depressants.

    Off of them I am not as happy, true, but on them the thought of ending it all happens regularly.

  23. Bioavailable Serotonin by emil · · Score: 1

    If you would like to naturally increase your bioavailable serotonin, then the short answer is to take tryptophan supplements with niacin.

    When tryptophan passes through the digestive system, it can take one of two pathways, processing into either niacin or serotonin (and then a portion into melotonin after further processing).

    Taking niacin with tryptophan will maximize the serotonin pathway.

    However, use great caution with these supplements in the presence of an SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, i.e. the main ingredient of many anti-depressants) - this combination can be fatal.

    1. Re:Bioavailable Serotonin by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      So basically a diet rich in grass-fed beef! I have know that was the path to happiness for a long time. Good to know the science behind why!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    2. Re:Bioavailable Serotonin by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Too bad that the cause of action is unknown and the hypothesis that the mechanism of action involves changing the serotonin levels are completely debunked.

  24. Psychiatry is medieval by Seven+Spirals · · Score: 2

    About three years ago my wife started hearing voices. It got progressively worse until it was happening 22 hours a day or so. She went through all kinds of hell trying to get help and when she did they put her on a huge panoply of drugs. The drugs never helped. Some did make her into a zombie so she couldn't scream at the voices as much, but they didn't really help her. She'd struggled with depression, anxiety, and other less severe mental illness for about 15 years before the voices. She took SSRI's, Trycyclics, a few novel drugs, and if they ever did anything it was just a negative side effect. After dozens of doctors visits, 20 years of struggle, and trying just about ever treatment under the Sun, drugs have never worked. The only thing that ever showed any promise was when she was doing Cognitive Behavior Therapy. That actually had some incredibly good results, but the problem is that it's real work. For someone who can't concentrate, is clinically disorganized, and simply can't think without being interrupted by voices, CBT is too hard.

    I haven't given up trying to help, but I have given up all hope that any of these doctors have clue about what they are doing. It doesn't help that you normally get super-short appointments with them (10 minutes is a long one). It also doesn't help that it's super-expensive.

    1. Re:Psychiatry is medieval by laurencetux · · Score: 1

      DBT is very interesting and a lot of folks that deal with the public might want to at least read part of a good book on same.

      if you look long enough you might find the books by "Marsha M. Linehan" laying around

  25. Paxil is the Devil by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

    Paxil made me completely apathetic, with a diminished sexual interest, and lack of appetite among other symptoms. I'd rather be depressed and have periodic "black moods".

    Limited usage of THC works wonders in comparison - with none of the anti-depressant symptoms.

    1. Re:Paxil is the Devil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Saffron supplements. Just started and it is working great for depression and other things that prozac is usually good for. We'll see over time. YMMV

    2. Re:Paxil is the Devil by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I hear prozac is also good for making you fall out of love.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  26. A:B comparison by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

    Risk of death from anti-depressants: Up a few percent over your entire lifespan

    Risk of death from suicide: 100% the second you do it

    I hope this BS doesn't discourage people struggling with depression from seeking help... If it does, those deaths are squarely on the people that ran this study.

    --
    If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
  27. Like antidepressant - criminal psychopathy link by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    What happens when you give a deeply depressed, suicidal person whose main reason to NOT kill himself is that he didn't even have the drive to do this a motivational boost?

    This reminds me of the sampling-error false link between antidepressants and criminal behavior, and the ethical dilemma some psychologists have when treating psychopaths.

    Some psychopaths (just like some non-psychopaths) also happen to be clinically depressed. (It's apparently like being color-blind vs. being diabetic. No particular link, so there's all four binary combos.)

    A depressed psychopath may be quite willing to commit atrocities but mostly doesn't because he's too downed to get up the energy to do it. (He may have committed a few already and be in prison, which might also add a bit of situational depression to the mix.)

    So what do you get if you treat the depression? A fully-functional, energetic, psychopath, all set to go on the rampage he's been too downed-out to get around to.

    Thus do you get sampling bias making it appear that a good antidepressant has increased criminal behavior as a side-effect. (Actually it just produces more active behavior in general - and the psychopahths do more of their usual thing.)

    And thus the ethical dilemma for a shrink treating one: Does he leave the depression untreated and the patient suffering? Or does he treat the depression and produce an active, energetic psychopath who is a serious danger to everyone around him?

    Psychopathy itself is essentially untreatable. About the only "treatment" that has been shown to be substantially effective (by the measure of drastically reducing recidivism) is to teach them Objectivism - a philosophy that provides convincing and accessible answers to "Why should I be good? What's in it for me?"

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  28. Only have to lose once... by arthurh3535 · · Score: 1

    Depression is a battle that you only have to lose once. Just having depression can mean fighting thoughts of stepping out in front of a train or wondering if that knife would be sharp enough to cut your wrists before it hurts to stop.

    --
    No! It's a *SIG*. Keep the Special Interest Groups away! (Con joke!)
  29. Nutritional causes of brain issues by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 1

    Remember, the brain is mostly fat. Some inspiration of what may be possible: https://nutritionandmetabolism...
    "We report the unexpected resolution of longstanding schizophrenic symptoms after starting a low-carbohydrate, ketogenic diet. After a review of the literature, possible reasons for this include the metabolic consequences from the elimination of gluten from the diet, and the modulation of the disease of schizophrenia at the cellular level."

    And:
    https://www.drfuhrman.com/lear...
    "Depression doesnâ(TM)t have one specific cause; environmental and genetic factors may be at play, as well as psychosocial stressors, however, a major factor causing depression is unhealthy dietary factors. Fast-food and commercial baked goods are linked to depression in a dose dependent manner, and dietary excellence can be the solution for many suffering individuals. A feeling of a depressed mood can also be a symptom of other medical conditions or a side effect from a medication, so to be sure of what is causing your symptoms, you may need to discuss your depression with your doctor."

    Search also on "The UltraMind Solution: The Simple Way to Defeat Depression, Overcome Anxiety, and Sharpen Your Mind" by Dr.Mark Hyman, again focusing on nutrition.

    Water-only fasting helps in some cases of mental illness too (especially if brain inflammation is caused by some food allergy). The Russians did a lot of research and practice on that.

    Obviously, good mood is more complex than just nutrition. Look at Dr. Andrew Weil for a broader perspective.

    Or see this quoting Philip Hickey, Ph.D:
    http://www.eqi.org/p1/depressi... Is Not An Illness: It is an Adaptive Mechanism
    "In order to feel good, the following eight factors must be present in our lives.
    * good nutrition
    * fresh air
    * sunshine (in moderation)
    * physical activity
    * purposeful activity with regular experiences of success
    * good relationships
    * adequate and regular sleep
    * ability to avoid destructive social entanglements, while remaining receptive to positive encounters"

    Also, check out:"The Upward Spiral: Using Neuroscience to Reverse the Course of Depression, One Small Change at a Time Paperback" by Alex Korb PhD.

    There are lots more resources like that. There are lots of alternatives to placebo-like mental drugs...

    Our society is also all too quick to label a "spiritual crisis" as mental illness:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    So, when all else fails,consider: "Dark Nights of the Soul: A Guide to Finding Your Way Through Life's Ordeals" by Thomas Moore for finding meaning and even personal growth in the darkness (might be of some help to you too as it is a difficult journey you are on together).

    Good luck to you and your wife!

    --
    A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.