Slashdot Mirror


Verizon Drops Plans To Sell Huawei Phones Due To US Government Pressure (bloomberg.com)

Bloomberg reports that Verizon has dropped all plans to sell phones by Chinese manufacturer Huawei due to pressure from the U.S. government. The decision comes after AT&T walked away from a deal earlier this month to sell Huawei smartphones in the U.S. Bloomberg: Huawei devices still work on both companies' networks, but direct sales would've allowed them to reach more consumers than they can through third parties. The government's renewed concern about Chinese spying is creating a potential roadblock in the race between Verizon and AT&T to offer 5G, the next generation of super-fast mobile service. Huawei is pushing to be among the first to offer 5G-capable phone, but the device may be considered off-limits to U.S. carriers who are beginning to offer the next-generation service this year in a few cities. U.S. security agencies and some lawmakers fear that 5G phones made by companies that may have close ties to the Chinese government could pose a security risk.

69 comments

  1. and just where are all the other phones made? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    uhh.... bingo.

    china.

    and not just 'made in china', either. some of the component suppliers and manufacturers are at least partially-owned by the chinese government.

    i wonder if the feds still by thinkpads? lenovo is also partially-owned by the chinese government.

  2. Who would want to buy a phone... by markjhood2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

    preloaded with Chinese spyware you can't delete? Good old American NSA spyware is good enough for me!

    1. Re:Who would want to buy a phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better... good old NSA owned mobile networks and on the cheap.

    2. Re:Who would want to buy a phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... I need to go buy more backdoored AMD and Intel processors

    3. Re:Who would want to buy a phone... by beckett · · Score: 1

      Good old American NSA spyware is good enough for me!

      Android user detected

    4. Re:Who would want to buy a phone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple fanboi fuckwit detected

  3. I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be better to make ALL cellphones more secure, by law, and protect consumers from all spying, than to just block specific countries from selling phones because of spying? Or is that a silly question?

    I don't trust rich people here to protect my safety and security, any more than I trust the government of China.

    1. Re:I have a better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you trust the government of America? They would LOVE to make ALL cellphones more "secure". Every single one would have a government-mandated backdoor. Once broken, every government and hack in the world will have access. I guess there is security in being one hacked phone in a country of 100% hacked phones.

      There are no wins here. It would take us over a decade to redesign everything from scratch, create our own chip fabs and assembly operations, and make our own phones. You'd have to go that far because the processors today are so complicated that you could never certify one truly secure if it were made in another country. Even making it in this country you'd run a very real danger of someone slipping a security flaw in. The industrial espionage and sabotage operations are very sophisticated today.

    2. Re:I have a better idea by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re "Wouldn't it be better to make ALL cellphones more secure, by law"?
      How could the NSA collect it all if every cell phone had real crypto? Real crypto that had to be worked on per phone for a few mins, hours, days per interesting person?
      Real time access is the only way to support the collect it all mission globally with big brand junk crypto been the standard.
      How could the GCHQ meet its Data Retention and Investigatory Powers Act obligations to collect it all if every cell phone had a complex crypto lock?
      Junk crypto allows the UK to collect on interesting political groups in the USA that support Ireland without having to ask the USA for crypto keys to US cell phones.
      A small town, city in the USA has its police under investigation by internal affairs. Should that investigation be blocked as the people under investigation know to use any good quality cell phone?
      Thats what police, contractors gov and mil want. Easy access to all cell phone data, voice prints, GPS, live mic, camera, files without needing to wait or have to push new gov malware onto every cell phone of interest.
      Make that too difficult and the interesting people will notice the gov/mil/police malware been pushed down onto their cell phone.
      The interesting people stop talking and the good investigators get nothing.
      Thats why cell phone crypto is such junk. The police and security services need a real time way in.
      Criminals, spies, dual citizens, people of faith, the corrupt just keep walking around with the cell phones as they still understand the crypto to work.
      The big trusted brand would never give their data/voice prints/files to their gov/mil/police...

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    3. Re: I have a better idea by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Re: "Criminals, spies, dual citizens, people of faith, the corrupt just keep walking around with the cell phones as they still understand the crypto to work."

      Surely this must be changing? More & more ordinary citizens are realizing our phones come p0wned from the factory and are snooping our every move. I can only imagine that "interesting" people must have come earlier to the same realization.

      I see on /. that Apple's FBI theatrics have persuaded a few gullible fanbois that iPhones are "secure". But I think that's more of the effect of Apple's Reality Distortion Field than anything else. Surely an actual international mobster, spy, revolutionary, terrorist, freedom fighter, etc must be more clueful than your average Apple customer.

    4. Re:I have a better idea by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be better to make ALL cellphones more secure, by law

      First, you should define secure, and then discover that it's either impossible to achieve (because crackers can find the next exploit), or annoys the power users who want advanced features of the device (because they want to get features unavailable in a stock OS).

    5. Re: I have a better idea by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Re " "interesting" people must have come earlier to the same realization."
      The US mil lets its own special forces, troops, contractors, medical experts, support staff run around with consumer devices?
      The NSA and GCHQ would have seen all the data flowing out of the black sites globally as part of their security support for such black sites?

      I doubt everyone is that unaware all the time in the different agencies at that level of mil security awareness.
      It was allowed as the devices gave a feeling of joy and pleasure to the people far away from home? A huge wage and few consumer comforts?

      Re 'international mobster, spy, revolutionary, terrorist, freedom fighter"
      A lot of their help comes from lawyers, human rights lawyers, faith groups, dual citizens, police looking for cash, the media with access to security cleared telco workers.
      If the interesting people are not seeing cell phone discovery presented to police by a brand, telco then the interesting people might actually still think its safe.
      The people selling out the USA to interesting people from what they see might also really be seeing "nothing" and report that back for cash, or as been part of the same community, faith.
      The other complication is mid and low level corrupt police, politicians who see what can be done with stingray, federal agents with LETC flights. If they only see real time results as an ID location not a voice print, not the files on a cell phone, not a live mic, then thats all still ok.
      PRISM and DROPOUTJEEP https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... should have been the wake up to a generation to go dark and stay dark. It was not.
      What did they get reassured about by their contracts deep in the US law enforcement, mil, gov structure that kept them using trusting consumer cell phones?
      Are interesting people having their corrupt contacts deep in the telco world tell them its still all ok except for location?

      The news of China having total access to every aspect of the US telco system just by selling consumer products in the USA?
      Yet the US consumer brands are 100% safe from the security services... ?
      The telco system is both 100% secure when using the correct brands and 100% open to another nation?
      Someone has every voice print in the USA and is not allowing US law enforcement to upset the collection or crypto is holding and the spy, revolutionary, terrorist, freedom fighter, corrupt police know its still ok to talk?
      What are security services doing with their billions in domestic collect it all project funding, water cooling and power usage if that are not collecting it all?
      But a China can totally collect it all it all with a few investments in US consumer grade tech?

      Someone in US law enforcement has that "Reality Distortion Field" set to max and its still working.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  4. free market by kiviQr · · Score: 1

    ....free market and Trump's promises to remove regulations.

    1. Re:free market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, he ran on a platform of protectionism. Something that's actually popular.

    2. Re: free market by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out what his platform actually was. Depends on which of his brainfarts he chose to release that day. Really the only consistency has been incendiary anti-immigrant rhetoric - that noble, time-tested populace-rallying tool.

    3. Re: free market by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out what his platform actually was. Depends on which of his brainfarts he chose to release that day.

      Trump was consistently protectionist and anti-free-trade throughout his campaign and so far through his presidency.

      If you are "trying to figure out" his position on trade, then you haven't been paying attention.

    4. Re: free market by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Two sides of the same xenophobic coin, as I see it. One of the interesting things with the Trump presidency is how transparently rooted a lot of it is in the psychology of the one man. Not that other presidents didn't have a psyche or an ego, but they did a much better job abstracting that from both their policies and their rhetoric. I don't recall (for example) Bush ever flipping so quickly and pointedly his opinion of a man, as Trump did with Comey, over a perceived personal slight, which is how Trump reads any hint of disloyalty.

      Regarding specific protectionist policies, like his proposed flat border tax on all imports from Mexico, there's been plenty of flip-flopping. I'd be interested to know why he listened to the economists when they told him to drop that one, but he didn't listen to many of those same economists that told him his tax plan wasn't so hot. Perhaps his very personal gain from the latter. He's never been one for details, to put it generously, except where his own funds are immediately concerned. That's why he shifted his career away from actual real estate and developing (too risky, too many bankruptcies, too many details) into a sort of branding empire - a master of image manipulation.

  5. Huawhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trump making America Great Again?

    1. Re:Huawhat? by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Nope, this is Trump doing as much damage as he can before he is impeached.

      After all the spying revelations about the US alphabet soup agencies , the 96% of the worlds population that does not live in the USA don't trust the US an more than they trust China.

      China is already the major trading nation for a large number of countries and it is busy strengthening those ties, where as the US is trying to cut them.

      Any trade war the US gets into will on hasten the decline of the USA and strengthen everyone else. Sure the world will suffer for a while, but thats the nice thing about capitalism, someone else will fill the gap.

    2. Re:Huawhat? by sexconker · · Score: 0

      Nope, this is Trump doing as much damage as he can before he is impeached.

      Aww, look at the little Democrat. It's cute the way it's so dumb and blind.
      Make sure you keep him in his SafeSpace during the State of the Union address tonight! And don't let him hear about the memo until Maddow and Blitzer have spun it into a cozy web of lies for him.

    3. Re:Huawhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, this is Trump doing as much damage as he can before he is impeached.

      Aww, look at the little Democrat. It's cute the way it's so dumb and blind. Make sure you keep him in his SafeSpace during the State of the Union address tonight! And don't let him hear about the memo until Maddow and Blitzer have spun it into a cozy web of lies for him.

      Yeah brother, testify!! Let those LIbtards hear it! ... Donald Trump is the most perfect being ever produced by the process of intelligent design!

    4. Re:Huawhat? by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      Awww, look at the little idiot. Its quite cute the way they think everyone lives in the USA. Lots of people live in far better countries.

    5. Re:Huawhat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're an idiot faggot. Trump's a literal fucking retard. The one true leader is Mike Pence. Get behind that alpha chad. Unless you're a fucking faggot, then fry in an electric chair. fuckass.

  6. China vs USA by Mikkeles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Chinese are probably less interested in me (as a non-entity wrt their politics) than the USA, who seem interested in fucking up as many people as possible.

    --
    Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    1. Re:China vs USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly why I bought my Honor 8. I'd rather have someone with no jurisdiction over me collecting data rather than someone who may someday contort it into something to club me with.

    2. Re:China vs USA by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      The Chinese are probably less interested in me (as a non-entity wrt their politics) than the USA, who seem interested in fucking up as many people as possible.

      Your ignorance is astounding. Do you think the Chinese are any less interested in profit? They will scoop up your info and sell it just as fast as any other company with the added benefit of handing the Chinese government a copy of everything any perhaps leaving a backdoor for them or at least notify them of exploits before they are patched. If you don't think China's government is interested in US citizens then you are completely oblivious to how many companies they steal IP from.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    3. Re:China vs USA by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      If you don't think China's government is interested in US citizens then you are completely oblivious to how many companies they steal IP from.

      Not just that, but there's probably a market selling that data to the US government, whether directly or not. The US and China are adversaries, not enemies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:China vs USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you think the US government isn't sharing that data they scoop up about you? someones ignorance really is astounding.

  7. NSA, Chinese, Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They are all watching, and every modern device is compromised.. Choose your poison.

    Personally, i trust the Chinese devices more than US phones. I'm not a target for the Chinese, but i am for our own government, simply due to my existence..

    1. Re:NSA, Chinese, Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got some bad news for you, Sunshine. If you're alive, you're a target. Of all of them.

    2. Re:NSA, Chinese, Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. No value to them. None, zip, zero.

      Moonbeam.

    3. Re:NSA, Chinese, Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China will sell info to USA so...

  8. Nationalism ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    ... over capitalism. How odd. The American government knows full well that for all of the technology they have, disassembly of the devices reveals multinational components -- very few of which are American made.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  9. Putin put it correctly... by bogaboga · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These US folks are becoming experts in wasting time. Putin put it correctly: -

    "Dogs bark but the caravan goes on."

    We'll get them online. Enough said.

  10. And in other news by sit1963nz · · Score: 0

    US companies are blocked from the Chinese market over spying fears. China applies pressure and US companies find they are blocked from the Asian market, 60% of the worlds population, and the only major market that has real growth potential.

    1. Re:And in other news by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Actually, China already puts a huge 50% import tax on goods. Being blocked from the Chinese market isn't a big deal because few can actually afford them.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    2. Re:And in other news by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      And yet other countries have free trade deals with them.

      The USA is the 3rd largest trading partner after Australia and China. the new PPTA deal (without the USA) will open up other markets.
      New Zealand has a free trade agreement with China.

      If we had to stop trading with either China or the USA the USA would lose, and that is true for many countries.

    3. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is at best 20% of the world's population.

      But the blocking of Huawei from U.S. markets is sane, IMO. The U.S. should have fair (not free) trade laws with its trading partners to eliminate wage arbitrage, regulatory arbitrage, and other unfair trading practices.

      For certain, China's laws disadvantage foreign companies and it is not just related to companies where espionage may be a factor. One needs look no further than the automotive industry and the mandatory technology transfers and ownership stakes laws to see how the tables are tilted in China.

    4. Re:And in other news by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      And yet other countries have free trade deals with them.

      Most nations (including the USA) dance to the tune of their ultra-rich, so it makes sense to undermine one's own nation to get reduced profits rather than none at all.

      If we had to stop trading with either China or the USA the USA would lose, and that is true for many countries.

      Well it's a good thing the USA isn't making crazy demands like that then, eh?

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    5. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet other countries have free trade deals with them.

      The USA is the 3rd largest trading partner after Australia and China. the new PPTA deal (without the USA) will open up other markets.

      New Zealand has a free trade agreement with China.

      If we had to stop trading with either China or the USA the USA would lose, and that is true for many countries.

      If Antipodeans have truly free trade with China, then they're going to hollow out their economies just as the U.S. has hollowed out its economy.

      And if countries would prefer cheap crap from China (yes, I am aware not everything from China is crap) over higher-quality goods from more developed economies, that is their choice. But I think it would do a nation's people and the global environment good to purchase higher quality products.

      I don't think the U.S. would lose for too long (say one decade) if it were suddenly forced to start manufacturing many of the goods it consumes. If the U.S. can actually turn out relatively good product, I suspect those better products will find an international market over poorly-produced junk.

    6. Re:And in other news by sit1963nz · · Score: 1

      "Well it's a good thing the USA isn't making crazy demands like that then, eh?"

      Pulled out of the TPPA, wants to renegotiate NAFTA, and now inching towards a trade war with China, etc etc etc.

      Do you want to check your definition of crazy ?

    7. Re:And in other news by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      So, you twist my words to make me an opponent? Sure sounds like you just want to argue regardless of what it's about.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    8. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China already has the scale and expertise. What makes you think the US could compete?
      If they could they already would be.

    9. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ummm if we are purchasing on quality then the US will lose big time, China/Korea easily outdoes them at the top end of the market as well as the cheap end. The US needs protectionism to keep the poor/medicore quality crap that is produced their viable, without it US companies can't actually compete.

    10. Re:And in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is 20% of the worlds population, they have a heavy influence over another 40% of the worlds population, Africa makes up another 20% of the worlds population. This leaves still a sizable 20% of the worlds population with north and south America, Europe and oceania, however the US has been pulling out of trade agreements with most of them and alienating them too. The US cannot afford a trade war, it is not a war it can win.

  11. Hotspots Though? by mentil · · Score: 1

    My mom got a mobile hotspot from Verizon years ago and I groaned when I saw it was made by Huawei. Even if you don't think they're siphoning data, their devices are notorious for abysmal security.

    --
    Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
  12. tyranny by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    I thought that this was the country of freedom!

    1. Re:tyranny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh fuck off. Private company is wisely advised a Chinese company is doing shady shit and they decide not to sell the phones and you jump to 'OMGZ DA TYRANIES'

      Fuck off and die you whiny fucking bitch

  13. Making America Great Again by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    What made America great was the ability to buy cheap goods from abroad. As soon at phones cost three times what they do, people will cut back on them.

  14. why half measures? by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    If they don't believe the phones are secure and are telling carriers not to sell them, why not just go all the way and ban their importation and operation on US networks as a national security matter?

  15. This will bite the USoA in the ass by williamyf · · Score: 1

    Is a dick move, but understable, to ban Huawei equipment (cellphones, telecom Gear, servers, storage, datacom and SW) for the goverment at all levels (federal, state, local).

    Is and even dickier move (and not undestable) to ban private enterprises to use the network-side kit.

    But is the dickiest move, and the least understable one, to ban the direct sale of cellphones by carriers.

    Problem #1: Is the public that is the most harmed, as huawei phones are decent phones at decent prices, and joe sixpack could not care less that the chinese spies discover that he is galavanting. Less choices=less competition.

    Problem #2: It can inspire retaliatory measures by the chinese. And rightly so, may I add.

    Problem #3: Is probably ilegal by treaties like the ones signed in the WTO, so the government exposes itself to a complaint and losing face.

    Problem #4: When the USoA (being this administration or another one in the future) start to (re)negotiate trade deals, the potential partners will see this precedent and go Hummmm!

    Disclosure: I worked for Huawei in Venezuela on the telco side for a year, starting around 2007. At that time there was no server/storage/sw side. I later did technical training on Storage/Server/Cloud for them, but was not in their payroll.

    --
    *** Suerte a todos y Feliz dia!
    1. Re:This will bite the USoA in the ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think this is less about Huawei and more about taking control of the wireless infrastructure.

      It's madness to justify this move because one vendor provides gear they do not trust. The sensible thing would be provide a certification process and validation. Maybe never grant it to that vendor?

      This is just another false talking point to take control of the telecom industry for domestic spying purposes.

  16. Lets focus on the network, before the phones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To be honest, at work on a regular basis I hear about how the race is to 5G. First off, to hell with 'XG'. The US, comparing land mass, has great LTE coverage, however first, we don't implement IMS fully (at all), and even only Voice over LTE is hit or miss.

    As for American culture, SMS is huge, however *ALL* networks are still dependent on SMS over Circuit Switched network, whereas China Mobile is the only mass market provider to provide SMS over IMS. Granted, there's really no place for SMS in this world anymore, as data is all, and we really should switch to some unified application, however https://xkcd.com/927/ holds true. With my Korean friends and coworkers its Kakao, however in the US, its Google Hangouts, iMessage, and whatever else.

    In the end? Fuck off with your UE complaints for a bit, lets actually develop a real network. Truly think about it, secure it, implement your micro-cells and grow. I'm tired of this anti-global, anti-whatever-the-fuck bullshit that technology has become. We're all fucking geeks. We all *should* care about the future. Stop with the partisan bullshit, and put your brain where your mouth is. Give me one, just one fucking discussion on /. that doesn't refer to a US party post-dice, and I'll fucking be happy (As a US citizen).

    If all of the intelligent people here could collectively get their political heads out of their asses, perhaps we could change the world. I've been here since the late 90s, and the climate has changed significantly. Lets actually do something good.

    1. Re:Lets focus on the network, before the phones. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "there's really no place for SMS in this world anymore"

      I beg to differ, it is the ONLY device, network, and software agnostic method of messaging. Without SMS/MMS we are left with the walled garden silos of WhatsApp, iMessage, Google Hangouts, FB Messenger, SnapChat and whatever the messenger of the month is next.

      I for one am tired of the different combos of messaging apps and which of your friends/family is on which one. I got to the point that they are all removed from my device now. If you need to msg me there is SMS/MMS. I will not install any other messenger on my device and have made that clear to every one I am in contact with.

  17. Phones banned, mobile infrastructure OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we can't get Huawei phones but I'm sure a large part of the mobile infrastructure is Huawei tech.
    Heck I'm up in Canada and we built up 4G Huawei network to support our fleet tracking system and I know 90% of the cell towers in this area are all "Made in China"

    1. Re: Phones banned, mobile infrastructure OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Not one stitch of it in the Verizon Network.

  18. So what!? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    I don't care about Chinese and Russian spying or potential spying anymore. Our country has a whole lot more problems than that. We cannot even take care of our most vulnerable citizens and we have the highest incarceration rate in the western world. At this point it's just a distraction from domestic problems.

    1. Re:So what!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then why are you posting a technology site? Please go to a prison incarceration site and leave us alone.

  19. Tourism by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    One might expect to be detained at LAX for carrying a Huawei phone.

  20. Holy F***, I'm Confused. by davesays · · Score: 1

    I hate China, Huawei, Spies, Verizon, government intervention, and facisim. Who do I root for, here? :-)

    1. Re:Holy F***, I'm Confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, well said.

    2. Re:Holy F***, I'm Confused. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like it or not, government intervention is sometimes literally the only available measure to prevent certain shit that we really really don't want.

  21. Moot by duke_cheetah2003 · · Score: 1

    Do I really have to point out, all the other phones, made by everyone.. the parts in those phones are from China too? I mean, if the Chinese wanna slip in an AMT-like backdoor into some chips, we're screwed. This is just silly protectionism in the name of national security when it makes no fricken difference whatsoever in regards to national security.

    1. Re:Moot by beckett · · Score: 1

      he parts in those phones are from China too?

      look, do you want to cause a panic or something? look at the box it says "designed in Cupertino". Just calmly masturbate into the eco packaging like the rest of us and try to make sure it's out of view of the iSight camera that may or may not be on.

  22. Good. Don't need pre-installed malware floating by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    around in the purchases of idiots trying to infect the rest of us and siphon our info too.

  23. Instead, by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Verizon and AT&T will sell other phones that were still made in China, but that have Americanized names.

    Clearly these phones cannot contain spyware.

  24. Everyone forgetting Nortel Networks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wa-Way, the Chinese state company rose from the IP theft and actual destruction of Nortel Networks. Sure Nortel management was stupid and didn't heed warnings of security people, but lets not forget the entire foundation of the company is illegitimate.

    Also, if Wa-Way really wants to play in the American market, lets see their source code, you know, LIKE THEY DEMAND FROM US.

  25. "Free" market by houghi · · Score: 1

    I have no idea what deals the telecom providers in Belgium, where I live, have. I just know that I can buy any phone unlocked as requested by law. I can just go to any electronics store and byt any phone or buy one in China or wherever and use it with any of the telecom operators.

    And all that without roaming costs inside Europe and they still make a lot of monies.

    Yes, there are many people who buy their phone with their plan, but even then you could use that phone for whatever you desire. e.g. I buy a Samsung with a plan at X amount. I use the simcard in my iPhone and give the Samsung to my (imaginary) wife with another provider or to my sister who lives in another country> It will obviously not exclude me from payments, but I am free to use it as I please.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.