Man in China Sentenced To Five Years' Jail For Running VPN (theguardian.com)
A Chinese entrepreneur has been sentenced to five and a half years in prison for selling VPN service, a government newspaper said, as Beijing tries to stamp out use of technology that evades its internet filters. From a report: Wu Xiangyang was also fined 500,000 yuan ($75,900), an amount equal to his profits since starting the service in 2013, according to a report in the newspaper of China's national prosecutor's office. The Great Firewall, as the censorship apparatus is commonly known, means people in China are banned from visiting thousands of websites, including Google, Facebook, YouTube and Instagram. Wu ran his VPN service from 2013 until June this year and claimed to serve 8,000 foreign clients and 5,000 businesses.
When in China...
What an awful country. I'm so glad that every big tech company is seeking profits there rather than isolating the nation until they give into at least some idea of reality.
I try not to buy anything made in China, even if it costs more to buy things made elsewhere.
I ask this because I see frogs in bucket of water on a stove. We already have (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cybersecurity_Information_Sharing_Act) this which theoretically undoes the onion router when combined with the repeal of network neutrality.
..turns out he was Wong!
that under China's new draconian social ranking system, he's likely a no one once he emerges from prison.
Inside China's Vast New Experiment in Social Ranking
Looks like he has experienced the yellow peril firsthand.
China is a big jail for human rights, he won't see a big difference outside or inside!
1 profitable
2 famous
3 illegal
You can only choose 2 of them.
Intolerance: my culture is always the right one.
He should have used a VPN to run that thing.
Prohibition against VPNs is by no means restricted to China. In most of the Middle East you can be thrown in jail for using a VPN.
They don't want people to bypass their firewall blocks for services like Skype that would undermine revenues for their Telco carriers. Which, usually, is owned by a close relative of the country's leader.
Its quite odd. Im sitting here on a poplular video chat app with dozens of Chinese folks.... I do this every night, just lounge around with them, chat and dance together... drink together. :) Pajamas....
From the comments I feel most of you have completely the wrong idea about what life is like there. I also feel theres more to this story than meets the eye...
Man you should see some of their homes... everything is silk and gold... just beautiful.
[($)]
By this logic, should the rest of the world avoid all US products because you elected Trump? Or what US military did in the Iraq? Or because the various injustice that had happened in the US court systems? Or someone jails for some law in the US which one may disagree (e.g. drug laws)?
How about which country you are still buying from? Utopia?
I'm living in China about 50% of the time for many years. The general public doesn't try to access international content on the internet that much, but those that do have a very bad experience. The internet in China is subject to 100% deep packet inspection. All connections to the rest of the world are monitored, throttled, or blocked. The only social media and messaging platforms allowed are the horribly compromised spyware approved by the government. All standard VPN protocols are automatically identified by the Great Firewall and throttle or blocked. The only VPNs that work are custom non-standard protocols that must continuously change to avoid detection.
People who disagree with the government regularly disappear without any notification to their families. Let this be a warning to everyone living in the "free" world. It is a very slippery slope. Little by little, our privacy and rights are being taken away.
But when I think of RMS's opinion, I know I'll never success...
MOD UP
Parent is best kind of correct. Governments (all governments) are merely systems to govern populations through a set of rules for employing an exclusive right to the use of deadly force and/or imprisonment (sometimes with the consent of the governed, but often...not so much).