Slashdot Mirror


Elon Musk's Boring Company Delivers $600 Flamethrower (theverge.com)

Last December, Boring Company CEO Elon Musk promised to sell a Boring Company-branded flamethrower after selling 50,000 Boring Company hats. Well, sure enough, 50,000 hats were sold and Musk is delivering on his promise. The Verge reports: Mark this down as one of the promises Elon delivers on, apparently, because it looks like the Boring Company flamethrower is here. Redditors in a few SpaceX, Boring Company, and Musk-related subreddits noticed earlier this week that the URL "boringcompany.com/flamethrower" started redirecting to a page with a password box. And at least one user was able to guess the original password, too: "flame." (It's since been changed.) Behind that password was a shop page that looks just like the one for The Boring Company's hat. But instead of a $20 cap, they found a preorder prompt for a $600 flamethrower. "Prototype pictured above," the listing reads. "Final production flamethrower will be better."

106 comments

  1. Plasma would be more appropriate by RhettLivingston · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why "flame"? This doesn't exactly work with the push against the carbon industries. Perhaps something like a plasma thrower would be more appropriate. You could generate that with electricity.

    Maybe you could ionize the flame and accelerate it with an electric field as a compromise?

    1. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by RhettLivingston · · Score: 2

      Thinking about this more, it seems like a device so closely associated with the largest investor in Tesla should contain a Tesla coil to generate lightning bolts. Perhaps you could generate an ionized trail in some fashion for them to follow? If you simply blew a stream of ionized air out could you get a ball of lightning to mostly stay within it?

    2. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      "Flame" as a password worked initially, but not any more. Seeing how Elon is from South Africa, and that Cape Town is suffering from a severe drought, maybe we should try "Water" as the password.

    3. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why "flame"?

      George Carlin answers that: "We have some people we'd like to throw flames on."

    5. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Plasma is unstable. It takes a level of power quite difficult to handle just to generate the small jet for a plasma cutter. If you want a plasma thrower, such a thing could be built - but you'll need to carry around a foot-wide umbilical to the nearest substation to supply power and cooling water.

    6. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Maybe you could ionize the flame and accelerate it with an electric field as a compromise?"

      Old news. Flame Speakers have been around for decades:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasmatronics

      Plasmas can also be Modulated and then accelerated, and this was done once that I know of, (And warned to never do again...)
      40Ar+8; the Primary Buncher was modulated by a Dynaco Mk. III. The load, admittedly, was insane. The Ion beam was collected after being accelerated to 180 MeV, demodulated, and fed into a Celestion Ditton Speaker. (Total Beam Power: ~0.9 Watts.)
      Jethro Tull never sounded more distorted, but the Kids dug it.

    7. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      Björk had the best use of a Tesla coil

      I've got eclectic taste in music, and I appreciate performance art, but I just don't get her at all. I don't understand the energy in her audiences. I feel like I'm watching a foreign comedian and I see that the audience appreciates the act but I don't know the language.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    8. Re: Plasma would be more appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why flame? Well obviously so it'd be guessed and all the free advertising and hype woud be out there. You cant just buy publicity you know. Nobody reads adds, if they even see them. And there has to be some distraction from the battery woes article further up. Well played, but im sick of all the advertising for tech companies we see this way over and over these days.

    9. Re:Plasma would be more appropriate by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      The flamethrower is a direct reference to a scene in Spaceballs about merchandising.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  2. Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got my hat yesterday. I wear it proudly because I believe in this mission. If successful this is what Musk will be remembered for in the future.

    1. Re:Hat by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Remembered for the hat or the flamethrower?

    2. Re: Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both

    3. Re: Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If not successful then yes the hat.

    4. Re: Hat by Rei · · Score: 2

      "Tesla fan" is going to take on new connotations if it becomes trendy for them to carry around flamethrowers as a sign of support for Musk's companies.

      Maybe it'll end up that Tesla fans start getting hired to run security, in the way that Hell's Angels used to be. Then we'll end up waking up one day reading about how 7 people were charred to death during a ruckus at a Radiohead concert...

      --
      How come things that happen to stupid people keep happening to me?
    5. Re:Hat by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I expect he'll ultimately be remembered for taking generally-dismissed technologies, building PR campaigns styled after P.T. Barnum, and creating reasonably-successful companies using excitement to offset the extremely-high risk that led to the technologies being rejected the first time around.

      Musk's PR stunts are exactly that. There is little scientific value (besides a dead-weight test) in launching a car into orbit... but by doing so, he can inspire another round of news stories and keep his name in front of the upcoming generation of engineers. Similarly, of course he's going to sell branded flamethrowers, because every reckless idiot (myself included) is going to think "Gee, I could probably spare $600 for that" and start clearing space in the living room next to the life-size Boba Fett statue. It'll be a great conversation piece, and a piece of history if/when the tunnels become successful.

      I'm not going to opine on whether showmanship is a good or bad thing for investment purposes, but I am happy to see the public eye turning toward the real challenges to progress. Yes, the rockets blow up, the permits are a hassle, and building new manufacturing factories requires obscene amounts of money... but those problems are not insurmountable, with enough persistence (and funding). Don't worry about how hard your math homework seems, little Timmy... just give it another try, like your hero Elon Musk!

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    6. Re:Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Reasonably successful"? How so? Which of this charlatan's companies are successful by any reasonable measure? Tesla motors cannot set up a production line for two decades now, something Ford achieved in the 1920s without billions of government subsidies. His battery factory is still importing Panasonic cells. Forget the giga and the mega, do they sell at least in the 10k range of units a year?

      Space-X is alive only because of the money it got upfront from NASA for launches they may or may not deliver.

      The "Boring company" is so boring, they're selling hats made in China. That's your average kickstarter business acumen.

      You Musk cocksuckers may live in a parallel universe where he is "successful", but in the real world he's just another child of the American corporate socialism.

    7. Re:Hat by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Launching a car into space as part of the Falcon Heavy test is certainly a P.T. Barnum sort of thing to do, but the Falcon Heavy test needs to launch some sort of mass simulator.

    8. Re:Hat by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Space-X is alive only because of the money it got upfront from NASA for launches they may or may not deliver.

      This is just not true. SpaceX has had a wide variety of non-NASA customers. Falcon 9 launched 18 times in 2017, which is 20% of all launches globally and about 2/3rds of all US launches , and the vast majority of those launches were not for NASA http://space.skyrocket.de/doc_chr/lau2017.htm. Moreover, SpaceX has delivered cargo launches to the ISS repeatedly for NASA, and with the exception of one launch in 2015, all of those have been successful.

    9. Re:Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mass simulator"? What's that? You cocksucking elon-faggots are a funny bunch.

    10. Re:Hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should know, it's not like this is rocket science. Oh. wait. Scratch that, it actually is rocket science this time. My bad.

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=mass+simulator+site%3Anasa.gov

    11. Re:Hat by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      ULA is alive only because of the money it got upfront from USAF for launches they may or may not deliver.

      Fixed that for you. :-p

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    12. Re:Hat by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I can understand what a hat might be good for. But what, exactly, might one want a flamethrower for? I suppose ISIS or the Taliban could find a use for a few gross of the product. But I suspect they could get a better price elsewhere.

      (Indeed, Amazon offers a wide variety of devices from $300 down to a $11 "Culinary Torch - Auto Ignition Flamethrower Butane Burner Gas Torch for Camping Welding BBQ" A Culinary Torch for Welding BBQs? Yep. How have I gotten by all this time without one of those?)

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    13. Re:Hat by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Knotweed, perhaps. That sounds like a good application of a flamethrower.

    14. Re:Hat by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I think the other (critical) poster has a small point. "mass simulator" is a lousy term. "test mass" or some such would be much better. It's got to be a real mass, not a simulation of a mass.

      But, to me, launching his car seems a good move. The PR is probably worth more than the car, and he wouldn't want to launch some client's load on something that's so likely to blow up. Besides, it's a great excuse to buy a new car.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    15. Re:Hat by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I agree fully on both points.

      Yes, the test needs mass. Other folks would be quite happy to use a block of concrete, or sandbags, or even a weighted mock-up of their intended load... but Musk uses a sports car, and gets more headlines and more front-page pictures. Those are what he'll be remembered for.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  3. Elon Musk Toilet Paper by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

    >> Boring Company, the Flamethrower

    If it's good enough for Spaceballs, it's good enough for Elon.

    1. Re:Elon Musk Toilet Paper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to the "budget" Tesla car, the one they collected pre-order money for? Is it going to be available soon?

    2. Re:Elon Musk Toilet Paper by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1

      He is truly the "Greatest Showman" of our time.

    3. Re:Elon Musk Toilet Paper by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      What would kick ass is a small Elon Musk doll with a string in the back which when pulled makes the doll say "May the schwartz be with you".

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
  4. Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's actually legal is most states, because they either have no laws for it or require a license.

    1. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome* thing is

    2. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handy for clearing out that weed patch in the back forty.

    3. Re:Worst thing is... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      It's actually legal is most states

      As it should be. A flamethrower consists of:

      1. A fuel tank.
      2. A compressed air tank.
      3. A hose
      4. An ignitor

      Since these components are legal, it seems silly to make it illegal to connect them.

      Flamethrowers have legitimate peaceful uses, such as brush clearing.

      What we really needs is a compact flamethrower that can be mounted on a drone.

    4. Re: Worst thing is... by slazzy · · Score: 1

      They use them for roofing, road construction.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    5. Re: Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They work good for body hair removal too.

    6. Re:Worst thing is... by mjdrzewi · · Score: 2

      I think you confused legal and illegal. Legal in every state but California. https://www.online-paralegal-p... https://www.quora.com/Is-it-le...

    7. Re:Worst thing is... by RhettLivingston · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Wikipedia seems to disagree with you. Maybe you know the citations necessary to go correct the article? They cited a Washington Post story which is weaker than a reference to a law might be.

      In the United States, private ownership of a flamethrower is not restricted by federal law. Flamethrowers are legal in 48 states and restricted in California and Maryland.

    8. Re:Worst thing is... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, my reading of 27 CFR 447.21 puts them in the same category as howitzers and mortars. IANAL; maybe there's something I'm missing?

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    9. Re:Worst thing is... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 0

      It's actually legal is most states, because they either have no laws for it or require a license.

      Fuck off to the UK or something if you want a nanny state.

    10. Re:Worst thing is... by RhettLivingston · · Score: 1

      A surface reading indicates this is about import/export. I suspect that is the key. There are many legal things that are controlled in import/export.

      I'm pretty sure that mortars are legal unless it has changed... during my freshman year of college, my dorm roommate brought is civil war era mortar to school for homecoming. I'll never forget because he fired it in front of the dorm using a mixture of flour and gunpowder to create a bigger flash. He then put it in our room for the week following homecoming while we were all out of town for Thanksgiving break. When we got back, the whole dorm was looking for the source of the smell that had ruined virtually every article of clothing in the dorm. The result of flour+gunpowder is apparently a large amount of sulfur dioxide. It really, really stunk. We had to toss everything from our room, including the mattresses. :)

      Interestingly, the Wikipedia article does indicate that the answer is very different for the UK... up to ten years in the clink.

    11. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's be an indispensable accessory when traveling to San Francisco.

      Isn't it flaming already?

    12. Re: Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donâ(TM)t spread misinformation like that. You probably think silencers and machine guns are illegal too.
      https://www.xproducts.com/product/xm42-flame-thrower/

    13. Re:Worst thing is... by ArylAkamov · · Score: 1

      Wrong. They are perfectly legal in almost every state, and most local jurisdictions. I've built a few for 4th of July parties. There are no federal laws against them.
      Continue talking out your ass though.

    14. Re: Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for skin and body removal.

    15. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    16. Re:Worst thing is... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      Sigh... and we had a serial arsonist here who started the fire that burned Lower Lake, CA. I bet he didn't use a flame thrower. You don't need one to start a wild fire. Faulty power lines throwing a few sparks is all you need. Gasoline and a match would do just fine. All this law does is probably send a few recreational users to Nevada.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    17. Re: Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use them for roofing, road construction.

      A big torch is not the same as a flame thrower...

    18. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or birds dropping flaming sticks.

    19. Re: Worst thing is... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      As it should be. A flamethrower consists of:

      1. A fuel tank.
      2. A compressed air tank.
      3. A hose
      4. An ignitor

      Since these components are legal, it seems silly to make it illegal to connect them.

      That doesn't seen to stop legislators though. To quote the late great George Carlin, "Selling is legal. Fucking is legal. Why isn't selling fucking legal?"

    20. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the spirit, nigga. America, fuck, yeah!

    21. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also have a functional education system, a good healthcare system, fewer morons and also far less butthurt right-wing nutjobs. Also, when's the last time we had a mass shooting at a school?!

    22. Re: Worst thing is... by mpoulton · · Score: 1

      That statute only applies to MILITARY flamethrowers, which this is not. It does not appear to spray burning sticky liquid, just flaming gas - which really makes it a "torch" rather than a "flamethrower" as it's used with regard to weapons. Moreover, that's an import restriction statute, not a prohibition on possession or domestic sale.

      --
      I am a geek attorney, but not your geek attorney unless you've already retained me. This is not legal advice.
    23. Re: Worst thing is... by blindseer · · Score: 1

      A big torch is not the same as a flame thrower...

      While I might agree with you that does bring up the question, what is the distinction between a big torch and a flamethrower? If we create a spectrum of things that produce flame, with step one being defined as "cigarette lighter" and step two as "plumber's torch", then how many steps would I have to go before getting to something defined as a "flamethrower"?

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
    24. Re: Worst thing is... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 2

      what is the distinction between a big torch and a flamethrower?

      A torch shoots out heat.
      A flamethrower shoots out burning liquid fuel.

    25. Re: Worst thing is... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      depending on location here in the USA from 15 to 85 percent of the time it's an enslaved or indentured servant woman's services being sold, which is not and should not be legal

    26. Re:Worst thing is... by istartedi · · Score: 1

      A cigarette butt isn't a burning stick; but it's close.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    27. Re:Worst thing is... by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Your education system is designed to brainwash plebs, just like everywhere else - though it's "functional" from the standpoint that the British people are soulless nothings led by idiots who have grown complacent at their passivity. Your healthcare system consists of a bunch of office-drone-tier abominations waiting to check the box saying they can dispose of the corpse and clean the sheets. Your population is being replaced by Islamic terrorists. We'll keep the guns, now stay on your side of the internet and be grateful we let you on it at all.

    28. Re:Worst thing is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they're used in agriculture and roofing.

  5. Nice tool to have by rmullig2 · · Score: 0

    This would really spice up the next paintball outing.

    1. Re: Nice tool to have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All in the heat of the moment

    2. Re:Nice tool to have by HiThere · · Score: 1

      So you follow http://www.the-whiteboard.com/... ? I did notice that today's episode was about flame throwers.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  6. I got my hat today. by ZeroNullVoid · · Score: 1

    I got my hat today. I feel like they waited for the flame thrower numbers before they sent out the hats. I'll probably invest in that and wear it around as I believe in the mission.

    1. Re:I got my hat today. by Rei · · Score: 1

      Wear your flamethrower around? Are you auditioning for the next Mad Max or something?

      What is the "mission" for a flamethrower? ;)

      --
      How come things that happen to stupid people keep happening to me?
    2. Re:I got my hat today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What is the "mission" for a flamethrower? ;)

      Alternative to raking leaves next autumn? A really cool way to light a barbecue? A fantastic incentive to get people to stop smoking? ("Yes... sure I've got a light...")

    3. Re:I got my hat today. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Which mission?
      The other poster took one reasonable interpretation, i.e. selling flame throwers.
      Another reasonable interpretation would be that you believe in automated tunnel construction.
      Another would be that you believe in electric cars.
      Another would be that you believe in dying on Mars.

      There are so many wildly different interpretations of "I believe in the mission" in that context that it's impossible to make a reasoned interpretation. I'll give you credit for sanity and discount the "believing in selling flame throwers" interpretation, though that's the one that is, on the surface, the most probable. But that still leaves all the others, including many I didn't detail.

      Actually, it's not important that you respond to this post, but do think more carefully about what you post if you actually want people to understand what you mean. I will guess that you mean you support SpaceX's mission to Mars. But that *is* a guess, and is based on my biases more than on what you said.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  7. Security by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

    ”And at least one user was able to guess the original password, too: "flame." (It's since been changed).”

    That’s just the kind of attention to security best practices I’d expect from a Founder of PayPal.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Security by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 2

      Thatâ(TM)s just the kind of attention to security best practices Iâ(TM)d expect from a Founder of PayPal.

      Whooooooooooosh!

      Dude, do really think they didn't expect - nay, didn't want the pass to be "discovered"? Really?

      The replacement is probably just as "pithy".

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just the kind of attention to security best practices I'd expect from a Founder of PayPal.

      (0) This isn't exactly critical data here. Someone who guessed the password was able to look at a photo a few days early... big deal.

      (1) You are telling us that you expect a Founder of PayPal personally set up a shopping page on the web site of one of his companies? I'll give you a little clue: the man has people who work for him, and those people do stuff. I'll tell you a secret... Elon Musk didn't personally write the Autopilot software, either.

      (2) I'm pretty sure you were joking. It wasn't funny. Try again.

      HTH, HAND, KTHXBAI

    3. Re:Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thatâ(TM)s just the kind of attention to security best practices Iâ(TM)d expect from a Founder of PayPal.

      Whooooooooooosh!

      Was that the sound of a point being missed, or did someone fire their flame thrower?

  8. Flame On! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the superhero (or is that supervillain?) Elon Musk is showing his true identity.

  9. Stoneburner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory Dune reference.

  10. Theatrics to distract from Tesla's shoddy finances by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Musk is doing this to drum up PR to get investors to keep buying stock in his companies which are unable to subsist on their own without the public dole.

  11. Shut up and take my money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want!!! What will I do with it? ANYTHING I want. Who's going to stop a guy with a flamethrower...

    1. Re: Shut up and take my money by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      A good guy with a flame thrower, obviously.

  12. Re: Theatrics to distract from Tesla's shoddy fina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As the dragon said, "fucking millenials."

  13. After the flamethrower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Elon is poised to announce an RPG launcher for those afternoons when you just want to goof around in the yard...

    1. Re:After the flamethrower... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn, i want my minigun!

  14. I'll take two.... by AmazingRuss · · Score: 2

    .... this place needs purifying.

  15. Edgy +1 by JohnStock · · Score: 1

    He's so edgy, he's my hero. Bro he even read rocket science books.

    1. Re:Edgy +1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not my hero. He's an overrated, pasty-face chode from South Africa with a Trump sized ego. He's not even an engineer. Just a businessman selling overpriced toys to the upper class.

  16. Buy 9 U can by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    Get to low earth Orbit :)

    --
    [($)]
  17. Look at the source. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The source of the information is https://twitter.com/FalconGridFin

    Griddy McGridfinFace
    "I steer @F9FirstStage and @FHeavyBooster's lift towards @TheDroneShip, @LandingZone1, or @SLC4_LZ2. I deploy after MECO and stage seperation. Parody account."

    Parody.
    Account.

  18. Typical Musk shipping delays... by Moof123 · · Score: 2

    Boring hats are already weeks beyond their originally quoted delivery dates, for a hat. I can imagine the safest way to keep your kid's hands off a flame thrower is to let them order one from Musk.

  19. If you make a $600 deposit by Latent+Heat · · Score: 1

    do you get a Founder's Series flamethrower?

  20. They can have my flamethrower... by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2

    I'll give you my flamethrower when you pry it from my scorched, dead hands.

    1. Re:They can have my flamethrower... by blindseer · · Score: 1

      Your proposal is acceptable.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      --
      I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  21. Elon Musk Toilet Paper (Tesla stock certificates) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tesla and Solar City stock certificates are Elon Musk toilet paper.

  22. Spaceballs by Templer421 · · Score: 1

    The lunch box.

  23. Finally! by pesho · · Score: 1

    An affordable flame thrower for the masses! What could possibly go wrong?

    1. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst? Musk will get a large government subsidy, line his pockets with it and then will fail to deliver on time, like everything else he's been doing.

    2. Re:Finally! by turkeyfish · · Score: 1

      Scott Pruitt and Ryan Zinke appear ready to put in a large order as part of their efforts to "improve" public lands.

      Evidently, they figure it will be a lot quicker to reach their goals than waiting for timber companies to do clear cutting or just waiting for global warming and pine bark beetles to decimate national forests.

    3. Re:Finally! by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      The TSA will still stop you for having a nail file on your carry-on while the person in front of you wears one of these and passes through the airport security check without a problem?

    4. Re:Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An affordable flame thrower for the masses! What could possibly go wrong?

      Affordable? You can make your own boosh cannon for a much less. This is an overpriced luxury flamethrower.

  24. For Elon Haters by mentil · · Score: 5, Funny

    'Flamebait' has a whole new meaning now.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  25. Re:Theatrics to distract from Tesla's shoddy finan by lgw · · Score: 1

    Musk is doing this to drum up PR to get investors to keep buying stock in his companies which are unable to subsist on their own without the public dole.

    As opposed to GM?

    --
    Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  26. A vision of the future by hackertourist · · Score: 1

    Elon's end game is becoming clear.
    TBC produces tunnel boring machines, flamethrowers, hats. Add an anvil and some rocket engines to the catalog and he can rename the company ACME. Contract SpaceX for the 'instant delivery' option.

  27. whats the monkpower by mapkinase · · Score: 1

    of thay flamethrower?

    --
    I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
  28. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0DLZGOZWDHs

  29. Re: Theatrics to distract from Tesla's shoddy fina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem outraged by what is a very common thing for larger business, particularly in USA.

    Hope you donâ(TM)t drive any other car, use a bank or take any medications.

    Maybe youâ(TM)re just angry because now you know how a bit more about how the world works and you canâ(TM)t believe you never knew.

    Did you also know that large businesses get custom tax rulings? You can get totally different rules with enough persistence and threats of shedding workers. The government will essentially pay to employ people via tax kickbacks.

  30. flamethrower ORIGIN: American farmee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WHAT: flamethrower was invented to remove paperwasp nests.
    WHY: on thousands of acres of crops, paperwasps are always welcome for hunting caterpillars, but paperwasp nests uncontrolled could grow hidden the size of a bus and mean certain death should any man or animal walk near.
    HOW: inspired from napalm, sprayed on a nest which is physically crafted by cellulose, burns the nest and pupae and adult wasps in quick time.
    WHEN: make your own mockup flamethrower with a squirt gun loaded by alcohol-based liquid hand soap by attaching a cigarette lighter near the barrel without damaging the gun.

    WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?

  31. An exciting product from a boring company? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    To quote B-grade sci-fi... that does not compute
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  32. Can it be installed on the cars? by SYSS+Mouse · · Score: 1

    I want to know.

    P.S. Flamethrower on normal cars, to deter car thieves, won the 1999 Ig Nobel Peace Prize.