Slashdot Mirror


Games Organizers at Pyeongchang Winter Olympics Confirm Cyber Attack, Won't Reveal Source (reuters.com)

Pyeongchang Winter Olympics organizers confirmed on Sunday that the Games had fallen victim to a cyber attack during Friday's opening ceremony, but they refused to reveal the source. From a report: The Games' systems, including the internet and television services, were affected by the hack two days ago but organizers said it had not compromised any critical part of their operations. "Maintaining secure operations is our purpose," said International Olympic Committee (IOC) spokesman Mark Adams. "We are not going to comment on the issue. It is one we are dealing with. We are making sure our systems are secure and they are secure."

73 comments

  1. Well, that means... by Bartles · · Score: 1

    ...the NORKS did it.

    1. Re:Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back under the bridge! Come back when you have a logical discussion about who hacked another nation that doesn't involve your mom's-basement command center.

    2. Re:Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Norks a-mercy!

      Isn't 'faggot' a slur?

    3. Re: Well, that means... by negRo_slim · · Score: 2

      Red Scare 2.0, the ride never ends...
      What a time to be alive.

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    4. Re: Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all just too dumb to separate trolls from legitimate concerns, and to defend "your guy", you just hand wave actual concerns away.

      Doesn't matter, you'll get what you deserve once he fucks you like he's fucked contractors and investors historically.

    5. Re:Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the YANKS actually! They're a bunch of miscreants and would have a particular strong reason to do it now when relations in Korea are warming up.

    6. Re: Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with some things and disagree with others.

      This makes me Orthogon, Master of Indeciveness.

      -BeauHD-

    7. Re: Well, that means... by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would be 3.0 if it were actually a Red Scare. The first one was right after WWI around 1919-1920.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

        The one most remembered (at least in the US) was after WWII in the '50s mostly. McCarthy and all that fun stuff.

      Those scares had a lot to do with communism if I'm not mistaken though I did not live through either of them. As I understand it there was a fear that the idea of communism would take hold in the US and would take over our ideals of freedom and democracy.

        I was born during the Cold War though and one could argue that it never ended even after the fall of the Soviet Union.

      Were we afraid of communism or the Soviet Union? Dammit, Jim I'm a doctor not a historian. (I'm not really a doctor either). I was raised to be afraid of the Soviet Union though.

      "Better dead than Red" and all that nonsense.

      What a time to be alive.

      Indeed. In my lifetime I have seen leaps and bounds in technology. I wonder what the next 10 years holds for us let alone the next 50 or 100.

    8. Re: Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shut up already.

    9. Re: Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People like you make me happy I voted for Trump. And more than willing to vote him again.

      For no other reason than to piss off worthless people like you.

    10. Re:Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct. The North is up to their usual tricks, looking for every advantage and method of attack in defiance of the rest of the world. The south desperately wants rapprochement, at least during the games, and it they certainly don't want a war afterwards. What ever the north can get away with, the south will grin and bear it. At least until the next general election.

    11. Re: Well, that means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Faggots like you don't matter. That's why we bury you nazi cunts.

  2. Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Norks.

      Add some excitement to the boring winter so-called sports games. Curling? Snowboard? Skijump ... down a pair of tracks? The Agony of Defeat is no more. And that IS boring. So/.

    NUKE THE NORKS!

    1. Re: Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The way you bring mating in your shallow insults as if it was the holy Grail says a lot about you. Is it possible that you are, yourself, unattractive and lonely? Spend a bit more time on pornhub and less on slashdot, everyone will come out a winner.

    2. Re:Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canutz on slashdot?

    3. Re: Nuke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to tip your fedora.

  3. Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PutinSmirk.png

    1. Re:Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by bestweasel · · Score: 2

      Hey the athletes formerly known as Russians had no gold medals but now the scoreboard says 10 and something rude about NATO.

    2. Re:Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I would be more suspicious about the US. The government seems to be taking the diplomatic tension easing between South and North as a personally insult to the US, can't possibly have the locals achieving more in a few weeks than months of temper tantrums from trump.

    3. Re:Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, Trump is far too retarded to actually be calling any shots, he's just signing off on smarter people's recommendations as they are presented. The US is rightfully concerned about NK using the games as a propaganda inroad to demoralize their enemies resolve. At any rate it is an effective stall to the American drumbeat, nothing will happen during the games and if they go "well enough" there's a good chance the support for military action will ratchet down considerably. That's a challenge to a US effort to force this situation to a resolution, one way or another. It's not unreasonable to think the US would have a motive in disrupting things, but Russia obviously has quite an appetite for that also.

      But why guess? These things are determined by evidence. To be "suspicious" of a hypothetical motive is borderline useless, counterproductive. It opens the door to any kind of unsubstantiated Hannity/Rush bullshit theories.

    4. Re:Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "South and North as a personally insult to the US"
      Because the US is the only country trying to challenge NK. Trump didn't cause the NK problem. 50 years of failed diplomacy, extortion, and lies have caused the problem. It seems to me that Trump's actions have finally gotten China to start enforcing the sanctions leveled at NK. Throwing nuclear annihilation on the negotiating table can achieve remarkable goals.

      Trump's policy of bad mouthing and publically issuing vailed threats and insulting his detractors has forced the world powers to re-evaluate US actions. The US has become too predictable and it's enemies know exactly how to exploit that predictability. The US is trapped underneath mutual defense treaties from both SK and Japan. These treaties have resulted in planting US military bases on the front line. The US military forces in the area are nothing more trip wires. If China attacked Japan or NK attacked SK US military personal would be the first to die which would trigger a full scale US military action.

      If SK feels they can handle the NK problem than the US military can pack up and leave. All SK has to do is ask the US to leave. Same thing applies to Japan. And the Olympic SK-NK circle jerk is only postponing the argument during the Olympics. And the shiny SK Olympics will most likely look like Kosovo Olympics in a few years.

    5. Re:Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unfortunately the evidence will always say whatever those presenting the evidence want it to say. At that point it could be true or a complete fabrication for political ends. Russia and its leaders, while arseholes, aren't dumb and it would directly play against their propaganda of the west unfairly targeting them. They would be well aware they would likely take the blame whether they were responsible or not, this would tend to steer me towards either just an independent hacking group seeking fame or parties like the US with political goals.

    6. Re:Who could possibly be mad at the Olympics?! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Also, the biathlon has been moved to a wooded area outside of Chernobyl.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  4. Two guesses... by msauve · · Score: 2

    Russia or North Korea?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was the Dutch.

    2. Re:Two guesses... by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      the hackers from Russia

    3. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't be North Korea. It's easier for Great Leader to execute non medal winners in front of large cannons.

    4. Re:Two guesses... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      Russia or North Korea?

      Just wait and see who wins all the medals.

      It would be very suspicious if Canada and the Scandinavian countries left without any medals.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    5. Re:Two guesses... by dohzer · · Score: 1

      Why not do both? ""\_(^.^)_/""

    6. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      North Korea is trying to play nice guy right now. Getting caught hacking would be detrimental. Russia on the other hand is banned from the entire games and pissed about it. It's kind of a "duh" as far as motive.

    7. Re:Two guesses... by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      Yah, TFA said they saw indications back in Jan. Fwiw, I could see independent (or state-sponsored) hackers from many countries that would want to retaliate when the world is not fair.

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    8. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it was the Canadians. Trudeau hear someone had using the term 'mankind' in a memo so he had someone hack in and check it to 'peoplekind'.

    9. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And any script kiddie wanting to see their name up there as winner of the luge.

    10. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both. NK most probably paid the Russian!

    11. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Korea is trying to play nice guy right now.

      North Korea couldn't play nice if it was lead by Barney the Dinosaur.

      But hey yeah, let's invite them...after all, Kim Jong-Un pinky swore he would try really hard to not murder one of his own family members this year...

    12. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way North Korea would do something like that. The media has been fawning over their head of propaganda and reeducation. Nobody they adore would do something bad. After all, they can recognize another professional in their own field.

    13. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well one of those countries is actually finally making positive strides in international relations with it's neighbour at these games and the other has gained itself the honour of being the only country humiliated and banned from taking part because it had a state sponsored doping ring trying to help it's athletes come top because as a nation they don't take losing well, even though it's all they ever really do.

      So given only one nation isn't taking part in the games through it's own stupid fault, given that nation takes things really really badly when it doesn't get it's way like a petulant child, and given that nation has invested billions in and actively engaged in cyber warfare in recent years, which do you think it's most likely to be?

      They've got form too, when the Russian doping scandal broke they already hacked the IoC once before to release private medical records of other athletes to try and imply that legal and legitimate drug use for genuine ailments was somehow equivalent to state sponsored cheating with illegal drug use.

      The IoC did the right thing (albeit it 2 years too late - it should've done it for Beijing) but has put itself in the sights of the country that currently seems to have the most prolific aggressive cyber operations in the world right now who's purpose seems to be nothing more than bolstering national pride to keep Putin in power.

    14. Re: Two guesses... by stinkyjak · · Score: 1

      China, Russia, and USA ... are your world leading breachers. Any of the three would be. Good guess.

    15. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realize what the whole point of even having the olympics is, though right?

    16. Re:Two guesses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumb as fuck liberals are going to ensure he'll be down one sister by the end of the year.

      Keep propping accolades upon the Mistress of Agitpop, you silly fucks.

  5. IOCs vs. âoeThe Sourceâ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article is misleading people to believe that they already have attribution for this attack. While theyâ(TM)ve found Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) and have chosen not to publish them this does not mean that they know who is behind the attacks. This can take time and will likely require collaboration with both govt intelligence and private sources.

  6. No collusion by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

    I would have said Russia, but there's no evidence of collusion.

    1. Re: No collusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there.

  7. Famous last words by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    We are making sure our systems are secure and they are secure.

    That last part is over-confidence. It's hard to know if one has plugged all breaches.

  8. Re:Trump prisonathlon : Fraud, Obstruciton, Treaso by Hal_Porter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Democrats won't lock up Trump for the same reason that the Republicans won't lock up Clinton.

    Locking up failed POTUS tier politicians just because they've committed a crime would set a nasty precedent that neither party wants to set - the system would spiral down into one where politicians would all end up in prison at the end of the careers rather than giving speeches to Goldman Sachs for $300K a shot. Or, even worse from their perspective, one where elite politicians didn't act like they're completely above the law. The horror!

    They're like two cats having a fight over who gets to fuck the female - they'll draw blood and maybe disable their opponent but they won't kill each other. The female in this analogy being you, the American voter.

    But keep chanting 'Lock her/him up!' if it makes you feel empowered.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  9. Face revealing by Max_W · · Score: 1

    I noticed on TV that Mike Pence looked kind of upset during the opening ceremony.

    1. Re:Face revealing by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1, Troll

      That’s because there was a woman standing behind him who wasn’t accompanied by her husband and had authority over a bunch of men.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    2. Re:Face revealing by BlueStrat · · Score: 1

      Thatâ(TM)s because there was a woman standing behind him who wasnâ(TM)t accompanied by her husband and had authority over a bunch of men.

      Wait, Obama was there!? And without Mike..err...'Michelle'?

      Strat

      --
      Progressivism (aka US 'Liberalism'): Ideas so good they need a police/surveillance-state to enforce.
    3. Re:Face revealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That’s because there was a woman standing behind him who wasn’t accompanied by her husband and had authority over a bunch of men.

      Oh, you mean that North Korean harridan propaganda minister, who sits on North Korea's Politburo?

      You know, North Korea? That country that conducts assassinations in other country's airports using VX nerve agent? That blows up airliners? That literally starves its population? That tortures college students to death?

      It would be amazing if we could split a country in half, let one half go socialist and one half capitalist, come back 75 years later, and compare the results. What an experiment that would be...

    4. Re:Face revealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes? Not sure what point you were trying to make there, but it was completely different than anything anyone else was talking about.

    5. Re: Face revealing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it's worrying. What kind of man says "I can't be trusted to be left alone with a woman"? Well rapists obviously, probably some fundamentalist Muslim clerics in the Middle East but in the US? That the voters there not only somehow think this is acceptable but elect him to a position of power instead of saying "Get lost you creep" says a lot.

    6. Re:Face revealing by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Requoting the AC below, for your viewing pleasure:

      That’s because there was a woman standing behind him who wasn’t accompanied by her husband and had authority over a bunch of men.

      Oh, you mean that North Korean harridan propaganda minister, who sits on North Korea's Politburo?

      You know, North Korea? That country that conducts assassinations in other country's airports using VX nerve agent? That blows up airliners? That literally starves its population? That tortures college students to death?

      It would be amazing if we could split a country in half, let one half go socialist and one half capitalist, come back 75 years later, and compare the results. What an experiment that would be...

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    7. Re:Face revealing by LeftCoastThinker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as second in line to leader of the free world, being right in front of one of the top representatives of an insane murderous state would make me nervous as well.

      N. Korea conducts assassinations in other country's airports using VX nerve agent. They blow up airliners. They literally starve their population.

      They just recently tortured a college student to death.

      I wouldn't be too happy in his place either.

      --
      If you disagree, please post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like
    8. Re: Face revealing by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      Why is this marked "Troll"? This was gold! I lol'd.

  10. Re:Trump prisonathlon : Fraud, Obstruciton, Treaso by Hal_Porter · · Score: 0

    Why are you anti Trump AC trolls so obsessed with homosexuality and obesity?

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  11. NSA/CIA and false flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they would LOVE to throw wrenches in the works now that relations between NK and SK are thawing. It would of course involve compromised machines or directing the attacks in a way that makes it look like NK, China, or possibly Russia were doing it.

    Don't let America sow mistrust.

  12. Re:Trump prisonathlon : Fraud, Obstruciton, Treaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's creimer projecting his problems onto the rest of the Slashdot audience.
     
    APK

  13. Re:Trump prisonathlon : Fraud, Obstruciton, Treaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're fat and there IS obviously a prosecution pending, moron. You can deny it right up until it happens I guess, but that's retarded even for you who asserted Silicon-Germanium was a pipe dream for foundries to use in chips.

    You're a moron. And you're a fat moron.

  14. Re:Trump prisonathlon : Fraud, Obstruciton, Treaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor old creimer. Fat, toothless and sexually frustrated. And probably rather short of money too.

  15. Re:Trump prisonathlon : Fraud, Obstruciton, Treaso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same reason you suck Trump's tiny dick at every rhetorical opportunity, fat treason apologist cocksucker Hal Porter. By the way, they DO use Silicon-Germanium at foundries and have for a while now. You're a moron.

    You'll say anything at all, but thankfully we'll all have the last laugh while you whine about Trump being carted off to prison, you fat stupid fuck lol. Enjoy your complicity with treason meanwhile. We'll be watching you forever.

    Bite down on something, prepare yourself. Nazi faggots like you will get what's coming, oh and it's a long time coming.

  16. Still more attacks not stopped by APKs work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here we have still another attack that APK's work would have failed to prevent. I'm sure he is trying desperately to find a hosts file that someone created that stops this that he could pull down with his work so he can say he now stops it well after the attack.

  17. Getting upset while sitting next to evil is bad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kim Yo Jong is evil personified. The fawning over her is nauseating.

    PSA: Kim Jong Un's Sister Is Not Your New Fave Shade Queen. She's A Garbage Monster.
    What the hell is wrong with you people?

    1. She's believed to be part of the regime's Propaganda and Agitation Department...so she's prooooobably not trying to defect.

    ...

    2. Speaking of family, Kim Jong Un is believed to have ordered the assassination of his own half brother, Kim Jong Nam.

    ...

    3. The North Korean regime commits frequent public executions of its own citizens.

    ...

    4. In fact, the North Korean regime actually enslaves many of its citizens.

    ...

    5. The regime is one of the world's most repressive. It strips its citizens of all sorts of rights, including freedom of expression, freedom of information, and the freedom to move in and out of the country.

    ...

    6. Kim Yo Jong's family literally runs gulags.

    A United Nations inspector in 2013 spoke of "unspeakable atrocities" inflicted on political prisoners in North Korean camps.

    Michael Kirby, a former Australian High Court judge, told the UN his team had heard testimony from a man who had been imprisoned in North Korea from birth, eating lizards, rodents, and grass to survive. One woman was forced to drown her own baby in a bucket.

    7. Her brother's regime has been blamed for the death of US college student Otto Warmbier.

    Otto Warmbier was detained in North Korea in January 2016 after he was accused of a "hostile act" while on a group tour. Warmbier was accused of stealing a poster at his hotel in Pyongyang, and sentenced to 15 years of prison and hard labor. After being held for 17 months, he was only extradited back to the US when he was in a coma. He died soon after.

    Sen. John McCain has said Warmbier was "murdered" by North Korea. "In the final year of his life, he lived the nightmare in which the North Korean people have been trapped for 70 years: forced labor, mass starvation, systematic cruelty, torture, and murder," the Arizona Republican said.

    8. She's part of a country that is, quite literally, threatening nuclear war against the US.