Slashdot Mirror


After Bankrupting Gawker, Peter Thiel Demands a Chance to Buy Them (buzzfeed.com)

An anonymous reader quotes BuzzFeed: In a federal bankruptcy court filing on Wednesday, lawyers for venture capitalist Peter Thiel objected to the ongoing sale process of Gawker.com, arguing that the billionaire has been unfairly excluded from bidding for the assets of the defunct news website... Whoever ends up buying the site will also buy its archives, which are still up, and will have the right to do with them what they want, including delete them. In the filing, Thiel's lawyers allege that he was prevented from receiving information in regard to a potential bid for Gawker.com by plan administrator William Holden and his counsel, Gregg Galardi, following a Wall Street Journal story in October that said Holden and Galardi had started to market the website to potential buyers...

The Wall Street Journal reported that Holden has been exploring the sale of Gawker.com since July, and that he recently marketed the site's potential legal claims against Thiel as part of its appeal. The marketing of those claims is at the center of Thiel's complaint, in which his lawyers argue that Holden should not be able to conduct a sale of those claims and ask that the court drop a motion that allows for discovery to move forward. Thiel's representatives also said that they contacted those administrating the sale of Gawker.com last month "to express Mr. Thiel's interest in participating in the sale process," but that they had been rebuffed and then ignored.

Thiel's complaint calls him the "most able and logical purchaser."

149 comments

  1. Gawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    At it all.

    Republicans are pervs.

    1. Re:Gawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Except your perv POTUS is promoting child molesters now actively. Nobody say IVANKA.

    2. Re:Gawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      You're high on pizza parlor sex with children fantasies again, GOP. Bend over and let Roy Moore bugger you for massive corporate tax cuts you nutless little bitch pedo-publicans.

      MAGA = Mueller Aint Goin Away

    3. Re:Gawk by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Did they serve pizza on the Lolita Express when Bill flew on it 26 times?

    4. Re: Gawk by sg_oneill · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Ah yes the magical pizza parlour that used some sort of magic to hide children in an evil sec dungeon that does not exist on this plane of reality (literally, there is no basement). Damn you normies for not believing that the darataddly reptilians are phase shifting inter dimensional rape dungeons into pizza shops.maaaaaaaaaaa I said I ate my meds

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    5. Re:Gawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's video, we could find out.

    6. Re:Gawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, youve been fed a pack of lies. Num Num Num hows it feel to be a sheeple.

    7. Re:Gawk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU LOST. GET OVER IT.

  2. Delete Them? by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

    I seriously doubt Thiel wants to delete the archives proving one of the original fake news agencies made nearly everything up.

  3. The Goldman Sachs strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bankrupt Bank of America by tricking them with a nasty trap deal, while leaving them with all the blame, then buy them up.
    Except that Goldman Sachs' Lloyd Blankfein, and his old employee and now bailout manager, overseeing the whole thing, met to discuss what how to handle the thing, so they didn't have to beg and bitch like a little baby, Mr. Thiel!

    Bribery is for troglodytes and lobbying politicians is for n00bs. Real pros simply ARE the politicians. #include <revolving_door.gif>

  4. Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The seller can refuse sale to Thiel, There is no law that says he can't be excluded, as much as he would like to try and invent it. If I think a buyer is a complete scumbag, I am well within my rights to not take their offer. I would sell to another party, just to piss them off.

    1. Re:Seller's choice by Fencepost · · Score: 5, Informative

      The argument to be made to a bankruptcy judge will likely be that if Thiel is willing to pay more than anyone else then it should be sold to him so that money can be used to settle Gawker's outstanding debts. Barring him from the bidding may reduce the amount paid and thus harm the creditors.

      I do find myself wondering every time I see him mentioned whether Thiel actually has any redeeming qualities at all.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    2. Re:Seller's choice by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      I've never seen Thiel and David Miscavige in the same room. Just putting that out there.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    3. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are videos of you blowing both of them at different times, however.

    4. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and he would probably get to pay less tax by offsetting the 'loss' of buying Gawker.

    5. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wonder if his lawyer is Helena Kobrin?

      Scientology successfully sued Cult Awareness Network to death, then bought up the trademark, the website, the mailing lists, and the email contacts. If you call Cult Awareness Network, you're talking to a trained Scientologist, ready to take your money, plant you in front of an e-meter, hypnotize you, convince you that your body and bad thoughts are made of reborn galactic citizens called Thetans, and suck you dry of money and time.

    6. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you call Cult Awareness Network, you're talking to a trained Scientologist, ready to take your money, plant you in front of an e-meter, hypnotize you, convince you that your body and bad thoughts are made of reborn galactic citizens called Thetans, and suck you dry of money and time.

      Anyone dumb enough to do that deserves all of that and more.

    7. Re:Seller's choice by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Actually, under US bankruptcy law the survival of the company as a complete entity is more important than the satisfactory conclusion of all the debts. Although the ability to repay the debts is important the ability of the company to survive and continue to employ people in the future is equally weighted.

      What you argue would result in liquidation in almost every bankruptcy case and liquidation is actually the last result after every other option has been exhausted.

    8. Re:Seller's choice by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      They victimize the psychatrically disabled.

    9. Re:Seller's choice by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Thiel should sell Nick Denton into slavery with David Miscavige.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    10. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The non-Gawker sites were already sold to Univision during the bankruptcy. They paid $135M, which covered the judgement. There is nothing left of Gawker other than its domain name, trademark, and the old content.

    11. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I do find myself wondering every time I see him mentioned whether Thiel actually has any redeeming qualities at all.
      Reply to This

      Gawker published somebody's sex tape against their will, and when a judge ordered them to take it down, they refused and published an article bragging about ignoring the judge. Without Thiel, the victim was unable to afford the legal costs necessary to get them to stop. Thanks to Thiel, the victim got justice.

    12. Re:Seller's choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I do find myself wondering every time I see him mentioned whether Thiel actually has any redeeming qualities at all."

      Mortality.

  5. Hulk crush puny Gawker by rmdingler · · Score: 3, Funny
    Say what you will.

    Thiel may be easy to dislike, but he beat Gawker like a rented mule.

    --
    Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

    Ernest Hemingway

    1. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by rmdingler · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Thiel's a bigot-faggot and you're his personal cheerleader. You should ask him out.

      Ask him out? Dumbass. How do you think I got to be his personal cheerleader?

      --
      Happiness in intelligent people is the rarest thing I know.

      Ernest Hemingway

    2. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      Say what you will.

      Thiel may be easy to dislike, but he beat Gawker like a rented mule.

      You must be from the 'Burgh.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by Wuhao · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'd phrase it more like, Thiel paid for people to sue them for their repeated wrong-doings, until one day Gawker finally said "WHAT, YOU THINK YOU CAN HURT US? YOU CAN'T HURT US IF WE KILL OURSELVES FIRST" and then they proceeded to publicly antagonize the judge, violate court orders, knowingly misrepresent their finances to the court and testify under oath that they'd publish child porn. And that's just the highlight reel.

    4. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never been to Moscow, I don't know how these secret gay Republican compromat traitor things work.

    5. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Depends on the money that buys it. With the right connections, they can buy dirt Gawker dirt cheap, and then use their already bought judges, to flip the case and voilà top investment and Thiel meets the vicousness old money, which is why he likely wants buy.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      One could say Thiel also:

      Smoked them like a bad cigar.
      Scratched their back with a hacksaw.
      Their face was shaved with a rusty razor.
      Gawker doesn't know whether to cry or wind their watches.

      At any rate, when it comes to Gawker, one could say Elvis has left the building.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    7. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      One could say Thiel also:

      Smoked them like a bad cigar. Scratched their back with a hacksaw. Their face was shaved with a rusty razor. Gawker doesn't know whether to cry or wind their watches.

      At any rate, when it comes to Gawker, one could say Elvis has left the building.

      Buy Thiel a drink, and get his dog one too!

      Anyhow, let us now give thanks to Toronto for gifting us Kessel.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    8. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thiel may be easy to dislike, but he beat Gawker like a rented mule.

      And that's a good thing because ... ?

    9. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Ahem, that is 2 time Stanley Cup winner Phil Kessel.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Ahem, that is 2 time Stanley Cup winner Phil Kessel.

      Buy Kessel as many hotdogs as he wants.

      This is fun - I suspect most Slashdotters have no idea what the heck we're talking about.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:Hulk crush puny Gawker by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I am just surprised that Caps fans have not wasted all their mod points downvoting us.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  6. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Silly plebe. Free speech is only for the rich and powerful. How dare you use free speech to report their misdeeds.

  7. Contempt of court has consequences by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1
    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  8. Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0, Troll

    are currently up on gawker.com itself. Don't let Thiel delete them, make copies.

    Gawker didn't slander Thiel by outing him -- the news was true. His revenge campaign is petty and should be thwarted by all means available.

    1. Re: Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he mainly wants to buy Gawker so that it never exists ever again. Who wants those archived articles, keep em forever.

      Good riddance.

    2. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about those articles? The world is better off without them and the outing was only one of many.

    3. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change the robots.txt and its all gone. I have seen it done many times.

      My question is why anyone would go near them. They are a raging dumpster fire of stupid yellow journalism.

      the news was true
      Maybe he wanted his life to be private? Maybe defying a judge while the hulk thing was in litigation was a bad idea?

      This was also not the only time they did that shit. https://theintercept.com/2015/...

      They are slezoids who create controversy then report on it. Remember gamergate? Yeah the ones who were fucking journalist to get good reviews. Gee who were they fucking to get those reviews.

      I have for the past year watched what is left of their empire continue on as if nothing happened. They learned nothing. https://www.buzzfeed.com/kenbe...

    4. Re: Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HA HA. You think archive.org isnt shit.

      Thats just retarded.

    5. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

      His revenge campaign is petty and should be thwarted by all means available.

      Why? It's an honest question. Gawker wasn't bankrupted because they simply reported the news. Gawker was bankrupted because they had a lot of shady dealings and ultimately got snagged by it in the court of law.

      I am honestly asking why should this person be prohibited from purchasing the company? If your argument is based on morality then perhaps you should reexamine the situation.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    6. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the counter party in a lawsuit is allowed to buy the company they suit during bankruptcy, then this is going to become a standard business tactic.

      just suit a company until bankruptcy then buy cheap.

    7. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it often happens in business disputes between rivals in a given industry. One company does something illegal, like violate patents. Company B sues Company A and wins. Company A declares bankruptcy, and Company B buys a bunch of their assets that might be useful.

    8. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You chinky chinaman? You write like chinky chinaman.

    9. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      I am honestly asking why should this person be prohibited from purchasing the company? If your argument is based on morality then perhaps you should reexamine the situation.

      They likely believe he shouldn't be able to buy them because Thiel isn't left wing therefor can't keep that same level of muckracking that they'd been doing for years. It was only a matter of time before Gawker managed to commit suduko anyway.

      The writing was already on the wall for that, the entire buy-up by univision was funny though, especially when all the reporters who say they're bloggers, then claim they're reporters when convenient started quitting because univision required actual ethical standards out of them. And now in this whole situation univision is trying to sell off chunks of what they bought from Gawker because they're money losers.

      With the current state of the ad market, and adpocolypse 2.0 now on the horizon? If Thiel is offering money, they'd better get in a head of this ad crash. If you didn't hear anything on it, even more companies are pulling ads from youtube, google, adwords, and other associated stuff. Why? Because their ads were appearing next to the apparent pedofarming videos that were targeted at children. See the elsagate stuff if you really want to know, fair warning, it's massively fucked up. Or you can watch/listen this vid from mundanematt bout 12mins long.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Whibla · · Score: 1

      ...suduko...

      I'm not sure if this was a deliberate error or not.

      Just in case, I think the word you were looking for is 'seppuku'.

    11. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "committing sudoku" is a frequent joke in online communities similar to repeating a word already included in an acronym (similar to HIV-Virus)

      not that AC btw.

    12. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Mashiki · · Score: 1
      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    13. Re:Gawker is on archive.org and old posts... by Whibla · · Score: 1

      I live and learn.

      Thanks!

  9. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Gawker has not done anything to harm you whatsoever therefor you are a non-factor in this discussion.

  10. Gawker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gawker isn't only bad journalism, it has always been intentionally controversial and damaging to not only the fools who read Gawker (and their many other blog news sites), but damaging to society.

    1. Re:Gawker by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      "Society" as a concept is vastly overrated if it needs censorship to preserve it.

    2. Re: Gawker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. If the government arbitrarily shuts them down, i.e. censorship.

      However this is a case of tort law, where it is a private individual. And not even a corporation masked as a private individual. So it is not censorship.

    3. Re:Gawker by Altrag · · Score: 1

      By what metric? "Freedom" as we currently know it is only a couple hundred years old. There are many civilizations that have survived that long all the way up and down the spectrum, mostly on the end of less free. And a few that have lasted 1000+.

      The US is already looking a little frail as people continually trade off their freedoms for short-term profit (not even their own short-term profit in a lot of cases) or the illusion of security against threats that are flashy but have a tiny probability of occurring while ignoring threats that are much more dangerous but don't happen to make good headlines.

      I'm not expecting the end of the US any time soon of course, but when comparing against some of the ancient empires (Roman empire especially,) the US is still practically a baby.

      Of course I'm interchanging the term "civilization" and "society." If your definition of "society" is something along the lines of "whatever I happen to prefer" or worse "the one I grew up in therefore best," then of course my arguments will be a bit meaningless.

  11. It will just keep popping up... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

    Under different domain names, just like a certain site beginning in goat... :)

    Or is that "pooping up."

  12. All well and proper by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is merely an excellent way to acquire new businesses. If the math is there, and you want it, Bankrupt the business first, then buy it. My free market senses are tingling with the new business model. What is more, it is approved in the Holy Bible - reference Uriah the Hittite, killed by King David, who was already yencing Uriah's wife, knocked her up, and after having Uriah out of the way, married her. So all is good.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:All well and proper by Bigbutt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not news actually. Back in 89 I was working for a computer company that made flip-up cases for PCs. The owner was looking for funding an a lawyer came along and said he'd line it up. The owner made purchases based on the agreement but the lawyer bailed on it leaving the owner holding the bag and the business going under. The owner was rumored to have bailed after finding out this is what the lawyer did; offer funding, bail on it, then swoop in and buy the assets after the business goes bust. We lost our last 6 weeks of pay trying to stick it out.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    2. Re:All well and proper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that this stuff still goes on really bothers me.

    3. Re:All well and proper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mouthpiece did what ? And noone put a bullet in his belly ? Without private vengeance no wonder the law doesn't work !

    4. Re:All well and proper by Solandri · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The anger directed at Thiel over the Gawker case is reminiscent of the anger about the DNC's hacked emails. Those who are angry completely overlook that if Gawker/the DNC hadn't done anything wrong, there wouldn't have been any fallout in the first place. Gawker never would've been sued for publishing Bollea's sex tape. There would've been no evidence of the Democratic party leadership tampering with the primary process. They don't want to hear the message, so they do their best to ignore it and try to shoot the messenger.

      If Thiel had bought judges to engineer some grave miscarriage of justice, I'd have some sympathy for Gawker. But the fundamental truth is most people don't think the right to a free press includes the right to publicize a sex tape recorded without consent. Literally everyone can see themselves somehow winding up in Bollea's (Hulk Hogan's) situation, and they do not want anyone, even the press, to have the right to publicize that tape without their consent. That, plain and simple, is why Gawker lost in a jury trial. That's what bankrupted them, not Thiel helping pay for the lawsuit.

      If you don't want to be bankrupted, don't do stupid, illegal, or ethically questionable things which could bankrupt you. This above all: to thine own self be true. Follow that rule and the only thing you have to worry about is being framed. I think Wikileaks is biased and disagree with its MO, but that doesn't mean I automatically side with the people whose stupid, illegal, or ethically questionable secrets Wikileaks reveals. On the contrary I usually think those people are despicable for doing those stupid, illegal, or ethically questionable things.

    5. Re:All well and proper by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      The movie version was called Pacific Heights.

    6. Re:All well and proper by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0

      The hilarity is that all the people screaming about gamergate, the alt-right, neonazis, and trying to cast gawker as a martyr for freedom of the press are the exact same people who lost their shit over the fappening. They're perfectly alright with publishing stolen sex tapes and nudes... as long as it's not of an attractive woman.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    7. Re:All well and proper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawkers problem was living in the SJW universe, where publicizing sex tapes/nude pictures without consent is abhorrent if it's a female celeb, but so newsworthy they'll defend it to their death when it's a male celeb. Their passionate readers loved this stance, but in court they ran into the problem that in the legal system, it's still wrong if the subject has no victim points.

    8. Re:All well and proper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as long as it's not of a Democrat.

      FTFY.

    9. Re:All well and proper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " If the math is there, and you want it, Bankrupt the business first, then buy it."

      Well, this explains why the video game industry is such a mess. They keep buying the devs BEFORE bankrupting them.

    10. Re:All well and proper by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      The anger directed at Thiel over the Gawker case is reminiscent of the anger about the DNC's hacked emails. Those who are angry completely overlook that if Gawker/the DNC hadn't done anything wrong, there wouldn't have been any fallout in the first place. Gawker never would've been sued for publishing Bollea's sex tape. There would've been no evidence of the Democratic party leadership tampering with the primary process. They don't want to hear the message, so they do their best to ignore it and try to shoot the messenger.

      I hear your message - maybe not the one you intended. You do know that both parties were hacked don't you? You do know that the Republican Party actively tries to ensure that only the "right" Republicans are representing. Google "war on moderate Republicans". Both parties pull this crap. Are you pleased that only the DNC hack has been made public?

      My statement has not Republican or Democrat content, there are many different color crayons in the box. I have no dog in this fight, merely point out a financially savvy path to prosperity.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    11. Re:All well and proper by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 0

      The hilarity is that all the people screaming about gamergate, the alt-right, neonazis, and trying to cast gawker as a martyr for freedom of the press are the exact same people who lost their shit over the fappening. They're perfectly alright with publishing stolen sex tapes and nudes... as long as it's not of an attractive woman.

      Talk about a thread hijack. Trying to figure out how my pointing out the financial advantages of bankrupting a business, then buying it at firesale price is somehow related to GamerGate , NeoNazis, or whatever the fuck the fappening is. What's next, Dogs and cats living together?

      Hell, that vicegrip process is roughly how I bought my house. Took a downturn in the local economy, and a house that had been sitting a while for sale. The owners had built a new house, and were in a bit of financial trouble with two mortgages. I let them sweat it out, as every month without being sold, it got a little worse for them. Finally they got desperate, and I got the place for 50 K under market value. Only difference is I didn't personally drive them to the edge of bankruptcy, I merely played the game to my financial advantage.

      Y'all can get back to bitching about Hellery's emails and O'Blama's birth certificate and whatever the fuck the fappening is. now.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    12. Re:All well and proper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called "fraud" and has been illegal longer than there has been a United States.

      It's also called "stupid" - no one should take on an unpayable debt based off the suggestion that someone else *might* do something to help.

    13. Re:All well and proper by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      " If the math is there, and you want it, Bankrupt the business first, then buy it."

      Well, this explains why the video game industry is such a mess. They keep buying the devs BEFORE bankrupting them.

      Just a modification of the American credo of "Buy High, Sell Low!"

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    14. Re:All well and proper by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 0

      It's not a hijack in the slightest, this is directly on the subject of people condemning what's happened to gawker as if it were some kind of tragic martyrdom of the last bastion of the free press.

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  13. Maybe... by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

    maybe the outings were a good thing -- it showed the world that celebrities, CEOs, engineers, anyone could be gay and successful. If anything, they contributed a lot to acceptance.

    1. Re: Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only, that was not their goal.

    2. Re:Maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just admit being a leftie makes your dick hard.

  14. Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by mi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gawker didn't slander Thiel

    You are not wrong here. Indeed, Thiel never accused Gawker of slandering anybody.

    by outing him

    WTF? Thiel was openly gay years before Gawker first heard of him... Get your alternative facts closer to reality.

    the news was true.

    "Revenge porn" is nearly always true as well — the videos and photos are unaltered. Is it Ok to do it? How about "doxing"?

    His revenge campaign is petty and should be thwarted by all means available.

    His revenge campaign is complete — he caused the assholes to run into the ground. He just wants to piss at their crash-site. To "thwart" him, you have to offer the Gawker's creditors a deal better than Thiel is offering. Pony up the cash, or shut up.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re: Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No buyer is entitled to the purchase.

    2. Re:Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit he was openly gay.

    3. Re: Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by mi · · Score: 4, Informative

      No buyer is entitled to the purchase.

      Yes, usually it is up to the sellers to decide. But Gawker aren't the sellers any more — they are bankrupt and owned by their creditors, represented by the bankruptcy judge. It is the judge's duty to liquidate the property in a manner most profitable to the creditors. Hence my statement: whoever wants to thwart Thiel, has to offer more money.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re: Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The owner is bankrupt and thus, not entitled to the propery either.

      So what was you point?

    5. Re: Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes no sense. Everyone will just leave and set up shop under a different banner... He can't stop the same people from doing the same thing elsewhere.

    6. Re: Hating on Thiel and alternative facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woooosh!

  15. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're probably the kind of asshole who thinks inciting riots, slander, libel, and threatening those you disagree with is free speech. As Gawker found out, it isn't.

  16. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember when you said marrying underage girls was about getting the most for your retirement dollar?

    That was weird.

  17. Re: Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hold this L.

    Now go back to fucking yourself.

  18. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey creimy-dumpty, is the supposedly honey bee one of the bees from your stupid uncle story?

  19. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There you are spamming amazon affiliate links through youtube with yet another fake account, you revenue stream hogging disgusting fat sexist tube of lard, Christopher Dale Reimer!

    You can be sure I will be watching this fake account too. I know this is you because you told me you were working on your freepass 11 file server and you are so dumb that you can't even masquerade yourself properly.

    Now, I told you I was out of meds last week and you didn't even care to contact me you lazy fucker.

    How many times do I have to express the emergency of the situation??????

    The python click script you wrote for my pheromone revenue stream web site suddenly stopped to work!!!!!!

    You fucking incompetent python script writer!!!

    When it works, I get 4000+ clicks a day on my pheromone revenue stream web site but only 5 or 6 without it!!!!

    Now, it seems like you dont care and that you have abandoned me you heartless fucking pig!

    Bonus:
    Here is a story that creimer told me when convincing me what a hard life he had:

    The tree was him and the tree knot was his butt hole!

    So, his uncle packed his fat ass with lard and with his cock! Not that it makes much of a difference but anyway, there it is!

    Signed:
    The girl that used to love you and now hates you, burn in hell where you belong you sexist pig!

  20. Re:Peter Thiel is just another Republican faggot by niftydude · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I keep forgetting that it's OK for progressives to still hate gays as long as they are Republican.

    I need a scorecard to keep track of this ideology cause it's getting too complicated for me.

    --
    You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
  21. Re: Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Butt fuckers, those who take it into butts, and child molesters also don't harm anyone. Don't mind their propaganda in media, it's freedom of expression to molest and to be a slimy pervert.

  22. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    delete my ~12,000 comments from the last 20 years.

    It wouldn't change anything since you keep re-posting the same shit over and over again you dumb fuck.

  23. Re:Peter Thiel is just another Republican faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nah, you just need to stop pretending you understand what's going on. Like, completely.

    It's not "being gay is magical armor" it's "treat gays like human beings for fuck sake (which many republicans still have issues with)" which means they can do bad things and be hated on.

    You mistook something earlier in your logic, and it's messed you all up. It's ok, just use that thing in your head and you'll be able to follow things again.

  24. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Five bucks is all you can spare, champ. Instead of posting things you regret, why don't you clean up, shape up, and grow up?

  25. Re: Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your opinion. My opinion cancels yours out.

  26. Ahahaha. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an African shithole the USA has become since Nixon.

  27. He didn't care so much about getting outed by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    Gawker reported on a bunch of his shadier business dealings. Gawker actually did a lot of real journalism and used the tabloid stuff to pay for it. Muck racking is a pretty vital part of a Democracy and we just lost one of the biggest rakes.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:He didn't care so much about getting outed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are probably the kind of faggit going "Trump Russia" any time the issue of 33'000 emails comes up. Hillary and Podesta broke the law, and got outed for it by the Wikileaks.
      How is Gawker different from Wikileaks? Why aren't we investigating Gawker?

    2. Re: He didn't care so much about getting outed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? There isn't a shred of fact in anything you just said. :(

    3. Re:He didn't care so much about getting outed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gawker reported on a bunch of his shadier business dealings. Gawker actually did a lot of real journalism and used the tabloid stuff to pay for it.

      When he first came to power, Adolf Hitler implemented a number of laws and policies that most people on the left would probably approve of - actions which gave his people hope after one of the worst depressions in human history, and which certainly improved the quality of life for many people for several years.

      As leader of the Soviet Union, Joseph Stalin approved research that would ultimately save the lives of millions of Soviet citizens (such as the development of the T-34 tank, based upon lessons learned in Kalkin Gol).

      Should we then consider these two to be good people, with the benefits of the good they did offsetting the evil?

      No.

      The same reasoning applies to Gawker: the occasional or incidental good they did is vastly outweighted by the wrongs.

  28. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Wait... being gay is a 'misdeed'? Man, and here I thought Peter Thiel did nothing wrong, other than be the wrong sort of gay (right-leaning).

    See now what the weaponizing of political correctness by the left for a generation has lead to... using your own weapons against you.

  29. He's not intending to bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He wants access to information on Gawker he says he needs to make a bid, and claims the administrator is withholding.

    He's not entitled to squat, he's just trying to get access to details on the writers and journalists, their salaries, addresses, employee records etc. He's using the sale of Gawker as an excuse to try to obtain those by way of nuisance lawsuit to block the asset sale.

    One final piece of Thiel shit.

    He really is just a piece of shit that nobody will miss.

    1. Re:He's not intending to bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you do nothing but speculate about a person and their motives, finding them to be "a piece of shit", remember that it was you that made those thoughts and invented that character.

    2. Re:He's not intending to bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a challenge: Prove the AC wrong...

    3. Re:He's not intending to bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why, yes, prove a negative using no information.
      Hell, prove ANYTHING using no information.

    4. Re:He's not intending to bid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thiel isn't a piece of shit, it isn't even human, it's a zombie needing blood from young people to survive.

      It's not human, got it?

  30. Re:Peter Thiel is just another Republican faggot by niftydude · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not "being gay is magical armor" it's "treat gays like human beings for fuck sake (which many republicans still have issues with)" which means they can do bad things and be hated on.

    If that was the case, then you wouldn't have the word "faggot" in your comment subject. The second a homosexual does something that doesn't fit into your ethical framework, people like the AC op call him a "faggot" and a "traitor".

    You can't use a historically bigoted insult, then just claim you are treating Thiel like a regular human being that has done a bad thing.

    --
    You can never know everything, and part of what you do know will always be wrong. Perhaps even the most important part.
  31. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have days where we wish you'd disappear too.

  32. News for nerds, stuff that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Buzzfeed reposts?

  33. Wants to buy Gawker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps I can also interest you in a tire fire

  34. Microsoft had it down to a science by raymorris · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft perfected that process back in the day. They'd make a great offer for a company's technology. Microsoft would agree to buy X units, at a price very profitable to the company, after they made a few improvements or integrations with Microsoft's other software. Of course, the target company wasn't allowed to sell to anyone else during that period. In the fine print Microsoft would get right of first refusal if the company was ever sold.

    The company would work to make the improvements and integrations Microsoft asked for, unable to take any other customers during that time. When it came time for Microsoft to accept delivery, they'd sit on it for a month and not reply. Then they'd decline delivery, asking for more changes. When that run-around finally ended they'd eventually have to accept delivery, so then they sit in making the payment. Sometimes the contract might call for a late fee, which doesn't matter when they aren't paying anyway. A year after the contract was signed, without being allowed to sell to any other customers and having not been paid by Microsoft, the company would go under. The owners might well be behind on their mortgage at this point. That's when Microsoft would offer to buy the company for a pittance. They did the same dance over and over again.

    1. Re:Microsoft had it down to a science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't that where you organize some sort of venture capitalist knowing that they only need to sustain your company long enough to either get paid by MS or sue them and get their money back + returns?

    2. Re:Microsoft had it down to a science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasnt there a Purchase order with set deadlines, delivery schedules and payment terms?
      If MS didnt pay, why not go to court againts them?

      I dont understand how they would let it go.

    3. Re:Microsoft had it down to a science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parallel in the paint world:

      Customer goes into Home Depot and orders three gallons of paint in a particular color. The attendant starts mixing the colors into the gallons and tells the customer to come back in 10 minutes - the actual purchase is only made after the paint is mixed. The customer leaves the store and doesn't come back. Several months later Home Depot auctions off a bunch of coloured paints they've stored up for various reasons (dye didn't mix well, customers changed their mind, etc), the original customer shows up and buys the specific cans he had requested at 1/8th the cost.

  35. Re:Peter Thiel is just another Republican faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are talking about marriage, then non married people are do not have the same rights as nominal citizens either. And there are a lot more of them than gay people.

  36. Free speech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Yesterday the Hon. Pamela A.M. Campbell, a circuit court judge in Pinellas County, Fla., issued an order compelling Gawker to remove from the internet a video of Hulk Hogan fucking his friend's ex-wife, as well as a 1,400-word narrative of the video written by former Gawker editor A.J. Daulerio and 466 user-submitted comments. Here is why we are refusing to comply.....It requires us to remove the video as well as "the written narrative describing activities occurring during he private sexual encounter, including: (a) all descriptions of visual images and sounds captured on the Sex Tape or any other video of this private sexual encounter, and (b) all direct quotations of words spoken during this private sexual encounter and recorded on the Sex Tape or any other video of this private sexual encounter."

    The judge was well outside of the constitution there. Terry Gene Bollea (Hulk Hogan) is not entitled to silence reports of his infidelity with his friends wife. Either she or Hogan himself filmed it, and he has profitted from its release.

    1. Re:Free speech by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      You can't ignore a court order because you think it's unconstitutional. And this was a sex tape, not the Pentagon Papers

      Also Gawker's sister site Jezebel angrily denounced people for refusing to remove Lawrenceâ(TM)s naked photos.

      http://libertyviral.com/this-o...

      Anyhow the judge's order was later declared unconstitutional. That didn't stop Hogan from sueing them and bankrupting them. And now Gawker is Thiel's bitch. They pissed him off by outing him as hay while he was on a business trip to Saudi Arabia.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  37. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just delete your account, it's free, and we'd all appreciate it. Go away, Chris. No one wants you here, no one takes you seriously, no one every says "I wonder what creimer would do".
    You're a joke. You're a living caricature.

  38. Gawker didn't make the revenge porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gawker didn't make the revenge porn, they only reported it. If it was even revenge porn, it was filmed by the participants in it, and released by one or other of them, presumably to pump their careers.

    Thiel just saw an opportunity to take a professional actor (Hogan) and put him in court to do some acting.

    Thiel did that in revenge against Gawker mentioning in passing his (open) homosexuality.

    Gawker reported only the truth, nothing but the truth, so help them god.

  39. This is what an oligarchy looks like., by Cyberpunk+Reality · · Score: 1, Troll

    Billionaire whining that he can't buy the critics he used his wealth to destroy in the first place. One of the more despicable things I've seen in my life. (And there's been a lot of competition for that lately.)

    --
    Rule 35 of the internet: "If it can be hacked, it will be". - Charles Stross
    1. Re:This is what an oligarchy looks like., by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Billionaires wanting to destroy critics? Look no further than Media Matters. In a 49-page document marked PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL, the entire anti-Trump plan is laid out. Called "DEMOCRACY MATTERS, Strategic Plan For Action", it lists four leftist partner organizations: Media Matters, American Bridge 21st Century, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Shareblue. These are some of the most well-funded, well-entrenched, and well known leftist organizations in America. Billionaire George Soros is a key backer. Despicable, you say?

      https://mediaequalizer.com/jef...

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:This is what an oligarchy looks like., by Xyrus · · Score: 0

      Pedobear approves of your message.

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:This is what an oligarchy looks like., by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Billionaires wanting to destroy critics? Look no further than Media Matters. In a 49-page document marked PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL, the entire anti-Trump plan is laid out. Called "DEMOCRACY MATTERS, Strategic Plan For Action", it lists four leftist partner organizations: Media Matters, American Bridge 21st Century, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Shareblue. These are some of the most well-funded, well-entrenched, and well known leftist organizations in America. Billionaire George Soros is a key backer. Despicable, you say?

      https://mediaequalizer.com/jef...

      Maybe they just don't like paedophiles?

  40. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're definitely the kind of asshole who doesn't understand the laws of physics. Speech has no physical power to do anything.

  41. Re:Peter Thiel is just another Republican faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe gay person vs faggot is like black person vs. nig_er.

    And today while trolling I learned that Slashdot doesn't like racial slurs but gay slurs are just fine.

  42. Re: Haha by lucm · · Score: 1

    I agree with the other guy. Gawker was garbage. And I'd bet a dollar that if they had released tapes of Bill Clinton fondling a secretary against her will you would be the first in line to call Gawker evil.

    --
    lucm, indeed.
  43. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bullshit! But if you aren't a troll and really believe in the crap you are saying, why are you writing here then?

  44. Re:Peter Thiel is just another Republican faggot by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    If that was the case, then you wouldn't have the word "faggot" in your comment subject.

    Well, one of the ACs anyway.

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  45. Re: Haha by sg_oneill · · Score: 2

    No being gay is not a misdeed. Being gay while funneling millions into anti gay groups however makes you a cunt

    --
    Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  46. guarantee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can't guarantee that there won't be any more repurcussions from his funding of the Bolea lawsuit against Gawker unless he buys Gawker. So the real question is, how much can the bankruptcy administrators increase the price to fuck Peter Theil one last time?

    1. Re:guarantee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can't guarantee that there won't be any more repurcussions from his funding of the Bolea lawsuit against Gawker unless he buys Gawker. So the real question is, how much can the bankruptcy administrators increase the price to fuck Peter Theil one last time?

      Darn, misspelled his name: its Thiel, not Theil. (rhymes with steal)

  47. Kill this faggot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an arrogant cocksucker.

  48. Because once you delete something off the internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's gone forever, right? /s

  49. Re:Underage sweet thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I paypal you five bucks to fuck off forever?

  50. Re:Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I feel like it. You gotta problem with that?

    Don't be a dick. Speech can't do anything. A person has to act, voluntarily, and regardless of you might think (if you are capable of that), each person is responsible for their actions, regardless of their claimed motivation. So basically, fuck you! You're just another blame passer, like all the rest who are too lazy and scared to look into the mirror and see the real cause of all their misfortunes.