Slashdot Mirror


Google Seeks To Defuse Row With Russia Over Website Rankings (reuters.com)

An anonymous reader shares a report: Google does not change its search algorithm to re-rank individual websites, it said in a letter to Russia's communications watchdog, after Moscow expressed concerns the search engine might discriminate against Russian media. The Roskomnadzor watchdog said earlier this month it would seek clarification from Google over whether it intentionally placed articles from Russian news websites Sputnik and Russia Today lower in search results. Responding to a question about Sputnik articles at a conference earlier in November, Alphabet Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt said Google was working to give less prominence to "those kinds of websites" as opposed to delisting them.

71 comments

  1. More Russian evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm soooo glad Google is standing up to Russia!

  2. RUSSIA BAD...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But we want your money and data please......

  3. Re: GNAA GAY NIGGERS ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    10 out of 10 read. Well said, would read again. I like especially the fact that you have a cohesive point and stick to the facts.

  4. The law of unintended consequences. by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Moscow expressed concerns the search engine might discriminate against Russian media.

    This should be filed under the "things to consider before you inject yourself into US politics" department.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says who? You might want to take what your media feeds you with a grain of salt.

    2. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's difficult to avoid conflicts of interest when there's... well... conflicts of interest.

      I guess everybody did notice that Google don't use their famous original motto "Do no evil" anymore.

    3. Re: The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rank Google at the same level as Monsanto.

    4. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This should be filed under the "things to consider before you inject yourself into US politics" department.

      Good advice for Google as well. If these Silicon Valley companies weren't so completely myopic in their Valley Values group-think they might have some influence in Washington today. It's not really surprising that Comcast wins at every turn; the telecoms — unlike Google, Facebook, etc. — don't go out of their way to alienate the majority party.

    5. Re: The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're too kind. At least I'm not yet forced into Monsanto bondage..not yet at least.

      Google; CNN; DNC - all the same breed of Commi paedos.

    6. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google should downlist American media too, because they also "inject themselves into US politics". In fact, even some private citizens have been caught expressing opinions on politics, and attempting to sway the votes of their friends and neighbors. Google needs to put a stop to that. We can't just have people going around saying whatever they want. Thank God that we have the corporate elite to protect us and tell us what to think.

    7. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by drago177 · · Score: 1

      Google should downlist American media too, because they also "inject themselves into US politics". In fact, even some private citizens have been caught expressing opinions on politics, and attempting to sway the votes of their friends and neighbors. Google needs to put a stop to that. We can't just have people going around saying whatever they want. Thank God that we have the corporate elite to protect us and tell us what to think.

      Ya! And Russia is best at curtailing freedom of speech (well, technically in top 20%), so Google should actually increase the rank of their state-sponsored views!
      https://freedomhouse.org/repor...
      https://freedomhouse.org/repor...
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
      https://www.theguardian.com/wo...

    8. Re: The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I rank Google at the same level as Monsanto.

      We should be so lucky.

      Monsanto isn't sitting on billions of dollars of cash made by strip-mining your privacy....

    9. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by ilguido · · Score: 1

      Google should downlist American media too, because they also "inject themselves into US politics".

      But Google already did that!!!! Alternet, Counterpunch, Democracy Now and many other independent media outlet were heavily downlisted.

    10. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Google should downlist American media too, because they also "inject themselves into US politics"

      Bugger off with your straw man arguments. Russia is a hostile country waging an aggressive information war against the west with an army of internet trolls and fake news intended to spread FUD. It is financing right-wing groups in Europe, an invasion of eastern Ukraine to prevent it from joining the EU and NATO and is just generally causing trouble all over the world. Protecting a dictator who used chemical weapons against his own people, providing separatists with an anti-aircraft missile launcher that was used to down a civilian airplane over Ukraine, all the while always denying all involvement. Meanwhile in the interior the country is cracking down an all independent media.

      Russia is a rogue actor these days.

    11. Re: The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cough cough. Roy Moore. "You can grab them when they're 14."

    12. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Just be careful you're not on the wrong side, my friend.

      You should be aware of propaganda from all sides. Especially those who are the most powerful in media.

      Use scientific principles and the methods of logic and reasoning. None of what you say can be confirmed using that. It is okay to not have an opinion before proof has been presented. I don't judge before I have proof, but I tend to sympathize with those who are the most quiet. I do feel very much alone with thinking like that, as everyone else seems to be okay with justice being bastardized to mean vengeance.

      It's okay to have a simplified view of the world, as it can be pretty tough to thoroughly investigate every story from the news and even the journalists have given up doing that. It is however irresponsible to spread that simplified view of the world as the truth, because we all know that reality is not that simple.

      If you were accused of sexually harrassing someone, would you not want people to be interested in learning all the details from both yours and the accusers point of view, before judging you?

    13. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > In fact, even some private citizens have been caught expressing opinions on politics, and attempting to sway the votes of their friends and neighbors.

      Really you're barking up the wrong tree. Russia did not publicly take a stand and announce their opinion & how we should listen to it. Which is how you portray this verbal neighbor. Russia was clandestine. A more accurate comparison would be if this neighbor placed candidate signs in his friends' yards when they weren't looking, or at least put them realllllly close but not on the property. Therefore influencing passers by, along with other shifty techniques like slapping bumper stickers on their cars too. That is what Russia did.

      +1 for creative sarcasm though.

    14. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by pots · · Score: 1

      "Injecting themselves in American politics" was not the reason given for downlisting the Russian media, that was just the parent's tongue-in-cheek description. Google's actual reason probably has more to do with deceiving the public, and yes there is certainly American media which also qualifies there.

    15. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Russia is a hostile country waging an aggressive information war against the west with an army of Internet trolls and fake news intended to spread FUD...

      The saddest part of it all is America as a country is Putin by and large got everything he wanted. Even if Trump is not directly serving Putin, which I'm anything but certain about. He could easily be being blackmailed. Still, even if that is not happening, the United States as a country is largely doing nothing. The very heart of our democracy is attacked and we do nothing. What is worse is our president actively lies about everything, though the worst is his attacks on the fourth estate. Freedom of the legitimate press is at the heart of our democracy, but instead of legitimate news propaganda and crap is promoted.

      Russia's propaganda is a horrible problem, but America's propaganda is also a horrible problem, particularly now that our president actively supports and creates it.

      Blocking Russia is better than nothing, but hardly sufficient. I'd like to have social networking sights automatically pend fact checks from legitimate sources. There might be some up/down voting thing as well.

    16. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Uberbah · · Score: 0

      Swiftboating bullshit. All of it.

      Russia is a hostile country waging an aggressive information war against the west with an army of internet trolls

      You have just as much evidence for that assertion as the Chem Trailing whackjobs do that the government is putting mind-control gas into jet fuel. There was one person who was corrupt AF in swinging an election last year, and her name wasn't Putin or Trump.

      It is financing right-wing groups in Europe

      It's the CIA and the State Department funding literal Neo-Nazis in Ukraine - you guys meet at Starbucks over coffee?

      an invasion of eastern Ukraine

      Three years of whining about a Russian invasion, not a single photo from a U.S. drone or spy satellite. Just pictures from your Neo-Nazi pals on social media. But even if Russia did invade Ukraine - it would be a million times more justified than any American intervention you can name, as the U.S. overthrew the democratically elected government of Ukraine.

      Protecting a dictator who used chemical weapons against his own people

      You're fantastically stupid if you think Assad was stupid enough to use chemical weapons the day weapons inspectors arrived in the country. After he started winning the war, as opposed to when your ISIS and Al Queda pals were taking over territory. And then again when the war is nearly won, but just after Trump has backed off regime change.

      Russia is a rogue actor these days.

      You are proof that Jesus died in vain, at least for Americans. Because there's just no hope for you.

    17. Re:The law of unintended consequences. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Level of brainwashing and indoctrination in western public becomes frightening. We heard lots of noise about "Russia did this, Russia did that" and still see no proof. Yet everyone believes this bullshit. This is typical goebbels-style propaganda. Frightening part of it is that it becomes more and more similar to nazi propaganda from 1930s and now even Jews are admitting that in this regard Russians are Jews of 21 century. America is literally becoming nazi state initiating one aggression after another across the world and american public is conditioned to even worse atrocities, with possible war against Russia and China. In my worst dreams I wouldn't expect such dumbness and indoctrination across supposedly civilized american population. Now I understand how one of the most civilized societies of 1920s, namely Germany, was turned into bunch of crazy nazis in short 7 years in 1930s. United States is now undergoing the very same process with its public being pitted against Russians with exactly the same nazi methods. Will America end like Nazi Germany ? I hope not - both countries have thousands of nuclear bombs. But if America - like nazi Germany - will try, effect will be at more devastating than in 1940s - this time for the whole planet. And it will be America's fault. Collective dumbness of United States citizens will be to blame. In 1945 saying "good nazi is dead nazi" was common across Central Europe. Would you like to see "good yankee is dead yankee" become popular across the world ? If not, then stop craving for another war.

  5. Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But if you buy really stupid ads on Facebook then it's COLD WAR MODE v2.0!

    1. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Noishkel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny how net neutrality is in the news while at the same time Google is using it's own corporate influence to block other nation's access to the free flow of information. Which is exactly why I don't give a damn about it. It's nothing but different media corporations bitching over who gets the best access to the people they want to advertise shit to.

    2. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny how net neutrality is in the news while at the same time Google is using it's own corporate influence to block other nation's access to the free flow of information.

      Congratulations on winning the "I don't know what net neutrality is" award!

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Downgrading a sites Google web rank is not stopping the free flow of information. Google and Facebook are scared shitless that the US government is going to place their services under FCC oversight and regulations. The major corporations monopolizing, segmenting, and monetizing every byte transiting across the internet have abused their power and deserve a hearty slap upside their collective heads. Had Facebook been under FCC oversight all the Russian sourced political ads would have Facebook liable for millions of dollars of fines and other sanctions. FCC regulations requires every political ad broadcast by radio or TV needs to be sourced and added to the advertisement. FCC regulations require exhaustive scrutiny when ever a media corporation tries to purchase a competitor and move themselves into a market monopoly position. FCC regulations also cover levels of service regulations to prevent any one area from being excluded the broadcast services. FCC regulations also include protections and remedies for slander or any other defamation charges. There are FCC regulations that provide privacy protections and remedies. Of course FCC regulations are certainly not perfect or exhaustive but it does provide a way to hold large media corporations accountable for their behavior and practices. As it stands right now the top 5 largest US internet service providers operate outside of anyone's control and the money the use to buy off their pet politicians has so far kept them from any regulations what so ever.

    4. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh, they know. It's argumentum ad obfuscatum. Why bother to make valid points when you can simply muddy the water?

    5. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Congratulations on winning the "I don't know what net neutrality is" award!

      Pretty sure you're the one getting that award. Net neutrality is just a way of saying "don't make the major users of bandwidth like YouTube pay more for the service." The internet has been the wild west for a long time, regulations ALWAYS favor the people lobbying for them, which are the people with enough money to do so. Nobody is going to pay outright for a YouTube subscription and nobody is going to watch it at 14.4kb/s, so that means Google will be shelling out money to cover it, they will still make a profit on it but not nearly as much, and that means they can't use their bulk to expand into every other sector horizontally at breakneck speed. That means startups might once again compete with them in some area, etc. It has a bubble effect from one sector to the next which fucks Google sideways a dozen times at once, it's not just a good thing, it's actually profoundly good for society as a whole. There's no reason a company based so heavily in marketing that it has convinced people it isn't just a marketing company should have that much sway, if anything that's a sign they're too good at what they do to be allowed to exist at all.

    6. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take it back. He might just be a fucking moron.

    7. Re:Russia: okay to sell Uranium to... by Noishkel · · Score: 0

      Oh piss off. I know exactly what assholes like you say it is, I just know what the results of it actually are in practicality. And to be blunt I don't really give a shit either way, given that the real problems of the internet have nothing to do with who gets the sweet heart deal in terms of bandwidth. And in reality there's so much dark fiber sitting unused out there that we could expand well beyond what we have now. It's all just different media companies trying to one up one and other to get you to buy more shit and media streaming services.

  6. filtering by engineering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did Eric Schmidt mean when he said: "“It’s basically RT and Sputnik. We’re well aware and we’re trying to engineer the systems to prevent it.” ?

    1. Re: filtering by engineering. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant that RT and Sputnik manipulate the truth with lies and omissions.

      Sara Firth resigned after working for RT for five years. She said on Twitter: âoeI resigned from RT today. I have huge respect for many in the team, but Iâ(TM)m for the truth.â

      "We do work for Putin. We are asked on a daily basis if not to totally ignore then to obscure the truth."

  7. More "Russia" stories than Linux or programming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's pretty sad that we're now getting more "Russia narrative" submissions on the front page here at Slashdot than we are getting submissions about relevant stuff like Linux, programming, or sci-fi.

    If we do a Slashdot search for "russia", the earliest story on the first page of results is from October 30, 2017.

    If we do a Slashdot search for "linux", the earliest story on the first page of results is from October 21, 2017!

    So that means we get subjected to significantly more stories about this "Russia narrative" than we get submissions having to do with Linux!

    It's even worse when we do a Slashdot search for "programming". The earliest first page submission listed there is from October 19, 2017!

    It's much worse when we do a Slashdot search for "scifi" (May 06, 2017) or a Slashdot search for "science fiction" (December 19, 2015).

    I know, I know, some fools here will start with the "Russian agent" false accusations, and other nonsense like that. But the real issue is that Slashdot's quality has declined so severely that significantly more focus is now put on purely political stories than on anything having to do with technology or computing or software or Linux or programming or science fiction and anything interesting like that.

    Slashdot has devolved into a political site that's more like the Huffington Post or Breitbart than it is like the focused tech/science/math/computing site it was during its glory days.

  8. Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by ghoul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The whole reason Silicon Valley can afford to pay huge salaries and create cutting edge work is because what they create is scalable. The money is spent once but can be sold to consumers all over the world at a very low marginal cost of production. Whether that is Operating Systems or Electric Cars.
    People all over the wold buy from the Microsofts and the Googles because they are considered apolitical. If these companies are seen as partisan and Patriotic than consumers and govts all over the world will pull a China and prop up local alternatives. Once the cheap marginal market goes away and its only the US Market you have left to sell too many ideas become non economic to execute . Once you cannot execute new ideas in Silicon Valley due to the cost, people with ideas will go away to cheaper locales to execute and you go into a downward spiral - fewer new ideas->fewer profitable IPOs -> fewer Angel funders ->Even fewer funding for new ideas-> fewer people moving to the Valley to execute->EVEN FEWER NEW IDEAS and so on.

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
    1. Re:Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Silicon Valley companies have no pull in Washington at the moment because they've indulged their progressive politics and invested almost exclusively in the party that's now out of power. Apple, Facebook, Google... these companies are left wing constituents; the (R)s in Washington have no reason to listen to anything they're concerned about. So when it comes time to deal with the purely executive branch aberration of Obama's Net Neutrality the old guard telecoms that know better than to squander their influence by playing party politics get all the wins.

    2. Re:Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If these companies are seen as partisan and Patriotic than consumers and govts all over the world will pull a China and prop up local alternatives.

      Actually, all other nations are also fighting Russia's meddling, so it's more likely that they would approve of these countermeasures. The mistake you are making is believing that the US is a one-off situation.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      "Actually, all other nations are also fighting Russia's meddling, so it's more likely that they would approve of these countermeasures. The mistake you are making is believing that the US is a one-off situation."

      Citation please, because i find it hard to believe that they are meddling in ALL other nations. Quite simply it seems incredibly costly and not very efficient. It makes more sense for Russia to interfere in countries that would be a strategic asset to them (say near their boarders or resource rich countries from which to gain a discount on said resource)

      On the other hand please prove that the USA doesn't do the exact same thing! for example, the middle east (oil), eastern Europe (on Russia's boarder) or generally all around the world.

      Information warfare is the new normal and to believe that it is only Russia that is doing this is foolish. That being said the GP is mostly right, In Europe there are several more localized search engines which are generally promoted by the people with in the area as well as new technology centers for development. The major companies (google, facebook, and the rest) were appealing world wide as long as they seemed non partisan and as citizens of the world. Once they started to take sides then trust in them erodes and individual nations take the ideas and create local versions of them. Personally I think it was just a matter of time before this happened and i am rather happy with the outcome, this will distribute the ideas and create a new diversity of ideas from which to grow with as each locale will have their own unique spin on things.
      and while you are at it show that the us isnt trying to do the exact same things to some very specific countries (being the ones that are a sta

    4. Re: Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What an amazing boogeyman you've invented...

    5. Re:Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whataboutism, folks! Paired with a bit if diarrhea of the keyboard...

    6. Re:Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Whataboutism" The new favorite word used by hypocrites.

    7. Re:Silicon Valley shooting itself in the feet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But whatabout the hypocrites!

  9. Yeah, sure... by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 0

    ...Google does not change its search algorithm to re-rank individual websites. They've never taken money to effectively censor information about things like the BP Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, have they?

    --
    Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  10. Re:Cuz Russia's not w/ Brin & Page's true agen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Illuminists-Luciferian-Masonic-Satanists as Harold Wallace Rosenthal admits in this interview.

    That interview never happened, and the "proof" of it was provided by Nazis after his execution by the Nazis (now operating under the name PLO).

    Everyone hates the Jews. I've still never figured that one out. The only global conspiracy is the Capitalists, trying to install fascism/communism to take over the world.

    Yes, communism is capitalism. Look at Cuba. "communist", but everything was not owned by a democratic government, but by a single man. Everything owned by a single man is capitalism. And that's the capitalism that is in the US.

  11. A row? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How British.

  12. Exact words by Meneth · · Score: 1

    Right, they don't "change their search algorithm", they can just hard-code re-rankings of individual websites.

    1. Re:Exact words by VeryFluffyBunny · · Score: 1

      Yep, the usual weasel words of advertising corporations. We can't believe anything they say.

      --
      Debate is a form of harassment. Do not question my truth.
  13. Re:Cuz Russia's not w/ Brin & Page's true agen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Going to say that about Barbara Spectre (a jew) admitting jews are behind the muslim invasion of Europe? It's her live saying it.

  14. Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seems like Google is feeling invincible. Their only real revenue source is online advertising, so if coin mining replaces ads as a source of payment for content creators, they're going to have problems. Seems like Google power is peaking, sort of like Rockefeller right before oil pipelines made controlling railroad shipping irrelevant.

    1. Re:Hubris by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Seems like Google power is peaking

      In all likelihood Google is about to find itself negotiating with Comcast et al. to stay in the "fast lane." I'm pretty damn sure that if Google occupied some apex of Rockefeller-like power they wouldn't be letting that happen.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:Hubris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like Google power is peaking

      In all likelihood Google is about to find itself negotiating with Comcast et al. to stay in the "fast lane." I'm pretty damn sure that if Google occupied some apex of Rockefeller-like power they wouldn't be letting that happen.

      Google tried, by aligning itself with the Democratic Party and the "permanent Democratic majority".

      Ooops.

      Besides, it's really, really hard to get to "Rockefeller-like power" - I've seen estimates that old John D. owned something like 3 or 4% of the entire US before he started giving his fortune away. He likely gave away well over 90% of his fortune, and his great-great-great grandchildren are still born multimillionaires.

  15. Awful Rags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if they weren't such hives of scum and villainy, they wouldn't get targeted. Russia's efforts would be better spent addressing their own BS before worrying about ours. But we all know that's not their intent...

  16. Shutoff BOTH ads & mining scripts (+ more) via by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    See subject & NEW APK Hosts File Engine 10++ 32/64-bit https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&biw=&bih=&q=%22APK+Hosts+File+Engine%22+and+%22start64%22&btnG=Google+Search&gbv=1/

    Ads/script/malware rob speed/security/privacy/bandwidth.

    Hosts add speed (via hardcodes/adblocks), security (vs. bad sites/malware/poisoned dns), reliability (vs. dns down), & anonymity (vs. dns requestlogs/trackers).

    Less power/cpu/ram + IO use vs. DNS/routers/addons/antivirus + less security bugs/complexity & faster vs. addons/routers/remote dns!

    Avoids DNSChangers in routers/IP settings & dns redirect (99++% of ISP DNS != patched vs. it) + DNS tracking & lighten DNS load & resolve faster via local RAM!

    * W/ what u NATIVELY have in a FASTER kernelmode IP stack (does more w/ less).

    APK

    P.S. - Safe https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/e01211ca36aa02e923f20adee0a3c4f5d5187dc65bdf1c997b3da3c2b0745425/analysis/1433430542/ (self checking vs. infection of it built-in)

  17. Re: Cuz Russia's not w/ Brin & Page's true age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Communism is capitalism"

    Nothing is everything. It's all labels. There's just 2 kinds of people: People who screw everyone else and are in need of being put between the buns of a hamburger and us victims. Why cant the crazed shooters and truck drivers eat them? Because they're dumb controlled sheep.

  18. Google is de-ranking American websites too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course you only hear this from the usual suspects on the alt-right: Breitbart, Alternet, Counterpunch, World Socialist Website, etc...

    They're all alt-right now, along with feminists who support women and gays who oppose getting thrown off rooftops and Jews who oppose being exterminated from their own homeland. If you didn't get the memo, expect to lose your job and be blacklisted across Silicon Valley while they import foreigners to replace you.

  19. Re:More "Russia" stories than Linux or programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Much of the news we read today is for generating clicks/eyeballs/ad revenue/polarizing discussion. I'd rather read a site dedicated to getting humanity off this rock through research and fundraising. Anybody know of one?

  20. The anon troll army is out in force! by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 2

    Russia is one of the few topics that brings out the anon troll army. The other topics I've noticed have this effect are net neutrality and systemd. It's almost as if some powerful people don't want some topics discussed.

    --
    Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    1. Re:The anon troll army is out in force! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try talking about 9/11 here, how we don't know the whole story. Modded to oblivion in 3..2..

    2. Re: The anon troll army is out in force! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the moon landings or Area 51.

  21. Russia's not w/ Brin & Schmidt's true agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews believe this of others they call goyim/gentiles (any non-jew): Jews = biggest racists of all (for which they "jew guilt" you for no less! They're hypocrites known as thieves all thru history or were Argentines in the 1940 under Perrone, Spanish inquistion, France (1306), Egypt (despoiled/robbed by jews), Arabs (pre & post 1948), England (1330 Edward longshanks), Romans under titus, Russia pogroms and Germany who got rid of them from their nations nazi german's too? No. Driven into DESERTS ages ago! Don't wonder why after all those exilings above. Should anyone doubt any of this see Jacob Javits' crony Rosenthal spill the beans on it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D4zMVZ8HnFI/ where he called all Christianity fools for helping Israel and the biggest scam of all time per their beliefs below from their Talmud. This is the province of the synagogue of Satan (Khazar/Pharisees whom Jesus Christ himself kicked to the curb out of the temple & they killed him for it. Jeremiah did the same to them also):

    Barbara Spectre, a jew, tells everyone it's jews orchestrating the muslim migrant problem in Europe https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFE0qAiofMQ/ . No migrant raping of women in Poland. Tons in Sweden. Do the math. Use common-sense. This is to get muslims and other goyim/gentiles to wipe one another out as incompatible cultures that will clash and always have.

    George Soros who funds groups to create division in the USA?? A jew. One who sold his own jew people into death for the nazis. Zucker @ CNN is another frying publicly for lying about "russians" and John Bonifield a producer @ CNN said it is bs. Van Jones did also.

    What World-famous Men have said About the Jews https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4MYPzKNQUE0/

    Harvey Weinstein the child molester tops it all off.

    There are three types of people who call themselves Jews:

    1. True Torah [Sephardic] Jews: these are the descendants of Prophet Jacob-Israel (Jacobites or Israelites) (about 5%-10% of all Jews)

    2. Khazarian or Ashkenazi Jews: these are the descendants of a Turkic idol/phallic worshiping tribe who migrated to Russia in the 7th Century A.C. and whose nobility converted to Judaism in the 8th Century A.C. and now inhabit mostly Europe. (about 90%-95% of all Jews)

    3. Zionist Jews: these are the ones from the 2 above who are pretending to be Jews for political reasons but whoâ(TM)re are actually Illuminists-Luciferian-Masonic-Satanists as Harold Wallace Rosenthal admits in this interview.

    They are led by the neo-Pharisees (occult-priest-banklords). They want to establish a Zionist Luciferian state from the Nile to the Euphrates from where they plan to rule the Earth. The new Israeli Supreme Court funded by the Rothschilds Banklords is full of Masonic Symbols, just like the B.I.S. Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland, which is the Mother of All Private Central Banks.

    The hexagram symbol on the Israeli flag is the ancient Star of Moloch, a Satanic-Baal deity to which people were sacrificed. There is no such thing as a Star of David which the modern Jews have been fooled into believing; however, the True Torah Jews are not fooled by the Zionists Illuminatis and you can visit their websites for more info .

    1. Sanhedrin 59a: "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal."

    2. Abodah Zara 26b: "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed."

    3. Sanhedrin 59a: "A goy (Gentile) who pries into The Law (Talmud) is guilty of death."

    4. Yebhamoth 11b: "Sexual intercourse with a little girl is permitted if she is three years of age."

    5. Schabouth Hag. 6d: "Jews may swear falsely by use of subterfuge wording."

    6. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Do not save Goyim in danger of death."

    7. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Show no mercy to the Goyim."

    8. Choschen Hamm 388, 15: "If it can be proven

  22. As opposed to FAKE NAME for FAKE LIVES here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject "Gravis Zero" (that's your REAL NAME in real life? No): Does that fake name for a fake life make you 'superior'? Let me tell you what it REALLY makes you - a fake hiding behind a FAKE NAME online, nothing more.

    * Get over the "registered 'luser'" bs - it makes you a trackable sheep that's a slave to cookies & javascript on /. in reality.

    APK

    P.S.=> It also doesn't make you an 'authority' on what's REAL vs. what's NOT when YOU YOURSELF don't post as your true self you know... apk

  23. Individual Websites by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

    Google does not change its search algorithm to re-rank individual websites

    Of course not, they just make their algorithms include the material they want omitted, that way they also catch similar material.

  24. Second Thoughts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe it's dangerous to delist or re-rank the web sites of people that have Nuclear weapons? Heck they may take a more cold war view on google employees.

  25. Re: Russia's not w/ Brin & Schmidt's true agen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, your head is really messed out. You must be smoking something neurotoxic, you should stop before itâ(TM)s too late (though it looks like itâ(TM)s already pretty late for you). Maybe you should pop some antipsychotic meds then see the outcome - they may take you out of your delusions ? Good luck with your neurochemistry.

  26. Communications Watch Dog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just exactly whose communications are this authoritarian state dog watching?

  27. Re:More "Russia" stories than Linux or programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fuck off ivan.

    yeah, this *is* what happens when y'all fuck with us.

  28. SJW have a list of sites too? by AHuxley · · Score: 0

    How soon before SJW want that "search algorithm to re-rank individual websites" magic for their party political projects?
    No negative movie reviews around the time of a new movie release?
    Blasphemy?
    No news about illegal immigration?
    No negative comments about Communist leadership?
    Some books and authors have ideas and plots that need to be re-ranked?
    Some movies need to be re-ranked?
    Most of history needs to be hidden.
    Images and movies of political leaders not officially issued by their party?
    Comments about a politicians ability to give a long speech in public should not be easy to find?
    Once the USA starts to re-rank sites, SJW will have a long list of sites with issues they want not found.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  29. Re: More "Russia" stories than Linux or programmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2017 is the year of Russia on the desktop

  30. Re:Russia's not w/ Brin & Schmidt's true agend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, this dude is woke af on the jq!

  31. Re: More "Russia" stories than Linux or programmi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old news: we've had that for the past two years at least.

  32. Other things to consider: by Uberbah · · Score: 0

    This should be filed under the "things to consider before you inject yourself into US politics" department.

    You Russiaphobes has as much evidence as the anti-vaxxers or Chem Trailers do to back up their bullshit. You fell for one piss-poor psyop with the Iraq War, and now you're doing it again. If only Powell knew he could have skipped that presenting-faked-evidence-to-the-UN thing, and just made a bunch of anonymous claims in the CIA-funded WaPo.

    Because people would just eat that shit up. With a spoon.