Ecuador is Fighting Crime Using Chinese Surveillance Technology (scmp.com)
Ecuador has introduced a security system using monitoring technology from China, including facial recognition, as it tries to bring down its crime rate and improve emergency management, according to state-run Xinhua news agency. From a report: A network of cameras has been installed across the South American nation's 24 provinces -- keeping watch on its population of 16.4 million people -- using a system known as the ECU911 Integrated Security Service, Xinhua reported. Used by the country's police, armed forces and fire brigade, it went into operation in November 2016 and has an emergency response and monitoring system.
I know from Ecuador had limbs ruined by Communists there. One was a five year-old girl that had her right arm chopped off. the other was an eight (IIRC) year-old boy that had his legs broken so badly and not given medical care so he'll never walk again. A coworker adopted the two of them and our church is helping him, but it's still a struggle for him. He's a damn saint for basically giving up most of him free time to help them.
People are trying to get to Julian Assange.
is a special, highly-guarded gorilla detection algorithm
China -> evil.
EU -> evil.
America -> good.
Russia -> good.
I'm sure the Chinese will be very pleased that Ecuador has volunteered to allow them to surveil their entire country via the inevitable backdoors in the 'security system' they sold them.
Isn't Ecuador.. by *definition* in central america?
If it wasn't the Chinese selling the Ecuadorans the gear, it would be the Israelis or the Europeans or us. It's not like this stuff is exactly uncommon these days.
They probably got it cheaper buying direct from the original manufacturer.
That is all.
The circumference of the earth is 24.9K mi (google), and there are 24 hours in a day so at the equator it's spinning faster than 1000 mph.
China is entirely north of the equator so they're spinning quite a bit slower there. That means the technology wasn't adequately tested for Ecuador's more demanding environment.
Thatâ(TM)s a new slant on it.
The system went into operation more than a year ago. Was it kept secret until today?
I would just point out that in SMACX, both Colonel Santiago and Chairman Yang generally have excellent police, resulting in very few problems with the drones.
And (especially with Yang) if there ever were a problem, he could brutally nerve-staple the problem down quite easily.
The upshot is that I think it would work. I would try it in the game.
BUT I should mention that my most successful games had shitty police and also no drone problems. Diverting even 10% of your energy resources (maybe 20% in the late game when you're stinking fucking rich) to psych, is way better. That also knocks the drones right out, replacing them with talents. Do things right and you'll get golden ages that Yang would never dream of.
Happy drones need not steal. If you bribe them, you don't have to surveille them.
I read the title and was worried there for a second. I mean, sure, I see on some webpages ads of stuff that I just browsed or bought on Amazon, so I am used to some creepiness, but a Slashdot post about me buying a Foscam camera for my country house?
Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
Aside from the fact that most if not all the Hardware for surveillance systems is manuactured/assembled in china, the chinese, by virtue of their MASSIVE surveillance programs at home, probably have an edge in the software front too.
Do not get me wrong, Israel, USoA, India and most of Europe have great programmers, is just that, since surveillance is much less pervasive in those countries, programmers there do not have the 'GINORMOUS' testbed that their chinese colleagues have.
Many things that normaly a programmer could oversee, become a poignant challenge at those scales.
So, at LatAm, we welcome our new narrow eyed overlords.
*** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
What does surveillance have to do with fighting crime?
In every country where totalitarian surveillance was installed (e.g. the UK or France), absolutely nothing improved it terms of crime rate, compared to the same thing without surveillance, and in the entire history of its usage in he UK, the total number of cases where it was useful, was about eight.
Meanwhile, the amount of state terrorism and freedom robbery that it caused, goes into the millions of incidents.
So if anything, IT IS CRIME.
Like most (new) laws nowadays.
Just tack that onto the tab that they have accumulated for however BILLIONS OF DOLLARS they already owe to China
When I was in Ecuador, I saw a couple young girls one around 7yrs., the other around 8 or 9 yrs. carrying a *huge* wad of cash down the street unsupervised. The older girl could barely hold the stack of bills with both hands.
Some areas, of the country, are like Disneyland (for crime), others are less great, but surveillance cameras won't do anything to fix those.
Beautiful place with beautiful people.
So how's that shiny new citizenship looking, Mr. Assange?
It says "went into operation November 2016", so it's been in place for a year.
Has it supposedly served any purpose, done any good, etc?
I don't personally have any problem with cameras in public places where privacy isn't to be expected anyhow. I might have a problem if footage of you being near some crime was used alone to convict you of it, but that's another story.
I refuse to sign