Slashdot Mirror


Official: No One Is Going To Win the Google Lunar X Prize Competition (theverge.com)

The X Prize Foundation announced today that no one is going to win the foundation's competition to send a spacecraft to the Moon. "Only five finalists remained in the Google-sponsored Lunar X Prize competition, and in order to win any grand prize money, the teams had to launch and complete their missions to the Moon before March 31st, 2018," reports The Verge. "But with only two months until the deadline, no team is ready to launch, so Google will keep the prize money instead." From the report: The Google Lunar X Prize was established in 2007 as a way to help lower the cost of getting to space. So far, only government agencies have landed on the lunar surface, with missions that have cost many millions and even billions of dollars. That's why the X Prize Foundation, which sets up global competitions, challenged teams with developing and launching robotic lunar landers using mostly private funding. The idea was to make them come up with creative methods for getting to the Moon on the cheap. Landing on the lunar surface was only part of the challenge. Teams had to travel up to 1,640 feet (500 meters) on the Moon too, as well as do live broadcasts. The first to fulfill all these requirements before the deadline would receive $20 million, while the second place team would get $5 million. Other smaller purses would be awarded to teams that did special tasks, such as completing an orbit around the Moon before landing. "As a result of this competition, we have sparked the conversation and changed expectations with regard to who can land on the Moon," the X Prize Foundation said in its statement. "Many now believe it's no longer the sole purview of a few government agencies, but now may be achieved by small teams of entrepreneurs, engineers, and innovators from around the world." A Google spokesperson also told CNBC that the company is "thrilled with the progress made by these teams over the last ten years."

33 comments

  1. dupe by mrvan · · Score: 4, Informative

    And two days old, in true slashdot fashion:

    https://tech.slashdot.org/stor...

    1. Re:dupe by hcs_$reboot · · Score: 1

      Great Scott!

      --
      Slashdot, fix the reply notifications... You won't get away with it...
    2. Re:dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the spirit of Google extending the Lunar X deadline several times, the /. editors decided to give everyone a second chance to make bad jokes.

    3. Re:dupe by Dutch+Gun · · Score: 1

      -- And Slashdot is OK with that!

      --
      Irony: Agile development has too much intertia to be abandoned now.
  2. Re: Trump is going to win free rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only if you convince him to trade his house for your cell. Good luck, schizo.

  3. Re:Trump is going to win free rent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2 tru

  4. the truth, trust, safety etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    some things we're losing to uncle sam's endless ambitions.. sing along.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lRjItDLnAwc .. add your own personal losings list.. better days ahead, good sports with good spirits prevail,, hang on to your hemisphere.. thanks again....

  5. The price money was nowhere near enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I honestly can't imagine many people thinking $20 would come anywhere close to justifying the cost of what Google was asking for.

    1. Re: The price money was nowhere near enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, plus everyone knows there is already a secret Nazi moon base shaped in the form of a swastika. Apparently they still don't know the war ended, so once anyone does get there they still have to deal with them, which is exactly what Google wants to exploit with some fool for just 20 dollars.

    2. Re:The price money was nowhere near enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes $20 would be a bit low. Even $20 million is a bit light. However it was never the idea that the prize money would be enough for the winner to recoup all their development costs. Think about it; most entrants know they are not likely to win, so they go in knowing it's unlikely they'll get any prize money. Yet they still entered the competition. The point of the competition was to focus minds on the task, and you can't have a competition without a prize, but I very much doubt that the entrants were in it primarily to chase the prize money.

    3. Re:The price money was nowhere near enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't get high caliber minds if the best case scenario (won the prize) is a net loss financially. To be an incentive the prize has to be large enough to justify the attempt after accounting for risk of failure.

      A $20m prize for a moon-shot is like offering a $5 prize for a race across the continental United States.

  6. Re:N1GGERS SPACE AGENCY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  7. Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why would any private enterprise want to waste money going to space? So far nobody has made money going to the Moon, and certainly not any further to Mars.
    Getting to space is the least costly, its staying in space that's the real issue. People would be living on the Moon now if it was riddled with diamonds or had some valuable commodity. Then you would see companies running to invest.

    1. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why have a research station at the South Pole? Why sail around the world on an expedition? Why send humans to the Moon at all, nearly 50 years ago?

      There's useful research to be done, for one, both from the project itself and the engineering to make it possible. What seems arcane and pointless at the time might become useful and common in the future.

      Obviously it's possible to send humans to the Moon. This is about making it feasible for commercial travel to the Moon. It's about finding ways to lower the costs enough that this can be done on a larger scale. What seems like a monumental effort to travel to the Moon now might become much simpler in a few decades, possibly making it easier to travel betond the Moon as well.

      Your criticism could be made of many scientific experiments and technological advances when they first happened. It has no merit.

      Google should extend the prize a reasonable amount of time, in order to continue promoting this research. There's no reason for this to end in March.

      Also, what's with all the off-topic garbage comments being posted? Slashdot really sucks now.

    2. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We don't need that kind of research anymore. Science at its current status pretty much provides for our real-life needs and some. There are no benefits in investing more. We're never going to colonize the Solar System, we're never going to travel to the stars, we're never going anywhere. That's a cold fact and science pretty much drove the nails into the coffin of any hope of space-based future. It's not going to happen, period. So, we don't need any more science. The future is going to be less technological and more eco-technic. In a hundred years or less the human population will lower to a more sustainable number and we have more than enough knowledge to keep them fed until the inevitable extinction of the human race. And that's all there is to it.

    3. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that really is the best future we can imagine. Good for mankind (general happiness), and good for the rest of the universe (unpolluted by mankind).

    4. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://patentlyo.com/patent/2011/01/tracing-the-quote-everything-that-can-be-invented-has-been-invented.html

    5. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is he trolling? I can't honestly tell. Also, this is slashdot, aren't we supposed to feed the AC trolls anyway?

    6. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an alternate XXX Prize. The first team to make PopeRatzo's mother airtight wins $20 and a free STD testing kit.

      PIV x PIA x PIM = PI (V x A x M) = $20

      I heard dangers include prolapse, bed collapse, and webcam wiretaps.

    7. Re:Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So far nobody has made money going to the Moon, and certainly not any further to Mars.

      Duh maybe because no company has gone there? Only governments have gone, and they didn't go to make money. Your lack of vision is disturbing.

    8. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to ask, he probably is...so best to ignore him.

    9. Re: Old dumb news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I strongly disagree......

      The only way we will not be colonizing the solar system is if we wipe ourselves out.

      Short of that, with the current economic models, which require infinite growth or it will collapse (and the growth is exponential, not linear), there is no way in hell we will not colonize the solar system.

      It's only a matter of time before the cost of colonizing the solar system profits from exploiting the near infinite resources. The technology is already available.

      As for interstellar travel and colonization, well, that is still in the realm of science fiction, and will likely remain there.

  8. http://www.coracle.in/ by coracleinfotechindia · · Score: 0

    nice one... view more at http://www.coracle.in/

  9. It was already posted here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because we never landed on the moon,. if we would, trip would be 50$ one way by now...

  10. If only there was a prize for detecting dupes... by Sebby · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... this problem would have been solved long ago.

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
  11. Trying not to say we told you so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every other millennial-conceived sci-fi fantasy will meet a similar fate. Sorry your parents lied to you about, well, pretty much everything. Reality doesn't care. Mars in five years? Don't make us laugh.

  12. Re:N1GGERS SPACE AGENCY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA: North American Street Apes

  13. There's no outer space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we're really just like Jonas, in a sealed waterproof galley.