Slashdot Mirror


India Vows To Eliminate Use of Cryptocurrencies in the Country (hindustantimes.com)

India will move to stamp out use of cryptocurrencies, which it considers illegal, country's Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said on Thursday, launching a no-holds-barred attack on virtual currencies such as Bitcoin. From a report: Governments around the world are grappling with how to regulate cryptocurrency trading, and policymakers are expected to discuss the matter at a G20 summit in Argentina in March. "The government does not consider cryptocurrencies legal tender or coin and will take all measures to eliminate use of these cryptoassets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payment system," Jaitley told parliament in his annual budget speech. However, the minister said, the government would explore use of block chain technology proactively to speed the move toward a digital economy. Jaitley's announcement could trigger "panic selling" in cryptocurrencies in India, said Amit Maheshwari, partner at tax consultants Ashok Maheshwary & Associates LLP.

68 comments

  1. Not actually currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    cryptocurrencies are not actually currencies at the moment; they are gambling instruments, in that people are holding them on the expectation that they will rise in value. Are cryptocurrencies actually used as currencies in monetary transactions?

    They turn out to be very bad currencies, since their rate of deflation is huge (when the value of a currency goes up, that's deflation, not inflation: goods and services are becoming less expensive expressed in units of the currency.). A currency with high deflation doesn't work well, it makes more sense to keep it than to spend it, and spending is what makes currency currency.

    1. Re:Not actually currencies by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends which ones. Bitcoin is certainly not a currency: it's closer to a commodity (intrinsic value isn't a qualifier, just that it's a limited supply thing people want.) Ethereum is closer to a currency with its built in inflation rate over indefinite time. Curecoin is more of a point system for a charitable purpose to get people to donate computing cycles toward research. Some cryptocurrencies are more like securities in that they are direct translations to stocks in corporations or specific projects (in some cases the cryptocurrency even takes the place of stock altogether.) Most all the other alt-coins are just pyramid schemes, etc. Then you have things like Tether which exist just to facilitate USD transactions over different platforms (assuming the project leaders didn't just use the money, which I tend to doubt they did because a couple billion is more valuable generating interest, especially if it means they can just issue Tethers [or whatever they call their coin] to spend themselves and just keep the cash reinvested.) Then you have banks attempting to use blockchains to mitigate issues with interbank trading. The term cryptocurrency is a misnomer just because it is used generally to describe "blockchain implementations other than corporate ledgers" for the most part (the security versions could definitely qualify as a part of a corporate ledger, but there's already a pretty significant distinction between an inventory ledger and a stock ledger.)

      Honestly, blockchain is just a technology and sadly with Bitcoin getting all the attention all cryptocurrencies are considered scams, because that is inherently what a useless commodity with rapid planned deflation after rapid planned inflation is.) The technology as a whole has a lot of potential for just about any ledger system, but 99% of those implementations are going to end up getting called "cryptocurrencies" just because of the limited vocabularies possessed by the average person. It's important to keep in mind the purpose and the algorithms driving a specific implementation when declaring it a "scam" or "gambling instrument" because while many are not all are (and certainly none of the blockchains with long term potential are.)

    2. Re:Not actually currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good.... India is where most of the ICO/mining scams are being hosted from anyway. This should actually help clear up the landscape.

    3. Re:Not actually currencies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right now, cryptocurrencies are too unstable to be a currency, especially with all the manipulation going on where one party can affect the value on a gigantic basis, making ordinary insider trading look pathetic. As an investment, that ship has sailed. Governments are banning cryptocurrencies left and right (although they love the idea of a blockchain ledger as a way to find dirt on people.)

  2. Obsnark by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

    This is good news for Bitcoin!

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Obsnark by supremebob · · Score: 3, Informative

      You didn't hear? Bitcoin isn't considered to be a "cryptocurrency" anymore. Now it's considered to be a "store of value", like Gold or Silver.

      That might have had something to do with the fact that it now sucks to use as a currency, now that the transaction fees are insanely high and it takes forever to confirm a purchase. Even the criminal underworld has given up on it, and uses different cryptocurrency for things like drug buys and money laundering.

    2. Re:Obsnark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the fees still sky high? Last I looked in the last month its halved in value. I'd hope the transaction fees would have dropped, but I guess the electricity doesn't get cheaper even if the value of bitcoin does crash.

    3. Re:Obsnark by anonieuweling · · Score: 1

      You did not pay attention.
      The pool of unconfirmed transactions is quite low and fees are lower because of that.

    4. Re:Obsnark by religionofpeas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Fees are pretty low right now, and tests with Lightning Network are looking pretty good too. LN allows for near instantaneous payments for almost zero fee.

    5. Re: Obsnark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Near instantaneous for almost zero fee, congratulations you've described everything everyone already uses.

    6. Re: Obsnark by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Near instantaneous for almost zero fee, congratulations you've described everything everyone already uses.

      The world is bigger than your wallet and Starbucks. Ever used paypal, for instance ? Ever lived in a country with massive inflation ? Ever traded internationally ?

    7. Re: Obsnark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I do that retarded shit? I have real investments that hold actual tangible value.

    8. Re: Obsnark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would I do that retarded shit? I have real investments that hold actual tangible value.

      I'm sure you'll make a killing on those Beanie Babies.

    9. Re: Obsnark by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ever used paypal, for instance ?

      Yeah it has none of the downsides.

      Ever lived in a country with massive inflation ?

      Yep I call it bitcoin world. Shit it's halved in value in just the last 2 weeks. But seriously bitcoin isn't the answer here. The answer is already obvious, those countries just switch to using a different currency for day to day.

      Ever traded internationally ?

      Yes all the time. The interesting thing there is that no one cares how fast the transfer happens as long as the price is fixed at the destination. If you're using bitcoin for international transfers then you belong locked in a room with the pillows on the walls.

    10. Re:Obsnark by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      Many would argue a ~2% CC card fee is near 0 too. The entire point of Btc was to eliminate middle men. Turns out the only way to make Btc workable is a middle man. I cal that FAILURE!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    11. Re:Obsnark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitcoin fees are actually going down and the lighting network might actually resolve it more soon. I've partially moved on to Dash, Bitcoin Cash, and soon hopefully Zen Cash. The only reason I'm still using Bitcoin is because SaveAtPurse only takes Bitcoin still. You can do other crypto currencies but it ends up converted to Bitcoin. The reason SaveAtPurse.com is so valuable is that you can get up to 33% off of most items sold on Amazon so long as they have prime. I've been saving 19-33% on everything at Amazon for years and have saved 10s of thousands of dollars. 19% is almost instant and 33% might take a bit longer. A week maybe more. The longest it's taken me to get 33% off on anything was a month and a half. Hasn't been taking anywhere near that long though lately. So SaveAtPurse basically works because it takes advantage of the liquidity in the market. We have a lot of people in India earning Amazon credits that they either can't spend or don't want. They can purchase goods and have them shipped as gifts to you. Then you release the Bitcoin to them. Yea- Bitcoin is apparently significantly more valuable than Amazon store credit. This is why I haven't lost anything in all my years of using Bitcoin. I lost like $200 when it dropped once many years ago before I started using Purse. Now it's really hard to lose anything because even when it drops I've ended up doing less well. It dropped like 10-15% in the past day although its getting back up now to where it was when I bought it for example. Pretty significant drop- but the point is I'm still doing 15-22% better because the stuff I'm getting off Amazon with Purse are already as low as you can get the items for. As a result I've been able to save 10ks of thousands of dollars by accepting Bitcoin in my business and spending Bitcoin on Purse. Technically I also spend it elsewhere although I'm less apt to do so when it's on the downward swing. Though I've been spending Dash for most other transactions anyway so Bitcoin's value doesn't matter as much.

  3. This summary is inaccurate, massively so by thaylin · · Score: 4, Informative

    They dont consider it legal tender, but are not looking to emeleate its use, just stamp out illegal use like other countries.

    https://yourstory.com/2018/02/...

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
    1. Re: This summary is inaccurate, massively so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that.... The whole reason digital currencies were invented was to create something the government can't control.

    2. Re: This summary is inaccurate, massively so by thaylin · · Score: 1

      Not control does not mean illegal.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    3. Re:This summary is inaccurate, massively so by CodeHog · · Score: 1

      did you mean eliminate?

      --
      Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son.
    4. Re: This summary is inaccurate, massively so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If a government can't control (and profit) from it, they will ban it. Simple as that.

    5. Re:This summary is inaccurate, massively so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they were looking for ameliorate.

    6. Re: This summary is inaccurate, massively so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counter example: Masterbation.

      Your move, troll.

    7. Re:This summary is inaccurate, massively so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They dont consider it legal tender, but are not looking to emeleate its use, just stamp out illegal use like other countries.

      This is in stark contrast to legal tender, which is completely allowed in illegal use.

        Right? Wait...

      Illegal use makes it sound like the use is already a crime, aka illegal.
      It makes no sense to not allow crypto currency for illegal activities and allow legal tender for illegal activities. Illegal activities are already illegal, so there is no sense in such a distinction.

      Without the useless distinction explicitly stated, the claim now becomes: They are just trying to stamp out use of crypto currency.

    8. Re:This summary is inaccurate, massively so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the transcript, India's finance minister said:
      "The Government does not consider cryptocurrencies legal tender or coin and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payment system."

      Removing the deliberately misleading cruft, the statement becomes:
      "The Government will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets as part of the payment system."

      What do you suppose that means?

  4. Prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see... an Bitcoin article. Prediction of comments:

    Mumble mumble BUBBLE roobarb roobarb TULIPS roobarb mumble CRASH

  5. Time to short the thing... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    Folks, time to short BitCoin. Please short this thing to make $$.

    1. Re:Time to short the thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I just figured out who's been exchanging real currency for BitCoin. ^^

      p.s. I hope you go to prison for tax evasion.

  6. India also vows... by GeekWithAKnife · · Score: 3, Interesting


    to end porn...drug use...and well uhm. Stuff.

    Good thing they had picked a worthy pursuit we can all get behind! Seems ending poverty is nothing anyone (with money) cares about.

    Bitcoin settlements can be delivered by carrier pigeon, more code or encoded in text/email. -Stopping bitcoin is harder than stopping porn.

    I refer to The Simpsons -> http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/i... (Old man yells at Cloud)

    Before anyone can stop bitcoin they'll need to at first understand what bitcoin is. Considering some of these entrenched knee-jerk politicians are still coming to grips with DNS & VPN I'd worry in about 20 years...

    BTW, BTC will likely touch sub $3k - good time to buy. -You're welcome!

    --
    A 'singular oddity' is an event that cannot be explained and only happens when you are alone.
    1. Re:India also vows... by ancientt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup.

      Reminds me of a quote:
      "The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

      --
      B) Eliminate all the stupid users. This is frowned upon by society.
    2. Re:India also vows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, five will get you ten, ten will get you twenty.
      And never give a sucker an even break.

    3. Re:India also vows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can experience this first hand by squeezing a handful of sand. Not only does the sand run out, it runs out faster the harder you squeeze.

  7. Better idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a better idea.

    Eliminate spam.

    Spam has a full IP log that anyone with access to ISP logs and armed thugs will be able to follow back to the perpetrator.

    Cryptocurrencies have none of that. They have unique ids, yes, but no registry of those ids, so the only person who can prove who has a certain id is the owner of said id - if he wants to. On top of that, there is no way to prove that he doesn't have a certain id, making the difference between "doesn't want to" and "doesn't have one" non-existing.

    1. Re:Better idea by fisted · · Score: 1

      I have a better idea.

      Eliminate spam.

      Spam has a full IP log that anyone with access to ISP logs and armed thugs will be able to follow back to your grandma because of the router you got her a couple years ago

      FTFY

  8. Re:Bitcoin fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrong on both counts I see..

  9. The vise tightens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Poor computah nerds' brains are leaking out of their eyesockets. Truly the shit is raining hard upon them.

  10. Now, if only they would use TOILETS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    My GAWDZ! Been to a beach lately? Turd Dump City. Bears? OK. People. In the woods, when on a remote trip, okay, but on the beach, every day!?

    1. Re: Now, if only they would use TOILETS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you keep going to Turd Dump City every day?

    2. Re: Now, if only they would use TOILETS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's on the way to new vertaron city. pft. stupid much?

  11. problem solved by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Funny

    In related news, the Government of India just announced that anyone with Bitcoins must bring them in to be exchanged for "miniBitcoins" worth 1/10 the value or else they will expire next Tuesday.

  12. Ripple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how that affects Ripple who has offices in Mumai.

  13. India should eliminate fake degrees and php expert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India should eliminate fake degrees and "php experts" first.

    Ending internet censorship would be good too.

    And 3 hour movies that can be told in 90 minutes, easily.

  14. fakenews, I disappoint slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot really?
    fud story...

    what was said is that bitcoin is not a legal tender, which does NOT make it possesion illegal...
    come on slashdot, this is weak. off the site please or correct the story.

    remember, remember....
    no single entity can control price of cryptocurrency, only people who have it. therefore, it is crucial not to trade it on the basis of fud news, statements/tweets. Please remove this garbage off your site, keep it up and #HODL

  15. Re:Bitcoin fails again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the alt-right snowflake!

  16. The USA made it illegal to own gold by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    from 1933 to 1975, when they got the US off the gold standard and onto fiat currency. Whether cryptocurrencies are viable long-term, I couldn't tell you, but governments HATE not having a monopoly on stores of value.

    1. Re:The USA made it illegal to own gold by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      from 1933 to 1975, when they got the US off the gold standard and onto fiat currency. Whether cryptocurrencies are viable long-term, I couldn't tell you, but governments HATE not having a monopoly on stores of value.

      Actually, it was used to increase the money supply as the government bought US. gold and increased the price about 75% resulting in foreign holdersof gold selling it to the US. This increase in gold holdings resulted in an increase in the money supply, inflation and an increse in output. It was not illegal to own good as jewlery and collector coins was still ok. The old habit of buying gold chains as a way to hold gold was still possible.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    2. Re:The USA made it illegal to own gold by spth · · Score: 1

      And in India, which this article is about, it was illegal to own gold from 1963 to 1990. There were some exception for jewelry of up to 14 karat.

      Even more closer to the topic of the article, since 2016 Indian politicians have been making statements about making it illegal to own too much gold again. At various times, the introduction of upper limits of 250, 500 or 1000g per person were announced.

      Philipp

    3. Re:The USA made it illegal to own gold by dj245 · · Score: 1

      from 1933 to 1975, when they got the US off the gold standard and onto fiat currency. Whether cryptocurrencies are viable long-term, I couldn't tell you, but governments HATE not having a monopoly on stores of value.

      The old habit of buying gold chains as a way to hold gold was still possible.

      Not only possible, but stylish

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    4. Re: The USA made it illegal to own gold by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pity the fool.

    5. Re:The USA made it illegal to own gold by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

      Not only possible, but stylish

      I pity the fool who doesn't own gold...

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  17. Just like smoking and drug use by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    Good luck with that.

  18. Simply Incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "India does not recognise crypto as legal tender" would be a more accurate title.

    Check the facts!

  19. Only Information is of value. by wolfheart111 · · Score: 1

    And judging by this article the Indian Gov is quite poor. If your not online learning everyday your really falling behind your classmates.

    --
    [($)]
  20. it's not being banned. Read. by SinisterEVIL · · Score: 1

    It's illegal uses are being cracked down on, not being banned itself. It's all right there in the text. All the headlines say "All cryptocurrencies to be banned"... Which i'm guessing was done to attract readers.

  21. Not true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are 100% wrong. Crypto currencies have a ledger, and the person(s) that own or run the block chain have full access to that ledger, otherwise there is no reason to have a crypto currency in the first place.

  22. Capital Flight and Undermining Redenomination by Koreantoast · · Score: 2

    I see two things motivating the government: capital flight and undermining redenomination. Regarding capital flight: particularly in developing countries, governments take great steps to restrict the amount of money people take out of the country. The idea is that if you can keep money in country, it'll go to growing the local economy versus investments overseas. Traditionally, these controls have been imposed through government bank regulations. Bitcoin and other "cryptocurrencies" give people an alternative medium to move money and bypass government controls which I'm sure is bothering the Modi government.

    The other thing to remember is that India just went through redenomination, where they effectively removed a large number of bills out of circulation (about 80% of all cash value). This was done to shrink the shadow economy, basically the cash-driven underground economy, so that the government can better monitor (and tax) sales, income, etc. It also pushes more money into more traceable electronic transactions, making it harder for corruption payments and criminal funds transfers. Cryptocurrencies however provide another means to move value that the Indian government doesn't have the ability to track (yet), thus the initial reaction to shut it down.

  23. Why this is idiotic by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    Let's back up 100 years or so. India decides electricity is too dangerous and powerful and expensive and just a bad idea. They ban electricity. Great, nobody getting electrocuted and they save money on infrastructure. Yay! Fast forward 100 years and their country would be a joke, left behind by all other countries and they'd basically be bankrupt for not adopting the latest and greatest in superior technology. Let's imagine the same with computers. Computers are capable of letting people commit crimes so let's ban them. Where would that land for 50 years later? Plugging your ears and pretending that bitcoins don't exist while not letting your population use them is not an effective long term strategy to compete on a global scale.

    1. Re:Why this is idiotic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of two things happen. Either they find a way to regulate or get their share of the dosh, or they treat it as opium or marijuana, and have random pograms with lots of people being busted using it.

      Cryptocurrencies are in some ways harder, and some ways easier to catch than having a dime bag of MJ:

      Easier: Sniffing packets can find miners, as well as monitoring energy consumption. Similar with people doing transactions.

      Harder: If people start using offshore VPNs, the traffic in flight can't be found. Storage, a wallet is just a set of big numbers, and can be stashed anywhere, stegoed into a picture, stuffed into the hidden part of a TrueCrypt volume, or anything like that. If there is one sophisticated way, the attackers will leapfrog it, and India needs to spend time getting its people out of bathing in the Ganges while the dead bodies are going by, rather than trying to catch low-value, high cost criminal activity.

  24. But nothing about sanitation by OneHundredAndTen · · Score: 0

    Amazing how India keeps coming with all sorts of grandiose public statements about all sorts of things, while consistently ignoring the plight of the more than 600 million Indian citizens who lack such basic services as sanitation, running water and electricity. Talk about having a huge chip in one's shoulder.

    1. Re: But nothing about sanitation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Priorities ;) besides the rich won't regulate themselves.

  25. ha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol bitcoin peniscoin lol

  26. Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the most abundant gift of Satan.

  27. Re:it's not being banned. Read. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's illegal uses are being cracked down on, not being banned itself. It's all right there in the text. All the headlines say "All cryptocurrencies to be banned"... Which i'm guessing was done to attract readers.

    The text is:
    "The Government does not consider cryptocurrencies legal tender or coin and will take all measures to eliminate use of these crypto-assets in financing illegitimate activities or as part of the payment system."

    Presumably this means they want to eliminate the use of all cryptocurrencies in "the payment system". I don't know what that means but I'm sure it's more broad than "illegal uses".

  28. Ban it because "financing illegitimate activities" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hilarious- doesn't India understand that banning crypto currencies means that only legitimate users will *maybe* stop using it? The reality is individuals don't need India's permission to use crypto as it is a decentralized system that India can't effectively control. Even if they can get non-criminals to stop by making it illegal those willing to commit criminal acts are going to continue to use crypto because it gets them around government controls. It's why criminals liked it until recently (ie it was not anonymity but control) when other more semi-anonymous crypto currencies took off (and we have anonymous ones now with Zen Cash and Zcash adopting the Zero Coin protocol which is a mathematically sound protocol for anonymity that involves zero knowledge proofs). India isn't in control of crypto and will ultimately lose the war on crime because they've got no effective means of stopping criminals from using it and will ultimately only create more criminals because non-"criminals" decide to continue using it for there legitimate transactions or simply don't know it's illegal.