Slashdot Mirror


Nobel Prize In Chemistry Shared By 3 For Cryo-Electron Microscopy (www.cbc.ca)

Dave Knott writes: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded on Wednesday to researchers who developed cryo-electron microscopy, which is described as a way to create detailed images of the molecules that drive life -- a technology that allows scientists to visualize molecular processes they had never previously seen. This is decisive for both the basic understanding of life's chemistry and for the development of pharmaceuticals. From the Nobel committee's press release: "Electron microscopes were long believed to only be suitable for imaging dead matter, because the powerful electron beam destroys biological material. But in 1990, Richard Henderson succeeded in using an electron microscope to generate a three-dimensional image of a protein at atomic resolution. This breakthrough proved the technology's potential. Joachim Frank made the technology generally applicable. Between 1975 and 1986 he developed an image processing method in which the electron microscope's fuzzy two-dimensional images are analyzed and merged to reveal a sharp three-dimensional structure. Jacques Dubochet added water to electron microscopy. Liquid water evaporates in the electron microscope's vacuum, which makes the biomolecules collapse. In the early 1980s, Dubochet succeeded in vitrifying water -- he cooled water so rapidly that it solidified in its liquid form around a biological sample, allowing the biomolecules to retain their natural shape even in a vacuum. Following these discoveries, the electron microscope's every nut and bolt have been optimized. The desired atomic resolution was reached in 2013, and researchers can now routinely produce three-dimensional structures of biomolecules."

27 comments

  1. Big deal by 110010001000 · · Score: 0

    Who is going to win the Peace Prize this year? I'm voting for BeauHD.

    1. Re:Big deal by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      Who is going to win the Peace Prize this year? I'm voting for BeauHD

      Whoever wins the Nobel Peace Prize this year, I can guarantee that it won't be the one guy you think should win the Nobel Peace Prize. Anyway, he's busy tossing store-brand paper towels to people who've been through a hurricane and couldn't make it to the ceremony.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize for stuff they thought he'd do in the future. By that logic, anyone can win it.

    3. Re: Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoever uses that 3rd guy's water vitrification tech on one of those shitposting nerds down there with the multiple copy pasted paragraphs that should trigger an automatic ban so we can slice 'em up into a couple dozen bags of couch potato chips.

    4. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is going to win the Peace Prize this year? I'm voting for BeauHD.

      Three choices :

      Trump just for not being Obama.
      Netanyahu for the oppression of the Palestinian people.
      Rocket Man for defying the US of A and its petty president.

    5. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll probably award it to Daesh.

    6. Re: Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kim John Un is the best candidate. At least he's not responsible for terrorism in Europe, millions displaced or murdered, wars in Libya, Surya, Ukraine etc. Unlike certain bitching n1gger.

  2. Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I have seen images like this before. I always assumed they were just mathematically constructed models, not actual images of these molecules (even if there is some images processing). Pretty cool stuff.

    1. Re: Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They are mathematical models based on many thousands of 2D grainy images. So there is signal averaging and a process called tomography to reconstruct the 3D model.

      Every model of a protein you have ever seen is in many respects a mathematical model. Maths is used extensively.

  3. Are they metallic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the biomolecules are not metallic then the electron microscopy is not properly adequate for it.

    1. Re: Are they metallic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Turns out there is a lot you don't know about EM

  4. Wow by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 2

    Somehow I missed knowing that we could do this. It is amazingly cool, and is absolutely a Nobel level advance.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  5. Changing chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freezing water, even instantly, changes the chemistry. This work is no doubt fundamental, but far from complete.
      I applaud this work, and based on what we *knew* before is it is certainly worthy of worldwide recognition, however we still have a long way to go before we truly understand, let alone control it.
      If anyone does ever truly understand it, only God(TM, patent pending) could save the rest of us.

    1. Re: Changing chemistry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The conformation (shape) of proteins determined by this method correspond to the conformation of the same protein as determined by other methods. At least in these cases freezing the sample doesn't seem to effect its shape, at least at the resolution this method can see.

  6. Following the Wiley prize, also this year by EMN13 · · Score: 1

    Related: http://newsroom.wiley.com/pres...

    It's not quite clear why there are different people for both pizes, though.

    Background: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  7. Does this mean cryogenics theoretically posible? by helga+the+viking · · Score: 2

    Presumably this means cells don't get damaged when frozen using his method? One less barrier so people could be frozen and re-animated! ;-) "Dubochet succeeded in vitrifying water -- he cooled water so rapidly that it solidified in its liquid form around a biological sample, allowing the biomolecules to retain their natural shape even in a vacuum"

  8. Re: Does this mean cryogenics theoretically posibl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Method isn't used on cells. It's used on purified biomolecules like proteins and nuclei acids.

  9. Re: Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This dude is Russian

  10. cryo electron microscopy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am guessing this will help to analyse gases which have been super cooled to a liquid state, superfluids?