China Arms Upgraded Tianhe-2A Hybrid Supercomputer (nextplatform.com)
New submitter kipperstem77 shares an excerpt from a report via The Next Platform: The National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) has, according to James Lin, vice director for the Center of High Performance Computing (HPC) at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, who divulged the plans last year, is building one of the three pre-exascale machines [that China is currently investing in], in this case a kicker to the Tianhe-1A CPU-GPU hybrid that was deployed in 2010 and that put China on the HPC map. This exascale system will be installed at the National Supercomputer Center in Tianjin, not the one in Guangzhou, according to Lin. This machine is expected to use ARM processors, and we think it will very likely use Matrix2000 DSP accelerators, too, but this has not been confirmed. The second pre-exascale machine will be an upgrade to the TaihuLight system using a future Shenwei processor, but it will be installed at the National Supercomputing Center in Jinan. And the third pre-exascale machine being funded by China is being architected in conjunction with AMD, with licensed server processor technology, and which everyone now thinks is going to be based on Epyc processors and possibly with Radeon Instinct GPU coprocessors. The Next Platform has a slide embedded in its report "showing the comparison between Tianhe-2, which was the fastest supercomputer in the world for two years, and Tianhe-2A, which will be vying for the top spot when the next list comes out." Every part of this system shows improvements.
why else name it NUDT?
Their supercomputer is no match for our wall!
For a second I thought, OMG they're arming (as in giving weapons) to their supercomputers! I had no idea that Chinese A.I. was so advanced, maybe Elon Musk (and Putin?) are right! (Elon Musk is afraid of the Roboapocalypse and Putin said whoever controls A.I. will control the world).
Anyway, does anyone have an idea how well these systems perform with the native (home grown in China) processors? Are they using the ARM chips as a backup plan or have they even given up on their own efforts? (doubtful). By the way, is China still restricted from access to U.S. Supercomputer technology (seems hardly worth it now) and perhaps that category should be extended to include A.I.?
Finally, does the fact that everyone(?) seems to have settled on this sort of large exa-scale clusters of Von-Neumann processors mean that the debate over which architecture is completely over? A long long time ago, there were some efforts I remember to more closely couple memory and CPU, like in Thinking Machines systems. Are those efforts dead? Is it due to the difficulty in writing software for fundamentally different execution sequences/memory sharing?
1st thought: What, missiles? Drones?
2nd thought: Actual arms on the computer.
3rd thought: Dammit, got me.
His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
"The National University of Defense Technology (NUDT) has, according to James Lin, vice director for the Center of High Performance Computing (HPC) at Shanghai Jiao Tong University, who divulged the plans last year, is building one of the three pre-exascale machines [that China is currently investing in], in this case a kicker to the Tianhe-1A CPU-GPU hybrid that was deployed in 2010 and that put China on the HPC map."
Wow. That "sentence."
won't be able to make any sense out of what supreme crackpot is doing. a for effort, but we're gonna need something a lot bigger and a lot smarter. or a lot more nuclear.
They will finally be able to run Vista!
What else could be the reason.
Tianhe means WOPR in chinese
Tianhe-2 apparently drew 17.6 megawatts.
How much more does Tianhe-2A draw, and what's the largest portion of the cluster they can run simultaneously without causing blackouts in the surrounding area?
A SMALL aluminium smelter can consumer over 500MW..
Really, 17.6MW is nothing on any industrial scale..
Hell, the Chinese have 9MW electric locomotive tractors, which they use in tandem..
Now, if it was 1.21GW, and involved a flux capacitor... then we would be talking!
So they 'ARM'ed them. The didn't arm them? Just correcting an editorial error. K Thx Bai.